/deepfreeze/ - DeepFreeze

Forgot to add that I think it's more accurate if it fell under sensationalism.

>>338

>How exactly does this fall under corruption?

Colin either due to ignorance or on purpose, misconstrued many of the concerns about the Mass Effect issue that led to the creation of the video. He was part of the group of game journos and pundits that went out of their way to ignore legit concerns to present and push the entitled gamer myth.

>>423

Still doesn't seem like enough evidence to suggest corruption, unless those groups of journos were paid by EA or Mass Effect devs to shill for them. Collusion and sensationalism sure but still seems inaccurate to fall under corruption.

>>426

Because it's obvious that he was shilling for them?

>>426

>Collusion and sensationalism

This type of nonsense should not be in journalism. There is a reason why such things are generally frowned upon in society, let alone journalism. I don't understand how anyone can defend that.

>>442

Oh I wasn't trying to defend what he or anyone else did, it's tagged with corruption on the page, I was suggesting the tag be changed as there isn't definitive proof to show they were paid to shill.