[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/erp/ - Erotic Roleplay

Here, we can all be the little girl

Catalog

The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
A message from @CodeMonkeyZ, 2ch lead developer: "How Hiroyuki Nishimura will sell 4chan data"
Advertise on this site
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
Verification *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 1444624874147.jpg (716.55 KB, 2000x1250, 8:5, 25h.jpg)

 No.56349[Last 50 Posts]

 No.56355

>>56349

>inb4 DELETE THIS


 No.56356

Neat idea, but nah.


 No.56357

>Age: 104

>Bi - No Males

why do these people think this behavior is acceptable?


 No.56364

>>56357

Typically it just means "don't call us, we'll call you."


 No.56373

>>56349

>Giving attention whores you hate attention

Seriously, stop being retarded. If you ignore Fai, eventually he'll get bored and look for other people he can pester to feed his ego. Posting about him only makes him more likely to stick around probably isn't even him, god knows every other bitchbreaker on that site sounds exactly the fucking same.


 No.56384

>>56364

DING DING DING


 No.56386

>Tfw this person's account has been banned.

Jesus fuck /erp/, do I need to link my actual account so you faglords don't witch hunt randoms?


 No.56388

>>56386

knock knock fam


 No.56389

>F-list staff is lurking /erp/ and banning random people

Comedy gold.

Someone pissed you off? Post their profile here and call them Fai.

Someone waited 5 more minutes before posting a response? Post their profile. Banned.

Someone's using a picture you want to use? You know the drill, Anon!


 No.56390

>>56389

No, their profile was a horse cocked bitchbreaker with maximum length preference


 No.56391

>>56390

>Concrete evidence for banning

>Someone's length and character

Jesus fuck Gestapo when.


 No.56392

>>56389

Jesus fuck, did they really ban this person because some shitter thought it was Fai?

F-List staff really are fucking stupid… Unless this is Fai, but… nah.


 No.56393

[2:24]Syia Revlari: I also messaged them, they typed and acted just like fai

[2:28]Syia Revlari: I posted fai's alt on 8chan

[2:28]Zephaala: Ah, I see.

[2:28]Syia Revlari: and she got banned

[2:28]Syia Revlari: no regrets

[2:31]Syia Revlari: I don't want fai here

[2:33]Zephaala: She wasn't in the room.

[2:33]Zephaala: All you had to do was not message her.

[2:34]Syia Revlari: she can't come back


 No.56394

>>56393

Dude don't post logs the snitch is around here!


 No.56395

>>56394

The logs were from the 8chan /erp/ room, and I don't think that posting room logs is a bannable offence.


 No.56396

>>56395

If they are public room logs they are fine to post.


 No.56398

>>56373

But I only hate Fai because I'm told to.

I didn't read the board rules but Its probably there right?


 No.56405

Nah Fai is just ridiculously obvious in how he evades. They have the stealth and subtly of a god damn elephant parade which is how they always get caught.


 No.56409

>>56405

Actually, the first two times I was caught solely on the fact that Maoyuu is a deceitful cunt. Like, I dunno bout you faggots. But to people I don't like and who I would actively seek to get banned from websites? I'm not nice to.


 No.56411

Okay, two things.

1) The fact that this profile was banned so quickly shows just how badly the mods want Fai to leave forever. I don't know exactly what they did but at this point it's become a witch hunt.

2) We're down yet another callous bitchbreaker profile. Is that such a bad thing?

If you're really looking for Fai then try searching for Always Dominant Herms with Vaginal Sex (Receiving) under No, and Multiple Paragraph post length requirement. If they're still a completionist for profiles that info will be unchanged.


 No.56412

>>56411

>being this cute


 No.56413

>now have the power to ban all bitchbreaker profiles I don't like on F-List

Thanks Fai, I will abuse this power to the fullest. Your sacrifice is well worth it.


 No.56414

Lol this thread is doubly terrible, dumb as fuck, and equally hilarious. Trying to theorize bans like Fai doesn't stick out like a sore thumb with the same shitty mannerisms every time they pop up.


 No.56415

The funniest part is all the asshurt people championing Fai in chat.


 No.56416

>>56415

It's not like I actually fuck around with.. well. Anyone from /erp/. You guys get really fuckin' pissy about statements on an imageboard. I'd understand if I actually pissed all over your cheerios during a roleplay, but 90% of you guys I haven't even touched, nor would I want to. Live n' let live. It's just kind of disappointing that Musclecunt is so petty over something I don't even remember saying to them. But then again, they delete whole characters over 'stalking' so. Uh. Yeah.


 No.56417

>>56416

lel didn't read. Fuck off Fai, everyone defending you is a cunt. The only thing more pathetic than you is people desperate enough to put up with you in exchange for some miserly lines of text from the Herm StinkyDick's Big Bad Textbook of Sex.


 No.56418

>>56417

stop making me look bad


 No.56420

>tfw you feel bad for senfai and you don't know why they warrant all this hate

Can't you guys just focus on having fun and keeping the teen girl drama/politics outside of this?


 No.56421

>>56418

>Namefagging

It's like you don't even understand why Fai is the issue he is.


 No.56422

>>56419

No I'm not, I'm just saying that people will think that you are me.

I (unintentionally) drive away fai


 No.56423

>>56421

I'm namefagging because I don't want this comrade to get hate


 No.56424

>>56420

There's such a laundry list at this point of reasons to dislike Fai. Sure I'd love to keep the drama out of it, but when their profile was perma-banned for angering the mod team, why are they still on F-List?


 No.56425

>>56423

Swissmiss I also have respect for you and hope that many erect penises come your way I'm the near future


 No.56426

>>56424

>angering the mod team

They got banned because some bored assholes kept spamming reports, so they decided it was easier to leave Fai banned.

Now, if you even suggest someone else may be Fai, they ban them for evasion.


 No.56427


 No.56428

>>56426

As I recall, Fai went to the mods and started accusing them of being incompetent after the last round of bans, turning a temp ban into a perma ban.

And thanks to Fai making alt accounts, they'll never unban Danalia. Congrats Fai, your craving for RP has ensured you'll never have that profile again.


 No.56429

>>56428

Maybe the mods were incompetent? Senfai could have had a reason


 No.56430

>>56429

Okay, let's say they had a reason. So why ban evade with alt accounts instead of just appealing the ban?


 No.56431

>>56429

"suck my putrid aids infected equine elf cock bitch"


 No.56432

>>56427

However I also wish that those penises are a horde of phantom floating penises and they take it in turns ravaging you. Then you become a slutbound prisoner to the floating phantom penis horde


 No.56433

>>56428

Fai would have boasted about that. But no, they got a warning for claiming mod incompetence in a private channel.

After bitching here Fai was mass reported.

>>56430

See >>56426

They ignored any and all appeals because it was easier to leave Fai banned than sift through reports.


 No.56434


 No.56435

>>56433

So they made alts. And those alts were banned. Now they've been blacklisted by mods, and instead of taking this as a hint to find a new site to RP on or just stop RPing altogether, they keep sticking around and now others are on a Fai hunt.


 No.56436

>>56428

Calling them incompetent? No. Bringing up -various- messages I got, various contradictory statements from other moderators, and after I point I was basically just going to Wonder Woman to get a straight answer from them and is probably the only non-terrible person on their staff.

The thing that got me banned was when they moderated my profile - mind you. There was a massive fit about an 'Autism' kink, where they read over my profile multiple times. Where they read through everything, and made certain that it passed their rules. I made sure of it. And it faced next-to-none changes over.. two months

>and then it got moderated again

Which spurred me to delete the majority of my OOC information, and go "Since this can't stop being moderated since the moderation team on this site doesn't seem to be capable of keeping a clear line on what is, and isn't against the rules after multiple questions - know this. Don't be stupid, dont' write two lines, don't etc etc etc."

Danalia's icon got killed after a month - which is when I started making my alts, after I went through Dave asking what could be done to revert this - because the messages that I missed from moderation (since I was at work) seemed as if they were willing to work with me, but me checking my notes at work sent them the message that I was ignoring their statements in chat - which was quite the opposite, since I wasn't there. I basically got an "Oh well, we don't want to bother. Sorry"


 No.56437

>>56436

You've just called them incompetent in this post, Fai. You didn't specifically say the word "incompetent", but you've heavily implied it at least three times just now.

Face it, you find them incompetent. You want to be unbanned, and you're making alts in the meantime.


 No.56438

>>56437

>but you've heavily implied it

If stating their actions makes them look incompetent, then maybe they are.


 No.56439

>>56437

I didn't call them fucking retarded until the end. I questioned why the fuck none of their shit made sense 90% of the time. Getting one moderator telling me that something is totally cool and fine, and if people didn't like it they should just ignore me - and then having another tell me that I'll be facing 24 hours because of it, is just nonsense. There is only one ban, that was for a week that I won't dispute - because it was entirely valid and I was being a bit of a cunt.


 No.56441

>>56436

>>56439

Oh, hi Senfai!


 No.56442

>>56441

Sup anon. 'Senfai' hits my ego in all the right ways~. How has your attempts to dive into the depraved world of.. world building, I suppose.


 No.56443

>>56442

both of you are bigger cancers than I am


 No.56444

Fai being an obvious raving cuntasuarus rex. Openly a shithead to everyone.

"Clearly everyone is at fault how dare they"


 No.56445

>>56439

How is it that out of everyone I've heard of on this site and F-List, you're the only one, literally the only one, who has problems with the mods?

Did you ever think it's not the mods, it's you?


 No.56446

>>56443

Nah. You're a cancer that actively ruins other people's enjoyment of a hobby for petty, trite bullshit and actively looks to make certain they're unable to.

I do hope you die of cancer. You're scummier than the goddamn hobo down the street who suckles dry those who pity him enough to toss cash and food his way.

Yes. I am a little mad.


 No.56447

>>56442

I couldn't find anything decent, Senfai, and just gave up instead


 No.56448

>>56446

And maybe this is why you've made yourself massively unwelcome on f-list, not people spam reporting you.


 No.56450

>>56446

go choke on a horse dick fai, you like them anyway

Where did you get all these ass patters in chat and thread, huh?


 No.56451

>>56445

It's a mix of both. Telling someone who has ranted insults at you for saying no to roleplay, with a 'Fuck off' and then getting chats with moderation about how I should have ignored them before saying those two foul words, makes me tear up.

I know when I'm in the wrong, but there's too many times where I've gone, "Wait a fucking second. That doesn't make sense."

>>56447

At least you'll always have lewd, brutal text-fucking and rutting, aye?


 No.56452

>>56451

I suppose, if nothing else it's lazy and enjoyable


 No.56453

>>56443

Considering you got someone banned who wasn't a Fai alt because you're too autistic to think about what the fuck you're doing? Nah, you're the cancer.

Also, if you don't like Fai, why the fuck are you looking for them and replying to them? Are you this fucking butthurt?


 No.56454

>>56447

Who are you? I've been wanting to set up a world for a while now.

>>56451

This is where you had a choice: Be abrasive to the mods OR not be abrasive any more. And it's clear what choice you made. I can't even agree with you saying "Fuck off" since they included the /ignore feature for that exact reason.


 No.56455

>>56454

I'm the creator of the lazy erp thread who wanted to abandon erp and get into conventional rp


 No.56456

>>56453

Can't diss the Swiss

fai should be better at hiding because mods told me they confirmed the kill


 No.56457

>>56453

Generally when one wants to white knight, they should make sure the one they're defending isn't wrong six ways from sunday


 No.56458

>>56453

Are you seriously stupid enough to think the mods don't do a background check before banning someone? Like REALLY?


 No.56459

>>56457

How the fuck was I white-knighting. I'm neutral about Fai, no strong feelings one way or the other. The fact that Swiss is trying to seek them out despite the fact that they hate Fai is autistic as fuck.


 No.56460

>>56454

I wasn't 'abrasive'. I went 'Wait, but they were hurling insults at me, and I don't get to respond back in any other manner than ignoring them?' "You could report them as well."

Maybe I'm just a dumb nigger, but that just seems a. extreme and b. annoyingly petty.

>>56456

I do wonder how they confirm it, besides reading through someone's notes, unless my VPN is just a pile of shit.

>>56457

I think at a certain point, it's about the principle of actively searching for someone to ruin their enjoyment of a hobby that's scummy and disappointing as fuck to look at. I may be fucking pathetic, wanking to horse-dicks and guro, but I can go 'Wow. I'm not a righteous fucking asshole who pisses on other people's parade's actively." Yah know?


 No.56461

>>56455

Sorry, I abandoned that after the Faiposting. If you're online, I'm in the /erp/ room right now.


 No.56462

I don't even get why this is being debated. It's pretty obvious by Fai's horrific demeanor that his ban is warranted. I've been on f-list for three years now and I've only gotten a poke for posting an ad in a channel it didn't belong. You just have to not be a raging shit machine 24 hours out of the day to avoid banning.


 No.56463

>>56459

Why are you dissing the Swiss? All she wants is the chat to not end up like Stiletto and Lace. Fai would have started cliques everywhere.


 No.56464

>>56460

You don't need any response beyond an ignore, you motherfucking idiot. You clearly weren't going to enjoy the RP, they were being shitheads to you, all you had to do was /ignore and move on, but no. You had to get that last word in didn't you?


 No.56465

>>56460

It's probably that your VPN gives it away easy, or you logged on wrong.

Anyway, gg fai


 No.56466

>>56463

I'm dissing them because they're acting like a fucking retard. If someone acts like an idiot, I'll call them an idiot.


 No.56467

>>56466

You don't have the right to call Swiss a retard because you are a Faidrone.

Don't diss.


 No.56468

Summary on Fai's bannation: "don't be an asshole," "I HAVE A RIGHT TO BE AN ASSHOLE!" "Ok but then you can't be on the site if you keep being an asshole." "FUK U LET ME DO WHAT I WANT, MUH FREEDOMS OF SPEECHES" "-banned-" "THESE INCOMPETENT DICKS BANNED ME BECAUSE REASONS"


 No.56469

>>56467

I'm neutral about Fai, never really spoken with them before. Dismissing someone by just going 'faidrone' with no evidence is dumb as fuck.


 No.56470

>>56463

>implying I even use any of the rooms outside of LFRP

>>56465

Nah, likely the two or three notes I sent to a few people making it obvious, I don't think theres anything against the mod team shuffling through your shit like that that in the terms. So.

Nah, gg implies you did anything good or worthwhile. You exemplified how low and debased you are, and I was just mostly interrupted in the middle of a decapitation scene that will likely be roared right back up when I bother making a new account :^).

>>56468

Muh freedom of consequences.


 No.56471

>>56470

I will personally make sure that you never see "Ye Olde" again.


 No.56477

>>56445

>How is it that out of everyone I've heard of on this site and F-List, you're the only one, literally the only one, who has problems with the mods?

Pretty sure there have been multiple posts here by people complaining about how F-List is run.


 No.56478

>>56463

>>56467

Swissmiss, stop pretending you have allies - at least Fai, for all his douchery, doesn't turn off his namefagging just to pretend he's someone else to back himself up

Post last edited at

 No.56479

>>56458

Not him, but everything I've heard about the F-List staff is that they're juvenile and petty idiots with the mentality of a middle school clique. Banning on impulse sounds perfectly in character.


 No.56480

>>56445

>you're the only one, literally the only one, who has problems with the mods?

Nah, I've disliked them since the website changed hands and took in paid moderators and employees.

They brag about banning everyone on their own channel and just sit around like a highschool clique.


 No.56481

>>56478

Wrong, why would I turn on my name in the first place?


 No.56483

>>56479

Then you're listening to the wrong people. Why on earth would an actual company allow a bunch of unpaid volunteers (Because that's what they are) free reign to abuse their powers and ruin their reputation by association?


 No.56484

>>56460

They can read your notes and PMs.


 No.56485

>>56484

I was under the impression that there was somewhere stated on the site that they are not capable of doing the latter. Strange.

>>56483

Because it's a pornsite that they have been, for a very long time now, -not- making money from.


 No.56489

>>56485

They're lying through their murring teeth.


 No.56490

>>56485

Doesn't matter. Their name is still attached to it. If they allowed their staff to abuse their powers with impunity it would ruin their reputation. No matter what way you spin it they have no motivation to do that. Alternatively, they do have a reason to make sure it doesn't happen.


 No.56491

>>56481

Because, like I said, you're pretending to have allies backing you up. Same reason you put your name on later despite being Anon when you started this thread. If you're going to be a namefag, own up to your actions and knock off the samefagging.


 No.56492

>>56485

>I was under the impression that there was somewhere stated on the site that they are not capable of doing the latter. Strange.

They're lying.

>>56490

>If they allowed their staff to abuse their powers with impunity it would ruin their reputation

I'm sure Fai's sob story is absolutely destroying their reputation.

Even if there were legitimate abuse, they can snuff it out and nobody would care due to people saying "why does it matter".


 No.56493

Hey, lazy erp person looking for normal RP. PM the snake in the /erp/ room in F-Chat, okay?

And Fai, sorry that you're banned but you might want to move on.


 No.56494

>>56490

They could feign ignorance, and lackadaisical management not wanting to bother to fix the issue is a very credible thing. Their hiring process is very 'Ehhh' for their volunteers, and as someone who manages a store the flagrancy of most of the things that I've heard - the things that I've seen through screen captures - nearly all of them would be fired underneath my jurisdiction in a heartbeat for being so godawful at customer service alone. But then again, I suppose my standards are high or some bullshit like that.

Wonder Woman is pretty great though. You know why? Instead of feeding me whatever drivel first dropped into her head, she said, "Let me check."

Five minutes later, she came back and gave me an answer after properly getting things in line with the other moderators.


 No.56495

>>56492

If people are stupid enough to believe him, sure. I have yet to be a part of a single community that didn't have at least a few crazies who were totally convinced the people running it were basically Hitler.


 No.56496

>>56494

And you know how their hiring process works how precisely? Or is this all based on "someone told me so it must be true"?


 No.56497

>>56496

They're transparent with it, and had it listed on their site before they hired barbarian?


 No.56498

>>56497

You mean the application form they have up or what happens past that? Because that's all I remember seeing. But then it could have been before my time on the site.


 No.56499

>>56495

Your sentence could be put towards anyone who was legitimately the victim of admin abuse.

Suggesting that claims of abuse would ruin their reputation while singlehandedly disproving that is silly.


 No.56500

I'm going to explain my reasoning for what happened.

I posted fai's alt as a joke because I thought the coincidence was too good to be true. I was not aware that it was actually Fai's profile.

Anyway, the sudden hostility and ass patting seems strange, as even people that I was on good terms with suddenly love Fai and think he is the best thing in the world. Something is going on and I will have to put on my tin foil hat. I'm leaving 8chan /erp/'s main chat and starting over on f-list. This is not an apology, but a explanation.


 No.56501

>>56499

Claims on their own? No. Generally speaking when you make a serious claim like someone is abusing their moderation powers you're expected to prove it. Especially when the people you're accusing have no reason to protect unpaid volunteers over their own reputation. Tl;dr I dislike this whole "oh yeah they're definitely right just because they said so" mentality that seems to be going around with a lot of people.


 No.56502

>>56500

nice dubs. Now bring your ass back, I thought the whole thing was pretty funny


 No.56503

>>56502

I'm serious, I can't trust you or /erp/ chat anymore.


 No.56504

>>56498

I thought they had quite a bit more where they outlined it rather decently and it left me scratching my head a little at it, but I may just be pulling it out of my ass at this point.


 No.56505

>>56503

You mean like how no one can trust you when you've very obviously tried to lie already in this very thread?


 No.56506

>>56500

You got a random user banned. It wasn't actually Fai. That's why the room was mad at you, Swiss.


 No.56507

>>56504

Well keep in mind. If it was up there way back when they recruited Barbarian it has probably changed since. That was several years ago after all. Especially since they're not run by "some guy" (Being Hexxy) anymore and are owned by an actual company.


 No.56508

>>56505

You mean that feeling betrayed is nothing?

>>56506

The mods determined that they were. I never reported them directly


 No.56509

>>56508

You know the mods watch /erp/ right? And since Fai's here, I'll ask: Hey Fai, was that profile yours?


 No.56510

>>56508

>You mean that feeling betrayed is nothing?

The fuck are you talking about? I'm talking about the fact that you pretended to be someone else and samefagged to defend yourself. That's fucking pathetic, and reason enough to never take anything you say seriously again.

>The mods determined that they were. I never reported them directly

We've already heard multiple times that the F-List moderation lurks this board, and probably banned on impulse the minute they saw the thread shouting I FOUND FAI GUYS.


 No.56511

>>56510

ok

sorry for your friend


 No.56512

>>56511

What friend?


 No.56514

>gets banned from flist

>keeps getting banned from flist

>despises the moderation

>thinks most of the people there are terrible

>yet keeps coming back with more and more alts

lol


 No.56515

>>56512

fai

you know, zeph, your friend who you defend


 No.56516

>>56510

To be blunt ol' chap, it was me. But I think the behavior itself is a little disparaging on Swiss Miss's side.

>>56514

>most people are terrible

>Somehow means all people

Logic

>>56515

Zeph? I haven't even messaged her on any of my alts. The fuck are you on about dipshit. The only people who generally know of my alts are on my goddamn steam.


 No.56517

>>56515

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YvAYIJSSZY

Paranoid much?

>>56516

Disparaging but in this case, quite effective! You've grown predictable, Fai.


 No.56518

File: 1444691682612.png (378.46 KB, 1664x1016, 208:127, Selection_028.png)

>>56515

Erm, that aint me, just saying.


 No.56519

>>56492

> implying anyone valid would take any claim seriously from here


 No.56520

>>56515

I have no clue who or what you're talking about. For the record, I've only used F-List to play in Ero-Empire when that was going on, so if you're accusing me of being someone from there, ha ha no.


 No.56521

>>56517

Nah, after two accounts and a month away from F-list because MUH AUTISM I just didn't feel like properly hiding it and made a horse-cock dominant dark elf. It wasn't exactly subtle. I'll go back to good ol' Lysetia formula of being a lithe demon hunter and giggle as the only people who come up are snuff addicts.


 No.56522

>>56510

if mods actually lurked on these boards there would probably be a lot more bans. mods only find shit out because some people keep reporting and snitching.


 No.56523

>>56521

All this griping and bullshittery. Saying mods banned an innocent user. Mass whiteknighting. And then it wound up legitimately being you anyway.

You really are maintaining that stature of top tier scumbag. How anyone is gullible enough to buy into your stories is amazing.

Everyone else? Hope you feel stupid you dumb fucks.


 No.56525

>>56522

>if mods actually lurked on these boards there would probably be a lot more bans

If no profiles are linked, there is nobody to ban.

https://www.f-list.net/c/serylis is the owner and/or overseer of https://fstatus.stormweyr.dk/ and had placed their profile at the top after some people worried whether or not mods knew of its existence.

>>56523

>Everyone else? Hope you feel stupid you dumb fucks.

The problem is not that it was Fai, but that all you have to do is accuse a user of being a banned user to get them banned for evasion just because they happen to jerk off to the same thing and were made recently.


 No.56526

>>56521

>I was only pretending!


 No.56527

>>56525

"The problem is not that it was Fai, but that all you have to do is accuse a user of being a banned user to get them banned for evasion just because they happen to jerk off to the same thing and were made recently."

Proof of this? Considering we have no way of knowing what kind of information on people and what they don't. That's a pretty bold statement right there.


 No.56528

>>56527

We have no proof. That's why the ban was scary: It looked like it could happen to anyone just for being called a Fai alt. Since we didn't see any of the behind the scenes info, it was shocking to us.


 No.56529

>>56528

I'm just saying don't present it as fact if you have no proof. At least, that's what it seemed like you were doing. I can totally understand that it's shocking considering we don't know. Either way they apparently had enough one way or another to actually hit the mark. Even Fai admits it was actually him.


 No.56530

>>56529

>apparently

Or they could have just hip fired and gotten lucky. That's just it - we don't know. For all we know, tons of similar profiles have been nuked and we only know this one because of happenstance.


 No.56532

>>56530

They could have. There's nothing that indicates that though. Which was why I was saying don't present the idea that they did as fact.


 No.56533

>>56532

There's also nothing that indicates they didn't, and the combination of the timing, the fact that we know they lurk this board, and the reputation they've established as childish shits with no professionalism is why it's something most people are getting paranoid about.


 No.56534

>>56533

some*, not most, yay trying to write two things at once.


 No.56535

>>56529

>>56527

>>56532

>Proof

You can't make another account from the same IP address you were banned from, and it's highly unlikely that they care enough to pinpoint the exact location of a banned user and mark it down for future reference.

Adding to that, numerous profiles have been, in the past and present, banned wrongly for evasion and allowed back after an appeal.

It has become so frequent that users are passing it off as a routine event and tell people to just file an appeal to say you have never been banned.


 No.56536

>>56533

Paranoid about it? Sure. But again, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm just saying that you shouldn't present it as fact. Because we have no way of verifying that it is. Are you at least going to admit that you shouldn't have done that, or are we going to go around in circles all night?


 No.56537

>>56535

I don't see why you couldn't. They'd probably just catch you if you did so though.


 No.56538

>>56536

There's nothing to admit, because I'm not the one who claimed it happened - I'm just commenting on why this thread has blown up as much as it has.

>>56537

How? Like >>56535 just said, they don't seem capable of reliably tracking that sort of thing.


 No.56539

>>56538

Ah, well. I guess that's the issue with anonymous posting. You replied to me after I replied to the guy who made that assertion and you seem to type in a similar manner. My bad there.

You don't think they have ways of linking accounts via IP? I dunno, that seems like a pretty basic thing.


 No.56540

>>56537

>I don't see why you couldn't

The same way bans from other sites work.

If you have a dynamic IP, you can get around them by restarting your router.


 No.56541

>>56539

>You replied to me after I replied to the guy who made that assertion and you seem to type in a similar manner. My bad there.

This proves the point entirely, sans IP visibility.


 No.56542

>>56538

Ah, well. I guess that's the issue with anonymous posting. You replied to me after I replied to the guy who made that assertion and you seem to type in a similar manner. My bad there.

You don't think they have ways of linking accounts via IP? I dunno, that seems like a pretty basic thing.

>>56540

No, no. I just meant that I don't see why you couldn't physically make another with the same IP address. Just that it'd probably be pretty simple to track someone down if they did. My bad there.

Anyway I'm gonna take off for the night. You guys have a good one.


 No.56543

>>56542

Fuuu double post.


 No.56544

>>56539

Not a problem, comes with the territory.

>You don't think they have ways of linking accounts via IP? I dunno, that seems like a pretty basic thing.

Oh they clearly do, because like >>56535 said you can't make another account from the same IP address as the initial banned account. But that's just the point - if you're evading in the first place, you're changing your IP address, which renders any tracking they have regarding that a moot point.


 No.56551

ya'll talking like you need IPs and shit to see when someone is blatantly another same person. People ban evade and get caught because they act like the same stupid shits and then throw up question marks about "how could they possibly know it's me?!?! They must be tracking me down and reading my notes!" Or, OR! You can change your IP as much as you want but if you still act like the same asshole someone is going to catch you.

Christ I find it hard to believe ya'll are this dumb or in this much denial.


 No.56552

>>56525

You are fighting pretty hard to support an already lost argument. You can't go "oh all you have to do is accuse a random user of being someone else to get them banned" when it was clearly a banned person. It wasn't some poor innocent user. This point may have held a pinch of water had Fai not been full of shit and the person was clearly a liar.


 No.56553

To give a little more insight into the IP situation - while I have no idea what F-List does or has as far as tools go, I can give examples based on how 8chan works to give you an idea of how far IP addresses go.

While we don't get to see IP addresses, Volunteers and Owners can see codes that correspond to each poster's IP - think ID codes used on boards like /v/, but persistent throughout the board rather than only being the same in one thread. In other words, I can see every post made by a specific poster on this board from that specific IP address by clicking a little link next to their name. In other words, I can tell you that

>>56349

>>56388

>>56390

>>56394

>>56396

>>56418

>>56422

>>56423

>>56427

>>56431

>>56443

>>56450

>>56456

>>56463

>>56465

>>56467

>>56471

>>56481

>>56500

>>56503

>>56508

>>56511

>>56515

in this thread are ALL Swissmiss. I can also point out other posts he made in other threads from the same IP address. Now, if he were to post from a different IP address, perhaps on a mobile phone or from school/work, I wouldn't be able to tell from the ID code if it was him or not (though in Swissmiss's case he makes it pretty obvious even without the IDs) For example:

>>56483

>>56490

>>56495

>>56496

>>56498

>>56501

>>56507

>>56527

>>56529

>>56532

>>56536

>>56537

>>56539

>>56542

>>56543

are all the same person, who (at least from this IP) has never posted anywhere else on the board. Now, it'd be silly to assume that this Anon only came to /erp/ today just to participate in this thread alone, so naturally one can assume he posted elsewhere on the board in the past, but if he did it was from another IP address and thus I can't see those posts as being from the same poster.

Make sense?


 No.56555

>>56553

Holy fuck Baron, I am dead. Thanks.


 No.56556

>>56551

The thing is, while Fai stands out like a sore thumb here, he doesn't on F-List - there are hundreds of players there who sound exactly like him.


 No.56557

>>56553

BTFO

TFOB

FOBT

OBTF

confirmed Swiss cheese confirmed full of holes.


 No.56558

>>56553

LOL

O

L


 No.56560

File: 1444698941401.jpg (46.66 KB, 1084x658, 542:329, 1433763669766.jpg)

>>56553

Holy shit


 No.56562

Holy fuck mods, just ban Fai already. All he ever does is be a condescending little bitch and stir up shitstorms. Everyone else here already hates him so just give him the freaking boot.


 No.56563

>>56562

FUCKING STOP POSTING FOR ME I WANT THIS ISSUE DEAD


 No.56564

>>56562

…Didn't the direct opposite of this happen today? Like, do you even logic?

>>56563

Swiss Miss, I just want to apologize for the amount of trouble this must be causing you. My bad.

Perhaps you shouldn't go searching for shit to stir?


 No.56565

>>56564

fuck, alright. Sorry for getting the alt banned. I really did not mean to do it but I thought lulz would be had

add me on steam quickly, I want to talk


 No.56569

>>56565

What's there to talk about? I fundamentally disagree with your behavior, even if it -was- me, it's not as if I was actively searching people out, nor back handing my roleplayers left and right as much as /erp/ likes to think the big ol' Fai Boogeyman does. Whilst I was breaking the rules and ban evading, you're essentially being a massive fucking cunt for no other reason than 'Lol this guy has a shitty opinion and is bit of a fucking twat and said a mean thing to me'. Get the hell over that, and quit being such an autistic, salty little shit over what some people said over the goddamn internet. It's the fucking internet. Have a little goddamn self-respect that your statements and arguments will handle themselves on their fucking own merit, and not have to samefag two different IPs and a secondary anon to back you the fuck up.

Christ. I feel like I'm kicking a puppy who just had all it's legs cut off. I need like, a shower or something now. Eurgh.


 No.56570

>>56562

Fai is an annoying attention whore who I think should go fuck off elsewhere, true - but he hasn't actually broken any rules, and for the most part his faggotry is confined to the F-List and complaining threads, and he doesn't shit up the important parts of the boards. If I banned him just for shit posting, I'd have to ban everyone who's ever replied to him and fanned the flames higher as well, because they're just as bad as him.


 No.56571

>>56569

>Whilst I was breaking the rules and ban evading

And this is why you've been banned again. Moving on? Moving on.

Can someone kill this thread please so we can get back to our regularly scheduled /erp/


 No.56574

>>56571

I've had the thread on auto sage since I found it - didn't delete it because I know that would just lead to someone posting it again or, worse, it leaking into other threads. The only reason this thread is still on Page 1 is because you're wasting time here instead of erping in other threads.


 No.56577

>>56570

Best Mod / 10. Thanks for not being a shitter, even if I am~. Plus. Our post per hour rate has skyrocketed from 0, to 4! We should be proud.


 No.56592

File: 1444704964580.jpg (126.07 KB, 650x650, 1:1, danagecontrol.jpg)


 No.56597

You're not supposed to respond to Fai.

>everyone and their fucking dumbshit mother responds to fai

You had one job, /erp/.


 No.56611

File: 1444719072190.gif (98.37 KB, 250x186, 125:93, 1331780610394.gif)

>>56349

>namefag thread

The cancer is real.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]