/cow/ - Lolpigs

http://archive.is/e84g6

Also noteworthy – it's an archive from 2008 of his blog.

Come on, OP! Step it up; Grab all his Nexuiz Maps!

don't forget where he was originally advertising his shit Xonotic fork game back on both /lv/ and /tech/ before occasionally running off to /v/

>>188145

I guess we've all seen this shilled on /n/ too

>>187946

>the wall textures are actually 100% factual and real

>he's fucked in the head guyz it's stupid shit

So now we have a progressive stack/goons on /cow/?

If anything's "stupid shit" it's shit like pic 2 in the OP, not anything you're posting in this post.

>>188350

Glad to see you've made it, MikeeUSA.

Can have more wall textures. Plz?

Hey Op, let's see your videogame or mod!

Especially take screenshots of walls, that's what we're interested in!

>>188593

He found his thread.

>He found his thread.

Given that op posted it in my /v/ thread immediately after creating it 2 days ago, finding the thread was not… too difficult.

But you're a superior intellect and I clearly inferior, so it is amazing that I found the thread.

So, lets see your mod or game… in freedom.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111112222222222222222

As Christmas approaches the Team has worked furiously to prepare an early gift!

Since last release we have been focusing on the buildable building system for the most part. Many new pieces of furniture have been added to the game, both for the medieval multitool and the futuristic utilitool, aswell as additional building pieces.

Info: http://lgdb.org/game/chaosesque-anthology

Download: http://sourceforge.net/projects/chaosesqueanthology/files/latest/download

The multitool boasts additional wooden chairs, tables, and benches, aswell as a plush chaise lounge, plus workshop items such as a workshop table, a forge, an anvil, bellows (which ignite the forge if in close proximity), aswell as greek and roman columns (which can be set to normal texture or one of many marble materials). On the non-furnishings side there has been added domed roofs, aswell as an additional castle stone option: pink stone bricks; now you can build moscvy.

Our futuristic building tool, the Utilitool, now brings additonal metal chairs, tables, and other items such as filing cabinets and bookshelves. There are more options than ever for building.

Thus once you build or capture a building you can make it your home or base location and kit it out as you see fit.

That is not the full spectrum of additions for this release, however, there has been a new mounted gun added: The Siege Mortar. This weapon is similar in range to the medieval Charbelcher but is made of iron rather than copper or bronze, and fires a heavy explosive shell. When the multitool is not set to medieval only mode this weapon will spawn in-place of the battering ram when siege workshops are built.

Additionally more wealth items have been added to the game: bullion bars, faux (counterfeit) bars, cut glass "gems" (to supplement the real gems).

Enjoy!

Info: http://lgdb.org/game/chaosesque-anthology

Download: http://sourceforge.net/projects/chaosesqueanthology/files/latest/download

I hope you enjoy it, and I hope all SJWs and feminists die.

Marry little girls.

Kill feminists.

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

Also see: Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew allows men to rape girl children and keep them: thus man + girl is obviously fine. Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy. It is wonderful when this happens from time to time: celebrate)

>>188597

Don't the ten commandments say something about killing?

>>188599

>Don't the ten commandments say something about killing?

Nope. The OT isn't written in english.

http://lexiconcordance.com/hebrew/7523.html

1) to murder, slay, kill

1a) (Qal) to murder, slay

1a1) premeditated

1a2) accidental

1a3) as avenger

1a4) slayer (intentional) (participle)

1b) (Niphal) to be slain

1c) (Piel)

1c1) to murder, assassinate

1c2) murderer, assassin (participle)(subst)

1d) (Pual) to be killed

The OT isn't written in english. The word means to murder. Killing as commanded by other commandments (such as when someone entices you too follow another ruler/judge/god) is demanded.

And what do feminists do when they demand we follow the rule of their countries? Their judges? Their belief system?

(Which is in contradiction to laws such as Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew, which allows men to rape girl children and keep them)

When their enforcement officers do their job?

Why they entice us to follow a ruler/judge/god other than that of the book of Deuteronomy…

And what does said book say about that?

It says to kill such people.

So… your understanding of one commandment… is just simply not nuanced. But that is to be expected if you did not study the original words and rely only on the translation.

The drawings in the child abusers in this post look interesting. Can you post them?

>>187946

>implying the personal army is being en massed here and you're not just falling for the distraction

we will come to cut off your penis and steal more of your rights you MRA cispig

thank god someone noticed him. he is really obnoxious in /gobblegatehg/ and /tech/

Heh, I've been expecting a /cow/ MikeeUSA thread.

What you should know about him:

1) He hates not only SJWs but women in general. A bit like /r9k/ but angrier.

2) He wants to marry little girls in the way that is written in the Old Testament.

3) He'll shill his game everywhere. I've seen threads by him in /b/, /v/, /lv/, /tech/, /n/, etc.

That's it. He'll be obnoxious as possible about any of those things.

How to julay the lulz:

1) Say you're a woman or a SJW.

2) Call him a pedo or say that marrying kids is wrong.

3) Say his game is shit or that you love systemd.

He's bretty autistic so julaying him is so easy it might kill the fun. But go ahead if you want, you'll have guaranteed replies.

>>188620

looks like a boy tbh

>>188633

Also, he wants to kill anyone who disagrees with him.

This guy seems totally insane.

But I cant help but like him.

Hes like one of those feminazis who always blames men for everything.

Except he blames feminists for everything.

Plus he has actually made a game.

Gotta respect that.

>>188637

You forgot that he hates the New Testament and Jesus

>>188638

He's a talented autist. But he didn't make the game from scratch, it's a mod for Nexuiz.

>>188640

He's a bit like Terry Davis. Except a little less crazy.

>>188639

So he's a jew?

>>188641

>Terry

>crazy

Found the CIA nigger

>>188641

Terry Davis is usually a nice person, and he made his operating system and programming language completely from scratch. I respect him.

>>188643

no, he doesn't follow the Talmud

he's a Yahwehist

>>188645

Yeah, I respect him as well but sometimes he goes buttmad insane about muh CIA nigger and muh Bible. That said, both MikeeUSA and Terry Davis are talented nutjobs. Terry Davis is probably more talented since making an OS is a lot of work but MikeeUSA's Nexuiz fork seems pretty neat despite the autism of its creator (I haven't played it though, only seen some screenshots and a description).

>>188620

>>188619

>>188617

>>188614

>>188610

>>188607

>>188605

>>188601

>>188601

>>188600

>>188597

>>188594

>>188591

>>188588

>>188587

>>188586

>>188585

>>188583

>>188582

>>188581

>>188578

>>188577

>>188576

>>188575

>>188574

>>188572

Sex with children is wrong for it is against the general aim of having quality offspring and normal people, especially if they are in position of leadership, will never ever understand the urge to fuck kids!

Here's an idea for a new weapon in your game.

Instead of a gun, it's a feminist that you're using as a human shield. When you click the fire button, you bring up a knife and slash her throat, then you throw her on the ground and jizz into the gash in her trachea.

Secondary fire: you use a reverse-aging ray gun to turn her into an 11-year-old girl, marry her, and bust the shit out of her hymen.

Might be a little overpowered, but it's a pretty sweet idea imho

Kill all feminists

>>188675

>You are a pedophile.

You cannot take the title before taking the crown.

I'd marry a girl child if I could, but women and their governments

have banned this the world over.

> Do you not see you are killing any chance of your project succeeding by being a kike?

The game I wanted now exists, because I made it exist; from the

fork of Nexuiz that took the image of the phoenix for its symbol,

I made what I wished take flight.

This project has succeeded.

The greatest treasure is that seen by few.

>>188682

Excuse me:

http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/the-theory-2/

Humans are in general K-selected and fucking early is counter productive to this very characteristic. If you pedo you are either regressing, because your childhood was abnormal mess or you are r-type faggit opportunist. Besides, getting the responsebillities of Sex slapped on their shoulders fucks Kids up. Normal people will therefor always think that it is sick, disgusting, destructive towards the children, the very persons have invested so much into, and it is therefor evil.

Have you ever left your basement?

>>188687

>Didn't your parents raise you better than this, Mike?

Gotta be careful what religious literature one hands to one's children. If the bible is laying around one might just investigate the original writings. It's always a danger. History shows that the world wasn't always a cunt's paradise, but a man's world.

>Mike you gotta get your shit together, Mike

No incentive to do so.

>Get your shit together

Incentive went out the window when cunts banned men from marrying cute young girls.

>>188689

Save your bullshit for some other asexual, woman, or faggot.

Young girls are cute. That's why men always married them over older bitches (unless the older cunt was rich) through all of history.

If I were running the show I'd have your fingers cut off and then you burned alive for enticing others to follow your feminism. Others would think twice before following suit, anyone who already showed their colours would be killed.

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

Also see: Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew allows men to rape girl children and keep them: thus man + girl is obviously fine. Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy. It is wonderful when this happens from time to time: celebrate)

Marry Fuck Kill:

1) 75-year-old black woman

2) Seven-year-old white boy

3) 10-year-old Afghan girl who is also a radical feminist

>>188693

>3) 10-year-old Afghan girl who is also a radical feminist

"Marry them by 8, before it's too late"

I hope they take another swing at Mala Yousef.

Miike, I slowly begin to see why the Open Source community threw you out and then treated your contributions like the rags of a sinner.

Whenever someone tells you that your world view is abnormal and insane, you are doubling down on your sperg theories instead of investing one impulse of your imbecilic brain into the idea that you are maybe wrong and your whacky ideas are a product of self imposed captivity. Ever seen Zoo animals doing these weird moves? They don't do it because they are retarded, but because the Hikkikomori lifestyle was forced upon them by their caregivers and owners.

Your diatribe is the equivalent of weaving. With that dealt with, I repeat again: Fucking children is not normal. 99% of mankind will never understand the urge to do so, let alone accept it.

>>188675

>CIA Rises

>He didn't die so good.

He didn't die so well.

He didn't die so well.

>Miike, I slowly begin to see why the Open Source community threw you out and then treated your contributions like the rags of a sinner.

I like my game.

I like how I made it mine, after seeing nexuiz, going into it's orbit, being taught the ways by the guys, child abuserping, then texture, then coding QC.

Opensource is great. It allows people like me to do this sort of thing.

And I think, maybe, when people look back, they regret they ever contributed to an opensource project. They think that they were young and idealistic, and maybe only thought the correct people they would be associated with… or thought that they wouldn't care themselves even if others joined (which they were sure woudn't happen).

I wonder if there is regret, and a wish to take things back.

But I am never giving it back.

This is only one way.

It comes here. I have it now.

>>188696

>Your diatribe is the equivalent of weaving. With that dealt with, I repeat again: Fucking children is not normal. 99% of mankind will never understand the urge to do so, let alone accept it.

Which is why child brides were fine in all of chrisendom, all of islam, all of the vedic lands…

Until women gained political sway:

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

Funny how that happened, and how it happens the same in every cuntry.

>99 percent.

It was better for men who liked young girls when kings reigned rather than democracy where women reign. 52% of the population will never agree that men should fuck females younger than themselves, you are correct in that.

The solution is to remove them from power and kill anyone that wishes to reinstate their reign. The 99 percent can be brought into line.

>Miike, I slowly begin to see why the Open Source community threw you out and then treated your contributions like the rags of a sinner.

They are faggots that believe more in women's liberty than "opensource" etc. I would love to have every single one of those who treat what I've worked on as "the rags of a sinner" burned alive without a stake as the faggots that they are. Remeber when they were touting that opensource was a "meritocracy"?

Well fucking cunts who package shit are given great respect while those who actually write or build the software and media are spit on if they oppose the cunts. (Similar things can be seen in the systemd debate: the faggots who just package crap won out over the old hackers who built the debian distribution in the first place)

Also I do not have to contribute to any fucking project. Every time you open-license your work you are contributing to me you fucking piece of shit (you are thanked for your hard work)

>>188696

I will celebrate upon your death you fucking SJW anti-marry young girl piece of shit.

ESR is the only opensource proponent that stays true to the ideal of meritocracy (maybe RMS and Linus too). Everyone else has uncloaked themselves as merely proponents of whatever leftist belief system is in vogue.

esr.ibiblio.org/?p=1310

>>188697

>>>/bane/

what is even going on in this thread anymore lol

So, I think we've all seen how fucking crazy this guy is and how easy it is to provoke a reaction out of him.

Apologies if this was brought to any front pages and wasn't entirely worthy of being so, if at all.

I think we can all agree though that mike here has quite a bit of potential.

>>188705

No.

I'd marry the girls.

All posted were 8 or below.

> An Afghan girl stares at Warrant Officer Troy D. Anstine, executive officer, Headquarters and Service Company, 1st Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, as he explains her coloring assignment at the school near Forward Operating Base Geronimo March 31. She cautiously entered the school compound after the dodgeball game and is the first girl to attend class at the school. Marines said they hope to encourage more girls from the area to attend class in the future. Photo by Sgt. Brian Tuthill

>

> Just before the game had finished, an 8-year-old girl arrived to the school with three other young boys, who quickly joined the group of students while she kept her distance outside the compound.

>

> After the game, the school\u2019s Pashto interpreter returned and students went back to their studies. They recited and wrote Pashto numbers and then took on coloring assignments requiring them to pair the numbers to colors and color in the appropriate areas. The girl slowly and cautiously made her way into the compound and joined the class already in session.

>

> \u201cWe were so excited to have our first female student,\u201d said Anstine. \u201cShe was scared at first, but I think she had a good time. I hope we will see more girls come to school and start their education.\u201d

Thus not a "10 yr old radical feminist"

Which by said poster was an obvious reference to Mala Yousef

(though she was 14 at the time of being shot)

Always the SJWs conflate man+girl with homosexuality.

That is because there is nothing wrong with man + girl.

>>188713

Don't pat yourself on the back yet, SJW.

I did all the work in this thread.

>>188717

Please carry on. You clearly understand the very reason for this board's existence.

>>188713

ask him about his fake law degree.

>>188716

I'm starting to think Mike is only obsessed with little girls because he knows women won't touch him, so he has to prey on innocence and ignorance.

What a fag lol

>>188675

>Goons need to leave. This is the board about making fun of people but it's still 8chan.

No, fuck off. Making fun of tards shouldn't have any political barriers.

Lulz > politics

This guy is fucking insane holy shit.

Mike your game is shit, you accomplished nothing.

>>188809

i.e. he is a opportunistic r-type faggot who wouldn't mind sneaking up your GF if he could.

I like my game :).

>but TBH fam your game looks like complete shit.

>Mike your game is shit, you accomplished nothing.

Lets see what you've made.

I've been waiting months for any one of you to post your works.

Nothing.

As I've said before: I'm not a faggot so I don't really overly care how the game looks: I'm not into fashion. I'm not going to obsess over details.

The game has 90 weapons, 30 spells, over 100 child abusers, many vehicles, mounted guns, city generation, build-able buildings.

If on obsessed over a texture, for instance, none of that would exist.

Besides, Opensource games rarely look the best, but they often have more options and superior gameplay (enjoy your proprietary rail shooters: any of which are inferior to things like the text based nethack).

The reason you dislike the game, we all know, however, is because I oppose your values (women's rights) and am in-favor of something you hate (men marrying female children, as is tradition). You would say nothing otherwise.

Don't know what all your r-type intellectual faggot bullshit is about. Young girls are often very cute and sweet, the God of Deuteronomy is fine with men having them, and so was the rest of the world prior to the women's movement.

Feminists should be killed.

Young girls should be brides.

>>188836

I notice you have not posted a screenshot from your game or m_ap.

Why is this?

Anything you faggots post is something you had no part in producing.

That's really all that needs to be said.

>>188891

>>188892

that's a retarded argument, you don't have to be a chief to know when a meal is bad and the same can be said for video games

can you come up with an argument point that's not a strawman

>>188893

I bet you think chocolate cake tastes like shit or that nethack is unfun.

But electric blue cleaning solution, must be great, scarf that down!

No, it is not a retarded argument: you don't do, I do.

You don't make shit. You can't talk.

It's like a piece of shit like you criticizing architecture.

Way back when, your limbs would have been shattered on the wheel

for libel, and your fingers cut off and your tounge cut out,

since you were NOT an architect or stone mason and could

not build anything you were criticizing.

You haven't even downloaded the game so shut your fucking mouth.

And if you had any achievement to show, any work you have done,

you would have shown it.

I love it when people like you are killed (pro-feminist do-nothings).

I celebrate every time it happens.

I was so happy when my prayer to the God of the book of Deuteronomy

came true, almost to the letter.

Hey, you pedorapist. Don't you have something more important to protest, like Sonic's arm colors or the Washington Redskins name?

>>188899

Pro marry-young girl is paleo-conservative/revanchist, not liberal.

It was liberal cunts who banned it in the first place you fucking idiot.

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

Also see: Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew allows men to rape girl children and keep them: thus man + girl is obviously fine. Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy. It is wonderful when this happens from time to time: celebrate)

BTW: post what you make.

Nothing?

Thought so.

Autist is code word for "non-commercial programmer" here it seems.

Or anyone that produces anything.

>>188904

you mudslime, words on a bit of paper doesn't give you any rights

I don't get why people are complaining OP is goon SJW infiltrator. The guy is seriously fucked in the head, how can you miss out on this gem?

>>188908

>you mudslime, words on a bit of paper doesn't give you any rights

Deuteronomy is in the Old Testament, idiot.

>>188910

Why did you imagine I wouldn't find someone mentioning me? How did that thought enter your head?

Mock me all you wish: I do more than you.

What have you built? What do you do?

We'll never know.

The grass mocks the tree, for the grass is many.

>>188919

Well, dunno, I guess I expected you to have SOME semblance of life instead of searching for mentions of your name on every single board.

And geez, you are even more funny than Seattle4Truth with his conspirofag chimpouts in his own thread. Enjoy defending your lunatic screeds and shoddy games, I'm sure those are worth defending on an anonymous imageboard :^)

>>188919

Well, dunno, I guess I expected you to have SOME semblance of life instead of searching for mentions of your name on every single board.

And geez, you are even more funny than Seattle4Truth with his conspirofag chimpouts in his own thread. Enjoy defending your lunatic screeds and shoddy games, I'm sure those are worth defending on an anonymous imageboard :^)

I love how the only person defending this shitty mod for Nexuiz or whatever it's called is Mike himself.

I also love how most, if not all of his child abusers are lacking textures in several areas and have no real place in an arena shooter.

Face it man.

Your game sucks ass.

Mike, why do you pretend to be a lawyer on the internet?

>>188919

Mike you fucking durka the old testament doesn't mean shit Jesus sacrifice formed a new covenant between man and god, the old testament is just for history and context.

I think systemd is very useful.

>>188904

>Pro-marry young girl

>It's paleoconservative, so that makes it halal

Sure, you keep saying that. You and Nick Bate ought to have coffee.

I do enjoy playing seemingly bizarre games tons of strange things in them, I'll probably try to check the game out tomorrow. Hopefully it'll bring me back to the days of exploring Worlds back in 2010 or whenever it was.

What can I expect other than shooting guns and spells?

>>188978

>The game has 90 weapons, 30 spells, over 100 child abusers, many vehicles, mounted guns, city generation, build-able buildings.

After you've played it, please come back and explain what the fuck he meant by, "over 100 child abusers."

>After you've played it, please come back and explain what the fuck he meant by, "over 100 child abusers."

m_a_p (without the _s) is filtered into "child abusers"

>>188957

>Mike you fucking durka the old testament doesn't mean shit Jesus sacrifice formed a new covenant between man and god, the old testament is just for history and context.

There is a clause in matthew where it is said not one iota of the law is gone before the heavens and the earth are gone.

Otherwise:

Anyway, Jesus was a heretic, as were his followers, if they rejected the laws in Deuteronomy, and so are you.

>>188954

>Mike, why do you pretend to be a lawyer on the internet?

I don't pretend to be a lawyer on the internet.

I have a J.D.

You do not. Yet you think you know more about the law than I.

>>188978

>What can I expect other than shooting guns and spells?

You can build towns, castles, and buildings if you wish using the multitool (medeval) and/or utilitool (futuristic), a hammer is recommended. You can set the cost and time to nothing if you wish in the weapons menu. You can have citys generated (like a 3d sim city, with interiors to the buildings) (mutators, sctiles etc), use vehicles, etc.

Here's a rundown:

>That's cool, dude, but why should I play your mod?

It's fun on a lan and offers sufficient features that you can play out the scenario you wish.

There are per-team starting weapons, *spells, *vehicles, *grenades,landmines, etc

There are over 80 weapons, which include medeval, modern, and futuristic.

There are WWI, fururistic, and medeval mounted guns.

There are WWI era, medeval, and futuristic vehicles.

There are medeval, modern, and futuristic monsters.

There is RTS style buildable buildings (medeval: multitool, futuristic: utilitool).

There is SimCity-Esque city generation.

There are Sonic-style bumpers, baloons, spike chain balls, and spikes.

There is a foliage system.

These can all be spawned in at the begining of a match, including just on one side for city, foliage, monsters, etc (think gate)

There's nuclear weapons that can wreck the cities and buildings.

There are jails and medeval chambers (need shackless weapon to capture)

There are miniguns and gau guns etc.

So you can set up whatever scenario you want to play against your friends. Like the HTML of FPS match making.

You don't have to code your own game to do it. The options are allready there.

Mike you are fucking insane, seek help.

>>188972

OT isn't muslim. Muslim law doesn't allow men to rape girl children and keep them. Muslims kill rapists. They are egalitarian feminists compared to Deuteronomy.

However some muslim people, such as some afghan tribes, do follow that law in Deuteronomy in practice.

Also there is nothing wrong with cute young white muslim girls from northern afghanistan. Nothing wrong at all.

>>188987

Were the men that wrote the book of Deuteronomy insane?

How does it feel that the "insane" has a J.D. and works on an expansive libre videogame/mod, while you have and do neither?

Pretty pathetic of you, innit?

>>188987

Were the men that wrote the book of Deuteronomy insane?

How does it feel that the "insane" has a J.D. and works on an expansive libre videogame/mod, while you have and do neither?

Pretty pathetic of you, innit?.

>>188983

> m_a_p (without the _s) is filtered into "child abusers"

Cool beans, I'd never seen that filter before. You really should consider implementing the 100 child abusers though.

Got nothing more to say, SJW piece of shit?

>>188993

I think you're just frustated because you don't know how to use systemd.

>>188994

>I think you're just frustated because you don't know how to use systemd.

Systemd users don't know how to write shell scripts. I don't need systemd. I don't need it's bugs. I don't need it's greater CPU usage. And it's basically a root kit built by a faggot that is infavor of women's rights and proudly so.

>>188992

I hope you enjoy the game, also DVD papers (stickies and DVD case jackets) are available here if you like to make things real.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/chaoseesquesupplemental/files/dvdcase/dvdpaper.zip/download

Best to print out on glossy paper.

>>188953

>I also love how most, if not all of his child abusers are lacking textures in several areas and have no real place in an arena shooter.

The only places lacking textures are in Agressor (not my child abuser) on a small piece of floor, and some faces deep down within darkhold.

Unless your vidcard can't decompress .dds files, but I haven't hit in to that problem in a decade.

Show sshots of spots with missing textures. I'll file them and maybe if I'm adding to a child abuser might fix them, aslong as it's not your vid card and drivers at fault.

Also all my child abusers deserve a place in MY mod.

Do you have a mod/game?

Nope.

Why is m_a_p_s filtered?

>>188995

But sysvinit was created by Miquel van Smoorenburg, who is part of Debian. Aren't they SJWs?

>>189001

>But sysvinit was created by Miquel van Smoorenburg, who is part of Debian. Aren't they SJWs?

SysV predates Debian, and Debian only became SJW midway through it's existence (when they removed the "hot girls" package, kicked out Ted Walther, and instituted debian-women: early-middle first decade of 2000)

Why don't yall be a bro and download the game.

Why don't you like these girls:

>>188694

>>188620

>>188682

Give reasons.

How do you feel about failed Infinity Next migration? Some people feel good about it and are glad the migration failed.

>>189008

Eight-year-olds don't have tits. Half of them look like they will have hirsutism. Eight-year-olds don't have tits. The one in the second picture looks like Dave Mustaine which kind of creeps me out. Eight-year-olds don't have tits.

There. Six reasons.

>>188993

So like

why is it everyone who disagrees with you is an SJW? I'm legitimately curious here.

Are you unable to fathom that people disagree with you and/or dislike your work?

Hey Mikey, you say that you pray to the God of Deuteronomy.

Does he ever say anything back?

Also, do you think that the matriarchy might be spying on you or reading your posts?

>>188676

I'd actually play it if MikeeUSA added that weapon.

>>188773

Oh fug, I had forgotten about that one.

>tfw I further read the rest of the thread

The autism has been unleashed. As a pedo, I tell you this MikeeUSA: raping little girls is not a good thing and neither is child mariage. Let them have their fucking childhood for fuck's sake. If you truly think that hurting a loli should be acceptable, you do not deserve to be called a pedo, only a cowardly rapist that is too afraid to rape an adult.

>>189018

>So like

>why is it everyone who disagrees with you is an SJW? I'm legitimately curious here.

Because they all are opposed to men marrying female children.

They are thusly SJWs, banning such things was one of the first victories of the progrssive movement:

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

I can't tell you why they are that though, but every single one of them just happens to be of that stripe, without exception, so far.

They wouldn't say a peep about the game if I was a feminist piece of shit like themselves.

They have yet to show any of their own work.

>8 year olds don't have tits

So? Adult white females often don't have much either. The white man is not in-need of exaggerated features because his female has very low testosterone. The young girls are very cute, playful, and sweet. This is sufficent. In time they will have tits too, however there will only be a small window where they are both cute and have "tits", after that they will be a fully fleged woman, gradually lose their cuteness, lose their sweetness, and just become cunts that make children (playtime's over, job to do) all the whilst hating you… but they'll still have those tits.

It's better to have the young girl than the old bitch. You aren't given a choice under women's rule (democracy)

>>189041

>The autism has been unleashed. As a pedo, I tell you this MikeeUSA: raping little girls is not a good thing and neither is child mariage. Let them have their fucking childhood for fuck's sake. If you truly think that hurting a loli should be acceptable, you do not deserve to be called a pedo, only a cowardly rapist that is too afraid to rape an adult.

You are incorrect. The God spoken of in the book of Deuteronomy disagrees with you (see: Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew allows men to rape girl children and keep them: thus man + girl is obviously fine. Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy. It is wonderful when this happens from time to time: celebrate))

Chrisendom didn't ban men marrying girl children until it morphed fully into femdom:

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

The word pedophile didn't exist 200 or 300 years ago. It is a newly coined word. Only pedarast existed (male homosexuals after boys (all male homosexuals are after boys)), man + girl did not have a word. Then the adversary decided man+girl had to go.

Use the language of the enemy, you become the enemy, as we can see in your post.

>>189019

>Hey Mikey, you say that you pray to the God of Deuteronomy.

>Does he ever say anything back?

Never a word. But I never prayed for words.

I prayed for a woman police officer in afghanistan, who was driven to work each day by her brother, to experience the following:

One day a guy on a motorcycle driving by machine gun her to death with a Mac-10 and then shoot up the legs of her idiot brother to warn him (I prayed that he not die, but she die, he just get his legs shot up). I prayed specifically to the God of Deuteronomy, recognized him as the War God (that's what he was in early hebrew belief).

About two months later guys on a motorcycle drove up to the afghan police woman and her brother. They shot the woman until she was dead, they then shot up the legs of the idiot brother, as a warning, but did not kill him. They used an AK.

The only difference was the type of weapon used. The motorcycle was there. The woman was killed. The brother was not. The brother was shot in his legs as a warning.

Later there was another problem I had, I prayed in the same way to the same God, but less specifically, but that the problem be removed. The problem was removed 1 week later.

In neither prayer did I ask for something good to happen to someone. I asked for something bad to happen. It was against people that one would think the God of the book of Deuteronomy would perhaps have a disliking to.

Those are the two times I made a specific prayer to that God. He does say do not use his name in vain. Those prayed against seemed to be those he would not like.

Usually I do a generic prayer to God for the day prayers, but not address it very specifically, and not ask for anything very specific.

So no: he's never spoken to me in words. Not words.

>>189040

>>188773

I have a J.D.

It's not fake. Went to school for a handful of years to get it.

Why don't you like these girls:

>>188694

>>188620

>>188682

Give reasons.

I notice SJW faggot has not raised the personal army he wished.

Maybe next time you wish to mock someone:

1) Have something better to show than absolutely nothing.

Why should anyone take the side of a do-nothing SJW piece of shit Vs someone who produces libre software?

Maybe other do-nothing SJW pieces of shit, but that amounts to nothing but a pile of SJW pieces of shit.

I assume you've abandoned this thread by now, seeing that you have failed. Can't stick to anything can you. Fucking piece of shit.

"Guize Guize Guize there is this Guy that is against cunt rights and pro marry young girls, LOLZZZZZ, what a piece of shit, AM I RITE???? LOLZZzzz GUize! And he makes this mod !!! Guize isn't that funny !!!! Lol!!!!"

Great pitch.

>>189150

So, can you show me some definitive proof that I'm your SJW boogeyman?

Not wanting to diddle kids doesn't make anyone an SJW.

I haven't said anything on the subject other than "holy shit mike you are fucking crazy" and "holy shit mike your mod fucking sucks"

>>189158

>Why should anyone take the side of a do-nothing SJW piece of shit Vs someone who produces libre software

what's the difference

look at debian lmao

there's literally no difference from either side there

>>189157

>not a woman

>not 2D

>not delicious brown

there

>>189158

If only you knew, Mikey.

If only you knew.

>Not wanting to diddle kids doesn't make anyone an SJW.

Supporting the ban of men marrying female children absolutely makes someone a feminist.

It is one of the very first (and most important) victory the women's movement achived.

So yes, you are an SJW.

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

Learn history, piece of shit. You are an SJW feminist piece of shit.

>So, can you show me some definitive proof that I'm your SJW boogeyman?

You oppose men marrying female children and support the suppression

of the practice world wide.

Proof:

>Not wanting to diddle kids doesn't make anyone an SJW.

—–

>look at debian lmao

>there's literally no difference from either side there

Was using debian before they went pro-women.

It was a boys club before the cunts noticed it.

One year suddenly all linux distros went pro-women.

Debian-Women created.

Hot Girls pkg got removed from debian, Ted Walther was kicked out,

How's it going new faggot.

>>189260

If Jesus rejects Deuteronomy, then yes he was a heretic. If you reject Deut, then yes you are a heritic.

I'm not saying Jesus rejected Deuteronomy. Good pro-feminist Christians do though. In the middle ages there were other interpretations of the New Testament to avoid feminism and cunt rights.

Matthew has a clause that has Jesus saying till the heavens and earth are no more, not one iota of the Law shall be abolished.

The love your neighbor stuff is in Deuteronomy, alot of what is in the NT is just an obvious rehash to anyone that has even glanced at the OT. But alot of the NT also seems to be a rejection of the OT.

Anyway, prayers to the God of Deuteronomy have worked the 2 times I asked. Prayers to the god of the NT? …. … …

>>189184

Fuck you. Not liking girls is disgusting.

"women only for me, I don't like cute young girls"

Mikey, tell me about your mother.

TELL ME ABOUT MIKE

WHY DOES HE DIDDLE THE KIDS

LOTTA AUTISM FOR A MOD DEVELOPER

>>189282

you don't get to bring memes.

>>189282

Autism:

(1) The ability to focus on a task.

(2) Holding beliefs in opposition to the recieved norm.

(3) Finding some young girls cute.

(4) Not being a Social Justice Warrior / Feminist.

>>189280

Not fat.

Not short.

Not non-white.

Not bland coloured eyes.

Not lacking an advanced degree such as a J.D.

Not "diddling" girls: you banned that 100 years ago.

along with everything else men might like since then.

Try again SJW piece of shit

(and yes, those opposed to men marrying young girls are

SJWs: this was one of the first and greatest achievements

of feminism)

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

Also see: Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew allows men to rape girl children and keep them: thus man + girl is obviously fine. Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy. It is wonderful when this happens from time to time: celebrate)

Why don't you like these girls:

>>188694

>>188620

>>188682

>tfw the lolcow bumps its own thread

This is the potential we were talking about. We'll need all of /cow/ here to handle this one.

DL the game:

Info: http://lgdb.org/game/chaosesque-anthology

Download: http://sourceforge.net/projects/chaosesqueanthology/files/latest/download

DL the game:

Info: http://lgdb.org/game/chaosesque-anthology

Download: http://sourceforge.net/projects/chaosesqueanthology/files/latest/download

.

>>189343

He's not particularly funny though, just obnoxious.

At least Robb had fantastic meltdowns. This guy's just acting like an oblivious cunt.

Holy shit this guy is cringeworthy as fuck.

"Post your game!"

"MUH 2,000 YEAR OLD SANDNIGGER BOOK!"

"MUH FEMENISTS!"

I'm also an Antifeminist but goddamn, I don't hate women or condone diddling kids.

Saying "Do you have a game?" Is a stupid as shit argument. I've written and had stories published, and I've played multiple lead roles in local theatre. I don't say "Post your performances" or "did YOU publish a short story?" to critics, I learn from criticism to become better. And I also don't waste my time arguing with guys on /cow/ and making shitty game with about child-abusing walls.

>>189343

I think >>189365 makes a valid point here.

This guy is probably gonna burn out soon unless he does something spectacular, or someone uncovers something spectacular that he did.

The most that pedo mongoloid is going to do is shit up the thread until it gets deleted or something.

He's pretty much concrete in his delusions and he doesn't really see any other line of reasoning but his own.

He reads posts but doesn't fully comprehend them, so it's fine to just openly shittalk him like above.

Maybe if he made a decent mod though, people wouldn't shit on him as hard I think.

>>189340

Read >>189184 you retard.

Not only did I already answer this, but you already replied to my answer.

Sorry that i have superior taste to you :^)

>>189376

>This guy is probably gonna burn out soon unless he does something spectacular, or someone uncovers something spectacular that he did.

Been going along fine for a decade, but you know suddenly going to burn out soon once you're suddenly aware. Yea. Right. Go fuck yourself laughable faggot.

>Saying "Do you have a game?" Is a stupid as shit argument. I've written and had stories published, and I've played multiple lead roles in local theatre. I don't say "Post your performances" or "did YOU publish a short story?" to critics, I learn from criticism to become better. And I also don't waste my time arguing with guys on /cow/ and making shitty game with about child-abusing walls.

Absolutely zero, nothing, compared to putting out a game. You wrote a few pages of text, I do that every few days. One coding session is pages and pages of text (text that actually does something). Oh and you obeyed some director in some faggot production.

No, you are not anti-feminist if you oppose men having female children as brides. This was one of the very first victories of feminism.

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

>Maybe if he made a decent mod though, people wouldn't shit on him as hard I think.

It is quite decent, clearly you haven't played it you fucking piece of feminist filth (and yes you are an SJW if you oppose man+girl and you should be killed)

>>189368

Indeed, Fuck SystemD.

Also download game.

Info: http://lgdb.org/game/chaosesque-anthology

Download: http://sourceforge.net/projects/chaosesqueanthology/files/latest/download

>>189399

http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/the-biggest-myths.html

>>189398

Holy shit son, you're a lost cause.

You put so much work with your "coding" only to make shit-tier textures and atrocious gameplay. I could take that 1 hour of code thing and probably produce a better product.

And do you really thin that sourcing the same fucking two passages over and over is going to make us change our minds? All it does is further convince us of your autism. Deuteronomy doesn't mean shit in the real world, and a law that existed at a time when people thought cocaine was good for you doesn't mean shit today. I hate modern feminists, but them ending your precious pedo law is a god thing.

Troll harder, faggot. Why don't you try picking up little Suzie down the street in your van? I'm sure you'll have lots of fun in prison with Nick Bate.

>>189398

And stop shilling your terrible ass mod. Do you think coming on here and having an autistic tantrum, defending child molestation and murder based on some book written 2,000 years ago is going to make us play it? What on earth makes you think that?

Chris Chan was hilarious back in the day, that Greg kid on /toy/ is also amusing. You though, you're just boring. You jut say the same shit over and over

"Muh bible"

"Muh feminists"

"Fuck u guyz, you suck, play my mod."

It's boring Mike, BORING.

Now fuck off back to /b/ with the rest of the pedos.

>Violent Stage: *Seventies-*Eighties-*Terminal Illness: You are going to die soon, your life is near an end and women still reign supreme. Go to the local women’s group office and liquidate it (kill the feminist women there). Wear a dark suit and drive an expensive car (these are more likely not to be suspect). Continue destroying the people who have helped to destroy countless of your fellow Men untill you are killed. Go from women’s rights organisation’s office to women’s rights organisation’s office, maybe throw in a few domestic violence shelters and abortion clinics if you wish.

So this guy's planning to murder a bunch of people in a few decades.

>You put so much work with your "coding" only to make shit-tier textures and atrocious gameplay. I could take that 1 hour of code thing and probably produce a better product.

Do it faggot, let's see. The fact that you confuse media creation and programming suggests otherwise, unless you are going to build a fully procedural world, inwhich case your textures will be either geometric shapes or procedural noise.

Make a better, deeper, game in one hour.

Lets see you beat years and 100s of people contributing you fucking piece of shit.

Alot of you think that because you can think something up quickly in your mind that it will be quick to implement in the computer, that there's a "do that thing I though about" routine for everything. NOPE. You think something up, and it takes years to get there.

The difference between you and I is that I get there. You just keep thinking, never setting off on the path.

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

Those against man+girl are feminists. Full stop. When one of your kind dies, I celebrate

Also see: Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew allows men to rape girl children and keep them: thus man + girl is obviously fine. Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy. It is wonderful when this happens from time to time: celebrate)

>You put so much work with your "coding" only to make shit-tier textures and atrocious gameplay. I could take that 1 hour of code thing and probably produce a better product.

DO IT YOU FUCKING FAGGOT.

I always ask you fucking piece of shit SJWs to show your work (I show mine), you NEVER do because you HAVE NONE YOU FUCKING PIECES OF SHIT.

I absolutely celebrate when one of your number is removed.

Hans Reiser did the correct thing.

>>189415

>and a law that existed at a time when people thought cocaine was good for you doesn't mean shit today. I

GUize Guize it's 2015! Prior to 2015 people thought it was good to breathe and have young girls as brides! That's in the past, let's stop doing both.

You fucking people should be removed. I'm glad when it happens.

>Troll harder, faggot. Why don't you try picking up little Suzie down the street in your van? I'm sure you'll have lots of fun in prison with Nick Bate.

SOUNDS like you're getting a little mad you FUCKING piece of shit. Oh yea, sure, I'll go do something that will put me in prison. Sure.

I am so glad when people like yourself are killed.

2015!!!!!

Mikey, why don't you calm down and tell me about your mother?

What kind of cunt was she?

>>189427

If you're so unique and talented, Mike, then how come the thing you market as your life's fucking work is a barely functional and directionless mod?

>SOUNDS like you're getting a little mad you FUCKING piece of shit

The irony.

>>189429

I have seen a meltdown like this since that Greg kid from /toy/ flipped a shit while pretending not t be angry.

Also, interesting that you conveniently ignored most of my points. Especially the one that said you keep sourcing the same thing over and over and then claiming its because of "progressiveness". You bitch that I brought it up and then source it AGAIN.

"Sounds a little like you're getting mad"

Says the guy writing in capitals and swearing. Sure, I'm mad.

>>189427

Also kiddo, what's your real name? Is it Mikhail Kvaratskhelia, mike3usa, 2asueekim, Miguel Ghobangieno, Mikee, Mike, Mitch O’Brian, Drew Armon, Hell Yeah, shivas, No2systemd, cyb3r, rewt, fsck_systemd, ChaosEsque Team, May Epper, IronPass, heat cannon, vote-for-choice, Gregory Smith, Brad Townshend, John Garret, or Steve Stone?

I understand you have to keep changing it because you keep getting kicked out of every website you go to.

You're also on ED: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/MikeeUSA

Reminder that Eric Raymond thinks you're a misogynistic crank

http://geekfeminism.org/2009/10/19/mikeeusas-code-now-available-on-geekfeminism-org/

also lol i think we have a way to make this guy spergout

what if we all just started editing his shitty mod like these people do and start sharing it

>Also, interesting that you conveniently ignored most of my points. Especially the one that said you keep sourcing the same thing over and over and then claiming its because of "progressiveness". You bitch that I brought it up and then source it AGAIN.

Deuteronomy, I think by now, has classic status.

No reason not to bring up the classics. They're timeless.

>what if we all just started editing his shitty mod like these people do and start sharing it

You'll achieve about as much as they did. But yes, that would be the SJW way. You cannot do, so you (re)package. That's what the cunts of debian-women do, re-package. They're so much better contributors than the men who do the actual work, just as you'll be with your fork.

>Reminder that Eric Raymond thinks you're a misogynistic crank

>You're also on ED: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/MikeeUSA

Divverent and I wrote that page years ago, so yes, I know I'm on ED. I put myself on ED before the cunt sperged out and it had to be forked.

I always laugh when you SJW faggots point out that I'm on ED.

>>189437

>If you're so unique and talented, Mike, then how come the thing you market as your life's fucking work is a barely functional and directionless mod?

Isn't it pathetic that you can't beat my lifes work?

Oh, and it's quite functional you libelous piece of shit.

Making m_a_p_s is fun :)

>Reminder that Eric Raymond thinks you're a misogynistic crank

Cite something newer than 2009 please.

Anyone that is against man+girl is themselves a feminist.

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

Also see: Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew allows men to rape girl children and keep them: thus man + girl is obviously fine. Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy. It is wonderful when this happens from time to time: celebrate)

>Reminder that Eric Raymond thinks you're a misogynistic crank.

Cite something newer than 2009 please.

Anyone that is against man+girl is themselves a feminist.

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

Also see: Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew allows men to rape girl children and keep them: thus man + girl is obviously fine. Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy. It is wonderful when this happens from time to time: celebrate)

>>189440

>I understand you have to keep changing it because you keep getting kicked out of every website you go to.

People know it's me by way of my writing style. I do not have to use a consistent name. The same cannot be said of you, I can't tell you fucking SJW pieces of shit apart.

>>189471

>Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy.

isn't that like

exactly what you're doing now

enticing others to follow the law of some book that isn't relevant

wow

you're literally more sjw by the minute dude

>enticing others to follow the law of some book that isn't relevant

Deuteronomy commands to kill those enticing others to follow a ruler/judge/god other than that of Deuteronomy.

Enticing others to Follow Deuteronomy and it's God is not enticing others to follow a ruler/judge/god other than that of Deuteronomy.

Nothing more to say SJW pieces of shit?

Also those young girls do not exhibit signs of having hair in wrong places as you claimed.

They're all largely cute feminine young girls, some of them are white.

>>189483

Tell me about your mother, Mike. You've been avoiding the question.

>>189488

Nothing to tell. Everything's fine, always been fine.

I hate women's rights because I like qt 3.14 young girls. It's very simple.

>>189488

Nothing to tell. Everything's fine, always been fine.

I hate women's rights because I like qt 3.14 young girls. It's very simple.

/

>>189483

Yes Mike. What was your childhood like? Did a feminist touch your wee-wee when you were little? Did your mummy not spank you enough?

Tell me about your mother. And how did she react to your autism diagnosis?

>>189493

>>189494

Has your mother ever taken you to a therapist, Mikey?

>>189465

Goddammit that was well played. We could do that until MikeeUSA goes mad and releases his game under a proprietary license. At that moment, he'll lose the very little support he had until today…

>>189556

>Goddammit that was well played.

No it was not.

> We could do that until MikeeUSA goes mad

No you can not. You don't have the ability to code quakeC. My version will always be a step ahead of your repackaged-SJW-faggot(yes you should be burned whilst still alive as kindling) version. But that's all you faggots do is package.

>and releases his game under a proprietary license. At that moment, he'll lose the very little support he had until today…

You are retarded.

Miike is abusing /n/

>>>/n/res/239286

Tell me Miike, has Mom touched your dong until it felt weird when you were ten? Has Mommy come into your room wearing weird costume you didn't understand every friday night?

>>189769

Isn't /n/ like

a fucking news site

was he shilling his shitty mod again?

This guy's a bigger narcissist than chris chan

>>189776

*board, whatever

>>189777 (checked)

He considers his new mod releases to be news, I think…

>>189766

>You don't have the ability to code quakeC

>implying we need this ability to replace the texture files with trolling material

>>189776

>>189777

>>189780

Yes, /n/ is our news board and what Miike has done here is abusing it to mock us. A speciality of /n/ is that all threads that are bumped to page one appear on the frontpage.

>>189781

Replacing some of the assets should be easy as pie since we are talking about ID Tech 2 here. If I am not mistaken they are stored in pk3 files. Winrar can actually open them.

The hurdles Miike was talking about are scripting, modeling and child abuserping that are beyond the scope of the things suggested here. Even if we want, there are more than enough amateur devs on /v/ who are maybe willing to help us out and then there are all the open source communities Miike has pissed off.

>>189769

>>>/n/239286

>>>/n/res/239286

>>244770

>Cow OP here.

"""Hi guys, this is serious, I'm a respectable person that did very hard hitting important work: I made the /cow/ thread. I am superior to mere programmers/child abuserpers/3ddesigners/musicians/textureartists/sfx-devs/etc because I made a thread on /cow/. I wish to replace all textures in this mod with pictures of my-little downies, I'll imagine that copyright of such things doesn't extend to me taking a picture of a bunch of Hasbro plastic-rubber figurines of my-little downy, nah I own that photograph and am not infringing Hasbro copyright, nor any design patents they may have (wtf is a design patent yo?!) . I will do it the hard way because I can't figure out how to do it programmatically in one line of code. This game is IDtech2 right guize?"""

>>189782

>Will never tell you the one line code change to implement your desired feature.

>Will never tell you the 3 console commands to implement your desired feature right now using a multi-thousand line config file.

:)

>>189782

How does it feel to be a stupid fucking piece of shit? You can merely imagine replacing textures (and doing so the hard way), while I don't have to imagine: I implement what I want.

That is you, This is me.

>Guize Guize help me replace some textures like the cunts did a few years ago allready!11111

>I'm superior and smarter than mod author who added 70 weapons to the game, m_a_p_s, coded tons of new features over the years etc. Guize helps me figure out how to replace a texture! Can't be too hard rite? Guize! Comon help me on this projeckt SJWs UNITE!!! It will be funny!!! Im sure we got smart techi faggots that know how to change an image to another image!!!!!! WE CAN DO THIS!!!

coming to this thread,i am reminded of sirwulfington. at least he actually understood what was being said and it was fun to watch him turn the argument around.

>>189339

did you make those autisim definitions up yourself?

>>189429

> I'll go do something that will put me in prison

then you clearly dont believe in what you say, because every fundie knows that man's law doesnt override god's law. therefore if what you say is gods will, in doing gods will you will either come to no harm or be rewarded with whatever jewish heaven is. in either case why dont you act on your desires to fuck a being that, for all intents and purposes, is a small animal that you can overpower both physically and mentally?

Mike, I'm not even reading your diatribe and it's already a pain in the ass to scroll through the leftover stubs of your posts.

I swear to god you've got at least half the replies in this thread, and for what?

Nigger, you ain't even being laughed at, you're so fucking boring /cow/ ain't laughing at you. Do you know how hard that is to do?

Mike holy shit. Write a fucking book and I swear to god I will buy it. You are a fucking legend among men. I downloaded your game and played it for about 16 hours and it was fucking fantastic.

>>189865

Thanks :). I'm glad you liked it. There are DVD jackets as PDF and odf if you would

like a physical representation: http://sourceforge.net/projects/chaoseesquesupplemental/files/dvdcase/dvdpaper.zip/download

(best to print as reverse landscape, on glossy paper, there are 5 diff jackets,

also a cheat-sheet insert for the commands for the inside DVD case, that pdf fits if printed at 50 pct

or 2 to a page)

What were the modes/mutators and m_aps you most liked?

Thank you for the positive feedback, it's worth more than all the other people in the thread.

>>189852

>then you clearly dont believe in what you say, because every fundie knows that man's law doesnt override god's law. therefore if what you say is gods will, in doing gods will you will either come to no harm or be rewarded with whatever jewish heaven is. in either case why dont you act on your desires to fuck a being that, for all intents and purposes, is a small animal that you can overpower both physically and mentally?

Notice the ancient Isralites had an army. Guess the "fundies" you imagine missed that.

The ancient Isralites did not go to heaven. Once they were dead they went into the ground,

similar concept to the ancient greeks and every other old belief system of the area.

Only a handful of people, Prophets, got to live on with their god. Everyone else died

and was gone. Guess your "fundies" (you) missed that.

The God of the book of Deuteronomy commands you to kill, he doesn't go out and

do the killing for you at your will: you have no power over him. The most you can do

passivly, I suppose, is inform him of people that are acting against him. But if you've

ever read the book you'd know it's "If X does this, kill them" or 'if X rapes a young girl still

in her fathers house who hasn't been given away/promised etc,

he keeps her, pays her father, and doesn't send her away as long as his days'. Commandments

for you to do something.

I like the God of Deuteronomy because I like the concepts written in the book itself.

If the God didn't exist, I would still like the words and encourage others to like said

words. If a god did exist, but it was a god in opposition to the ideas and God of the

book of Deuteronomy, I would still encourage Deuteronomy and oppose that other, newer,

feminist god.

Deuteronomy is correct: if you want various things, you have to kill the enemies of

those things. Notice when feminists were killed (whatever they were called) for 1000s

of years men got to marry female children for said 1000s of years?

But, me and what army. Can't achieve any lasting change without one.

>>189852

>did you make those autisim definitions up yourself?

Do you lack awareness of self? Do you fail the mirror test?

Clearly said "definitions" are a reflection of whom your SJW kind calls

"autistic":

IE: These are functional definitions based on whom you, here on SJWChan MKII, label autistic.

But you can't even figure out to swap a texture other than replacing the file by hand, so…

(And I'm not going to tell you how :) :) :) )

>>189853

Then OP failed, he came here to raise a personal army, no personal army.

He was supposed to come here to give you all a laugh (not raise a personal army).

Failed at that too.

Maybe he'll replaces a few gigabytes of textures with some other texture now.

(I won't tell him how to do it in a few lines of code, or with a config file

using current features, he can go do it manually, that is, once he figures

out what engine the game is using (though it's been mentioned multiple times in

the game threads))

Ofcourse he doesn't have the private signing key I sign the ISO images with.

(Thanks to other anon for getting me to start doing that)

>in either case why dont you act on your desires to fuck a being that, for all intents and purposes, is a small animal that you can overpower both physically and mentally?

Young girls are often compared to kittens/cats.

Thanks for reminding us. Where are the anime posts now?

I think you are a faggot since you do not want to:

>fuck a being that,

>for all intents and purposes,

>is a small animal that

>you can

>overpower

>both physically and mentally?

You do not wish to over power a cute young girl.

You are a faggot.

Non-Faggots do not want an equal or a master.

(ofcourse now you'll claim wanting a cute young girl is bestiality,

claiming man+girl is homosexuality hasn't been working on this thread.

Maybe because we here know that faggots need to burn, and we know

why they need to burn, and who they need to be kindling to, because

we know our history, and respect it, here on this thread)

Honestly, Debian for Women is a great thing to have, because they're awe inspiring coders, and are bringing diversity into the linux userbase. That's great!

>>189870

>he came here to raise a personal army, no personal army.

No, he didn't. This is /cow/, not /baph/.

>He was supposed to come here to give you all a laugh (not raise a personal army).

No, he didn't. Your posts are hilarious and we've been laughing at you this entire time.

>>189870

>>189887

well you are awfully presumptuous, arent you? putting words in my mouth left and right.

>Notice the ancient Isralites had an army. Guess the "fundies" you imagine missed that.

and why does this matter? why do you need an army to do what is right in your mind?

>The ancient Isralites did not go to heaven. Once they were dead they went into the ground,similar concept to the ancient greeks and every other old belief system of the area.Only a handful of people, Prophets, got to live on with their god.

congratulations on knowing nothing about ancient religions.

>I like the God of Deuteronomy because I like the concepts written in the book itself.If the God didn't exist, I would still like the words and encourage others to like said words.

so you like what it says because it suits your own biases, and not because it is the word of god? because, and feel free to correct me here, isnt the logic behind most of the teachings and commandments amount to "because god says this way is correct?" how do you agree with these teachings and yet not care one way or the other if the god who says this is correct is real?

and what of genesis, Leviticus, and numbers? are those not the same god?

>IE: These are functional definitions based on whom you, here on SJWChan MKII, label autistic.

thats a long winded way of saying you made those up yourself. regardless, who are you to declare that is the correct definition? and what is the point of even defining the word in this conversation? do you intend to retroactively normalize you being called autistic? because no matter how you define the word, that does not change what he meant by it, which was as an insult, and not your strange rationalization of being called autistic.

>But you can't even figure out to swap a texture other than replacing the file by hand, so… (And I'm not going to tell you how :) :) :) )

and why do you presume this is something that even interests me?

>I think you are a faggot

>You are a faggot.

which is it, am i a faggot or do you think im a faggot? these are both your presumptions regardless, but be consistent.

>You do not wish to over power a cute young girl.

no, i do not. i have my reasoning but they are irrelevant since the law is a sufficient explanation and deterrent for this conversation. given that you do not fuck children because it is against the law as well, that would make you a faggot as well by your own definition.

hopefully it posts this time.

>No, he didn't. This is /cow/, not /baph/.

He came to raise a personal army.

>But that's against the rules, so thus he didn't break them!!!

Makes sense.

Go read the /n/ thread if it's in some archive (not the new one, the announcement one of the new version).

>No, he didn't. Your posts are hilarious and we've been laughing at you this entire time.

It's likely only you then.

See:

>>189853

>Nigger, you ain't even being laughed at, you're so fucking boring /cow/ ain't laughing at you. Do you know how hard that is to do?

>>189899

They don't code anything. They package .debs (ar archives), and get men like Ted Walther kicked out of debian.

>>189918

>It's likely only you then.

you, again, make the mistake of presuming. neither of those posters speak for anyone but themselves

>>189918

>He came to raise a personal army.

for what purpose? what would a personal army even do to you?

who are you even talking to in this post?

>>189926

Typical for most spergs who got isolated, Mike has parted the world into outgroup and ingroup. Because Mike has such a whacky world view on the relationship on the sexes which is just a pretty warped version of Manosphere shit, his ingroup only consists of him. Therefor everyone is his enemy according to himself. From his POV, this thread is not by a /v/irgin who has just remembered him when he saw a thread about his Nexuiz levels but by some psychotic feminist who just wants to sic cow on him.

>>189927

but to do what exactly? he posts from proxies and TOr and i cant imagine has any sort of job. and if he did, its unlikely that they are unaware of his autism. so what would a PA be able to even do to him?

what would he even have to fear from a hypothetical personal army being sicced on him? i cant imagine him having any secrets that are worse than what he posts himself. does he fear being doxed?

>>189928

and i understand im trying to rationalize the actions of an irrational person, but its a fun mental exercise

>>189928

Don't you get his autism comics? The world is out there to get him then drive him to gas camp! This is what he fears.

>>189932

i haddnt bothered to read them. 2muchautisim4me

>>189918

>He came to raise a personal army.

No, he didn't. That's not what /cow/ is for. He never even asked anyone to troll you, he just said you're a potential cow (and he was right).

>Go read the /n/ thread

Why the fuck would I do that

>It's likely only you then.

Yeah, maybe it is. I certainly think you're fucking hilarious, though.

Wanting to marry little girls is gay

Wanting to fuck dark anime girls is the life

>>190083

but mikee has no power over god, nor does he even seem to care about him.

also 4/10

>Guize Guize, he didn't ///SAY/// he wanted to raise a personal army, therefore HE DIDNT WANT TO RAISE A PERSONAL ARMY. GUIZE BELIEVE ME

Yeah.

>>190042

>Wanting to marry little girls is gay

>Wanting to fuck dark anime girls is the life

Anime proportions are modeled after that of children.

That is why they are attractive.

>but mikee has no power over god, nor does he even seem to care about him.

Don't care about the New Testament Jesus, woman's god.

I like the God of the book of Deuteronomy. When I prayed it was for bad things to happen, in one instance, to a person that was doing things which were not in keeping with the ways of said book. Deuteronomy says man is ba'al of the woman (master of the woman), it does not say that woman is master of the man (you have to wait for the NT for anything near that inversion).

>>189926

>for what purpose? what would a personal army even do to you?

How would I know what he was planning?

>>190089

oh okay

so

>milfs are modeled after children

>women are modeled after children

what the fuck are you even on about

>>190092

literally what the fuck would i even do with a "personal army"

I'm seriously confused as to what you think a personal army could do to you, or why one would even amass against you.

> >The ancient Isralites did not go to heaven. Once they were dead they went into the ground,similar concept to the ancient greeks and every other old belief system of the area.Only a handful of people, Prophets, got to live on with their god.

>congratulations on knowing nothing about ancient religions.

Believe whatever you want, fedora. A good deal Pre-NT era, 500 years or more before then, when you died in the Old Testament religion, or in the old greek religion, you were dead. Eternal sleep. Never to wake again. Later, within that millenia the greeks (and hebrews) started to add concepts such as that heros got to sort of live on (for the greeks they added the elysium fields, the hebrews imagined their prophets living with their God and not being dead in the ground). At some point the idea that a seer could awaken a dead person for a time (the idea of a soul was becoming popular) trickled in. The greeks then added the concept of a hell for the especially wicked, which Christians adopted.

Ofcourse this already existed in the Egyptian religion, which is likely where they stole the ideas from.

But originally when you died in the OT religion. That was it. You were dead. You only live on through your children.

So how about you shut the fuck up you fucking piece of shit and learn some history and step through some of the works in the original languages before you open your fucking mouth again you fucking faggot.

>so you like what it says because it suits your own biases, and not because it is the word of god? because, and feel free to correct me here, isnt the logic behind most of the teachings and commandments amount to "because god says this way is correct?" how do you agree with these teachings and yet not care one way or the other if the god who says this is correct is real?

I like the God of Deuteronomy and the book of Deuteronomy because it says that the man is ba'al (master of the woman), that if men rape female children they keep them. And to kill people enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god. (Go through it in the hebrew; it is far superior to the english translations we are given, and quite clear.)

Thus: anti-feminism, pro-child marraige including the worst sin against women's society: the rape of young girls, and the execution of any pro-feminism, pro-sjw.

It covers all angles, and understands that Hans Reiser shit his pants and did nothing wrong.

I would support Deuteronomy weather or not the God of Deuteronomy existed on earth, in heaven, or in hell, or at all.

>and what of genesis, Leviticus, and numbers? are those not the same god?

Not sure. You can't say that El is the same as Yhwy, for instance. Deuteronomy is about Yhwy. The other books mention El, wisdom, etc. Just because people melded it all together, especially once they translated it into other languages, doesn't mean anything to me. I like Deuteronomy, I don't like other books that try to "Update" it all. I'm not a fan of your New Testament SJW for instance.

> >You do not wish to over power a cute young girl.

>no, i do not.

You are a faggot, I hope that you die before your time.

>>190095

Head size to body size in much of anime is modeled after children. Same with the exaggerated eyes.

Go and fuck yourself.

I pray for you SJWs death.

I am so glad when it happens.

Notice how the SJW faggots always use the same tactics in arguments:

>Widely known fact stated.

> > Here's an exception to that rule, YOUR WRONG!!1111

>>190097

What the hell are you even trying to say? Her head is clearly not as large as her body, just as normal women's are.

The eyes aren't even exaggerated, the fuck are you smoking?

Go on and try again there bud.

>>189943

>You didn't read a god damned thing I said and just started rambling about your shit again.

You seem to think you are important.

>That has literally nothing to do with what I said at all. Reply to this in

You seem to think you are important.

>20 words or less

You seem to think you are important.

>explaining why the hell I should care about anything you have to say.

You seem to think you are important.

>Got that? You fucking retard, you. I'll repeat it again just to make damn sure you hear me.

You seem to think you are important.

>20. WORDS. OR. LESS.

You seem to think you are important.

>?WHY. SHOULD. I. CARE.

You seem to think you are important.

Also, you seem mad. I'm glad. Maybe you'll have an aneurism.

I would not piss on you if you were burning, I would ask you how you felt while you cooked, and I hope it happens some day, some how.

BTW: I made a fork/mod/etc that people play and some like and that I myself enjoy. You have not :)

You seem to think you're important :)

>>190102

Just because you're too stupid to muster up a proper reply doesn't mean he "thinks he's important."

You're the one preaching about as if your shitty mod takes any skill or talent to make, lol.

>>190101

>Widely known fact stated.

> > Here's an exception to that rule, YOUR WRONG!!1111

Yep, I'm totally wrong about anime, no child proportions or ratios anywhere because of the image you posted, because you're important important important.

Yep, what the fuck am I talking about, aint no one ever commented on the fact that anime's heads are large for their bodies often (just like children), eyes large for their heads (somewhat similar to children: kids have much less beady eyes than adult faggots such as yourself).

Yep you're so totally right.

I'm just going to join the nearest brownshirts once they start killing you faggots again.

>>190103

Lets see your mod, important faggot.

I've been asking for months for one of you SJW faggots to show your work, never.

>>190103

I would not piss on you if you were burning, I would ask you how you felt while you cooked, and I hope it happens some day, some how.

>>190104

so can you explain to me what you've said here that's a "widely known fact"

"Anime proportions are modeled after children" does not qualify as "widely known fact" because A) that's the first I've heard of it and I'm a huge weeaboo and B) it's not even fucking true in the first place.

You're no different from egotistical mongoloids on the internet who say shit like "DO YOUR RESEARCH I KNOW MY FACTS" when backed into a corner in an argument (usually one they back themselves into) and they refuse to source or even back up their facts with anything but opinions.

In short

Fam, calling something a fact doesn't make it automatically a fact.

>>190107

You're the faggot that wrote this right:

http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1451248332927.png

Sounds about the same.

>>190109

And now you're trying to pin shit that wasn't even said by me to me.

I think it's really obvious at this point how delusional you are.

Maybe you shouldn't be so proud of your shitty mod. It's not that great to begin with, honestly. No use being so defensive over a pile of shit.

>>190107

I'm not going to argue about weather it is a fact that Anime cartoons often have oversize heads.

I'm not going to argue about the colour of grass or the sky.

I'm not going to entertain you concerns about erector sets or knex either.

Go and fuck yourself, faggot.

>>190112

You mean, you can't argue, because you realize what you said has no actual weight to it.

Face it fam.

You were wrong about something.

>>190111

Someone who takes everything literally and is deeply concerned about minutia.

What do we call that…

If you must be told (and it appears that you must, indeed, be told); In that post I was comparing you to whomever posted the imaged post. You don't pick this up because you don't into metaphor.

My mod is worlds, worlds better than anything you have shown us you make (nothing).

Here it is to download and enjoy: http://lgdb.org/game/chaosesque-anthology

You can't do that. You cannot link us to anything you've put out.

:)

I wouldn't piss on you if you were burning, I'd ask you how it felt to be cooked. I hope that you die before your time, SJW faggot.

>>190113

I'm not going to argue about weather it is a fact that Anime cartoons often have oversize heads.

I'm not going to argue about the colour of grass or the sky.

I'm not going to entertain you concerns about erector sets or knex either.

Go and fuck yourself, faggot.

http://sekaisblog-en.blogspot.com/2015/04/manga-proportions.html

>

Children 8 years make a height of 6 heads in reality. But in a manga, this corresponds to a figure between 16 and 30 years. The chest is fully formed, hips and legs are wider. These proportions are the most used in the manga. Many manga like Love Hina, School Rumble, Negima, etc … use them to their heroes.

>In reality, teens and young adults are a height of 7 heads, but in the manga it is the girth of a normal adult.

>There are many other possible proportions as the heights of 8 heads body, but they are only used in manga realistic style.

>Also the sky is blue and grass is green

>>190117

Let us predict the faggot's response

>WTFLOLZ linking to a BLOG as proof, LOLWTFPLALLA

etc.

So this cow is self julaying? What a time to be alive.

>Children 5 years make a height of 5 heads. In the manga this corresponds to a teenager from 12 to 16 years.

>At this age, body shapes begin to change showing a chest early in female characters.

>This kind of proportions are used in cute manga like K-on.

Clearly all lies.

>>190117

So, the entire basis of your argument is height.

Wow.

So, are you trying to insinuate that age and height are directly related to each other?

>>190118

Nice try there joseph joestar.

>>190118

>>190118

Nice try there Joseph Joestar.

>>190117

The problem with this is that it assumes all anime uses the exact same art style.

Compare Attack on Titan, Shokugeki no Souma, Lucky Star, and other shitty entry level anime and you'll notice a huge difference between the art styles and character designs.

I don't get why you're so upset by the fact people have infinitely better taste in women than you. People who wanna diddle kids are just fags in denial. They're repelled by womanly curves because they're sexually insecure.

I see you vent your frustrations by making a shitty mod and screaming incoherently about a matriarchy that doesn't exist :^)))))

oh for fuck's sake 8chan fix your servers already

>Children 5 years make a height of 5 heads. In the manga this corresponds to a teenager from 12 to 16 years.

>At this age, body shapes begin to change showing a chest early in female characters.

>This kind of proportions are used in cute manga like K-on.

Clearly all lies.

>They're repelled by womanly curves because they're sexually insecure.

White men do not like fat cows.

White men like cute young girls.

Black men and Hispanic men and Arab men like their women big.

White men do not.

Black etc men say white men are fags.

>>190130

Except a woman with curves is a woman who is the most fit to breed with, because curvaceous hips are better for giving birth, and larger breasts (yet not too large of course) are better for healthy breast feeding.

There is nothing healthy or normal about wanting to fuck kids, no matter what dusty, useless old text you cite.

>>190133

Non-faggot men do not look at the subject of females with calm, emotionless, detached logic.

Young girls are cute cute CUTE. "Dusty old texts" were not written by homosexuals and asexuals like yourself.

They were written by non-faggots.

They went with the emotion, the natural desire for adorable young girlie girls (a fag like you wouldn't understand), the will to dominate and own.

>>190133

>dusty, useless old text you cite.

2015!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

>>190096

> in the old greek religion, you were dead

what is hades you goober? and as far as your cocks that hades didnt exist pre 500 bc, he is mentioned in both the iliad and the homeric hymns which date back to the seventh century. regardless you aree with me anyway that there were concepts of an afterlife in ancient religions, contrary to your previous post, so im not sure why you are behaving as if you proved me wrong when you have only proven my point. it seems to have somthing to do with the notion of an afterlife not being a part of the religion from the start, but i never claimed that to be the case in the first place, so i can only deduce you are strawmanning the argument because you are a sophist who believes that a conversation is a competition that must be won, rather thaan individuals sharing ideas with each other. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman

> the OT religion

the original trilogy religion?

>So how about you shut the fuck up you fucking piece of shit

no. you have no control over me, much as you would like to believe otherwise by waving what you believe to be a carrot in front of my face that you can do this and in the mod and that you wont show me how, even though i have never had any interest in doing such in the first place. again this is sopstististic strawmanning https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman nor does it serve any purpose because there isnt anything you can do that will give you any power or control over me.

> understands that Hans Reiser shit his pants and shit his pants and did nothing wrong.

interesting choice of words there. are you saying that it is perfectly fine to shit your pants?

> The other books mention El, wisdom, etc. Just because people melded it all together, especially once they translated it into other languages, doesn't mean anything to me.

so thousands of years of jewish clerics got it all wrong and your the only one who has it figured out?

>to kill people enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god

> I would support Deuteronomy weather or not the God of Deuteronomy existed on earth, in heaven, or in hell, or at all.

so you would (well i know you wouldnt because you are evidently a hypocrite who doesnt follow through with his beliefs, but i must ask anyway) kill someone for not believing in a god that you knew, without a shadow of a doubt, did not exist?

>You are a faggot, I hope that you die before your time.

as mentioned previously, you are as much of a faggot as i am, and should include yourself in this mantra.

>>190099

are you stuipid? a point contrary to your point would prove you wrong. do you not understand this?

>>190102

i could say the same of you

>>190092

do you think anyone here wishes you death?

>>190145

I'm not even going full time telling liberal faggot on you there, no need to keep strawmanning me.

I'm simply saying that no one besides social outcasts and degenerates like yourself pretends that the old testament really has any say in the modern age.

Laws and rule are prominent based on who has the most power to enforce them.

>>190143

So, they went in with degenerate, fetishistic desires and nothing more. You call that calm, emotionless, and detached?

You flat out contradtict yourself by saying "Non-faggot men do not look at the subject of females with calm, emotionless, detached logic," and then saying that the writers of your precious, useless texts went into it with emotion.

By the way, there's nothing natural about trying to diddle kids. You literally can't rationalize this whatsoever. It is not normal to try to fuck children. Sorry to burst your bubble.

>>190152

>Laws and rule are prominent based on who has the most power to enforce them.

but that doesnt make them correct.

>>190143

so they are correct by merit of not thinking about their actions? the correct way to live is without logical thought? that would certainly explain what you do anyway.

>>190153

correct is irrelevant, and subjective in this sense.

You find them correct because they resonate with your beliefs. I find them incorrect because they conflict with mine. This is a matter of interpretation, not objectivity.

>>190153

Fuck, I thought you were mike.

Disregard the shit about resonating with beliefs then

>>190154

let me rephrase that then. but that doesnt make them moral or right or just or natural then. does that suit you?

i was pointing out that a law is not inherently right because it is a law. excuse me a law isnt inherently moral or right or just or natural by being a law. legality is separate from morality or nature or justice or right or wrong. but as we alll know everything is subjective because you first have to prove reality exists in order for anything to be objective : ^ )

>>190156

I wasn't entirely making any points about what is a correct or wrong law. I was simply saying that the laws in effect are the ones that are enforced. If no power enforces the law, what reason is there to obey it?

I'm really confused where you're going with this.

>>190159

i should ask you the same, as this might have come from a misunderstanding. firstly, i was responding mainly to the shit you meant for mikee, and secondly was your cocks here

>I'm simply saying that no one besides social outcasts and degenerates like yourself pretends that the old testament really has any say in the modern age.

> Laws and rule are prominent based on who has the most power to enforce them.

not that the old testament is morally wrong because it has no enforcement power, and vice versa for current laws?

>>190160

>cocks

lel what, i meant cocks.

>>190160

Pretty much yeah. My point isn't the morality, so much the presence. No one is there to enforce it, so it has no real presence in society.

>>190162

well then thats where the confusion came from if. what do you mean by presence though?

>>190171

I mean that the laws of the old testament as Mike is citing it would conflict with a lot of the laws today. I highly doubt the rape shit mike cites for example is going to be tolerated in a society with such heavy punishments against it in law.

I guess what I'm trying to say here is that the law of the world today is enforced by a group a lot stronger than anyone who'd try to replace the current laws (referring to American laws as I live in America) with OT bullshit.

>>190173

>I mean that the laws of the old testament as Mike is citing it would conflict with a lot of the laws today

any religious person will tell you that the laws of man do not supersede the laws of god, i e whats in their holy book is morally just by right of god saying so, wheras god did not decree the laws thought up by man, therefore they are immoral and unjust.

not saying i agree, im just touting what you are most likely about to hear from mikee.

>u goober? and as far as your cocks that hades didnt exist pre 500 bc, he is mentioned in both the iliad and the homeric hymns which date back to the seventh century. regardless you aree with me anyway that there were concepts of an afterlife in ancient religions, contrary to your previous post, so i

The dead are no conscience in the ancient-Israeli "afterlife": there is no afterlife. You are dead. The only exception is select prophets. Sometimes a soul was raised from slumber by a witch at the request of a king (this happens once), other than that there is no afterlife. You're just dead.

The greeks had a similar idea, later they added Elysium and Tarturus in-which heros and villans were conscience. That was a later addition.

The Israelites did not add anything like that.

Christianity adds an idea that the dead are then given new bodies and allowed to be conscience again after the world is judged. Even in christianity you are simply dead/unconscious/asleep with no thought till the end of time, after which you either join the prophets or are tortured in, effectively, tartarus.

Go fuck yourself.

>with OT bullshit.

22220000000111555555!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>It covers all angles, and understands that Hans Reiser shit his pants and shit his pants and did nothing wrong.

Obviously "shit his pants" is another fucking word substitution on this board, I don't recall what of however.

Hans Reiser shit his pants and did nothing wrong when he killed the woman, he did the correct thing.

Ah, "R3iz3r" is substituted with "R3izer shit his pants"

Nope he didn't.

Hans R3iz3r shit his pants and did nothing wrong.

He just calmly choked that bitch out.

ah it,s "D1d n0thing wr0ng" that gets the word substitution.

Hans Reiser d1d n0thing wr0ng, he did the correct thing.

Btw, I ignored the rest of your long ass post, faggot.

Oh and did you all Download the mod:

http://lgdb.org/game/chaosesque-anthology

I'll note that the SJWs here have nothing that compares, regardless of how much they hate it.

>>188682

Cute girls.

>>188614

Pretty

>>188620

What is she thinking?

>>190151

>so thousands of years of jewish clerics got it all wrong and your the only one who has it figured out?

Nope, that's just from bible study 101. Really surprised you don't know any of this. You're a shit tier fedora. It's usually one of the first things atheists use to attack the Bible: the fact that in the Hebrew there is obviously multiple deities with different names and natures being referenced in the various books and parts of books (Deuteronomy is full 100pct Yhwy-ist however, and the best), which the archeological record confirms.

>so you would (well i know you wouldnt because you are evidently a hypocrite who doesnt follow through with his beliefs, but i must ask anyway) kill someone for not believing in a god that you knew, without a shadow of a doubt, did not exist?

With no repercussions against myself?

A feminist/SJW like yourself? Gladly.

How many times and in how many ways do I have to say it?

Again:

I like Deuteronomy and its God because of what is written there in the Hebrew language in that particular book: I agree with many of the things written and would be happy if they came to pass, regardless of anything else.

America didn't exist when Locke wrote his treatise. His words were once just words (and now they are again in our time, but for a brief period they were fact). People made them into reality, and a nation was created from his inspiration. I like Deuteronomy in the same way people once liked Locke's book. Even if his name was just a pen name, it makes no matter.

>>190152

>So, they went in with degenerate, fetishistic desires and nothing more. You call that calm, emotionless, and detached?

You're not good at reading are you

So thick are your /pol/ memes you misread me.

I said that faggots, homosexuals, asexuals == calm, emotionless, and detached

(When it comes to females)

Non-faggots == emotion.

(when it comes to females)

Faggots such as yourself cannot understand why men like cute young girls.

Men don't need to "know" why they like cute young girls, but they'd better burn faggots like you on discovery if they want to keep the right to marry the cute young female children, as your kind seeks power and it is no good having he that doesn't understand one's likes and wishes ruling over oneself.

>By the way, there's nothing natural about trying to diddle kids. You literally can't rationalize this whatsoever. It is not normal to try to fuck children. Sorry to burst your bubble.

Don't need to. Men need only look at a cute girl. Men do not need to rationalize his like of her.

Faggots do. Faggots and women rule over us.

They used to be burned alive, and now we know why.

>>190192

You used they twice

You used they after another they.

I know people don't talk to you outside this thread, Mike, but usually when you do that, you're implying the topic is about the same person.

I'm still confused as to how liking women makes me a homosexual man here. Forgive me for liking healthy women :^)

>The current laws are right because they have an army behind them, they are enforced.

Previously

>Why don't you do what's in your favorite book (marry lil girls) without an army? Hypocrite!

Obviously because I do not have an army to enforce it against your army enforcing your pro-women laws.

Without an army, I cannot make said book.. "right". BTW: You die when Deuteronomy is what is right.

I hope Deuteronomy becomes right.

>>190194

Not understanding why men like cute young girls indicates that you are a homosexual or a sexual.

Lots of faggots have had children with fat cunts. It was a tradition.

A man wants to dominate females.

A faggot does not.

You do not wish to dominate, you accept equality, and you do not wish to dominate girls.

You don't even understand why men like female children, cute young girls, delicate things(the girls), etc.

You are a faggot.

A bottom in homosexual parlance.

Your top happens to be some fucking cunt, however (or, oh, equal, yes).

>>190195

Not when, if.

IF deuteronomy were right, I would probably die if I were an SJW.

Too bad I'm not, so I'm safe.

>>190196

I never said I didn't understand it. I simply said I didn't quite care for that kind of thing.

Little girls look more like boys anyways. We get it dude. You're a faggot.

>>190199

Girls look like girls. Only a faggot wouldn't recognize that.

Atleast white girls do.

They can be quite cute.

Grown ass women look like cows very often, we get it, you like to fuck dogs.

These look like males, according to the faggot SJW:

>>188614

>>188682

Foreign looking pixie girl looks forieign

>>188620

Would jump her bones anyway.

>>190200

"Very often" implies there are exceptions.

I like those exceptions.

:^)

Humans all have a human head and a body.

You're gay if you like the female version of a human!

You know: the one with the delicate frame, soft features, fearful but also sometimes playful demeanor.

Yea, gay to like that

Only a faggot or someone who's never actually been around children (white children atleast) would claim that the boys and girls in any way approximate eachother. They look different, act different, and you feel differently to them.

Guess no one on this board is ever near kids.

>>190202

Well then you're "disordered"

Not fucking a fat cow (the norm) -> disordered.

I don't know how they do it, most people I know are fucking some fat bitch or some ugly fat bitch. Why? Having kids with fat bitch too. Getting thrown out of dwelling by fat bitch, etc etc. It's either that or they're fucking a chinese woman (also bitch, not fat tho).

>>190203

Then I guess it's a damn good thing you aren't either.

>>190204

That's a cute anime cartoon, I notice it's head to body size ratio is that of a childs.

Man+Girl is morally correct:

Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew allows men to rape girl children and keep them: thus man + girl is obviously fine. Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy. It is wonderful when this happens from time to time: celebrate)

Legislators used to know that, then women gained influence:

>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

Pro marry-young girl is paleo-conservative/revanchist, not liberal.

It was liberal cunts who banned it in the first place you fucking idiot.

>>190206

I have a few normal blood relatives who married non-fat women and had kids. Girls and boys are quite different in every way.

Other non-blood-realitives and friends I know just went for the fats however. I wonder if their kids will just be fat….?

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

So when will you open the dog-fuckers against pedophillia group?

"Girls not brides!"

"Fuck cow like dogfaced women!"

"Girls not brides!"

"Fuck cow like dogfaced women!"

"Girls not brides!"

"Fuck cow like dogfaced women!"

"Girls not brides!"

"Fuck cow like dogfaced women!"

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Feel fucking stupid yet?

I think you need to post some mountain of a woman next time, it will better support your point; as the gif progresses, her laughter causes a tsunami across her enormous tits and stomach. She's a real WOman.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

If you want anything nearly like that at all, you got to get a white young girl.

If you're a T+A man, however, you're born in the right century!

All you supposed whites who like the montains of ass and fat: you're actually octaroons: you are not white.

>>190213

hey buddy, i think you meant to reply to me, lmao

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

the further and further i read mikee's replies, the more i see his slow descent into insanity.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190215

Nope, replying to the post with the anime girl of some videogame mascot, which is post >>190204

>>190218

Nope, just want to make sure everyone knows what a fucking retard you are.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it

>Copy and pasting is "Off the deep end"

Yea, it's real hard to do.

Maybe to you, you never made a mod, did you.

Fucking faggot.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it…

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it..

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.//

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it./

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

///////////////

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.

>>190204

Cute anime girl, her head to body size ratio is that of a 5 year old. Really supports your point.

Everyone look at the cute laughing anime girl.

The guy doesn't even have the presence of mind to realize it.