/erp/ - Erotic Roleplay

>>53871

Is there an actual concern or is this just spam?

Besides deleting amusing threads, I don't exactly see why he's either. Whats with this retards nigger faggot ideology?

>>53873

Which ones? The only things I've deleted for the past few months are the spam threads /sp/ and their ilk make to nab GETs

>>53879

Oh, they deleted like three-or-four Fai threads that were pretty fucking hilarious, and another hate thread that the entirety of /tg/ was getting ass hurt about on F-list but I understand if those are considered spam or whatever.

…And that might have been like half a year ago. I haven't been posting as much so.

>>53888

Hm, can't say I remember, sorry. Depending on how far back it was, they might've just gotten pruned during the spam events we had in the past, but I'm not sure.

If there's ever any decision we make that you disagree with for any reason, or if you have any concerns or comments or the like, post on the board or email me - I'm not omnipresent, but I try to get on as much as I can and keep an eye on things, and I want to make this board a good place for everyone. Hell, let's turn this thread into a call for just that in case anyone has anything they've been meaning to say but haven't for whatever reason.

So guys, anything that makes you think we're, as OP put it, total faggot niggers?

>>53889

I think its just the guy whining about his spam threads being kicked, because generally the moderation of this (besides deleting all the extra-fun Fai threads) has been golden. Let me get my ass handed to me / 10. Its enjoyable.

>>53891

Figured that was the case, but hey, if anyone has a genuine complaint or concern, I do want to hear it. This board isn't my personal plaything - it's for you guys. I just want to do what I can to make it work for all of you.

>>53871

I'm pretty sure you mean 'are the mods faggots, or niggers?'

>>53901

Well now here's a sight for sore eyes~

>why are you deleting my ego trips and attention threads

The only problem of this board is in this thread, but hey.

>>53904

Honestly, if Fai is the problem you recognize and not the spammers, I'm just glad we're keeping them under control enough not to disrupt things too much for you guys.

>>53909

Spammers are not a problem precisely because you keep them on a leash. Never said that's not good.

>let's turn this thread into a call for just that in case anyone has anything

If spammers were a problem I'd say that. I did not.

>>53911

It's the least I can do Anon. Only wish we could prevent them entirely.

>>53918

Exactly, and I'm glad they're not posing a problem for you all.

>>53904

I nuke Faithreads occasionally if they're particularly obnoxious, but mostly the problem is dealt with by ignoring it.

>>54010

Basically I consider that if a thread has turned into everybody calling everybody nigger faggot asshole cocksuckers, it's no longer on topic and therefore nukeable. Unless the subject is someone's nigger faggot asshole cocksucker fetish, in which case sure, whatever.

>>54011

Which is why I've never really complained that much about it. It's an understandable deletion, no matter how hilarious they end up being to read.

>>54014

>>54010

As long and the problematic element is not complaining it's all fine. Look away and ignore, it'll work itself out.

>>54011

Isn't the solution here janitoring individual offensive posts to preserve the existing content?