09009a No.178978
Valis77/ValisHD, one of Anita Sarkeesian's Twitch channel mods, is a registered sex offender
HannibalLector13, one of Anita Sarkeesian's biggest fans, is also a registered sex offender
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/ValisHD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTiEZlezqIM
aeeba1 No.178998
What do you expect from the people that brought you "no bad tactics, only bad targets"?
"Mindkilling" themselves is a big part of the progressives, removing the badthought from their mind so they are obviously better than you, not having mindkilled your pedo, sexist and misogynist parts that you MUST have like them, right?
Honesty this SJW shit reads more like a 12 step program for people who struggle with said issues for a lot of them, except theres only 1 step, repent for thee hath sinned,
c5d06a No.179000
You need to look at the feminists as born again Christians. They found a cult that will redeem them of their past sins and make them feel good about themselves, so they become as zealous as possible.
fbfa53 No.179050
Happy to see Valis getting the shit he deserves, remember when it first came out he was a pedo fuck years ago and tons of his youtube click defended him , so better late then never.
1620f7 No.179054
If only there were real cops here, who would leak gossip on these sexual monsters.
1a1879 No.179057
I thought the hannibal one was fake or something, but Valis is a proper pedo and /pol/ meme come to life.
5c119c No.179081
HannibalLector13, one of Anita Sarkeesian's biggest fans, is also a registered sex offender.
Hannibal Lector 13. Seriously? Now that's a pair of brass balls. Was IT13 taken?
09009a No.179100
There is no way Anita and co can talk her way out of this. There's so much evidence that this guy is a pedophile.
595dbe No.179101
Kirtaner from 420chan and SA works for Quin/Sarkessian too and he's a self-admitted pedo who likes to dress up as a little girl and stick shit up his ass.
5c119c No.179102
>>179101
Not sure that's actually pedophilia. I'm not sure what to call that.
325bf4 No.179103
>>179102
Self-admitted paedohpile, degenerate.
That's what you call him.
5c119c No.179105
>>179103
Yeah, but what he's actually into isn't pædophilic. It's just weird. Was he molested as a kid?
09009a No.179106
https://archive.is/dUu63
This shit gets sicker by the minute.
5abb01 No.179108
All right.
How do we send this nigga back to jail?
325bf4 No.179113
>>179112
Oh i meant nothing by it, i just wanted to post that image to another tab, i should have saged, and not replied to anyone lel.
5c119c No.179114
>>179112
It looks like one of the vampire children American Horror Story : Hotel.
09009a No.179121
>all white
Fucking niggers.
5abb01 No.179122
Seriously guise, how do we get him sent back to jail?
95499f No.179123
>>179122
Pretend to be a 13 year old girl online and entrap him?
5abb01 No.179124
>>179123
Great!
All we need to do now is call Chris Hansen
5c119c No.179131
>>179121
That's what bothers you? So if it was Asians or black children you'd be more OK with it? So this is better http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2564343/Fugitive-Nazis-built-paedophile-paradise-sun.html ?
God damn racist. Learn to hate on an individual basis, like a normal person.
5c119c No.179135
>>179123
Probably too old for him.
4afd69 No.179136
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>179131
It's typical that people of all races are more attracted to white people, but it doesn't make it feel any less disgusting when you see people of other races fetishizing children of your race.
Often times these people that fetishize whites seem to do so because they think by dominating someone by sexually overcoming them is showing how much more powerful they are as individuals, or they simply hate white people a great deal and don't care about abusing whites.
5c119c No.179137
>>179136
>>179136
Keep telling yourself that.
4afd69 No.179139
>>179137
You can look up rape statistics as well as data that's been collected about dating habits yourself.
09009a No.179142
The PIDF is out in full force.
5c119c No.179143
>>179139
Then why are there so many blacks?
5c119c No.179144
>>179142
Before we jump to conclusions, do we know how old the other party was? I'd hate to jump a guy for shagging a 17 year old.
09009a No.179145
>>179143
>muh identity politics
09009a No.179147
>>179144
She was 14 or 15 years old, and he tried to sollicit sex from her, presumably online.
09009a No.179148
5c119c No.179151
>>179147
No one cares about spelling on an imageboard. Gramer either. Unless, they have teh tism.
4afd69 No.179163
>>179143
Because they have sex often? It's more an issue that blacks are just more violent sexually towards whites than they are towards any other group anyway.
1d4df3 No.179169
>>179142
Unfortunately, I doubt Anita or Jon will be stupid enough to weigh in on this. Speaking of Jon, and looking at that first screencap …
5c119c No.179170
Going full /pol/ on /cow/
b5cdf2 No.179173
>>179170
It's either /pol/, /gg/ or /nullsarapist/ depending on the mood.
5abb01 No.179177
>one of Anita's clique is a convicted child molester
>/cow/ care more about the fact that he's black than the fact that HE'S A FUCKING CHILD MOLESTER
09009a No.179178
>>179177
Sorry for the derailment.
5c119c No.179179
>>179173
It shouldn't be any of the above. It should be funny.
1d4df3 No.179181
File: 1446160201043.jpg (81.19 KB, 671x1191, 671:1191, erotic_feeling_by_jilllove….jpg)

>>179121
Well, not ALL white. I saw one black chick, lots of furry stuff, and virtually everything in that favorites list is exactly the kind of shit Anita is always bitching about.
e1a35a No.179184
>>179100
I see someone is underestimating Anita, Goddess of Snakeoil.
The woman may be a liar and cheat who works off a script by a dunce, but she is know how to keep her con safe and spin shit.
Facts have been working against her for YEARS and she is still trucking.
066d54 No.179187
>>179057
Nope. HannibalVictor13 got nailed for going after a 13-15 year old and spent some hard time for it. Look it up on the website yourself if you don't believe the image.
1a2e86 No.179190
>>179187
Man, do all local trials take this long? Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but it looks like this trial took over two years to conclude.
066d54 No.179193
>>179190
For serious crimes, they do pretty much take this long. It would have ended sooner, but he seriously fucked up his probation requirements and ended up get sent the the slammer. And then in 2008 it appears the authorities needed to get permission to dispose ceased property (probably because they didn't think they needed to keep it any longer).
aeeba1 No.179196
>>179187
>mummy paid my legal fees when I tried to molest a minor.
5c119c No.179197
>>179187
15 I wouldn't be too offended by, but 13? Jesus fuck. I'm not sure why, but that just creeps me the fuck out.
e4d0c1 No.179206
Do Sarkeesian and McIntosh fuck kids too? Just wondering.
5abb01 No.179210
>>179206
I'd be surprised if they fuck anybody, legal or not.
They've never been caught fucking kids though
aeeba1 No.179211
>>179206
Josh is busy carrying a cross for being born into privilege, and Anita is so sex negative I dont think she has genitals, so no.
5c119c No.179216
>>179210
No, they just enable.
5c119c No.179217
>>179211
I think she probably is into some kinky shit. Chicks like that usually are.
378b4c No.179218
File: 1446171639227.png (106.86 KB, 298x271, 298:271, Screen Shot 2015-10-29 at ….png)

>mfw some pedo scumbag tries to ruin one of my favorite books
5abb01 No.179219
>>179217
I'm afraid that might be wishful thinking.
09009a No.179225
Valis just deleted his DA account.
378b4c No.179226
>>179225
People are archiving this shit to send to his parole board or whatever authority oversees that kind of thing, right?
Pretty sure it won't matter if he deletes it as long as it can be shown he was breaking the rules in the first place.
5abb01 No.179227
>>179225
InB4 he inevitably complains about 'harassment'
>>179226
I certainly hope someone was smart enough to archive this shit
5abb01 No.179228
>>179227
Scratch that, we've got archives
378b4c No.179234
Just sayin' /cow/pokes it seems like these SJWs have no vetting process at all in terms of who they let get close to them. I'm surprised no one has taken advantage of that.
Either way I hope they keep attracting pedos and sex offenders for us to expose. It's pretty hilarious.
Anyone have any theories as to why these pedos choose the likes of Anita and friends to support? Could they seriously think that the SJWs will take up their cause next?
5abb01 No.179236
>>179234
>Could they seriously think that the SJWs will take up their cause next?
Possibly. Personally I think it's more like what >>179000 said. They're like Born Again Christians, they think that praying to the Gods of Social Justice will automatically absolve them of past sins.
89c550 No.179237
>>179234
People are easier to control of you have dirt on them. That's probably why so many people with shady pasts are close to high figure sjw. Being a good ass kisser is really the only prerequisite to be in the sjw clique.
378b4c No.179241
>>179236
I could see that in some cases, sure. Others might just be straight up predators and see SJWs as a bunch of naive people that they could potentially prey upon, I bet.
>>179237
I totally agree with this in theory but it assumes that they are aware of the dirt and making a deliberate choice to associate with compromised people. It doesn't seem like they know about this stuff until third parties uncover it and make them aware of it.
I think you're right that anyone who kisses ass and acts slavishly devoted to their ideals is accepted without question. They probably only research someone if there are so many red flags that they can't avoid it.
Additionally: they are masters of denial and mental gymnastics in terms of excusing vile behavior among their own. They just don't seem like the types to keep people in line with (non-emotional) blackmail (except Chelsea Van Valkenberg, I bet she loves to manipulate people with blackmail of all sorts).
09009a No.179243
Another archive:
https://archive.is/rLPkq
>>179226
Someone already send an email, but maybe more people should.
378b4c No.179244
File: 1446176396459.png (87.72 KB, 852x527, 852:527, Screen Shot 2015-10-29 at ….png)

>>179243
>click on link
What the fuck is going on in that conversation?
>lel
b48741 No.179252
>>179234
>Could they seriously think that the SJWs will take up their cause next?
Seems like it. Latest Salon article defending pedos. The pedo in the story is supposedly named Jacob but it might as well be Jarrod.
https://archive.is/gskYn#selection-2927.0-2927.270
b48741 No.179253
378b4c No.179255
>>179253
Regardless of the potential bias in the article I'm really glad that a lot of it seems to be discussing brain imaging studies and their importance in the search for a cure for pedos.
So even if the author kind of thought that Jacob wasn't a terrible guy at least he wants to cure pedos rather than just accept them and is one of the people engaged in the science to make that happen.
That's the kind of stuff we need to be talking about to keep everything in perspective so people realize that kid-diddling is never getting legalized.
5c119c No.179263
>>179255
It's unlikely we can actually change a person's wiring after he's developed said wiring. It's like saying you're going to cure autism or downs syndrome.
09009a No.179274
>>179255
You have to keep in mind that not many people want to fund research on pedophilia.
5c119c No.179290
>>179274
You'd think the church would want to at this point. Scouts to.
5abb01 No.179299
>>179290
>The Church
>funding anything to do with science
At best the Christians might run camps where you pray the paedo away, and it'll work just as well as the gay camps..
4afd69 No.179305
>>179252
There's also people like Ben Kuchera that have defended pedophiles being attracted to kids.
They try to compartmentalize the different aspects of people, like whether they raped someone or they're good at ass kissing, and downplay the negatives so that they can feel nice for being accepting of the person.
10cab6 No.179306
>>178978
>Hannibal is 5'05''
What a fucking manlet.
5c119c No.179307
>>179299
The Catholics are actually not that anti intellectual right now.
5c119c No.179308
>>179306
That's what you got out of this?
225ad5 No.179337
>>179241
>
>I could see that in some cases, sure. Others might just be straight up predators and see SJWs as a bunch of naive people that they could potentially prey upon, I bet.
That reminds me of when that sjw faggot tweeted pedobutt a pic of her daughter
Pedos always flocked (still do) to hippie communes because they knew most people there were dumb stoners who barely watched over their kids at all so it was very easy to just keep raping a little girl since even if caught a lot of them got out with the "pedophilia its an invention of the The Man to keep me down!" shit or at least thats what some of the kids said
Same with religious communities
225ad5 No.179338
>>179100
>>179100
>There is no way Anita and co can talk her way out of this. There's so much evidence that she is an ex-scam seminar conwoman
>an ex-PUA
>never played any vidya at all
>plagiarized even the video footage for her propaganda
>lied about harassment
>its lying to the IRS
Etcetera etcetera….
225ad5 No.179340
>>179234
>I'm surprised no one has taken advantage of that.
You serious? haven't you hear about this thing called patreon?
Shit! mandy harpoons was publicly tearing feminazis a new one as late as 2011 and now she is a fucking icon and getting free money off these retards ever since she pulled a 180°
If anything I say sjws are easier to con than evangelical christians these days
5abb01 No.179342
>>179340
Yeah, in fact it's pretty easy to julay them for Patreon shekels
Step 1) Be a woman or pretend to be a woman. Doesn't matter if you don't make any effort to pass, gender is a social construct and anyone who points out that you're not really a woman is a transphobic cis-het shitlord
Step 2) Create a Tumblr where you blog about your experiences as a woman/transsexual wannabe woman, in between blogging about Social Justice issues like how the Patriarchy is out to get you or how transsexuals are more likely to be raped than any other type of woman
Step 3) Complain about harassment. This is the most important part. You could fake the harassment if you're really dedicated but it doesn't really matter if you can't prove you were harassed, they'll Listen and Believe it anyway. Make sure to scream often and loudly about how you were harassed by evul misogynerds for being a strong wymyn/transwymyn
Step 4) Start a Patreon and rake in the shekels
e4d0c1 No.179344
>>179100
Correct me if I'm wrong, but she has a reputation of not responding to criticism at all, which is why I don't consider her a lolcow. I don't consider her a critic either.
It's worth knowing if Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children, though. I don't think hiring a convicted pedophile proves that Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children, but if 'Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children, it seems like they're wittingly drawing attention to themselves. It would certainly weaken their clout as "feminists" if Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children who cannot consent.
3f01c1 No.179354
>>179168
>"other" category is yellow
>mfw
I love it when they slip in subtle jokes like that
3f01c1 No.179355
>>179344
Yeah, there's no evidence that they fuck kids, but at least somebody on here is throwing baseless pedophilia accusations at any and all SJW ecelebs.
(ie, the guy who comes into every single moviebob thread to try and convince us he's a pedo).
>>179338
Is there a link to her PUA shit?
fbfa53 No.179364
Lets try to get Valis to get demodded in every chat he has mod in and get that pedo fuck banned from every website he has a account, also has anyone informed the police about his online activity yet
?
09009a No.179375
>>179355
She was also involved in handwriting seminar scams.
Oh, and Feminist Frequency is registered as both a charity and as a non-profit business, even though she announced that it became a charity in June 2014.
066d54 No.179384
>>179234
A young SJW's reaction when she finds out the nice older feminist man she was going to visit turns out to be a Pedo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRwCTw_Y2VU
066d54 No.179390
>>179306
If you can't grow up, grow out.
e5b2bf No.179395
>>179392
>There has to be a reason so fucking many of these cucks turn out to be pedophiles.
It's the same thing with harcore anti-gay conservatives actually being gay themselves and whatnot. They project their guilt onto everyone else and take a hard stance on it publicly to demonstrate just how much of a non-pedophile they totally are because they feel guilty as fuck for it but don't actually try to do anything about it.
6ea98c No.179397
>>179344
I wish McIntosh would just grow some balls and do some actual debate against people that disagree with him. It's one thing to not have Anita do it since the ideas aren't even really hers and even if they were she'd still get BFTO out since they are so flawed.
If towering intellects such as the Amazing Bananaman are able to dismantle her concepts and examples with realitive ease it pretty much creates a situation where actual debate is an automatically losing proposition. But unlike Anita Josh could debate more general ideological topics rather than just stuff directly from the videos since he can present himself as independent If he wants even though he is the real brains behind Feminazi Frequency.
I guess he figures he'd get embarrassed. Then again I'm not sure if he's in touch with reality enough to realize that. Maybe he has some other SJW "logic" that I'm unable to conjure up on my own.
5abb01 No.179407
>>179344
Unfortunately I don't think there's any evidence to suggest that Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children. There's certainly no legal paper trail that points to the fact that Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children. Were it known that Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children people would never let it be forgotten that Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children and they would be sent back to jail with a phone call for associating with other paedophiles, as Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children.
331e5c No.179414
>>179397
They did this in the 90s and lost every debate possible. Feminists learned that they can't win debates against MRAs, so they just stopped debating all together. If you lose every single debate you're in then you're going to stop doing them.
3c6561 No.179474
>>179407
I don't know why I inadvertently find this so god-damn funny
9eb948 No.179501
>>179374
lol neonandchrome.com is a virus removal scam page now
ec6c17 No.179511
>>179100
I wonder if a registered offender can get in trouble for his behaviour here? I'm not clued up on his states laws but there's a good probability that he is in contact with minors and accessing indecent images of children
5abb01 No.179513
>>179511
In the very least we might be able to get him a visit from his parole officer.
e4d0c1 No.179514
>>179407
>Unfortunately I don't think there's any evidence to suggest that Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children. There's certainly no legal paper trail that points to the fact that Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children. Were it known that Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children people would never let it be forgotten that Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children and they would be sent back to jail with a phone call for associating with other paedophiles, as Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children.
Perhaps the evidence that Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children is being buried. If Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children, they would be in the company of Valis77, srhbutts, and others who are known to fuck children. Of course, it still can't be proven that Anita Sarkeesian and Jonathan McIntosh fuck children, but the evidence may surface with time.
e317ff No.179518
>>179179
I just read all your posts and not a single one was funny.
2c787e No.179519
>>179344
I bet Mcintosh sticks to boys. Josh will do anything to remove their "toxic masculinity". Probably thinks he's helping the cause.
b8764d No.179541
>>179255
Except the cure angle will never go anywhere. The fact that similar research could possibly cure homosexuality would prevent that from happening on the basis of "homophobic mental research" or something retarded like that.
5abb01 No.179545
>>179541
That really depends. Jails are overcrowded. If it's a question of cure paedophilia or spend tons and tons of taxpayer money on building more jails to house the sex offenders, the government will probably opt for a cure and spend the money they would have spent on jails on blow and hookers instead, Gay rights activists be damned.
7afa8d No.179550
>>179100
She will do the same thing she has been doing all these years - ignore it. She ascended to sainthood to these imbeciles, I dont think there is anything that will ever stick to her unless we uncover some shit that could land them (as in Josh and Anita) personally in jail.
8673ce No.179560
>>179541
This, pretty much, start of a slippery slope for leftists….
1d4df3 No.179563
>>179550
The only real option is to quietly remove him as a moderator and never talk about it. To be honest I'm surprised she didn't vet these guys more, given how obsessed with image she is.
Maybe she'll learn from this and start taking a better look at her associates. If any of them suddenly drop off the radar in the near future, there's probably some dirt there too.
78f851 No.179572
>>179105
he moderated a board (openly and honestly, there are screenshots about him talking about it with much regard) called /pedo/ and you think he's not a pedo?
even if he is an autopedophile which is exactly what michael jackson was, he is still at risk of molesting kids
78f851 No.179579
Liberals
>accuse us of being the pedos
>probably make up 99% of the pedophiles on /b/
519072 No.179608
>>179579
14 year old edge lords make up 99.9 percent, so I don't think their political leanings are really that set in stone.
519072 No.179609
>>179545
There aren't that many sex offenders, let alone pedophiles. Plus they just love spending money.
09009a No.179610
>>179551
Some people think that castration would help, but you can still molest and rape children if you don't have a penis.
5c119c No.179622
>>179610
Plus eunuchs can still get erections.
fee3b8 No.179642
>>179545
You act like that's by accident and not design; more prison labour for their corporate buddies? Sign that fucken bill
>>179572
Weird thing about Michael Jackson is that it's more or less impossible to tell whether he actually was a pedophile or just completely fucked up about children and sex in an unrelated way. Though my money would be on the latter; he's almost too obvious.
Didn't help that he was basically surrounded by people who made it their jobs to ensure his downward spiral.
ec6c17 No.179667
>>179551
Trannies and cross dressers have been cured with a certain medication but the repercussions of curing trannydom may see similar work on homosexuality so can't have that doesnt fit the agenda
5a6098 No.179703
>>179642
The evidence suggests and his general mannerism suggest that Michael Jackson was a regressive pedophile.
b9ebaf No.185886
This probably belongs in this thread:
https://youtu.be/0EMQqDXG218
It's by the same guy who did the Nick Nyberg videos. He explains how Valis is tied to Feminist Frequency. Valis has probably seen it, since he makes subtle references to it in these videos:
https://youtu.be/FuBpGC8iVhU
https://youtu.be/bvQbBVW_G4A
Someone's salty.
225ad5 No.185929
>>179184
THIS
Friendly reminder that before cashing on SJW anita was:
>a scam seminar promoter (her boss went to jail)
>a shitty fortune teller
>an organizer for crap spiritual trips
>a PUA until 2010
Then in 2012 she launched her kickstarter which was her testing the waters to see if dumbfucks in the SJW world would take the bait
And they fucking did
4d050a No.185941
>>179667
Preytell, what is this treatment?
645f05 No.186045
>>185886
>Valis has probably seen it, since he makes subtle references to it in these videos
21cd21 No.186056
>>179414
any sauce on their debates?
e88036 No.186060
>>186045
>you look stupid doing it
and what does he look like, riding his bike around near an elementary school saying shit like "I just got away with murder!" because he's a registered sex offender.
4b952f No.186578
>>179299
That's actually not entirely true. Copnericus was actually a Catholic monk when he proposed his sun centered universe theory. He only got persecuted ten years after he published his findings. Plus a Jesuit established the reason why the moon moved slower than a comet (Galileo actually mocked him for it despite the fact Galileo was dead wrong). Galileo was a practicing Catholic after he got put on house arrest. His persecution was him being a huge sperg to his best friend the pope and calling the pope a moron in his book repeatedly. The pope was trying to help him at the time. But that's a different topic.
I'm not how and why Anita picked Valis for a mod. Diversity maybe? Either way she knew about his past and didn't care about it or didn't and wanted a lapdog. Either option makes Anita look incompetent. I really hope a major news outlet calls them out eventually.
1d4df3 No.186591
>>186578
The news media never admits when it's wrong. It picks an angle and never veers from it. So it will be with Anita.
Valis himself will be caught again, because he is obviously unrepentant about his previous escapades and he is on video flirting with his friend's underage daughter. It's only a matter of time.