>>170476
>After scrolling down a bit, however, it doesn't seem so bad. They basically just ask questions (of which only a few is leading), and provide some quotes for discussion.
Actually, they seem to attach articles to everything, so maybe they are quite stupid or arrogant. I haven't checked them.
>>169936
>>169950
Still don't see why they're /cow/-worthy, though (I assume that's what you ment by "needs to be julayed"). If I'm wrong, stop arguing and make a thread.