No.233271
/non degenerate/, pure. monogamous (in theory, bc no bf and virign tbh) and right wing, who else?
No.233282
Just because I have zero interest in girls and would rather fug a girly boy doesn't mean I have to support all that degenerate LGBT movement shit or be accepting and open minded. Fuck niggers, kikes and spics and SJW fucknuggets too.
Moonman is my god damn hero.
No.233286
No.233289
No.233292
>>233289
I dunno, there's a lot of cognitive dissonance/doublethink going on there.
Like politically I don't give a fuck what people are, but if you're from the Nazi bit of /pol/ and you're into the sort of thing on this board then that's kind of a conflict of interest.
No.233293
>>233292
Well do you want a straight /pol/ bf or not, fag?
No.233294
>>233293
>straight
>bf
You guys are a big fan of ironing I can see.
No.233295
>>233294
You didn't answer the question.
No.233296
>>233295
No, but me having a straight bf is kind of difficult when I'm a dude anyway so it works out.
No.233297
>>233296
just accept it, breh
No.233298
>>233297
You want to fuck a guy and that makes you gay as fuck, but you identify as straight, so you can never go public with your relationship, 'cause then people would find out and that's obviously something you don't want.
No.233299
>>233297
lol, why are you acting like I'm the one in denial when I know I'm gay?
Meanwhile if you posted any cuteboy shit on pol the shitposting would be astronomical.
No.233300
>>233271
Me. I struggle with this. I just want a qt /cuteboy/ to browse /pol/ with tbh
No.233301
>>233298
Maybe for you, I will. :3
Or maybe people will just suspect that we're really close for just friends?
>>233299
*just accept me
>Meanwhile if you posted any cuteboy shit on pol the shitposting would be astronomical.
yeah, you have the people with secret homolust there like
>>233300
the fag haters and the people who ignore it
>>233300
No.233303
closer to libertarian than strict right wing, but I hate leftists so much that I think it balances out
No.233304
No.233308
>>233306
>I'd want to hold hands in public and kiss each other goodbye
M-maybe I'm willing to do that.
No.233309
>>233301
lol, I'm too much of a leftie for you to want anything to do with me, tut mir leid.
No.233310
…what happened to my post…?
No.233312
>>233309
I can tolerate that, no use in limiting your dating pool even further.
I will probably feed you some redpills, since you enjoy having a "nazi" bf.
No.233313
>>233312
Where'd I say that I enjoy that? Also if the redpills have anything to do with the govt creating hurricanes with weather towers and power plants, no thanks.
No.233314
>>233313
>the govt creating hurricanes with weather towers and power plants, no thanks.
>being this bluepilled
jk
>Where'd I say that I enjoy that?
I know you guys have those fetishes, you haven't denyed it.
No.233315
>>233304
nah, people from my country can own guns
:^)
No.233318
>>233314
Honestly ideal bf material would be someone not overly masc or fem but willing to top and decent to hang out with n talk to.
No.233333
Gay reactionaries are the saddest fucking thing.
Be the change you want to see in the world and hang yourselves.
t. Leftypol
No.233334
>>233333
>tfw no leftpol bf to hatefuck
No.233337
File: 1450865188324.jpg (18.39 KB, 592x330, 296:165, The-real-thing-LGSM-membe-….jpg)
>>233333
QUINTS FOR THE TRUTH!
RIGHTISTS ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>233334
Sorry babe, I don't want to live in your selfhating closet ~_^
No.233354
>>233292
Well there really isn't considering /pol/acks unironically think the nazis disnt commit a single atrocity. Wouldnt be that far fetched if they also thought they were ok with gays
No.233357
>>233337
>Sorry babe, I don't want to live in your selfhating closet ~_^
I really don't hate myself. Also I'm NOT a nazi.
No.233361
>>233208
These threads always go the same way.
>>233208
No.233368
>>233292
>if you're from the Nazi bit of /pol/ and you're into the sort of thing on this board then that's kind of a conflict of interest.
How so? Contrary to popular belief, the NSDAP was not a puritan party. Even Goebbels said something on it.
That being said, >>233361 is right. We already have two ( maybe three) of these threads in the catalog. Duplicates should probs be baleted
No.233380
I am.
I think I'm just going to stick to women because I want children, but cute boy butts make my dick diamonds and I don't want to have a purely sexual relationship with a cute boy.
>>233292
There are pretty regular threads on homosexuality. I'm not a nazi but there were openly gay men in the SS. People who want to gas the homos are in the minority.
No.233391
>>233271
I'm a libertarian who hates the social conservatism Heartiste spergs about all the time, but I'm a race realist. I really fucking hate blacks as a group. I hate hypocrisy about race and IQ scores, denying that IQ matters. It's just like people refusing to answer atheists' questions all over again. I lean female but I really want shower sex with a long-haired male –the long hair is important–and those seem to be in short supply.
I have long hair but don't shave below the waist because it's a fuckton of work if I'm not having sex or doing something with said hairlessness. I can go full twink if needed.
>>233303
Oh god yes.
Oh, and I hate everything about modern SocJus. Does that count?
No.233416
No.233434
I just find the idea of a very close, meaningful friendship with a guy valuable. Moralising every situation in a Christian or post-Christian way does nothing and has essentially robbed us of true life and of the experiences of what it means to live in a healthy and virile way. This is the case especially in regard to homoeroticism and so on. There is nothing new about men being attracted to oneanother, and it is not morally ill for two close men to enjoy oneanother in an honest and moral way - the fact of the matter is that moral characters do not commit evil deeds.
Say I had a friend; a close friend who's in his late teens/early twenties as I am. Say we spent a lot of time together and we both held philosophically conservative views on life and of morality. That we objected to progressivism, to materialism, to the LGBT movement, to gay marriage, to immigration, et all of the typical /pol/-tier and beyond opinions.
What if I kissed my friend if we were, for example, alone hiking one day? Perhaps I love him and vice versa. Our choice there has nothing to do with society; and we both understand that our actions between oneanother have no bearing upon external society or the values of the collective. We share a deep bond and are extremely fond of oneanother, perhaps even sexually, and yet this is a threat to the values of a civilisation? Even if individually we are both honest, successful, masculine and virtuous, and later in life we would move onto starting our own families?
Obviously most of /cuteboys/ is just simple hedonism mixed with a bit of loneliness and a dash of narcissism. And it's a shame that something Hadrian, Alexander the Great, and various other now mythical men understood has been reduced down to this level. The fact of the matter is that it was the Christian moralizing of every sexual action in terms of biological gender and its implications, instead of youthful masculinity/femininity and its implications, which has in part facilitated the dumbing-down of male romance into the attention-whoring degenerate filth displayed on this board and the broader conception of homosexuality and homeroticism generally.
Sex should not be politicized. The natural survival strategy is heterosexuality, but the human soul is more than just the desire to exist, it is the desire to live. Homoeroticism in ages past was seen as a fulfilling of this tendency often between warriors who would literally die for oneanother. It was the sexual and deeper element one encountered between soldiers and men of soldier civilisations. A profound, spiritual bond. The Romans at the height of their degeneracy were the first to trivialize it as they then took this idea and commercialized it via their slave-driven economy.
Safe to say I'm a /pol/ack, I hate most of the people on this board. But given the proper circumstance, the pathetic nonsense spewed onto /cuteboys/ can be something profound and beautiful. Unfortunately it's not as common; our age reduces everything downwards into the lowest common denominators. Anything real, profound, deep, emotional or supra-emotional is suppressed to fit into the box of post-Christian materialistic consumerism and its shallow, hedonistic derivatives.
No.233447
>>233333
Reactionary as in reacting against the changes of the european enlightement that birthed a rejuvenation of antique ideals and philosophy along secular nationalism (fucking secular nationalism <3 )in the long run?
Sure, NRXers are the saddest, gay or not.
Reactionary as in reacting against the bullshit that is the modern left and ravenous communist leftovers from the 20s?
I think materialist LGBT fuckboys who spew forth the stuff of their local University-based society of professional victimhood along the fucknuts that use them for their political agendas deserve everything they get when they meet their fellow muslim proles at night at the busstation…
No.233451
>>233434
Nicely said, but I wonder if you are going to find someone who is okay with being your lover on the side while you (an he) has a family.
No.233453
>>233333
Quintriple confirms
Though I would say I'm neither /pol/ or /leftypol/, more of a centrist if anything.
No.233461
>>233451
Well, I read once an article about a gay pair in a conservative village in rural bavaria during the 60s(I think), which is a pretty tight social enviroment.
They made out with each other far away from the village, thus not getting in the line of sight anyone, the women knew somehow and some others assumed it the whole time though, but because the social expectations to each other in the community did not allow open transgressions such as divorce or dysfunctional families in general, being gay in the closet was seen as the lesser evil and quietly tolerated while everyone played his role.
A similar thing with my Grandparents, conservative upbringing, (Not sure if still closet natsocs) but after the childs were raised, the husband went seeing whores and she accepted it because breaking up was probably seen as the greater disgrace and both still were affected to each other in some dryer way.
Today, were such values decline and women will divorce quiet fast if they feel betrayed ( vise versa?) you will probably not get away with having a sidelover. (Cant hide such stuff forever), also it seems truly ammoral.
So I guess the best thing to do is to break up the moment you aquiered a family and only seek emotional ties again after the kids have been raised and the woman is mutally disinterested in anything but keeping a cohabitation out of habit and practical benefits.
Leaving her in the dust even though she still has a greater affection because you like the guy more is mean after all.
Eh, I guess some kinds of doublethink/secrecy may be good in a society in order to let smaller divergences from the collectivley approved behaviour pass without damaging the moral authority of it, but it shouldnt be at the expense of your wive/other persons you hurt with it in general.
Now I guess this only should applie to Bi's or the odd atray romance. Making fully gay people procreate seems to be a bad idea due to the aforelymentiones social dillema.
(Assuming were talking about the person's participating have not-so liberal point of view.)
Im tired, I probably wrote bullshit/morally incohesive , need to overlook it tommorow.
>>233453
I would have been a centrist the time my parents were in their teens, now im either a special snowflake or just a stiff bigot political wise.
No.233469
>>233434
Weird to see some of my own thoughts so eloquently put into words.
>warriors who would literally die for oneanother.
This is why I am here basically, I don't think a women could love me back like that, I just think they are incapable of that kind of irrational love, maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part.
No.233477
You see, traps are fucktoys. It might not be straight but it's not gay either if you want to fuck a pink, shaved, soft boypussy.
No.233511
>>233337
Cool, you can parrot Freud.
Now fuck off.
No.233554
>>233451
I see homosexuality/eroticism as being inseparable with youth. But as I implied, historical circumstance is central; we no longer live in such times.
>>233447
As a reactionary, you're wrong about us. We want a return to the social order of quite literally centuries ago - or, at least, we see that as the most natural and righteous state of being. We believe in inequality, in hierarchy, in a power-centric value system, and in masculinity. We are concerned with ourselves, though, as we don't generally believe society can be changed; we live in the Hindu Dark Age which is not a choice. The only thing for us to do is stay firm in our principles and ride the tiger.
>>233469
You're right regarding women and that situation. It didn't happen. The closest equivalents were the women of the ancient north who often fought aside or behind their men. Such practices died out, however, with the spread of Christendom.
No.233560
>>233554
The fact shield maidens got killed by bad ass male warriors and thus removed that genetical trait from our gene pool might have contributed to their extinction, like it happened with most war oriented genetical traits I suppose in both sexes, but I think in women the removal of shield maiden gene was a lot faster and wide spread then let's say the removal of the spartan gene in men.
Also I am using 'shield maiden gene' as the simplification of genetic traits that made women assume the roll of warriors in the past etc.
No.233563
>I see homosexuality/eroticism as being inseparable with youth.
>tfw 22 and still a virgin
fugg :DD
No.233570
>>233560
I don't believe it was genetic as it was cultural. All human beings have the capacity for self-defence and aggression, but those cultures pushed those traits to the surface as it was necessary in order to survive.
I was thinking about this in relation to pagan morality as opposed to Christian morality; how the former emphasises pushing the good elements of man to the surface, and the latter emphasises the suppression of the bad elements; and the effect this has on us and its observable historical implications.
Anyways, this really isn't the board for such discussions.
No.233571
>>233563
22 is still young. I'd say youth ends around thirty. That's where manhood really begins.
No.233582
Apart from being virgin (I had a girlfriend when I was 14-15), this is me. I'm also pretty confused, but that is it.
No.233653
>degenerate mess
>commie degenerate homeland
>probably have nigger blood somewhere in muh ancestry
I'm a /pol/ack, alright
A suicidal one
No.233725
Well, I'm a hell of a degenerate with my one, single true I-hope-for-life love.
But besides that, that's me, OP.
>>233333
But the change I want to see in the world is to bring back the pure, sublime ideals of manlove and (cute)boylove.
To restore and revitalize the old Western principles of homo love and buttfun as in great Greece and radiant Rome.
To restore the cultural heritage of glorious dick-rubbing.
And maybe to even add a little bit of that Persian boylove ideals and purity, sans pedophilia.
There's no need for faggy degeneracy, lack of restraint and libertine behavior.
No faggotry, but cuteness.
No restraint, but purity.
No libertines, but sublime homolove in liberty.
No.233726
>>233725
>>233653
>>233582
So many hues, so little time.
No.233790
>being /pol/
>not being /leftypol/
>thinking liberals are leftist
>not understanding the concept of surplus value, or, why are you hitting yourself?
>>233554
>We want a return to the social order of quite literally centuries ago - or, at least, we see that as the most natural and righteous state of being.
>most natural and righteous
You need to read more.
No.233804
>>233271
>/pol/ is fucking gay
Not surprised.
Funny how many threads you gays have about how you hate faggots so much.
No.233805
>>233554
>Oh boy I sure do love being a serf! This is really fun!
No.233807
>>233271
Go make a thread on /pol/ about your faggotry. I'd love to see the responses.
No.233809
>>233804
Nothing gay about fucking the boypussy of a cute boy.
It would be unmanly to not do so.
>>233807
There is one almost daily. One is about "cure the homosexuality".
I feel with them. I presume that they are different from me in the sense that they actually want to get fucked in the ass/suck dicks.
But I guess someone has to bear the burden.
pic related is what I think about it
No.233815
>>233804
>/pol/ is a single person
I want this meme to die
No.233830
>>233790
>being a leftist
kill yourself, for the good of your nation.
No.233894
>>233554
>We want a return to the social order of quite literally centuries ago
At that time the lads from pic related lived here.
Schiller wrote it sucked ass and explained why.
I thrust the most brilliant poets and patriots of our history more then the faggotry that is nrx-blogs when it comes to the depiction of fucking feudalism.
>>233807
/pol/ faggot threads are actually suprisingly tolerant, albeit they are seen as annoying now , because they crop up quiete often similar to the "h-hi /cuteboys/ im from /pol/!" threads. Probably made by the same kind of persons.
No.233950
Guys, this social elite wannabe posturing is pathetic. As pleb as it gets.
Why not actually climb the social ladder and influence things? Oh, that takes work and talent.
No.234062
File: 1451135188684.png (45.56 KB, 2000x1778, 1000:889, 2000px-Pink_triangle.svg.png)
>>233368
derp they put homosexuals in concentration camps, about 50,000. Germany obviously had an interest in promoting marriage and children, but they weren't all too keen on divorce, re-marriage, homosexuality or non-monogamy.
I find it lolzy that people who long for life in a fascist dictatorship make themselves feel better about the fact by pretending it's more like… a liberal democracy.
No.234082
Everything except the right wing bullshit :^)
No.234088
>>233271
Confederate state murican reporting in.
No.234118
File: 1451158945964.jpg (174.51 KB, 860x1145, 172:229, auto_diktator131440578718.jpg)
I'm willing to keep my sex life behind closed doors and my romantic relationships something I only talk about with very close friends, in exchange for living in a society that's functional, healthy, and non-degenerate.
People who can't put the good of society as a whole ahead of the good of their dicks or of their obsessive need for approval from people they've never met really annoy me. I'm not so mentally and emotionally fragile that I need validation for everything I do from total strangers, and I especially don't need validation that only exists because people are forced to give it to me (Question: Who would actually want to eat a wedding cake that someone only baked for you because the government threatened to ruin them if they didn't? I sure as shit wouldn't take a bite of that.) I'm not the center of the universe, and who I want to stick my dick in is not the most important priority in the world.
So yeah, I'm totally willing to have being gay go back to being like Fight Club - something that men do behind closed doors and don't talk about.
No.234268
>>233469
did you have a bad mother?
>>233271
I dont think im /pol, or reactionary, im not quite full libertarian either, and im definitely not normie lefty, cuckservative or SJW
I might be in some weird chris hedges-tier purgatory
No.236471
>>233790
Alt-right here ready to rape your leftie ass.
No.236482
I might be a faggot but at least I'm not black.
No.236516
>>234268
Oh, cute. :3
Irving is one of best Hitler historians.
No.236586
>>233725
Are you >huWhite? Want to text? If so, I can pass you my Skype. I'm going crazy because I almost have no friends
.
Just relax, I will not "attack" you (If you know what I mean), I just want to hangout.
No.236779
File: 1451948200449.png (86.63 KB, 1080x851, 1080:851, Screenshot_2016_01_02_02_0….png)
I'm not sure what I'd consider myself, but here's my political tests, I just really really fucking hate islam, I can stand any other religions but islam, it should be purged from the earth along with the sub human savages that follow it, also fuck immagration, I feel bad for Europe being whiped out by mudslides
No.236780
File: 1451948214773.png (478.1 KB, 1546x761, 1546:761, Screenshot_2016_01_02_01_4….png)
No.236783
>>236779
pew research has a political typology test out.
Turns out I'm a young outsider.
No.236790
>>236779
You don't have to feel bad for Europe. Thanks to social democratic and centrist capitalist policies the Germanic and Nordic European nations are the most prosperous on earth.
No.236909
>>233809
To my shame that is partly true
No.236918
>>234118
this. So much this
No.237806
>>236779
Are you me? Because I think you're me.
Actually I normally get a little further to the left, because I'm not over fussed if people don't want monogamy, either. I probably put too many "agree / disagree" rather than "strongly", too.
>>236780
What's this test? Looks more interesting than Political Compass. I can see those being almost my exact results, too.
No.249695
>>233271
Pure monogamous virgin Fascist in need of a husband here.
>tfw I will die alone ;_;
No.249705
I'm not from /pol/ but I'm a conservative. I want to combat degeneracy and support family and tradition. I don't know if homossexuality is wrong, but it's certainly a mental illness and should not be encouraged.
>you'll never have secret buttsex with your feudal lord in the middle of the night
No.249711
>>249702
>>249701
>masculine guys
Ew, gross. No thanks.
No.249714
>>249711
>>249711
How to spot a biscum: the post
No.249716
>>249714
>biscum
Better than being a fag!
No.249748
>>236586
Ah, sorry for taking so long. Didn't really see this thread in a long time and…
>Are you White?
Does it matter? I mean, I have a bf, it's not like I'd have to fit your aesthethic sensibilities, and you can judge my whiteness by talking about stuff! No actual melanin levels involved.
>Want to text
Well, if you still want to, sure~
No.249752
>>249716
>Brazil
Why is a non white speaking to me?
No.249761
>>249752
I'm of polish descent (father's side) and of ukrainian descent (mother's side). I'm pretty sure I'm white.
What about you? As far as I know you could be a fag and a nigger.
No.249803
>>233815
We know you're not one person, but we also know a very good number of you think alike. Not everyone here likes CD/Trapping but a fucking good number of us do. We're generalizing.
No.249811
>>249803
Anon generalizing is bad! What makes you think that you can base your opinion on a large and diverse group of people only on past encounters and statistics?!?!
t. /pol/pro
No.249820
Leftism is old and busted. The only choice for non-slaves is rightism. I don't need any LGBT movement to "free" me, and looking for someone to come along and make you "equal" is for slaves and losers.
Liking cuteboys does not require me to believe in plain nonsense.
No.249822
File: 1456989605850.png (Spoiler Image, 105.94 KB, 500x407, 500:407, perfect_trump.png)
What the majority of /pol/ masturbates to.
No.249823
>>249822
>censoring an image with a filename
lel
No.249835
>>249811
>>249811
where ever could I get the idea from? Madness right?
No.249868
> tfw no bf for reading cozy, old books, discussing philosophy and the books we read, staying in bed all day listing to cozy old RAC from the 90s that was so bad that its good again in a ironic way, browsing through flea markets for books and cool old stuff and hate the jews together.
One can only hope, right?
No.250504
>>233271
I go on there sometimes, and I definitely can't tolerate left-wing politics trying to treat gay people as a voting chip, and the fact all their policies are shit. That said, I don't really like /pol/acks that much, a lot of them have some weird superiority complex or something where they have to act really smug to verify their beliefs to themselves, it seems a bit tacky to be honest.
Polygamy is gross, also.
No.253366
polyamorous left-lib fag here <spoiler>who <i>totally</i> doesn't want to be made the cumslut of a fascist like the whore I am</spoiler>
No.253367
>>253366
>polyamorous
stopped reading there
No.253385
No.253388
>being a classcuck
I couldn't imagine fucking a bootlicker, the slave mentality really doesn't mesh well with me :^)
>>250504
>and I definitely can't tolerate left-wing politics trying to treat gay people as a voting chip
Liberals are a cancer on the left for that reason among many others.
No.253392
>>234062
they were against faggotry. that's only logical. besides, 50,000 people is nothing in the grand scheme of things.
No.253396
>>253366
pol-y
Ron Paul 2016 - "I've tried to warn them"
No.253400
>>253392
I don't think people should be actively working against their own self interest, and being put in a concentration camp is certainly against their own self interest.
No.253412
>>253400
>crushing pol dreams of a Nazi Germany where you could have gay sex with your ranking superior before going back to the common barracks while humming one of Bach's violin concertos.
CANADA NO!
No.253416
>>253400
>being put in a concentration camp is certainly against their own self interest.
So is starving to death under nearly every single leftist belief.
No.253427
fuck /pol/
i wish shit goes down next time you neonazi faggots have one of your little rallies around here so i can throw rocks at you, i hope you get stabbed
gas the kikes tho
No.253429
>>253416
m8 all I'm saying, all I'm saying okay, all I'm saying is, a lot of people are starving under capitalism, and capitalist countries have a way better hand than the socialist movements were dealt.
No.253437
>>253427
Make sure you bring that white flag for when you pussy out and run.
No.253439
>>253412
Why not full tankie? Cuteboy redistribution committee.
No.253441
>>253429
>a lot of people are starving under capitalism
Like in Venezuela right now? Oh wait they are lefties.
and when you try to feed them here what do they do? They buy crap. They use food stamps to buy chips and shit instead of getting good food for their families. The only way things can work in the real world are to provide for yourself instead of leeching off of the taxpayers.
No.253446
>>253439
i've switched positions. sniping anons from 10km distance like it's a safari
secretary of cuteness reporting - out
i want to watch Leni Riefenstahl movies with a qt
No.253452
>>253429
>A lot of people are starving under capitalism
And how many were murdered in the name of communism? 100 million or so last I checked.
No.253453
>>253452
watch it Anon, he'll post the reply of that with only one capitalist in it!
No.253454
>>253441
Venezuela is capitalist.
>>253446
>tfw getting high and watching american cold war propaganda
>>253452
I have bigger memes :^)
No.253455
>>253454
>Venezuela is capitalist.
You can't be serious
No.253462
>>253454
>>253455
>Venezuela is capitalist.
No.253463
>>253455
It's certainly not socialist.
No.253464
>>253463
>>253463
>Bolivarian Revolution
>Hugo Chavez
>state owns most of the food production
>United Socialist Party of Venezuala
Do you have to remind yourself to breathe?
No.253473
>>253437
nah the french whiteys can keep it :^)
No.253475
>>253464
>democratic people's republic of korea
>communist party of china
>the FARC
It's almost like they're not telling the truth.
No.253477
>>253475
ohhh, you meant i-it's not reaaaaal socialism!
No.253483
>>253479
top kek
Do you ever think about why Red China has been slowly moving towards capitalism, even after Mao's Socialist dream came true? Now why would these party guys (who own everything, being at the top of the party) start moving towards privatizing some things?
No.253490
>>253483
>china is socialist
>slowly moving towards capitalism
No.253492
>>253490
>china isn't socialist
>china hasn't been moving towards capitalism
No.253552
>>233271
Eh, I guess I am a right-winger, though I browse /politics/*not that nazi hugbox*