>>23306
>no space taken up for phone business (don't know if that's negligible or not)
That's pretty negligible.
>no backdoor entries left in by the manufacturer, security by being custom
This is mostly based on circumstantial evidence; these kinds of vulnerabilities get patched as quickly as they sprout.
>full control over the software without having to hack around an existing OS or blocks put up by the manufacturer
Also negligible.
>no limitations on size or appearance for marketability, or having to keep costs as low as possible
If that really wasn't important, then why haven't I seen more people wearing their DIYed wrist computers?
>>23307
>I've always thought it was silly for me to be using this device that had tons of features and functionality I don't need or want, and I also don't like carrying it around.
Assuming you use an android smartphone, why don't you just install a custom rom without gapps, configure permissions for all of the .apks that YOU chose to install and then encrypt the partition? I just don't understand the need for the level of specialization that which you're describing.
>I don't think an actual wrist mounted general-purpose computer is possible with present tech.
But it is; the number of applications available with root access for Android is impeccable.
>>23308
>If we're assuming that a wrist-mounted computer can do anything a smartphone can do, then a wrist-mounted computer becomes more preferable immediately because it's just schway.
I should have stopped reading there.
>You didn't just go down to your local Fry's and buy a normie consumer product that has already been preconfigured with shit you don't want or need and is filled with proprietary tech and software.
But I did, many times before and wiped them all clean for personal use. Don't give me that lovey-dovey shit.
>I think having that level of connection to the tech you use should be important to people like us
*Sigh*
>The computer you'd be using for this project doesn't constantly emit a signal and doesn't have backdoors
iirc chinese android smartphones are the only android smartphones that are known to have backdoors.. that and samsung but fuck samsung. The "constantly emit a signal" can be controlled very easily and you know that.
>On the subject of integrating with tech: This is about the closest we can currently get to having cybernetic augmentations.
You've already mentioned that elsewhere in the thread and despite it being a matter of opinion, I think you're wrong. Wearables aren't the closest things we have to cybernetic augmentations; subdermal implants are.
>Smartphones, although they are essentially computers, are not intended to be used as such.
No.
>They're made to be Facebook and mobile gaming machines,
No.
>and happen to be able to do real computing shit if you hack them
Yes.
>and even then, smartphones are clunky and not ideal for doing any serious computing
No.
>Not only on the software side of things
No.
>however, but hardware-wise you cannot do fucking anything
Yes, this is hopefully going to change over the coming years with the advent of modular smartphones.
>You also cannot upgrade anything except maybe storage.
Unibody designs are the cancer that is killing the smartphone industry, of course.
>With this sort of project, on the other hand, you can potentially have four USB ports, ethernet, audio, HDMI, USB host, and whatever other shit the board might have.
I don't see why you'd need your i/o to be that diverse on /a computer that is mounted to your fucking arm/. I don't know about you, but that would be far more clunky than doing the same with a smartphone and a couple accessories.
>Not only that, but you can use a fully-featured OS, whereas on a smartphone the best you can get is Android.
You mustn't understand all that much about Android then. What you're thinking of when you say 'fully-featured OS' just isn't compatible with that type of form factor. Even then, you can quite easily deploy linux onto an android device. Kali even provides their own arm-based ISOs you can tamper with.
>I imagine there will be more support on Linux distros than in smartphones
But.. android is based on the Linux kernel and Oculus has recently put all linux development of the Rift on hold. OSVR and Valve's OpenVR are all that's left for the meantime and their hasn't been much news on that front either.
>one could have a wrist-mounted computer connected to a VR headset with cameras and with your wallpaper as the feed from your cameras. You just augmented reality, chummer.
You're not going to be able to fit that inside that form factor for another five years at the very least you piece of drok. Lurk the cyberdeck thread if you haven't already.
>There are keyboards out there made specifically to be worn on the wrist, and they aren't impossibly expensive.
Yeah, one handed keyboards are still a thing; I'm pleasantly surprised.