>>87
He has a consulting company. No longer writes.
Sounds at least worth checking. Maybe I'll peer review.
Here's the original interview.
https://archive.is/oUS2h
Here's Neogaf
https://archive.is/3CrWq
Here's Kotaku
https://archive.is/z6czb
Bonus: doesn't have anything to do with Croal, but guess what future hearder of corrupt journos started the moral panic before him. No, guess.
https://archive.is/y00BL
>I've watched this trailer several times and I keep having the same difficulty. It doesn't make me say "That looks cool!" And it certainly doesn't make me say "I want to do that!" Maybe a subsequent trailer will. But not this one.
>My problem is that it presents a fantasy I don't desire. It looks like it's an advertisement to virtually shoot poor people. I know "Resident Evil" games are supposed to be about hiding from and shooting zombies – this one probably is too. Shooting zombies is something I can get behind, just as I can support video game fantasies of shooting Nazis or even causing mayhem in a big city. But when I see a town of what looks like impoverished African villagers – the very image of global poverty, the very spectacle that since my youth has been coded in me to evoke sympathy and charity – I don't want to pull the trigger.
If you're disturbed by shooting a poor African but not at all by shooting a poor Spaniard / Mexican / Japanese / White guy, you've got a kind of moral dissonance going that you should get fixed, or you may end up 7 years later so insane that you say a journalist having an affair with his subject (that he's known for years) a few days after the article is not a breach of ethics.