/cow/ - Lolcows (Merry Satanmas!)

what's up with that rouner guy who sent pictures of his daughter to sick nick? isn't he connected to cracked?

More like Cucked.com amirite

>>174725

Didnt seanbaby advertise being an sjw cuckold recently. Didnt he recant his older controversial statements and criticize anti-pc/gamergate sentiments?

>>174715

>First cover

>Don't look, it's too scary

Trigger Warnings existed in 1979? And people are surprised Cracked turned SJW.

Cracked wasn't even good when it wasn't socjus. Its old shit was "quality" like "DURRRF WAS LUKE SKYWALKER A VIRGIN? LULZ".

>>174725

But Seanbaby hasn't been funny in a decade.

>>174746

I remember reading one article when it was a magazine.

Their mascots had a rap-off with Eminem and won. Also they seemed offended by his rap and called him a racist sexist homophobe.

I'm old enough to remember Cracked as an actual magazine, and it's sad to see what happened. Strangely enough, their downfall was brought on by the anthrax mail attacks. Whoever mailed the anthrax around the country mailed some to the parent company of Cracked magazine. The governement intervened and destroyed everything in their warehouse, including the master copies of the entire library of Cracked magazine. From there they tried to relaunch as a magazine version of their website and it failed horribly. Left to rot away on the internet, the same thing happened that always happens when a company brings in progressive people to assist in their failing business.

>>174767

>David Hilter

>HILter

oh…

>>174764

The quality of the writing on Cracked was still very spotty under Pinkerton, even if it lacked an agenda. Cracked's quality control has always been awful, and it would've been just as easy for the writers to start being spoiled little shits under Pinkerton as it was for them after Wong arrived. You don't bleed visitors the way Cracked does and fail to react unless you literally don't care about what happens to it at all. Somebody has to care, though, or else it would've been shut down ages ago. The thing is, that somebody has been a giant doormat this whole time.

>>174779

They're Marxists. They probably think turning a profit means they're oppressing brown people.

Another thing worth mentioning is that when you submit an article to be published on cracked it goes to the forum and get critiqued and worked on by the regulars. at this point you can say fuck it and forget all about it and they still own your idea.

>>174783

>Ripping away your authorship

Commies confirmed.

I've never known any forum like that to not be populated by touchy douchebags. So that's part of the propaganda system there I guess.

>>174715

>>174715

What's J.F. Sargent and John Cheese's problem?

>>174783

>>174784

Well…what were you expecting from a magazine that steals jokes and stories?! That's like being shocked to know Jay Leno stole jokes from other people.

>>174744

>Trigger Warnings existed in 1979?

cocks warnings have existed since the 1960s at least. Of course back then they didn't put them on the school curriculum and Students didn't use 'upsetting' cocks as an excuse to do as little work as possible while simultaneously trivialising people with genuine psychiatric disorders.

But, I digress. That cover isn't so much a 'Trigger Warning' as it is early clickbait. They say 'Oh it's too scary' in the hopes that people will be intrigued and buy the magazine.

>And people are surprised Cracked turned SJW

Completely different and unrelated set of people involved.

Didn't they made a issue with a school shooting as the cover page?

As a kid in the early 90's, Cracked was my favorite magazine. (They tended to show more drawn tits and ass and use slightly harsher cuss words.) I feel bad for youth who'll never experience reading MAD or Cracked. Shit was hilarious.

Have we seriously looked into the possibility that Wong is autistic? I mean, I know SJWs in general are really bad at controlling their power level but Wong takes it to another level completely. It's almost as if he has no idea how to interact with people at all.

>>174748

Seanbaby hasn't been funny EVER. Nigger is like the Joe Piscopo of gaming media. Everyone was afraid to make fun of him for fear of his muay thai faggotry.

>>174786

JF Sargent has always been a SJW douchebag; I remember on one of the older iterations of /cwc/ he got into an email debate with anon; After he got BTFO he was all like

>Doesn't matter, I'm right, you're wrong, IGNORE U

John Cheese is just a run of the mill douchebag

>I beat alcohol…. WORSHIP ME

>Gets doxxed because he can't into internet

>DELETES EVERYTHING for like 2 years

>Comes back with messiah complex

Also, word on the street is that auntiememe blows Wong in exchange for her shitty column; Guess Christiana H got tired of all the dicks in her mouth

>>174805

They didn't miss much (I grew up with Cracked and MAD. Cracked was the magazine no one liked compared to MAD). MAD is still around, but still shitty.

>>174808

The Super Friends stuff he did was funny (at least the Aquaman and Superman sections), but the rest of his stuff is garbage. He didn't even put any effort into the "Rest of the Crap" articles he submitted to EGM.

I heard he did some stint with Mtv, and it was pretty awful (Even Mega64 made fun of it).

>>174806

> It's almost as if he has no idea how to interact with people at all.

That's true with most SJWs that operate largely online. It's more that they're used to operating in extremely filtered environments so they don't know how to behave when they're dealing with anyone that doesn't operate within their hugbox.

Just look at Deray on twitter or Shaun King. You can see in their interactions with their followers that most of them are completely unaware of how farcical most of what they say is, and it all comes down to the fact that they don't typically interact with anyone except those that agree with them on everything.

Wong having control on Cracked, pretty much means that he is able to ensure that he only has suck ups on his site, so it must feel wildly unnatural to him when he encounters anyone not engaging in the usual groupthink.

His sperging out about GG on reddit reminds me a bit of that TV's Frank from MST3K that I heard had tried talking about GG and how awful it is in a standup act to a completely bewildered audience.

>>174786

John Cheese is just the typical douchebag who thinks he can get away with it because his life was boohoo so tough.

>muh daddy was a thief

>muh alcoholism

>muh articles which are just repeats of themselves

>feel sorry for me

>>174795

>They say 'Oh it's too scary' in the hopes that people will be intrigued and buy the magazine.

The movie they are making fun of was scary, their spoof wasn't.

>>174860

Which is completely beside the point

>>174860

severin was my favorite comic artist next to jaffee

>>174866

Bill Ward too. God that man loved tits!

Holy fuck has Cracked gone to shit.

You guys remember Cracked TV? Those were the days.

>>174950

I stopped going there years ago, when they started making articles like OP's second image. That's a composite, obviously, but all of those articles are real.

>>174970

>Also linking directly to his articles

>Are you mad?

Like I said, you can't see the comments in archive.is links, and most of them are destroying him for being a sensitive faggot.

But if you insist on not giving clicks, https://archive.is/9h2mU

https://archive.is/Y6D7X

>>174767

DAVE HITLER shit his pants and did nothing WRONG

>>174984

>John Dies At The End

oh, fucking lol. it all falls into place now.

dude was a goon, Something Awful had John Dies At The End ads for years.

>>174987

Yeah, but the work itself isn't bad. The movies better, the book could probably stand some editing. In the end you can't hate him for it. Not when there are so many other reasons to hate him.

My little brother has a Salvador Dali hanging in his shitter. Although it's just a signed numbered litho. Not exactly a one of a kind. Still he respects it enough to keep it. Albeit it in the guest bathroom.

Point is you can judge an artist by the overall merits of a given work and not all the shitty stuff he did with his life. Salvador was a draft dodging Nazi alienating piece of shit, but the man could draw. David Wong is a self aggrandizing magazine killing social leach, but when he sets his mind it it he's not a bad story teller. He has a good sense for symbolism, foreshadowing and seems to know when it's right to eight subvert or appease the readers expectations.

He should however not be in charge of his own publicity or be in charge of a humor site.

Peter principal in action.

It's like putting Steven king in charge of Mad Magazine.

>>174999

Meant to say a Nazi and an alienating piece of shit. He didn't alienate the Nazis on purpose.

>>174987

This really should've been obvious the day Wong decided he'd have Quinn write an article for them. These people are all jungled up together.

>>174999

>It's like putting Steven king in charge of Mad Magazine.

Hey, I'd read it.

>>174982

Some people have mentioned that they'd offer people an opportunity to write an article for them, but never mention anything about paying for it.

They likely pay their regulars very little and get some attention whores writing articles for free on occasion.

I vaguely remember some really shit comic strip writer having some stuff posted on cracked, the one that had the walls of text in every panel. I wouldn't be surprised if woman had a patreon account and was happy enough to have the comic posted there to help with getting some attention for it.

But with many of their regulars, I imagine they largely have regular jobs they do while Wong makes the bulk of the money to actually live on.

So all they really have to pay for is the server to host the site on, and they probably still get some money from having some ads on the site.

Enlightening how Wong didn't even know Cracked's mascot (Sylvester) and referred to him as the blonde boy.

Must be amazing being a part of something you know absolutely nothing about, or the history of, and have zero embarrassment about letting that be known.

Then again I'm an oldfag (in life, not 8chan) and was born in '73 so I have many fond memories in the 80s of buying Cracked and Mad on Saturdays from a newsstand. But still, it just makes Wong look that much more pathetic.

>>175021

Back in 2009 or so, they would have ads on the page that said "get paid to write for us." I forget how much it would pay, but they were definitely overt about it. Don't know if they changed their MO in recent years.

>>175026

It was before they tried so hard to shill for the De-Textbook and the other thing with the zombies or whatever, but I do remember those ads. They ran even as late as 2012.

I briefly considered actually writing for them, before I realized the place was going down the shitter.

Talk about old shames.

>>174765

>Strangely enough, their downfall was brought on by the anthrax mail attacks. Whoever mailed the anthrax around the country mailed some to the parent company of Cracked magazine. The governement intervened and destroyed everything in their warehouse, including the master copies of the entire library of Cracked magazine.

Holy shit, is this true?

If so, then that explains a lot.

>>175057

Hey who doesn't want to get paid to write about the top 10 ways animals were successfully used as improvised explosive devices by special forces trapped behind enemy lines in Vietnam? I considered giving it a try.

>>175025

>Then again I'm an oldfag (in life, not 8chan) and was born in '73 so I have many fond memories in the 80s of buying Cracked and Mad on Saturdays from a newsstand. But still, it just makes Wong look that much more pathetic.

Shit and here I thought everyone on 8chan were born in the late 90 or early 00honestly though every time they do a poll this group comes on top

Btw what did you think of the 90s? Lots of people try to draw similarities to the current sjw cancer and that age but I dont remember any of this happening at the time but then again I was a little kid.

>>174765

Interesting story.

I'm quite certain the people running cracked now have nothing to do with the magazine though. It's been sold off and changed hands many times since the magazine died off. That being said,

>a company brings in progressive people to assist in their failing business.

is still an accurate description, though it's less a case of the company "bringing in" progressives than selling themselves off to progressives.

>>175012

>>175021

Cracked has corporate ownership. There's rumors going around that they might pull the plug.

>>175078

These types of people were around in the 90s, but between the constant efforts to out-ridiculous themselves and the confirmation bias that the internet has allowed, things have gotten much worse.

The shit with Alan Sokal happened in the mid-90s.

>>175026

>>175021

Last I checked it was $100 per ~2000 word article. $200 if it got enough views.

$0.05 a word is a pretty shitty rate.

>>175078

>>175128

The "Politically Correct" campaigns and causes were probably the 90s version of the SJW cancer (I grew up in the 90s). It was more about being wholesome and accepting everyone/everything with wishy-washy contexts, which was what shows like Duckman and even Beavis & Butt-Head made fun of. 90s Feminism blended in with the PC stuff. Like >>175078 said, it's much worse now.

The funny thing about Cracked becoming a SJW shit-hole was it used to make fun of that stuff in the past (again, very poorly because Cracked was always shitty).

>>174975

I don't have any hope on Cracked's comment section because of the janitors that do it for free, leaving only the commentators that jack off the article better. Among the cancer, the few comments that are reasonable often get dogpiled and downvoted to oblivion by the fanboy brigade, followed by even more cancer.

This shit was so bad that Cracked fans went out of their way to create their own separate forum site where they could comment on Cracked's articles without the draconic moderation, so they could comment on and not have their posts deleted.

>>174765

>Whoever mailed the anthrax around the country mailed some to the parent company of Cracked magazine. The governement intervened and destroyed everything in their warehouse, including the master copies of the entire library of Cracked magazine. From there they tried to relaunch as a magazine version of their website and it failed horribly. Left to rot away on the internet, the same thing happened that always happens when a company brings in progressive people to assist in their failing business.

I tried to find actual evidence of this, and the only thing i can find is a cracked article on it. So it may well be true, but my cursory search didn't find another primary source.

>>174828

>That's true with most SJWs that operate largely online. It's more that they're used to operating in extremely filtered environments so they don't know how to behave when they're dealing with anyone that doesn't operate within their hugbox

>His sperging out about GG on reddit reminds me a bit of that TV's Frank from MST3K that I heard had tried talking about GG and how awful it is in a standup act to a completely bewildered audience.

Totally agree.

>>174984

I was shocked that the most memorable movie I had seen in some time was made by a sperg.

>>175000

Was he really a nazi? I know he did paintings of hitler, but didnt he characterize hitler as a masochist?

>>175078

>tfw older than average.

It's a weird feel. I get the impression that users here are older than on cuckchan.

>>175025

I don't know why, but I always got the impression that David Wong a was failed writer who resented people much more successful than him. Like every article he wrote was about how life sucks, or how Hollywood is bad based off his own terrible experiences. His work is way too Pessimistic to be considered SJW.

>>175189

He complained about his experiences in Hollywood? In what way?

Does anyone have CBRs or PDFs of any of the old stuff? Shit's hard to find on the net.

>>175189

Self loathing and being a crusader on the Internet aren't mutually exclusive. In fact they often go together. People who hate themselves will often try to make themselves feel better by trying to convince others that they're good people really, and to that end they often go full SJW these days. In the old days they'd go full religion instead.

I used to read a lot of cracked around the 2005-2010. Good stuff, but you could tell the place was slipping.

I think by the middle of 2010 I jumped ship. That was around the time I realized somethigawful was complete shit anymore, among other things.

I know people bring up 'the big bang' and iphone theories, but after 2008, fucking everything went to hell. Everything.

>>175204

How come general consensus is that the internet went to hell roughly around 2006-2008? That's an incredibly specific period.

>>175261

Are you asking why it went to hell around that time?

That's around the time the economy imploded. The recession is probably the root cause of all that's wrong with the media these days.

>>175261

Influx of kids who never lived without the internet?

>>175152

I do remember those but it wasn't this kind of stupid shit, more like "don't laugh at the kid with cancer" which is only common sensebut some parents are total shit so the kids dont know

But I remember these extreme outrage cunts were lambasted in the media all the time, like the polar opposite of what happens now

>>175276

>But I remember these extreme outrage cunts were lambasted in the media all the time, like the polar opposite of what happens now

Well the inmates are running the asylum now

>>175181

>It's a weird feel. I get the impression that users here are older than on cuckchan.

8chan is really full of people who have a more adult, "Quality over quantity" mindset. It'll really slow some boards down, but it lets places like /tg/ trive a bit since they were about that anyway.

>>175261

>How come general consensus is that the internet went to hell roughly around 2006-2008? That's an incredibly specific period.

My guess? More and more teenagers got on the internet though school, accessing things like myspace (and later) facebook and simply kept going, finding new places as they went and dipping themselves in a sites culture. Saturation, essentially.

>>175276

They tried to find be politically correct about everything from racial matters to the way you cooked your food in the 90s. Only the dumbest & loudest of the extreme outrage cunts get their teeth kicked in by the media even to this day (Again, they have to be dumb. Anita and Zoey know how to con people while looking innocent, but people like Chou and Coffin lack common sense).

>>175303

I thought it was agreed that post quality dropped after 2006.

>>175300

I migrated here during the exodus (/cow/ already being here was part of why I stayed) I made three boards when I got here.

For months I flooded them with cocks whenever I had spare time. Eventually I got busy with a bunch of other stuff and stopped.

Every so often I'll go back and check and find new posts with people saying "How do we revive this board?" because they like it, remember fun threads that were posted, etc. Some people actively advertise them on other boards. I get the biggest smile on my face when I see one of my boards being advertised somewhere else, even though the success of it has varied from board to board. To the point that I'm considering spending a couple bucks and advertising the boards once in a while.

Meanwhile, there was a fourth board I made with my girlfriend for one of her fetishes, and she spent a ton of time customizing it and making it pretty, but despite all the effort that went into the board -and the floods I put together to try to keep it alive- she repeatedly killed the board by banning damn near every single poster despite the topic being one of her sexual fetishes she's kind of a prude about other people expressing it, and routinely banned people. Before long I found myself making posts to apologize for her behavior and try to explain it away as part of the fetish as people were actively posting to complain about "that rude cunt that keeps banning everyone." I eventually abandoned the board completely, and it sits without a single post for like seven months because she pretty much banned everyone that posted there.

>>175303

The only thing I missed about that period was when people didn't act like faggots over esports and video game scores no one out of video games gives two shits about.

>>175303

2007 was the year that cuckchan removed /n/ because Christopher Poole got triggered by what was being posted there.

>>175382

hold the fuck up nigga what was bad about chanology

>>175383

>paying money to "ignores-his-site" to advertise your boards

>>175261

That's when it went mainstream. Everything that grows big enough and begins to attract more attention and money goes to shit. Internet is no different than books, talk shows, stand up, tech start-ups, art, bands, electronic goods, restaurants, clothing brands, etc.

>>175391

4chan became too popular for its own good.

>>175374

> 'MRA are kissless virgins'

I never quite got that. MRAs seem to be preoccupied with divorce laws, child custody, and false rape accusations over anything else. All of the above are concerns for people who get laid regularly. It would make more sense to call them dude-bro douche bags.

>>175397

You're expecting them to use logic and reason when describing something that goes against their narrative.

What's easier, coming up with an actual retort and facts to back it up, or be a typical lefty and make some character assassination bullshit up to slander the enemy?

didn't they also write an article defending pedos?

like "Misunderstandings about pedophlies" or some shit. most likely a top 5 or 10 list

>>175444

Yeah. It was written by the same guy who tweeted a picture of his daughter to Nick Nyberg when Milo's article came out.

>>175445

wow, just wow

these assholes are amazingly retarded

>>175303

>This was the golden era of the internet 2006-2010 were golden year.

I don't know. Things began to shift around 2008 from what I remember, but the internet was at least tolerable up until 2012. It seems like the last little bit of 2012 and 2013 saw an unprecedented explosion of faggotry. The internet seemed to turn into a battleground over night.

>>175458

2012 was when the Social Justice bullshit really started to take off.

It's also the year that Obama got re-elected so maybe there's some correlation.

>>175465

>and didn't think it would ever catch on in the mainstream

Well it hasn't. Mainstream media maybe, but whenever social justice is exposed to a greater audience than Twitter and Tumblr the universal reaction is usually disgust or mockery. Look at shirtstorm, look at the current season of South Park.

>>175391

Kei and Yuri are jews?

>>175391

Officially licensed 4ChanMan©

>>175458

Agreed. I blame the unbearable amount of fagottry on eveyone getting online. Sure, people used the internet they expected the internet to bend to them, rather than early web 1.0 days when they stayed the fuck off line and used the internet to only find movie times or read the news.

I blame everyone getting online on facebook. Social media is when Normies started spending more than an hour a day online.

and 100% agree, 2012 was when faggotry went out of control online. This is when you started seeing web 3.0. A push for websites to protect fee fees, ask for private info like phone numbers, and use apps that gather all your personal info instead of making the actual website. Fucking hate the focus of mobile browsing.

>>175382

You may be right. A lot of my nostalgia is based aroung web 2.0, tools like noscript and abp just coming out letting me browse where I want without my computer getting AIDS, the death of virus wire, rise of torrents (even though they were around since like 04).

I do have to keep in mind there was a downside too. The rise of FB as well as you mom wanting to be your friend on FB happened. I handled this with extreme trolling but it was definately a new problem the internet had never seen before.

most people blame it on the big bang theory, making being a "nerd" cool then all the normies wanted to have nerd cred and could hang.

sites like new grounds were dying off, JewTube started implimenting a cocks system, ect. but there were always ways to get what you wanted durring this time period.

Netflix streaming began to take off around then and was great.

The best cows, trolls and lulz came around this time. CWC saga was amazing

Also this was the Golden Years of ED. I am a huge EDiot, and back then they were ontop of all drama that was happening all the time.

But 2007 is when websites made anti-bulying attempts. I always found these amusing though because the attempts didn't work and often times lead to the victim having the website come down on them for breaking TOC I used to fuck with people all the time. A ban just meant start up a new profile and let the fun begin again.

I guess its when people started getting butthurt 24/7 and acting like massive faggots. Also pre-2007 the web was all about what kind of fucked up stuff you could find, now people have no stomach for shock. When people discovered 2 girls 1 cup I didn't get the big deal cause I'd seen scat years before.

Maybe portal, tf2, CoD and netflix are clouding my judgement…. But isn't this same nostalgia also part of the stuff that made 2007-2010 great?

Then again, may be alone on this. I just feel like things are being taken away now online.

>>175140

Fuck, that's actually not too bad for most English majors or anyone competent with typing. In comparison, transcription pays you about $2 an hour if you're good at it, and can stand listening to people who don't understand how distance affects the recording of sound. For what's essentially a 2000 word essay, that you get to fill about 30% with humor, that's not bad.

To a person between jobs, a nickle for a word is not a bad prospect at all. Too bad the only site offering something like this is now as fucking reliable as a checkout rag.

>>175201

Pretty much this. Back then (and this is coming from a Catholic, so I have seen some shit), people comforted themselves that they weren't really assholes; they were just being oppressed and mocked by critics because of their beliefs that were totally well-intended and for the good of society. If you saw that sentence and realized that SJWs are people who think they're being oppressed and mocked by critics because of their beliefs that were totally well-intended and for the good of society, then congratulations. You now know what it's like to be a (Catholic/Liberal) watching a hardcore (fanatic/SJW) make an ass/ass of (themselves/>her-self) while sharing your leanings. It's fucking depressing.

>>175261

Safespaces and hugboxes. The first generation to grow up with the internet (despite Tumblr's crying and deluded protests that they were the 'first generation') was before that time period, where there wasn't a such thing as entire websites bending over for 'hurt feelings'. If you were a colossal jackass or dipshit, people had almost free reign on calling you out on it, documenting it, even wrecking your online presence with it. But at least you would hopefully learn from that and be less of a horrible person.

If you were a pedophile stalking the internet and you were retarded enough to let the world know, the internet would absolutely destroy you. In modern times, if you're an open pedophile and you're stupid enough to let everyone know, now you get your own article on a shitty website and legions of online idiots defending you because you pat their egos on the back every now and then.

It's a very different age, this internet.

>>175466

I wouldn't even say it made it to mainstream media fulltime, either. Almost every big-time comedy or crime drama has 'that' episode. The one with the hipster SJW extremist (probably college aged, hilariously enough) that goes too far and is a surprisingly accurate portrayal of SJWs. In a comedy, they'll wind up attracting or dragging some unwitting main cast character into their little group, until the third act of the episode reveals them to be a cult of unreasonable hypocrites that either misses the point of their cause entirely or scares off all their own supporters. In a crime drama, they'll probably start off as a mere witness (or victim, even), until the third act reveals them to be the criminal that felt they were entirely justified in doing what they did, because 'muh justice'.

Either way, the moral of the episode is a mix of 'good intentions cause stupid people to do bad things' and 'too much of anything can be a bad thing'.

Overall, I get the feeling this current model of SJWs will die off. Every group has had an (usually) initial extremist group that makes them look bad at the time, that history eventually tries to forget (probably for the better). Catholics had the Inquisition. Black rights had the Black Panthers. Animal groups have PETA.

It's a comforting lesson to know that eventually, those gave way to peaceful missionaries, MLK, and non-insane activists, respectively, and people follow their (much better) example instead, while the bad examples of those groups become caricatures of what not to do in the name of those causes- caricatures that those very groups laugh at today. Because the opposite of faggotry isn't just being able to laugh at your own absurd history, but being able to learn from it and realize certain way didn't work for a reason. These 'bad' examples of a group eat themselves and become irrelevant for that very same thing: they can't laugh at their own shortcomings, and they don't learn from their mistakes. And that describes modern SJWs to a 't'.

>>175659

Oh jesus do I know what you mean. I've been on the internet since the begining since I was a child. I even remember a brief part of life without it.

Random thought: Chat rooms were cool, but they are antiquated for a while. Nothing has ever caught that same feeling, but thats nostalgia

I'd say its fracturing into tribes again but this time the tribes are bending the knee to their venture capitalist holders. Look at Reddit for example, while it wasn't a lot of peoples cup of tea it a great link aggrigate, and once conde nast bought them they went right down the toilet.

Look at what twitter did once the replacement ceo got in then harassment feminism brigade went in.

The share holders are the new censor. And parent companies have found a genius marketing euphamism with protecting people, because after all trolls are ramp-id.

>>175300

>8chan is really full of people who have a more adult, "Quality over quantity" mindset. It'll really slow some boards down, but it lets places like /tg/ trive a bit since they were about that anyway.

You'll find that imageboards other than cuckchan have older posters. I think a large reason is simply that cuckchan censors mention of any other imageboards (or at least has done so for the majority of its time operating), so most posters there don't even know there are other imageboards or at least what they're like to post on.

>>175397

>I never quite got that. MRAs seem to be preoccupied with divorce laws, child custody, and false rape accusations over anything else. All of the above are concerns for people who get laid regularly. It would make more sense to call them dude-bro douche bags.

The feminists that hate MRAs never bring up what MRAs are saying. It's a bit like at the Suffragettes premiere there were women protesting on the red carpet because some shelters for abuse victims were being defunded, which sounds a bit bad until you learn the reason they're being defunded is because they refused to help any men as they were being told to by the government in order to continue getting funding. The feminists were very seriously protesting because they didn't want men to be able to go to a shelter for victims of domestic abuse. Few articles in the news about it will even mention these facts, largely because the feminists won't dare bring it up.

>>175465

Most of the SocJus bullshit really ramped up in 2008. Given it was the year Obama was elected it's hard for me to not see a link. As soon as he was elected there was one article after another defending Obama's friends that were very proudly racist and really just atrocious assholes to all those around them. This was also the time that any complaints about Obama were being framed as racist. I think this all helped to promote the notion that people in power could be openly treated as victims that need even more power to make up for their treatment.

>>175726

Speaking of the Suffragettes:

http://takimag.com/article/will_feminisms_next_big_wave_finally_be_the_one_that_drowns_it_jim_goad/print

>>175562

>the Golden Years of ED

Too bad Girlvinyl somehow turned tail and left the lulz.

I wonder how OhI is doing

>>175726

>>175734

>The feminists that hate MRAs never bring up what MRAs are saying. It's a bit like at the Suffragettes premiere there were women protesting on the red carpet because some shelters for abuse victims were being defunded, which sounds a bit bad until you learn the reason they're being defunded is because they refused to help any men as they were being told to by the government in order to continue getting funding. The feminists were very seriously protesting because they didn't want men to be able to go to a shelter for victims of domestic abuse. Few articles in the news about it will even mention these facts, largely because the feminists won't dare bring it up.

Man… Their hatred of men is so out of control they'd rather lose funding than help male victims. Why the fuck this happens and people still insist on equality?

>>175777

Ohinternet shut down 2 years ago

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/OhInternet#Closure

>>175300

No, just less users. Go look at 8chan /pol/ for 30 seconds. It's a clusterfuck of conspiracy theorists shit posting. Including the mods

>>175726

>You'll find that imageboards other than cuckchan have older posters. I think a large reason is simply that cuckchan censors mention of any other imageboards (or at least has done so for the majority of its time operating), so most posters there don't even know there are other imageboards or at least what they're like to post on.

Funny enough, I am total proof of that. After I got into cuckchan in 04-06, the only other boards I went to were Operatorchan and 99chan; and even then I never really posted, just lurked.

>>175805

Maybe for some, but I still feel like some boards have just had an increase in quality- I still remember a discussion over "Killing in the name of justice" on /TG/ that got extremely philosophical, moreso than I had seen on halfchan.

>>174746

Eh, sure it was low brow ULTIMATE EXTREME SNAKE FIGHTING SHARKS!!! shit, but sometimes when you've finished being serious, you want some dumb silly shit for desert, and that's what Cracked was for.

Now, it's about pushing an agenda on you. So, it's low brow low IQ blah blah but with progressive agendas instead of silly jokes. It became preachy without the skill to even do so in a convincing way.

>>175797

Everyone knew feminism was a joke.

Even a century ago:

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Fraud_of_Feminism

>>175820

It doesn't take much to be better than half/tg/. I used to go there a lot, but last time I checked a couple months ago it had gotten real bad. There was a thread about posting OC races and it devolved into a shitfit over proper pronouns and genders.

I wish I was kidding.

I can't imagine the other boards here are worse than their cuckchan counterparts if they actually stay on topic.

>>175895

Depends on how rulefagged they are/who the BO and vols are. /tv/ is quickly turning into 4/tv/ with the amount of rule creep happening. /a/ is so rulefagged they hide the board logs. /v/ is "anything Mark doesn't like is banned". /pone/ is "we're too retarded to turn off name/subject/email but we'll ban you if you use a name"-tier.

>>175895

/co/ just spends all it's time yelling about SJWs and how they ruined cartoons/comics. It's to the point that if you try to make a thread about something positive or just to talk about a comic/cartoon it'll be lost in a sea of people complaining.

>>175895

OC races? You mean made up races like the Armenians?

>>175860

>those games

>good

>the fox report

>alerting normies about MUH EVUL 4CHAIN

>good

Kill yourself, post haste.

>>174715

Couldn't have happened to an unfunnier faggot.

>>175860

I agree, well, apart from Boring Crusade

>>175303

>Are you kidding? This was the golden era of the internet 2006-2010 were golden year.

The Internet has been shit since shortly after Berners-Lee invented the web. The web and retard level GUIs for everything unleashed a flood of drooling morons who ruined everything, like a plague of retarded locusts.

>>175382

>portal

>call of duty 4

>burning crusade

>chanology

>4chan leaking

>tumblr

>memes on t-shirts

>the big bang theory

Behold: the cavalcade of shit that ruined everything. Portal, Call of Duty 4, and the Burning Crusade was what invited gamur gulz, codbabbies, and casuals deprived of critical thinking to video games. The Big Bang Theory did the same thing to "nerd culture" in general. Tumblr and memes on t-shirts are self explanatory. And the Chanology and 4chan reports are the reason newfags flooded 4chan to be edgy and show all their Facebook friends they can hang with the meme masters.

I don't care if any of this itself is good or not, it's what wrought all the destruction we've been bitter about for the last eight years.

>>176229

>meme masters

Jesus. Another fucking Goobergate thread. Why can't you idiots keep it on your containment boards?

>>176274

Stop whining about Goofygate.

>>176274

inb4 some GG faggot spergs about your use of the word goobergate. that really grinds their gears for some reason.

>>176274

tenbux pls go

>>176293

Fucking called it. Apparently the only people who are allowed to use that term after SA goons.

>>175078

>Btw what did you think of the 90s? Lots of people try to draw similarities to the current sjw cancer and that age but I dont remember any of this happening at the time but then again I was a little kid.

Take a look at this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCU_%28film%29

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110759/

>>175800

I remember when OI first appeared. Feels like last year. Hard to believe it's been dead for so long.

If you need more shit on John Cheese, here's some stuff I dug up on him:

>shitposts at corporate twitter accounts. Thinks it's okay to harass whoever is writing for them because they get paid by a big corporation.

>Tried to sell a ebook collecting all his tweets

>ebegged to fund his wedding with the promise of sharing the video with the people who funded him. Never delivered.

As for Wong, besides being a beta cuck on reddit, he also has an account on the James Randi forums. I didn't see much lulz there but it was where he was doing "research" on his article where he claimed that it was impossible for landwhales to lose weight.

>>174715

Does anybody still use this cuckold website?

I wager a certain group of merchants bought cracked.com and then cucked it to promote their marxist agendas.

>>176845

Great meme spam dude!

You're making a great point! Keep it up!

>>176858

>(1)

>meme spam

Git gud.

>>176965

Oh shit I'm so envious of your post count in this thread.

>>176965

>giving a shit about post count

autism/10

>>176970

>gets called out

>gets mad

lol errytiem

>>177090

I don't understand, what exactly did you call him out for?

>>177101

Probably that there's a lack of argument on your behalf.

>>177101

Are you still getting a shitty degree in Australia?

>>175659

Facebook pretty much introduced representing yourself on the internet.

Real name, real life friends and colleagues, real life location and all that. People suddenly didn't make a difference between RL and the internet. Everything went to shit at that point.

The niggers took cyberbullying for real because they couldn't fucking listen to what computer experts have been telling the daft cunts since the 90s to not use your real name or post pictures of yourself. They just fucking HAD to bring their ego to the internet as if anyone would actually give a fuck.

It was Eternal September times a thousand. Neverending droves of normies not knowing how to behave on the internet diluting the culture of it until complete destruction.

Shit makes me mad.

>>177210

It's still kinda gay to use facebook for that CB shit.

I still don't understand what this post count shit is about.

>>177278

Some dipshit (shown with a single post) said 'called it' in reply to another post, which itself was in reply to a different ID (also single post).

As >>176554 put it:

>admitting to changing IP and ID to samefag and shitpost

>>174950

>>175716

I like Swaim, does he still do anything? Ever since Cracked TV, he's been my favourite contributor, and one of the few who haven't gone horribly downhill

>>189599

Of course Sargeant would say that. He'd also cheer on Jamaal, Jarrod and Tyrone while they're airlocking his girl.

>>189595

That's an impressive amount of passive agressiveness. Written by their resident pretend-asian, slayer of reddit sexism himself, of course. The fact that every complaint is formulated in a way as to make the complainant seem unreasonable and hatefilled doesn't really give the impression that Wong has a large amount of respect for his audience.

I used to love Cracked. The numbered list trivia stuff was pretty neat, first place I heard of Audie Murphy.

I remember how the articles started to get more and more sjw as time went on, and I eventually stopped reading entirely. It's been over a year since I last visited.

I miss the good old days.

>>175303

>Are you kidding? This was the golden era of the internet 2006-2010

Nigger how old are you? 17?

>>175397

>divorce laws, child custody, and false rape accusations

>dude-bro douche bags

How did you end up with that conclusion? how does a concern over legal issues makes someone a douchebag? its not fucking pronouns they bitch about but unfair laws that can fuck up your life

>>175444

Shit salon did it and they didn't get the antipedos to rip them a new asshole

>>175465

Occupy was fucking dead in 2012 kid, just because you didn't see this shit coming doesnt means the cancer didn't start much before

>>177210

I'm tired or "eternal september", that shit its the definition of 'secrit club' butthurt fags.

Back then most people didn't own a PC because even with windows 3.1 you needed SOME fucking idea of what you were doing to even turn on a PC. The people who went online in 1994 were not complete idiots like today's normalfags are, they simply weren't part of the exclusive club of dorks from the CS dept. of the local university

The cancer that shit like this >>189807 brought to the internet its simply unprecedented, its never been easier to do shit on the internet than it is today and as a consequence I seen normalfags posting shit so cringey that I seriously think this people shouldn't be allowed to go online at all, no so much for my sake but for their own

>>175397

MRAs are still in shock over how society lied to them.

I was considering going to one of their conventions (Karen Strachan's videos give me a hardon) but the prospect of hanging around a bunch of angry manlets turned me off. I'll fuck Karen some other time.

>>189832

>How did you end up with that conclusion? how does a concern over legal issues makes someone a douchebag? its not fucking pronouns they bitch about but unfair laws that can fuck up your life

The logic is that because the guys are concerned with men rather than women that they must be dudebro douchebags.

It's like how the complain that there's a greater need for feminism to fix discrimination against men.

>Occupy was fucking dead in 2012 kid, just because you didn't see this shit coming doesnt means the cancer didn't start much before

It went on like a walking corpse for a fairly long while. Largely because SJW types kept wanting to use it as a platform to espouse their bullshit. Their idea of a 1% that needs to be taken down still persists among the college crowd today. The lack of understanding of how the economy works is astounding.

"A funny website filled with funny videos, pics, articles, and a whole bunch of other funny stuff."

That's seriously crack's own description of their website. How fucking retarded can they be?

>>189854

They used to an actual comedy site at one time, believe it or not.

Now they've decided they want to be social justice clickbait activism peppered with just enough dick jokes to distract retards from noticing that it stopped being a comedy site about 4 years ago.

They seemed brave and courageous because they spoke out against "the establishment" at the time. Now that they are the establishment, their true colors begin to show.

>>189847

>It's like how the complain that there's a greater need for feminism to fix discrimination against men.

Except the discrimination against women its greatly exaggerated and in some cases even imaginary, while the laws against men are very real. In france for example a guy simply CANNOT ask for a paternity test and can go to jail if he gets one done "illegally", meaning that in france pretty much any knocked-up bitch can walk towards you and say you're are her baby's daddy……….and you have literally no way to avoid having to pay child support! unless you leave literally everything behind and get the fuck out of the country, and most likely europe itself since any of the EU countries is most likely going to send your ass back to france so they can take your money and jail you.

Search that shit, I'm not lying

>SJW types kept wanting to use it as a platform to espouse their bullshit

Ironically they were the shitheads that destroyed occupy and turned it into a joke, shit like the progressive stack was such a fucking turn off for most people that some theorize the SJW got paid to go and co-op/REKT occupy

>>189877

To be fair that started out of necessity. Click bait makes money. People with myopic self perpetuating opinions naturally fall for click bait. It's just selling out.

>>189599

>>189595

Fucking jews. Is Sargent the one who sent a picture of his kid to a known pedophile in solidarity?

>>189907

most of this is shit that annoys /v/ and /pol/ toddlers

>>189832

>>189916

This is from my comment you referred to:

>I never quite got that. MRAs seem to be preoccupied with divorce laws, child custody, and false rape accusations over anything else. All of the above are concerns for people who get laid regularly. It would make more sense to call them dude-bro douche bags.

Pay attention to the stuff in bold. In simpler terms, it meas that since many issues that MRAs focus on revolve around fucking and consequences of it, they can't be virgins since virgins worry about having sex rather than its consequences. Meanwhile, you average "bro" is a polar opposite of a virgin and he has to worry about consequences of having sex more than getting pussy.

Hence, despite being a hyperbole to make SJW argument seem retarded, comparing MRAs to dude-bro douchebags is more accurate than comparing them to kissless virgins.

>>190108

0/8 b8

>>189595

Wong's done an amazing amount of fallacious doublethink in that article.

>>190110

>Jef Rouner.

I checked his twitter, and apparently, people who disagree with him don't just have different opinions, they're objectively wrong. They should stop debating different aspects and just agree with Jef already. Didn't they get the memo?

https://archive.is/cIPOs

Apparently black under representation, as an example, is evidence not only of black discrimination, but conclusive evidence. I was of the opinion that you couldn't simply couldn't attribute the over representation to one factor, and completely ignore things like poverty and IQ.

It is however okay to have opinions on topics where he hasn't told us the answer yet. For example, he claims that scientists don't know why water increases in size when freezing "while literally nothing else in the world does", which he later corrects because other substances do the same. I thought the reason for water increasing in size when freezing rather obviously was that all the water crystal formations with sufficiently low energy to be stable and occur in nature takes more space than water does in its fluid form. It's quite impressive for someone who considers himself an authority on this stuff to update the article and still get it wrong.

>>190114

>0/8 b8

I didn't need any more confirmation you were a twelve year old redpill slayer but thanks anyway

>>190198

>It's quite impressive for someone who considers himself an authority on this stuff to update the article and still get it wrong.

Actually, he corrected that too. I must have misread it.

>>190312

Requesting the real one

Good shit ITT.

David Wong is basically a low-teir Johnathan McIntosh. He was a former conservative young creationist turned nihilistic cultural marxist.

John Cheese, his lifelong thread, is a fat, drug-addicted, drunkard who has had numerous spergouts and cringe moments.

There are more but those two are the first to come to mind. Have fun digging up on these losers, the lulz will be glorious.

>>190677

I think he just meant the "my parents are proud I write at cracked!" reply.

>>190114

A lot of them just latch on to mra because it's an outlet for their misogyny. Lots of feminist just latch on to feminism because they hate men. People don't always pick their political views based on logic.

>>190675

What?

What the fuck does that even mean?

What kid's parents don't own a computer?

It never says the games belong to his mom. This nigga's reading comprehension is so bad he can't even read 2nd grade writing.

>>190317

>I didn't need any more confirmation you were a twelve year old

Try staying away from remarks people would assume came directly from an Amazing Atheist video comment section.

I enjoyed a few links to Cracked back in the day.

Good to be updated on it, though. Just in case the odd link gets thrown to me and the bait looks tempting.

>>191337

The truly awful thing is that Buzzfeed could probably claim that title and be totally justified.

>>175716

Aside from the girl obviously being the girl I have no idea who the labels apply to

I'd guess Dan was the beta, Swaim was the aging tween and Soren the divorcee, but really all the labels apply to all of them (except maybe Soren and tween, I've always had the feeling that he knows exactly what he's in).

>>175503

>something this immoral

URGE TO PURGE RISING.

>>190695

>He was a former conservative young creationist turned nihilistic cultural marxist.

Source?