[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/cow/ - Lolcows (Merry Satanmas!)

Autism speaks. It's time to listen.

Catalog

See 8chan's new software in development (discuss) (help out)
Infinity Next update (Jan 4 2016)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Bunker boards.
Rules, email, feed, mods, archive.
Main Chat (QChat, Mibbit, KiwiIRC, stats).
Special Chat (QChat, Mibbit, KiwiIRC, stats).

File: 1438785487342.webm (Spoiler Image, 6.7 MB, 640x360, 16:9, feminism101.webm)

d7ca8f No.146756

>real name: Miriam Weeks

>feminist

>gets a job to pay for college

>job is porn

>her major is women studies

>cost: $60k

>went with full hardcore abuse-porn

>gets chocked with a dick and slapped until she cries

>still saying it empowers her

>complaints about the wage gap despite women in porn making many times over what males do

Here's her defense for being a colossal retarded slut:

>Why does the thought of a woman having sexual experiences scare us so much? The answer is simple. Patriarchy fears female sexuality.It terrifies us to even fathom that a woman could take ownership of her body. We deem to keep women in a place where they are subjected to male sexuality. We seek to rob them of their choice and of their autonomy. We want to oppress them and keep them dependent on the patriarchy. A woman who transgresses the norm and takes ownership of her body — because that’s exactly what porn is, no matter how rough the sex is — ostensibly poses a threat to the deeply ingrained gender norms that polarize our society.I am well aware: The threat I pose to the patriarchy is enormous. That a woman could be intelligent, educated and CHOOSE to be a sex worker is almost unfathomable.

To the left some of her "sociology work"

d7ca8f No.146759

File: 1438785697234.webm (Spoiler Image, 5.31 MB, 640x480, 4:3, belle_1.webm)

More of her work


d7ca8f No.146760

File: 1438785776123.webm (Spoiler Image, 5.72 MB, 640x480, 4:3, belle_2.webm)

2/4


d7ca8f No.146761

File: 1438785837920.webm (Spoiler Image, 5.61 MB, 640x480, 4:3, belle_3.webm)

3/4


d7ca8f No.146762

File: 1438785948037.webm (Spoiler Image, 6.34 MB, 640x480, 4:3, belle_4.webm)

4/4, last one


ead007 No.146766

>>146756

>Hating on a feminist because she's a porn star

>Not hating on a porn star because she's a feminist

What a dickless faggot.


d7ca8f No.146774

>>146766

>hating

>not laughing at her stupidity

Back to sucking cock you go


b2d61c No.146777

>>146756

the Mayli video was better she was actually into it


d7ca8f No.146802

>>146777

Haven't seen it nor care to, I don't really find her attractive at all and that pure undiluted idiocy combined with the lack of self-awareness its just astounding

Of course most SJWs are exactly like that, the difference if they don't make a career out of swallowing cum on video (well not most…)


9efd9d No.146817

>>146756

Why is Facialabuse so fucking based?


6ac16f No.146839

I remember watching a clip on efukt where another "casting couch" style site was interviewing her right before they fucked her.

The camera guy was calling her out on all her shit, saying that she's working in an industry where women get paid significantly more and get more work. She sort of froze up and began mumbling something about how it's just the free market at work and it's okay when women benefit.

I dunno if she really qualifies as a lolcow though. Most pornstars are pretty fucked in the head from most accounts.


d39bda No.146865

>>146802

Mayli's a different girl. A skinny half white half asian girl with giant teeth. There's some pictures of her floating around with her family and doing stuff like playing piano at her church. She did two porn videos on two of the most extreme sites she possibly could have, and then went into obscurity.

A year later she got kicked out of college for selling pot on campus.


d39bda No.146882

File: 1438806201980-0.jpg (372.5 KB, 1282x720, 641:360, 1438415894538.jpg)

File: 1438806201981-1.jpg (338.52 KB, 1458x1164, 243:194, feministslol.jpg)

So, why is this so common with feminists? It's a pretty widely held stereotype. All these angry, dykey girls screeching about wanting to destroy the patriarchy put themselves in situations where they're dominated, spit on abused and facefucked for money.


6ac16f No.146892

>>146882

The same reason /pol/ has an obsession with interracial cuckold porn.

People project and lash out over shit that they hate about themselves.


01272a No.146943

The porn money didn't go towards school. That was just her excuse for being a whore. Her parents are surgeons and her father even came out and said he was paying all her tuition and costs. They stopped giving her extra spending money because she was wasting it on shit like designer shoes and handbags so she started doing porn to pay for it.


ae6fb7 No.147306

>>146892

Can you find one example of someone from pole actually being into interracial cuckold porn or is this just a dank meme?


8de839 No.147320


2d1c8d No.147386

File: 1438840210297.jpg (7.3 KB, 154x82, 77:41, belle knox.jpg)

>implying someone can be a lolcow if I've fapped to them


0efc1b No.147538

i mean

she took that fucking like a champ, she's great at her job

what are we going to do to milk a girl who's living the dream and is quite possibly milked irl for pleasure anyway

what's happening to you op, why would you post this instant failure of a thread


0cc001 No.147549

>>146882

>second pic

My eyes have been awakened. Guiltiness and inability to accept one's mistake leads to Dumb Bitch Syndrome.


d7ca8f No.147598

>>147320

Holy shit that guy just goes fucking all-in, his criticism its spot-on and undiluted, love it


d7ca8f No.147600

>>147538

I told you to go suck a dick, bitch it's stupid as fuck, did it for the money and now wants to claim soggyknees


2d1c8d No.147644

she's probably too famous from being all over the media for this to work, but it would be pretty funny to edit together the most violent-looking clips, put some filters on them and crop it so it looks like a cell phone video taken by someone who doesn't know to turn the damn phone 90 degrees, and see how many screeching harpies get triggered before somebody realizes it's not an actual rape video.

there are plenty of other facialabuse scenes, also a lot of kink.com shit would trigger their fellow san franciscans


21169c No.147645

File: 1438893196736.png (18.61 KB, 267x302, 267:302, 1399778008595.png)

So let me get this straight, if a girl goes and shoots a scene for one of the most degrading porn sites like Facial Abuse its not degrading its empowerment. But if she shoots a scene for X-Art or Bangbros then its degrading?


2d1c8d No.147649

>>147645

seems like she regrets that one:

https://archive.is/ry40h

>Not only is Marks a slim brunette who could be my sister, she is also eerily semi-recreating one of my earliest scenes which was for a rough sex website (I will not give the company any more publicity than they’ve already received).


300086 No.147670

File: 1438896657890.webm (Spoiler Image, 6.75 MB, 320x240, 4:3, pol directs a porno.webm)

Where was the guy in .webm related when she needed him most?


2d1c8d No.147747

File: 1438904092216.webm (Spoiler Image, 470.32 KB, 640x480, 4:3, jet jaguar.webm)

>>147670

somebody didn't have their headphones on when watching the webbums upthread.


300086 No.147776

>>147747

>Implying I watched anything in this thread


2ced6b No.150330

>>146817

>implying it's not scripted.


f54dff No.150348

File: 1439372123028.jpg (Spoiler Image, 25.59 KB, 630x333, 70:37, duke-pornstar-feminist.jpg)

>>146882

>that bent duck

wtf dude?


2d1c8d No.150715

>>150348

>>146882

that "Aeryn Walker" person is a tranny right?


fe8b52 No.150719

>>146756

It's even better when you know she actually had full scholarships for Carnegie University and still went to Duke and shot porn.

Oh yeah, and before she was outed publicly already held talks about "being a sex worker" at LGBTWTFBBQ events at her Uni.

>>146839

You can see her cutting scars in many photos.

>>146865

She's trained as a classical pianist, her family is from New York and loaded as hell. She later did her Masters at another uni if I remember right.

It seems doing depraved sexual shit is some sort of rebellion these rich sheltered girl indulge in. A less crass example would be Lady Gaga who wnt stripping before her carreer. For reference she was in the same class as Paris Hilton.


d39bda No.150725

>>150715

Nah, just Australian.


edb818 No.150726

>>150719

Nigger I would kill people to be reborn into a rich family to learn cool and neat skills. If you're born into a rich family, how the hell do you fuck up this bad?


2d1c8d No.150728

File: 1439465701771.jpg (312.88 KB, 847x1599, 847:1599, trashmother.jpg)

>>150719

>A less crass example would be Lady Gaga

girls who go on facialabuse are much more respectable than that walking queef


e6d8fe No.150737

i hate her for that opie and anthony interview, ruined an entire day of lady di


00fc2a No.150778

>>147670

Holy fucking shit that's a terrible video. Hentai-senpai is being such a god damn moralfag holy shit. I need a cheese pizza now.


cc6668 No.150939

>>150737

I hate when they bring porn stars on the radio at all. Nobody likes them for their speaking ability.


d7ca8f No.150952

>>150726

Same here, not a poorfag but there are a lot of things I wish I could've done but couldn't because it was all rich-tier


8de839 No.150959

>>147320

For those too lazy to download:

SEX-POSITIVE.

I hate the term to the point where “HIV-positive” sounds good by comparison. Imagine how imbecilic someone would sound if they campaigned for “food-positive” attitudes. Come to thinkof it, I’m feeling highly “air-positive” today, too. And I feel we all could afford to be a little more “water-positive.” Why don’t we all strive to foment more “feces-positive” platitudes while we’re at it? “Sex-positive” might be the dumbest hyphenated term ever concocted. Almost without fail, anyone who employs the term “sex-positive” is someone with whom I would positively not want to have sex. Surveying the sad specimens of sex-positivity, it’s almost as if they prattle about sex in the hopes that you’ll mistake the messenger for the message and wind up so confused that you finally consent to having sex with them. And perhaps that is their true agenda, because nothing else they say makes any sense.They’ll lecture you about how our society hammers sex-negative notions into your head, just as it conditions you to be a racist and a homophobe, but any honest look at our media would reveal all such allegations to be ass-backwards. Homos and nonwhites have reached the status of pop-culture saints. And sex may have been frowned upon a couple generations ago, but everything is porno these days. If the media—and the general culture to whom they dictate values—was sex-negative, they wouldn’t use sex to sell everything. Ironically, the reputedly “sex-negative” Überkultur makes sex seem far more appealing than the sex-positivists do. It doesn’t matter if you’re blabbing ad nauseam about sex when the WAY you’re phrasing it is devastatingly unsexy. With the sex-positivists, it’s almost as if the TONE of their verbiage sends out sonic waves scientifically engineered to wilt erections and wither vaginas. For me, sex-positive translates into boner-negative. I’ve been called “sex-negative” by people whom I’d reckon have less sex in a year than I do in a week. Therefore, I am sex-negative…and proud! I am, of course, not truly sex-negative, at least not when I’m the one having sex. But I’ve adopted “sex-negative” in the same way that many “Satanists” don’t believe in Satan but hijack the term merely to piss off Christians.The organ-grinders of sex-positivity parrot the same tired list of sanctimonious phrases, a canon of perhaps the most annoying terminology ever created. Bi-curious human Papsmears fueling ongoing growth through informed dialogues and consensual slavery. Radical affirmations. Transformative sexuality.Transgendered body-mod pincushions and legless fire-dancers and roly-poly polyamory. Safewords and dark Tantra and kinky crafts and learning to venerate your clit. BDSM potluck dinners. Daisy-chain prostate milking and vegan pizza feeds. A smarmy wormdressed for Halloween in a papier-mâché rendering of the Herpes Simplex IIvirus. Fat acceptance. Way too muchacceptance. Activism and enrichment and nurturing and community-building orientation workshops where everyone walks out so empowered, their fucking heads explode.


8de839 No.150961

Most of the cloying, astringent, rankly pharisaical lizard dung that passes itself off as “sex writing” these days manages to infuse the subject with a piety often eclipsing that of the Christian censors against whom they’re ostensibly rebelling. Their words generate more bullshit than a bull farm. Their prose is shot through with such penis-shriveling, vagina-drying holiness, they might as well be talking about aboriginal class struggle or hard abdominal masses.One would be hard-pressed to find a group of people at once sillier and who takes themselves more seriously.

They declare themselves “experts” in many cases for no other reason than the fact that they’ve declared themselves experts. These self-appointed “professionals” and “activists” aren’t helping to accomplish anything except to make themselves feel important. Has any of their “literature” freed even ONE person from Puritanism’s rusty shackles? Methinks not, ye salty bucka-roos, methinks not. In most cases, they sound more like cult members than professionals, anyway. No matter what their formal training, they’re unnecessary middlemen—brokers who charge a fee, and that fee is your natural-born enjoyment of sex. They’re like college professors who try to explain the mechanics of a joke rather than actually being funny themselves.The bulk of them, naturally, come from protected backgrounds—the cream of repressed society—yet they think it’s daring to write about sex a good 50 years after it ceased being legally dangerous to do so.

They are invariably rich white people who think they have insight about race and class. They also think they understand sex, although rich white Americans are possibly less adept at the sex act than anyone else on Earth. Many of them survive on donations and grants, while the rest of us actually work for a living. The Pacific Northwest is a place where no one starves, no one is poor, and yet everyone still manages to feel oppressed. What is it about having a trust fund that makes you think you’re Third World?

THE QUINTESSENTIAL EXAMPLE of what I’m driving at here regarding the inescapably nausea-inducing properties of sex-positivity is an e-mailed invitation I once saw from a Blue Ribbon-winning sex writer who calls herself Darklady. The invitation was for one of the “naughty” and “depraved” group-grope parties she’s always throwing in Portland. It made a point of stressing that the event would be “wheelchair-accessible.” WHEELCHAIR-ACCESSIBLE!!!

Now, I wouldn’t mind watching the wheelchair-bound having sex due to some sick curiosity on my part—or merely for a laugh—but the invitation’s unavoidable implication was that it’s both POSITIVE and SEXY for these gimps to toss themselves onto the naked pink hog-pile. That one invitation encapsulates everything that’s wrong with sex-positivity. When you’re too tolerant, it’s only proof that you have no taste. What person with the tiniest scrap of discernment would think sex is good no matter who’s doing it?

Sex is not always positive. It carries potential danger, both physically and emotionally. A huge part of the FUN is that it’s risky. Safe sex? Count me out


8de839 No.150962

BITING THE WHORE THAT FED ME

Portland, Oregon. An emerald paradise tucked 'tween snowcapped mountains and roaring ocean. Icy rain and steamin' coffee. The world's fattest junkies, hairiest dykes and most passive-aggressive liberals. Plus more strippers, call girls and self-described "sex workers" than any place should rightfully have.

Everything you need to know about the city is distilled in the fact that it has only one daily paper, two free weeklies and three free strip-club magazines.

Those who make their living in the city's sex industry?an estimated 2000 strippers alone?call the town "Pornland." Legend has it, there are more titty bars here than anywhere on Earth. When I first moved to P-Town nearly 10 years ago, it seemed as if there was a strip bar on each corner. It's almost as if Rudy Giuliani had used a giant broom to sweep all the sex shops out of 42nd St., and they all landed way out here in Bigfoot Country.

Nowhere on Earth, with the possible exception of Annie Sprinkle's dungeon, does pornography struggle so boldly to paint itself in redemptive, artistic, community-building, "sex-positive" strokes. Pornland's porn apologists go one step further than trying to make it respectable. They make it cutting-edge? empowering, even. No other city on Earth more aggressively nurtures the idea that taking off one's clothes in a dark smoky bar filled with swollen prostates automatically qualifies one as an artist, or at least a "sex worker," rather than a stripper or, Goddess forbid, a whore.

Obviously, taking off your clothes doesn't make you an artist any more than taking a shit does. Sure, I realize that even a sanitation worker is capable of performing his job with some measure of grace and nobility?but he's still a trashman. One can pick their nose with a certain degree of finesse, too?but they're still picking their nose.

If there's one thing more retarded than pornography, it's the attempted intellectualization of pornography. Porn is theorized to death up here. Most of the "literature" that attends Portland's sex industry is glutted with fatuous, transparent, misguided screeds about our "rights" and "free speech" and "pro-sex attitudes," and "educating society," as if leaving a trail of Twat Slime up and down a brass pole was not only the ultimate act of artistic expression, but also of political commentary. Whores magically become goddesses, proving that the only thing more ridiculous than arguing that pornography objectifies women is trying to argue that it doesn't.

Not to mention the starkly ironic fact that pornography and "sex-positivity" are natural enemies. Pornography actually depends on the partial suppression of sexuality, or nude chicks wouldn't be so special that people would pay to see them. The most farcical thing about this whole "sex-positive" crusade among sex workers is that if people were truly sex-positive, meaning sexually healthy and functional, the industry would disappear. Fat, flaccid old men with cockeyed toupees wouldn't be throwing dollars at 18-year-old meth-addicted runaways with snare-drum-tight skin and shaved-bald beavers.


8de839 No.150963

Still, to fend off the fundamentalists and the local DA, this amorphous mass of pimps, hoze and johns that calls itself "the industry" has to justify itself. To survive, it must struggle to appear "classy" in the same way the habitual sinner strains to appear righteous. Therefore, it must pretend it's something that it isn't. Flipping through these free strip-club magazines, it's astonishing how often the word "classy" pops up in the ads for strip clubs, lingerie-modeling emporia (known affectionately as "jack shacks") and call girls. One escort service calls itself "Classy Ass," and if ever two words didn't belong together, it is these two. But that epitomizes the industry?it sells ass, but with a thick, phony lacquer of "class."

The industry floats atop a fluffy pillow of fantasy. Chief among these fantasies:

The strippers have to pretend they like the johns.

The johns have to pretend the strippers like them, too.

Sorry, but I just can't pretend. Strippers don't create anything that lasts. There is no message in their performances besides "Guys like to look at my crotch." And I'm supposed to respect them? To view them as goddesses? As artists? How many of them could draw a stick figure or write a sentence? How many of their brains could burp up one?just one?original idea? Their entire job is to prey upon men's lonely vulnerability and suck money from their pockets.

You can paint a turd all you want, but you're still selling gash for cash.

I'm a man of strange tastes. I generally find that there's nothing less funny than a comedian and nothing less arousing than pornography. .

Porn held a fascination for me when I was 12 and had never seen a live, breathing vagina, but once I actually started having sex, pornography seemed degrading. And not to the girls?to me. Why should I pay for something I can get for free? I've never paid a dollar for sex in my life. I've never even bought a porno mag.

To me, sex is instantly corrupted when money enters the equation. I'm not sex-negative, but it might be fair to call me cash-negative. As I see it, sex is cheapened and distorted and, most important, rendered dishonest by money. That's what money does to everything.

I don't object to porn for prudish reasons, nor would I argue that sex without cash is necessarily uplifting. I hate pornography for overwhelmingly esthetic reasons. I'm not saying it's immoral. But it is artificial, and that's much, much worse. It isn't bad and evil. It's silly and tacky. Strippers and the men who ogle them shouldn't feel guilty; they should feel foolish.

By and large, porn is stupid. Bad shitrock and bad haircuts and bad childhoods and bad, bad, bad taste. It's all a joke, told at its own expense. Pornography is little more than "Reality TV" without clothes.


8de839 No.150964

So I was only 10 days free after a two-and-a-half-year prison stretch for domestic violence against a Portland girl who was more violent than me…She was a stripper when I met her. Before I got out, a friend had told me that ex-cons, no matter how much time they had spent locked down, almost immediately sense upon their release that their prison experience happened a thousand years ago and a million miles away.

He was right. The prison world, so alien to me when I entered it, became instantly foreign again upon my exit.

A writer friend had directed me to a local publisher of a free sex-industry magazine distributed in the billions of nude bars, jack shacks and dildo huts that blemish Portland's visage like so many Kaposi's sarcoma dots. There is at least one of these sort of rags in every major city. Their ads-to-editorial ratio is typically, oh, about 90-to-1, and what meager editorial cocks exists is pure industry-promoting Cool Whip designed to make you patronize the advertisers.

The free Portland sex mag in question was a notch above the competition, mainly because the publisher is a gracious and noble man, and his essential decency somehow leached into the magazine's pages. He was also a fan of my writing and created a job for me because he knew full-time employment was a condition of my parole. Unfortunately, the editorial situation I inherited was awash with insufferably righteous "sex-positive" folderol cranked out by writers who, if their homeliness was any indication, spent a lot more time writing about sex than actually having it.

The magazine's office was located on Burnside St., downtown near the river in the sleaziest part of Portland, a three- or four-square-block chunk that is the city's only remotely urban sector. Homeless alcoholics with snot and blood encrusted in their gray beards. Black whores in stretch pants picking at scabs on their exposed bellies. A jack shack was located on the floor above us, and a nightclub that sometimes featured topless dancers was right below us.

A constant flow of drugs and thong-wearing 18-year-old call girls coursed through the office. Tattooed strippers would excuse themselves in the middle of photo shoots to go hit the meth pipe in the bathroom. And there was so much dried DNA on the backroom couch you could start a new civilization with it.

Despite the steady stream of naked cunt that swirled around me at this job, I had no desire to fuck any of these girls, or, saints preserve us, to shovel down under their makeup and silicone to see if anything human lay beneath it all. The only interesting thing about most of them was that they were fucked up enough to get naked for cash?beyond that, they were as subnormally unexceptional as your average prison convict. Most of them displayed a hatred for men that can only come from constant exposure to how low and desperate and sweaty most men can be when nature has left them no other option but to pay for sex.

Almost all female "sex workers" seemed to hate the men for whom they were paid to preen and smile?and this was never considered "biting the hand that feeds them." The more these miserable shlubs worshipped and idealized the strippers, the more the strippers mocked them. One busy lady who worked as a stripper, jack-shack model and call girl told me in confidence that she enjoys the power she feels over these poor tricks. She enjoyed humiliating them and made no mention that her job might be degrading to her. She thought, like I do, that it's much more degrading for the tricks.

Who came up with the insane idea that it's more degrading to be paid for sex than to pay for it?


8de839 No.150965

For all the fuzzy postmodern cunt-positive rhetoric about how hazardous this business is for women, none of these girls ever seemed to face remotely the same sort of legal hassles and prison time that their employers did. Oregon's legal system tends to overprotect females, even predatory ones. In the two years I worked there, I never saw one girl get busted for prostitution, but their bosses kept getting slapped with one sex-crime charge after the next.

I witnessed one case where a willful, oversexed, violent 16-year-old who wanted to be a "sex worker" so badly that she provided false ID to a jack-shack owner wound up being considered the victim, and the owner, even though he was acting in good faith, went to jail for promoting child prostitution.

So I developed a hearty contempt for all these goddess-artists. I despised the johns, too, but my loathing was tempered with some bemused pity. I didn't pity the girls. I didn't see how sex workers were any more exploited than any other worker. And I sure as fuck couldn't feel sorry for girls who earned in a five-hour shift what I made in a week.

So I'll be the first to admit that I was inappropriate for the job. The magazine became a Trojan horse inside which I crouched, ready to pillage the industry. I was paid a living wage to bite the whore that fed me. I was allowed an almost unconscionable amount of editorial leeway, and I stretched it every time. It was as if a monkey had taken over the controls and was pushing all the red buttons. Like a tomcat playing with cockroaches, I systematically fired one sex-positive columnist after the next, then made a public mockery of them in the following issue.

I replaced them with writers whose abilities I admired, but I still wound up writing more than half of every issue myself. I called my monthly column "The Industry" and designed a logo for it that featured a toxin-belching smokestack. I ended my first column with a joke:

Q: What were "sex workers" called 30 years ago?

A: Whores.

I'm not sure how Webster's defines it, but for me, the word "whore" has two meanings:

Someone who trades their sexuality for cash.

Someone who does something they don't want to do for cash.

I was writing exactly what I wanted to write, so I didn't consider myself a whore. I couldn't write about the sex industry with any degree of honest respect, so I relentlessly lampooned it. The magazine's non-ad cocks became a weird hybrid of Hustler and The Onion.

Titles of some of my feature articles:

"Adult Films Made by Children"

"What's With All the Lesbians?"

"Man Uses Photoshop to Give Himself a Bigger Penis?And it WORKS!"

"Ex-Slaves Sue Dominatrix for Reparations"

"Home Breast-Implant Kits"

"Penis Sizes of World Religious Figures"

"Virgin Mary's Face Appears in Wet Spot"

"A Night at Stinky's?The Strip Club Where Women Are PAID to Get DRESSED"

"What About Us??A Support Group Forms to Address the Unique Emotional Needs of Strippers Who Were Never Abused as Children"

"The Herbal Date-Rape Drug"

"Priest Turns Confession Booth into 'Erotic Lingerie Modeling Booth for Boys'"

I also wrote the story line for a serial comic strip called "Trucker Fags in Denial."


8de839 No.150966

The writers I hired weren't much kinder to the industry. "I Hate Sex" and "The Cum-Hungry Genius" were columns written by females who routinely took potshots at pimps, johns and hoze. The author of the latter column called one of her monthly installments "Female Castration is Where it's At."

The magazine created an understandable buzz. People were reading it, but their demographic barely overlapped with those who patronized our sponsors. The readership and the target advertising audience were not the same group and may even have been at odds with each other. People in the industry didn't know what to make of it all, and most of them, dumb bricks that they are, took it at face value. We received countless phone calls requesting directions to Stinky's nightclub.

Our competitors tried to use the editorial cocks against us, wooing advertisers with the notion that these articles, rather than all the jack-shack ads that surrounded them, were unforgivably sleazy.

About six months ago, I hired someone whose pen name was "Office Partridge" to write a column called "Hard Justice." He's the son of a fairly well-known feminist author, and maybe he's still rebelling against Mom a little bit. It was less than a month ago that he handed me a column whose lede was, "Strippers are garbage." He continued:

Uh, excuse me, ma'am? Could you get your fucking life out of my way? I'm trying to look up your asshole. Thanks. I can look at the place on your body that shit comes out of. Anytime I want. For a dollar. And you have feelings? I can see your pooper! Is this a joke?

Youch. Truer words were never spoken in the magazine, but the context couldn't have been less appropriate. "It's as if we did a magazine with ads for coffee machines," said one of our designers, "and every article was about how much coffee machines suck." I grimaced, knowing the article would cause trouble. Then I ran it.

It caused more trouble than I anticipated. I was unaware that many of these strippers were able to read, but apparently they can. All the whores responded with the sort of outrage peculiar to those who've been hurt by the truth, the oddly familiar shock that comes when the obvious is articulated clearly for the first time. If you aren't really whores?if we didn't really hit a nerve?if you weren't really ashamed deep down of what you were doing?then why are you freaking the fuck out?

Fanning the fire, our competitors trotted the article around to our advertisers, who began threatening to pull their ads. Without consulting me, our publisher yanked the offending article from the magazine's online version, replacing it with a bent-over-backwards apology, now also gone. He wrote that we'd convened an emergency editorial meeting in which the staff expressed shock and dismay that this article, which was supposedly handed in at the last minute, flew in under our radar and somehow got published. He wrote that Officer Partridge would never write for us again. He wrote that we'd never publish anything like it again. He wrote that the next issue would be chock-full of apologies and sundry expressions of our bottomless remorse for ever suggesting that women who trade sex for cash are whores.

There were several problems with what the publisher wrote. First among them was the fact that this "meeting" had never occurred. Another was that the article was handed in way before deadline. By foisting all the blame onto Officer Partridge, the publisher was offering me an easy way out. If I, too, pretended to be shocked and outraged, my job was secure.

But I couldn't do it. The problem, by and large, was that I agreed with the article. I wouldn't apologize for all the money in the world.

That's because I ain't a ho.


8de839 No.150967

So I quit…As I was clearing out my desk, two whores from the jack shack upstairs came down to "confront" me, only to be further outraged when they realized I wouldn't apologize. No, honey, you aren't a whore. You stand in a cubicle sticking dildos up your ass for cash while some schmuck watches you and beats off, but you're not a whore.

The magazine's staff is still scrambling to repair the damage. They've hand-delivered written apologies to all the clubs and jack shacks and have hired three Mexicans armed with box cutters to remove the offending article from all remaining copies. They hired a sex-positive stripper to replace me.

I never got to write that advice column for Islamic sex workers. Nor the feature about "Sharkey's," the mythical strip club on Oahu's north end that features nothing but strippers who are victims of shark bites.

Funny? No one said we were "biting the hand that feeds us" when we repeatedly made sport of johns, whose money greases the entire industry. One female columnist routinely wrote fantasies about murdering men who she felt had inappropriately drooled over her. In the same issue as the offending "Hard Justice" column, she gleefully and remorselessly wrote about a real incident where she'd punched some guy so hard she had pieces of his flesh stuck to her hands. And no one was offended by that. Nor did anyone object to the same issue's "I Hate Sex" column, which was an extended murder fantasy regarding a man who had committed the murder-worthy crime of stealing the author's panties. Without a hint of irony, both of these articles openly advocated violence toward johns, while "Hard Justice" merely made unflattering comments about strippers.

Such are the dangers of goddess culture? The girls get away with murder, while brimstone rains down upon males who shit his pants and do nothing worse than infer that girls are less than sacred.

It's all further proof that one can never tell the truth in a medium driven by advertising.

I spent almost as much time in the porn industry as I did in the Big House. It's been less than a week since I left, but it already feels like 1000 years ago.

Just like prison.


39fe28 No.150972

>>147670

>Hooker with a tattoo of a dead hooker stuffed in a trashcan on her

Perfect.


32102a No.151037

> I was unaware that many of these strippers were able to read, but apparently they can.

LOL


663bba No.151048

>>147538

fuck off you degenerate SJW piece of shit. wait till the day of the rope, you and your tumblr friends will get rekt


713e7e No.151050

>>150959

Its interesting he brings up satanism since most SJWs carry the torch of christian puritans. Its why SJWs are typically American and have so much angst towards Christianity, a desperate attempt to separate from it but truly are unable to separate from the guilt-culture.

I wonder how on-point he realizes he is.


0f46f6 No.151134

>>146756

A feminist, that works in the porn industry? Who knew?


1ffc87 No.151864

>>151134

also a jew


f36001 No.151929

>>150959

oh, this retard.

Sex-positivity stems from feminazi of yore being divided into camps of people who were pro-porn, pro-sexual education, pro-prostitution etc and those who were not.

Today, while people love to claim they're "sex-positive", will lash out against men for being dominant and sexually aggressive. Modern feminism is sex-negative. Men are evil, as usual. And women never choose to whore themselves, it's the patriarchy. And yet again, only the sexuality of the homosexual population should be respected. Women who are into BDSM have internalized their oppression.


c80fff No.151934

>>151929

Did you even read the article?

Jim takes jabs at all sides, although he thinks the supposed "sex positivists" are naïve morons.


8de839 No.156517

Strippers are garbage. Not special. Not unique. Just more cunts. You girls have all kinds of ideas about things, but you're just another dumb whore. Prove me wrong.

Bitch, I don't care if you're a "singer", or a "dance technician" or even a "writer" in your spare time. Why would I? You must understand. To me, you don't have a personality, aside from the wrinkled hog jowls between your legs. Now that's interesting!

Obviously!

Tell me why I would think otherwise. Why would an intelligent human being assume that a woman who exposes her genitals for greasy one-dollar bills has anything important to say? I mean, come on! That's one step up from a trained monkey! What, do you have some magic "inner goodness" about you? Yeah, right! You're a prostitute! That isn't good!

I've fucked strippers. I've hung out with strippers. Garbage. They use drugs as if the comet hits tomorrow. They get drunk and tell you about their lives. They're "artists", and "thrift store owners" and "worth something". Uh, excuse me, ma'am? Could you get your fucking life out of my way? I'm trying to look up your asshole. Thanks.

I can look at the place on your body that shit comes out of. Anytime I want. For a dollar. And you have feelings? I can see your pooper! Is this a joke?


8de839 No.156518

I've tried, believe me. I've tried to listen to you. But I just cant seem to get my head around the idea that you show your privates to people you dont know for money. Can't you wait tables or something? What's wrong with you? Are you broken? Now, you can't get enough of exhibitionism with the hardhats at work, you actually put on costumes and pretend to be "burlesque dancers" in your spare time. Really. That's not interesting, that's stupid. That's like me dressing up like a "ninja", or a "wizard". Cut it out. Show me your pussy. Shut up, here's a dollar.

You're a servant. Low class. For a dollar you'll let me look at your brown-eye. You'll come over to my house and do it for, what, $69.95?If I had some Ecstasy tablets you would suck my dick. Really, you would. You would just lick my nuts. If I bought you some platform boots, or a fur coat, I could fuck you up the ass. Really. For enough money, you'll do anything, because you are a prostitute. I bet you'd dance naked right in front of me, and rub your crotch on my lap, for about ten bucks. Yep, you sure would.

Obviously!

I don't care if you're happy taking your clothes of for money. Do whatever you want, it won't be important. I'll never care. It just frustrates me that you assume I respect you, because I don't. I wouldn't expect you to think highly of me if I, say, sucked cock at the train station for a living. Or if I got paid to dress up like a woman and lip-sync to ABBA songs. That's disgusting. I would be ashamed to expose myself to roomfuls of people.

I think its clear that the majority of women in our culture feel the same way. They feel very private about their genitals. They don't show them to just anybody. So, consequently, the woman who feels no shame, the woman who actually dances around naked is decidedly abnormal. Sort of a freak. I mean, come on. What sort of twisted, damaged person would show me their genitals for a dollar? What is that, a cry for help?

Obviously!

So, girls, follow your heart. If your brain is so royally fucked, that you aren't ashamed of being a prostitute, keep wiggling that ass. Hey, I don't mind, it's great for me. I like it, because it means you arent even really a person. You're an object. You're like a Sphincter-TV that I can turn on whenever the mood strikes me. I have a few drinks, and blow on your clit when your back's turned. Then I laugh.

It only costs me a dollar. Whore.


87f81d No.156639

>>156518

>You're like a Sphincter-TV that I can turn on whenever the mood strikes me.

HA! Now that's mean and hilarious at the same time.


3ffa8b No.156656

File: 1440772191319.png (150.92 KB, 304x408, 38:51, completely erect.png)

>>146882

Huh, I thought the patriarchy-bashing was reserved only to sex-repressed SJWs like Anita Sarkeesian.

On a side note, not surprised that one of Craster's wives I remembered getting fucked in GoT was a pornstar. I would have no problem oppressing her with my patriarchy either.


2d1c8d No.157284

File: 1440885571883-0.jpg (5.75 KB, 141x85, 141:85, aww yeahh.jpg)

File: 1440885571884-1.jpg (17.96 KB, 133x212, 133:212, belle knox.jpg)

File: 1440885571885-2.jpg (29.06 KB, 193x243, 193:243, self esteem.jpg)

File: 1440885571885-3.jpg (10.02 KB, 191x181, 191:181, linkin park crawling dot m….jpg)


268f60 No.157306

>>146756

don't get me wrong, i'm all about the lolz of seeing some ratfaced kike bitch get debased.

but she's so unattractive, this shit is unfappable.


2ced6b No.157309

>>157306

This. If I want drepaved shit I'd watch some cherry torn stuff. Nothing more hot a bitch who is to even kinkier stuff tan you are.


cb36d0 No.157311

>>157306

A wild wizard appears.


edc054 No.157581

Someone post more porn to counterbalance the tl;dr /pol/ faggotry


87f81d No.157642

>>157581

>hurrrrr /pol/ durrrrrrrrr

If you can't handle the banter, then get the fuck out.


bf3264 No.157651

>>146882

Ryan Faulk/Fringe Elements has a good theory. That feminists are just women that really don't like beta males, hence why they like being degraded by alphas and chads.


edc054 No.157929

>>157642

I can handle it fine, it's just fucking annoying to scroll past all the tl;dr


2d1c8d No.189520

File: 1450930952942.jpg (Spoiler Image, 124.05 KB, 1152x768, 3:2, teamfortress15.jpg)


b0bef1 No.189620

>>189520

>4months late to the thread


aed1f3 No.189687

File: 1451001580632.png (262.68 KB, 546x700, 39:50, 144099343.png)

>>151048

>muh rope day soon

Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound when you repeat the same empty threat over and over and over


e6148c No.189714

>>147670

This is one of the funniest videos I've ever seen. I want more.. I want to edit these things for a hobby but I can't stand these type of porn movies.


7d49aa No.192728

>>189714

If you really need to see more, go to Efukt.com. Plenty of that hilarity to be had.


85c80b No.192753

Does she have a Twitter or something?


85c80b No.192757

>>192753

I just realized that this thread is four months old, so I'm answering my own question.

http://www.xojane.com/author/belle-knox (inactive)

https://www.facebook.com/missbelleknox (deleted)

https://twitter.com/belle_knox (one spam tweet)

missbelleknox@gmail.com (likely the same fate as the above)

Unless she has an active social media account, she probably can't be trolled, so I'm bumplocking the thread. If I'm wrong, report the proof and I'll un-bumplock it.

Post last edited at

f572d3 No.192766

>>150726

The magic hand at work.


e8773d No.192868

>>151048

We might take you more seriously if you threw in another internet meme.


5c37af No.193324

>>147306

>>146892

Shit, can you find a poltard who actually gets a black guy to fuck his gf?

Or fuck a black girl, whatevs

On the other hand you have feminazis getting dominated ON CAMERA


5c37af No.193326

>>147649

It sounds like rather than regretting it she regrets how it made her look

>>150778

Pretty sure the moralfagging is to keep the bitches down, this is maledom-humilliation porn you know?




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]