/erp/ - Erotic Roleplay

Scat.

People who feel the need to have a TOS/Giant set of 'rules for how to approach me'.

People that have 'passwords' hidden in their profile, that you have to seek out and find.

I'm often wary of people who have giant bitchy customs about how they don't play with males (or any gender, for that matter), even when I'm not on a character of the gender being bitched about, and would otherwise find them appealing. I don't mind if people don't find a certain gender appealing, it's when they feel the need to be ridiculously aggressive about it that it gets annoying.

Custom no for 'drama'. 99% of the people who have that are massive sources of the stuff, and I want none of that.

The pictures linked here: >>52615

'Put this in your profile if you are or support furries'

Useless, near-empty kink lists, or just a few customs containing random stuff like talking about how their character enjoys grapefruit or whatever. I know there's some sense of avoiding people using the chat kink search feature, but you could also just set your profile to not public to dodge that - the site is literally 'fetish list', it's for listing your fetishes to find people you're compatible with. Every time I've tried to play with someone with a blank kink list, it turns into a game of 20 (thousand) questions of trying to work out what we can actually do.

Ridiculous set of mosaics/inlines/colour/etc with barely any actual text content to the profile. Style over substance in a profile can look nice, but it ultimately tells you nothing. It gives no feel for a person's writing style or anything - and their ability to photoshop an inline image tends to have very little to do with how good they are at roleplaying.

...I... kind of have a lot of things that immediately put me off.

Extensively detailed list of their equipment, especially weapons and armor.

RPG stats. Why the fuck?

Small letters. Fuck everything about this. I won't read any fucking profile that needs me to zoom in. You probably jack off to the Tohou girls.

Blatant and numerous misspellings. You wrote this profile in a browser. Any and every browser worth its salt made and/or kept updated in 2015 has a built-in spellchecker. You have no excuse.

The more vitriolic the contents of your No list, the less likely I'll be to give you the time of day. Not being turned on by MLPs is fine. Using your custom kink as a soapbox to declare MLP fetishists of having a mental problem instantly makes you *that* guy.

Any sort of view/bookmark milestone count. Grow up.

Public friends list, or list of family members, most cherished contacts, etc. This pretty much means you're an attention whore. Excluding profile play of course.

Maybe it's just because I'm shallow or something, but even if somebody was like, one of the best writers ever, if their profile images and icon turn me off, I just seriously can't bring myself to play with them. Dunno why I can't ignore it, but I can't.

>Real Life Images

>Species: Wolf

>Bi - Female Preference

>Scat as a fave, immediately with the "YOU DON'T HAVE TO GO FOR IT, BUT I'D LOVE IT IF YOU SHAT ON ME / LET ME POO ON YOU" custom nearby.

>Massive 500,000 user friend list, and a massive 100,000 user "wall of sluts" on the profile.

The biggest one is if said elitist douche approaches me for play, then just poofs and ignores me and my notes when I ask if I did anything wrong, followed by watching the social dharmapala openly gabbing it up in chat, and if I call him/her out to try and get her attention either publicly or in notes, some of their more regular ball-suckers threaten to get me banned for being a disturbance. Fucking hate most of F-List.

>/endrant

>>52833

>People that have 'passwords' hidden in their profile, that you have to seek out and find.

Haven't seen this shit since the dark ages of Chatango.

People do that nonsense on F-List?

>People with huge number of views, generally female, who Will offer roleplay to you if you donate to their paypal and/or give them shit in a relevant game you both play, if applicable.

Fuck Sparkshine.

Diaper play. I haven't met a single person into this that isn't autistic, doesn't have mommy/daddy issues, or isn't a clingy, possessive fuck.

No Drama

Because they always have the most drama

Everything else is fine though.

>any kind of emote

>"cutesy" intros (eg "meow?" or "rolls over")

>Kink list has ONLY custom kinks

>>52850

>I haven't met a single person into this that isn't

Maybe that's because you arbitrarily decide they're like that without giving them a chance?

>>52820

Custom no about ignores.

Other bitchy customs are too, but ignores is first and foremost.

>>52847

Yep.

There's a legendary TEN PASSWORDS profile, but I don't remember the name.

It's probably because I'm lazy but I get uninterested quick if the profile has three pages of background story and alternate setting description but no clear indicator of what the "theme" of the profile is about.

I've seen a profile go on for a whole novel and only at the end could you distinguish he's supposed to be a Halo ODST soldier on leave and only interested in military RP.

>>52850

>tfw everyone i met who's into diaper play is pretty much focused on it, wants pooping and cleaning in great detail and talks about nothing but diaperstuff OOC.

Finding people who treat it as humiliation tool instead of a lifestyle is hard.

>"hehe"

>>52974

>Literally had to chew someone out because his sentences would end with "heh" or "hehe" instead of periods.

Triggered.

>>52919

Or maybe because I've had at least like 50 of them that have it in their yes' or as a custom and even while half of them didn't bring it up at first,they suddenly shoehorn it in after 3 or 4 scenes as well as creepy OOC shit when they feel "comfortable" with me. Like they always want to call me Daddy OOC. Shit's fucking gay man fuck you.

>>52967

I dont mind it as a humiliation tool, though I think there are better ways to do that. If that's ALL it stays as, yeah, I'm down. But damnit man they always try to push it more. Every time.

>>53036

Sounds like you've been playing with babyfurs. Stay away from furfags and lowercase name shitters, and people into it are alright for the most part.

"I do everything ! Every kink open !"

>btw bestiality is disgusting.

Also, people who just have "no gross stuff" as their no's. MOST OF SEX CAN BE DESCRIBED AS GROSS

>listing your orientation as any variation of bisexual or pansexual

>putting a gender in 'no,' usually male!

>putting your orientation as Straight/Gay as a Shemale or Hermaphrodite

>expecting that to mean anything for a sex that is all genders at fucking once

>Not understanding that Bi - Female Preference is literally the only way to put down a blatantly stated preference as a Hermaphrodite or Shemale.

Like, I get if I was a straight up female going 'Bi - Female Preference LOLOL NO MEN THOUGH', but the whiners about Gay Shemales or whatever the fuck make just as little sense. Its more chalked up to personal 'I'm going to choose the one that specifically states what I like' or 'I'm going to leave it vague because -nothing fucking fits-'

>>53085

>>53087

That's a flaw on F-List's part, not the part of the players. They could choose to have just the kinks detailing the genders, but they did that PLUS an orientation option that has very poor wording.

>>53036

>Daddy talk in OOC

That flag can't get any more red. I mean yes, diaper play always has a bit of "ageplay" in it because they're treated like a baby and don't use the toilet. But come on, you're pissing yourself, that should be embarassing and not something to be proud of.

>>53075

>having disgusting exchange of bodily fluids

>not enjoying pure and chaste cuddling

>>53087

>>53089

I always ignore that and look for a "gender preference" custom kink. Shit can't be fixed and you're better off just listing what type of "gender" you wanna RP with.

>>52874

>*Actions* "intros"

>"XD" in lieu of anything else.

Some of the better players I know do that as a tolerance test, and have said that explicitly. Lesser willed individuals flip out and miss out on major league carnal activity.

That said, those approaches automatically load the skepticism shotgun with a few shells, however. If they bury me in a pile of ":3" or "XD", I just bow out.

>>53036

>Daddy play

I'm breaking the rule with one character I really wanna fug, but damn do I not like daddy play. Had to make sure to put it in my no.

And the one thing that will make me instantly lose interest is not a profile thing but rather a behaviorial - any measure of passive aggressiveness because I am not in the mood to play or trying to make me feel guilty or bad for not wanting to play. Shit will make me as sour as a sourpussycat made out of lemons.

Got one clingy fucking faggot doing that to me right now and I need to work up the balls to say I am not interested anymore.

>>53177

I've half decided that people who enjoy Daddyshit are sociopaths to some degree, right up there with NTR/cucks.

>>53232

I don't understand why a girl cheating on her boyfriend or husband or a guy cheating on his wife or girlfriend is so taboo for people. Is it too real? I only like being the bull, and I don't understand being the cuck, but you don't have to make all cuckolding scenarios about cheating ON one of the characters WITH another.

>>53275

If I were to pontificate on it I'd guess some people are more conscious or worried about being cheated on (perhaps having been already or just deathly afraid of it to begin with), so they identify with the cuckolded. I'm with you on the bull element - yeah it's a clear and unabashed power fantasy. So what? That's what most ERP is (even in a perverse way when it's some powerful dame knight being laid low by a savage beast or whatever). Feel like milla vanilla average mcaveragson getting a jaw dropping amazing beautiful vixen for a lover is even more blatant and absurd of a power fantasy.

"This character is played by a male behind the keyboard." positioned somewhere very obviously on the profile of a non-male character.

…Why? I don't even care about the gender of the person playing the character, but it seems very strange to me that some people feel that they have to mention it, and they draw a lot of attention to it by making it big, bold, and red like they feel it's important.

>>52822

Yeah, probably this.

>>53285

Honestly, it's more likely a deterrent to keep away people who do get into that sort of thing rather than an attempt at attention whoring

>>53285

Well, yes. Most people won't care about that, but it might be for those "wanna be my girlfriend?" type of people.

Still leagues better than people who IM you and go

>"Hey, are you a girl IRL?"

>"I'm not gay, i only RP with real girls."

>>53285

Honestly? I've been tempted to add it somewhere in my profile, and I'm a girl irl. The times I've felt like doing so are very specific, though. It's when someone contacts me, and while checking out their profile, I find notes of these type all over it:

>IRL males: If you're a male behind the keyboard, I don't want to play with you. I don't care if you have a jawdropping female/sherm/etc, I just flat out can't get turned on if you're a guy.

>If you're a guy irl, NEVER EVER EVER MENTION IT TO ME, or I'm going to block and ignore you on the spot.

>I can't get off on a roleplay unless I know the player behind the character is getting moist from my fabulous typefucking, so if you're not a girl, don't bother contacting me.

>PLAY YOUR GENDER. Only males know what it's like to orgasm as a male, and only females can describe the lady delights. I will NOT play with deluded players who want to pretend to be something they're not. :3

As far as I'm concerned, your gender irl doesn't matter one bit when it comes to roleplay. But seeing people so hung up about it that they need to broadcast how they can't get hard unless they know they're making someone moist, or how it's sooooo awkward to play with a guy (even if the character is a female and player gender never came up in chat), is really annoying. If they make a big deal out of it, I reject them, and if they ask why, I tell them I'm a guy.

Emoticons. For some reason, seeing >_< or :D or *anything* like them just instantly turns me off. You might have a great idea, but if you do that, I'll be left cold. But I don't want to mention it on my profiles, because being mad publicly about something so small is the height of autism too.

>>53397

Honestly, you should put it in your profile. Let people know so the considerate ones can at least have a chance.

"Hi how are you?"

Yep, I'm officially "that" guy, and those four fucking words just make my eyes roll. The best I can hope for after the obligatory "I'm fine thanks. You?" "I'm fine too." is " is for them to pitch an RP idea. What usually happens is complete fucking silence after that point.

The worst part is that I feel like a dick for disliking it so much. It's a completely normal and benign thing to say to a stranger, and yet it's an early warning system that I'm going have my time wasted.

>>53419

I agree. I'm also not fond of partners that want to talk a lot OOC and ask me things about myself. I'm here for RP, not to talk about video games or books or whatever.

>>53419

There are dozens of us who share that view, DOZENS. I wouldn't say it's dickish to dislike it, nor is it the same as actual small talk. The exchange of "hey" "hey" "how are you" happens in 5 seconds or less in real life - online because these dim wits wait for you to respond and stagger the introduction it ends up being a lot longer. Coupled with not waiting around on their window you have to respond to them - go back to your channel or RP or other tab, then wait for them to go "how are you".

The best way for them to do it is "Hey, how are you doing? If I haven't caught you at a bad time I'd like to pitch this RP idea/I really liked your profile and XYZ kinks and think this concept would work".

>>53424

I hear ya.

>>53419

I agree wholeheartedly with this. I've even explicitly pointed these out on my profiles that this is the *worst* way to get my attention, and I still get people who just say hi.

>>53406

What's funny is that while I tell people not to do the "hey, how are you?" routine on me, I still feel that calling that out *and* emoticons is just too much. Like I'm allowed to explicitly call out one habit I hate, but not the other, because being clear with what I want and don't want means I take it too seriously.

>"Hi, how are you?" / "Hey" / "Minimal greeting goes here".

Okay. I won't expect much since RP isn't anything I tend to get on the regular on F-List.

>"Hi! ^^;"

Fuck that. I've gotten ignored by ~30 "murr hello canines" that approached with that fucking shingle-emote attached.

Can't be dealin' with it. The two times I did they ended up in-character and it totally killed the mood. Never again!

>>53310

>PLAY YOUR RL GENDER ONLY

>Suddenly, the purple/pink "matriarchy" suddenly turns azure at the drop of a hat.

Monkey's Paw wish, motherfucker. I don't think he wants that, in the finality of it all.

>That ":3" attached.

His opinion is invalidated…regardless.

>>53285

I've seen that on a few profiles. The players are decent too.

>>53500

What is that page from?

Succubus.

Nah. Just nah.

>>53525

It's from google image search.

>>53547

Overweight people are really disgusting imo

>>53419

It's a rhetorical pleasantry and i usually ignore it. If they stay silent after the "how are you" part, i handle it like someone clicked the wrong name or like they never messaged me in the first place. The few seconds aren't worth the grudge.

>>53500

Same. I rarely use uppercase and sometimes leave punctuation at the end out when chatting OOC because I'm so used to IRC still. I also use emoticons OOC

>>53549

>implying because a person is fat they're unsanitary

>>53549

They can be, but not necesarily. Your taste's pretty disgusting tbh.

>>53397

As a person that posts emoticons pretty much every single sentence, you should add that to your profile somewhere. If I know that the other person is annoyed, I try my best to keep myself from doing it.

https://www.f-list.net/c/Sapphire%20Takaishi

I'm sorry, everyone.

New to f-list and I found this, fuck humanity.

https://www.f-list.net/c/hoagy%20butterworth/

>>53603

Eh. Yeah the sheer number of collapses is a bit much. But I'm not seeing the-

>>Shi/Hir

Oh god. My autism is acting up again!

https://www.f-list.net/c/anasebiel%20morbusai/

You faggots should tell me(kinks aside of course. I know I'm extreme but I cant help what I like) how to improve my profile. I'm pretty sure I have a good one laid out, but I wanna know if any of it is offputting like the stuff in this thread

>>53668

I'm not a profile 'snob'/connoisseur, but I'd say put about half or 3/4th of the text beneath the inline image in a dropdown. You could easily put everything below "What is there to corrupt if all dwell…" in a drop-down, or beneath the other drop-downs. It would solve the dead space of a large paragraph spacing between the sexual fluids and 'taken the cum of icon".

Some people might not like the emotionalness in your custom kinks (I mean the candid way the description is written) but I don't mind them and I doubt anyone interested in your extreme kinks would either.

But dealing with that 'long' scrolldown to your kinks is the only thing I'd change. Shove the sexual fluids and yearly pregnancy lines into a drop-down and it'd be solved.

>>53672

I'd do that, but I really dislike excessive dropdowns and I think I have too many of them already. I do agree though that that may be a bit of an issue.

I'll start thinking of a way to slim it down, then. I think that should have the same effect.

>"hey ;)"

>>53792

Friendly shitposting is a sign of a strong relationship.

>>52820

>"don't talk to me about my gramar"

>master, lover, or anything in between in a big shrine section

>lithe girls doing strong man things with a dark setting or some shit

>scat

>any person who is transgendered in their profile, but is listed solely as a female or male

>any person who is trans, but it's just a guy with boobs now or a girl with a dick

>"Gay" on anything that isn't male or female, which actually means will fuck anything with a pair of tits

>"will fuck anything with a pair of tits" profiles that feed into the circle jerk of making sure guys are shunned until they make a herm profile

and just as a weird tick

>seeing that the writer plays both male and female characters or the writer listing plainly that they are in fact a dude

I don't get why you want me to know that going in; I want to think about fucking a cute girl, and all I'll think about is how disgusting I am and multiply that by fat.

>>52820

"I have a strong moral stance against X"

X doesn't even have to be anything I'd like, it just shows how fucking bigoted the player is, and I would never want to deal with or support those kinds of people if I had the choice.

>post ad

>get approached

>"If you had a picture, I might be inclined to play"

>There's a ten-line long description on my profile

>>54144

They're here to read and jack off. I'm always in a panic whenever someone initiates conversation and I have to try to read everything on the profile without seeming AFK or just ignoring them.

>>54165

The answer to your second problem is to tell them you're reading over their profile you dingus.

That fucking ascii paw shit that says 'Put this on your profile if you support furries'. Like, the fuck is this shit? You're on f-chat, a good chunk of the userbase are fucking furries.

>>54206

it's really helpful

it's like the aspies actually writing that they have aspergers under their ooc dropdown

>>54206

You do know if you don't have that paw on your profile your literally fursecuting the whole community?!

In fairness I haven't heard a furry talk like that in a very long time.

>>54221

CHECK YOUR FUCKING PAWVILEGE

>>54206

>>54206

Example please?

>>54227

https://www.f-list.net/c/derek%20ray/

Also, add in 'put this in your profile if you' on https://www.f-list.net/search.php if you want more examples.

>>54233

That doesn't even look like a paw… Maybe it's just me?

>>54265

Maybe it's my browser? Can you post a screenshot of yours?

>"I bet you don't even like me anymore v.v "

>"You never play with me! ;___; !!! "

People with a fucktonne of alts in their sidebars, or altaholics in general. I mean, I can understand having a couple of characters, but when you get above ten or fifteen? Fuck that, I'm out.

>>54280

They're either really bad "shapeshifting personas", or really good roleplayers capable of playing various personalities. The latter is usually rare, as always.

>>54276

Yup, that's what I see. It looks like absolute shit…

>>54296

What?

Why?

I could understand not wanting to RP with some moe-bait Japanese school girl character. But why would the name alone scare you off?

>>54297

> But why would the name alone scare you off?

Because they're always either some moe-bait Japanese school girl character or some edgy self insert sniper elite mercenary who graduated first in the secret assassin academy

It's only acceptable if the character is actually Japanese

>>54298

>It's only acceptable if the character is actually Japanese

Wait wait, I'm a bit confused, actually. Do people give their characters Japanese names when they aren't Japanese in nationality? Or are you just saying that those cliche moe girls and ow the edge characters are so bland and cardboard-y, that they don't even count as Japanese?

>>54299

>Do people give their characters Japanese names when they aren't Japanese in nationality?

That's like 90% percent of fucking anime characters on F-List

>>54301

That's a whole bunch of anime characters, though

Maziku whatchachamu all over the place, really.

>>54302

>That's a whole bunch of anime characters, though

What…?

>>53397

>But I don't want to mention it on my profiles

Why would you do this? I usually hold back from using any kind of emotes until the other person does it themselves or I ask if it's something they don't mind. But If I let one slip and that's the difference between playing and not playing with someone? That's pretty silly. >>53406 is right on the money.

>Friendly shitposting

My new favorite term.

SM and abuse of all kinds. I'm too much of a softie, I guess. Worse yet is that there are people out there who literally cannot understand that I'm not interested in kicking and insulting them.

>>54301

I've never seen this either, no idea what he's talking about.

People that use the human Fluttershy by Doxy as a picref. You know the one.

It takes a damn good profile to get me to play with someone using that.

>“It‘s not my fault if I DC”

I don't get how so many people have a problem with this. Perhaps not in this thread specifically, but around the community and F-list in general.

Technical issues happen, sometimes frequently, and damned if the cable companies ever fix their shit in a timely fashion. One of my rapidly growing Nopes is people that get super pissy about people that disconnect. Way I see it, if you can't shrug off shit like that, you're an insecure twat who automatically assumes anyone that DCs MUST be logging out to avoid you specifically.

Shit happens. If someone says they're having technical issues, leave it at that. If you're blueballed from a partner dropping out, imagine how bad they feel about it.

Sometimes it rains when you wanna play soccer.

I don't know where to start, this whole profile is one red flag after another:

https://www.f-list.net/c/Hibiko%20Hikari/

>>54456

Ah right, I knew I was forgetting about something.

Profiles with nothing in their No column can fuck right off, especially if their Fave and Yes columns are vanilla as fuck.

I swear, next time I get hit up by someone with an empty No column, I'm gonna try and push the Usual Suspects on them with zero prior discussion.

>>54456

I would like inline to go.

>>54460

Better than the fucking collages at least.

>>54456

But it's empty…

>>54462

That's because everyone knows about the Ultimate Neko/Kitsune Hybrid!

>>54460

If it isn't inline images, it's those fucking mosaics.

F-list staff said they would start clearing out mosaics, but there are so many of them still around and I get bitched at for filing false reports on them.

>>54464

>reporting profiles the staff promised to clear out

>get bitched at for filing false reports

>>54461

>>54464

Mosaics are the cancer of f-list profiles, yes. Glad to see the staff plan on deleting them. Eventually.

>>54463

I… I mean… I guess I can google it…

But really now, the profile IS empty right? There's not some kind of magical ink there which can only be seen if you're taking it up the ass under a full moon right?

>>54468

It only works if you're a nicely, curvy female.

>>54471

And if in addition to that I'm being anally fucked under a full moon? You're a pervert anon.

>>54476

Wanna explain, anon?

>>54477

actively seeking out and spreading STDs

this is a real thing

>>54478

Ohh, yeah I know about that.

Mostly because I also find it kinda hot. It aint on my kinks list though, and I only bring it up when my partner has it up in theirs. Why the hate, anon?

>>54479

Because not all of us are cultists of Nurgle

>>54481

Oh please, don't exterminatus me you big bad shoulder man~

>>54489

The real question here is why you're equating this fictional series of events to real life at all.

>>54489

>In an ERP site where things like torture and abuse are pretty common

Good logics.

>>54492

>>54494

>not playing with all real life consequences to consider

git fucking gud

>>54503

>ERPing on hardcore difficulty

I could get down with this.

>>54503

>implying I don't

The crippling bond of diseases and proof of their lack of standards gets me off you faggot.

>>54505

>>54503

literally mailing a jar of your diseased semen to anyone who roleplays with you

https://www.f-list.net/c/youll_love_my_cock/

This dude messaged a bunch of my gay females last night. :^)

https://www.f-list.net/c/Miama/

This spergatron RPs in all-caps using asterisks. Also tried stealing my Runescape account last Wednesday with the intent to sell it for more terrible, dick-limpening art of her self-insert.

Wouldn't recommend.

>>54538

I'm kinda new to all this, and I don't get why people use that small font…

What am I missing here?

>>54538

>Cute Frankenstein like things are so my jam it’s unreal

>Helping to feed some of my favourite artists

>Pisses off wow nerds that still think the game is warcraft canon anymore

>chubby

I see no problem here.

>>53386

I know your pain, some of dem customs man.

>>54541

Heyhey, you're that gal' that got that rad Sparrow commission! Cool!

>>54538

>>54541

is this some meta attention whoring where zombie buttslut girl tries to garner our sympathy by posting fake insults to herself

10/10 character design by the way, that front tooth gap is hot as fug

>>54539

Because they want to be special snowflakes and hate people with large screens.

>>54891

I wouldn’t nope off someone for having friends on public, but I understand why some people don’t like it. I used to have crazies that would pester my friends trying to find out if they had my contact details or RL information. That and some people intentionally look for profiles on the 10kveiw+ mark to get more exposure on their friend list. Dat f-list popularity game.

>>54895

Most people I know with a mountain of commissioned pictures for their characters especially warcraft related ones tend to not actually play very often if at all. No idea for Miama.

>>54858

I have a small screen. Like, notebook-size screen. Fuck off with your tiny fonts, they don't look good anywhere.

Prostate pop. It doesn't even apply to my characters, since they're female, it's just - ugh. I don't trust anyone that gets off on rupturing your internal organs.

>>52848

Is that not against the rules of the site?

And don't bother, Sparkshine is not a good enough roleplayer to warrant that kind of disgusting behavior.

>>53052

I always have the sneaking suspicion that people who list their "slaves" or shit like you posted are just putting their alts in to try and make themselves look more desirable.

>>53419

It's not the words themselves, per say. It's the fact that people can't seem to convey what they want beyond the typical exchange. Though to be fair, you can easily pose "were you interested in roleplaying?" rather than sit in silence together.

People who type in a way that makes what they're saying just… 'sound' dull, I guess. Like, they're grammatically competent and shit? But the way they type is just… it's dull. It's not alive, doesn't grab you at all.

I don't even know how to put my finger on it, it's not even that I cant do it. It's just completely mystifying to me how someone who can obviously types well manages to type in a way that just comes off as uninspired and uninteresting.

>>57397

People who don't have a voice with their text-fucking, fucking suck. It's almost immediately apparent, and I've passed a lot of 'good' writers, because the stuff they churned out was a bore to read.

>>54277

Someone was doing this to me so I started paying more attention to them and now they barely speak. Fucking cunts.

>>53559

Damn dude, this is some hot stuff. Chubby elves and catgirls sound so hot right now. Maybe you can rub a catgirl's belly and call her a "chubby wittle kitty cat" while feeding her something?

>tfw no catgirl gf

>>57444

Nice trips

Also most males are boring and uninspired, unappealing characters

Most males I meet are garbage writers who have this

>>57397

Problem

>>57447

"Gay" shemale please go

>>57447

I'm convinced that the "NO MALES" females and shemales are those exact same insipid male characters who've realized they can get roleplays with less effort by just making dickgirls.

>>57444

>Someone isn't sexually attracted to Men, or at the bare minimum - aren't the most 'arousing' form they can think of, a la shemales/dickgirls/feminine creatures.

>Man, those niggers are petty.

Fucking retards, everywhere.

>>57463

Unless you have something that really needs to be said in a custom (i.e. "femboys are fine, but otherwise no males"), you can just put the "Males" kink in No. Nobody wants to hear about how males kill your ladyboner, or how they killed your parents.

>>57466

Except that's been shown to not work (in my personal experience) and having it in a custom -drastically- puts a hamper on all the faggots who want a throbbing cock up their ass sauntering up to you.

>>57470

It's different for everybody, bud. I get people approaching me for stuff I have as custom Nos all the time.

>>57472

>drastically puts a hamper

>implying that means 100% stop

Nigga what.

>The entire Profile is an Inline Image

>>57472

In my experience Fai's right. People don't give a shit about the regular kinks, they pay attention to big green fat ones.

>>57470

> and having it in a custom -drastically-

Funny, I have dickgirls as a custom in no and you smegma coated shit sniffers still insist on bugging me.

>>57492

See

>>57475

>Not understanding fucking language and how it works

>Has a hobby focused upon using said language

Jesus fuck.

>>57475

>>57501

Alright wise guy. Regardless of whether I have something listed in a custom, I still get roughly the same amount of people trying to approach me for that thing.

Are you just so eager to talk shit to people that you automatically assumed that the two of us who replied to you were gibbering idiots?

>>57504

I'm sorry your experience is shit and differs from mine - because I didn't point out 'in my personal experience' or anything? My approaches with males drops dramatically with a custom. And I -assume- that with a view rate of 30k~ and 15k~ on my other two alts, in fucking five months, I have had more foot traffic than most people's accounts on here, going off the profile thread.

And yes, I do. This is /erp/, where I get told RP is writing. Fuck yeah I'm going to be a condescending cunt because you yourself can't seem to understand that "In my personal experience" dictates that - yes, golly gee. -Individually shit might be different- and that I was speaking from -personal experience-. Fucking hell. English. Comprehend it, you fucking inept mongoloids.

>>57504

http://www.amerika.org/social-reality/why-idiots-think-they-are-morally-superior-and-smarter-to-you/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_superiority

Here are some namefag basics. It takes two to ruin a board and you're one of them right now.

>>57509

Holy fucking shit you actually linked the Dunning-Kruger affect when I don't even classify my lewds as -writing- and think that is a disservice to actual writers.

Lemme just fucking pat you on the head over here buddy. That's fucking adorable as fuck.

Was I not supposed to use vague statistics given from my profile, or was that a little too retarded for you because 'they aren't concretez'?

>>57508

Oh lord. He actually used "muh view count" as an argument.

>>57511

>muh vague statistics

>muh responses to muh profile

>muh vague sample size

Yeah. Problem?

>>57512

All a view count tells me is that you spend way too much of your time on F-List. Fuck sake, you defend yourself as a namefag on a board with less than 5 active posters.

>>57515

The whole self-depreciating angle you take with your comments is beyond pathetic.

>looks guys, i hate myself, so it's okay that i shitpost and add nothing to the community!

Get a new shtick, it's beyond stale.

>>57516

>stale

And yet you're still replying

>>57517

See how easy it is to drop the name, Fai?

On the subject of ignorance of customs:

I've made a lot of changes to one of my characters recently, essentially only keeping the name and some of the personality. In with all of the changes was a custom No for OOC approaches. I added it for a few reasons, but that's not really relevant.

What is relevant is the ignorance of new RP partners. All of the males who have approached me were either A) OOC or B) ignored another massively important aspect of my character. Over a dozen approaches total and only one was nice enough to jump through the IC hoop I set up. When I mentioned the OOC thing to any of the others, their response was something like "lol sorry didn't see it".

As for Fai's thing, pretty sure you just had a profile that scared straight males away. You could always make a female and see what everyone else is talking about.

>>57524

There is a big stigma on IC approaches in general on F-list. So you're fighting an uphill battle.

>>57519

>dropped a name

>Went to take a nap

>>57524

>make a female

I have. There wasn't any difference.

>>57390

It is against the rules, but if you only discuss it in private and nobody reports you then it's not like the mods can do anything about it without evidence.

>>57550

So long as you're actually a good artist, I don't see a problem. Way too many profiles mention they do commissions when the art is dogshit.

I guess for me some big turn offs are actually the opposite are what I see around a lot of the time. At least on F-list. But I've been Roleplaying for over a decade, and in many different groups and styles. A lot of stuff that people get ticked off about baffles my mind, and somehow I feel most of it is lynch mob-type flavor of the week pissiness.

>I find it annoying if people don't like a certain kind of profile picture style.

I use both, and roleplay with both - and even if I wouldn't use a character with those pictures with them, it lets me know that they have some strange hang up ahead of time about:

>not being turned on by real people. wtf, m8

>>53310

I also hate when guys say "male players IRL" on their profiles, and I'm also a chick. I think it's that double standard thing. I came from roleplaying off of a place seriously lacking males, and picked it up to accommodate my partners - plus I enjoy it more than females because of the weird amount of attention garnered from pink. But seeing that guys get heckled for it makes me mad. No dude has ever told me to buzz off becuase i'm female and getting my yaoi on.

> Guys freaking out about the orientation shit on F-list.

They're referring to their genders and not their sex, holy hell it's 2015 and you're dealing with the worse gendered politically correct masterrace shi/hirs. Plus, boo hoo, not every herm or shemale wants a dude cock. Like, no one is forcing you to play with a character you dislike, why should they be have to?

And I fucking hate tobi wolf

>>58047

>not being turned on by real people. wtf, m8

What's wrong with that? Real people's bodies don't arouse me. Personalities can, and situations they're in can, but 3D meat is bleh.

>People who act like their some big f-list sueprstar

>People who don't have avatars

>People who demand me put their face in my profile because you fucked my character

Getttttt fucked

I got reported by Sparkshine because I asked if how much she charges in paypal for erp

fug

>>58129

Why would you ask? Don't tell me you are seriously considering paying someone for RP

>>58131

No I wanted to get them banned

>>58119

I'm… absolutely floored at how ridiculous that sounds. What happens in real life, out there in the real world? We can all hide behind our fantasies, but unless you plan on having a robot anime girlfriend, I personally find saying that a bit unhealthy.

And I know what you're meaning insofar that particular photograph don't swoop your doobler as much as fictional manga ladies - but making a point to not play with someone for true to life pictures is, to me, pretty out of touch to the real world and kind of unfair becuase you're judging a character based on pic alone.

I wouldn't be so offput about it, except for the fact that it seems like every time someone with that specific No in their No list comes along, they always end up being a weeb NEET creepo with a tendency for clinginess or profile stakling and some real social issues that come with as much extra baggage as Madonna at the airport.

>>58160

Not that anon, but I myself don't like to RP with people who use real images because 99.9% of the time they're simply not attractive. My taste in actual partners in the meatspace is very specific, and that carries over into smuttery when real images are used.

Besides, nothing is a bigger turn-off than someone using some generic ass underwear model dude in their profile assuming "Yes, this is what bitches want" any more than some faggot using that god damned Naked Anime Guy With Towel™ or Downsy Anime Boy With CD Player™

People who go out of their way to let me know they've found out which profiles are mine even if kinks are a bit different and they aren't on a list.

>>58160

>I'm… absolutely floored at how ridiculous that sounds. What happens in real life, out there in the real world? We can all hide behind our fantasies, but unless you plan on having a robot anime girlfriend, I personally find saying that a bit unhealthy.

Probably is, but it's the truth. I find hot what I find hot, I don't find hot what I don't find hot. I do have a girlfriend who I love very much and who can arouse me very well because of the kind of person she is and how well she knows me, but if it were anyone else wearing her skin so to speak her body alone wouldn't do anything for me. Even if I didn't have a girlfriend though, so what? Relationships are nice, but they're not at all necessary for happiness or even sexual fulfillment.

As for the picture point, I can't say, since I don't use F-List, but it seems to me the point of the picture in the first place is to catch someone's eye? A negative first impression is never going to be very helpful, and with the sheer number of F-List profiles I've seen on this board alone, I can't imagine you'd ever have the time to give each and every one a thorough shake.

>>58160

People using real images have yanked the first thing of a de-safesearch'd google that vaguely applys to what they want. When I'm looking for a WorstGender I want a look at the cock, the meat. Not your random softcore gallery.

Call it autism but yeah, I write off real image profiles as hacks. Second only to those one-note anime ones with a couple absolute rando images

On the topic of real life photos, I think it depends on the whole context. They're not bad if used as something like a body reference or if it's an accurate look at someone who could reasonably be that character.

A few examples being a Marvel hero. Take someone like Black Widow. I wouldn't bat an eye at a canon black widow profile having a few images of Scarlett since she plays her in the movie, likewise with any other character who has a 'real life' version as well as animated or comic versions.

Alternately you could have an original character but know of a model / actor / etc that is a perfect fit for how the character would look. It's not meant to be some kind of turn on, it's just a reference.

Both work fine imo, but a lot depends on context. If your character is a shota with a twelve inch penis or a six foot tall shemale with six tits, real life images aren't going to do shit for you.

Not something I see on a profile, but a mannerism.

>Someone approaches me. "LOVE THAT PROFILE!" which equates to a "Hi!" for me.

>Thank them for the compliment, ask them why they came to me specifically. Can pow-wow a bit.

>They just keep discussing things they want..no intention to actually play.

>Give them the asshole "If you don't fucking start the roleplay right now, I'm going to find someone who will. You approached me…"

>Then they ask if I can start it.

Insta-nope. Lazy cunt.

It doesn't always turn me off, but I don't care much for profiles that have passive-aggressive or outright hostile description in their custom no.

Like a big fat warning sign saying "here be drama".

>>60760

I am very very very guilty of that, but I don't plan on removing what I put on my profile because frankly I'm fucking sick of people telling me they read and enjoyed my profile but everything about their character or the scene they want to do is in my no column.

If it puts off a good player here and there then oh well, sucks for me I guess, but I've had enough of that shit and I feel the only way to get my point across is to be heavy handed as fuck about it since they can't seem to read as well as they claim.

>>52839

>Excluding profile play, of course

But that's the BIGGEST form of attentionwhoring.

>>53051

20015?

>>60778

You can do this without being a dick, tho. This is a normal dating site sort of thing. You generally avoid acting hostile or negative in regards to past relationships/experiences. Which you might say doesn't apply here, but F-list is a lot like a dating site in a lot of ways.

>>60760

>passive-aggressive nos

I practice a mild form of that on all my profiles, because having "How are you?" in No is a simple way to filter out filler conversations that annoy me and to instantly tell if somebody gave at least a cursory scan of the profile.

>>53419

This is exactly the kind of thing I try to avoid by doing that.

"Fine, just like it says under 'No' in my profile" usually gets the worst of them to shut up and pretty quick, and sometimes actually does get the halfway quality people to get to the point.

>>54302

Japanese anime characters are usually, in terms of story, meant to be Japanese.

The thing is, most anime artists can only draw maybe three distinct faces (often less), and the style for almost the entire field descends from the intentionally generic styling of early manga artists and, before them, Disney.

(I'm seriously not kidding about the face thing - look at, say, Nadia from Secret of Blue Water, compared to Shinji from Evangelion. Exactly the same face!)

On top of that, most anime characters get colored with the sort of pale skintone considered most beautiful on Japanese people, which without any real facial features or other distinctions is basically indistinguishable from "generic white person".

tl;dr shitty artists copying each other instead of learning to draw actual faces

>>60854

I don't have the patience to not be a dick about it anymore. If people wont do me the respect to at least read and acknowledge my kinks before approaching me then why should I give them any in return?

I'll live with the fact that people might think I'm an asshole for being so vocal about it since I don't get approaches from people trying to incorporate kinks I really dislike anymore.

>>60873

Pretty much this. All of this.

>>60873

As much as I want to agree to this, I can't. Being a dick to those who approach you, no matter how stupid or lazy that approach is, will result in a ban. Take note of the fact that Fai agrees with you, and he's permabanned.

>>60877

The major difference is that unlike Fai I'm not a dick towards them aside from ignoring them when it's clear they don't actually give a shit about what I'm interested in.

But honestly I don't blame him. Not everyone on F-List is terrible and if you put in the work you're sure to find someone good sooner or later, but there are a LOT of shitty people out there. A lot of people who will sing praises about your profile but be completely clueless when it comes to your kinks. A lot of people who will get on every alt they have to try and grab your attention after their first try didn't work out. A lot of people who will claim to be open to anything and then flake the second you try something that's not pure vanilla. A lot of people who always come to you with the same boring played out scenario and absolutely will not do anything else with you when you suggest something more interesting.

Since calling people out on their shit, even if you try to not be a dick about it can result in a ban as long as there's enough hurt feelings the best I can do is vent on my profile and hope that's enough to make them think "Wow this dude is a dick I'd rather not go through the trouble" while also hoping that the actually good people out there wont care, since from my personal experience people who have seemed like they'd overreact to shit were actually pretty civil when you showed that you actually have reading comprehension.

>>60877

No, I can't agree with this. If you come up to someone and blatantly disregard their profile; nay. Outright admit that you did not a read a fucking goddamn thing on their profile? You deserve whatever cock-slap in the face and ignore you get. It is beyond infuriating to have someone come up talking about how much they want to play with my characters, "But not this, or this, or this, or this, or this." "So basically just the dick and cuddling?" "Yes!" "Whilst all my kinks are directly opposed to cuddling." "Well, you could try it." "Or I could just play with someone else. Sorry."

Niggers, the lot of them.

And it's as the anon said, I may flip my lid at the stupidest shit, but if you come up and seem to have a modicum of reading comprehension? We're fucking golden. But if not? Guys. We're doing a hobby that is LITERALLY NOTHING BUT READING. YOU CAN'T BE FUCKING FAILING ON THAT SINGULAR FUCKING FRONT FROM THE WORD GO.

Triggered

>>60878

It's fine if you just put a bunch of custom No's about it. It only becomes a bannable offense if you bitch out someone to their face. Or mention autism as a custom No. See Fai for details.

>>60884

I don't know how your conversations go when you're approached, so I can't give feedback on it. If someone comes to you looking for cuddles it makes sense to turn them down. It sounds like you're just getting the lowest common denominator for partners. Any chance you could post a log or two with names removed?

>>60888

Wait a minute. Stating in my profile I don't fuck autistic can get me banned?

Uh-oh

>>60897

If you put the word autistic in your profile, and kick up enough huff about not wanting to change your phrasing to something 'nicer' (because the internet vernacular of 'autism' makes it very fucking clear what you -don't- want) you'll have mods chewing your ass / blocking people from viewing your profile for over a week, until you set up a meeting - where you wait four extra hours and just fall fucking asleep at your keyboard and throw up a white flag, because work > text fucking.

Fun note, I was having a particularly trying night emotions wise (not exactly related to F-list) and my profile got shut down / got a stern talking to by moderation because I said "Autism." in a status.

Cause my autistic tendencies were going fucking rampant and I was going into a downward spiral of self-loathing and depression that night

"We thought you meant it to other people, and they got mad about it." "Well thats neat, I didn't. So. They can go fuck off someplace for thinking I -care- about their autism." "Well you shouldn't be using it in such a manner." "Its MY OWN FUCKING AUTISM." "It doesn't matter. Other people got mad about it and thought you were referencing theirs." "No see. Thats what the kink on my profile is for. Why are you telling me to ignore people (a previous conversation), but not telling people to ignore me? This seems like a very easily fixed situation of -not folllowing what I fucking post-." "Doesn't matter."

Mother fucker what.

>>60888

It's lowest common denominator trash that can't take 'No', and when you explain 'why not' as in 'You type like a child and couldn't text-fuck out of a paper bag' they whine and cry about how you're an elitist fuck and super mean.

WHEN IT WAS BLATANTLY ON YOUR FUCKING PROFILE IN THE FIRST PLACE ABOUT YOUR A: POST LENGTH B: STANDARDS C: YOUR FUCKING WANTS.

No bitch. Get the fuck out. And after enough retards going "Waaaaaaaaaaaah your standards are 2high4me plsfuckmi Danalia" I stopped giving a fuck about treating the incompetent like they're people. "murr wanna play?" "Nope, fuck off. Thanks." "B-but I w-w-want ur d-d-dick." "And with the way you type I'm surprised you're capable of knowing what a dick is. Go away." I don't regret any of it, outside of my interactions with the moderators. I should have kissed ass more. I miss Danalia.

Although, note that a lot of this was likely just them responding to a vast swathe of spam reports by the fuck wits here / retards who don't know what the 'ignore' button is to my advertisements. Inb4 you bring up 'Its all cause your flooding of adverts' - this was actually never a thing brought up by moderation outside of my advertisements being 'Off-topic' which is.. Well fucking silly, but that's another conversation.

>>60901

You're a nerd

t. Myron Gaines

Results from http://bdsmtest.org/

90% Dominant

86% Primal (Hunter)

79% Vanilla

79% Daddy/Mommy

77% Ageplayer

Nooooope

>>60901

You seem to have a knack for pissing people off. And, thanks to Swiss Miss there's a good chance anyone resembling your character type will be banned. What I don't get is how people can be banned when the rules boil down to one thing: Don't be a dick.

On the topic of the thread, anytime someone lists alternate forms. Unless they're a werewolf or something.

>>61253

Cause I'm a dick.

And think defamation is a good way to prevent poor behaviors from continuing. Having someone APPROACH YOU, respond for ten minutes, and then go, 'I just reached X part of your profile never fucking mind you sick fuck" is beyond mentally incompetent and should not be acceptable in any form with a hobby based like this.

Aka; I named and shamed retards who came up to me behaving like retards a lot. A few thanked me for it later. Most behaved liked victims (which they were in a sense). Getting told "Well you should just ignore it" when I would have filled up the list in a week, is not a suitable answer.

On topic;

>I don't think I'll meet your length requirements b-but could we still play?

No.

Why would you think you're an exception?

I haven't gotten an answer yet.

Xe/Xir horseshit. Just no. No pronoun horseshit, ever.

A hard no to loli/shota/objectionable kink here because they equate it with actual meatspace depravity instead of a fantasy acted out between two adults. If you don't like that stuff then fine, just say no, but why you gotta be calling people disgusting and channeling the ghost of Wertham.

Not typing fluently. If it's ESL, I don't judge so much, but I really prefer my partners to be literate and fluent. Also, actions in asterisks. Fuck that noise. Quotes for speech or bust. And for god's sake why would you do both?!

NO SEX ALL FETISH. I can get this, sort of, but for me that's like going to the fanciest steak house in town and getting a plate full of ketchup. No judging but that's just not for me and we're not gonna be able to come to a compromise on that.

Profile play is alright as long as it's like, X did this to me, I fucked Y. I ain't doing any of that master/slave/mate shit, fuck right off with that. Also this for people asking if you're a real whatever. Or any IRL stuff at all. Don't ask me about that shit.

…Passwords I can understand if only because of the sheer amount of people who don't fucking seem to read profiles at all, especially "no" lists, but don't make it a goddamn Easter egg hunt.

>>52820

>Those profiles that are all about getting back at some sort of female workplace figure

I add this because I understand some people can't control their dick, but I've literally seen people politicise their porn and it got them off and I am 100% not about that life

>Awful spelling/grammer

Obviously

>Overtly chan-centric culture euphemisms like unironically using words like "SJW" and "cuck"

Mmm

>Being the character Vivian James

Nope

Also being a faceclaim of an obvious canon is pretty bad. I can get being a faceclaim of some obscure JRPG character, but when your profile literally has like 4 pics of Yoko Littner and it clearly isn't her, it gets annoying. And on a similar note, playing a canon character very inaccurately unless it's a noted AU version of said character.

"Rules" for how to talk to them, especially when they're the one who approached me first.

I don't care if your profile says not to talk about the random friend requests you send to everybody, I'm going to do it anyway.

>>61311

>Profile play is alright as long as it's like, X did this to me, I fucked Y. I ain't doing any of that master/slave/mate shit, fuck right off with that. Also this for people asking if you're a real whatever. Or any IRL stuff at all. Don't ask me about that shit.

This is a big, blaring thing for me.

I grow weary when people INTERRUPT A DAMN GOOD ROLEPLAY just to ask me if I have skype or some external communication means. The hell do you think I'm on F-List for?

That, and profile play horrifies me to no end.

>Seek out certain profiles that fit kink needs.

>Find a profile. "Huh, picture's weird, but I guess it's some in-joke or something. Some are clever!"

>Go into profile. "THIS CHARACTER HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY TURNED INTO TWO GALLONS OF CUM AND AN INCREASED SAG IN <SOME OTHER CHARACTER'S> BALLS FOR GOOD! I'M NEVER COMING BACK!"

>Start to see the same picture, and that same person has "eradicated" many desirable "once individual" profiles in the name of cock/ass/oral perma-vore.

Fuck profile vore exclamations. In fact, fuck vore in general. If you're food/cum or whatever and not what your profile was originally advertised, remove your kinks or something. Don't keep hopes up and stuff.

>Profile is perfectly written. Nice description, little to no errors etc.

>Talk to them.

>Their first line is: "sure i'd love to play. any ideas"

Instant turn off.

https://www.f-list.net/c/robocop%20leoma/

>>62604

This feels like a weird metajoke. No one could have seriously made that profile.

>>62603

If you approach them don't you have ideas in mind?

>>62688

Not to get all psychoanalyst (okay, maybe a bit) but I always saw this kind of profile and attitude as like…

Basically, they're so afraid that people won't actually like them that they construct an online persona that's an asshole, so if someone doesn't like them? It's fine, it's just their stupid internet persona they don't like, not the REAL them, so they don't have to risk their feelings being hurt.

Similarly, wrapping profiles up in an air of ironic self deprecation is just another way of avoiding any kind of criticism. It's pretty hard for someone to go "Yo, your profile is shit, why is it shit?" when you've gone out of your way to include stuff that makes it look shitty on purpose.

I'm absolutely not a psychiatrist or anything, but that's the way it always looked to me; people so afraid of being criticized, whether for their writing talent or their personality, that they pre-emptively call their writing/kinks/whatever shit and tell you what an asshole they are.

>>61575

Holy fuck you'd be having a field day with a player I come across often. They play TF games and every single TF they get is permanent.

End result? They create 2-3 new characters PER DAY. Completely identical profile.

I'm not sure what they do with the spent ones.

>>61409

>Overtly chan-centric culture euphemisms like unironically using words like "SJW" and "cuck"

>Being the character Vivian James

This 100%

I once played with a Vivian James character and the scene itself was pretty allright, but whenever we chatted OOC they didn't mention ANYTHING but GamerGate this, SJW's that, Moot's a cuck and for someone who's apparently so into videogames they're fucking retarded when it comes to them. Like seriously, this sort of stuff was all they seemed to care about.

Then they blocked me because I apparently was supporting censorship for mentioning that i'd be more interested in playing the "Réalta Nua" version of Fate/Stay Night as the sexscenes in the original are poorly written trash and distract from the overall story from what I've seen of them.

Oh, and once they flipped out because I mentioned I mentioned that they "had to take a break from the computer" after I said it.

Not knowing basic anatomy. Also squirting is the dumbest thing. Finally, what the fuck is with the cervix penetration?

I'll readily admit I'm a guy who has only played female characters, but I try to be realistic. I have never squirted or done shit that is either anatomically impossible or unlikely. If you can't play a gender accurately, simply don't.

>X is a god older than the universe

>age: infinity

>kinks:

>ageplay

>farting

Shit like this always makes me laugh

>shortstacks

>Verified

>furries

>smug anime pictures

>butthurt no customs

>Drama in no

>>62847

>implying only people who play squirting or cervical penetration are dudes or just people who dun know about anatomy

Dude, chill. Ever heard of something called willing suspension of disbelief? I'm a girl and I get off on cervical penetration, it ties in well with my over-the-top breeding kinks when that dirty womb gets penetrated and given a direct dosage of cum. And you know what else, I enjoy when the climax includes a description of overflowing cum making it's way through fallopian tubes to claim the mature ovum inside, even though I know fertilization is not instantaneous and I know fertilization in such a spot would likely end in a health-threatening ectopic pregnancy.

It's a fantasy, everyone gets off to different things. It's cool if your erp fap material involves "Must be possible in real life," but gee, tone down the snobby "they like a kink I don't like, they must know nothing of basic anatomy" attitude.

>>62873

Your profile reads like it was written by an autistic friend of mine, you act like them too.

Is that you ImThem?

>>62874

Nah, man. Just another autist on the internet, m'goy.

>>62854

You are projecting just as much. Except at least in my experience, it's usually some guy doing it who sucks at finishing a scene who does that.

>>62882

Shit that was redundant as fuck now that i read it.

>>62882

They aren't really projecting at all nor have they accused the original poster of projecting.

"If you can't play a gender accurately, simply don't." is a hilarious statement to make in the context of ERP. Nothing wrong with liking realistic depictions in roleplay, but that doesn't mean everyone has to either. I get that this is a thread where you post your "nopes" but they could've just posted how they don't like it and been done with it.

>>62882

What is >>62854 even projecting, you dense fuck? I know you see this word used a lot and effectively at that against professional victims and moralfags, but you can't just use big words at the grownup table and win without knowing what they mean.

50 million custom kinks like so:

https://www.f-list.net/c/Eatriggon%20Hex

>transgender mtf characters who stress ignoring male parts, and will never reference them in any way, and the player will get angry for doing so.

You can RP as anything you want. Why would you not just RP as a girl?

Anal. I fucking hate that shit. I mean literally, it's about fucking someone's shit hole. They shit from there. It's basically scat.

>>63057

>not liking the feeling of two thick cocks rubbing together in your ass and pussy

It's quite something.

>>63058

>implying I'm talking about the female perspective

>>63061

Two cocks rubbing together inside your ass is pretty hot too.

>>63068

And that goes if you're a man OR a woman.

>>63057

To be fair, the vagina is not any less sanitary of a hole. The microbial on goings of a pussy are pretty disgusting when you get down to it. To say nothing of the horrid state that is someone's mouth. I'm not saying that you should like anal, but like there are ways to clean both of the other holes used for penetrative pleasure, there are ways to make it more sanitary than normal as well. Judge it because it's too out there for you, not because it's gross. Sex in and of itself is fucking gross when you get down to it…

>>63070

Actually, the vagina, despite the fact that is is very much also quite nasty, is MUCH more sanitary. Just because two things are less than clean does not mean they are equally fucked.

>>63071

The point isn't any less prevalent though. Sexual organs are all gross, and there are ways to make them clean enough for safer usage. People have been doing anal with effective means of protection and hygiene for quite a while, and the biggest risks are generally with those that don't make use of these practices. Equating it to a kink that focuses on the filthiest aspect of it specifically seems very misinformed. It's one thing to enjoy anal, and it's another thing entirely to like muddy dick.

>>63052

I imagine that has something to do with sort of orgasm denial and humiliation? At least that's what i think whenever i read a custom kink about ignoring a cock, they don't want to get pleasure by rubbing their member, instead they want to have some cock in their hole to make them cum like a real girl.

Do these characters you speak of reach orgasm? If not then i think it's safe to assume they like to get teased and not cum, if they do reach orgasm but only though their prostate then it's humiliation.

Just my two cents.

Lately it's:

BBC, large cocks, adultery, multiple partners in the favs

small cocks, romance, males in the no

Also seeing that a female or shemale is "Bi" or "Pansexual" only to see the males kink in the no plus a custom Males kink saying it doesn't like men. Makes me want to send them definitions of the sexuality and then /ignore them if i wasn't sure they'd complain to some Mod.

>>52820

Fucking SCAT. ANYONE with that shit on their FAVE list I will immediately disregard. Fuck that. Shit isn't even a fetish it's fucking waste.

>>63073

Actually, it's really not. See, scat (which you are grievously misinformed about) is about a lot of things, and is actually safely enjoyed by many people in exactly the same way that you described about anal. My point is simply that I dislike anal for the same reason I dislike scat – because they are quite literally related.

>>63174

You know that not everyone who likes scat needs to have it in every single RP, right?

Did they have any custom kink saying all their fave kinks were absolutely mandatory? If not then try to ask them if it is. More than likely the person isn't gonna mind putting their own kinks aside just to get some play.

>Body hair

>musk

>forskin

>abuse

My personal, somewhat narrow experience is that these kinks are never mandatory for the people who enjoy them. Now that's fine- I won't rp without an anal element but none of those are my cuppa

>>63201

jesus fuck. Wanted to say "optional" Must lovers in particular are guilty of never being able to go without the stink

>>62873

Fair enough, sorry about that! The memeing/'lol look at how terrible this shit is' felt weirdly forced, somehow, so rather than coming off like you actually don't care, it kinda felt - to me at least - like… well, like what I wrote a long, rambling, stupid post about. :V

>>53125

If you don't have system kinks in your profile, you can't be searched in the search engine. I don't know why more people don't use it, as it's the best way for me to proactively find people. If nothing else, at least use the fancy collapseable thing and just put them at the bottom.

https://www.f-list.net/c/syia%20revlari/

I find that people who list tons of extreme kinks, but are humble and discrete about them, or perhaps even listed somewhere just to make it clear that those kinks weren't absolutely necessary if their partner's not into it tend to make for the best roleplayers. It speaks volumes about their own character too as a person.

>>62873

>"memeing" on F-list

You are the cancer.

>>52833

I've never seen the whole 'password' thing but alot of my friends bitch about it. Example?

>>63493

It's basically people who hide codewords that NEEEEED to be mentioned to them in your opening post to prove that you read their profile in and out.

>>52833

I've never seen the whole 'password' thing but alot of my friends bitch about it. Example?

>>53177

> Shit will make me as sour as a sourpussycat made out of lemons.

kek

>>53607

Hoholy fuckin' shit. I've talked to this guy a few times and he's a huge piece of shit.

>>52820

Any type of raceplay at all.

Example: https://www.f-list.net/c/Hanna%20Koizumi/

Cuckholding with raceplay and white inferiority is pretty hot, but this bitch won't do it for me so I'm pretty niffed.

Male-herms/Cuntboys in the no or maybe section is a huuuugee turn off for me.

>Shittaste

Also those bitchy people with post lengths, TOS, No 'hi-hello' really erk me.

Jerked off thinking about how Hanna wouldn't fuck me tbh

Not sure if this is autism or nope.

It's both.

https://www.f-list.net/c/Slendywoman

>>63201

When you say foreskin, do you mean like foreskin play, or one of the participants just so happening to be uncut?

Because I'd say the former bothers me just cause I don't find it sexy, but not the latter.

>>63058

How would you know?

>>63530

>they always show up when I do a search

>they're always posting an advertisement in one of my rooms

It's annoying.

>>63539

All of it really. I find forskin to be disgusting

>>63526

Hey, Hanna here. I don't like cucks because they are creepy, and cucking is a paraphilia that actually hurts people. Raceplay isn't realistic and the only people who actually tattoo QoS on themselves are fat women in their 50s, but cucking is a real thing that mentally destroys people, even if they request it.

Sorry for being a moralfag, but there is my reason. Sorry.

>>63555

Oy vey, such a good goy!

>>63573

This is the reason why I'm completely neutral and refuse to banter until I get the goods. Too many times in the past have I got chummy with people, and when the I ask them for RP they pull shit like this.

Can somebody make some kind of bot to automatically send a note to any character that has "FUTA/FEMALE/HERM ONLY" on their profile with some kind of mean or aggressive message?

>>63585

>Wah how dare people not find males attractive

Fucking yaoifags

>>63586

>I don't find males attractive.

>BUT MASSIVE DICKS ON A GIRL ARE AWESOME. HUGLUGLUG.

If your character is female and set to "gay" then they are a lesbian and are attracted to women.

>shortstacks

>a billion commissioned pictures

>emoticons

>bitchy customs

>smug anime face

>smug anime personality

>>63587

>If your character is female and set to "gay" then they are a lesbian and are attracted to women.

Agreed there, but that's hardly a condemnation of everyone who loves girlcock.

>>63587

Sure, but you can also complain about people with "bi - female preference" and doing the same thing

It's more the fault of f-list not really giving a good option for this

But you should really calm down about people's preferences

>>63587

what >>63607 said. Flist has no "generic erp female" alignment of sexuality. If there was some tumblr-tier term for women and girlcock we'd all be on that shit. But there's not, so deal.

>>63618

F-List could easily assess all their color/genders, and put a "alignment slider" when setting that preference on a character.

Straight←————–|————→Gay

and the | in the middle could be moved to indicate your bisexuality scale. Maybe modifiers to add if you crave girldick or not. I dunno.

>>63573

>>63578

I'm guilty of doing this with two partners, who claimed to be writers. I am not a writer. I peaked years ago. There is no way I can match walls of text, so I wonder if you're doing that to flaunt your ability to people who can't match. Plus I don't have time for long RPs so I'd end up leaving in between.

And it would suck more for you in the end. It's like trying to have a conversation with a language barrier. I'd rather not waste anyone's time.

And finally it just intimidates me. I end up worrying if I'm taking too long in between replies, worrying about sounding repetitive, worrying about sounding vague, etc. It frankly worrys me.

I realize I'm going to get flamed for this. Rather be flamed here anonymously than mid RP because I'm not good enough.

>>63621

>I realize I'm going to get flamed for this

It depends what you consider walls of texts, I've had one line shitters consider a minimum of five lines to be walls of text before but if it's something like 20 lines then that's a little more forgivable.

>>63622

Depends what you mean by a line. On a 1080p monitor with default font and maximized window size, I've had people bust out 10 lines out of nowhere and I knew there was no way I could match that. If you mean 5 SENTENCES then sure, that's no issue at all, but even 5 lines is pushing it in the middle of some random smut scene. What would you even be describing at this point, how X body part feels?

>>63624

I see this a lot, namely, "Where do the words get used?" people seem to have a hard time imagining it, but sometimes I feel like I can go into an infinite amount of detail on describing something and I feel it's harder to use LESS words

Me/Danalia/someone else should drop a few of their bigger rp posts in here to give an example of what the words get used on

>>63626

I would actually love to read an example RP which could give me an idea on how a good roleplay should look

>>63620

That'd be broken too, because what if you're only into males and females but nothing inbetween, or any other combination like that?

The best system would just be to just give each user a list of every gender and let them check off only the ones they're interested in RPing with, then put their list in their profile info. Like this -

>Age: 19

>Gender: Male-Herm

>Interested In: Herms, Male-Herms, Shemales

>>63620

I'd say a grid system. All the f-list genders and a colour scheme to match the kinks

Green: Fave

Blue: Yes

Yellow: Maybe

Red: No

Make it a profile tab or pop out. I'm looking for ways to address the crying earlier by making the whole thing unambiguous. None of this "your 20 degrees gay! that means you like my dick" bullshit. Of course in this perfect world of mine we'd have separate herm/futa/shemale distinctions as well

>Wall of text about dos and don'ts

>Elaborate RPG-style character description with stats and all

>scat

Also, I find the "transgender" option a bit weird, since you can be any gender you like. (Which is why there aren't any TGs on fucking Star Trek.)

>>63626

I wish I had something to give. I accidentally deleted all my 10k+ character long posts, and I've been middling at 3-7k with only one person lately )=.

>>63639

This though. Ahri best slutsune

>>63649

>Also, I find the "transgender" option a bit weird, since you can be any gender you like.

Agreed. I personally wish I was a girl in real life, so what do I do? RP as a girl character.

Instead I find a lot of transgender characters used for smut are just reflections of very conflicted people in real life. Otherwise, it is very possible to RP hardships of someone who wants to be a different gender in a realistic setting, but when those aren't touched upon it just seems strange to me, like it's a cry for attention.

>>63682

>>63649

I mean, kink preferences make little sense and there's no blanket reason for people to pick any one gender. These comments, to me, sound as ridiculous as if someone said:

>I find the "romance" and "dating" kinks a bit weird, since you can go out and date someone romantically in real life already.

>>63730

You can't compare using that. A better comparison would be making a character that has, for example, brown eyes and complaining that they always wanted blue eyes or something. But instead of ever roleplaying that scene, you just fuck and never bring it up.

>>63735

But you're just making that comparison because you don't understand the psychological aspect players might enjoy in a certain kink or body preference, though. Instead, you guys just lump every transgender-character-playing person into "they're projecting" because, well, I guess that makes you feel like you're a genius psychologist? It's not like transgenders are the only ones that can make self-inserts and get obsessively sensitive about them.

It's darn easy to see how it might appeal to someone to play a character that is struggling with their body image, one that is simply deluded with themselves, or one that wants to focus on gender tf but always start off the "wrong" gender. Hell, there's a bunch of reasons why you'd pick transgender as your character's gender, whether it's related to a specific set of kinks or a psychological angle you want to explore. Hell, even if it's a tg person wanting to play as a character they over-identify with, it's not like all of them are going to be horrible at it, so why the strawmaning?

But erp minds are apparently some of the most uncreative and close-minded, and the moment you don't share a kink, it either doesn't make sense under any circumstance, the player behind it is ignorant on the topic, or is autistic. So congrats on being the sole sane players, with the only kinks that have ever made sense ever?

>>63814

Shit bro I never said all were like that. No need to go on a selfrighteous rant. Plenty of people shit on my preferences ITT but unlike you, I realize this is a thread of opinions and I'm not about to get upset.