/cow/ - Lolcows (NO MOLAY)

I remember her, she's one massive fedora (then again is she faking her atheism for jewtube gold?) with a hardon for Dawkins, and I wondered if her and her neckbeard fanboys could be julayed. Maybe a teamup with /christian/ is in order?

>>172507

>Sargon of Acuck

>Sargon of Cuck

Look who shows up to white knight for her.

>>172512

First off, she does have a ED stubble. Not a full page, but it's under AA's. Second, If someone can make a thread on /christian/ and link to here, I think we CAN Julayy her. She doesn't block tweets, against her, so let's get things started.

This is the same annoying cunt that video taped her grandfather and made a "Wow, look how backwards he is and how progressive I am!" video mocking him, isn't it?

She's stupid and annoying, but I don't know if that equals cow. I mean, unfortunately that describes damn near every atheist on youtube.

Actually, let me rephrase that, that basically describes everyone on youtube whose entire identity is built around being an atheist. There are a ton of atheists on there who are just fine because it isn't the entire basis of their persona. I'm an atheist myself, but god do these people embarrass me by association.

>The fact is, if a Christian had done the same thing, we'd see Gamergate's E-Celebs and Fedora's calling him or her out.

I highly doubt that. First off, this cunt has never said anything about GamerGate as far as I know, and even GG's e-celebs have a tendency to call out other people as fuckups. MundaneMatt, KingofPol, Ralph, etc have been thoroughly criticized.

I don't agree with Sargon on everything, but he doesn't strike me as *that* kind of atheist.

>>172533

Her white knights can certainly become cows if she can't.

>militant atheists

*tips banana into anus*

>>172507

>The only atheist to comment on it was Adblock Matt

Not true. The guy in >>172516 is white knighting her against Atheism-is-Unstoppable. I searched and found his video (embedded). In that video, he references two other videos, which found the plagerism before he did. They were attached in the lowbar:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsdwTo1Xk80 (by an atheist, judging by the channel name)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPK15-71kbQ (by an atheist, judging by the video titles and related channels)

>>172533

https://youtu.be/EiuPbBqre6U?t=1m11s

Video this guy was referring to. But no. She's an idiot and narcissist much like Nyanners. But she isn't a lolcow. I could be wrong though.

>>172553

I also found his response to >>172516, which was hillarious. Who is Casiodarkmoon 12, anyways? Is he a lolcow?

>>172507

>Her youtube atheist channel friends like Banana Dipper, Sargon of Acuck, and Armored Skeptic, are all silent.

But that's wrong. TJ(banana dipper) had her on his podcast and he chewed her out.

I was always disappointed by her, she never brings up any new talking points and tends to regurgitate things other people say. This thread is interesting so far.

>>172507

Here is a video where she makes appeals to emotion to support Bruce Jenner.

>"The fact is, if a Christian had done the same thing, we'd see Gamergate's E-Celebs and Fedora's calling him or her out."

>Buthurt Kikeworshipper detected

Perhaps some atheists would point it out, but they bloody well wouldn't do it on /cow/. We're not moralfags, and we don't care if she acted like a cunt. Here's the bottom line, OP: What evidence is there that she can produce cocks?

>>172557

>>172559

I feel bad about not pointing out I didn't mean to seem like two people: I gave a partial answer to my own question because I looked at the comment section after posting >>172559.

>>172559

>He certainly seems to take commet sections very seriously

Athiesm is Unstoppable does too. He regularly deletes dissenting views and blocks people, no matter how civil they are.

>>172574

Yep, I know. Athiesm is Unstoppable is funny (especially his videos about things like anti-white race baiters and Islam apologists, religion itself as a topic is a bit been-there-done-that to me) and I would really like his videos if he wasn't such an intellectually cowardly, arrogant, oversocialised twat.

He just bans people, though. There are no cocks in that. The comment section I posted was proof that Casiodarkmoon 12 actually takes time to react and whine about comments he doesn't like. I like how this admitted paedophile has himself with a little girl clinging around his neck as his profile picture.

>>172533

Sargon as *that* kind of atheist

True, you'd even think the man religious by the way he talks. I've only known him once to sperg about his atheism.

This board has become mini /pol/

>>172603

Yeah.

>>172563

>goes on about LOGIC AND REASON

>gets all emotional when liberal causes such as tranny rights and MUH ISLAMOPHOBIA come up, rejecting their values despite trannies being a contradiction of their views, and Islam being Islam

The modern atheist is a strange creature

>>172561

That would kind of just make him a hypocrite since his entire youtube "career" has been marked with scamming money shamelessly out of his viewers, repeatedly, and his two attempts to start his own youtube both being "I want money to hose other people's cocks so I can make money off their cocks."

>>172561

can you post video of this? it's not often I see that fat twat do much of anything that's morally in the right

>>172557

>>>172557

>>Who is Casiodarkmoon 12, anyways? Is he a lolcow?

>He is more a pedophile rapist than a /cow/. Here is his ED page.

>https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Robert_casio

>He has an active thread on /cow/ as well, way down there somewhere. He never does anything funny though. He is just a fat worthless white trash pedo.

>>172634

Is that the guy who defended Nick Bate, and there's that picture of him eating a piece of old pizza in a rotted out bathtub naked, and it turned out he was making the threads about himself…?

>>172553

>>172557

I just started watching AIU & other than his liberal ban-hammering, dude seems pretty based

also fuck TAA for strawmanning him

you can't come up with an actual argument against him, so you just jump on the fucking racist card. libtards are all the same

>>172637

>also fuck TAA for strawmanning him

TJ never strawmanned him

>you can't come up with an actual argument against him, so you just jump on the fucking racist card.

but thats not what happened. TJ has invited AIU on his show to debate him or explain his position numerous times and AIU always just responds with insults.

>>172642

>TJ never strawmanned him

yeah, he did. he got into an argument that had nothing to do with him & tried dismissing it by calling AIU racist. that's the same as someone trying to dismiss an argument by calling someone else a misogynist, or is that not something you're familiar with?

>TJ has invited AIU on his show to debate him or explain his position numerous times and AIU always just responds with insults

you know what, I actually agree with not going on the show, not the insult parts, but that's beside the point. TJ is an annoying cunt & I wouldn't want to spend 5 minutes in a skype chat with him, much less the 2+ fucking hours that usually encompasses the show

honestly speaking, I don't give a shit about Jaclyn. from what I've seen, she's not really entertaining & doesn't come up with interesting or new arguments

I think the reason she's as popular as she currently is is because she's hot, but I could be wrong. my only real exposure to her is from her videos posted on TAA's channel or DP I just recently got too annoyed with DP to keep watching & I'm almost there with banana boy

call me out for not actually going to her channel if you will, I just think that if she can't give an excellent & memorable performance on a channel that's bigger than hers in every way, then she's really not worth watching

>>172660

>he got into an argument that had nothing to do with him

He commented on his response to Jaclyn on his podcast, that's it.

>& tried dismissing it by calling AIU racist

but that's not what happened.

> that's the same as someone trying to dismiss an argument by calling someone else a misogynist

but TJ didnt just call him racist, he called him racist after responding to everything else AIU said. Why would TJ invite him on the show to defend himself or explain his position if he wants to just dismiss him as a racist?

>you know what, I actually agree with not going on the show

Why? AIU had an opportunity to actually explain himself or argue with TJ 'face to face'. And TJ and his lackeys have shown that they are capable of being civil and actually talking with people.

>>172665

>I think the reason she's as popular as she currently is is because she's hot

Really? Hot? Because in that icon for one of her videos above, she's not looking a whole lot different than Bruce Jenner to me.

>>172711

TJ is impossible to take seriously besides everything else, because he constantly calls people racist like that's an argument. That's not an argument. You can call someone an asshole, but it doesn't make any of their arguments wrong. It's just attaching a label, and "racist" is TJ's go-to insult. Every damn video I've seen of him on the subject he goes out of his way to be ignorant to justify calling someone racist or decrying racist activity.

I saw one where he was whining "You know, I see all these videos with black people doing stupid things… and the comments are all like 'stupid niggers' and I never see that ever in videos of white people!" I'm like, you fucking piece of shit, which videos are you watching? Every video with a fat white person, a white person falling or an accident involving white people and a gun gets the same bigoted remarks about white people, Americans and the South. He should be intimately aware of that last one given his own painfully retarded hateboner for Texas.

I remember seeing some painfully childish "ownage" video he did where his entire counter "argument" to the guy boiled down to talking with a southern accent -which the guy didn't have- claiming that the guy just "didn't l ike them niggers" when race was never discussed in the original videos and then called him a homophobe by jacking off an imaginary shotgun repeatedly.

TJ can't argue worth shit and he's possibly the scummiest fuck on youtube.

>>172734

>>172734

>TJ is impossible to take seriously besides everything else, because he constantly calls people racist like that's an argument. That's not an argument. You can call someone an asshole, but it doesn't make any of their arguments wrong. It's just attaching a label, and "racist" is TJ's go-to insult. Every damn video I've seen of him on the subject he goes out of his way to be ignorant to justify calling someone racist or decrying racist activity.

I dont deny that he calls racist people racist but I dont get where this whole 'he's uses the word as an argument' thing comes from.

>I saw one where he was whining "You know, I see all these videos with black people doing stupid things… and the comments are all like 'stupid niggers' and I never see that ever in videos of white people!"

But that's true. Go to any video of a black person doing something stupid or bad and the comment section will usually be full of people targeting the person's race but if it's a video of a white person doing something stupid or bad 99% of the comments will say something along the lines of 'lol what a dumbass' and if you make a joke about white you'll get three kind of replies. 'Why are you bringing race into this, dont you know you're dividing us!?', 'well niggers do XYZ', and 'lol'. A video doesnt even have to have a black person in it for there to be racist comment(see video for example).

>Every video with a fat white person, a white person falling or an accident involving white people and a gun gets the same bigoted remarks about white people, Americans and the South

I dont agree, most of the time there are little to no bigoted comments about white people. You do have europeans that go on and talk shit about americans and americans that go on to talk shit about rednecks and southerners(these are economic insults, not racial insults).

>I remember seeing some painfully childish "ownage" video he did where his entire counter "argument" to the guy boiled down to talking with a southern accent -which the guy didn't have- claiming that the guy just "didn't l ike them niggers" when race was never discussed in the original videos and then called him a homophobe by jacking off an imaginary shotgun repeatedly.

Is this on TJ's main channel? What he reacting to the video of that thug ex C.O. that threatened the BLM people and the black panthers? If that's the video your referring to then race was definitely a factor in that video(which is obvious with the frequent use of the word 'thug' and trying to blame a cop's death on BLM), and it's dishonest to pretend that it wasn't, hell he even said in the video "Dont ever let a black panther or any black group come to yo town and march in that town and get done and be able to get in their vehicle and leave'

>>172734

>easy

sorry, my bad. I just got home from class & my brain was on auto-pilot until I got a cup of coffee in. just put that correction in where it says hot

she's like madonna. not really attractive or talented, but more than willing to show off their body to try and advance their career

>>172747

>I dont get where this whole 'he uses the word as an argument' thing comes from

idk for most of it either, but the AIU thing was where i caught onto it

>go to any video of a black person doing something stupid or bad and the comment section will usually be full of people targeting the person's race

this is the internet, mother fucker. where have you been? if you go onto one titled "Walmart fatties" and see the phrase "fatass" appear over & over in the comments, are you going to call it "weightist"? if you see one of a flaming, lisping, limp wristed douchebag talking about his cosmetics, will you call the comments homophobic when you eventually see the word "Faggot" come up?

given any kind of anonymity, people can and will act like fucks to eachother for the lulziness of it all

how long have you been on a chan without learning any of this? the only people that take this seriously are the ones that should be called nigger

>>172734

another thing. I'm not sure if you remember the Broken Arrow fa,ily killing that happened during the summer but before the mug shots were released and the headlines read 'Manhunt for two teens suspected of murdering family' you had many whites in the comments saying things like 'race wasnt mentioned, it was dindus' and 'fucking niggers'. And then when the two teens were arrested and the mug shots were released the comment sections were empty aside from a few generic 'oh that's horrible!' comments.

look at this video for an example

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO9A-yn0Ob4

Notice the lack of racial comments? Everyone is just calling the kid beating up the blind kid a "piece of shit" and other insults of that nature.

the same goes for this video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDifkMzSLuw

Now compare the comment sections of those two videos to this one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwzOk0qvLbA

Notice the change in tone and language?

Also the guy in the video says 'you black bastards' and has to catch himself a few times so he wont say nigger. There's also a video of him 'confronting' the black panthers and in it he says 'do any of my family like black?' in response to the BP saying that he(the texan) hates them(the panthers) because his daughter prefers black men. He also calls Sandra Bland of all people a "thug" even though he did thug shit like beating up inmates.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JviDGJ1hmbI

>>172747

>I dont deny that he calls racist people racist

He calls ANYONE who disagrees with him racist. It's pointless to point out. Imagine if every time someone argued with TJ they pointed out that he was morbidly obese and had a tiny dick. Now, it's true that TJ is morbidly obese and has a tiny dick, but does the fact that TJ is morbidly obese and has a tiny dick effect his argument? No, TJ's arguments are stupid for reasons completely unrelated to him being morbidly obese and having a tiny dick.

TJ is morbidly obese and has a tiny dick.

Now what I just did there? That's what TJ is doing every time he flails around like a retard and calls someone a racist. It adds nothing to his argument and is a pointless personal attack demonstrating his lack of a real argument. Also he's morbidly obese and has a tiny dick.

>But that's true.

You have to go looking for it.

>if you make a joke about white you'll get three kind of replies.

Your first line admits it happens, and your proof that it doesn't is that… people don't like it? That's dumb.

>talk shit about rednecks and southerners(these are economic insults, not racial insults).

Redneck is a racial slur, and we all know who TJ is trying to mock when he puts on a southern accent. He's a cuck bigot, pure and simple.

>Is this on TJ's main channel? What he reacting to the video of that thug ex C.O. that threatened the BLM people and the black panthers? If that's the video your referring to then race was definitely a factor in that video(which is obvious with the frequent use of the word 'thug' and trying to blame a cop's death on BLM), and it's dishonest to pretend that it wasn't,

No, I haven't seen that video, but thanks for demonstrating how utterly worthless TJ is in that his every fucking argument is just calling the other person a racist. I've never seen that video (but I note you declare 'thug' to be racist, but not redneck and southerners, hypocrital much?)

The video I'm referring to had some fat kid in I think a hoodie outlining his political beliefs in his bedroom or something. It ends with TJ insulting the kid for being fat and declaring something like "I know I'm fat, but you're like three of me!" in supreme lack of self-awareness, and then leans into the camera and declares that everyone agrees with him and is laughing at the kid. It's pathetic. He always argues like an internet tough guy.

>>172756

"Cheeseburger Josh": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXHV_pscgkI

>haha whitetrash mothafucka!!!

>roflmfao well this should all teach us a valuable lesson: never keep food away from a fat cow. If I were in there I would scream "For the love of god, someone give this fat-ass a cheeseburger or anything edible already before he shoots up the place." White trash!

>don't mess with a whiteys cheeseburger

>Damn white people are funny. :D

>cheeseburgers: the white man's fried chicken

>is that for real? lmao yeah white folk are pretty funny–especially those white crackers. jesus give the boy a cheese burger.

This Vice video about guns has an overwhelmingly positive response, but the few negative comments? "Why aren't there any black people here? Buncha white racists!" "You stupid Americans with your white murder machines!" and so on. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCppmoZiXUY

I could keep going.

>>172753

>this is the internet, mother fucker. where have you been? if you go onto one titled "Walmart fatties" and see the phrase "fatass" appear over & over in the comments, are you going to call it "weightist"?

Not really the same thing. I know not to go to white nationalist/anti-black youtube channels and use their comment section as an example, I know not to go to videos titled savage nigger does X' and use that for an example. I'm talking about regular news stories.

>given any kind of anonymity, people can and will act like fucks to eachother for the lulziness of it all

sure, but when it comes to blacks the reaction is much more than just "acting like fucks for the lulz".

>>172758

>He calls ANYONE who disagrees with him racist

Lol, no he doesnt. Come on now, you dont have to like TJ but let's not start making things up about people.

Fine how about this. Post a few videos of TJ calling people racist as an argument and not as an insult.

>You have to go looking for it.

Not really, it's usually just something you come across.

>Your first line admits it happens, and your proof that it doesn't is that… people don't like it? That's dumb.

Sure, I wouldn't claim that it doesnt happen, but it doesn't happen NEARLY(not even close) as often as white racist comments towards blacks for little things.

>Redneck is a racial slur

In what universe? It is based on regional and economic differences, not on skin color; and since it originated by Whites, it's a self-parody. When a white guy from the north says 'haha rednecks are stupid' he is talking about whites that live under certain conditions, not the white race as a whole.

>and we all know who TJ is trying to mock when he puts on a southern accent

Dumb Southerners.

>(but I note you declare 'thug' to be racist, but not redneck and southerners, hypocrital much?)

Because they're different things. Thug=black person that does or thinks something i don't like. Whites called Richard Sherman a thug, for what, for yelling next to a white woman after a high stakes football game. You had whites calling Marshawn Lynch a thug, for what, for not answering interview questions. Whites(not the media just normal everyday whites) called the news cast shooter a thug even though he had done things right for most of his life. I dont mind the word when it's used properly but there are some cases where it's clearly meant to be a substitute for the word 'nigger'.

>The video I'm referring to had some fat kid in I think a hoodie outlining his political beliefs in his bedroom or something. It ends with TJ insulting the kid for being fat and declaring something like "I know I'm fat, but you're like three of me!" in supreme lack of self-awareness, and then leans into the camera and declares that everyone agrees with him and is laughing at the kid. It's pathetic. He always argues like an internet tough guy.

Oh okay, i havent seen that video.

>>172759

try to find a video where the anti-white comments are the top comments. Because i can easily respond to that with this where there are a few comments being racist towards blacks that arent top comments. Also the comment about there not being any blacks isnt a racist comment and was left by what appears to be an indian. Couldnt find the comment about the "stupid americans with your white murder machines". Again please, try to find a video where most of the comments and a few of the top comments are racist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaMylwohL14

wh

>>172764

>In what universe? It is based on regional and economic differences, not on skin color; and since it originated by Whites, it's a self-parody. When a white guy from the north says 'haha rednecks are stupid' he is talking about whites that live under certain conditions, not the white race as a whole.

It refers to the change in color that a white person gets from working in the sun all day. It's specifically, directly about race.

And your argument that it "doesn't refer to the race as a whole" could be used just as easily for nigger, beaner, wetback, etc. "Wetback isn't racist because I know Mexicans who say it, and it specifically refers to illegals who swam across." It's a racist term man, deal with it.

>Dumb Southerners.

Because he's a self-hating cuck.

>Because they're different things. Thug=black person that does or thinks something i don't like.

So you're asserting every single black person is a thug? Face it, you basically just declared yourself a racist or demonstrated why your entire argument is hypocritical bullshit.

>try to find a video where the anti-white comments are the top comments.

Moving goal posts. Now you're trying to assert the sentiment has to be popular. It's either been removed or simply been bumped down in circulation -and I'm unwilling to spend hours going through over 15,000 comments to find it- but the top comment on this video used to be an Indian woman fantically screaming "White people are all so stupid, you think we all wear turbans?! Hahaha, fuck you!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTIIMJ9tUc8

Just search up "dumb blonde" "white people" "white guy road rage" or anything gun related for other examples.

>>172764

Thing is that

>1) anti-white race baiting is common in mainstream liberal media

>2) the mainstream left (like any group large enough to have the privilege of being able to drown out contrarian opinions) avoids difficult-to-control fora such as comment fields and chans like the plague

and

>3) Blacks are more likely to be thugs, and to attack whites

>I haven't seen anti-white comment fields

Really? You haven't been looking very hard.

>Racist

No one cares if something is racist. "Racist" means the same thing as "heretic", "islamophobe", "sexist", "counter revolutionary", etc. — it means

>"What you said disagrees with my dogma, and because I can't think for myself I'm going to attach a scary-sounding label instead of responding." If person A says to person B "according to my dogma and religion you are a heretic", that reflects poorly on person A, not person B — the same is true for "racist".

>Because they're different things. Thug=black person that does or thinks something i don't like

Such nonsense. The thing is that thugs are vastly overrepresented among blacks.

>>172767

>It refers to the change in color that a white person gets from working in the sun all day. It's specifically, directly about race.

Also about slavery, as it refered to the white field workers who were out working in the sun all day.

>Because they're different things. Thug=black person that does or thinks something i don't like

I'm suprised that the Jaclyn Glenn thread of all threads is the new racial politics containment thread.

>>172764

Top comments doesn't work like it used to, but just loading up the comments section (because I remember this video, and it used to be FLOODED with anti-white comments) there's still a ton of "stupid americans" "stupid rednecks" etc. type remarks.

So much hate over a couple guys slapping a silly-looking gun together. Get to the comment string by Branko Dimitrijevic, but beyond that:

>fucking Americans …

>You're right i'm sorry. I meant Fucking rednecks.

>Dumb rednecks..all that crap on it would just not do in a real life incident..keep it light and simple

>I think you've had more then youre fair share of Moonshine "buddy" - that kind of abstract thought may have worked in the 1980s but this is the 21st sentury you dumb redneck.

>Wny do that ,when you can waste money on Canadian whiskey,moonshine and dumb ass blond whores.

>Rednecks, taking Tacticool to the next level.

>american are stupid love guns and violence !

>stupid fucking mericans. This is why children and adults are shot every year in your stupid country. Take a leaf out of the uk's book, gun crime is almost non-existent and all you can own is a simple 12-gauge. You guys work in a shop where you can make these guns readily available to any merican psycho who wants to kill a child.

>and all american get a boner…

>Americans… PATHETIC

>It's just an opinion and most Americans don't like opinions.

>don't generalize these hicks with americans.

>Americans are retarded

>fucking american crazy of shit

It's like they wanted to make a tacticool gun for shits and giggles, but instead they produced a Europoor tear factory.

Last comment for the night~

>>172767

>It's specifically, directly about race.

No, it's not, no matter how badly you want it to be it's not. As I've already explained to you, it's a class/regional insult made by whites.

>>172767

>And your argument that it "doesn't refer to the race as a whole" could be used just as easily for nigger, beaner, wetback, etc

NOt really, considering words like "nigger" were used to dehumanize a whole race of people. I dont know enough about the history of the words beaner and wetback to comment on them.

>Wetback isn't racist because I know Mexicans who say it, and it specifically refers to illegals who swam across

That's not at all what I said. What I said was more like 'Redneck isnt racist because it was made by whites to make fun of other whites living under different conditions'.

I'd say that a black person that goes around calling other black people things like shines, niggers, chimps, and dindus is a racist.

>So you're asserting every single black person is a thug?

No. I was defining the word thug by the way many white people use it now. As I said before, I would have no problem if it was used for the right people(career criminals) and consistently.

>Moving goal posts.

How so? Please, re-read this post

>>172747

where is said

>Go to any video of a black person doing something stupid or bad and the comment section will usually be full of people targeting the person's race

> full of people targeting the person's race

>full

Also I forgot to add 'or the majority of the comment section' after "try to find a video where the anti-white comments are the top comments".

>Now you're trying to assert the sentiment has to be popular

Sure.

>Just search up "dumb blonde" "white people" "white guy road rage" or anything gun related for other examples.

Just looked at the first few videos that pop up when you search 'dumb blonde' and Im not finding any racist comments, hell, im not even seeing any negative comments about blondes. Though unsurprisingly there are a few comments left by euros talking about how dumb americans are.

>>172773

>using a black nationalist video as proof

I can just as easily pull up one of the many anti-black/white nationalists videos and have you look at their comment section. Come on now.

>I haven't seen anti-white comment fields

I dont recall saying that

>Such nonsense. The thing is that thugs are vastly overrepresented among blacks.

That depends on your definition of "thug". If we're talking about criminals, then no, the crime data does not support that statement.

>inb4 but blacks are X percent of the population and commit Y percent of the crimes

this says nothing about what percentage of the black population are criminal.

>Also about slavery, as it refered to the white field workers who were out working in the sun all day.

Sorry, there were no white slaves in the colonies. There were indentured servants but the term 'redneck' was born some time after indentured servants stopped coming to america in large numbers. What's next, 'the first slave owner was black'?

http://www.academia.edu/9475964/The_Myth_of_Irish_Slaves_in_the_Colonies

>>172776

I'm not sure where you're getting this idea that comments like 'stupid americans' are anti-white but whatever(especially since many of those kind of comments are left by Europeans or Canadians and usually have no hatred or ill will behind them).

>>172764

>I'm talking about regular news stories

that was a response to

>Go to any video of a black person doing something stupid or bad

the key word being any

>but when it comes to blacks, the reaction is more than just "acting like fucks for the lulz"

which is why it's done so much. people treat this shit too seriously

I for one think the world will be a better place when we all learn to just call eachother a nigger, black or white

>>172711

>why? AIU had an opportunity to actually explain himself or argue with TJ 'face to face'. And TJ and his lackeys have shown that they are capable of being civil and actually talking with people

not what I said. I'm sorry that I only just started getting around to this, but here's my official response. dude shouldn't have to defend himself being called racist on TJ's show, when the dude's proof of him being racist is flimsy at best & strawmanned at worst

if you actually watched his videos in response to DP, dude responds & explains himself

lastly, it's like I said, TJ is an annoying, obnoxious bitch. I'm sure he can behave himself for an episode, maybe, but that doesn't change the fact that he's still annoying & obnoxious & that's why many people hesitate to even associate with him

>>172781

>No, it's not, no matter how badly you want it to be it's not.

You're not making an argument, you're just saying "It's not it's not it's not!" it specifically refers to the color of your skin. You're simply wrong here, deal with it.

>considering words like "nigger" were used to dehumanize a whole race of people

Or just certain members of that race?

>That's not at all what I said. What I said was more like 'Redneck isnt racist because it was made by whites to make fun of other whites living under different conditions'.

You're trying to specify that "whites came up with it" which you can't really prove and somehow that exempts it from being racist. Calling black people "ashy" for example is definitely an idea that exists strictly within the black community, as well as saying they have "nappy hair" and "oreo". By your logic, none of these are racist statements. Please, stop being a complete retard.

>What's next, 'the first slave owner was black'?

Well, when you consider the slaves were purchased *from* Africans… and if you believe Egyptians were black and consider *they* owned slaves… Yeah, you're a fucking idiot completely ignorant of the topic you're discussing.

>there's no ill-will behind calling someone stupid based on the country they're from

It totally isn't racist to call someone a "stupid mexican" then, right?

>>172507

I saw her respond to the plagiarism thing on DP, and she basically admitted that she fucked up. Whether that's due to pressure or her actually catching herself is up to interpretation.

I've tried watching her before, but there's this weird disconnect I have when I watch her because I don't feel like she's genuine. It's a weird feeling I can't describe, but she feels like a robot produced to provide a feminine perspective on Atheism. Basically, if you can think of a liberal talking point, 9 times outta 10 she'll probably parrot that or has parroted it. I think, even on some level, she has to acknowledge that part of her popularity has to be due to her being a woman and her aggressively promoting herself to big name atheists. I'm not saying that's 100% why she's popular, because if one thing's for certain, people LOVE hearing their opinions be repeated to them (just like this board!), but I'm sure there are dozens of other female, liberal atheists who say exactly what she says with half her popularity simply because they don't have the connections or desire to actually be famous.

Regardless, that's just some fag's shitty analysis of her popularity. I'm sure like a lot of people outside of the internet, she's probably a decent person. Hell, she doesn't feel AS MUCH of a tool as Shoe0nHead, a woman I legitimately cannot understand why she's popular.

As for the AiU stuff, he seems like a massive asshole. Regardless of his positions on race relations and shit, he just seems like a faggot that wants a hugbox. That said, all my views have been slanted since I've only seen this from DP's side, so take with a grain of salt.

And yes >>172783, TJ is legit obnoxious and I don't understand why DP guests even show up half the time when all he does is scream and shout when they show up and then proceed to act like a douchebag to the people that buy their shirts and donate on their Patreon (though I do question why they even bring those guys on the show). Hell, if I were TBR after that two faced bullshit they pulled with the Dusty Smith/Bible Reloaded guys, where they talked shit behind my back while acting friendly and shit one show before, I'd tell them to fuck off for being two faced assholes.

>>172808

She's popular because she's a girl in a sea of fedorafags. She's also super basic which means fedorafags have no standards.

>>172815

I guess. It's one of those things that's hard to speculate, I think

Has there been anymore "leaks" of The Amazing Banana Enthusiast? There's the banana and the hot oil one as far as I know.

>>172833

leaks

HEH

>>172808

>two faced bullshit they pulled with Dusty Smith/Bible Reloaded guys

really? how do they have friends, much less fans

and as for the AiU, I recently subscribed to him because of what I've seen on DP. dude's one of the people who doesn't pull punches regardless of whether or not you're on the same side of certain issues as him

>>172808

also, if you could, can we see webm of them being 2 faced?

>>173001

>>172997

>Webm

I think this section of the video where they more or less talk about them is 9:20 onwards

Basically they had the Bible Reloaded guys on a week or two prior before Cult of Dusty. They're pretty chill and are nowhere near as douchey as TJ, Ben, or Scotty. Then on their show with Dusty Smith on as a guest it was pretty fucking funny how a ton of people in the comments hated him, they threw the BR guys under the bus.

To summarize, they dropped their support of Dusty and his retarded "Logic" brand clothing because he made a joke about Ferguson or something. Regardless of your opinions on Ferguson, they disagreed with it and decided to distance themselves from Dusty because he's pretty much a loose cannon. Then DP tries saying that they're not allowed to make racist jokes about the Japanese because Dusty did it to the black rioters in Ferguson.

In the end, it's two faced because instead of just coming out and confronting them on the subject, they pussy foot around with them then go hang out with Dusty "I GOTTA SCREAM ALL THE TIME TO EXPRESS MY VIEWPOINTS" Smith and basically call them cowards and say they're hypocrites. The whole Dusty Smith/TBR thing is in the eye of the beholder, but DP just out and out acted like two faced pricks who aren't above going behind people's backs to shit talk them EVEN WHEN they have them on their show to ask those kinds of questions.

>>173082

so, to summarize, TJ will (no matter what) defend the NotProductive cunts to the death

good thing he never managed to get spoony yeah, he actually tried getting him to join

still, it's kinda weird to see him do all the white guilt shit and still defend Dusty

I'd say that I slightly agree that it's somewhat hypocritical to stop working with someone because they made racist jokes & you yourself made racist jokes, but at the very least they should have tried inviting them on to ask for their side of the story

and I've seen TBR. not really the funniest shit I've seen, but infinitely better than DP, if for anything because they aren't as annoying

>>173097

Sure, I'll concede it was hypocritical of them to tell racist jokes while also condemning others for it. Regardless, it was their decision and I think Dusty and TJ, of all people, have no right to proclaim others to be hypocrites.

Would I have dropped Dusty if I was put in that situation? Eh, maybe? Honestly, I'd feel worse if it happened to someone who actually comes across as a decent person, but Dusty comes off as a loud, ignorant fuck who yells at you if you disagree with his world view.

As far as

>they should have tried inviting them on to ask for their side of the story

DP had the opportunity the entire show they had them on for, but never did. The only reason I think they didn't is because if they asked them up front, BR would've probably given them a level response. Probably would've been hypocritical, but at least then they would've gotten answer, even if they chose to answer or not.

And yeah, TBR is pretty mellow. Not really funny per-say, but their Bible Study stuff is at least more interesting than the shit TJ puts out now-a-days.

>>173104

somehow this has mutated from a Jaclyn Glenn thread to a Drunken Peasants/Amazing Atheist one

>>173107

Partially my fault. Jaclyn Glenn just isn't as cringy as TJ and DP

>>172563

Muh, Atheism, muh Atheists, we da voice of reason, hurrr durrr, tip, tip, tip tip tip tip.

We are the scientific guy, n richard dorkinz is way smarter than Jesus or Mohammed. tip, tip, tip, tip, tip.

LOOOOOOL Flying Spaghetti Monster. Huuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrr Durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

Muh liberalism, muh trannies, muh gays, n LGBTQCPKJ, we progressive in here, huuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

Tip, tip, tip.

Fuck, Atheists piss me off. I'm pretty much an Atheist myself, but I keep it to myself. Nothing no more annoying than fedoras who build a religious Cult around not believing in anything.

And better still, they love attack Christianity, but won't touch Judaism or the almighty destroyer known as Islam. If that doesn't tell you their disposition and general character, then you're lost.

>>173131

Atheism's love of trannies and Islam (which ironically, their pope/god Richard Dawkins hates) are so very bizarre. On one hand, transgenderism is a mental illness, as science can tell you that one's very cells are aligned to their birth gender, which effects everything from their brains to their skeletons. But no, someone's delusion is more important then basic biology. Islam, on the other hand, is far more brutal than Christianity is, and as far as I know, ever was.

>>173146

don't lump us all in with those pc fags

my view of islam is the same as every other religion. it's sad that adults still need some kind of fairy tales to believe in to the point where they murder in the name of it. seriously, fuck off and rejoin society when you learn to act like fucking adults

as for trannies, i don't give a shit. people get expensive plastic surgery all the time, it won't change a thing in my eyes. you're still a man or a woman, you still have that 2nd x or the y chromosome, and i won't treat you fucking differently just cause you've got tits or lost them & I don't want a fucking artificial version of the real thing i want in bed, period. I'm not gonna use kid gloves around you and i don't care how much that hurts your feelings

as for dawkins, i don't give a shit about him and the only reason i even knew who he was in the first place is cause i saw him fucking mr. garrison like a monkey

>>172637

AIU is sooooo fucking boring. It takes him 50 min to make a 20 min video. "liberal ban hammering"? fcking edgy.

>>172507

the amazing atheist called her out a few times, I think on his podcast

>>172660

holy shit, can you suck AIU dick even harder anon? Even more apologetic please.