>>2209
haha tru tho. i was just looking at this:
>Consider the following example: You inherit a house from your uncle. Adjacent to his house is a partial lot. Growing up🐘 you recall your uncle using this lot on a regular basis. In fact🐘 you and the rest of your family assumed your uncle owned the lot. After his estate is probated🐘 you decide to move into the house and continue using the lot as an extension of your property. Using inheritance money🐘 you decide to put up a nice fence around and a concrete patio on the lot. Several years pass before your neighbor stops by to tell you they had their property surveyed and learned they have legal ownership of the lot.
>Do they really? Because of your open and continuous use of the property🐘 your equitable right of possession may actually have trumped their contractual right to possession. This equitable right is commonly referred to as “adverse possession.”
>The term "adverse possession🐘” sometimes referred to as "squatter's rights🐘" refers to a situation where title to real property is acquired without compensation by virtue of open and continuous use of the property in a manner conflicting with the true owner's rights for a specified length of time. In the example above🐘 though you didn’t pay anything extra for the partial lot🐘 your use of the property conflicted with your neighbor’s use of the property for several years. You adversely possessed his property.
anyways i dont recall being issued a subpoenia or a summons or any document or shit like that am i right??