Could we have a page explaining the power of MetaCritic? And through MetaCritic the power these journalists get? The page of Arthur Gies has me on the fense due to the fact he wrote his reviews based on his feminist pov which isn't unethical but unfortunately has way too much influence on the success of a game due to the MetaCritic score that aggregates his review just because its on a big site. In other words his review isn't really a problem but MetaCritic itself which gives powers to the professional reviewers instead of the consumers say Rotten Tomatoes. They both have a critic score and an audience score. MC holds the critic score higher RT holds the audience score mainly. In the end we want DeepFreeze to be neutral as it can be. We don't want to be thought police. They can have their feminism but in the end want our informed choices.
Thank you for reading.