[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/econ/ - Economics

Economically IIliterate

Catalog

See 8chan's new software in development (discuss) (help out)
Infinity Next update (Jan 4 2016)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Board Rules
Other boards you may like: /poverty/, /oc/
/txt/ is having a board confederacy project going on right now

File: 1424378089012.jpg (57.73 KB, 800x522, 400:261, walmart.jpg)

 No.57[Reply]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/20/business/walmart-q4-earnings.html?_r=0

Buffeted by a tightening job market, high employee turnover and scrutiny of its labor practices, Walmart, the largest private employer in the country, said on Thursday that it would increase wages for a half-million employees.

The retail giant, which for years has been the target of widespread criticism over its low pay structure and increasing reliance on part-time workers, said that all of its United States workers would earn at least $9 an hour by April.

While the company said about 40 percent of its work force, or 500,000 people including those at the wholesale Sam’s Club outlets, would be affected, many of those raises will amount to much less than a dollar an hour more. A mere 6,000 employees receive the federal minimum of $7.25 an hour. Its part-time force already earns an average wage of $9.48, and full-timers an average of $12.85.
Continue reading the main story
Related Coverage

In November 2013, Pedro Taverna took part in a protest for better wages outside a Walmart in Los Angeles.
Income Inequality: As Walmart Gives Raises, Other Employers May Have to Go Above Minimum WageFEB. 19, 2015
Protesters outside a Walmart in Washington were among the thousands who demonstrated against the retailer on Friday.
On Black Friday, Walmart Is Pressed for Wage IncreasesNOV. 28, 2014
Customers at a Walmart in Qingdao, China. Net sales at Walmart’s international business grew 1.7 percent in the last quarter.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.58

Woops, pasted some unnecessary info by mistake.

 No.94

>>58
I wonder if Walmart would ever do something like this in my country. We don't depend a lot on walmarts, but since their introduction a couple of years ago many young people have gotten into the workforce thanks to them.

 No.104

>>94
Where do you live? The answer is probably not. At least, not without some kind of outside pressure for them to raise wages.

Walmart is really only doing this to look good and because of their high turnover and political pressures to raise the minimum wage.

Unless some of those things happen in your country, I highly doubt Walmart would voluntarily raise wages.

 No.131

even Mcdonalds will pay more than 9$ an hour and give fun benefits.

 No.154

>>131
That must be the reason my Wal-Mart's able to sell everything to me so cheaply.



File: 1425762449615.jpg (41.54 KB, 479x720, 479:720, 1380697092809.jpg)

 No.148[Reply]

http://rt.com/usa/238697-americans-labor-jobs-report/
pic not related

The number of Americans aged 16 and older not participating in the labor force hit 92,898,000 in February, tying December’s record, according to data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

Over the longer trend, the labor force participation rate was between 62.9 percent and 62.7 percent from April 2014 through February, and has been hovering around 62.9 percent or lower in 13 of the 17 months since October 2013, the BLS data revealed.

To put it another way, when President Obama took office in January 2009, there were 80,529,000 Americans who were not participating in the workforce, which means that 12,369,000 US citizens have left the workforce since then.


 No.136[Reply]

What do you think of this?

http://sozialoekonomie.info/Info_Foreign_Languages/English_1/english_1.html
>In his main work, Die Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung durch Freiland und Freigeld (The Natural Economic Order through Free and and Free Money), published in Berlin and Bern in 1916, Gesell explained in detail how the supply and demand of capital would be balanced in the case of uninterrupted currency circulation so that a reduction of the real rate of interest below the presently existing barrier of around 3-4% would become possible. Gesell used the term "basic interest" (Urzins) to denote this pure monetary interest rate of around 3-4% which is found to vary little historically. It represents the tribute of the working people to the power of money and gives rise to levels of unearned income far in excess of that suggested by its magnitude. Gesell predicted that his proposed currency reform would gradually cause the "basic interest" component to disappear from the monetary loan rate leaving only a risk premium and an administrative charge to allow lending institutions to cover their costs. Fluctuations of the market rate of interest around a new equilibrium point close to zero would allow a more effectively decentralised channeling of savings into appropriate investments. Free Money (Freigeld), a medium of exchange liberated from the historical tribute of "basic interest", would be neutral in its impact on distribution and could no longer influence the nature and extent of production to the disadvantage of producers and consumers. Gesell envisaged that access to the complete proceeds of labour brought about by the elimination of "basic interest" would enable large sections of the population to give up wage- and salary-oriented employment and to work in a more autonomous manner in private and cooperative business organisations.

 No.145

I very much like the idea, as well as most of "Third Position" economics, such as the Social Credit idea by Douglas.



 No.127[Reply]

http://www.peterleeson.com/An-arrgh-chy.pdf

It's about the laws and economics of pirates.

Some excerpts:

Several important features stand out from these examples of pirate
articles. First, they created a democratic form of governance and ex-
plicitly laid out the terms of pirate compensation. This was to clarify
the status of property rights aboard pirate ships and to prevent officers,
such as the captain or quartermaster, from preying on crew members.
In particular, making the terms of compensation explicit helped to cir-
cumscribe the quartermaster’s authority in dividing booty.


Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1424331299276.jpg (587.88 KB, 1232x1232, 1:1, BC.jpg)

 No.35[Reply]

>inb4 "how do I bitcoin mining?"

This is something else:
I sort of understand the basics of the Bitcoin system from the monetary view point, but I would really want to know more about it. Any econ lurker willing to take me deeper (no homo) into the Bitcoin scheme? pleasethankyou.

I have 3 specific questions:

1. How come the federal government doesn't crack down on it? Isn't it counterfeit money? Like the liberty dollar? Yay or nay, why?

2.How do people calculate Bitcoin parity? Being deregulated and marginally used, how are the ups and downs on its value calculated?

3. Is it only me or the whole thing seems extremely fishy?

 No.49

>>35
1. The governments in many places are trying to regulate bitcoins. China's central bank policies have made it illegal to use bitcoins, unless its between private individuals. If you're a bank or the government thinks your company is too shady, it won't allow you to use bitcoins. Governments around the world are definitely cracking down on bitcoin with regulations, including places like the U.S.

2. Bitcoin parity is mainly determined by supply and demand. Think of it like a stock market.

3. I think the idea of bitcoins is neat and that there is nothing inherently shady with bitcoins themselves, but the exchanges you use can often times be scams or fail. I don't trust bitcoins enough to replace most currencies today, like the USD.

 No.122

File: 1424576120232.gif (2.94 MB, 350x268, 175:134, 1386382359223.gif)

>crack down
I know when they seized Silk Road they were able to snatch Bitcoins that users had stored or whatever on the servers. Can't really remember, but if they can, they'll take them. Other than that, it's largely ignored.

>Bitcoin parity

http://coinmarketcap.com/
Markets are regularly evaluated and adjusted.

>Is it only me or the whole thing seems extremely fishy?

You better fucking believe it is. One of the problems you'll run into is exchanging them for currency or commodities. If you're just going to circulate Bitcoins within systems that accept them, the only thing you have to worry about is whether or not you're just giving free shit to scammers. If you're fixing to sell whenever everyone else starts selling, you're fucked.



File: 1424551571621.jpg (254.35 KB, 1200x800, 3:2, r8lms.jpg)

 No.109[Reply]

Hey guys, looking for some advice on future stuff. I was looking into investment banking, because of the cash, but then i realized the hourly is piss poor because you're typically working 100 hour weeks and i'm not into that. I have no motivation for a job, main goal is money and i seem to pick up things quickly so i can probably migrate to something better. My college is paid for thanks to my psychiatrist grandfather so if you had a choice to be anything you wanted to be, what would it be? (Ithaca is most likely the college i'm going to, so if that helps with the job search i figured id include it) (also, sorry this is poorly written, house of cards is distracting me)


File: 1424142236456.jpg (127.91 KB, 790x756, 395:378, 1416284763219.jpg)

 No.30[Reply]

This board has so much potential and yet it's completely dead

Can we start advertising on /pol/ /news+/ etc? because I think this could be really great
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.36

>>31
The fact that they were being ignored should have given you a hint as to how creating a board around the concept would swing.
le supplements and demons

 No.39

>>31

You're better off tbh. Unless you wanted this board to be a constant Austrian-school circlejerk.

 No.44

>>31
/pol/ is batshit insane, try /leftypol/ or some of the other less-nutty politics boards

 No.99

advertise on ol, lefty, polpol, and other big boards

 No.105

/poverty/ here, you're free to advertise on my board



File: 1424489957728.png (72.66 KB, 210x200, 21:20, 1423447400933.png)

 No.100[Reply]

Congratz on the 100 posts anons. Keep the economy stronk .


File: 1424472935656.jpg (125.71 KB, 606x604, 303:302, 1421645057538.jpg)

 No.90[Reply]

According to the official poverty measure, the states with the highest percentage of people in poverty in the 2011-2013 period were:

1. New Mexico: 21.5%
2. Mississippi: 20.7%
3. Louisiana: 20.6%
4. Arizona: 18.9%
5. Arkansas: 18.7%
6. Kentucky: 18.1%
7. Tennessee: 17.8%
8. Georgia: 17.6%
9. West Virginia: 17.4%
10. South Carolina: 17.3%

The regions with the highest percentage of people in poverty, regions being defined by the U.S census Bureau, are:

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.97

thx for the insight



File: 1420773209062.webm (4.81 MB, 640x480, 4:3, bioshock.webm)

 No.18[Reply]

You won a free ticket to see a Beatles concert (which has no resale value). The Rolling Stones are performing on the same night and is your next-best alternative activity. Tickets to see the Rolling Stones cost $40. On any given day, you would be willing to pay up to $50 to see Rolling Stones. Assume there are no other costs of seeing either performer. Based on this information, what is the opportunity cost of seeing the Beatles?

A) $0

B) $10

C) $40

D) $50

Keep in mind, even real economists get this question wrong. I changed the name of the bands playing so you can't easily look up the answer.
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.41

Isn't the opportunity cost of seeing the Beatles 0, or A, because the ticket is free. Or the opprtunuty cost of the rolling Stones, at 40 bucks, be at 40, because the opprunity to see them, over a similar form of entertainment was 40 dollars.

I'm more used to looking at opportunity costs in terms of earnings, where I can work a night and make 88 dollars, or I can stay home and Jack off. The cost of beating it was 88 dollars, but my net enjoyment of life went up so my "money" was well spent, though I'd probably be happier with the 88 dollars.

For the concert scenario, free ticket for a band I like just a little less than the rolling Stones? I'm saving 40 dollars, if anything.

How dumb am i?

I still think it's A

 No.47

>>18
It's B, $10.

The opportunity cost of seeing the Beatles is the total value of everything you would have to sacrifice in order to go to that one; specifically, that is, the value to you of seeing the Rolling Stones. That value is $10 - $50 that seeing the concert would be worth to you minus the $40 you would have to pay for a ticket.

 No.60

>>41
Normally, you are willing to pay 50 dollars to go see the rolling stones, but you'll be able to save 10 dollars because tickets are 40 dollars. If you choose to go to the beatles concert instead of the rolling stones, you are giving up the benefit of saving 10 dollars on the rolling stones ticket. Therefore the opportunity cost of seeing the beatles instead of the rolling stones is 10 dollars.

 No.80

>On any given day, you would be willing to pay up to $50 to see Rolling Stones
>implying you can meaningfully quantify the joy of seeing mick jagger live

This is why no-one takes economists seriously.

 No.85

>>80
Whose implying that? I've never heard of anyone who has said that.



File: 1424410468783.png (15 KB, 237x133, 237:133, flags.png)

 No.68[Reply]

I was gonna do these later in the week, but I decided to go ahead and experiment with /pol/ style flags. I will continue to keep the flags unless I feel they cause threads to become to circlejerky or lower thread quality in some other way. If you wanna suggest a new flag, do so in this thread or in the Meta thread.

Also, thanks to the anon on >>>/boards/ who made pic-related so I wouldn't have to go hunting for flags on google images.
3 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.72

>>71
I would say to go make a flag for Austrians, Neoclassical economics(perhaps use the invisible hand for that one). Since you're here to learn about economics, I'd recommend you look up all this stuff on Google or Wikipedia. I'd also recommend looking through the Monetarism, Keynesian economics, and New Classical macroeconomics Wikipedia pages for some introductions to mainstream economic thought on the Macro scale.

 No.75

File: 1424417115034-0.png (703 B, 16x11, 16:11, hand.png)

File: 1424417115034-1.png (477 B, 16x11, 16:11, mutualism.png)

File: 1424417115034-2.gif (587.8 KB, 300x100, 3:1, banner.gif)

Here, neoclassical, mutualism and a banner.

Hope you like it

 No.78

>>76 for gift economy flag

 No.82

>>75
The banner's file size is too large. It needs to be 500 KB or less

 No.84

File: 1424441992109.gif (439.03 KB, 300x100, 3:1, banner 2.gif)

>>82
Oops sorry didn't knew that.
This should work.



File: 1424415398756.jpg (12.17 KB, 304x240, 19:15, 1396534100001.jpg)

 No.74[Reply]

Do you faggots even economy?

 No.76

File: 1424418159840.png (545 B, 16x11, 16:11, gift.png)

What do you think about that?

 No.77

>>76
Good, good. Now someone make it a flag.

 No.83

This thread will be saged and locked because we already have 2 threads for suggesting flags and banners
http://8ch.net/econ/res/23.html
http://8ch.net/econ/res/68.html

I have added gift economy to the flag list.



File: 1424372869233.jpg (59.67 KB, 498x668, 249:334, 1418861046060.jpg)

 No.55[Reply]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUTLCDBONok

>Modern Monetary Theory vs. Austrian School Debate


Austridork gets his buttslaped


File: 1420350614959.jpg (89.72 KB, 640x523, 640:523, Cooperative-hire-ourselves.jpg)

 No.17[Reply]

What does /econ/ think of Worker Co-ops?

 No.43

The most beautiful thing on the planet.

 No.46

>>17
They usually - if left unhindered or unharrassed from outside - work out very well in improving the economic position and quality of life for those involved.

On a macro scale, if the entire economy was based on worker owned co-operatives we would be living in anarcho-syndicalism or something similar, which would be quite nice I imagine.

 No.51

I work in one.



File: 1423100076699-0.png (22.74 KB, 975x186, 325:62, WRQ5BJi.png)

File: 1423100076699-1.png (45.51 KB, 940x489, 940:489, MBr63e3.png)

 No.28[Reply]

Post stuff about random retards failing to understand the economy.

Pic here is of a Portlander saying the city should put price controls on Uber and taxi services. He also believes that there is a libertarian elite trying to infect the city and his friend says that Portland needs real leftists in their government.

 No.29

File: 1423240736970.gif (1.83 MB, 245x147, 5:3, goofball.gif)

>profiteering

 No.40

>Company with access to large initial investment comes in and provides service below cost to drive out competition
>Competitors/entrepreneurs don't have the resources to compete
>Large company ups prices/reduces quality of service until a new competitor emerges, at which point they repeat the process until the competitor goes out of business
>Cycle continues endlessly

Could you point out exactly what is wrong with this theory? Isn't this already what WalMart does?

 No.48

>>40
Sorry should have explained. The problem is that he is advocating for price controls for cab and town car services without any evidence. He doesn't seem to be aware of regulatory capture.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture
He also claims they should do price controls because uber pays shit wages, but that's not true most of the time.
http://time.com/money/3678389/uber-drivers-wages/

https://s3.amazonaws.com/uber-static/comms/PDF/Uber_Driver-Partners_Hall_Kreuger_2015.pdf

Uber actually pays about the same to higher wages, especially if you account for the fact that uber drivers aren't compensated for driving related expenses. He also goes on about how this all part of the libertarian elite which makes me kek.



[]
[1] [2] [3]
| Catalog
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]