/erp/ - Erotic Roleplay

>>54580

I'm a lot like you, I find it easier to just slip into a character like a skin to work in, and then just be a lewd slut pleasuring my partner <3

You're fooling yourself is you seriously think most of /erp/ does more than just standard cybering and text-fucking with little to no character development or plot. You're the norm.

>>54586

Really? The way a lot act around here gives the impression that everyone is serious about ERP and does it as a hobby, having several hour sessions without masturbating.

Not having a cheeky lewd 10-20 minute textfuck, sometimes even quicker.

>>54580

I did it one.

And I fall in love. Shit.

I don't blame people who don't want to do long term stuff.

There's nothing more frustrating than thinking up an scene you want to do, finding a partner who seems like a good match, talking it out with them to bounce ideas back and forth and then just having fucking nothing happen because they decided to vanish off the face of the earth just before or shortly after you start. Some people around here are pretty fucking guilty of this.

Time is valuable to me and if I had to choose between trying to get something long term going with the high risk that the person I'm planning with will flake or do a short scene where we just cut right to the chase with little/no build up then I'll probably take the latter, assuming I haven't decided to save myself even more time by just jerking it to a doujin or something.

>>54612

Yep, I know what that one is like. Never ends well.

>>54613

Because as the post below you has explained, I really want to become genuinely interested in writing long term stories with others. I love the concept of roleplaying, I love using imagination to create and immerse yourself in competently unique worlds, experiences and… Lewd… Scenes…

It's something I really, really want to get into but can never do so. And when I have done the shorter things with people, sometimes the reaction gets irritated that I'm not taking it seriously and would rather use it as a tool to pleasure myself to.

>>54615

I do fear I'll never advance on my journey, I'll just use others and them use me as nothing more as a means to fuck myself until I'm drained.

I've been looking more into conventional RP and giving up ERP entirely… At least with conventional RP I'll lose the excuse of wanting to masturbate, and do it purely for entertainment.

I wouldn't know where to start with that though.

>>54616

This isn't about time wasting either, I've had several stable partners in the past… Some exclusive.

With all of them, it's always been quick sessions to feel good together.

They wouldn't have dropped out suddenly and leave me alone if we were doing extended things.

>>54618

If you're serious about doing something with story, drop the sex altogether then and pursue regular RP like you want. No story devotes 1/3rd of it's entirety to descriptions about orgasms and fucking.

Start anywhere. Start being a cute girl and have the story be a fucking, romantic relationship with some stupid twit or something. Be a fucking manager of a grocery store relegating employees for menial tasks over the graveyard shift, and throw in twists like everything fucking going offline and eldritch abominations springing from the darkness to murder anything with flesh.

F-list is not the place for anything related to a story - as much as people like to say they 'love' story.

It is a porn site.

You are on a site, where everything is about fucking.

One way or another, it's accepted that even the story-heaviest, or non-lewd focused of things on there, will have 'some' lewdness. Blowjobs to calm a potential combatant between D&D rolls, prostitution to earn gold for a journey, big-breasted queens and ravenous, concubine surrounded kings. It's difficult to find any person on F-list who actually shys away from that when doing something more serious. You may be fine with that, but it flares my autism like nothing else personally. I wouldn't mind if people wore it on their sleeve and just kind of accepted it. But fuck damn. "Story-focused group!"

>But one moment, we gotta elaborate on how the queen has fucked a thousand men and stinks of jizz.

>>54619

I guess my ideals would be better fit for conventional roleplaying - I can always keep lustful desires separately and go masturbate to porn or something. Now begs the question of where would be the most ideal place to start this.

Online D&D/Pathfinder games? Is there alive RP designated boards?

>>54620

>Online D&D/Pathfinder games

Roll20.net or Myth-weavers.com's forums. /tg/'s Looking for Game threads over on the other Chan might be worth trying too, but I've never pulled a game out of there myself.

>>54620

Not really, no. But if you're into more canonical settings - and fine with forum posting. There is a plethora of online RP boards that exist for basically any and all universes you can think up.

/tg/ is kind of cancerous at times, but its better than nothing. I peruse Chatango for my more silly / less sexual roleplays whenever I'm feeling like just having fun with writing stupid bullshit.

And mind above, my hatred of sex-in-story mostly stems from various ideas that a movie isn't porn, so it shouldn't behave like one at any point, unless its very blatant about that aspect from the word go - like uh. I don't know. Some fucking famous movie. The Avengers I guess, isn't going to have a porn shoot in the middle where hulk cluster fucks every single woman in the series with close ups on his cock.

If you can handle sluts being sluts in the middle of something that is supposed to be world building - F-list will give you a few things to work with.

>>54623

You seem like a great mentor with sensible ideals. Would that I not probably end up wasting your time I would have annoyed you to take me under your wing.

I'll go and try out some fantasy RP forums to begin with then, hopefully if I start casually and without pressure I can slowly draw myself into it.

>>54666

Oh I don't know, wouldn't partners leave more bad habits on me than good?

If I was to start frequenting lewd pairings on here for example, wouldn't I be more likely to fall victim to the same complaints I'm reading in this thread just so I can conform to the norm?

Wouldn't be much of a positive journey if that is the case.

>>54680

I actually don't have any of that. It's embarrassing to admit, but F-List has always intimidated me… From the outside it looks so professional and serious, something I've never been when it comes to ERP so I've always tended to avoid it.

Though should your musings be right, I would have probably had no problem fitting in there. All I would have needed is a bog standard character, a couple of kinks and in insatiable lust.

The problem with this thread is that:

1. ERP is not equal to world / character development / creation, nor is "normal" RP;

2. Fai is pushing the OP more and more to the first point of view because of his stigmas towards ERP.

Fai, you are no diferent than those people who bash ERP because it's an "inferior form of RP which doesn't bring anything to the table", I can see why people think you're a fucking jackass.

To the OP: Roleplaying a duel and roleplaying sex is basically the same thing, and of course you can build a world / setting around sex, just as much as you can build a world / setting around duels. I don't have much to say in terms of how to help you with motivation, I just wanted to tell you to be careful with what Fai says, because he is speaking nonsence. Focusing on "normal RPs" wont really magically make you better at world building.

Sounds to me like your situation would be really suited to MMO roleplay. You can hop into things whenever you want and scale/nurture things to your liking. If you want to ERP it's really easy, too.

>>54709

I'm not saying its an inferior form of roleplay. But you know damn fucking well the 'character development' in /erp/ is bullshit. It's inconsequential, it's almost entirely devoid of meaning or purpose besides titillation.

View it as text-fucking, not some deep, complexe interwoven web of character interactions when in reality it the tried and true rigmarole of getting fucked up the ass until you start to like it, breaking, and then loving it.

…and where was I saying that it would make them better at world building? They -are- better for World Building. That's just, fucking objectively fact. When the sole focus is text-fucking, you aren't going to talk about the looming medieval architecture that was reminiscent of third period Romans with a flair of Chinese arches and tiled roofs, with the demi-human guards being little more than scaley abomiantions with little for a face. You're going to be talking about the tight leather top wrapped around your tits and how sweat is beading down your chest from the burning sun.

And you say this like I haven't made my bias abundantly clear, multiple times.

>>54716

>I'm not saying its an inferior form of roleplay. But you know damn fucking well the 'character development' in /erp/ is bullshit. It's inconsequential, it's almost entirely devoid of meaning or purpose besides titillation.

1. Yes you are, every single time you have the chance;

2. That's not for you to decide. World and character development are a big part of ERP for me.

>View it as text-fucking, not some deep, complexe interwoven web of character interactions when in reality it the tried and true rigmarole of getting fucked up the ass until you start to like it, breaking, and then loving it.

Same thing as above, you're full of shit. Nothing of this makes sense. Stop pretending that just because it is made to arouse it is devoid of any sort of world development what-so-ever.

>…and where was I saying that it would make them better at world building? They -are- better for World Building. That's just, fucking objectively fact.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…

Done.

>When the sole focus is text-fucking…

You are an idiot. Again, erotic roleplaying can be much more than fucking, and again, just because a world has many battles, that doesn't mean that it only has "text-fighting". Fuck off with this already. A world will have the things you want the world to have, and detaching architecture from ERP is frankly one of the most stupid things I've heard all day. Again, to me I really feel you believe "other" forms of RP are way more deep and worthwhile than disgusting and filthy ERP. You should try dropping christian stigma, we've moved on dude (or are trying to).

>And you say this like I haven't made my bias abundantly clear, multiple times.

Then if you care either stop spewing shit as advice or make it abundantly clear in your post that you've been proven wrong several times, and that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Remember kids: knowing wrong is worst than not knowing. Missinformation will kill you and rape your dog.

Even if this isn't really missinformation, since it would take a whole total of two braincells and 5 minutes to derive and extrapolate the idea that what you're saying is wrong and that you're a fucking retard.

Sure, the same way I like having a quick spy RP where I have to gather info on some secret society that is threatening to rule the world through the thread of nuclear apocalipse, I sometimes like to engage in quick dirty ERP that maybe involves seducing the priest so he is denounced from his position because he touched my leg. But I don't like those things all the time, and I very much prefer a fleshed out world to play in. And this goes back to my previous point, no kind of RP implies a more or less fleshed out universe / characters. Sure, you may build an universe for a certain purpose, and if that purpose is to get you off you'll populate worlds with sexy races or something, but to be honest, a universe is rarely built for only one form of RP since that would be retarded and since AGAIN, RP and the world are two very separate and well distinct things.

Tl;dr: stop pretending ERP is a special kind of RP; stop pretending world building is attached to RP.

>>54716

> When the sole focus is text-fucking, you aren't going to [architecture]

Really? Good to know the next time my sole focus is on writing poetry, I won't be debating the socioeconomic impact of Big Oil with my transnigger aunt.

Unrelated: Not everyone's sole purpose in erp is to text-fuck. If yours is, congrats, but I started a monstergirl erp in Feburary and it's basically been 100% character development and 0% text-fucking.

>>54722

>That's not for you to decide. World and character development are a big part of ERP for me.

Really? Alright. Tell me. How many times do you re-use a setting with a -different- partner? How many times has your erotic roleplays had any sort of lasting affect on your character? Have you ever shelved a character because their story or arc has been completed through a roleplay? I highly doubt you can answer most of these with a positive. So you know what makes all that world building you did with that partner you fucked three months ago, for four weeks?

Inconsequential to your character in it's entirety. Completely and utterly devoid of purpose. There was no development, because according to your profile and character, nothing happened and you're back to being a clean slate. It may be 'fun' for you, but in the end it does -fuck all- to your character. It develops nothing. Meaning, there is no fucking development. The paragraphs you wasted on the world, amounted to literally fuck-all besides a more enjoyable role playing experience.

>Same thing as above, you're full of shit. Nothing of this makes sense. Stop pretending that just because it is made to arouse it is devoid of any sort of world development what-so-ever.

Alright, kindly tell me if that world you made between two people is ever going to be used again? That it has any sort of permanency on the character in any fucking regard outside of play with your sole partner? It's fucking ephemeral. To say that there's development of any sort shoots the word development in the fucking face, because it gets reset with every other partner, every other time. There may be development within the RP, but it affects the majority of the characters here NONE. It's an in-universe, by in-universe basis that is unknown and untouchable by any of the other potential partners you have. You start at a basis, and work your way up.

And then you forgo doing absolutely fucking anything with it. I can make up a half dozen worlds on the fly, but I wouldn't call it 'World Building' whilst I exposition it to my partner because there is literally nothing there besides the world, for that specific partner.

>You are an idiot. Again, erotic roleplaying can be much more than fucking,

You are an idiot for not understand that I make little to no distinction between text-fucking and hyper-lewd, erotic world's that are meant to bring out the 'eroticism' in ERP. They are one in the same. If I only confined ERP to when I actually fucked things, the vast swathe of my logs would not fall under this category. They are masturbatory material with their multitude of references to a general world - generally depraved and raunchy in nature to keep the heat flowing between sexual sessions - which means that it overall, arouses you.. which.. you know. Means they are erotic.

If you're roleplaying as normal,a nd just throw sex in there every so often for the fucking giggles; Look at The Avengers example. That's fucking retarded and you should feel bad for thinking that it in any way constitutes as something worthwhile or good.

Christian Stigma :^) Fuckin' kek.

>cont'd

>>54739

>>54722

In Danalia's world there are no male's and towers are capped with impaled, worthless fuck pigs to display the the lesser lot their potential end-result for being useless, that dwarves and gnomes are all but extinct and used as slave labor and treated akin to trash. Is that 'world building'? I would never fucking say so, because that is so simple and trite. That absolutely fuck-all to be proud of. It's nothing to go, "Man, look at my super-cool fantasy setting where every thing is sexualized dat is so dope!" Those paltry amounts of exposition can be spewed forth in -any- roleplay within seconds. But unless I'm specifically going around, making certain to show the strange and benign aspects of the erotic world in some fucked up loopy manner to every person I play with, it is entirely fucking devoid of purpose - because they aren't there for that. They're there for your character and the sex revolving around said character. It's an embellishing note, but I would never say I 'built a world' because I mentioned off-handly whilst going through the street the duke regent regularly kidnaps hobos to slaughter them like pigs and gut them for his feasts along with a handful of other dribble to make the setting slightly more realized than Medieval Metropolis 2.0. That's just fucking building upon already established tropes and archetypes. You aren't fucking building a world, you're filling the blanks with bullshit to may be touch upon later.

And I do think regular RP does world-building in a much more cohesive and functional way. You know why? Because there isn't much to get sidetracked by the way of just how tightly your fucking ass is cupped by your trousers. There isn't going to be any lines about how the sweltering heat makes the light stench of your sweat tickle at your partner's nose. You can say those things, yeah. But those are besides the point - and any needless eroticism thrown in is disregarded as off-hand silliness, and ignored - whilst the meat and main focus of the RP is the world and your character's interactions with it.

But I get the feeling you're someone who responds to a detailed and described character walking into a lightly touched upon shanty town, with a description of said shanty town and two lines of paltry text about your own character - when it was previously stated that it was meant to be something more heavily focused on the actual lewd depravity of the interactions between your two characters. The point just flies right fucking above you. Sure, it's neat you fuckin' did that. But you aren't -there- for that.

>>54739

>>54740

Holy shit, you're so retarded that no discussion is needed for everyone to see how retarded you are.

Congratulations bud.

>>54750

Glad to hear it, pal.

>>54580

Local namefag ruins everything.

Try ask later.

>>54765

>Local name fag ruins everything

>Thread was going fine until dipshits stirred up shit because they can't comprehend the idea that their world development does fuck-all and develops nothing for their character besides 'muh setting' and that the idea of calling the shit we make for text-fucking as a 'world' is a backhand to the concept of crafting proper worlds.

>>54765

But I actually agree with the namefag, from what I've seen it often hits the nail on the head completely.

I'm sure there are those that genuinely enjoy the roleplay and descriptive story, but wouldn't I be more likely to find that in conventional RP than ERP, where many others treat it in the same way I outlined in the OP?

>>54769

Once again, world / character development has nothing to do with RPing. It can be done through RPing, but mostly it isn't.

Now let me break this down for you: in a world, the battle of wateverthefucksvania can be less or more important than that time the king kept his servant in his basement and pumped her full of cum, leading to the birth of the prince who would latter free the slaves. You only choose to play these out or describe these in detail if you want. You could describe the battle because it was cool or some shit, and you could describe the rape because it was hot or some shit. There's no diference and honestly, the person you are trusting so much seems to know fuck all about universe development. You, just like him, are stuck on the stigma that sex is an exception and in someways inferior (even if subconsciously).

In sum, if you want to do actual world building you'll probably not be roleplaying, that's for certain. You are better off finding writters than roleplayers to help you on this.

>>54768

>Thread was going fine until someone called me out on my shitty opinions I give away as facts.

>>54771

>Implying that people are incapable of understanding the difference between blatant opinion, and fact.

Do I need to link you that Arthur video game about Opinion Vs. Fact, because only a child would mistake the two no matter how they're stated.

>>54771

I would argue character development has a huge impact on roleplaying. You experience from your adventure, learn things and reflect upon them. When faced against new challenges, new experiences, your character gradually changes.

But when sex is the focus, there's none of that. When I was trying to get into it, all I learned was 50 different words to describe a penis. There was no development, it was purely for sex.

>>54776

Once again, that's like saying sword fighting is bad because when sword fighting is the focus there is no gradual change of character.

Stop being so dense.

>>54773

>>Thread was going fine until dipshits stirred up shit because they can't comprehend the idea that their world development does fuck-all and develops nothing for their character besides 'muh setting' and that the idea of calling the shit we make for text-fucking as a 'world' is a backhand to the concept of crafting proper worlds.

Yup…

>>54810

But that's entirely different, anon. It's silly to compare combat in a roleplaying environment to ERP.

I'm not saying ERP is bad at all, I respect your decision to do it and I still both romanticise and admire the more serious ERPers. But the biggest different between combat in a roleplaying environment and ERP is that you're highly likely to have more character development and continual history outside of sword fighting… Rather than nothing but sword fighting.

I'm not trying to cause any arugments here, I'm just saying that Senfai (heh) raises some extremely valid points about both the state and motives for ERP for a lot of people, and looking back on a lot of these sites and threads that I've been lurking for the past few days I'm also seeing a lot more of a tool to use for masturbation than a hobby for genuine entertainment. I would most likely see much more passion for the role itself in a roleplaying environment.

>>54812

>Senfai

O-oh my Anon-kun~. You should be happy we don't have IDs, otherwise you'd be hounded like a dog for 'being a terrible RPer'.

To be blunt, I wish I liked this place more Anon, but from the name-fagging and general opposition of opinions, I think you can get my general tone for most of the userbase here. You're better off looking at more serious communities.

>>54820

Hehe, but I am a terrible RPer, give me a few months to learn things.

Is there anywhere in particular you'd suggest?

>>54580

I think part of the reason I can go for several hours is that I get much more than just a quick wank out of it. I get to enjoy things that are normally impossible to do. Then there's emotional validation and enjoyment that I get out of the kinds of scene I tend to do.

If I were to do more standard, in-out missionary scenes I would quickly get bored, and if I do not enjoy the scene enough I will end it much earlier than otherwise.

I guess it depends on what you're in the scene for.

In other news, Fai sounds like a conceited cunt. Hurr half of the posts in this thread are mine but I'm not a problem durr.

>>54820

>You should be happy we don't have IDs, otherwise you'd be hounded like a dog for 'being a terrible RPer'.

Identity politics are cancer. People's opinions should be judged by what they have to say, and not predetermined bias because of a name. In your case you choose to invite that for FSM knows why, but the lack of IDs means you have that choice at least.

>>54822

See, I know I'm conceited and a little cuntish. I just can't stand the pretentious.ess of calling the standard level ERP on here world building and character development. Saying its that just shits all over actual world building and character development and sullies the terms further than they already are.

I won't say Danalia is developed because in a few random long term things she acquired love for a pet and didn't slaughter it like a pig, because outside of that it's inconsequential. I won't call the world developed because I went into the politics and castes of the society. Its embellishing the setting so it can be whole. It is by no means reaches any sort of standard for anything proper. I'm not stupid enough to believe, to even insult the phrases to compare what petty, trite and lackadaisical bullshit I do for ERP to any sort of established world, or that it's creating a more concrete character. It isn't. And the idea that the standard /erp/er somehow thinks this is laughable.

>>54821

Not really. To be frank /erp/ is the first roleplaying community I came across outside of Chatango/MMORPGs, followed by F-list. And they're all piles of dicks. Strike out and form your own opinion and style, and give zero fucks about what the rest has to say. If you're enjoying it, that's all that matters. Just be capable of stepping back and examining exactly what it is you're doing.

>Inb4morechristianstigma

>>54812

> It's silly to compare combat in a roleplaying environment to ERP.

You should be able to tell me how they differ then. Action is action.

>But the biggest different between combat in a roleplaying environment and ERP is that you're highly likely to have more character development and continual history outside of sword fighting… Rather than nothing but sword fighting.

Again, I don't get this at all. How come? Better yet, I'll do it like you:

>But the biggest different between combat in a roleplaying environment and ERP is that you're highly likely to have more character development and continual history ouside of sex… Rather than nothing but sex.

>>54848

To be entirely frank most fight RPs I've done wanted a base level of'why are they fighting, why here, and is there any clear, moral and justifiable right?'

The amount of people who come up and bluntly go, "Please make me your bitch Goddess." With zero context outside of unadulterated lust kind of makes this point shine towards the anon you're responding to for me.

>>54848

It's just the context.

For the person sword fighting, this isn't the highlight of their journey. They've been traveling, they've been on an adventure to explore the world or save a friend. There have been trials and difficulties they've faced up to this point, and they've faced them head on (or even run away from them) before coming to this sword fight.

This may be their last fight, their life is in danger. There's questions of morality, there's questions of skill… There are limitless possibilities that exist and should the player survive they'll go on to encounter a variety of non combat experiences on their adventure. They may have lasting effects from the combat, such as being blinded, crippled or wounded.

What's the worst, long lasting development that sex would give? A cumshot to the eye, blinding them? No, there's no thought of what happens next, only the sex exists and only that is the primary focus of the entire encounter.

They won't be built upon outside getting fucked silly, once they put down those cocks they'll go back to being nonexistent until it's time to pick them up again.

When you assume a role, don't you assume all the flaws and traits of that character too? It's a separate entity to you - it doesn't think like you or act like you. But once sex is over, doing things only for the sake of sexual satisfaction, that role no longer exists. There is no bond between the avatar used and the person using it, it only exists as a cheap tool used to feel better. I hate myself for doing that and could never call it roleplay because it's not, it's cheap text fucking.

I know what you mean.

I basically want someone I can cyber with girls or people that I hope are girls and then chat about normal stuff after not sure if thats what /erp/ is for but its the closest board for it

>>56167

You know when you fuck a nigga and that nigga talks in long ass paragraphs, when really it's describing the other person's dick in 15 different languages

That's /erp/

>>56208

that sound super boring…plus I wouldnt be fucking something with a dick

>>56209

They also be like, taking in third person or some shit because "it ain't gay if I don't say I'm the one doing the sucking"

Niggas need to get a waifu

>>56210

I always say "its not gay if I dont KNOW they are a guy

But like for realsies I just want someone to fool around with and/or hangout with