/cow/ - Lolcows

Would it be possible to get some pinned threads for the largest pigs? That way the board wouldn't trip over moviebob and cwc threads all the time.

Well the reddit-ness started here January 2015 when Peter Coffin became relevant. Probably should have started moderating back then

i thought you died

>>199468

1's gonna reduce cocks.

2 makes perfect sense.

can't 4 make it harder to laugh at other 8chan boards?

Would 4 include making threads about boards and BOs? I can kind of agree with that because there has always been that problem of cannibalizing ourselves but I wonder if that would extend to other boards unless it's an extreme case like when NoLongerSilenced (or however he put his name) was the owner of /sjw/ and a lot of people legit couldn't tell if he was trolling or serious.

The rest I can agree with, especially the old ass threads being bumped for no reason or than reacting.

>>199576

did you guys ever find out why 8chan got pelted with shitty users?

https://archive.is/n1gAJ

well last year during the purge reddit got destroyed and ripped a new one. Some of these banned subreddits went to stormfront first, stormers got annoyed by them and told them to go to 8chan. Some did go to voat but alot of reddit cancer stayed on /pol/ and /v/.

Insults on 8chan can vary but being called a redditor triggers these people. They dont react well to anime images or shit like "kek."

They overexaggerate and shitpost just like they would back on /v/.

>>199578

mean to quote this guy

>>199571

>>199593

I guess 3rd most popular who cares fuck you Peter

>>199575

4 is meant for people who post le merchant maymay's in the thread when it doesn't even make sense to do it.

>>199576

No. Though if the thread is lame or sounds like a personal army request. It will be deleted/locked/saged bumped.

For anyone who just wants to talk about E-celebs, it's allowed on /tv/. You might want to make that known.

I think a lot of people expect this board to be like ED, a place for general internet drama.

Hey Introman.

Good to see you are still around.

>>199468

I think parts 1 and 2 are great ideas.

Its about time someone stamped out the mediocrity of some of the threads and posts.

I know you have shit on lockdown, Intro. Thanks for getting rid of the shitty youtuber threads.

they make it harder to get to my beloved Tamers thread

For a minute I thought you said you were notable in the Philly trans scene.

:^)

>>199652

His is.

Who do you think gave Rob GRIDS?

These are all splendid ideas for improving the board. Point 4 may also address one of the most severe problems that has been bothering this board since November. Namely these Gamergate personality that has hurt our feelings of the week threads.

I have been out of Fullchan since August. May I ask what happened with GG, are we still forbade of making fun of /pol/?

>>199741

Was there ever a real ban on that or just a consensus? /pol/ is a massive cancer, but is it funny?

>>199741

> May I ask what happened with GG

Its a long story. Better go into the /gamergatehq/ drama sticky and ask there. The gist of this all in very short is: GG according to /v/ reached 70% of its objectives and the thing is wrapping up. GG topics returned to /v/ proper.

Dunno about /pol/ itself. The more fertile ground seems to be Manosphere armchair machos and MPC if you ask me.

>>199736

>still have people shitting up threads with crossboard drama?

Sadly yes. Its a good thing that Introman decided to take a hammer to that major pain in the ass.

>>199468

>Shills taking over our board

>Banning redpill memes

Kek.

>//out// with you SJWs.

>>199612

Thanks man.

>>199736

It's not that crossboard drama can't be funny, but when it's used by boards like /ggrevolt/ and /pol/ as a personal army request. It becomes not funny.

>>199741

>>are we still forbade of making fun of /pol/?

When was that the case? It's more for people who scream about kikes and post national socialism grainy jpegs in threads that don't warrant that. That also goes for Tex-style arguing where they post a long screed about Ancient Jewish mating rituals in a thread about a babyfur. You can handflap the /???/ way in /???/(replace question marks with actual board name), but don't bring it here.

>>199785

Thanks /pol/ for adding quality points to the discussion. We wish you luck in your eternal struggle against the long-nosed demons.

This thread will end in an spiral of CUCK CUCK CUCK CUCK.

Quick guys, let's pledge our allegiance to the immortal spirit of Adolf Elizabeth Shicklgruber.

>>199802

They truly are heroes who saved us from the pink dyed menace.

>>199785

>(Stepping outside your ghetto without your Polhut and your yellow "le merchant" badge.)

Fucking LEL. Introman you're a fucking hero, out with the (/pol/) cancer, in with some real lolpigs.

>>199814

Mods = gods

Can I make a suggestion? About the whole politics thing since you might have retards screeching about this being a tainted board or whatever, just do what /a/ does and keep both /pol/ & and /leftypol/ posting out.

>>199873

This. It's time to gas the /pol/acks and the /leftypol/acks. If there's something amusing about them outside of their politics, fine. Otherwise, keep the circlejerk to your boards.

>>199873

>just do what /a/ does

That's not really a business model to aspire to

>>199915

I mean in their sense of keeping left and right posting out of their board and topics, they just want to focus on anime & manga, not the self politics behind its creators.

>>199468

>1

Bumplocking, but don't delete. They occasionally strike gold

>2

What determines whether a new repost is of quality or not?

>4

If it's a PA request, trash it. If it's funny, keep it. Allow merchant images. /pol/ has some actual humor, I don't really mind then as long as they don't start demagoguing. faGGots are pure cancer, ban them if they bring their faggotry here

>>199785

Nobodies triggered by the lolocaust, but thats exactly the kind of demagoguery I'm talking about.

2/10 for the replies

>>199924

>faGGots are pure cancer, ban them if they bring their faggotry here

Then remove yourself. All GG personalities brought up here besides Moviebob are either IRC-fags or irrelevant on 8chan. I don't thing /v/irgins will be banned here when they post how they supported Gamergays in past or are still Gamergays. This place's origin is 4/v/. We are perfectly OK with /v/ giving pointing out new autism.

>>200015

Laughing at GG/aGG is great, but when GG tries to use this board for brigading that's annoying

>>199468

I don't gots a name around these parts, but I'm sock#2 from that dante thread.

I used to be /pig/-centric around the Coffin days but I actually live close enough to where some of /pol/'s happenings occurred last year that some can't be ignored, so I drop for a couple months here and there.

Also I would say 1 should be appealable to irc, maybe. On the surface for instance, Jerry Peet is just an infuriating authori-contrarian, but when DWM happened pre-8chan and people dug, all kinds of crazy shit was exposed.

And sometimes like MrEnter, the crazy takes long periods to resurface because they're lazy. Enter's best moments will come if you hit him during a very recent and current review, or whenever he tries shilling that will-never-be-finished animation. He's normally more of a shudderpig minus the threats of self-harm. They can't all be blobs and coffins.

(though I do think for the most part "hot chick" tubers should be skipped over because if there's not a lot of information on the drop, OP just wants help finding their nudes.)

>>199578 Adding on to this, it's kind of disgusting how consistently hypocritical post-Pao reddit is. They said it was only FPH, wouldn't ban coontown, would only quarantine porn subs so you need to verify to get in. Well, frozen peaches or not, the entire chimpire got banned, and so did hundreds of porn subs. Unfortunately I think the porn subs that got banned weren't paying attention to the news or the revolt at all, because they didn't show up here or on voat.

Additionally: in their drive to actually earn some damn money for once by appealing to normier and normier interests, it's not the "severity" of the porn that gets banned, but the "SJ creep factor." Urophilia: ok. Scat: getting kind of iffy. Sexing up lovedolls and footfags: burn everything!

As the old saying goes, porn is the canary of free speech, and boy did that fucker squawk.

Another thing I noticed was the banning or takeover-and-shadowing-of-members on subs with specific sorts of "whhhyolence"

Yeah, you know what's coming.

not only are all the female-centric ones b& (beatingwomen circle of subs, the ryona-centric 3DCG ones too), but the cancer broke out of the site and SRS regularly launches pillaging fleets into youtube to find and flag all the ryona/abuse-play they can turn up. If your channel is under a year old it'll typically go down without jewtube caring to investigate. (ditto imgur albums)

8chan didn't seem to catch many of this wave, I presume they went back to fetish-specific sites like Necrobabes, or the nether regions of yahoo. (found the dollfuckers there for instance)

Didn't even care for much of what did get banned, just wanted to try and save then redistro as much as possible on the principle of the matter.

Fucking telling everyone what's already banned is all that'll be banned, and what isn't is free to stay…then the media attention goes away and the Stalinist tribunals came down in force. It really just fucking disgusted me, even though it's half plebbit's fault for continuing to trust their pocketeer moderation anyway.

Never seen so much trust pissed away at one time. All those tards thought Chairman Pao's removal meant better times ahead, instead it's just full on cambodian execution squads, soon as the MSM "web news" sites stopped paying attention.

>>199873

>>199921

that sounds impossibly retarded considering the themes behind Miyazaki's flicks. Maybe for babby weeb shit like Gundam and Naruto that holds up, but the mature shit from the 80s require it or are politically charged. (heck even some hentai like Wicked City got in on the act.)

>>200015

Butts is a goldmine. Not Sarah Butts by itself, but by "hurrrrassing" you find beardy goon spillage across the entire platform. Remember how many bonafide verified "academics" fell all over their asses to defend dat dur prty wimmin on the interweb after it posted that photoshopped pic of itself after being exposed as a paedo? So it pays to pay attention to butts' slipups and call them out.

Fuck sake it even got the twitter abuse faggot lusting after its manbutt. (hence why everyone keeps getting b& when they post that video to PeDont) Butts ain't a pig, butts is a pigbell

as to actual pigs, that badass digest dude is pretty great. He's the gommunist Phil Elmore, and fights just about as well.

(This seems to be common amongst internet renowned "toughguy e-celebs," remember how fast Lowtax went down against Uwe Boll?)

>>200029

>but when GG tries to use this board for brigading that's annoying

Yup. The problem here is, these people are effectively not Gamergays anymore. They have isolated themselves from /v/ since they have founded their board and then pissed /pol/ into the jack boots by not heeding their advice.This all I have to say. I am very sorry that /pig/ had to see that.

>>200101

>that sounds impossibly retarded considering the themes behind Miyazaki's flicks. Maybe for babby weeb shit like Gundam and Naruto that holds up, but the mature shit from the 80s require it or are politically charged. (heck even some hentai like Wicked City got in on the act.)

This is purely /a/ policy. Here is the thing: /a/ as a board doesn't care much of the outside world and wants laser focus. I am going to compare /a/ to /v/ a lot, because that is the board whose destiny /a/ doesn't want to share. Unlike /v/, they are not willing to discuss every path a topic could offer. Another thing aspect that makes /a/ so much unlike /v/ is the fact that they can't influence the industry pretty much. There is no snowball chance in hell. What they can do is establishing contact with the Japanese scene which can't affect the industry either.

I totally forgot other pathetic GG advisory that has been plucked out for mocking. Nowadays all we get are IRC fags or guys IRC fags don't like and no hardly any cocks on top of that. When the dust settles, we should entertain Homor's idea of a GG containment thread again if there is anything to get from that. As I said, 70% of the objectives reached and packing up. There will be no new clowns coming out of that for now.

>>200101

>Mature.

That little pesky word again.

>>200149

>And /a/ is not a good role model for moderation, its a hugbox full of angry wizards

Comes with the lazor focus on the topic. UC Gundam is serious shit indeed. There is so much that you can do with animu if just go wild explore all branches but /a/ won't play along.

>>199468

/pig/ has fallen to the SJWs.

Duly noted.

>>200276

>Thinking introman is an SJW

Lurk moar, faggot.

Got any stories about Null or Kiwifarms, Introman?

>>200364

I thought Null's super secret chan project was going to be a youtube archiver/twitter archiver suite. I was disappointed when I found out that it's infinity next. I legit don't understand chan software so it's not in my domain to criticize it. All I can say about the development is that the 3 person ship was sinking and instead of leaving/developing the project amicably. The 3 people on the ship decided to throw napalm at each other to inflict 2nd degree burns on each other. This shit was dumb and an indictment of never mixing business and personal.

The only other chan software board owner I know of is savetheinternet and he was contracted to make a CSS convertor to make 789chan archived threads not look like ass. He did give the benefactor a refund though, but I was confused. If you could make tinyboard, how hard is it to make a CSS converter?

>> Null

Null's personal filter to public filter is like 98%. He only hides about 2% of stuff to the public and the stuff he hides isn't juicy at all. In fact, I question the shit he keeps secret while publishing his deepest darkest secrets on the internet constantly. Anybody who hangs out on the kiwichat/irc chats he frequents know more about him than I do. I mostly stay in the back and chime in once in a while. I'm pretty much the Silent Bob of the Asperger's Sphere.

>>199566

Too many pinned threads is cancerous shit. They made the front page view of /baphomet/ terrible to browse.

>>199566

certain threads that involve current major happenings sometimes get pinned, though they usually don't need to be because they have the most people posting in them anyway.

If you loose track of threads easily, just use the catalog. This is a slow board, so most current threads won't get farther than 2 or 3 rows down anyway.

>>199468

> I'm making this thread to ask the user-base for their input.

Can we have flags? Like the old /christian/ had before cuckvol took over. It adds an extra layer of meta to my shitposting if I can say something and throw a random flag up there to piss off certain peoples.

/r/ing Commie flags, Nazi flag, Vatican flag, and Murkan Flag

Also I thought his name was TSFDante like the animu about genderswapping.

Every thing you said has already been done in other incarnations. They all failed and the userbase cannibalized itself.

Nice going though.

>>201903

And yet here you are.

>>201908

What quality?

>>199785

>asshurt kike mods ban people for dissent

Top kek. You faggots are a joke. Tell me more about how happy merchant triggers memories of you kikes being personally gassed six gorillion times.

What other memes are you going to start banning, schlmo? Do you not realize that somethingawful already exists and you can get your safe space niggertown there?

Better make sure only the correct narrative on events is allowed. Ban people en-masse for hurting your jewish feelings even if they make dank OC and contribute to the board. If it hurts the feels, has even the slightest twinge of right wing politics, is a "bad goy" in any way better ban it.

I shouldn't be surprised. A jewish actor Seth (((Rogen))) has an autistic meltdown on twitter and generates hundreds of posts of hilarity, and some fellow tribesman faggot autosages the thread. Don't you know you can only laugh at kosher targets goy? Only Chris Chan clones oy gevalt! Betta stick to the dozens of threads on the same unfunny faggot and ban all other types of pigs even though the board's so fucking slow there are threads from last August (6 fucking months) in the catalog that haven't been posted in for six months yet haven't fallen off the catalog.

Oh, make sure to ban this dissent too, I might have shoah'd the feelings of some g-d's chosen and we can't be allowing the goyim to disagree with their masters can we?

Ban >>201903 too, he knows this shit killed prior incarnations and spreading that info is like another holocaust.

>>202868

>>202867

Spergy posts like this is the very reason we don't want your Happy Merchants and autistic theories here. You are worse than the Assburgers who also used 4chon/new/. At least they had the common courtesy to keep their shit out of Yuro/int/.

>>202874

For the longest time they were protected as sacred pigs. I even saw it posted that "you can't troll /pol/. Fact is that if the mods if 8chan /pol/ weren't so quick to ban anything they found upsetting then they would be the even easier than wizards to troll. The more they step out of their containment hugbox the more obvious it gets. Every single /pol/ fag that's been doxed has sperged like mad. I think maybe banning them is the wrong approach. We should julay them.

>>202901

"You can't troll /pol/", oh boy! They are more ready to be triggered than your regular Tumblrite.

>>202904

I believe one of the mods must have been a /pol/ regular or something. Or maybe there was a fear that hot wheels would not like it. I don't know. I just know that they used to be treated as if they were off limits.

>>202923

During some time, /pol/ treat 8chan as their personal fief, maybe because the famous exodus was comprised mostly of /pol/acks, who can't believe we are tired of using the hackneyed terms "cuck" and "shill" in every post.

By the way, the Jew York Times just published an article saying Hitler had a micro pecker. I wondered if the boys are raging hard right now?

>>202938

That would explain so much. I doubt it's true though. That usually comes with more feminine features and Hitler was anything but pretty.

>>202901

>>202923

They've never been off-limits on any iteration of /pig/.

>>202867

"Targets," as you call them, aren't usually lolpigs, they're people you want to become lolpigs. We don't care about your targets unless they have the potential to become a lolpig.

This was the reason why Seth Rogen got a thread here, right? https://twitter.com/Sethrogen/status/645633501967052800

Last I checked, when one post gets hundreds of replies, we say it's that first poster who trolled the rest. Sure, the replies were bait too, but he didn't take that bait, and he definitely didn't keep taking bait as a lolpig would, so why should he have a thread here?

>>202971

That man does have a Twitter addiction, but his handlers keep that shit under control. Like with his little Justin Bieber spat. Luckily the man has friends and a companion to help keep him from flaking out too hard. Also luckily he doesn't do hard drugs like his buddy Franco. The last thing we need to see is him high on heroin or benzos posting nudes in the middle of the night and shit.

So long as he has that support system we won't see him going all Mel Gibson on Twitter. So he can't be trolled. But have you considered other members of the frat pack? Time will tell.

>>202997

Many celebrities are lolpigs, or weirdos, but, as you say, they have powerful interests behind them, that take care he/she doesn't go down like Chris, Nick, etc.

>>203031

Unless they go all Sheen or Gibson. If they kick all the support out from under them and decide to go it on their own then they had better be as stable as Bill Murray. Anything less and you'll get to watch an epic breakdown. The Hawthorne effect gives way to a breakdown from exhaustion from being monitored. I forgot the term for that, but it's why reality tv stars progressively go nuts. They start off on their best behavior, because they know that everything they do is being scrutinized, but over time this wears them down until they act out. If they don't it can actually lead to psychosis and an amazingly epic breakdown. Which is what the producers are really hoping for. If a celebrity chooses to live a portion of his life online then he's intensifying the scrutiny he faces. What would happen if we took away his pot? He obviously is self medicating. I'd say it's working because he hasn't had the breakdown, that we know of. His relationships don't seem strained. He's kept a more stable love life going than any other member of the frat pack. Yet he's probably the least talented and most famous.

>>203067

Judge Judy is Jewish? Also isn't she basically Jerry Springer with a gavel? The people sign agreements to settle based on her ruling instead of going through the proper court process. In return for this they get to be on camera and have fairly benign and fair rulings come down on them. All small claims but still a better deal than your lawyer could probably hammer out under other circumstances. So I'd hardly say she's wrecking America, even by /pol/ standards.

>>202901

/pol/ wasn't holy at any time. Its incarnation on 4chon was source of fun cocks for a fun thread on Ulilauta were we made fun of one of their volunteers accidentally committing suicide with his dad's gun on their tinychat room and the other people in it taking half an hour to call the cops. 8/pol/ just wasn't bountiful enough before the second exodus after this happened:

>>>/irc/2670

>>>/irc/2671

>>>/irc/2672

The Heh-pill raid was just the cherry on the top.

>>202938

The first /pol/ exodus was mainly /v/. It was almost nothing but /v/irgins. /pol/ was much better at that time. It was so good that I almost became a regular.

>>202971

>#cuckRogen incident

This was sucessful troll operation by some lifter. Nothing more, nothing less. This is exactly the kind of useless thread we were complaining about since late autumn. I agree with JEVVS; Such shit doesn't fulfill any purpose, because the person in question doesn't deliver any cocks and is not retarded enough to react to anything thrown at him.

>>203239

It's always a conspiracy. /pol/ is perfect and never spills the spaghetti in other boards, barging in like a bull, demanding we all pay respect to their redpilled maymays.

>>203239

We want both to go.

>Keep your board specific autism on that board.

>>203249

Do you have conclusive proof that all the shitposting is done by people from /pol/?

Nobody here gives two shits about "Tha Joooos". We care about people who won't stop trying to win a fight with people who don't have anything better to do with their time. That's why we have 9,001 threads on Null and MovieBob each.

>>203307

That would explain why people here still talk about Zoe Quinn.

>>203325

Im not defending her but she just isn't that interesting. She's just histrionic hipster girl number 4827981979. I went to school with dozens of girls exactly like her

>>203420

I know. But if you point out how some pig is boring, or unremarkable, you risk being chase off by the angry autists bitching about the angry autists.

Do you guys have some sort of morality/set standards?

Only few hours ago there was a thread about this 9 year old perverted pokephilic lolpig and it got deleted.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJrORhWCqvRjgr5xHN9sIng

With no explanations or reason given. Are we being infiltrated or do some mode remove threads for personal reasons?

>>203612

/pig/'s standard were lowered a lot when we entered the 8chan period. Many ignorant newfags who don't understand our purpose is to observe the drama created by other spergs. Nut everyone one here seems want to be the new ebik trollan.

>>203612

Because kids are stupid. Now, if he's 16 and still acting like that then yeah, deleting it would be moralfaggotry. But, fucking with kids should be haram.

8chan on its entirety seems to have been taken by high school kids who seriously believe the "redpilled" meme, and just want to be mastah trollan. Every board I visit I read the same retarded posts.

>>203645

Tell that Faggettssss not us. He is responsible for the board that houses them. /v/ and every weeb board is clobbering them were they can.

Why /pol/ is so stupid? They have a thread on /x/ where they pretend to be the X-Men.

>>203645

There has been pushback from many boards now over them thinking they have domain over every other board. Again, hate to bang on about it, but /a/ was the first major board here that didn't want any of it from either side. I rather like /his/'s push back as well. /politics/ is trying to get going again and avoiding what /pol/ has done which was cultivating a far right politics board. I will admit, it's better than the atmosphere of left/far left of /pol/ on 420chan which is just a super srs version of /leftypol/ anymore, but that's not saying much.

>>199610

Edf is mostly the same what's feels like 12 to 15 people all the time the wikis great but the forums suck no ever seems to make new threads and it's not as funny as you'd think

>>203728

This would be a good topic for its own thread that I rather cook up over the course of an entire afternoon than just wasting it in a reply that can only hold a little text. Here's the thing; The people who take over brainy parts of the internet and replace all cocks with simplistic quips are pretty much of the same type. Paranoid spergs who usually emit a special kind of retarded. You find them on every platform that discusses ideas, be it manosphere, NRx, Atheism communities and before that underground haxxor groups that just wanted to dick around on the web.

>>203753

Indeed. Weeb boards reject outside influence from the get go. /jp/ is another example of a board that rejects their influence.

>>203728

cause there autistic

Can we have a discussion about the over-abundance of MovieBob and Peter Coffin threads on this board?

My opinion is basically this: >>203666

Threads have gotten stale. Threads deteriorate into off-topic discussion more often than not. There's not really anything more to talk about because all the avenues of discussion about the cows themselves have been exhausted. Anons make new threads out of habit or because they actually hate Bob/Coffin and the latter is not what this board is about.

I'm not saying that MovieBob and Coffin aren't cows, they clearly are. I'm saying they're tired cows.

I propose we have a moratorium on those types of threads until either actually do something worth making a thread about (by which I don't mean 'They shitposted on Twitter about the latest outrage')

>>204532

I agree anon they have become boring to a point not say there not cows but right now there not producing julay for a 100 threads on the board

>>204532

I agree with you. One thing I have notice, several threads have been opens for just regular assholes, without anything noteworthy about the, except making Ops angry.

On the other hand, >>204558 this anon is also right, we are suffering from a shortage of cocks.

>>204559

There running out of stuff to sperg over since gg is at this point dead

>>199468

Jew detected

>>204896

No

>>204532

for sure the threads aren't going anywhere, and they pretty much just have /cow/boys posting in the thread about various interrelated topics, but without much else going on, I fail to see the issue.

The quality of posters has gone downhill as well.

>>205575

He must have a lot of lolcow potential if he's so paranoid that he thinks up a grand conspiracy based on one shit thread being deleted. He's probably a gangstalker or something.

Oi are you weeding out the userbase yet?

Or is that impossible since imageboard culture itself is declining in quality.

Fandom shitposters, pretenders and then some mo'

>>205575

>Calling you out for trollshielding is not "chimping out". Why the fuck should I have to come to IRC to get unbanned? Thanks for only confirming that you guys are corrupt power-tripping trollshielders tho.

That is the faggot's actual ban appeal message.

>>205575

why is Ralph's thread allowed to stay up, but an actual dog fucker is immediately taken down?

The guy crying and sperging over his precious dogfucker thread is quite a lolcow himself.

>>205629

I'm surprised that you're sore about your /cow/ thread when you're trying to use us and four other boards as your personal army. /baph/ and freech didn't care, of course, but it sounded like you got the response you wanted from /b/ and /v/.

Rewrite your OP with the cocks from the /b/ and /v/ threads.

>>205632

tbh fam I didn't write any of the OPs. My OP started with:

>GGRevolt Doxx Crew here

>This furfag pissed off the wrong GGRevolters, and now John Kelly and Robin Gething bring you another doxxing

My OP was scraped and instead they went with the OP you see on /baph/. I mean, what's wrong with framing /ggrevolt/? Everyone else does it.

>>205629

>>205633

People would take you more seriously if you didn't feel the need to spam memes for braindead children in your posts.

>>205635

I didn't even see the OP that was deleted, so I have no clue what you're talking about. Other members of the crew put it together and I was not involved. Some faggot deleted the thread calling out the mods with the archives to Sick Nick's posts on /b/ and /v/ defending his lust for doggie dick up his ass.

>>205640

>thread was designed by committee?

essentially. 40% of the things /ggrevolt/ is blamed for comes from one group that has no name. Most of the memebers of the group don't even post on /ggrevolt/.

The other 60% of the things that /ggrevolt/ is blamed for is completely fabricated, so it just adds to the myth of the /ggrevolt/ boogieman.

I have a question for mods, users and whatnot.

Since when anon cared about post histories, use their own naked IP instead of proxies or VPNs.

What happened to anon and this scene? I thought the idea behind /cow/ was that we all are faceless, nameless lolcow farmer anons.

What compels so many to namefag/tripfag, use twitter and start offsite or crossboard drama. Why this egomania is so standard these days?

I don't get it why people here sperg care about post histories and e-cred.

I focus julaying and looking into cows and soon-to-be cows because of this bullshit I see here.

TL;DR: Old Guard anons are non-existent here

>>205655

That didn't explain why the fuck people here insist using trips and/or name or why posters here sit buck naked (Without VPN/Proxy condoms)

Seriously fuck if you are out to spitroast pigs, one should have the common sense and browse/shitpost under a VPN.

Come on it's not too hard to leech off free VPN trials or proxies for 8chins.

The community is so different from what I remembered.

And oh I was was wondering what happened to anon mindset on /cow/. It feels like Kiwifarm without Null or "friendly" milieu. I mean it's like you wait to turn some users into pigs or entertain yourselves with in board drama and shenanigans.

Plus I didn't mention or claim to be ebin oldfag.

>>205650

>>205669

>What compels so many to namefag/tripfag

Trolling.

>Since when anon cared about post histories, use their own naked IP instead of proxies or VPNs.

Since we learned that lolcows post here.

>The community is so different from what I remembered.

/cow/ has always been this way. In fact, on one of our previous iterations, our IDs were board-wide, so anyone could find someone's post history. If I could enable that on /cow/ right now, I would.

>Seriously fuck if you are out to spitroast pigs, one should have the common sense and browse/shitpost under a VPN. Come on it's not too hard to leech off free VPN trials or proxies for 8chins.

I find not being a lolcow that draws a lolcow board's attention easier than constantly changing my apparent IP address, but that's just me.

I don't know what the criteria are to be an "Old Guard anon," but I can assure you that the reality of the matter is different from whatever you read on Buzzfeed.

So we can have a thread about the ralph retort but not shrek?

Kill yourselfs

>>205762

Better than a thread about a faggot that other hashtag faggots are mad about

>>205771

No, it's really not. You are seriously fucking underage, goddamn.