34710e No.151081
I'm still not sure if this is just bait or these people are legitimently mentally ill but i thought /cow/ would find this quite amusing.
https://lolcow.farm/b/
this thread inparticular is comedy gold https://lolcow.farm/b/res/21625.html
e27264 No.151119
Ah I know that place. They have a lolcow board, too, but it's mostly bitching about cosplay and makeup gurus. And threads get mostly derailed with personal sob stories (eating disorders are especially triggering).
Fucking /cgl/ trainwrecks
e8cd1f No.151156
I remember /pt/ from the great tumblr doxing spree. They were quite based there, but looking at the thread in OP, there is quite a lot of milk there. Not quite as bad as wizardchan, perhaps, but I wouldn't be suprised if there's enough for a thread. All attached pics are from the thread linked to by OP.
e8cd1f No.151158
>>151156
I didn't underline everything funny. My comments/highlighting was rather spontaneous.
7f2a5a No.151161
I would argue there was the occasional poster pointing out how how the thread was cancer, which it is
But the over all feeling was like a echo chamber for sandy vaginas
>"I HATE men and I am repulsed by them! But #notallmen"
Someone posted the thread link on /r9k/ and the thread basically balanced out and it no longer feels like an echo chamber
238e14 No.151169
I don't have a beef with lolcow.farm. As far as women go, they're actually pretty reasonable.
If you want to derail a thread, just start talking about thigh gaps. Insist that not having one means you're fat or that having one means you're anorexic.
2b07ab No.152199
Seems like the lolcow farm is home to aggressive catladies, too
The OP wasn't about cats btw
7a7a3a No.152321
>>151119
/cgl/ is basically tumblr with fat or scrawny bitches living in fantasy. Anything but blind praise triggers.
>>151121
>boyfriend
Must be beta as fuck
>>151156
>you asshole
This what I noticed about /cgl/ only board where you get people being this mad. Women should stay of the chan boards.
>>151169
Imply they aren't perfect and they'll probably start puking.
>>152199
It's mostly landwhales with some gross skeletons thrown in.
238e14 No.152346
/r9k/ looking for love in the lolcow.farm containment thread.
One of them has been particularly desperate and has posted his picture no less than three times.
Since I'm pretty sure a /r9k/ user started this thread here, I have to ask: what are you guys thinking? You realize that is basically /cgl/, right? As in cosplayers? They would chew you up and spit you out even if you managed to wrangle e-relationships out of that thread.
3bb262 No.152766
Don't be silly. Girls can't be wizards!
d6c433 No.152778
>>152199
Well she's not wrong
da8fea No.152799
>cat thread on the front page
>:3c
not surprised in the least. did OP find a board of ozmas or something?
4bc98f No.152824
>>152799
HAH
I'm surprised there isn't a thread about that fucking cunt, yet. Then again, her doxxing on SomethingSensitive was pretty much the end all be all of doxxing.
>Getting a degree in Poetry
da8fea No.152825
>>152824
You got a link of that doxxing? I need a pick-me-up because college is hosing me again.
335951 No.152826
89c23b No.152832
>>152826
She can't have ever spoken to or had a boyfriend or friends. Do you guys even know the rules of Wizards?
f25769 No.154329
>>152346
They're still at it. A few times it looked like a robot hit it off with one of the chicks there. Then a couple of days later some shining testimonials were posted. /r9k/ confirmed for studs?
>>152825
A little late, but
http://somethingsensitive.com/index.php?topic=5938.0
6ee287 No.154356
1323b8 No.154365
lolcow.farm now 302 redirects to reddit.com/r/8chan if you access it form 8chan. copypaste the URL into your browser to access it.
pitiful. this is wizardchan tier. that's the only other website i've ever seen try to divert traffic deceptively like this.
12e616 No.154370
>>154365
Maybe it's a joke.
1323b8 No.154372
>>154370
"Some /r9k/ and 8chan users are currently raiding the site. There may be some spam. Sorry for the inconvenience."
72044e No.154375
>>152778
She is wrong. People who live to be a century don't live miserable lives. You really think someone is able to stay healthy enough to out live the average human while living in misery?
b64b54 No.154376
>>154375
I've seen some miserable old folks. Including holocaust survivors. Genetic lottery.
72044e No.154378
f037a4 No.154384
>>154376
I think it entirely depends on the old person. You have the miserable old person, but you also have the old people who still enjoy themselves. My Grandmother (mid 80's) has been traveling the world in the decades since she retired. She's done shit I would never think of doing. Hell, she went to Antarctica once and had to be rescued when the ship she was on got flooded in a storm.
12e616 No.154386
>>154384
She sounds manic.
f25769 No.154393
>>154365
>>154370
>>154372
This thing with r9k is really funny to me for some reason.
First someone called lolcow the female wizardchan so r9k hopped over to collect their NEET waifus.
Now robots are reading lolcow and getting pissed at the female supremacist shit or whenever one of them mentions that she has a boyfriend. Lolcow is pissed that the sanctity of their estrogen den has been defiled. The robots on safari are going to be pissed when they finally realize they aren't getting any sex out of this.
12e616 No.154401
>>154393
I think that there are probably a few wizardchan users there as well. Let's ask them. Make a big thread there about it.
f25769 No.156538
>>156526
I don't see what's funny about man-hating by itself. It's disappointing is all.
What's funny, again, is the robot thread. This was some good shit.
I did get retroactively permabanned for making a post in /snow/ the day before a rule was made that 8chan and r9k are not allowed anywhere except /b/, so the outsiders are definitely pissing them off.
I guess we'll see how silly they get.
ceedee No.156540
>>156538
Our admin has a stick up her ass about this. So long as you follow the rules, I see no reason why you shouldn't be allowed to post shit, but she is an asshole from my few interactions with her.
>>154393
I frequent both lolcow and /r9k/ and they are incredibly similar when you get right down to it.
c04a85 No.156541
>>156538
How knew are you? Just wondering.
c04a85 No.156542
>>156540
>but she is an asshole from my few interactions with her
Go on…..
Do you mean in the chat room? Is that really her?
ceedee No.156543
>>156542
Not in the chat room. I've not personally interacted with her, but from seeing her around, my impression is that she can't take a joke and wants lolcow to be a very specific way for her own entertainment rather than the general user base.
e86e0d No.156544
>>156543
admin seems pretty great to me. lolcow is meant to be female centric so i get the cordoning off of robots… they have a thread to themselves to shit up and basically nothing else is censored there that i can tell. it's refreshing to have a female community that isn't run by sjw fascists (for now at least)
c04a85 No.156548
>>156543
I kind of get that impression too tbh. Farmhand is way more annoying though.
>>156544
I sometimes get shit for being rude or something when it's not warranted. You go to /r9k/ and there aren't many rules, while on lolcow there are a lot. I still like that we have this admin, most are shit.
ceedee No.156549
>>156544
Well I haven't spoken to her.
I should mention that I am extremely cynical and hate pretty much everyone, so she probably is cool and I'm just a bitch.
186603 No.156550
ceedee No.156551
>>156548
FARMHAND
Farmhand is the one that pisses me off, not admin. I wasn't aware there was a difference. Excuse me.
e86e0d No.156553
>>156548
>I sometimes get shit for being rude or something when it's not warranted.
well that's kind of retarded. granted, there is a high rate of bpd crazyass bitches on lolcow who get really vindictive and gnarly out of turn, but the nature of the main board of the site is kind of cunty to begin with, so i'm surprised any staff would try to tamp down on bitchiness.
though i wish some of the mentally ill people there would self monitor their unpleasantness. it really drags down the quality of conversation and for what purpose.
186603 No.156554
>>151119
>They have a lolcow board, too, but it's mostly bitching about cosplay and makeup gurus.
pfff, our cows are a lot more interesting than yours.
c04a85 No.156555
>>156551
Ya, I think that farmhand is butthurt and that whoever moves the threads is very fast to do so.
ded54c No.156572
>>151081
That looks like bizzaro /r9k/. Wizardchan is far, far more extreme. At least that's the impression I'm getting from skimming the screen caps.
Reading through these more thoroughly it does seem pretty tumblr. I'm not surprised given that it's a /cgl/ community off-shoot though.
So it's bizarro /r9k/ + tumblr.
>>152199
I mean, this part sounds like /r9k/.
>>151156
Even some of the first part of this, minus the tumblr bit. Still not wizardchan territory though.
>>156526
This is classic /r9k/ if you switched around the genders. They're right at about some points though. Women in our generation are pretty fucked up, and so are the men. I don't we've had such shitty gender relations in the West ever.
Mind you, I'm not whiteknighting, and you don't need me to tell you that you're free to laugh at them. I just think it's too far to say they're wizardchan since those fuckers are robots who went over the deep end.
e7f1c4 No.156579
>>152346
Desperate times, desperate measures.
7a7a3a No.156585
>>156538
>retroactively banned
Yeah your fucked.
f25769 No.156683
>>156572
I never said there weren't loonies on that board. I remember when Ashley, one of the anorexics they follow, lamented that she doesn't feel like a real woman because her anorexia fucked up her ovaries. Of few of them got all 'HEAR ME ROAR'.
But even before the raid I saw enough dissenting opinions to figure it wasn't as bad as r9k or tumblr.
Unless those voices of reason were actually men undercover.
>>156585
I'll be interested to see how hard they crack down in the near future. If they decide they want all the males gone and start banning people who might have Y chromosomes for saying something male-friendly, then you will have your catlady echochamber.
32d795 No.156699
>>156683
Also: Wtf is up with their obsession with anorexics? You can bring up just about any girl on the internet with an eating disorder and they try to make her into a lolcow.
10cfb3 No.156703
Admin is a male
>I have been ambiguous about my gender up until now, but to prevent confusion, I'd just like to inform everyone that I'm male. (Every other staff member is female.)
>I prefer to preserve my anonymity as much as possible, but it feels wrong when someone assumes I'm female and to not deny it, so I think it is best to let everyone know.
Well that's weird tbh that a male is trying to run a girl chan and working so hard to control conversation. Ok then.
c04a85 No.156828
>>156699
Eh, we haven't had good drama in a while. A bunch of cunts from PULL hopped on over and started making shitty drama-less threads about e-stars, so the admin got more picky over what is and isn't allowed in /pt/. All the thread in /b/ suck because they get spammed by 8chan fags so there isn't much else to do other than watch anorexics die.
b500f6 No.156999
lolcow is okay, a little liberal but the user base is predominately women so whatever. but man, they are savage when it comes to lolcows. "hell hath no fury like a woman's scorn" really applies there.
cfe0e0 No.157252
>>151081
>link redirects to reddit.com/r/8chan
c04a85 No.157675
>>157252
They should make it redirect to 8chan /g/.
e3e8e7 No.157692
>>157252
>not sanitizing your referrers
b2a9de No.157694
Regular lolcow user here,I just wanna defend the board by saying that we've had an influx of sjw types from tumblr lately and that misandry thread is mostly considered cancer by the older farmers who know better.
I hope you don't think we're all bitchy man haters, but I'm certainly not and I tried to point out the stupidity several times in that thread but the feefees were too much. It's fine to vent about dudes, lord knows, I do it, but that misandry thread is literally toxic.
So yeah…idk, we're not all like that. I'd say the vast majourity are all anti-sjw and pretty cool.
e3e8e7 No.157699
>>157694
>farmers
At last, I truly see what anons were talking about.
7c8146 No.157716
>>157699
I fucking warned you
0e8458 No.157849
>>157694
>go to lolcow.farm
>topic I visit moved to /g/
I hope I don't get banned for having a penis
b2a9de No.157854
>>157849
Should be okay. As long as you're talking about girl shit.
f25769 No.157855
>>157694
Maybe your admin should make a board for obese, hairy-lipped headcases with premature ovarian failure. Then ban anyone who gets triggered and doesn't go there to rant.
c04a85 No.157872
>>157694
>misandry thread is mostly considered cancer by the older farmers who know better.
Ya no. Fuck you. I've been there from day one. There is nothing wrong with man hating you fucking faggot. It sounds to me like you're that male user who always makes posts mentioning that your a guy who browses /pt/, gtfo faggot.
f0ce61 No.157875
>>157694
It's okay you're a really cool girl and you're one of the guys and we like you and you're popular and you're not like the others you swear
57a5f8 No.157879
>>157694
Why are you sucking up to these spergs who gives a fuck about what they think of our board
9960bf No.157890
/cgl/ is full of the type of women that make /r9k/ and wizardchan's misogyny seem warranted if you're the type of saddo who spends all day online.
f25769 No.157893
thats right, we sassy af and dont need no man
what we do need is more patchouli oil
0e8458 No.157904
>>157854
It was just style thread. It didn't mention male or female only soooo.
Also, in a thread about health/fitness I replied to one girl about her being anemic and how girls need to pay special attention to and not starve yourself like a retard it I got bombarded with "wow way to constantly point out you're a guy" "what a special snowflake" and all. I'm sure it was just butthurt users, and I like a lot of thee conversation, but the put downs just for mentioning your gender in a relevant fashion is kind of ridiculous.
c04a85 No.157905
>>157890
>wheh wheh gf not letting me watch porn is aboosive wheh
8dd708 No.157912
>>157905
Porn is degenerate, but so is being so beta you let your woman control you.
But clearly, the screencap you're responding to is filled with insane harpies and abusive women who get away with it because they're women.
71e16b No.157913
>>157905
The reactions to it are rather insane. Greentexting isn't much of a rebuttal.
477fd4 No.157919
>the female wizardchan
But they aren't witches
c04a85 No.157935
>>157912
How is any of that abusive at all? Breaking up with a man because he would rather watch porn than have sex with you seems pretty normal. I broke up with my ex for that reason.
>Letting your woman control you
Fucking lol. All I'm gathering from this is that you want to do whatever you want without your girlfriend being allowed to have an opinion on it. Your gf wanting you to stop doing something for the sake of your sex life isn't fucking "abusive" and you clearly have no grasp of what real abuse is. Breaking up with someone isn't abusive, make dealings you fucking baby.
0e8458 No.157936
>>157905
It's porn. You don't jerk off to porn for any emotional reason, it's all physical.
Porn is just fantasy as well, I wouldn't get on a girl for reading erotic literature.
c04a85 No.157938
>>157936
Why do men think that women physically masturbate to romance novels? That's almost adorable.
>It's all physical
Then why be in a sexual relationship at all? Why not just be friends? Sleeping with hookers is justified by that logic.
0e8458 No.157940
>>157938
Men and women are much different. A man's sexual drive, generally, is much more nagging and it feels like a necessity. I know that If I go more than a few days without jerking off it gets really REALLY annoying. Porn is just a simple form of stimuli to make the masturbation process go smoother. I doubt many women, or even men, would want to fuck every day just to sate their partner unless they're a sex addict.
And oh please, people Both masturbate and have sex in a relationship. You're ridiculous.
e3e8e7 No.157941
>>157904
Psychological abuse entails, among other things; hypercriticism, domination, control, and withdrawal of affection.
The cap of that thread clearly has posts displaying some psychological abusers, as well as retards rattling off "muh social science study" about objectification of women.
610726 No.157943
37d3af No.157944
>>157890
>Formatting his hard drive
I'd stab a bitch
8dd708 No.157948
>>157935
>giving an ultimatum to either break up or keep what you have on YOUR computer isn't abusive
>controlling people through sex isn't abusive
>forcibly formatting another person's hard drive isn't abusive
>falsely reporting CP on another person's computer because they use encryption isn't abusive
Get the fuck out back to tumblr you fucking harpy.
>11 posts in the thread
>all defending the subject of the thread
That's some dedicated shitposting.
e3e8e7 No.157951
>>157941
meant to reply to
>>157935
For example, "if you don't stop watching pornography, I will break up with you" are, in fact, psychological abuse. If you have ever said that, you are an abuser.
Trying to pass off that shit as non-abusive, or non-manipulative on /cow/ is hilarious.
Just what exactly do you think we do here?
0e8458 No.157954
>>157944
If a girl did that to me, I'd probably sue for lost possible profits due to ideas/publishable writing/ blueprints id have made myself being deleted.
Plus I have like every fucking STALKER mod I like saved on there.
610726 No.157957
I was JUST BANNED PERMANENTLY from lolcow for posting a picture of doomguy. I didnt insult anyone. I didnt type out anything.
Jesus the mods are faggots.
610726 No.157959
Call me Doug Dimmrad the Delightened. I'm a self aware Ultra Conservative White Man. But I my consciousness has expanded far into the high unreachable truths that humanity cannot reach. And I will give you one tip. When walking down the street, spontaneously look back. Someone might be getting a creepshot of dat ass.
c04a85 No.157962
>>157941
>>157951
>"if you don't stop watching pornography, I will break up with you" are, in fact, psychological abuse. If you have ever said that, you are an abuser.
So, you always have to stay in a relationship with someone no matter what they do and breaking up with them for any reason is abusive? Fucking hell. Accusing someone of being an abuser for wanting to leave you is abuse as well by that definition.
>>157940
Why not ask for a bj? I like it when my bf wants sex and I'll always try to satisfy him, even if I'm not in the mood. And having sex everyday isn't a lot, the fact that you think it is just shows how ruined you are because of porn.
>>157948
If he's okay with it, then who gives a fuck?
>>157957
And nothing of value was lost
74490f No.157964
>>157940
>>157938
Can confirm
>Don't choke my chicken for a few days
>Try to sleep
>Boner
>Boner goes away
>KNOW WHAT WOULD BE GOOD RIGHT NOW, JERKING OFF
>Another boner
>Can't get comfortable
>Erections at odd times
610726 No.157965
>>157962
Who are you and y u so emotionally invested on the internet?
37d3af No.157966
>>157954
Not to mention lost tax info and old photos of family and friends
c04a85 No.157969
>>157964
Then you can't do it without porn?
e13a8a No.157972
>>157969
What if some anon wants to jerk off to traps/gay porn?
Are they harassing women then?
e3e8e7 No.157973
>>157962
>no matter what they do
No, but you should actually communicate before putting down an ultimatum that's ultimately about dominating and controlling them so thoroughly that they become insecure about their eye movements in public. That's abuse. Deal with it. I'm pretty much just reiterating textbook examples.
"I love you, but…"
"If you don't, I will…"
You're not helping your partner, you're abusing them.
c04a85 No.157974
>>157972
Well, then they're fucking gay and that's a good reason to breakup.
477fd4 No.157975
>>157962
>no matter what they do
He was just jacking off, maybe the relationship you had meant a lot to him. Fantasy is BY NOW WAY the same as reality. You may fantasize killing the neighbors dog, but you won't really do it, because in reality you know It's wrong. Like, what the fuck, leaving someone for watching porn. lmao, its not like you can't watch porn and masturbate either
477fd4 No.157976
477fd4 No.157977
>>157975
not leaving, but threatening*
drunk as fuck
610726 No.157978
>>157973
Bruh. If a person is person is doing those power ultimatums, its very likely that they're narcissists. In which case, they're incapable of love. Narcissists only value someone for narcissistic supply, if they cant get that you're worthless to them.
c04a85 No.157984
>>157973
You're pulling assumptions out of your ass here. Obviously these people "communicate" before hand. If that communication doesn't work out, then why am I obligated to stay with him?
>>157975
What does fantasy have to do with anything? Fantasy is not a physical thing, it comes from within you. Porn is physical and it's been linked to sex difficulties and relationship trouble in various studies. If my boyfriend can only get off to other women, so be it. Why not just be friends?
0e8458 No.157987
>>157984
He can get off to a lot of things. he can get off to imagination. he can get off to 2D girls. He can get off to porn. He can get off to you. Just let a man fucking masturbate in peace before he goes crazy from being both sex and masturbation starved.
>>157969
Porn makes it a loooot easier.
e13a8a No.157991
>>157984
How is porn physical? are you referring to Porn mags? Porn DVDs? drawn images of tits?
Speaking of fantasy, what if the porn is monstergirl? Is that grounds for a breakup?
610726 No.157992
>>157987
Why are you giving this retard anymore attention? Do you really think she is interested in anything that isnt her narrative?
>Blah blah blah, why can't I just be friends?
Do what ever you want.
>Why am I obligated to stay with him?
Do what ever you want.
We're people on the on an online christian fun posting website. Not wise sages or genius philosophers.
c04a85 No.157994
>>157987
>sex starved
Here is what I don't get. Why doesn't he just have sex with me? If I requested him to have sex instead of watching porn, then why does he still need porn? All that tells me is that he prefers porn to me.
477fd4 No.157995
>>157984
>only
I doubt hes your boyfriend if he can only get off to other women..
Maybe he wants a romantic relationship, where you kiss, cuddle and all that shit. I'm mentioning fantasy because that's what hes doing, thinking of an arousing nonexistent scenario which he wouldn't commit in reality. Fantasies with people he doesn't know are fine, you don't have to be completely devoted in your head, romantic relationships are all about mutual trust and understanding while sharing more close experiences, you can play around in your head, and with jacking off to fantasies hes not breaking anything.
Like, would you really break up with your boyfriend because of that?
1f8e1f No.157997
>>157984
What a crock of bullshit.
Do you have any idea of what you're talking about? Like, really, do you?
I mean
>Porn is physical
Really? Just how much of a self centered "daddy never loved me" harpy are you?
Did we hurt your whore feelings by calling you out?
Porn is not physical because it's literally fucking images on a screen, presumably.
And even if it isn't on a screen, it's still just images.
You're stupid ass is treating a god damned NECESSITY for life as a male, sexual release, as owning a god damned real doll.
If it was a sex doll then maybe, MAYBE, your skank ass would be justified, and yes I say "your" because you're clearly from there.
But it's not. It's porn.
It's fantasy.
What about the impossible shit huh?
What if he's really depraved in his FANTASIES and faps to shit like shitting dick nipples?
Let me guess
>that's even worse because she can NEVER achieve that, and as such justifies any acts of jealousy
Gimme a break.
477fd4 No.157999
>>157994
maybe he's not willing to take the responsibility of getting you off, because if you get him off then he'll feel bad for not doing it for you, so he just wants to relieve himself
8dd708 No.158000
>>157984
>supports creating abusive ultimatums as a power play
>makes it all about ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME as soon as anyone has an opposing thought on the matter
Great narcissism bruh.
Gee, I wonder what an given man's problem would be if you were what he had to deal with…
69e4af No.158002
File: 1440991979704.jpg (78.38 KB, 639x633, 213:211, 11742806_866902780031580_7….jpg)

What on earth is that place? An imageboard focused on lolcows but for women only (where they spout tumblr views but also allow racism and doxxing)?
This is one hell of an Eldritch Abomination. This is why I love /cow/, I love finding this kinda wacky shit
610726 No.158003
>>157999
load of barnacles. Men fall head over heels over pretty girls that want sex. If he isnt fucking her and sticking to her, it's because she's an unlikable egoist cunt. He's probably sticking with her because he doesn't want to be alone.
f0ce61 No.158004
>>157935
Hey hot shit throw me a fucking bone here and listen
The function of a relationship is to have children, I know you like that warm feeling all up in your cunt, but it's physically related to the essence of the creation of a human being. How about you do yourself a favor and view sex as a procreative energy only to be done between those of a connection worth creating a human being over. Consider how your parents' relationship fucked you up and then progress from there when selecting a sexual partner, it's progressive that way.
Maybe then you'll participate in a relationship that means more than the mutual pleasure between the guy and gal. You want to tell a story about that any woman who wants to get fucked but can't must be in a state of abuse, fine by me, but you'd be doing yourself a favor to notice that true sexual pleasure occurs in the mutual understanding of what makes a person, and if you're going to make a person revolving around sex then I hope you're prepared to squirt out a kid who doesn't relate with you at all until old enough to want to fuck.
You can be a slut if you want, plenty of guys are unloving assholes, I'm sure you know. But if you really want to sit around pretending there is no greater love between man and woman than mutual masturbation through sex, you might be fucked. Enjoy your rage and suffering. No really, it helps us guys determine who's worth loving.
ac4821 No.158005
Any woman who would leave a man due to jealousy over porn has some very deep seated issues. You should see a shrink.
e3e8e7 No.158008
>>157984
>these people communicate beforehand
Did you view the same picture that I did?
Throughout the thread, it's all about dominating and controlling.
But, again, as another anon said, do whatever you want. Don't pretend that your trying to control what your partner watches, or threatening them so they become self-concious about their eye movements, or destroying something of theirs, or guilt tripping them, and most of all trying to make them believe that it's their fault that you're treating them this way, because your feel feels are right, it's all abuse.
Man, this is a tangent, now about your board…
1730db No.158009
File: 1440992716720.jpg (56.51 KB, 544x517, 544:517, c419a40d9ee1ebf0b0959defbb….jpg)

74490f No.158015
>>158009
Oh man what an epic reddit meme.
ac4821 No.158017
Romance novels have been linked to relationship problems as well. When an adult woman starts comparing you to a sparkling blood drinking fairy then you have a problem. Talk about unrealistic expectations.
c04a85 No.158018
>>158000
>>158003
Hey now, I'm a very passive person. I don't speak up often and I don't ask for much in a relationship. I don't get upset easily and I'm very reasonable. If he refused to comply with my one, simple request, then fuck him. I don't ask for a lot, but I expect a significant other to respect what I have to say when I do.
>>158004
Sex and relationships should be for the sole purpose of reproduction, you sound like a great boyfriend. When did I say that my relationships revolve around sex? Again, the same argument could be made about cheating. "it's just sex, why do you care?" ect. Sex and love are not mutual exclusive things, there is a lot of emotions connected to it. All you've been doing is claiming that I'm not worth loving because I have a simple request relating to sex.
>>158008
Yes, and you can't control who I sleep with during our relationshit or it's abuse. It's all about domination. Threatening to leave me, guilt tripping me, or making me believe it's my fault is abusive and controlling, it's muh body.
1730db No.158019
c04a85 No.158020
>>158017
Then ask her to stop reading them and see what she says.
ac4821 No.158023
>>158020
Believe me, I have. Dumping someone over it is stupid though. It's abusive. Telling someone you are going to break up with them over what turns them on when you aren't around. That's just wrong.
You are a bad person.
e3e8e7 No.158025
>>158009
>and you can't control who I sleep with during our relationshit or it's abuse.
Cheating is also psychological abuse, dipshit.
Not sure if you're damage controlling or just want the attention. Not much of a difference regardless.
1730db No.158026
>>157994
Your insecurity is not anyone else's problem.
You just want to to be sex gateway for power and personal validation.
The fact is, jackin it is better than dealing with your shit tier bullshit.
jackin it is better than dealing with your shit tier bullshit.
Time to wake up when you aren't even worth it as a cum receptacle.
ac4821 No.158027
>>158025
Its only cheating if you agreed to be monogamous. Otherwise you're just imposing your world view on them.
1f8e1f No.158028
>>158018
Don't you try to dodge what I said slut.
And stop lying.
8dd708 No.158031
>>158018
>very reasonable
>will create ultimatums about the cocks on someone else's computer
>very reasonable
>supporting people who format HDDs to remove porn or false report CP if the HDD is encrypted
>very reasonable
Tumblrina, your definition of "reasonable" is stretched so far you could almost use it as a belt.
ac4821 No.158032
>>157994
Stop masturbating to other men in bed. Sure it's just in your mind. You tell yourself it's different because "he's not real". You forget that the girl in the porn is just an actress. It's light and shadow. Nothing more.
e3e8e7 No.158037
>>158027
I agree with that. But the comparison was with things their partner views, thinks, and such. Better to say if it's an implied monogamous relationship from the beginning and then "totally not an abuser" starts threatening to cheat if she can't control what you view, think, or where your eyes move, then it's abuse. I suppose.
Oh well, done giving attention.
c04a85 No.158052
>>158023
It seems like you people make up your own definition of abuse, so I wont try to refute weather or not it's abuse. I have no issue with him being aroused by certain things or having sexual fantasies, I just don't want him watching porn. Why do men consider porn to be such a huge part of their lives, to the point where a woman asking you to give it up is abusive? Why do you care more about porn than love and sex?
>>158028
How am I dodging anything you said and how am I a slut?
>>158026
>power
How am I trying to assert power over anyone? Isn't he asserting power over me by not taking my emotions into consideration? Isn't he emotional abusing me by making me into a cuck and jerking off to girls that he apparently prefers over me and expecting me to be okay with it?
>>158025
By that logic, porn is psychological abuse as well.
>>158037
>Threatening to cheat
The fuck? I wouldn't cheat period, I'm saying that your argument is shit if your only defense is "it's just sex, who cares?"
1730db No.158054
>>158052
>isn't he emotional abusing me by making me into a cuck and jerking
Nope. Unless he's deliberately shoving it in your face and going HA THESE ARE SOO MUCH BETTER THAN YOU HAR HAR HAR
What you are doing persecuting for thought crime because in the end porn is merely fantasy, high definition does not change this.
The image on screen cannot hurt you.
74490f No.158055
>>158052
Think of Jerking off like eating. Sure, I'll eat lettuce, but that doesn't mean that I like it more than something like pulled pork.
f0ce61 No.158059
>>158052
Look, you make some good points, but if you're going to ask your boyfriend not to look at porn, you need to also accept if he doesn't want always to have sex. The willingness always to have sex is absolutely and directly the same desire to look at porn. If you want a boyfriend who's always ready and who won't say no to getting off, then you should be prepared for that boyfriend to be infatuated with porn. I don't know what your boyfriend was or wasn't giving you, and you have the authority to break up with whomever you want, but its supportive to the monogamy you want to allow a person you love to choose not to have sex with you.
There are of course balances.
c04a85 No.158060
>>158054
>thought crime
How the fuck am I forbidding him from thinking what he wants? I'm forbidding him from watching other women get fucked in the ass. If he knows how much it hurts me, and he does it anyways, then that's abuse (by your stupid definition). It means that he prefers other women, so fuck him. He doesn't want me in the first place, so I don't want to keep the relationshit up.
>>158055
So, sex would be the lettuce and porn the pulled pork?
c04a85 No.158062
>>158059
When did I say that I expected him to have sex whenever I wanted to? I want him to have sex instead of porn.
74490f No.158063
>>158060
Now you're being intentionally obtuse.
b599eb No.158064
>>158058
You have shit for evidence. Telling us to Google it. You can't even defend your own arguements.
f0ce61 No.158065
>>158062
When did I say that's what you said?
1730db No.158066
>>158060
>How the fuck am I forbidding him from thinking what he wants? I'm forbidding him from watching other women get fucked in the ass
His thought is he likes to fantasize and see women get fucked in the ass.
If he wanted to do it he would go out and do it.
You have a poor conception of fantasy vs reality and are projecting your insecurities. If you are so easily hurt by thought then you are the problem and he is better off without you.
c04a85 No.158067
c04a85 No.158070
>>158067
Stupid filter.
http://benthamopen.com/ c-o-n-t-e-n-t-s /pdf/TOPSYJ/TOPSYJ-5-1.pdf
(remove the dashes)
c04a85 No.158074
>>158068
Pen and Teller is fucking stupid. Both of them are Hollywood kikes, so of course they're going to defend it. Jews rule the porn industry and they care more about money than life. They even had an episode proclaiming that obesity was totes healthy, despite the fact that higher BMI is directly related to an increased chance of death. Why? So they can thrive on the masses buying their shit food, of course.
b599eb No.158076
>>158074
What the fuck? Tell us more about yourself and your relationship.
1f8e1f No.158077
>>158052
Bitch, do I need to explain UID'S to you too?
Figures your free bleeding heart would need that spelled out as well.
Well whatever, I'm done talking to this brick wall. Your bitching requires too much out of me and the thing I'm typing on right now is a right pain in my rear to type on.
You've been schooled numerous times in this thread already you're battered enough for the oven.
>>158058
No way lame-o
b599eb No.158079
>>158074
Implying Penn is Jewish.
8dd708 No.158081
>>158060
>forbidding someone from doing something
>anything but abuse
>guys why are you so opposed to me imposing my views on an unwilling "lover"?
e3e8e7 No.158083
>>158044
Only for you cutie.
>>158052
>It seems like you people make up your own definition of abuse
It's pretty much textbook example of abuse. It could fall under guilt tripping, controlling, and threatening. I thought this is someone you cared about, but I guess I was mistaken. Totally not abuse.
>Isn't he asserting power over me by not taking my emotions into consideration?
Talking about the /cgl/ thread cap, your feel feels about where your partner might lay their eyes, being hypercritical, destroying property, lying about them, unreasonable jealousy, etc. all abuse.
>porn is psychological abuse as well
>Porn is cheating.
muh sides
Maybe this is a fundamental misunderstanding, though I haven't really had a relationship with a woman that doesn't understand this.
Pornography is just a masturbatory aid. That's all it is. It's not comparable to cheating. You're fundamentally dishonest.
>if your only defense is "it's just sex, who cares?"
It's a masturbatory aid. It doesn't really mean anything, and it shouldn't be hurting your feels, other than the usual indicator of how fucked up our tastes in masturbatory aids have become after a decade or longer of exposure to the world wide web.
You're unreasonably jealous. If it's another woman on the screen you're jealous of, most usually don't fucking care who that woman is, nor would most people want to be in relationship with some person who gets fucked in the ass for hours upon hours multiple days a week.
How does your warped logic apply if it's 2d, by the way? Cheating with a drawing sounds interesting.
5649b5 No.158085
>>158074
Did you just ad hominem Penn and Teller with antisemitism?
So this is what feminist do when losing arguements on anonymous imageboards.
1f8e1f No.158087
>>158074
oh my god you really do have absolutely no fucking idea what the words you're stringing together even mean.
Riddle me this then, do you think you're hot enough to warrant getting fucked?
Because I could name multiple pornstars that are better people than you.
1730db No.158088
>>158083
>Cheating with a drawing sounds interesting.
Time to paste you waifu's to trigger the tumblerina.
5649b5 No.158090
Damn it. This isn't wizardchan. We don't have waifus.
1730db No.158091
5649b5 No.158092
Spouting anti semetic memes, arguing with the internet about her relationship for this long. I'm thinking she's a he or a female wizard. Either way I say we burn her.
f2971a No.158094
>>158092
I haven't read the thread but from your brief description the entire thing seems like it's probably a ruse.
c04a85 No.158099
>>158085
But I provided actual evidence while you provided a biased show.
>>158070
1f8e1f No.158104
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>158099
Wrong, that's opinion bitch.
You're arguing with science.
e3e8e7 No.158110
>>158099
The only thing that study says is that in some cases exposure to violent pornography may increase violent behavior towards females versus non-agressive pornography or neutral stimuli.
c04a85 No.158111
>>157997
>Porn is a necessity to life
Funny how men lasted without high speed internet porn for so long.
>sexual release
I'm fucking offering him sexual release but he preferred other women and expected me to be okay with it.
>Durrr daddy problems durrrr slut
Lol
>sex doll
It's on the same level as porn. I don't get why one is more acceptable than the other, really.
Porn is not a fantasy, it's something that's recorded by old jewish men who exploits girls from bad backgrounds.
>really depraved in his FANTASIES
Oh, but I thought porn WAS the fantasy. Then he's a sick fuck and I would also break up with him.
I bet you jerk off to shitting dick nipples and are butthurt that no woman will tolerate it.
All you're doing is whining and bitching about a woman not accepting something that you revolve your life around.
>>158104
>Wrong, that's opinion bitch. You're arguing with science.
Are you fucking stupid or did you intentionally not read my link?
88.2% of top rated porn scenes contain aggressive acts.
Studies show that after viewing pornography men are more likely to:
>>report decreased empathy for rape victims
>>have increasingly aggressive behavioral tendencies
>>report believing that a woman who dresses provocatively deserves to be raped
>>report anger at women who flirt but then refuse to have sex
>>report decreased sexual interest in their girlfriends or wives
>>report increased interest in coercing partners into unwanted sex acts
You're the one who's fucking ignoring science. A porn video that does not explicitly set up a rape scene can still encourage sexual violence by depicting violent acts.
1730db No.158112
>>158111
>I'm fucking offering him sexual release but he preferred other women and expected me to be okay with it.
Was that what was explicitly said or are you just projecting?
e3e8e7 No.158113
>>158110
Sorry, "agressive behavior"
>With respect to exposure effects, the results did not reveal that repeated exposure to violent or nonviolent pornography had any significant effe ct on laboratory aggression against women. These findings appear to be inconsistent with previous data showing that exposure to violent pornography may increase males' laboratory aggression toward women (e.g., Donnerstein, 1980a,b; 1984; Donnerstein and Berkowitz, 1981; Malamuth, 1978).
>The most apparent explanation for this discrepancy is that earlier inve stigations examined immediate effects (i.e., in same session that exposures were presented) whereas the present experiment tested for relatively long-term effects. It may be that exposure to violent pornography might have an immediate impact on aggressive behavior against women but this effect may dissipate quickly over time.
http://www.apa.org/divisions/div46/articles/malamuth.pdf
5649b5 No.158114
>>158113
Lab agression towards woman? What does that even mean?
5649b5 No.158116
>>158099
Your only evidence that the particular episode in question is biased is your own hatred of Jews.
Irony.
1730db No.158117
>>158111
Don't think porn has anything to do with it.
fdf8f4 No.158119
I got banned from there a few days ago. I don't know if it was initially assumed I was part of the invasion, but the official reason was changed to me "shitting up the board" by posting images of feminists saying/doing crazy shit in the MRA thread.
I don't know if it's general site policy, but my ban wasn't listed in the thread either, which was only irksome because people kept replying to posts I made with questions not realizing I was banned.
You know they used to try posting one of their "lolcows" here on occasion. This one Samus cosplayer, a Mexican amateur porn star with enormous breasts, one of their former mods. You can always tell it's one of them when they're posting a girl who is at least moderately attractive, and their reasons for her being a lolcow range from "Her make up sucks!" to "She's just a stupid bitch!" and "I bet she's a slut!"
5649b5 No.158120
File: 1440999936649.jpg (42.93 KB, 363x380, 363:380, the-jewish-conspiracy-is-w….jpg)

It's all a Jew conspiracy.
c04a85 No.158121
>>158112
His behavior would indicate it. When you ignore a woman who offers sex whenever you want it and prefer to watch porn instead, then you are picking porn over sex.
>>158113
>1980
>1984
>1981
>1978
Mine was from 2015. You can't use older than balls studies, society and methods have changed a lot.
>>158116
Are you fucking retarded? When you take a side and argue in it's favor, then that's a fucking bias. Do you not understand what a bias is?
>>158117
Crime as a whole has gone down, due to better police force, less drugs, ect.
1f8e1f No.158122
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>158111
I'm just quoting the song I linked since I've stopped giving even half of a week old under the shoe dried up crusty shit about what you have to say.
It's just my special little way of saying you're full of shit.
c04a85 No.158123
>>158120
Jews have always dominated porn. They also dominate Hollywood. This is why they try their hardest to normalize porn (as well as moral degeneracy in general) in the media. They don't try to hide it, either.
http://www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38
5649b5 No.158124
>>158121
Violent crime hit a 30 year low right after your little chart cuts off.
5649b5 No.158125
>>158123
An actual feminazi.
Tell is how the jews have kept you down. Get it all out.
e3e8e7 No.158126
>>158121
it doesn't matter if methods have changed or not, all of the previous studies it referenced back up the claim you're making, that it *MAY* increase agressive behavior in the short term. In the long term, you have absolutely no evidence to back that up.
Your study was actually from 2011, fucktard. And it's just the same shit as the studies that are referenced.
Also, maybe you should stop shitposting in order to get replies and actually read the introduction to your own evidence, summarizing the literature and stating there is no evidence linking pornography, violent or not, to any crime. It's just "agressive behavior" which means whether they would like to push the button that makes a loud noise towards the person who won the fake money or whatever shit methods they've got going on in social sciences these days. It's not a real science.
Get some reading comprehension.
c04a85 No.158127
>>158124
As I said, crime as a whole has gone down.
>>158122
Great argument. The only reason you faggots are getting upset is because you want to believe that porn is good and healthy and hate that I'm telling you otherwise.
>>158125
Speaking truthfully about god's chosen people makes u a nazi. When you can't criticize those who are in power, you're a brainwashed slave. A race who possesses this much wealth and power does not have the right to accuse everyone of racism for criticizing them. Enjoy your anime porn and video games.
e3e8e7 No.158128
>>158127
*violent pornography
5649b5 No.158129
>>158127
No. Specifically violent crime. Including rape.
5649b5 No.158130
>>158127
You really think that the jews control everything?
Enjoy your Nazi circlejerk.
1f8e1f No.158131
>>158127
Actually there's a lot of holes in you argument in need of a good fisting.
I'm not ripping into you like a virgin asshole because I'm posting without a keyboard.
Good job on proving me right by the way, actually going back to the post you skipped and replying to it after the conversation had gone past that.
The only think unhealthy here is your chunky vaj bitch, sorry to dissappoint but I'm not interested in hatefucking an angry tumblrina, as much as you so desperately want us all to ravage you.
1730db No.158132
>>158121
>His behavior would indicate it. When you ignore a woman who offers sex whenever you want it and prefer to watch porn instead, then you are picking porn over sex.
Sounds like the actions of an addict to me. Still not cheating however.
> Crime as a whole has gone down, due to better police force, less drugs, ect.
The reasons are many and varied but you can't ignore the fact the easy access to porn has shit his pants and done nothing to alter this trend. it *MAY* have helped not that I've seen any hard evidence to this.
1730db No.158134
>>158132
>The reasons are many and varied but you can't ignore the fact the easy access to porn has shit his pants and done nothing to alter this trend. it *MAY* have helped not that I've seen any hard evidence to this.
I am the master of the entire word typo
1730db No.158135
>>158132
>>158134
Did…I just find another word filter?
c04a85 No.158136
>>158126
>it doesn't matter if methods have changed or not
Actually, it matters a whole fucking lot and can illigitamize an entire study.
>Also, maybe you should stop shitposting in order to get replies and actually read the introduction to your own evidence, summarizing the literature and stating there is no evidence linking pornography, violent or not, to any crime
But it does link violent pornography to aggression. It explicitly states it. The study it referenced that did not show a correlation was the study you linked. It states that, since that experiment (which resulted in porn being legalized) that numerous other studies have been conducted, which have found a correlation between violent porn viewing and aggression.
c04a85 No.158137
>>158132
That means porn must have been responsible for the decrease in crime, right? Go look up "decline in crime since 90's". No respectable author will list porn as a cause.
c04a85 No.158139
>>158126
>stating there is no evidence linking pornography, violent or not, to any crime. It's just "aggressive behavior"
When did I say that it was directly connected to crime? Point to where I said this, please.
e3e8e7 No.158143
>>158136
>Actually, it matters a whole fucking lot
It doesn't really matter because it's just confirming the last six "studies" they've done about short-term aggression. You know, the same ones that were referenced in the actual long-term 1986 study I linked, they're the ones that are also referenced in yours.
Zero evidence for long-term "agression." It's like saying that because microwaves may inhibit sleep for an hour or so, that having a cell phone is bad because it prevents you from sleeping.
Social sciences aren't real sciences anyway, again.
1730db No.158146
>>158137
No idea, its certainly not made it worse.
f1e0ac No.158148
Raylene Winkel what the fuck is your problem, you don't think i KNOW ITS YOU? why are you wasting your time posting on fucking /cow/ about a shitty image board, you're 25 fucking years old.
why haven't you grown past this shit yet? It's been 8 fucking years EIGHT YEARS and I'd still notice your posts anywhere. And you bitch about your BF on the farm? man what the fuck is wrong with you, I wish I fucked some sense into you when I had the chance, well no use crying over spilt milk, next time think about what you're doing before you fucking sperg over a bunch of autists trying to defend your circlejerk forum.
Be a good girl now, I'll be waiting for you.
1f8e1f No.158153
f25769 No.158154
Nice, an argument about porn.
I just realized something. You guys remember that crazy militant black feminist who came here a while ago?
>>110335
She was so much more pleasant.
7541fd No.158169
Ragin' Raylene's giving me a raging erection.
e075df No.158176
Ah, this thread is a fun reminder that men and women are equally capable of being completely and hilariously terrible in all aspects
610726 No.158183
>>158058
Yes. Porn is the blight of modern society. Not the symptom of a decaying nation. But the cause of it. Just like how Jeffery Dahmer.said he murdered all those people, fucked their corpses, and ate them. Of course he also blamed the Devil. And Charles Darwin, along with Evolution. But you know what? All those that doesnt matter. Its Porn that's the issue here.
610726 No.158185
>>158123
Tfw no qt insecure anti semite gf.
d6c433 No.158252
>>158119
The asha, quirky and tumblr shoplifting threads also came from lolcow
72044e No.158271
>>158132
>Sounds like the actions of an addict to me. Still not cheating however.
Sounds like actions of a man who's more annoyed that desperate.
dd44ee No.158278
>>158132
Maybe he just can't stand her ugly ass anymore but is to much of a coward to dump her.
21014a No.158300
They hate us so much, they literally copy our threads:
https://lolcow.farm/pt/res/128373.html
71e16b No.158348
>>157890 here.
>Post a simple old screenshot last night.
>Come back this evening to discover all of this.
I seem to have an uncanny knack for rustling magi of all genders be they wizard, witch, or tranny lich.
f2971a No.158370
>>158300
I thought /cow/ and /pt/ were cool with each other.
Why are we at each other's throats all of a sudden?
546ef2 No.158376
>>158113
I don't know why you are scapegoating porn so hard here when the problem is men. Testosterone increases violent behavior, it's a problem with the men themselves and porn really has very little to do with it other than maybe making them slightly worse. That's like blaming the heat for making it smell like crap outside, when there are a bunch of horses standing around shitting everywhere.
It's pretty clear you're bitter because of your ex and that really bothers me. I hate how women never realize men are shit until they've personally been jilted when this should be really fucking obvious in the first place.
094ae1 No.158398
>>158370
Butthurt posters from /r9k/?
f25769 No.158414
>>158398
Just look at the horribly sexist stuff that r9k is doing.
597a3e No.158420
>>158026
>>158052
>>158004
>>158008
>>157997
>>157991
You know, years ago I used to question the logic of the anti-porn crowd, but after nearly 7 years of posting on the chans and watching some of those anti-porn TED talk videos, it really started to click, just based on observing channers (and myself, admittedly).
In 7 or so years I went from seeing a /v/ that was perpetually tfw no gf and often posted pictures of desirable, "perfect" girls, to abhorring women and only ever posting r34 and 2D girls. It sounds irrelevant, but after thinking about it a bit, I came to the conclusion that years of exposure to porn conditioned most channers into only being able to get off to porn and 2D girls, or even worse, depending on how bad the addiction had developed, being only able to get off to really depraved stuff, like the kind of cocks normally found on /d/. At this point they have no desire to form real relationships, only to endlessly chase the dragon and indulge in their addiction.
So no, women are not being abusive catladies for reviling men who beat off to porn, anymore than men are being prudish, controlling assholes for reviling sluts. Both porn use and promiscuity are damaging to healthy social relationships, and I am finding myself more and more pessimistic about the inability of most people to see that. Just look at this thread, dozens and dozens of angered replies directed towards some girl, all because she has the gall to prefer her bf not beat off to depraved videos like some cuckold.
e3e8e7 No.158431
>>158420
>like the kind of cocks normally found on /d/.
This wordfilter is creating more humor than most threads right now, for sure.
>anecdotal evidence
I guarantee you I can find, and in fact know, "normalfags" who perpetually beat off to depraved shit. Who are you kidding? This isn't anything exclusive to imageboards.
Also, implying /v/ is wizardchan. Even then you don't understand the mentality of actual wizard/jp faggots. Give them a cute assburger of the opposite sex who shares their interests and the façade disappears. They will do ANYTHING to fucking get someone like that.
>women are not being abusive catladies
The /cgl/ cap certainly is. Telling your partner that they should stop watching porn and fuck you more is fine. When you're threatening them or being hypercritical and wanting to totally control their eye movements, what they watch, what they think, etc, with thinly veiled manipulation behind the magic "love" word, that's psychological abuse.
We're telling the "GIRL" (I don't really even fucking care what gender they are) that the /cgl/ cap is in fact, filled with abusive relationships. Why they're so steadfast in defending it, is anyone's guess. Probably because they wanted some attention. Well, they got it.
75ce18 No.158437
>>156703
Men are always in control. They are like Jews. Sometimes they are both like with Femen.
f2971a No.158451
>>158398
>>158398
I'm willing to buy that. Any time I've been over there and said I was visiting from /cow/ I was treated cordially and joked around with a little. It's hard for me to have beef with them.
If people from /r9k/ are acting like retards over there we shouldn't let them drag us into it. Beyond some pointing and laughing at the retardation, of course, we have to indulge ourselves a little when people are producing cocks.
Becoming enemies with what amounts to our sister board seems stupid regardless and I hope /cow/pokes aren't supporting it.
82ee89 No.158798
>>158420
>controlling assholes for reviling sluts
See now you're comparing two entirely different situations
You're falling down the same rabbit hole than libtards who defend a black guy because "society" when that guy killed/raped 3 women and set them on fire just because the black guy is in death row when at the same time you have tons of black guys who are in jail for dumb shit like weed
You could say fat /v/irgins have no right to want to only "fug qt3.14s" that look like models when a lot of them are just as fat and ugly as many of the tumblr sjws they make fun of
But NO, you had to compare some guy beating off to weird porn to some gal literally taking any cock she can, as if both things carried the same consequences.
Fuck, you have any idea how bad is the sluttiness in the western world? fucking biologists are saying the hormones from birth control pills are killing the fucking fish
Again: not the pollution, not global warming, but sluts fucking around too much and taking pills to not get pregnant are so many these days that their urine its fucking up rivers, lakes and even coastal areas.
But go ahead tell me how bad porn is…
da3e36 No.159009
>>158420
I'm a man. I need to beat off to something. If a fat Tumblrina has it in her head that she don't need no man then I'm gonna beat off to porn. Just don't come crying to me when I don't want to pay for your bastard kids. Sue me, then buy a sand-blaster to blast the sand out of your vagina you miserable cunt. Porn is a symptom of the Sexual Revolution which lead to a breakdown of the traditional family. Feminism is what makes porn sell.
b0d2d8 No.159161
>>151161
>I would argue there was the occasional poster pointing out how how the thread was cancer, which it is
someone, out in that shitpile… heard my pleas.
literally, i wish i could find the post, but there was a girl on there saying that white women cannot be raped and it should only be considered "a temporary removal of oppression" and then went on to say how superior asians were and that many of them have natural blond hair and blue eyes and how superior they are
it's fucking batshit crazy, the thread is probably deleted by now because they started shitposting asians with ~natural blonde hair~
like, it can happen. BUT it's very rare
b0d2d8 No.159167
dcad54 No.159359
>>158420
>imprying
4chan was just a place full of anonymous people discussing shit that they liked. Then you had the media calling 4chan this internet abyss of monstrosities. Naturally people that are drawn to that are going to migrate. So you get these tranny faggots, the waifu faggots, and all these other douchebags shitting up place. Not even discussing the cocks, just shitposting with their "boypussy" fetishism.
This is the case of bad stock pushing out the good stock.
27d918 No.159371
>>158420
Your lack of self control isn't my problem, omegacuck.
fdf8f4 No.159661
>>157994
I just want to admit to start I haven't read through this entire thread so I might be missing something, but there's a conversation to be had here about gender dynamics in relationships.
First, as to why your partner may prefer to masturbate to you, sex is great, but sometimes you just want to get off quickly. Sometimes you don't want to feel exhausted afterwards or have to consider someone else's pleasure. This is true for both men and women. Sometimes one person has more of a libido than the other.
Personal anecdote, I dated a gorgeous girl who had BPD once. The sex was constant, and amazing, but over time she became more selfish about it. She cut off the oral sex altogether, and she started wanting to focus solely on sex acts and positions that turned me off or were exhausting. I tried to keep her satisfied, tried to meet in the middle, but before long we'd ended up compromising at just regular old missionary sex. It worked for me because I need to see her face, and eye contact, and it's one of the least strenuous of positions so I could keep pumping and remain hard without cumming for the hours it would often take her to achieve orgasm (and before you say anything, at this point this is in addition to her having a vibrating egg on her clit and another one in her ass with a plug behind it and clamps on her nipples and all manner of other excessive shit.)
At a certain point it just became too much work. I found myself sneaking off to the bathroom with my laptop and jerking off to porn. We went from fucking six times a day to three times a day to once a day and me sneaking to the bathroom to rub one out.
Now, your objection to porn brings up an argument I've had with many, many girls I've dated over the years. If a guy gets a pocket pussy or onahole or fleshlight or god forbid a realdoll, he's a loser. He's pathetic, he can't get laid. Now, personally I'd never get one because I had a friend in high school who bought a fleshlight and after using it found he couldn't orgasm with girls anymore and made a series of incredibly stupid, terrible decisions after that in order to get back the level of arousal he needed to cum (short version: guy was a scumbag and got off on slipping off the condom and cumming in girls without telling them, and he moved across country to dodge paying child support.)
That aside, it's perfectly fine for women to buy dildos and vibrators and hitachi wands, rabbits, butt plugs and everything else. A guy is somehow a pervert for looking at porn, but it's fine for girls to do it, and read and write erotic fiction.
Guys are scumbags for preferring women with larger breasts or bigger butts, but it's fine for women to drool over men who look more like girls, or are really tall, or because of their accents or some other equally superficial reason.
I've had so many conversations with girls where they'll go on and on about every celebrity they think is hot, every guy who is "cute" or "sexy" and "gets me so fucking wet" and then I'll name some girl I think is "pretty" or "has a nice figure" and then it becomes a fucking interrogation. "Her? You like her? But she's so ugly! What the fuck is wrong with you?! She's a stupid slut! You just like her because she's a SLUT! Men are so stupid! Men are so shallow! That whore should DIE!"
I wish I was exaggerating but for an example, my current girlfriend flies into a rage if Hannah Minx is brought up, and swears up and down that the reason Hannah Minx has disappeared from YouTube is because she personally murdered her. She's joking of course, but the rage is very real.
a87cfc No.159710
>>159649
Shit, I can't figure out any order to read this in where it makes sense. "I'll kill you" seems like it should be last but with it's positioning you can't just left to right or right to left or start in the top and go down the line before moving over. There's no way to read this that makes sense what the fuck,
b0d2d8 No.159725
i don't get what is so wrong with porn and masturbation
just because he jacks off or watches porn doesn't mean he doesn't find you sexually attractive or that he prefers other girls or anything. If that were true he would just cheat or dump you.
holy shit, i don't get why female wizards think this is manipulative or abusive
12691e No.159751
>>157994
I doubt you are receptive to sex EVERY time he is horny and nature has programmed us to seek variety when it comes to sex partners. I am going to assume you aren't too dense enough to understand a basic cost/benefit analysis of sex and reproduction with respect to our differing biology.
It has literally nothing to do with you, and I am sure he prefers sex with you over porn but even if you were a perfect 10 and your vagina was open to him 24/7/365, it would not erase his primal instincts.
This is what pisses off a lot of guys. Men have been trying to figure out and understand female sexuality since the dawn of time. Granted, its generally been with the goal of getting more sex that we engage in this pursuit, but at least we try.
Male sexuality is much, much simpler than female sexuality, but woman can come on forums like this and get honest, straightforward answers from real men explaining things in the simplest of terms. You may not like the answers, but your feels don't change the answers. The fact that men still get shit for watching porn, or "objectification", or any number of things that women use to demonize male sexuality is good evidence of the inherently narcissistic nature of women, in my opinion. It's like it is impossible for a woman to imagine that other people, even of the opposite sex, think differently than they do and they are unwilling to make an attempt to understand them.
d39b3e No.160179
>>158431
>I guarantee you I can find, and in fact know, "normalfags" who perpetually beat off to depraved shit. Who are you kidding? This isn't anything exclusive to imageboards.
That's part of my point, though. Porn use has become so normalized that everyone uses it, I was just using imageboard users as an example because the consequences of frequent, long-term porn use is more obvious and observable in their case.
There's plenty of research that's been published on the consequences of porn use, anyway, in the case that you're simply going to shoo away any anecdotal evidence I provide. Great Porn Experiment comes to mind.
>>158798
>Fuck, you have any idea how bad is the sluttiness in the western world? fucking biologists are saying the hormones from birth control pills are killing the fucking fish
AFAIK the main cause of male infertility and lowered testosterone levels in both the human and animal world is a result of plastic pollution, in particular Bisphenol A. Horrifyingly, BPA is mostly used in plastic designed for cups, bags, or other drinking implements or items for holding food, so it effects humans from an extremely early age (even baby bottles are made using this stuff). I don't disbelieve the idea that contraceptives have a hand in it - all those chemicals woman take and end up pissing out are gonna end up somewhere - though I think you are overstating its effect somewhat.
But anyway, whether or not what you are saying is 100% true, it's a bad argument to defend something because there is something else that is worse. Why can't someone be against both promiscuity and porn, even if their negative effects aren't equal?
>>159359
Not really going to argue with this (I've seen the various /v/'s and /pol/'s come and go in terms of quality userbases), but it's not really relating to my point.
>>159661
>>159009
>>159725
Not really disagreeing with these points, however bear in mind that you are all confusing masturbation and masturbation using porn. I'm sure 99% of the male population has jerked off at some point or another and the world hasn't ended, but throw in regular porn use over an extended period of time and you're going to see consequences, namely desensitization to normal sex acts, requiring more intense/depraved acts to get off, lowered testosterone and lowered motivation.
This line is also telling of this confusion:
> A guy is somehow a pervert for looking at porn, but it's fine for girls to do it, and read and write erotic fiction.
I think there is a pretty big difference between a woman masturbating to romance novels once a week and a guy beating off to gangbang cuck porn 3 times a day. It's like saying having a glass of wine once a week and being a heroine junkie are identical.
Not to say women are incapable of becoming porn addicts - I've actually known one, and it's a really bizarre thing to witness - but in general porn use is primarily a male problem, since it appeals more to male sexual desire and preys on the addictive complex that humans have.
And for the record, no, I'm not anti-masturbation. Pretty sure most men, single, married or not, jerk it any chance they get, given the hurried lives of early marriages.
My argument is against porn specifically.
>>159371
Not even sure what your point is, but lol at the irony of someone who masturbates while watching other people have sex calling someone else a cuck.
e3e8e7 No.160207
>>160179
>There's plenty of research that's been published on the consequences of porn use, anyway, in the case that you're simply going to shoo away any anecdotal evidence I provide. Great Porn Experiment comes to mind.
Yeah I've watched that video before, it's full of horse shit making scientific claims where there are none, misrepresenting studies and even at one point iirc citing a study without controls as confirming his pre-conceived bias.
Next time try not to be sold a crock of shit. There may be problems with porn habits, but you certainly haven't demonstrated any scientific studies that validate your assertions. And then it doesn't actually justify cat ladies abusing the sad sacks that they've picked up.
>namely desensitization to normal sex acts, requiring more intense/depraved acts to get off, lowered testosterone and lowered motivation.
Isn't lowered testosterone a good thing, seeing as you were the one rambling about the horrible aggression of males earlier? Or are you another faggot? Either way, of your assertions are are actually supported by any studies. Ones with control groups.
b0d2d8 No.160235
>>160179
is your boyfriend watching porn that big of a deal to you?
like, holy crap
7a7a3a No.160249
The hijacking of this thread by some ugly feminazi is just proof that grills are not part of chan culture and never will be due to being unable to deal with critisism and being assblasted constantly.
12691e No.160258
>>160179
>I think there is a pretty big difference between a woman masturbating to romance novels once a week and a guy beating off to gangbang cuck porn 3 times a day.
Sure is, but what if he only beats off to gangbang cuck porn once a week rather than 3 times a day? Porn is not SuperHeroinMeth+, not all guys are instantly addicted to the stuff and unable to stop jerking off.
fdf8f4 No.160426
>>160179
>I think there is a pretty big difference between a woman masturbating to romance novels once a week and a guy beating off to gangbang cuck porn 3 times a day. It's like saying having a glass of wine once a week and being a heroine junkie are identical.
Now you're just attacking male sexuality. Women are just as likely to become masturbation addicts.
In my rambling mess of a post, I gave an anecdote about one of my exes. Instead of porn (though she did look at it on occasion) she desensitized herself with sex toys. This is ridiculously common with women. They buy a vibrator because they can't bring themselves to orgasm with just their fingers, then they find they can't orgasm from regular sex. Before long they're adding other things to try to achieve a greater sensation. Inserting larger objects, more clitoral vibration, stuff in their ass, vibrating nipple clamps. The most popular type of vibrator for women is the jackrabbit. What is a jackrabbit? Let's diagram this shit out. First off there's the shaft. The shaft itself is vibrating, but depending on the model it either pumps in and out on it's own, or it has rotating beads inside. Sometimes both. The main feature though is a small rabbit extended from the top (sometimes it's other animals, but this is the most common.) The rabbit has it's own motor which causes it's tiny ears to vibrate back and forth against the clit. Some models take this further by having a second appendage for anal insertion.
Even if it's just a vibrator, tell me, how many guys do you know who remain as hard as plastic and vibrate during sex?
Compared to a guy rubbing his dick to a video of a girl taking a load, what woman do is volumes more desensitizing.
2755d9 No.160429
>>160249
Not to mention that estrogen has the side effect of producing critical levels of unfunnyness.
01d74b No.160433
>>160249
Yeah, this basically proves OP's point or something, women on chans are /r9k/-tier
7a7a3a No.160485
>>160258
I jack it once per day on average. Probably enough to trigger feminazi's and their disgusting cunts hidden under greasy fat folds.
7a7a3a No.160488
>>160426
Women having a massive collection of dildo's ranging from the vibrating finger size to two foot long double enders they have to pound themselves with whilst also using a vibrator and their fingers getting it dirty with shit and vagina juices is way more disgusting than a guy fapping in the morning's/evening to whatever his fetish happens to be that day. Pic very much related.
I think a lot of this masturbation shaming female wizards/feminazi's who are ugly as sin do is purely projection. Girls grow up with different expectations of sexuality then men on top of a significantly lower sex drive so they feel shame for masturbating. Whereas most guys don't, it's implied that men masturbate but it isn't that women do. So some anti-patriachy cunt is gonna go to town on herself and then cry about it afterwards and blame men for feeling like a loose used up whore.
daebd6 No.160657
>>160207
I think the barely-concealed bitterness in this post is telling. You can always tell a porn addict when they react to criticism of their favorite consumable with outright hostility, and it's doubly ironic that you're melting down on /cow/, of all places.
and anyway, that video isn't some isolated thing, there's plenty of research to be found on the subject
http://www.winmentalhealth.com/pornography.effects.php
http://yourbrainonporn.com/research-confirms-sharp-rise-youthful-ed
http://yourbrainonporn.com/brain-structure-and-functional-connectivity-associated-pornography-consumption-2014
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00027.x/abstract
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-009-9585-4
>>160235
>>160249
Oops, I've been found out! I'm really a bitter old catlady!
Naw, I'm a dude, and I find it hilarious that any criticism of porn use is met with accusations of being some obese feminist. Shock news, it's the feminists who are one of the big groups pushing porn, since I guess in their minds, some drug-addled teen being throatfucked on camera is "liberating". How? Who knows, but then again feminism was never exactly devoid of that kind of cognitive dissonance.
Hey, I can even give an example of that in pic-related! It's a shame, too. In a less diseased age, she could have just been a cute girl, but unfortunately the sickening period we live in urges her to live a life of compulsory narcissism and self-isolating sexual behavior. She'll probably resemble a leathery old bag in only a few years.
>>160258
Obviously, the effects are not going to be the same for everyone. Just as not everyone becomes addicted to slot machines or WoW or what have you, porn is not going to lead to compulsion for everyone. However, unlike videogames or gambling or what have you, the dangers of porn lie in what it can do to the psychosexual health of developing teens and young adults. A 50 year old man beating off is one thing, but give people access to this stuff during those crucial developing years and you have a serious social disease in the making.
>>160426
>>160488
This is an interesting thought I didn't consider much, and it's good you bring it up, because it is a reasonable counterpoint to my arguments, and it hits home a little, since years ago I had experiences with a girl who often used sex toys, yet it was borderline impossible for me to get her off the old-fashioned way.
In general, men seem more sexually stimulated by the audio, the visual and the tactile, while women are more stimulated by the act of penetration (or masturbation) itself, so it follows that women would have their own equivalent to porn in the form of implements for masturbation.
It's not entirely different, anyway. Porn uses audio/video technology to simulate sex, but unlike sex which is limited, porn allows what is essentially an infinite library of "mates", who have all been carefully given makeup, waxing treatments and other implements to get them as close to perfection as possible, offering something that is essentially more appealing than real sex, in its own way. Similarly dildos and vibrators offer the sensation of stimulation and penetration, but technology allows it to improve upon some of the flaws of an actual human cock, and so the result is something that is just "better" than real sense, and like porn, will end up desensitizing the user, and will further alienate them from the opposite sex.
I think I'm starting to see the angle of the Luddites and Kaczynski now.
12e616 No.160703
>>160488
Woman have greater sex drives then men. Trust me.
7a7a3a No.160813
>>160703
>Woman have greater sex drives then men. Trust me.
Some women go years without an orgasm. Women overall do not masturbate or cum anyway near as often as men and their period of time when they are sexually active is curtailed more by child bearing, and societal factors. Simply put women are far less sexual then men.
>>160657
>yet it was borderline impossible for me to get her off the old-fashioned way.
Funny that when we think of shaming masturbation we don't instantly think ot this since it has a tangible physical impact on their lives where as with men it's more of a short term mental stimulation. Tell me was this chick a little nuts? She sounds it. I hope you weren't cucked for long.
7a5f19 No.160858
>>152799
>ozma
Isn't that some SA mod?
7a5f19 No.160890
>>157890
>when I started dating my boyfriend, I formated the HD, I don't put up with that sort of crap. I don't want my boyfriend masturbating for other women
I'm so glad I'm gay sometimes.
e3e8e7 No.160900
>>160207
>I think the barely-concealed bitterness
If my posts are bitter to you, you need to get your head checked out.
But since you want to keep derailing the thread and being a faggot about this, as a holier-than-thou rambling about porn addiction and desensitization (while not actually linking to any evidence to back up these assertions), you can take these, that actually prove you wrong on several assertions you made:
There is no evidence to suggest that your idea of "porn addiction" actually exists: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26095441
Feel free to actually point to point to something that presents a model of "porn" "addiction" comparable to actual addiction. Words mean things, big shocker.
2012 review of the literature, looking at the effects of internet porn on adolescents, found no conclusive evidence suggesting that "pornography leads to unrealistic sexual beliefs, more permissive attitudes and more experimentation." https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/25724267/the-impact-of-internet-pornography-on-adolescents-a-reuniting
Viewing pornography increased couples’ desire to be with their significant other, whether they’d seen the pornographic film alone or together: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23224749
There is no evidence that there's such a thing as "porn desensitization" i.e. the more porn you watch the more extreme the cocks needs to become, nor is there any evidence to suggest pornography is likely to impact sexual arousal responsitivity, in fact it's the opposite. Evidence suggests that watching more pornography increased arousal to less explicit material - AND INCREASED THE DESPIRE OF SEX WITH THEIR PARTNERS. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sm2.58/abstract
> With these data from a wide variety of communities, cultures and countries we can better evaluate the thesis that an abundance of sexual explicit material invariably leads to an increase of illegal sexual activity and eventually rape. Similarly we can now better reconsider the conclusion of the Meese Commission and others that there exists "a causal relationship to antisocial acts of sexual violence and … unlawful acts of sexual violence" (Meese, 1986, page 326). Indeed, the data reported and reviewed suggests that the thesis is myth and, if anything, there is an inverse causal relationship between an increase in pornography and sex crimes.
http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/2005to2009/2009-pornography-acceptance-crime.html
e3e8e7 No.160901
12e616 No.160904
>>160813
You don't get out much. Girls can be very sexually agressive and there is a reason why they make more vibrators than plastic holes to fuck. They also print a lot of "romance novels" and have you ever pondered the popularity of Justin Beiber?
8eec95 No.160931
>>160858
Oh man, look her up on ED or something, it's quite the read.
e401b7 No.160978
>>160813
>Tell me was this chick a little nuts? She sounds it. I hope you weren't cucked for long.
Not gonna lie, she was probably the most unhinged person I've ever met, and I was only with her because we were both just dumbass horny teenagers. Wasn't with her for very long, though, fortunately.
>>160900
>(while not actually linking to any evidence to back up these assertions)
Actually, I linked a plethora of published studies and articles in my previous post. Maybe when you type up your next fuming post, you could actually try reading mine.
>There is no evidence to suggest that your idea of "porn addiction" actually exists: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26095441
> https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/25724267/the-impact-of-internet-pornography-on-adolescents-a-reuniting
You know, I was genuinely curious at to what bizarre studies you were going to link me proving that the sky is green, especially given your claim that porno actually increases sexual desire (might want to file that study away along with anything the Flat Earth Society produces), but I think it's clear after looking at these articles that you do indeed have a problem reading.
>Participants (N=122) who either reported or denied problematic VSS use were presented with emotional, including explicit sexual, images while their evoked response potentials were recorded.
>Participants viewing both the erotic and exciting films reported equivalent increases in excitement; however, the erotic film was rated as slightly more generally arousing and increased participant's desire to be close to their partner.
>Nontreatment-seeking men (N = 280) reported their weekly average VSS viewing in hours. VSS hours were examined in relation to the sexual arousal experienced while viewing a standardized sexual film in the laboratory and erectile problems experienced with a sexual partner.
The fact that you linked these to me as proof of me being wrong is so baffling, it's like you didn't even read the articles. The subjects in these tests weren't told to masturbate or autostimulate while viewing the porno, viewing was the only thing they did.
So unless you're trying to convince me that the majority of porn users don't masturbate to it, these studies are proof of absolutely nothing, other than that "viewing" - again, the key word being "viewing" and "viewing" only - porn causes general arousal.
It's like you've tried to convince me that there's nothing wrong with huffing a can of gasoline everyday because you regularly fill your car up at the station. They're two completely different things entirely, and the fact that you've just desperately hurled these banal studies shows how obsessed you are to defend your habit.
Oh yeah, and that last study:
>Similarly we can now better reconsider the conclusion of the Meese Commission and others that there exists "a causal relationship to antisocial acts of sexual violence and … unlawful acts of sexual violence"
Ignoring that I never once in this entire thread argued for the idea that porn has caused a spike in rape and sex crimes, this data only furthers my argument that masturbating to porn regularly deteriorates the sex drive. You think some guy desperate enough to rape some poor girl is going to risk that, when he could just go jerk off to some rape porn online? Or more to my point, do you think jacking it several times a day over the course of years and years is not going to negatively effect your testosterone level, the thing that determines your motivation and sex drive?
Here's a thought, try going on /fit/ and convincing them that cranking on your pecker to porn every day has no effect on testosterone or motivation. You'll get accusations of baiting in a matter of moments.
Also, reposting those articles I posted earlier, but I guess I'll have to cross my fingers in the hope that you actually read them:
http://yourbrainonporn.com/research-confirms-sharp-rise-youthful-ed
http://yourbrainonporn.com/brain-structure-and-functional-connectivity-associated-pornography-consumption-2014
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00027.x/abstract
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-009-9585-4
(by the way, the information regarding a rise in ED among adolescent males is particularly alarming. It's not unlike discovering a rise in hair loss among 10 year olds)
27d918 No.160987
>>160179
>Not even sure what your point is, but lol at the irony of someone who masturbates while watching other people have sex calling someone else a cuck.
Because you plus the super butthurt dangerhair thats been posting in this thread cannot separate fantasy from reality.
Yes there is a problem with porn addiction but hows that different to any other addiction? Banning things just make it a thousand times worse.
But its still fantasy, all you virgins who keep saying watching porn is like being the same room with people having sex a clueless beyond belief.
e3e8e7 No.161019
>>160978
>Actually, I linked a plethora of published studies
None backing up any specific assertions.
>You know, I was genuinely curious at to what bizarre studies you were going to link me proving that the sky is green.
>So unless you're trying to convince me that the majority of porn users don't masturbate to it
You didn't refute anything. Addicts show increased brain reactions to the object of addiction. There's no model suggesting that what you call "porn addiction" is actually addiction to pornography. Perhaps hypersexuality, but not addiction to pornography. Feel free to prove me wrong, by actually posting evidence. Oh wait, you never make specific assertions. Silly me.
http://www.health.harvard.edu/mind-and-mood/the_addicted_brain
http://www.prlog.org/12469869-porn-problems-unlike-any-known-addiction-in-largest-neuroscience-study.html
e3e8e7 No.161031
>>160978
Also I love how you ignore the other studies that you can't refute, in your squirmy little brain with your holier-than-thou attitude, as if you know addiction better than fucking neuroscientists who study it.
>masturbating to porn regularly deteriorates the sex drive
That's just masturbating. What does the pornography have to do with it, other than an aid? I can crank one out several times a day using my imagination, where's the requirement for pornography? You have any evidence backing that up? Or is that just like everything else you post, in that you just post random studies that have nothing to do with the claims that you are making. :^)
a40063 No.161486
>>160987
This isn't about fantasy vs. reality so much as it is about desensitization and novelty-seeking, things that could easily wreck a sexual relationship with a real person.
>Banning things just make it a thousand times worse.
Much like how making murder and rape illegal made those issues a thousand times worse.
>>161019
>None backing up any specific assertions.
Beep boop, none backing up any assertions, Captain.
From a study that was heavily referenced in the second link, regarding, desensitization and a depletion of motivation (it can be found here: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1874574 )
>A representative Swedish study on adolescent boys has shown that boys with daily consumption showed more interest in deviant and illegal types of pornography and more frequently reported the wish to actualize what was seen in real life.
>In partnerships, a decrease in sexual satisfaction and a tendency to adopt pornographic scripts have been associated with frequent Internet pornography consumption. A longitudinal study following Internet users has found that accessing pornography online was predictive of compulsive computer use after 1 year.
>Similar to theories taken from addiction research, it has been speculated in popular science literature that pornography constitutes a prewired, naturally rewarding stimulus and that high levels of exposure result in a downregulation or habituation of the neural response in the reward network. This is assumed to elicit adaptive processes in which the brain is hijacked, becoming less responsive to pornography.
There's also this excerpt, which, while not entirely related to the argument, is interesting nonetheless, and supportive of the idea that skinnerbox systems and overstimulation are not restricted to human psychology:
>Interestingly, the phenomenon is not restricted to humans; a recent study found that male macaque monkeys gave up juice rewards to watch pictures of female monkeys’ bottoms
>>161019
>There's no model suggesting that what you call "porn addiction" is actually addiction to pornography. Perhaps hypersexuality, but not addiction to pornography. Feel free to prove me wrong, by actually posting evidence.
From a Cambridge Study, found here: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0102419#s3
>Subjective ratings of desire and liking of videos were dissociated in which there was a group-by-rating-type-by-video-type interaction (F(1,30) = 4.794, p = 0.037): desire ratings to explicit videos were greater in CSB compared to healthy volunteers (F = 5.088, p = 0.032) but not to erotic cues (F = 0.448, p = 0.509), whereas liking ratings to erotic cues were greater in CSB compared to healthy volunteers (F = 4.351, p = 0.047) but not to explicit cues (F = 3.332, p = 0.079). The desire and liking scores to explicit cues were significantly correlated (HV: R2 = 0.696, p<0.0001; CSB: R2 = 0.363, p = 0.017) although the linear regression was not significantly different between groups (F = 2.513, p = 0.121). There were also no differences in the video-rating scores for desire and liking for each condition between the scanned healthy volunteers and an additional 25 healthy volunteers suggesting the subjective ratings to the videos were representative (p's>0.05). All subjects reported they had not previously seen the videos prior to the study.
In other words, people with Compulsive Sexual Behavior had a much greater desire to view erotic cocks, but their actual sexual reaction to the videos were weakened.
I actually read your articles, and while you do appear correct in that "sex addiction" does not fit the standard model of addiction that can be applied to substance abuse or gambling, it's likely that porn addiction (and sex addiction, for that matter) are different in terms of how they effect the brain, yet can still cause a compulsive desire, hence the term "Compulsive Sexual Behavior" ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2945841/ ). It's interesting to note that the article you posted, while measuring the effect of porn specifically, seemed to lump it in with CSB.
I suspect a reason for CSB having a different effect on the brain than addictive substances or other traditionally addicting things might be due to these actions being explicitly sexual, and thus involving orgasm, which could certainly effect brain chemistry in a more (or maybe less) radical way, however that is just a guess.
a40063 No.161492
(continued from the previous post)
>>161031
>>161031
> as if you know addiction better than fucking neuroscientists who study it.
There's that bitterness showing through again.
This isn't some crackpot theory, as the links I have posted have proven, there are plenty of psychologists and neuroscientists pursuing research into this particular area.
The effects of porn on psychology are not yet fully understood, seeing as freely-available, easily-accessible HD internet porn is a relatively new phenomenon. I suspect within the next 10 years, the dysgenic and addictive (or compulsory) effects of porn will be much better understood, and there will be a greater movement by the medical community to combat its reach and influence.
>>161031
>That's just masturbating. What does the pornography have to do with it, other than an aid?
Porn specifically causes desensitization, read a few paragraphs north of this sentence.
> where's the requirement for pornography?
Of course there is no requirement (if there were I'd imagine we wouldn't have survived as a species for very long), however from the ubiquitousness of porn throughout the internet and its use among most of the population under 40, it's clear an enormous amount of people who masturbate also use porn as an aid.
This isn't directly related to your question, however it should be noted that part of regular porn use is the conditioning of the brain. This has two major effects:
1). premature erectile dysfunction
http://yourbrainonporn.com/research-confirms-sharp-rise-youthful-ed
>A 1999 cross-sectional study (based on data gathered in 1992) published by the Journal of the American Medical Association reported erectile dysfunction rates of only 5%, and low sexual desire in 5%. In that study, the ages of the men surveyed ranged from 18 to 59, so a third of them were over 40, which means the rates for sexually active men under 40 were lower.
>sing the IIEF-5, a 2012 cross-sectional study of Swiss men aged 18-24 found ED rates of 30%, and a 2010 Brazilian study of men 18-40 reported ED rates of 35%. A 2013 Italian study reported one in four patients seeking help for new onset ED were younger than 40. Astonishingly, the rate of severe ED was nearly 10% higher in younger men than in men over 40.
Maybe there's just something in the water, but these statistics coincide very nicely with the rise and availability of HD internet porn.
2). induction of fetishes and aberrant sexual behavior
http://yourbrainonporn.com/are-fetishes-innate
>This is where supernormally stimulating novel porn can really start morphing tastes. As desensitization sets in, the brain seeks more dopamine via novelty, seeking, shocking, forbidden, kinkier, etc. Pretty soon one can't get off to original tastes. Very scary, but usually reversible by stopping all porn/porn fantasy.
Here's a quote from a porn-recovery forum:
> I don't know if you check on a regular basis reddit, 'empty closet' etc… websites about the porn confusion/orientation, but there are just thousands of threads with people freaking out about why they want to suck cocks or watched wierd stuff after use of porn.
>Even the 'empty closet' forum is full of people, gay/bi/straight that are completly lost and confused about their orientation and they ALL mentionned their porn use.
>It looks like the high speed generation of porn users is now going online and asking for answers. On French forums, it's the same. So many don't know why they developed penis fetish or femdom addiction…there are litterally thousands of people reading the posts and the common factor of all those people is internet use (porn, chat, dating site).
As someone who at least casually uses the chans, you should have always been at least somewhat curious as to how people start liking dickgirl porn, or why furries exist. It isn't that some people are inherently that way, but rather that they were conditioned through porn, or they experienced some kind of misfired sexual imprinting, which porn allowed them to manifest more acutely.
Now in case that's too anecdotal for you, here's an essay putting forth a theory of sexual fetishes being acquired through conditioning, rather than as an innate part of the individual. While the essay is more about fetish development in general, rather than as they relate to porn specifically, it makes more sense in the context of the mass-availability of internet porn. I've always had a difficult time believing some people are just "born" being into traps or whatever.
www.reuniting.info/download/pdf/Pfaus_Sexual_Reward_2012.pdf
Oh, and by the way
>:^)
Ironic emojis and lmao's are always the last resort of some desperate poster shooting steam out of their ears but not wanting to appear mad. Might as well type "Look at how not-angry I am!" at this point.
e3e8e7 No.161573
>>161492
>There's that bitterness showing through again.
>This isn't some crackpot theory, as the links I have posted have proven, there are plenty of psychologists and neuroscientists pursuing research into this particular area.
But again, none proving that there's a model of pornography addiction that's actually scientific fact. Those are terms your stupid anti-porn site uses that you've copy-pasted from, while not being backed up by scientific evidence.
>regarding, desensitization and a depletion of motivation
Nothing in what you quoted actually talks about desensitization, requiring more explicit pornography to get off, it just talks about interest. You made that assertion earlier, and I already proved you wrong with http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sm2.58/abstract
So, again, no evidence, linking to studies that don't back up your claims. Typical.
That's because it's a compulsive sexual behavior, or hypersexuality. I'll have a medical doctor explain it to you:
www.socioaffectiveneuroscipsychol.net/index.php/snp/article/view/23833/32589
This review also shreds several studies you've linked in the thread so far, by the way. By a medical doctor, and not just some faggot like myself pointing out things like lack of control groups.
>Of course there is no requirement
Then it's masturbation that's a problem, and most of your railing against pornography is all for naught. PROTECT CHILDREN FROM THEIR SIN ZONES.
>Ironic emojis and lmao's are always the last resort
I'm making fun of you, because you're a holier-than-thou faggot who hasn't linked to any evidence backing up the specific assertions you made earlier. And you keep doing it.
Seeing as you are severely autistic, and obviously aren't going to stop having the need to justify the fact that you don't watch porn (without saging the thread, I might add) with your holier-than-thou additude, I'll leave it at this so you can get the last word. Maybe you should get your mental illness checked out before you throw stones at "porn" "addicts."
fbdfb1 No.161655
>>161573
Sorry to burst your bubble, but wasn't that advert a fake?
e3e8e7 No.161660
>>161655
It's a satire of anti-masturbation faggotry.
fbdfb1 No.162244
>>161660
But is that still a thing though? I thought we drowned out that mentality a few decades ago.
3e5ccd No.162313
>>162244
You still have anti-masturbation types out there, but they're mostly redpillers aka "No More Mr. 'Nice Guys'"
Because they can't feel anything because they jacked off to Black Lagoon too much Ah, who am I kidding, these closet cases probably beat off to G Gundam, they now have to tell us about how masturbation totally kills your sex drive or some bullshit when science could tell you that the amount of semen that comes (no pun intended) out after masturbation is nowhere near enough to kill your sex drive. Basically, a bunch of "Have No Fun" people running around.
12e616 No.162345
>>162244
My girlfriends parents are hilariously anti masturbation. So no. It's still a thing with Baptists. Which is why she has me stash all her sex toys at my place. Like two drawers full at this point. Also since we have a lot of sex that sort of proves that one isn't going to sate the urge for the other. Though she hilariously hates porn. Basically she just masturbates in the tub.
12e616 No.162349
>>161492
Ever been in the basement of a museum? It's filled with antique porn. Stuff they only drag out for the general public every so often and often bring out during private fund raisers. The very word porn comes from pornos which was a class of prostitute which often performed. Technically it's the masculine form but…. Anyway you could pay to watch woman fuck themselves with fruit while you masturbated, or even watched people fuck if so inclined. You didn't need the internet. Then came the motion picture. Some of the earliest examples of personal motion photography are indeed pornographic in nature. Then came the cinema… Skip forward and everyone has a vcr porn stash.
8dd708 No.162379
>>162345
>>162349
Absolutely degenerate.
>>162345
>has you
>uses two full drawers worth of sex toys instead
>pic related
952250 No.162383
Self-esteem issues tend to happen.
b5852b No.162484
>>162313
Horseshoe theory strikes again. Hell, wouldn't it be healthier to keep the plumbing in use rather than let it get backed up?
I think a lot of problems here come from men and women having different sex drives in ways that are difficult to explain. But while most men in the internet age (or at least me) have pretty much gotten over 99% of hangups about whatever girls do to get themselves off, many women still have a LOT of hangups about sexuality, both their own, other women's and men.
b0d2d8 No.163398
>>160657
i never called you a fat crazy cat lady. I just said you are taking porn way too seriously
12e616 No.163407
>>163398
Probably due to the toxoplasma Gondii she got from all those cats.
304c39 No.164019
>>158348
>be they wizard, witch, or tranny lich
82ee89 No.164059
>>158111
>science!
>posts zero link to recent studies
BTW any studies from the 70s and 80s are shit
9bc5fb No.164077
Can this thread be nominated for lolcow status?
Forum full of men pretending to be women (this is how all these places are) and the one token woman from there who is upset about /lolcow/ linking to it comes here to start a bitch fest on how shitty men are and how they shouldn't look at porn because it deprives attention from her.
/r9k/ might be pathetic, but at least it doesn't shit up a good milking.
12e616 No.164103
>>158111
Violent acts of lovemaking? How terrible. Better throw out all my girlfriends bdsm stuff. She's turning me into a monster…what the fuck are you on about?
57a5f8 No.164106
Out of all of you faggots who had to come to shit up our board it had to be the Revy avatar-fag
b40d49 No.164138
>>164106
We're not suppose to talk about her!
12e616 No.164143
>>164138
I thought we weren't respecting pronouns.
6ca257 No.164146
6ca257 No.164148
>>164106
>Out of all of you faggots who had to come to shit up our board it had to be the Revy avatar-fag
Really? That's hillarious. We got your jellous cosplayer, though, so it's a fair trade.
f25769 No.164157
>>164007
I've seen squirting/peeing arguments before but the one in that thread is so much more entertaining.
f81e03 No.164210
>>160657
Dildos and vibrators are disgusting objects of hostility toward and objectification of men. Women who use them are desperate, misandrist, and entitled.
b0d2d8 No.164339
>>164077
are you kidding? this is a laugh riot
6c31cc No.165081
File: 1442147424876.png (274.81 KB, 1080x1025, 216:205, Screenshot_2015-09-13-08-1….png)

ccee3f No.165091
>>161486
>Much like how making murder and rape illegal made those issues a thousand times worse.
False equivalence, most people dont' get their rocks off on this. Likely an evolved trait so you know, we don't go around destroying our own race.
8b6c23 No.165095
>>158420
best post itt. why cant people just be sane?
f25769 No.165127
File: 1442160609463.jpg (15.27 KB, 308x419, 308:419, 1627bf31-9037-4710-9d1d-86….jpg)

>>165095
A sane person would have said, 'If porn makes women feel physically inadequate, then they should compensate by having good personalities.'
12e616 No.165149
>>161486
You never show a link that proves causation. Maybe they consume more porn because gasp they are deviants. Also while we are at it we might as well ban drawings and writings along the same lines. It's the same arguement that was used to push the comic book code. They said that kids who read violent comic books were more prone to violent fantasy… Seduction of innocence and all that nonesense. It even went before congress. Arrest have been made. People have been convicted and even gone to jail. Over comic books. All because of this same mentality and the same measure of truth you are applying here. It's bullshit. Penn and Teller did a pretty good episode on how the war on porn is bullshit and included the same studies you cite. Counter arguements were strong, oh but since one of the hosts is part Jewish it doesn't count. Right?
You sicken me.
7b4f94 No.165160
>>158130
Yes goy, us jews don't control anything, especially not porn and hollywood. :^)
12e616 No.165189
>>165160
Shouldn't you be pretending to be a feminist or editing Ben Garrison cartoons in your basement? Maybe posting on wizardchan?
41cc28 No.165284
File: 1442186562513.jpg (91.96 KB, 287x360, 287:360, awshitnegerdasgodverdommee….jpg)

7b4f94 No.165343
>>165189
I'm sorry, did I trigger you? Nice projection, faggot.
8b6c23 No.165348
>>165127
nah its just dumb, don't understand why people have to be so sex-crazed (both men and women.) women are starting to watch just as much of that trash. its desensitizing. try not watching porn for a month and then watching some softcore shit, it feels like you're a new person. honestly if i dont watch porn for like a month im overcome with so much more lust that i could probably nut to a picture of a blurry titty
41cc28 No.165471
>>165343
>/pol/fag gets subtly BTFO'd by another /cow/boy
>uses the trigger and projection cancer
Yep, this guy really is a Jew himself.
Breathe some cyanide, faggot. We don't want your shit on /cow/
12e616 No.165532
>>165471
What's funny is that the Jew actually btfo the /pol/tard. Happy Rosh Hashanah, motherfucker.
12e616 No.165549
>>165348
You know what would work even better? If we made all the woman cover themselves up when not with their husbands. Or you could try not forcing your life style choices on others.
d4d2bd No.165599
I can't believe this prudish nigger still keeps derailing the thread
Time to post more lolposts
cdefb2 No.165605
>>165471
All that subhuman butthurt.
12e616 No.165627
>>165605
Yes, those white trash /pol/ tears sure are tasty.
341653 No.165632
>>156553
Do the psychotic jackasses here tone it down real often
cdefb2 No.165703
>>165627
>Breathe some cyanide, faggot. We don't want your shit on /cow/
Keep pretending that you didn't get completely buttblasted back there.
It's all right to cry sometimes, I'd also cry if I weren't white.
12e616 No.165728
>>165703
That wasn't me. Check post IDs. More importantly, that was definitely a white dude. Jews wouldn't tell other Jews to gas themselves like that. Jewish insults are a bit more colorful.
Why are you trying so hard?
80adcc No.165731
cdefb2 No.165761
>>165728
>Why are you trying so hard?
Do you feel that I'm trying hard?
Maybe you feel a bit butthurt, but you don't want to admit it?
Just let it out, my non-white friend.
12e616 No.165762
File: 1442258913184.jpg (105.92 KB, 600x662, 300:331, dogs-just-want-to-watch-th….jpg)

>>165761
Jesus Christ. All this mad just because I jokingly compared a tard to a more well known tard. Just get over it.
cdefb2 No.165763
>>165762
That's right.
Let the butthurt flow from your subhuman ass.
12e616 No.165765
>>165763
If you're going make this thread about your feels as a white man we are going to need more about you.
cdefb2 No.165767
>>165765
>No u
Well, that got boring pretty fast.
6f85e3 No.165776
>>165767
I'm glad you see it our way, but there are more graceful ways to back out than this. For example, stop posting. Just leave.
cdefb2 No.165782
>>165776
What's wrong?
Did someone hurt your feelings?
3fac69 No.165879
>>165865
>imgur picture of a shitpost from 4chan
Tip top bait, dearie.
cdefb2 No.165920
>>165865
I don't think I've ever posted a may-may in all the time I've visited Chan sites.
8dd708 No.165948
155271 No.166095
>>165920
You posted several in this thread, including "let the butthurt flow". Maybe its time to step.away from the keyboard.
1f8e1f No.166125
>>165348
Sounds like you lack self control, and are confusing porn with
NOT JERKING OFF
for fucks sake I'm tired of you retards shitting everything up with your own warped perspective.
Of fucking course you'd feel like that if you never got sexual release for a month, it's fucking biologically hardwired into the male anatomy to need to beat off regularly.
Christ this isn't even about romance, it will literally interfere with your day to day life if you don't get sexual release.
It's to the point where your body will just do it unconsciously through raw imagination via a wet dream if you don't have any manual release consciously.
Why the fuck do girls think they get male sexuality in terms of living with it.
c9cbda No.166184
I'M GOING TO GO WATCH PORN AND NOBODY CAN STOP ME!
12e616 No.166214
>>166184
I'll do you one better. I'm going to make porn, and no one can stop us. First I need to get some Halloween masks.
God I love the internet.
c04a85 No.166266
>>158183
Why do you fucking retards keep trying to imply that I'm blaming porn for all evil in the world? All I'm saying is that it's bad for a relationship and I don't want my bf to watch it. Why are men so buttfucking crazy aggressive about defending porn to the point of illogical stupidity? Porn make men less attracted to women they are in relationships with and it also make sex less enjoyable. It's bad for long lasting relationships and can give men disgusting/violent sexual fetishes.
You faggots are getting so, so, so fucking angry about me forbidding my boyfriend to watch it. It's like men can not function without porn and depriving them of it is unspeakable abuse.
c04a85 No.166269
>>158278
I broke up with him long ago, I have a new bf now and he doesn't watch it. It was the old boyfriend I was talking about.
>>158370
/cow/ has known about us for fucking ages. I don't know why they're suddenly pretending to have just discovered us.
12e616 No.166288
>>166269
Probably because he jacks it to menudo, or some adult diaper baby shit stories. Or maybe he's just a run of the mill panty sniffer.
Is he allowed to talk to other girls?
12e616 No.166289
>>166266
You were in the reserve. We keep one so we don't resort to board cannibalism. Learned that lesson. Let's us be at ease.
12e616 No.166291
>>166266
You don't need porn to develop fetishes. An actual fetish by definition is something you can't get off without and usually develops a bit earlier than your late teens to early 20's. You mean kink. What's more you can't seem to grasp causation vs correlation. If a guy jacks it to some strange stuff, the wiring was probably already there. Otherwise you could turn someone gay or straight with porn. Which is just retarded.
This whole arguement has been retarded. Why are you so obsessed with porn? I personally hate romance novels, but you don't see me trying to ban them. I don't threaten to dump my girlfriend for reading twilight while I'm reading do androids dream of electric sheep or whatever the book of the day is. Today it was naked lunch for me and she was reading the Taking of Sleeping Beauty or some other Ann Rice trash.
The problem with your entire arguement is that it's based on junk science and feels. You have relationship issues. You need to see a shrink.
e3e8e7 No.166298
>>166266
>All I'm saying is that it's bad for a relationship
>It's bad for long lasting relationships
wew, [citation needed] :^)
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sm2.58/full
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sm2.70/full
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/233887342_Erotica_Viewing_Effects_on_Intimate_Relationships_and_SelfPartner_Evaluations
seriously though, you've never watched pornography with your partner? even for a laugh? I feel bad now.
>and can give men disgusting/violent sexual fetishes.
yeah and so can various experiences in anyone's upbringing or throughout their lives: you don't need erotic material for that.
>so fucking angry about me forbidding my boyfriend to watch it.
no one's angry, you're free to keep him on a leash however you want.
however, what was at issue earlier in the thread was a /cgi/ cap, which was filled with probable psychological abusers.
maybe it hit a little too close to home, and you went on the defense out of guilt?
perhaps because you're a tad too controlling and borderline psychologically abuse your partner? :^)
>men can not function without porn
but that's not really the argument. if you don't have a partner, men or woman, you fucking need sexual release to function normally.
you need to clean out the tubes occasionally at a bare minimum. in the case of having a sexual partner, I suggest reading >>159661
sometimes I just want to fucking release without worrying about getting you off. and I want to do it quickly, with an aid.
so I go jerk off. it's pretty simple.
alleging that pornography is bad for relationships, or that it gives anyone (men or women) "disgusting/violent fetishes" lays bare your preconceived notion. you have zero evidence to back these assertions up.
and here's the kicker: over-consumption of pornography may be an indicator of a bad relationship, but that doesn't suggest that it's the cause, especially in the general case. simply a symptom. you're free to present evidence suggesting otherwise.
06965c No.166502
>>166266
Nah nigga. Its yo stanky ass pussy thats stopping your boy from popping a stiffy. No amount of cartwheel midget tranny acrobat porn is going to stop men from being attracted to beautiful women.
28d045 No.166522
>>166502
Midget acrobat porn? I really want to see this. Please tell me it involves clown makeup and props.
327781 No.177213
Quick story. I met an ugly blue haired girl on the bus while on her phone. I was planning to go pizza face tonight, till I saw what was on her phone.
It was wizardchan. Something about different breeds of norms, as if they were pokemon.
My sausage went soft and I never did pickups on the bus again.
9b38fe No.194645
I watch porn with my boyfriend and we are doing alright. A decade and counting. Haven't married yet due to financial reasons and personal mental reasons as in trying to let go of baggage since we both came from fucked up backgrounds but taking it slowly.
We don't have vaginal sex most of the time and just masturbate each other off.
69e4af No.194656
>>151169
So far they're one of the least retarded female communities I've seen online. I mean the fact that they're an imageboard and not an attention-whoring social media site puts them ahead of most of the other women on the internet. Which is saying a lot seeing how most girls spend their time online
Like I said in >>158002 the combination of tumblrisms with racism is really rather bizarre.
It actually kinda makes sense, if you don't want to get raped, stay out of the hood
>>162349
Ever been on a tour of Pompeii? It's full of porn murals
58acf2 No.194754
>>165081
That's probably a pretty accurate description of his sex life
e2319a No.194893
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>165081
Is this Leigh Alexander? https://archive.is/Ae6Gs#selection-3173.0-3187.140
>>164019
I'm not picky, I'll fuck'em all to DEATH
>>162313 Mermaid's Scar, here! Masato is DA MAN!
9b38fe No.195273
>>158420
You can easily rewrite all of this with addiction to substances.
22649b No.195424
Fuck, I just spent 3 hours reading this thread.
Conclusion reached: maybe it's not so bad that I'm a loser. This whole relationship thing sounds like hard work.
805f6f No.195426
>>151081
I laugh, but then I'm sort of filled with a deep depression at the disintegration of western society
805f6f No.195428
>>161486
Thanks for reminding me I need to masturbate btw, you authoritarian /pol/ack faggot
e769f1 No.195429
File: 1453275600827.png (111.35 KB, 2730x282, 455:47, Screen Shot 2016-01-20 at ….png)

>>151081
This mentality is so fukcing stupid. As if things would all be magically better if more women were ruling shit.
713083 No.195494
>>160485
>>160813
>>160249
As always, revyfag comes back for some more humiliation. Wanna get doxed again, bitchboy? Are you gonna make a new Steam account to keep roleplaying? Or are you too busy dealing with being a virgin unemployed lonely transfag? So many questions, so little time!
1b515d No.195588
Well, at least they hate tumblr too: https://lolcow.farm/b/res/60529.html
03bc20 No.195681
>>151081
I swear to god my half sister has the same fucking story.
03bc20 No.195682
>>195681
minus the subway bits
45d8a0 No.196990
>>195429
Well she has the wrong idea of what MRA is, but at least she doesnt drinks the feminazi koolaid about not teaching women how to avoid rape
45d8a0 No.196992
>>162379
Is that fucking wil wheaton?
e7ddde No.196998
We should merge this with the wizardchan thread and link them both here. Can you imagine the internet slap fight?
774a00 No.197395
>>158172
Replacement for children.
13fbfc No.197396
>>195424
It's a lot easier when everyone involved is not a hilariously broken person with no idea how a human being is supposed to function
e7ddde No.197409
>>197396
So you're saying it's a lot easier in fiction? Everyone I know is broken in some way. The trick is to roll with it, if possible. I mean in some cases you have to abandon ship but usually you just eat it knowing she's doing the same for you.
After a few years every relationship is more about convenience than lust or "love". You love your children, but you just put up with your wife because she knows where all the bodies are buried.
dc1ce3 No.198031
>>160900
> the more porn you watch the more extreme the cocks needs to become
And the wordfilter scores again
9ea94f No.198172
>>157694
Kill yourself you fucking whore.
69e4af No.198173
>>157694
Then post swastikas until they leave
9ea94f No.198174
>>160657
You change your id's so much, nofap. Tell me again how all the girls want you and they can't keep themselves off of your rod because you don't think about your penis.
9ea94f No.198175
>>160978
Changing id's again! Why do you think it's so bad to fap? Are you from /pol/?
9ea94f No.198177
9ea94f No.198178
>>197409
And that's why the entire thing should have just been killed off as to spare us the indignity of it all. The entirety of life is worthless and all things must die.
Ashes and Echoes
9ea94f No.198180
>>158148
Did this meme come into play recently? Or has it always been imageboard culture to assume that some random ass poster is someone you know from real life.
012bfc No.198183
>>198178
Jesus Christ, I'd hate to meet the bitch who fucked you over.
9ea94f No.198184
>>160904
We call that POZ.
9ea94f No.198185
>>198183
Don't lie! We all know that everyone who's ever posted on an imageboard is the worst of all people; who hates every single other poster so hard that their life would end if it had any effort behind it at all!
But, you have already met the whore who ruined my life…
Her name is Fate.
9ea94f No.198189
>>198187
It means that they are ruined sluts who should be thrown in the oven.
012bfc No.198190
>>198185
Is that her stage name at the fuzzy clam?
012bfc No.198191
>>198189
This isn't the male wizardchan thread.
9ea94f No.198195
>>198190
>>198191
Nope; but it is a shitposting thread. Like every other thread on your board.
012bfc No.198197
>>198195
Oh. You really should do something about that sand in your vagina. Or is it dust mites?
9ea94f No.198200
>>198197
Wrong poster there, Ser. I'm not bitching about men; I'm bitching about women being alllowed out of the house!
And I find your islachild abuserhobia triggering!
e7ddde No.198203
>>198200
Isla child? Huh. River child abuse phobia? That's highly specific. Omg. Susan Smith nightmares. How did you know? Ever since that episode of supernatural.
e7ddde No.198204
>>198203
I'd have gone with the killing, but that was a teenager. Probably what you were referring to though, in retrospect.
efd804 No.198206
>>162379
Instead? You sir have no imagination.
Now you're picturing it. My girlfriend once tried to get one of those vibrating cuff ring thingies on me, but it literally wouldn't fit. It was excruciating. Never order that stuff from Japan. I heard one of her friends tried proposing that way with a large gold ring. Didn't work out. Wound up in the ER getting it cut off. I hear they keep a special saw just for that at hospitals. Someone should make an psa about it.
e7ddde No.198207
>>198204
Wait. Isla in Danish means island right? As opposed to the celtic for the waters edge. Is that a season 2 thing, cause I'm way behind. No spoilers. That's such a hard language that I have to watch it a couple times go really get it. Dyslexic, subtitles are the vein of my existence and the American remakes are just about never as good. I mean a fist full of dollars was pretty good as was the departed, but ordinarily we basically rape the works to death.
Evil wizards. Next you're going to ruin the making of a murder for me or paradise lost.
9ea94f No.198208
>>198200
damn! That's a funny wordbutter right there!
9ea94f No.198209
>>198207
Supernatural is a shit show that is only liked by tumblrinas because they want gaycest.
fae64e No.198257
>>198206
>you sir
>my girlfriend
>ordering from japan
where do you obnoxious dipshits even come from? get the fuck off my board
b178be No.198267
>>198257
She's a weeb. Problem?
5027fe No.198321
>>160978
Most of that shit looks like paranoia to me, but the metrosexual magazines and TV heroes' greatest skill and power being snark is spot on and needs to stop.