/cow/ - Lolcows (NO MOLAY)

I believe you mean Trumper Stickers

>>128819

Didn't he already copyright that?

It would be kind of cool if he promised to make stem cell research legal and proved he was serious by getting scientists to fix his hair with them. How can we trust him to fix the economy when he has billions of dollars and can't be bothered to make himself look less absurd?

I also heard a clip of him on NPR the other day making really ridiculous and grandiose claims such as that he would be the best President God ever produced.

>>128821

To be fair global warming has been shown to not be occurring as the temperature has actually gone down over the past 15 years, as well as only going down something like .5 degrees over the past century. It's why the people that were going on about global warming a decade ago now just say "climate change".

Anyone who sees Trump's bid for presidency as anything more than a vulgarly vainglorious display of wealth is a moron.

Were he inclined, Penn Jillette would make a far more serious presidential bid.

>>128842

Gotta hand it to Trump, though. Decades later, he's still trolling the world.

I'd buy a Commander Stryker 2016 bumper sticker

>>128830

No if hasn't. http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Your "facts" are the bullshit that industry tells you and congress while asking for looser regulations and more corporate welfare. It's absurd.

This is what /cow/ needs to do:

Find a way to slander Donald Trump in a way that's completely legal yet he finds it infuriating. He's already shown that he has absolutely no sense of humor when it comes to himself and this is something we can exploit for massive lulz. Donnie boy has many lolcow characteristics, he just needs a little nudge in the right direction.

>>128880

>corporate welfare

>implying trump isnt the best canidate this year

Better than shillary or the good goy rand paul

>>128843

I really do believe in Trump's case, he is the troll and the world is his cow.

>>128906

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/economic-intelligence/2014/08/06/the-surprising-truth-about-oil-and-gas-company-corporate-tax-rates

It does figure that your get your political opinions from south park. That's like getting them from Moore. Give me a break.

>>128921

And what's this? 50 billion dollars. Just wow. http://www.taxpayer.net/media-center/article/4-examples-of-corporate-welfare-in-action that's a lot of money. The majority isn't going mom and pop. What does that say?

You're all fired.

God, I can't wait for the Republican debates if he is actually on stage. Imagine Huckabee, Bachmann, Santorum, Trump…

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/247383-trump-leads-gop-presidential-field-in-new-national-poll

>4 points ahead of former Gov. Jeb Bush (Fla.) and Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.), who were tied for second place

>Gov. Scott Walker (Wis.), Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.) and former Gov. Mike Huckabee (Ark.) shared the third spot with 9 percent each

https://thenib.com/donald-trump-is-a-goddamn-fraud-7ec7a503dafc?source=latest

You'll probably support him even more after reading this

>>128830

>It's why the people that were going on about global warming a decade ago now just say "climate change".

No, it's because if you look at different scales there are climates that will become colder (like europe in the case of the gulf stream shutting down) and other that become hotter. It's for the idiots who say "this year is colder than average, so climate warming is a hoax". While climate is defined as a period of 30 years and one or even ten years are not that important when the average of 30 years is still indicating that the average climate of the earth is rising.

If you want to attack the estimated consequences of climate change look at feedback loops and the modelling. That is where the academic discussion is at. That a system changes when you pour huge amounts of anything in it should be pretty easy to understand (like pissing in a pool and inviting your buddies to piss too, the cocks of the pool will change), but how it will change is a thing for debate.

>>128881

Look at the interviews of NBC with Trump. You can't rustle him. He is the one who is milking the journalists.

>>137835

The guy seem like a liberal tear machine.

>>137835

>>137837

>>137835

The estimates being touted around a decade ago, during the time global warming was used, suggested average temperatures at least 10 degrees higher than we have. It was just scaremongering.

>>137853

>It was just scaremongering.

No.

Meteorology is a difficult field and as mentioned, the effects of certain feedback loops are not that clear. Also the climate modelling, which was used to make those predictions, were (and I guess still are) not that well developed.

Scientists are not omnipotent, they predict as good as they can, but they make sure that it is clear that these estimations can be wrong and what their problems are. Journalists and politicians use some results to push their agendas (I'm not denying that some scientists are doing the same). Scientist try to falsify everything. If it can't be disproven, it seems to be correct, until it is falsified. Everyone else wants to show off how much they know and states findings of scientists as ultimate proof.

The scaremongering was of the side of journalists and politicians. It came handy for some scientists, because finally something was happening and their warnings were not ignored. But in the end the politicians twisted their message to make stupid reforms that changed nothing for the better.

>suggested average temperatures at least 10 degrees higher than we have.

There were several scenarios. I could go on for a while what problems the models had, but as mentioned, meteorology is difficult and many things are unknown.

There are other problems that occured that were predicted, like the acidification of the oceans. You can look up the changes in pH, they fit to the change in CO2 concentration of the atmosphere. Actually it's not difficult to calculate and check that by yourself, simple equilibirum equation. It's a fact that the system changes and we make our best guesses how this will happen, but we can't predict the future.

>>137880

The problem isn't that global warming/climate change isn't happening. It's more whether humanity or man-made involvement is the cause/significant contributor.

Unfortunately, it's such a major long scale timetable sort of method of finding out and even then has a lot more reactionary data to go by since predictions vary wildly. That and we can't expect a worldwide test and can only go "Let's try this and see what happens down the line" sort of means of fixing it. It's not like most other pollution which is small enough scale and faster to notice, like dumping chemicals in the water or air killed wildlife sort of issue.

>>137890

Man's effect on the climate has been exaggerated in order to use climate shift as way to wield power. That's why last Mother's Day liberals complained that getting your mom flowers was hurting the environment or last 4th of July that BBQs would end the world. Wake up, you sheep!

>>128808

Trump is an A+ troll that's making both the Democrats and Republicans butthurt. I hope that he keeps making speeches for the next year or so.

>>137890

>It's more whether humanity or man-made involvement is the cause/significant contributor.

>>137919

>Man's effect on the climate has been exaggerated in order to use climate shift as way to wield power.

It's rather a question how it should be possible that humans have no significant effect. There are studies that show that precipitation is more likely on weekends, because the smog of the working days builds up a significant aerosol concentration. Cities are known for being "hot spots" that influence the microclimate of the surrounding area. The way humans change the albedo of whole landscapes due to deforestation, infrastructure (which takes up to 2/3 of the area in cities) and buildings. I could go on for a while, but my point is we change nature to such a degree, we changed the chemistry of oceans, lakes, soils, for fucks sake, trees grow faster due to the nitrate from exhaust gases, but the climate should be unaffected? I get the feeling that people can't believe it, because the atmosphere is so huge. Yeah, right, unlike oceans… I mean the troposphere is 7 - 17 km high. That is pretty thin.

But the politicians and journalists take the focus away from the industry, which fucks up everything left and right, to the consumers, who are really insignificant. We could all recycle and use less energy, it wouldn't matter. But no one is allowed to regulate the industry because muh jobs.

>>128821

>>128821

http://theinternationalcoalition.blogspot.com/2011/07/john-coleman-global-warming-is-scam.html

>>128830

http://theinternationalcoalition.blogspot.com/2011/07/john-coleman-global-warming-is-scam.html

http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/05/07/600-page-litany-of-doom-weather-channel-co-founder-john-coleman-slams-obama-climate-report-a-total-distortion-of-the-data-and-agenda-driven-destructive-episode-of-bad-science-gone-berserk/

>>137880

Why are you bringing up acidification of the ocean?

That's supposed to be connected to the Earth b coming an increasingly hotter oven as doomsayers predicted?

Everyone knows pollution is bad, but not everyone suggests using plastic bags will melt the Earth. There's a difference between these things.

>>138159

>Why are you bringing up acidification of the ocean?

Because it is somethings that scientists predicted and what we can see right now. Also climate change and acidification are both caused by the change of concentrations of certain gases in the atmosphere. The acidification of the oceans results from the "desire" of water to be at equilibrium with the atmosphere, thus taking up more CO2.

The increased temperature of the atmosphere is partially due to CO2's ability to store energy. As I mentioned earlier, there are several feedback loops one have to take into account and it's not clear if some feedback loops cancel others out or even inverse the trend, but as long as we are not sure, I say better safe than sorry.

>>138159

Because CO2 gets dissolved in the ocean, forming carbonic acid and lowering the pH of the water. For ecosystems where massive swaths of organisms rely on calcium carbonate shells and exoskeletons (which dissolve in acid), a small decrease in pH can have a massive effect, and this is already being seen.

As for what you said about it being predicted to be 10 degrees higher than it currently is, that was never a consensus view shared by the scientific community. The stories that get passed around on blogs and the popular press are always going to be the most sensationalist fringe predictions.

Sperging for Donald?

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

>>138599

Let this be the last climate change post in this thread until Donald Trump himself says something new about it.

>>138878

We had a black guy. It's time we had another legacy. That was the deal.

>>137650

YEAH LET'S VOTE FOR HILLARY OR THE OTHER FILTH INSTEAD!

Fuck hell you guys are tards.

At least Trump pretend to act like he's something new, it's either him or the rest of the boring paste that keep feeding people over and over.

I'd rather take a chance with him, can't be worse than what we already had.

>>139173

He will sell us out to the global corporations in a heartbeat. Plus he's killed how many of his own ventures?

Trump ran a casino into the ground. He's not qualified to run a lemonade stand.

>>139177

>>139178

>Plus he's killed how many of his own venturesTrump ran a casino into the ground. He's not qualified to run a lemonade stand.?

>

He has had lots of businesses. Sometimes businesses fail. It's a lot of randomness and hit and miss. If you have enough some will fail.

He is, however, doing quite well. I don't know about statistics from further back in time, but during the last 5 years his net worth has increased with a factor > 1.5. That's impressive.

www.forbes.com/profile/donald-trump/

>>139177

>He will sell us out to the global corporations in a heartbeat.

>Implying the rest won't.

>>139179

Yes. His personal wealth. The companies he tends to drive into a ditch. Have you ever seen The Producers? You can make money while failing.

>>139181

It is a great business model but obviously not good for the employees. It is very common among the Chinese. Start a company, hire people, take money from it, then run it into the ground. The bosses make good profit.

>>139181

I assume his goal with his corperation is to make money, thus it is not a faliure.

It's possible that you can make money while failing (I don't know how this would go over in the long run, but it's possible that you're right). My comment was directed to two people who pointed out that he "ran a casino into the ground" and that he killed many of his own ventures.

What I meant was that if you're going to look at how successful his corperations are, you can't just look at if one or two corperations have failed. Even if you show that he has crashed 100 corperations, there might be 1000 which he has not crashed. You have to look at the general trends of the average corperation owned by him, rather than just the absolute number of crashed corperations.

If you want to claim it makes him incompetent, as >>139178 seems to imply, rather than just oppertunistic (or whatever you would like to call it), as you seem to claim, you also have to show that the corperations failed because of incompetence. Otherwise, I'd actually count his experience as a plus — I'd rather elect someone who is experienced with business deals and knows some of the things which makes corperations fail than someone who knows nothing about business.

This trump guy is proof that any man can become a millionaire…………as long as they have millionaire parents

ITT: butthurt libtards

>>139217

So it would seem.

>>139233

That video is related to claims such as >>137605.

>>139217

More like delighted libtards.

The Donald is godsend to Hillary. If that idiot doesn't shut his mouth soon, Repubs (and America) is toast.

>>139325

…and then there's really nothing to stop things going from bad to worse and eventually having the US ending up with a President Sarkeesian.

>>139233

He looks like Barney Frank

This will be my first election voting if Hilary is the opposition and I'll be voting not for her so I hope to shit that it's him so at least my vote can go to something hilarious

I'm tossin' it to Sanders. Not because I think he could possibly pull off half the shit he claims he would, but because he's the only one who doesn't make bile rise in my throat when I think about him.

>>141793

>Actually voting for Bernie Sanders

You must be 18 or older to post here, kid.

>>141797

I am. Like I said, I expect nothing to come of it, plus I'm about to go abroad for a few years and he's the one I find the least disgusting of the choices. The presidential nominees this year are all shit.

>>141767

>Trump literally does shit for lulz

/pol/ was right again

>>141797

There are plenty of adults who like Bernie Sanders. Not all Democrats are war hawks like Hillary.

>>141793

If he had a chance, I might actually bother to vote but most likely not. I can't stand Hilary, Trump or any of the others.

>>128821

That's pretty dumb, but it makes sense in practice. A carbon tax isn't going to save the earth, but it will inhibit business.

>>141793

>a zionist communist

>only one who doesn't make bile rise in my throat when I think about him

>>>/leftypol/

>>150590

He is not a Zionist. That is the irony of it all. Also socialist isn't communist.

Because he is Jewish you assume he's a Zionist? He's not even really Jewish. He's a Semite who happens to be a socialist.

>/pol/ supports a Hillary plant

Lol. Can't wait till /pol/ backfires in supporting him.

>>150656

Trump is a Hilary plant? How?

>>150667

Because he's retarded enough to believe one of the most retarded Alex Jones conspiracy ever conceived, or more likely he's trolling.

>>150667

Trump used to run as an independent. Back then he was pro-choice and in favor of gun control. A few years ago he changed all his positions and started running as a Republican.

At the same time he's donated millions of dollars to both Clintons over the years, as well as Harry Reid, Anthony Weiner, and numerous other Democrats. None of this is conspiracy theory, it's all documented fact, and his only answer to the charges have been "I've evolved on the issues" "I thought they would be a good senator for New York" and "I love the Clintons, I'm good friends with them."

Trump runs as a spoiler candidate, he's done this in the last two elections. He's there to draw crucial support from the other candidates. This isn't the single factor, but it's part of why Republicans have lost the last two elections. They can never rally behind a single candidate. So he draws a certain amount of support, and then bows out and doesn't endorse anybody. He said in the last debate he wouldn't endorse any of the other candidates, and if he doesn't get the nomination he might run as an independent.

So let's say 30% of the Republicans support him, despite all of this information. Then he drops out or goes independent. That's a divided voter base that isn't excited about any of the other candidates.

We saw this happen with Romney. In every poll he never got higher than second place. It went state by state, and every time there was another frontrunner something would knock them out. First there was the female candidate, can't remember her name, but she made some dumb comment about vaccines causing autism and her support evaporated. Then Herman Cain was number one for a while. Then some woman came out of the woodwork claiming he sexually assaulted her, and he was questioned about foreign policy and he revealed he didn't know where any of the countries in the Middle East were and his support evaporated. For a sliver of time Newt Gingrich was the frontrunner, then he made some comments people didn't like and his support dwindled. And on it went until Romney was simply the last man standing, and you had a bunch of dispassionate voters going "Well, I *guess* I'll vote for him."

>>150711

He basically just makes everybody miserable, then?

>>138881

Oh hey it's Arthur Chu's nerdy brother.

/cow/ for president.

>>128828

this. and its not like he isn't trying to make himself look good. he is. thats what the fake tan, botox and hair dye is for. thats what the fancy suits and the shoes are for. he's trying and miserably failing. he looks awful.

>>128808

Is it true he wanted Mexico to pay for Americas border?

Trump is a fucking amazing troll candidate. If he gets elected, the country is gonna burn, but at least we'll go down laughing.

I will say that the /pol/ support of him is massively hypocritical. Trump's really pro-Israel, >b-but all the candidates have to suck circumcised cock

Somewhat true, but Trump goes the extra mile. He straight up endorsed Netanyahu's re-election, even though he wasn't currently considering an office run.

>>138878

>voting for Jesse Ventura

>calling people stupid enough to be killed for the benefit of humanity

He's a reality TV star. No wonder he's good at campaigning.

trump 2016

Trump is a weird mix of a troll and a cow. He's trolling the left hard but at the same time he once tried to sue Bill Maher because he was butthurt that he called his mother an orangutan.

>>185638

You have to be a bit of a cow to be a great troll, though. If you can't be bothered by stupid shit, how can you really fuck with people. Also, can't Stump the Trump.

>>186692

Can you translate that into Arabic or Spanish?

>>186695

How would Spanish be funny at the moment?

I'm too lazy to read the thread or find the pics, but basically I came here to say that Trump appears to have turned quite a few liberal media commentators into lowlcows. There's some "before/after" trump image that comes up on /pol/ from time to time.

I genuinely believe that there's at least a half dozen relatively high profile lolcows ripe for the julaying. The intensity is reaching its peak, so /cow/ might want to get interested in this soon.

>Anonymous has just launched an operation targetting Donald Trump.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSnOwUE5Fro

God dam, Chanology fucked up so hard that we're still paying the price.

>>186932

> /pol/ supports the troll candidate and personal god of Patrick Bateman while /cow/ is talking about wanting to vote for Bernie and Hillary and babbling about climate change like parrots?

A couple of faggots don't speak for all of us. Besides, it looks like the berniecucks fucked off months ago.

>>186943

chanology was a mistake

i'm voting trump because your vote literally has no worth and the next president will be decided by party leaders and their corporate liaisons

so i might as well vote for the guy that makes liberals cry.

You know whats ironic? I had to stand that dumbfuck retard bush for most of my teens and yet I would vote trump in a second because the libtards that came with obama and are currently holding the entire western hemisphere hostage are a billion times worse than aughts neocons were

And yes I'm aware it will probably backfire as bad as obama did

>>137366

Source on the first pic? context?

I pity those who have just tuned into his campaign.

It's been months of banter and IRL shitposting from Trump against the other candidates, news media, and anyone else who tried to step up against him.

Just wait until next year, it's going to be good; links related, it's shitposts disguised as campaign ads.

https://www.instagram.com/p/-bz5HWGhXZ/

https://www.instagram.com/p/_FN2L3GhZi/

I pity those who have just tuned into his campaign.

It's been months of banter and IRL shitposting from Trump against the other candidates, news media, and anyone else who tried to step up against him.

Just wait until next year, it's going to be good; links related, it's shitposts disguised as campaign ads.

https://www.instagram.com/p/-bz5HWGhXZ/

https://www.instagram.com/p/_FN2L3GhZi/

Also:

Hey, Ivan:

http://www.abc17news.com/news/fbi-investigating-suspicious-purchase-at-columbia-walmart/36877514

Phones bought in bulk? Obviously only holiday gifts and not clearly bought to use as disposables or as remote detonators and triggers.

I know you aren't anywhere near Missouri, but thought you'd appreciate seeing some news like this.

Looks like Anonymous has entered the fray:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/12046183/Anonymous-releases-videos-attacking-Donald-Trump-as-part-of-OpTrump.html

https://archive.is/jKVRV

Is Trump and GG the universal boogeyman of retards? I mean, you have people just mentioning them for no apparent reason whatsoever. J.K. Rowlin g had to make a few statements on how Trump is apparently worse than Voldemort, despite Voldemort being pretty much Wizard Hitler while Trump is shit stirrer.

Another funny thing is that the standard SJW crew is now obscenely butthurt about "Islamophobia" now. People calling out the whole situation in Britain where police officers let pedos and slavers run free while arresting parents to not seem racist. Apparently it is white supremacy to be against pedophiles and rapists if they are muslim. Also Milo is now considered not gay as he is homophobic for making fun of how hypocritical that GX3 event is.

https://archive.is/gvNJZ