>>33567
First thing I saw was "objectify women and children" which to me translates to:
>I don't want to have to compete with robots
It's really dumb that they believe they will be invalidated by machines. The consumers that will be for this would be people that can't form relationship with people or even last long in one. Most of these people that cry out against this wouldn't even be in a relationship them or ever know them, and vice versa. The only thing that might be a warning of them becoming invalid is when incubators can be installed and the consumers can be husbands to a mother machine and have their new kind of humanoid baby.
>>33565
This is how shit's going to go down.
>First bots roll of the market
Average citizen: lol fucking pervs can't get a woman
or
Eh, it's their life so whatever
Consumers: Finally, I don't need to work so hard for sex.
Anti-robo: THIS IS INHUMANE, I'M NOTHING BUT A BODY HELP HELP!!!!1
>Incubators come out
Average Citizen: Fuck that's some crazy shit
or
This just might be the future of us all
Consumers: I can be a father with a guaranteed loyal wife!
Anti-Robo(larger this time): THIS WILL DESTROY THE HUMAN RACE! ANYONE WHO BUY THIS IS A TRAITOR! DOWN WITH THE MACHINE!
In turn, a sexed up 2nd Renaissance occurs, only this time there shall be human males ruling their machine subject wives, hunting down those who do not accept the new order.
Or something along those lines.
>>33572
>Finally the sex industry is destroyed and women are saved. I'm all hot and bothered and my man's not home. Let's bring out my best rippled friend out~. Oh no… it's broken from the last time I was jamming it in! No matter I just order a… oh wait… damn…
The substitute is a increase in cheating, divorce and cuckold to fill in the power vacuum that was left behind by the dildo. Humanity is saved none the less!