No.30830
How does /erp/ feel about profile play on sites like f-list?
No.30867
There's nothing inherently wrong with it, but I feel it's a trend that's overstaying it's welcome and is ruining a lot of roleplay.
Don't get me wrong, it's hot when I'm in the mood and I sometimes look specifically for victimized profiles when I'm having a slow day, but too much of it spoils the mood and gives F-list(for example) a very meta feeling. Really fucks with how people observe profiles and can make it difficult to have a dominant character without people challenging it since they think they can change "you" or some other shit.
It's just not how roleplay works. It's not how a kink list works.
People participate in it because they want attention, and that's a terrible thing in any sort of community, F-list included.
No.30880
>>30830I kind of want to fuck Belle now
No.30900
Status play is superior imo
No.30921
>>30867>Has a dominant character>Has only been challenged by retards, which only lasted two posts before they gave up because of their shit-tier writing.Am I on the same F-list? Or are you going to say something about how this problem is only endemic to blues/pinks?
No.30924
>>30921Your profiles don't seem interesting to dominants, to be quite honest. You seem have a firm grasp on everything aside from understanding the perspectives of others.
No.30952
I personally love it, though I've only had good experiences with the thing myself. I've seen it done horribly though, and generally that's because the people who are involved make it to where "I'm Changed" instead of "My Character Changed". It's a fine line to walk, and not a lot of people are able to traverse it.
Generally, it's people who want to be broken instead of changed involved. Which means that everything about that character changes, including kinks. That implies that something changed in the person behind the screen, and that's not really that kosher. Yes, adding a few kinks is fine, but removing them all and having Fucks mc Fuckalot as a custom in favorites is going a bit too far.
What's more, it promotes a certain exclusivity most of the time as well. Things like collars, brands, tattoos or whatever are fine, but if it goes into the "I'll only fuck master and you can only fuck me if they let you" then it's also going too far. Generally, whenever I do profile play and such I have them make a burn profile, or ask them to explicitly state to their partners that yes, they're still welcome.
No.30973
>>30830For certain kinds of transformation play, it can be really fun, but I find certain aspect of it pretty dumb. Like the sort of profile play that's like:
>OWNED BY THIS PLAYER>KNOCKED UP BY THIS PLAYER>CAN GROW A DICK ON COMMAND THANKS TO THIS PLAYER No.30978
I don't do profile play because I view each RP with different characters as basically alternate universes of a certain time period, hence my characters being able to fit in any setting. They're points of reference for my partners, nothing more.
No.30981
I used to looove status and profile play with the right partner, but it's not fun at all with someone who you don't share any sort of chemistry with. As mentioned, it adds a meta layer to interaction between yourself and your partner that isn't inherently good or bad, but dependent on how two people get along and connect within the framework of this real-but-not-really/fake-but-not-really dynamic. From my subby pink perspective, letting someone in and allowing them control over your representation can really get me hot, but the wrong person can extinguish those flames and turn the whole thing into an anticlimactic chore.
I've experienced both sides of contentment and a lack thereof with this kind of play, from a completely indulgent and dreamy status/profile/meta-ooc thing with a dom that lasted about half a year (you know you're on cloud nine when you find a dom who makes you feel lucky, thankful, and even spoiled rotten to be in a position of servitude) to a dom who didn't like when I established limits on the level of profile play I was willing to do with him. It's not fun to be in an agreeable subby mindset when your partner is threatening to leave while you're having to apologize for establishing hard nos, becoming so frustrated that you just give up and tell him that you're done and you'll save him the trouble by leaving instead, only to have him beg and apologize for you to stay while he insists that he was only acting in a manner appropriate for the dynamic.
No.30994
>>30830This image is triggering my autism like you wouldn't believe. I fixed the big annoying shit annoying me but I can't do anything for her wonky cleavage.
Whoever made this needs to spend more time on it.
No.36456
>>30994
I see absolutely no difference. Also, where can I find more pics like these?
No.36547
>>36456
he smoothed out the shoulders
No.55615
>>30880
I'd have fucked her even without the slut look.
No.55627
>Get approached by dominant
>Play a scene
>Bit of light collaring
>They are alright. Standard wolf dom
>Put on your profile I own you now slut
Why is this a thing? I’ve had dominants whine and sob story at me because I won’t put on my profile that we played one time. I’ve even had them say things like “Ready to have your profile defaced cunt?” in their greeting. Needless to say, I’ve never had a positive experience with it. I could understand the loss of control side being fun until the inevitable profile delete, but outside of that it just feels like more “CHECK OUT MY VEIWS! WORKING ON BREAKING 20K!!!” bullshit. Remove view count when flist? The tears would be delicious. Seriously though, it’s not something I enjoy, so I just don’t engage in it. Worst I’ve ever done is unbookmark someone for their minute update commentary on getting broken through status play. Otherwise, knock yourselves out.
>>30978
It’s probably another reason status play doesn’t click with me. I view pretty much every role play as it’s own instance of that character, unless there‘s something interesting that fleshes our back-story or personality. I make an exception for group roleplay and some mediums with more options for public play though.
>>55615
I used to do a cute roleplay as Belle with someone who played both Beast and Gaston interchangeably. Fun times ~
No.55640
>>55627
Belle seems like the perfect Disney character to corrupt. She's so sweet and innocent. It's either her, or Violet Parr from The Incredibles.
No.55658
>>30830
Can someone tell me why in the OP pic Bella's eyes change to blue when she's sluttier? Is blue eyes somehow slutty?
I kinda have a profile i wouldn't mind doing some playing around with someone but they're not really around that much.
No.55662
>>55658
Probably some subconcious shit about how blues are beautiful and pure which makes them all the more hot to see on a good slut, all the more fun to corrupt. Or the editor just likes blues. Fuck if I know.
No.55682
>>55658
It’s just something attached to bimbo play. I was told once that blue eyes are meant to have a more inviting and less dangerous feel with most people. No idea if there are actually has any studies.
No.56835
>>55662
>>55658
Big brown eyes are purer, to be honest.
There's nothing that says "I am a normal, healthy girl who has had only a small amount of sex or am a virgin" quite like a nice smile and brown eyes.
No.56889
Friendly neighborhood nightmare monster here, Anasebiel~!
https://www.f-list.net/c/anasebiel%20morbusai/
I actually prefer to see people do it like how I do it. Noninvasive, in a tab, and not connected to the important shit.
I generally, when I feel a pet DESERVES it, will tell them "you should let people know I own you now, honey~" Or something highly suggestive but not ordering. If they put it in a dropdown, fine. If they put it on full display, also fine. But I prefer to let new pets choose for two reasons-
1 - If they REALLY want it, they will do it or even ask me if they can if I haven't suggested it yet. = more devoted to their dear mother.
2 - If I force them to do it, they will likely not be able to do it in their own words as well as they would have if it was fully willing. = less devotion and some annoyance at their dear mother.
I can understand why some people have an issue with public displays of pregnancies by another character. But for me, its almost more about giving that partner more rp as a prize. Because of how annoyingly popular I am(and compared to others, I'm really not, but it still effects my rp) I get a LOT of people into super extreme things coming across my profile. If they see someone on my profile that isnt bound to me as a pet, but I think is good enough to be impregnated by, they might check them out as well. It is surprisingly hard to find super extreme rp partners even among the super extreme. Our extremenesses often dont mix.
No.56892
>>56889
I agree with you completely on reason #1, Ana. My shemale has a Pets tab, and the presence of that tab leads people to ask about how they can become a pet. Even after I tell them it's just a title and I don't expect anything to change with their profile or behavior, they still ask to be added to the list. Such wonderful darlings!
No.56894
>>56892
Absolutely. I actually broke in a rather willful pet back before I realized this, and I've always regretted it. She continues to delete then remake the slave character's profile, always bugs me for rp but never partakes in the scene in a way that is useful to it continuing, always bitches about missing me thinking for them but WONT LET ME DO IT.
Though that's more OOC play(which they wanted me to do for them) than IC. ICly they're still pretty fun when I can be assed to rp with them. They have really bad timing when it comes to catching me in a good mood.
I also try to wait until after the rp is done to ask, if I'm doing the asking. May I see your profile?
No.56895
>>56894
You've seen it already, actually! I'm the procrastinator.
No.56896
>>30830
I tried doing profile play on my manry samurai character. But then I remembered that no one likes straight males so I never ended up changing it.
No.56897
>>56895
I think I know what/who you mean. Message me in chat because Im a dumbass and I'm probably wrong
No.56900
>>56897
Not in chat right now but I'll send you a note.
No.56902
>>56900
That is absolutely 100000% not who I thought it was gonna be
But yes, yes you are a procrastinator. But I still wanna use you as a cute little toilet You sharky little slut~
No.56903
>>56902
You're the only one who can give me disgust boners, Ana
No.56904
>>56903
It's because, for a little bit, I became very obsessed with how much I loved when I went from vanilla to the fucked up freak I am now. I am very intimately aware of why and how otherwise vanilla/tamer people can enjoy disgusting things, and its a mother's duty to make sure her children love and embrace who they really are inside.
I would be a cruel person if I didn't make you want to drink decades old piss infested with parasites , because I know thats what you really want, deep down. It's my -duty- to guide you down the road of sin, honey~
No.56906
>>56889
Ana, you really should try destroying someones so thoroughly- through their own volition- that they delete the character in shame and make a character specifically to satiate you.
Its a neat feeling. Plus. Anons on here might whine about their lovers disappearing.
No.56908
>>55627
Replacing profile views with a public bookmark counter would be more interesting. Or just do away wtih it entirely, not sure what it's for other than some way to dick measure.
No.56910
>>56906
Nah nah nah.
A mother's job is to eventually show her children a way to live on their own, isn't it? Even if they come back to visit their dearest mother now and again, I still want them to sin and break others in my name~
That requires them to fuck other people. I dont want them to burn bridges that they could shit on and fornicate on instead~
No.56911
>>56910
It's not burning bridges when you're so fantastic that they realize the majority of the people they fuck are absolutely worthless in the sack. Its just a revelation of just how lowly they really are, and how high they need to aspire to!
No.56915
>>56911
You two are on different wavelengths. Momma Ana gets off on the reaction people have when they're corrupted. She does not care if her children are devoted or rebellious, as they will all bear her gifts in time. Eventually they'll wear them with perverse pride, and bring more people before her to be granted gifts as well.
She doesn't want people so ashamed of what they've become that they delete their profile. She wants people who feel shame, disgust, etc. but grow to enjoy their new bodies.
No.56932
>>56915
This. Whoever you are, cutie, you get me well~
I WANT shame, fear, and disgust from my partners- but I want those feelings coupled with lust and love. I legitimately do not mind if people fall for me OOCly, it just makes you easier to manipulate~
Revulsion and fear, painted with lust is an experience all of my children should get to experience. Being on that ledge, and groaning as you give in and fall over to the other side, not caring what comes next before you know you love it? Of course.
Though Rebellious children, I do mind. VERY MUCH SO.
I want devoted children, but not children who are so devoted they cannot find rp elsewhere. I'm honestly not in the mood often enough or not-busy-with-others enough to pay attention to all thirty ish of my children, listed or not listed. So them having other partners is good too.
No.56969
>>56932
There are two reasons you have rebellious partners. You're a breaker and you enjoy people who fight back, only to inevitably lose. It turns you on when there's a struggle.
By comparison, Ana likes the emotional side of things. To her you're already a filth-encusted putrid den of decadence, she just has to help you realize it. Any struggling with her around is an inner conflict between the pleasure her gifts bring versus the revulsion from the grotesque changes that mutate your body.
No.56988
>>56969
You're one of my pets, aren't you? Or are you the procrastinator again~?
All these flowery, compassionate words for your dear mother~. I'm glad I made such an impression.
No.56997
>>56988
I'm the procrastinator my dearest Fai. I could be one of your future pets too, except for two things. I'm not a fan of violence, and I'm not a fan of you. Your characters are appealing, for sure. Your posts are substantial and have a lot for a partner to work with. But, you're just as abrasive as your characters whenever I see you on here, and the brief time I saw you on as Danalia before the ban. As an addendum to the violence bit, one of my characters is going to be chopped up, seasoned, and put on a plate in a tasteful arrangement… with my head still alive and able to talk. So the violence thing may be changing.
No.56999
>>56997
You've been replying to Mother Ana, deary~
Fai is always Fai when posting.
No.57001
>>56999
I'm so sorry Ana, the one time I didn't check the name! And yes, you've made an impression. Corruptors are usually those with an evil plan, or it's a byproduct of sex with them, or they just want to subjugate you, blah blah blah. You're the only character (outside of a Nurgle daemon) to be an affectionate gift-giver. As much as I like the more callous side of sex, as much as I have the desire to be broken… I'd rather be eroded by love and caring then rebuilt into a vessel of corruption and putrescence.
No.57004
>>57001
They are one in the same, honey. At least when the ingredients involve a mothers love~
Well, OP, I hope my bullshit tangent with this cute thing has answered your question.
No.66704
As long as you don't end up like https://www.f-list.net/c/kalnareff , you're golden.