/cyber/ - Cyberpunk & Science Fiction

step 1: buy nugget

step 2: buy ammo

step 3: use some of your ammo for shooting practice

step 4: use rest of ammo on drones

when you run out of boolets repeat steps 2-4

Or you can learn from ISIS…

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/moment-isis-militants-launch-condom-6683583

>>36207

drones are small and fast. firearms are loud. the cyber thing to do would be to hit it with a laser and the heat will make it melt/burn and then crash.

>>36214

Shining a laser into the sky is incredibly dangerous, especially the kind of 2+ watt laser you'll need to be able to do that, and you're not going to be able to keep it on a single spot long enough to do any real heat damage. At best, you'll destroy the camera.

Presumably, your goal is to destroy the drone, because fuck those niggas. Using an actual firearm will generally get you v&. Jammers these days won't crash them, they'll just make the drone perform a soft landing, or return to its origin via GPS.

While somewhat pricy, your best bet is to take embed related to it. Fire rate is absurd, at 8000 rounds/minute. The high spread combined with the high ROF means that if you're within range, you WILL hit it, unless you're unspeakably bad, and a single hit has a high chance to fuck up those fragile rotors. You can get them for standard airsoft BBs, or you can get them in .177 for normal metal BBs, which will be devastating. You don't need to worry about what happens when your round comes back down because the projectile is relatively light, and not actually moving all that fast.

plus,

>BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT

shoot a potatoe at it holmes

http://youtu.be/j1xJSsh24R0

hotwheels, no embed field on mobil holmes

>>36243

BB have a maximum effective range of about 100 meters. The drone has to be very close for that to work.

holy shit stop being autistic

just jam the fuck out of them

beat drone

with bigger drone

>pew pew

>>36250

And birdshot is even less, yet the most notable confirmed drone kill was a guy in Kentucky with a shotgun loaded with birdshot.

>>36263

You have to be close, very close. That guy took oit the neighbor's drone hovering in his backyard. What if it is hovering at 400 feet?

Birdshot is the right choice though. Super effective.

This might sound crazy, but there are stores that sell lasers. Now I'm not talking about the purple 3 watt balloon poppers, but a goddamn 100 watt infrared beam. The kind you can't physically be around if you don't have eye protection, this is the shit that makes you wonder how it's even legal. The beam can be focused down even narrower but you'll need a set of lenses that are crystal clear, else the beam just burns through them in under a second.

So imagine having a turret with said tube installed. Any takers? United Nuclear is one of the stores that sells these tubes.

>>36334

He has got it! Microwave!

>>36222

I would seriously consider the possibility of DIY mini SAMs for this task

You could also use cheapo drones as kamikaze units like vid related. It would be more expensive per 'shot' but then again using lasers or jammers can land your ass in jail while crashing a drone into another can be ruled out as an accident

>>36334

>Science supply stores exist

You don't fucking say, my man!

I don't know why everyone freaks out about drones. I've never seen one flying around, but maybe that's because my city is physically kinda small and has an airport in it. I imagine that would restrict civilian air traffic a bunch.

Y'know, instead of shooting stuff, why not use passive avoidance methods? Just close your damn blinds.

>>39167

>and its totally not cyber.

What if you use a scary black 'salt shotgun covered in fancy mall ninja attachments?

>>39182

>it's an accident means it's not a crime

it'd still be a crime and you'd still have fines and damages to pay, most likely.

>>39167

From what I have seen, most consumer drones use 2.4GHZ controllers. 433MHz is likely also used, but it is crowded and shared with hams.

900MHz/1200MHz/5800MHz is usually used for the video downlink.

And ya, legit large military drones use Ka-band sat for both uplink and downlink. IIRC something like 17GHz for downlink.

To jamm those you need to be above the drone.

Or jamm the uplink from drone to sat to blind the operator. But that's also quite hard. And then it would use GPS to go home.

>>36334

You need funny optics for the tube, and it's quite shit to build the multi kilovolt powersupplies those things need.

And even atmospheric scattering from the beam would blind people, so would 5th reflections.

Cover the area around your home in improvised power/network lines. Shit's a nightmare to navigate.

Better yet, hang a fine mesh over random areas. Nigh-impossible to see via camera, but it'll foul up a prop and it'll block a drone.

Camouflage. If the drone can't see you, it can't track you.

>>39167

You could make an RF tracking turret with a pair of semi-automatic 10 gauge 3.5" magnum shotguns and #4 lead shot (drones don't count as waterfowl so you can use lead). The shotguns would be fitted with long goose barrels and silencers to make it harder to find. You'd probably want to modify the shotguns to feed from hoppers. Total cost would be like $3000 if you could get a good price on the shotguns. $2000 if you have only one shotgun or if you're using 12-bore.

Stash the whole thing in an unmarked white van or a pickup truck with a bed cover and you're golden.

>>39218

>You could make an RF tracking turret with a pair of semi-automatic 10 gauge

It would just shoot the guy holding the remote unless unless the done had RF downlink for video.

>>39333

https://vimeo.com/33555548

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INDECT

police is fighting drones using drones with nets and other police is trying to train eagles.

>tor users can't upload images

i wonder if pedos are retarded or NSA spams cp.

>>40229

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5CzURm7OpAA?list=PL9fPq3eQfaaBuHqVvDzPoWxznYYmyx5UX" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

From Defcon 23, but only if your target is a DJI Phantom 3 or a Parrot Bebop

>>40243

…and apparently I can't into embed…

>>40244

click show post options & limits, copy youtube link into embed field.

Fit a cheap drone with a signal jammer and program it to automatically follow other drones.

>>40244

embed needs cancer so only jsfags do it. or was it the other way round? anyway, don't do it, just post the fucking yt link so we can copypaste it and watch it using livestreamer or download using youtube-dl.

cops are now using cannons that shoot nets which is probably the cheapest way to get a drone down, assuming it really works and they didn't just fall for yet another scam company selling useless equipment.

i also heard that during the kosovo war people figured out that they could bring down almost anything using a modded microwave. the only thing that went up was their cancer risk if they weren't careful.