/erp/ - Erotic Roleplay

>>56511

What friend?

>gets banned from flist

>keeps getting banned from flist

>despises the moderation

>thinks most of the people there are terrible

>yet keeps coming back with more and more alts

lol

>>56512

fai

you know, zeph, your friend who you defend

>>56510

To be blunt ol' chap, it was me. But I think the behavior itself is a little disparaging on Swiss Miss's side.

>>56514

>most people are terrible

>Somehow means all people

Logic

>>56515

Zeph? I haven't even messaged her on any of my alts. The fuck are you on about dipshit. The only people who generally know of my alts are on my goddamn steam.

>>56515

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YvAYIJSSZY

Paranoid much?

>>56516

Disparaging but in this case, quite effective! You've grown predictable, Fai.

>>56492

> implying anyone valid would take any claim seriously from here

>>56515

I have no clue who or what you're talking about. For the record, I've only used F-List to play in Ero-Empire when that was going on, so if you're accusing me of being someone from there, ha ha no.

>>56517

Nah, after two accounts and a month away from F-list because MUH AUTISM I just didn't feel like properly hiding it and made a horse-cock dominant dark elf. It wasn't exactly subtle. I'll go back to good ol' Lysetia formula of being a lithe demon hunter and giggle as the only people who come up are snuff addicts.

>>56510

if mods actually lurked on these boards there would probably be a lot more bans. mods only find shit out because some people keep reporting and snitching.

>>56521

All this griping and bullshittery. Saying mods banned an innocent user. Mass whiteknighting. And then it wound up legitimately being you anyway.

You really are maintaining that stature of top tier scumbag. How anyone is gullible enough to buy into your stories is amazing.

Everyone else? Hope you feel stupid you dumb fucks.

>>56522

>if mods actually lurked on these boards there would probably be a lot more bans

If no profiles are linked, there is nobody to ban.

https://www.f-list.net/c/serylis is the owner and/or overseer of https://fstatus.stormweyr.dk/ and had placed their profile at the top after some people worried whether or not mods knew of its existence.

>>56523

>Everyone else? Hope you feel stupid you dumb fucks.

The problem is not that it was Fai, but that all you have to do is accuse a user of being a banned user to get them banned for evasion just because they happen to jerk off to the same thing and were made recently.

>>56521

>I was only pretending!

>>56525

"The problem is not that it was Fai, but that all you have to do is accuse a user of being a banned user to get them banned for evasion just because they happen to jerk off to the same thing and were made recently."

Proof of this? Considering we have no way of knowing what kind of information on people and what they don't. That's a pretty bold statement right there.

>>56527

We have no proof. That's why the ban was scary: It looked like it could happen to anyone just for being called a Fai alt. Since we didn't see any of the behind the scenes info, it was shocking to us.

>>56528

I'm just saying don't present it as fact if you have no proof. At least, that's what it seemed like you were doing. I can totally understand that it's shocking considering we don't know. Either way they apparently had enough one way or another to actually hit the mark. Even Fai admits it was actually him.

>>56529

>apparently

Or they could have just hip fired and gotten lucky. That's just it - we don't know. For all we know, tons of similar profiles have been nuked and we only know this one because of happenstance.

>>56530

They could have. There's nothing that indicates that though. Which was why I was saying don't present the idea that they did as fact.

>>56532

There's also nothing that indicates they didn't, and the combination of the timing, the fact that we know they lurk this board, and the reputation they've established as childish shits with no professionalism is why it's something most people are getting paranoid about.

>>56533

some*, not most, yay trying to write two things at once.

>>56529

>>56527

>>56532

>Proof

You can't make another account from the same IP address you were banned from, and it's highly unlikely that they care enough to pinpoint the exact location of a banned user and mark it down for future reference.

Adding to that, numerous profiles have been, in the past and present, banned wrongly for evasion and allowed back after an appeal.

It has become so frequent that users are passing it off as a routine event and tell people to just file an appeal to say you have never been banned.

>>56533

Paranoid about it? Sure. But again, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm just saying that you shouldn't present it as fact. Because we have no way of verifying that it is. Are you at least going to admit that you shouldn't have done that, or are we going to go around in circles all night?

>>56535

I don't see why you couldn't. They'd probably just catch you if you did so though.

>>56536

There's nothing to admit, because I'm not the one who claimed it happened - I'm just commenting on why this thread has blown up as much as it has.

>>56537

How? Like >>56535 just said, they don't seem capable of reliably tracking that sort of thing.

>>56538

Ah, well. I guess that's the issue with anonymous posting. You replied to me after I replied to the guy who made that assertion and you seem to type in a similar manner. My bad there.

You don't think they have ways of linking accounts via IP? I dunno, that seems like a pretty basic thing.

>>56537

>I don't see why you couldn't

The same way bans from other sites work.

If you have a dynamic IP, you can get around them by restarting your router.

>>56539

>You replied to me after I replied to the guy who made that assertion and you seem to type in a similar manner. My bad there.

This proves the point entirely, sans IP visibility.

>>56538

Ah, well. I guess that's the issue with anonymous posting. You replied to me after I replied to the guy who made that assertion and you seem to type in a similar manner. My bad there.

You don't think they have ways of linking accounts via IP? I dunno, that seems like a pretty basic thing.

>>56540

No, no. I just meant that I don't see why you couldn't physically make another with the same IP address. Just that it'd probably be pretty simple to track someone down if they did. My bad there.

Anyway I'm gonna take off for the night. You guys have a good one.

>>56542

Fuuu double post.

>>56539

Not a problem, comes with the territory.

>You don't think they have ways of linking accounts via IP? I dunno, that seems like a pretty basic thing.

Oh they clearly do, because like >>56535 said you can't make another account from the same IP address as the initial banned account. But that's just the point - if you're evading in the first place, you're changing your IP address, which renders any tracking they have regarding that a moot point.

ya'll talking like you need IPs and shit to see when someone is blatantly another same person. People ban evade and get caught because they act like the same stupid shits and then throw up question marks about "how could they possibly know it's me?!?! They must be tracking me down and reading my notes!" Or, OR! You can change your IP as much as you want but if you still act like the same asshole someone is going to catch you.

Christ I find it hard to believe ya'll are this dumb or in this much denial.

>>56525

You are fighting pretty hard to support an already lost argument. You can't go "oh all you have to do is accuse a random user of being someone else to get them banned" when it was clearly a banned person. It wasn't some poor innocent user. This point may have held a pinch of water had Fai not been full of shit and the person was clearly a liar.

To give a little more insight into the IP situation - while I have no idea what F-List does or has as far as tools go, I can give examples based on how 8chan works to give you an idea of how far IP addresses go.

While we don't get to see IP addresses, Volunteers and Owners can see codes that correspond to each poster's IP - think ID codes used on boards like /v/, but persistent throughout the board rather than only being the same in one thread. In other words, I can see every post made by a specific poster on this board from that specific IP address by clicking a little link next to their name. In other words, I can tell you that

>>56349

>>56388

>>56390

>>56394

>>56396

>>56418

>>56422

>>56423

>>56427

>>56431

>>56443

>>56450

>>56456

>>56463

>>56465

>>56467

>>56471

>>56481

>>56500

>>56503

>>56508

>>56511

>>56515

in this thread are ALL Swissmiss. I can also point out other posts he made in other threads from the same IP address. Now, if he were to post from a different IP address, perhaps on a mobile phone or from school/work, I wouldn't be able to tell from the ID code if it was him or not (though in Swissmiss's case he makes it pretty obvious even without the IDs) For example:

>>56483

>>56490

>>56495

>>56496

>>56498

>>56501

>>56507

>>56527

>>56529

>>56532

>>56536

>>56537

>>56539

>>56542

>>56543

are all the same person, who (at least from this IP) has never posted anywhere else on the board. Now, it'd be silly to assume that this Anon only came to /erp/ today just to participate in this thread alone, so naturally one can assume he posted elsewhere on the board in the past, but if he did it was from another IP address and thus I can't see those posts as being from the same poster.

Make sense?

>>56553

Holy fuck Baron, I am dead. Thanks.

>>56551

The thing is, while Fai stands out like a sore thumb here, he doesn't on F-List - there are hundreds of players there who sound exactly like him.

>>56553

BTFO

TFOB

FOBT

OBTF

confirmed Swiss cheese confirmed full of holes.

>>56553

LOL

O

L

Holy fuck mods, just ban Fai already. All he ever does is be a condescending little bitch and stir up shitstorms. Everyone else here already hates him so just give him the freaking boot.

>>56562

FUCKING STOP POSTING FOR ME I WANT THIS ISSUE DEAD

>>56562

…Didn't the direct opposite of this happen today? Like, do you even logic?

>>56563

Swiss Miss, I just want to apologize for the amount of trouble this must be causing you. My bad.

Perhaps you shouldn't go searching for shit to stir?

>>56564

fuck, alright. Sorry for getting the alt banned. I really did not mean to do it but I thought lulz would be had

add me on steam quickly, I want to talk

>>56565

What's there to talk about? I fundamentally disagree with your behavior, even if it -was- me, it's not as if I was actively searching people out, nor back handing my roleplayers left and right as much as /erp/ likes to think the big ol' Fai Boogeyman does. Whilst I was breaking the rules and ban evading, you're essentially being a massive fucking cunt for no other reason than 'Lol this guy has a shitty opinion and is bit of a fucking twat and said a mean thing to me'. Get the hell over that, and quit being such an autistic, salty little shit over what some people said over the goddamn internet. It's the fucking internet. Have a little goddamn self-respect that your statements and arguments will handle themselves on their fucking own merit, and not have to samefag two different IPs and a secondary anon to back you the fuck up.

Christ. I feel like I'm kicking a puppy who just had all it's legs cut off. I need like, a shower or something now. Eurgh.

>>56562

Fai is an annoying attention whore who I think should go fuck off elsewhere, true - but he hasn't actually broken any rules, and for the most part his faggotry is confined to the F-List and complaining threads, and he doesn't shit up the important parts of the boards. If I banned him just for shit posting, I'd have to ban everyone who's ever replied to him and fanned the flames higher as well, because they're just as bad as him.

>>56569

>Whilst I was breaking the rules and ban evading

And this is why you've been banned again. Moving on? Moving on.

Can someone kill this thread please so we can get back to our regularly scheduled /erp/

>>56571

I've had the thread on auto sage since I found it - didn't delete it because I know that would just lead to someone posting it again or, worse, it leaking into other threads. The only reason this thread is still on Page 1 is because you're wasting time here instead of erping in other threads.

>>56570

Best Mod / 10. Thanks for not being a shitter, even if I am~. Plus. Our post per hour rate has skyrocketed from 0, to 4! We should be proud.

You're not supposed to respond to Fai.

>everyone and their fucking dumbshit mother responds to fai

You had one job, /erp/.