/ebon/ - Ebony Girls

anyone know any good sites for this kind of thing?

>>1625

This kind of thing being black women?

I'd probably get lynched for saying this, but Reddit; For generic hot chicks there's /r/DarkAngels/, /r/Ebony/, /r/WomenOfColor and /r/Afrodisiac. If you want hardcore there's /r/womenofcolorXXX, and if you want hardcore without the chance of black dick there's /r/BlackChicksWhiteDicks/.

If you want more you can check out /r/NSFW411/ to find more subs catering to your needs.

Almost dead. I believe all the black porn webms in existence are archived here.

>>1630

Or more likely, people have a shit ton of boards to choose from and the biggest demographic on this site, being white men, aren't usually attracted to black women.

Shame really.

>>1641

agreed. Black girls are considered unattractive because of latent racism. There's nothing wrong with black goddesses.

She looks like a super thick Kerry Washington. I'm very interested

>>1642

Actually they are considered unattractive because of latent evolutionary drives to procreate in a manner that improves the offspring. I like black women, but frankly I would never marry one, they, for the most part, are obnoxiously loud, lack self awareness, and have poor work ethics. This is from my own experience, living in an area that is predominately black (80%), and going to a highschool that is predominately black. Not to mention the rate of STDs among the black population here is the second highest in the country. Birds of a feather should flock together, and people of a color should do the same. There's a reason european's found blacks and not the other way around. Destroying your genetic line, and denying a heritage to your child is cruel and meaninglessly destructive, not to mention you run the higher risk of giving your child inherited genetic predispositions to a huge amount of mental diseases, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, a massive amount of personality disorders etc. I mean, do what YOU want, but its stupid, I'll fuck around without condemning my future offspring to subpar genes.

>>1651

>for the most part, are obnoxiously loud

they can have outburts, but not all black women are trashy and ghetto

>Destroying your genetic line, and denying a heritage to your child is cruel and meaninglessly destructive

Genetic lines eventually all converge. I find having diverse looking children enticing and the future norm.

>higher risk of giving your child inherited genetic predispositions to a huge amount of mental diseases, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, a massive amount of personality disorders

Wouldn't that be higher in the offspring of more closely related parents?

>>1651

> There's a reason european's found blacks and not the other way around.

Subsaharan Africa is unfortunately extremely inhospitable, yet incredibly resource rich. Europeans got ahold of Africa to get at the delicious resources, like rubber.

> Destroying your genetic line, and denying a heritage to your child is cruel and meaninglessly destructive, not to mention you run the higher risk of giving your child inherited genetic predispositions to a huge amount of mental diseases, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, a massive amount of personality disorders etc.

I'm American. That's my heritage.

The only bad genetics are excessively narrow ones. Diversity only improves a genetic stock. My descendants would be more healthy than I am, on average, if I reproduce with someone (including a black woman) genetically different from me.

I also doubt the mental diseases you're describing are a result of genetics. Most likely environmental factors matter a lot more.

Economics is everything.

That's not to say genetic disorders don't exist, they're just incredibly rare. Unless you're marrying someone you're related to, genetically, it's a waste of time to worry about them. Or if you can't stop worrying, just get a genetic screening.

>>1652

>>1654

>diversity only improves genetic stock

>the only bad genetics are excessively narrow ones

This is wrong. A Pitbull and a poodle don't make a good dog, they don't improve genetic stock, and their 'widened' gene pool doesn't make them superior in any way. Its the same in humans, 'wide' genetic stock (not wider, or wide, just mixed) is not a good thing. For instance, neanderthal DNA is thought to cause headaches, depression, and allergic reactions, a remnant from their immune genetics; It worked great in them, but fucks us over. Frankly I would not risk something similar happening to my kid over a fetish, ghetto ass african genetics should stay intact, and away from me.

>genetic lines eventually all converge

They don't, normal people don't miscegenate, having a child whos half only alienates him from both sides, and leaves him/her feeling robbed a heritage. People's strongest asset is a sense of closeness, community, and identity, these are the result of looking alike, acting alike, and being raised in a community of people like them. Why do you think homogeneous countries always do better in the long run? My city is a shithole, and the primary reason for this is the fact that nobody trusts each other, and if I go out on the street I run the risk of being mugged by a nigger and stabbed by a short ass ching chong in the same night. Not a day goes by I wish I lived in an exclusively white area.

>I also doubt the mental diseases you're describing are a result of genetics. Most likely environmental factors matter a lot more.

You cannot get a mental disorder from environmental factors alone, you are born with a potential for disorder, and whether or not it appears is determined by events in your life. Blacks carry genes for a higher risk of certain genetic diseases, mainly mental retardation, and mixed children get it in higher rates. Statistics are blind however, a reason for this could be that only retards miscegenate.

Why the fuck are people coming here to talk about fucking White Nationalist bullshit? this is a porn board that's barely active. don't you have anything better to do?