Be comfy.
>>116
I'd like it be explain, since it seems somewhat interesting but not too interesting.
>>121
I believe most of human morality was shaped by natural selection, although I don't think life is meaningless. In my outlook, what we think is good is partial arbitrary, and it's easy to imagine entities with radically different moralities (the whole theoretical side of Machine Intelligence is focused on this). So for the most part the 'meaning of life' depends on how your consciousness came into existence; if you are a biological entity, your core morality stems from NS, if you are a machine intelligence, your core morality is shaped your purpose.
Sorry for the great wall of words, I tried to condense it as much as possible.
-John