[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/cyber/ - Cyberpunk & Science Fiction

A board dedicated to all things cyberpunk (and all other futuristic science fiction) NSFW welcome

Catalog

See 8chan's new software in development (discuss) (help out)
Infinity Next Beta period has started, click here for info or go directly to beta.8ch.net
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Young man, in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them. - John Von Neumann
Rules & Guidelines

File: 1447875940538.gif (6.1 MB, 408x408, 1:1, drowning in data.gif)

 No.37185

Does anyone else think that having no bump limit and refusing to make new threads is slowing this board down?

Bear with me here:

>Because there's no bumplimit, loading threads takes forever (and nobody wants to read the entire 1000+ post thread)

>Threads on the front page get deleted or locked because a thread on page 9 is about the same thing (and has stagnated)

>Because of this, people are afraid to make new threads (because the thread might get locked for being the same topic as another thread buried somewhere in the depths of the catalog)

It's the same thing that kills most forums–discussion of a topic is limited, because it's already been talked about in another thread and duplicate threads get deleted. At least we don't ban people for necrobumping, though that doesn't seem to be helping any.

 No.37189

I do agree to some extent that having a huge thread nobody new is going to read all the way through does stifle current discussion. Stuff like threads talking about certain technologies, where the older threads are significantly dated and the discussions in those have essentially ended (like the UMPC thread, other dupes of threads that are months old already).

On the other hand there is no reason to have multiple threads on the same thing that aren't focused on discussions, such as having multiple wallpaper/music threads or stuff like that. On the contrary, I would prefer that stuff to stick to one thread anyway.

I don't think dupe threads are being locked often enough to create a situation where people are afraid to post new threads though. I'd have to ask for examples of that.


 No.37193

>>37189

Hrm. Maybe have one thread for wallpaper/music/etc, and then dupes of other threads are okay?

Then again, one of the examples that drove me to post this thread was the wallpaper thread that got locked because another, much older wallpaper thread was still in the catalog. There was still discussion and contribution going on in the old thread–which was kickstarted when the new one disappeared–but it was a lot slower and didn't have nearly as many actual wallpapers in it.

Maybe we just need to sticky the wallpaper/music threads, and let the rest of the board work more like an imageboard.


 No.37194

>>37193

My policy is not to really care about the age of the thread. I don't like having a hard-and-fast rule about that sort of shit. If someone makes a dupe wall/music thread I guess I wouldn't be too bothered but personal preference would be to just keep bumping the old one.

On the other hand I would have to say that having more than a few stickies for the most necessary stuff (rules, meta and such) would not be a good idea.

I think that posting habits are going to be what changes, I would rather have that than a change to the actual rules.

So on that part I suppose I could agree that refusing to start new threads does slow down the board a bit. For example the guns thread is already on page 12, and that was a very active thread for a time… but I wouldn't mind if someone started a new one now.


 No.37196

I agree with you OP.

There should be a post limit, it would be fun to have different topics having different post limits, but then, that is what stickies, renewable threads are for.

I never liked the rule that limited only one thread per topic, the community should be the one deciding that with their activity. What if one non post first and another makes a better opening post with more activity latter? Honestly, this specific rule is very un-cyber and more fit to the megacorps we pretend to rebel from.


 No.37391

>>37196

>the community should be the one

>refers to everything as "I"

WE did decide as a community to avoid having 10 threads shitposting about the same topic, if the [bottom] button is available big threads aren't an issue. Jesus you shazbots are all twelve.


 No.37398

File: 1448371585744.gif (141.84 KB, 300x199, 300:199, do not want.gif)

>>37185

I really like this board.

I liked it even more before that porn spammer started posting threads about "lolitas."

I've been reporting that crap - as far as I can tell it is a global rule violation.


 No.37416

>>37398

You've made me depressed about the fact there will never be any more of that anime.


 No.37418

>>37398

sauce of gif?


 No.37446

>>37391

>OP asks for his opinion

>he writes it in first person

Seems English isn't your native language.


 No.37451

>>37398

I do my traditional thing of posting bara into the thread so it gets closed.


 No.37465

>>37185

>and nobody wants to read the entire 1000+ post thread

>>37189

>a huge thread nobody new is going to read all the way through

Remember, remember the September of 1993. And this is why every time I see "guise were 2 slow how bump PPH were dieing pls halp tbh smh!!111" I get this sudden unexplainable homicidal urges.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]