>>9554
>People who want futa would go to /futa/
>>9555
>Except they didn't. And people who don't want futa didn't go to /nofuta/. Where are all these people who supported the split? Why aren't they on one/both boards now?
Now, while I support separation of /futa/ and /d/ (especially that real futa consumers don’t care whether their porn is manga or Western), I must admit that that anon speaks truth. The sad reality is that very few people who like futa are dedicated to futa exclusively. Most are indiscriminate deviants and psychopaths. But maybe the reality of super slow /futa/ is better than the illusions of community produced by /d/? I still think that absence of indiscriminate deviant crowd on /futa/ is a feature, not a bug.
The only case when I could be tempted to post futa on /d/ instead of on /futa/ is when futa is already being posted on /d/, because you have no choice on which board to respond to already existing posts. One example: Elzi thread. A non-hostile futa ban on /d/ could solve it.
/d/ should display information about /futa/ at the top of every thread, in the board header.
Or maybe a “soft ban”, i.e. individual users kindly reminding futa posters in /d/ to use /futa/ for this purpose?
>>9567
>Shitposting. I've already answered your question and explained myself.
Let me see... Oh, you are talking about >>9549 . This topic is getting long. Maybe someone should make an impartial overview of this controversy. This would help the conversation avoid running in circles.
>>9549
>Would people who only want tentacle stuff care if futa was gone?
>What about diapers or nipple penetration? Or traps, or slime?
1. On one hand, this is true and I can confirm that I don’t care about other fetishes.
2. But, on the second hand, most /d/ “crowd” is a “glue” comprised of indiscriminate deviants. Without it, specific niches are comparatively “dead” (a very relative notion really). These deviants grant only a false sense of life to futanari (and other niche) threads.
3. However, on the third hand... >>9548 . How can /monster/ and /hypno/ be so busy without that “glue” of indiscriminate deviants? Or maybe deviants are not so indiscriminate after all, so they go to other boards more actively than to /futa/ (which is about as “deviant” as gay sex)?
>The same reason I haven't enforced a futa ban applies here: it would make /d/ too small.
>/d/ slowed down because people were leaving, it wasn't slowing down because there wasn't any futa content.
These two statements appear to contradict each other. The second line implies that /d/ couldn’t become too small from a futa ban (only for unrelated reasons).
>>9539
>The truth is the split absolutely killed the board, as anyone who was here at the exodus can attest.
I’m unconvinced, but it could be due to a deficit of my insight. Does futa need indiscriminate deviants (such as diaper wearers) just because they can populate pollute futa threads? User base quantity? Or user base quality? Admittedly, that’s a moot question to ask when the traffic is below reasonable/critical threshold.
So many questions, so little answers... Running a futa community is apparently a rocket science. Maybe we should focus on flying to Mars.