/fascist/ - Fascism

>>10

How do we go about spreading fascism?

>>17

Less talk, more action.The biggest thing I think we need is to have some sort of unified push in real life eventually. Internet stuff will always be important nowadays for spreading information and organizing, but if we want to spread the word to normalfags fascists will have to try to form a real movement eventually. A lot of my issue with the alt-right is that it is too focused online and making intellectual-type videos without seeking to do much in real life. It will have to be a populist-style movement like Trump did, but better and more revolutionary than that ever was. Most importantly, we have to show that fascism is more than a pejorative or it means taking away freedom for the sake of tyranny. We seek to build a new national community, end the atomized individualism and nihilism of today. I don't know if an American party should outright call itself fascist or whether that'd be political suicide out of the gate. I'm leaning towards no, but we should never change our beliefs for the sake of public opinion. Minds can be changed.

Another important thing a lot of people need do more is to not copy foreign ideas and symbols for their movement. We are Americans, we are not the Nazis of the 1930s and we shouldn't try to imitate them exclusively. Oswald Mosley once said "Fascism in essence is a national creed finding different national expression and method in each nation". We need a platform suited to the needs of the US in our situation. What that platform would entail would have to be thought of.

As a final thought I think we need to self-improve for reasons of health and presentation of fascist beliefs. Skellies and fat degenerates are both problems, though the latter is probably worse. Look how some of the people at Charlottesville looked. One doesn't have to be a body-builder, but at least be in shape for their own sake at the very least. Also blackpillers should be driven out of any movements or discussions. I can't find the quote by Giovanni Gentile once said "don't live life as it is, but rather how it ought to be". That is what fascists need to be doing. Sorry if this was ranty or not specific enough

>>18

>>17

One more thing is that there needs to be a serious debate between an ethnonationalistic approach or an ethnopluralist approach. Pragmatically speaking I'd lean towards the latter but debate needs to be had.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnopluralism

>>38

/pol/ nowadays is a lot of daily news about Trump, migration, Jewish tricks, etc while I want this board to be more focused more closely on fascism and third position politics. I want it to be more actual discussion and debate, but I don't want to discourage funposting and ban others just for having a different opinion like me on /pol/ currently. Some fascists like Salgado might just be instantly berated on /pol/ instead of actually being discussed, along with ideas like Strasserism, etc. I have no beef with /pol/ nor do I seek to replace it, though I do hope to grow this board in one way or another. To fill a certain niche, I guess

>>40

The niche is growing. There are more Fascists today than there were 20 years ago. That number is going to keep increasing. The current system of the world is stagnant and dying. Let it die. We will replace it with something much more grand.

>>57

I've seen a lot of mixed people online complain about that rootlessness feeling. I can't imagine how that feels. At least as a Euromutt I can feel a slight connection to a few different European countries, interest myself in the mythology of my distant ancestors, try to study their languages. It's no wonder the spawn of an already uprooted African and a Euromutt white produces such a prime target for the Jew, they're the (((ideal))) product of the judaized modernity

>>18

>Ethnopluralism

For what purpose? I don't want to rule over brown people and if we segregate into separate communities then what is to be gained in having some union in name only?

We must separate that much is clear so why not go all the way and focus on getting our own house in order unburdened by orcs.

>>17

Just three simple things: learn from mistakes, notice patterns that occur, and don't make those mistakes again.

>>51

There's one thing holding those people back, and it's the lousy state of their country. What if we repaired their society, gave them skills, cut aid money, reform their government, and ditch them never to speak with them again? It worked with Japan after they were nuked twice, why not those countries as well?

>>95

Blacks do want to rule themselves, and you can see their sentiment from how they want "more diversity" in white fields. They don't want diversity, just homogeneity because they can trust each other. That's why they like Black Panther more than Star Wars.

>>119

After all, it is only natural that a group will want to control its own destiny. The real question is how would this be presented to the public. Is it relevant for running in small public positions? Probably not. If a movement ever got large enough to be nation-wide, I would seriously start looking into communicating with black nationalist groups. Balkanization from above is the only type I see as plausible under current circumstances. People aren't going to want to up and leave the US and form some little white enclave while they are materially satisfied and have a job and food on the table. It'd just have to seem fair to both parties. Obviously the whites would end up with a majority of the current US outside of the South, but the blacks would have to be given a sizeable enough area, bordering the ocean and geographically contiguous. That along with expropriation WITH compensation for whites and blacks would make it an easier pill to swallow, not to mention a majority of people in this nation will and do admit that racial tensions will never die down. Their natural, we're different. Apart we can thrive amongst our own people. We don't have to be enemies with whatever state would be formed, a close relationship would be more valuable in fact.

>>122

I'm in agreement, provided that they're willing to handle their own issues. What I fear is that they might attribute their shortcomings to us, but I'm cool with it if that scenario won't happen at all.

>>125

I would hope that if a fascist government with a platform like I described ever got into power, media and education would work to undo the heavy victim narrative fed to both blacks and whites. Maybe that's iust too much idealism on my part, it very well could be

>>126

It definitely would be more effective than democracy. Democracy sounds good in theory, but ineffective in practice because countries are now repeatedly replaced by people who don't represent the native country. Whether people like to admit it or not, a hispanic illegal immigrant is going to have a different set of priorities than a white and black US citizen. Rather than fix the plethora of issues within whites (opiod crisis) and blacks (gang violence), liberals want to ignore it and pile additional issues that illegals have to secure more votes.

If you point this out to the left, then they panic and quickly try to shut down discussion by claiming that you're a heartless sociopath. That card won't work for long anymore though.

>>128

I want an end to the party game and a more technocratic, meritocratic form of government. I definitely believe democracy in the current form should be curtailed and changed to a form that will function better. In the past I've read about doing away with geographic representation for occupational franchise. Doctors vote for the issues of doctors, teachers for teachers, etc. It'd obviously be more complex than that, but getting rid of the obstruction and lobbying of our current system is essential. How many of the people who vote on our laws are actually experts in the field that a certain law concerns? Hitler was right when he spoke about the "Jewish-democratic blind worship of numbers", yet even he held referendums on public approval. Mosley proposed periodic referendums on the conduct of goverment as well. These quote by William Joyce and then Giovanni Gentile sum up my view:

>National Socialism will certainly smash the crumbling edifice of social democracy; and if dictatorship is the principle that a people should arm its chosen leaders with absolute power to express its will, it is a principle which must be upheld. If, on the other hand dictatorship is identified with tyranny or with the government of the people against their will, it is condemned on the ground that it violates the first principle of national unity.

>Nationalism and syndicalism–together with liberalism, itself–had criticized the old representative form of the liberal state and appealed to a system of organic representation to better capture the reality in which citizens are lodged, and would better represent their psychology and provide support for the development of their personality.

TL;DR: End to the party game, real representation, empower our leaders to act, no leadership shuffle every four to eight years. Sorry for rambling

>>129

That's my ideal system. Letting the experts decide as opposed to opinionated lobbyists who parrot the ill-informed views of journalists and celebrities. With regards to current firearm debate, it would be great for both sides. The anti-gun side would make sensible gun control laws from their experience and the pro-gun side would ardently defend it.

The current system only exists to fund corporate entities and Israel, it needs to be replaced at this point.

>>136

Spot on. I'm glad that you liked his excerpts as I've been too hooked with his book. Mason was an author ahead of his time.

Not really the place to put this, but Fascist Maxims (run by Cultured Thug) will have a livestream at 1pm PST / 4pm EST

>>179

I've been waiting for another one of these

>>180

I'm glad it seems to be starting up again. It had been a while since a Fascist Maxims was uploaded. Hopefully CT and Marshall Ironsides can get together for some more talks soon

>>133

>They're the reason why I went from a far-left feminist to right-wing fascist in the first place.

That's a great leap

t.ex-commie

>>350

What turned you from a commie into a fascist? It blows my mind that anyone would go from a reasonable model of how modern society operates (people acting in rational self-interest) to conspiracy theories about muh jewry based largely on feels over reals.

>>353

>What turned you from a commie into a fascist? It blows my mind that anyone would go from a reasonable model of how modern society operates (people acting in rational self-interest) to conspiracy theories about muh jewry based largely on feels over reals.

Go be a faggot somewhere else

>>358

I didn't see anything wrong with his question

Should fascism be a temporary inoculant against foreign infection or should it exist indefinitely as a system?

>>369

Permanent in an ideal situation. Representative democracy as we have it is inherently flawed anyway and I wouldn't want to return to it personally. I might be less authoritarian than some here though, and don't see an need for excessive militarization at all times or a total curtailment of democracy in many areas. I truly think society would truly be better off based on more collectivist, socialist and national lines.

>>353

Communism has been reduced to a mythology of lies. It is predicated on class struggle and a reductionist view of history that denies spiritual or traditional ties. Once you reject materialism you have to reject both capitalism and communism. Fascism offers a viable, regenerative alternative. Jews are a problem but they are over emphasised by Nazis. Capitalism merely accentuates their worst qualities as a race, as it does to whites.

>>369

Difficult to say. There is no doubt that a fascist country would be persecuted in the liberal world order unless it had a strong geopolitical strategy. If fascism was temporary corrective force it would lead to its degeneration. What is the great legacy of Salazar and Franco in the wake of their regimes? Fascism's aim is to ensure stability by rendering certain institutions not up for debate, it should be influenced by monarchism in this respect.

>>369

Fascism ought to be a permanent solution, or else lead to some unthought system that's even better than itself. Remember that fascism is not just a political philosophy, but it is a way of life. To quote Gentile, it's a cult of life, of strength, of youth, et cetera. Even when liberalism, democracy, and communism are eliminated and long gone, Fascism must hold itself up.

>>117

The reason the Japanese were able to rebound so quickly is because of superior genetics. Unfortunately for blacks, the genetic cards aren't stacked in their favor with regards to IQ. I think they can do well for themselves but generally only under strict white supervision.

One question for fascists: how do you deal with the fact that making a law against something doesn't stop it? I'm really into national socialism, I like the idea of a connected people who all work towards the good of everyone, but I can't think of a solution to this problem other than having some 1984 type surveillance state, which I don't particularly like.

>>502

We have laws against murder and even though they don't completely stop it they curb it. If you're talking about something petty like marijuana I have no problem with mj legalization since it would help stem the tide of spics/drug cartels flooding across our border.

>>503

So in your mind, the law discourages crimes that most people would agree are wrong (murder), and I'll assume that's because there's a punishment for it. But why is government the only entity that has authority to punish? Private police, who enforce "laws" that most people agree on would work just as well, even better in some cases.

I'm not a fascist myself but I'm curious about some of its tennets and ideals, so I have some questions.

Is fascism inherently racial or can it be properly applied on an international and multirracial stage?

If so, can there exist an international fascist community of allied countries or is it a "survival of the fittest" with the purpose of establishing a single nation as the most powerful?

Is there a unified or consistent form of fascism considered to be the right one or are there other fascist methodologies? If so, which do you find more fitting or interesting?

Sorry if these are too many, feel free to answer some or all of them or none at all, I also hope I don't come accross as oblivious or baity, I just like to have political discussions.

Is fascism inherently racial or can it be properly applied on an international and multirracial stage?

>Fascism doesn't have to be racial,look up integralism

If so, can there exist an international fascist community of allied countries or is it a "survival of the fittest" with the purpose of establishing a single nation as the most powerful?

>Nationalism is part of fascism,so this idea of internationalism is not very appealing to many of us since we all want to remain independent.Same reason why establishing a nation has the most powerful would create closeted hatred and division amongst nations

Is there a unified or consistent form of fascism considered to be the right one or are there other fascist methodologies? If so, which do you find more fitting or interesting?

>Fascism is always organic to the nation,its an expression of the people and culture in question,No two fascist movements are the same. Italian fascism,national socialism,Mosleyism are all very different even if they all have the same core tenant in mind(the nation above all)

>>536

Ah, I see. On that note, what is the general take on militarism? Is there a consolidated effort on keeping the nation on edge and on the verge of war? The speeches made by Mussolini and Hitler are often quoted as being all-encompassing proof that fascism leads inevitably to war and conflict, though I'm not so sure considering that the sociopolitical landscape of their time was murky and rife with turmoil and crisis, so I can't tell for sure if there is an active military component to fascism or if it was just a product of its time.

Also, it's good to have people here who have actual info to share rather than just go full retard and REEEE at everything, which is the thing that turns me away from /pol/, so thank you for answering.

>>540

>Also, it's good to have people here who have actual info to share rather than just go full retard and REEEE at everything, which is the thing that turns me away from /pol/, so thank you for answering.

I hate that shit too, I don't even use /pol/ anymore because of stuff like that.

>On that note, what is the general take on militarism? Is there a consolidated effort on keeping the nation on edge and on the verge of war?

Every fascist movement I can think of has been militant in one form or another, whether one thinks of the NSDAP's Sturmabteilung, the AIB's Greenshirts or the Italian Blackshirts. Now whether "keeping the nation on edge and on the verge of war" is a thing inherent to all types of fascism, I would disagree. While of course Hitler had imperialist motives in the East towards Poland and Russia, other movements didn't advocate for imperialistic policies. As a fascist, I would advocate in my country for the conscription of all males into the military for a certain period of time and have the system itself organized like the Swiss military. This is more for reasons of preparedness, sense of duty and fitness than gearing up for an imminent war. We wouldn't need to be in a war economy, nor stock-piling weapons.

>>504

A private entity with the authority to enforce laws would function no different to a government.

>>504

I really don't want to have my call to 911 ignored because I didn't subscribe to the blackwater Gold Package™️. Also what this anon said:

>>571

Are inflatable furries allowed under Fascism?

>>618

Keep your degeneracy in the house as long as it's legal. Under fascism there would be no more pride-parades and similar filth in public

Hello /fascist/s, young Traditionalist man here.

Other than differing methods on continuing leadership (I support hereditary leadership e.g. monarchy), how different are we, really?

We

>prioritize ethnic welfare

>push nationalist values

>welcome traditional/ethnic customs as expression of nationalism

>argue for class cooperation

>believe in hierarchy, opposed to egalitarianism in most forms

>One man rule

Was Stalin fascist?

I swear this is not a shitpost

>>641

I don't think so, I'm pretty sure fascism is the co-operation between state and corporation. When there's no co-operation then it's Capitalism. When there's no corporations then it's communist. Stalin's Russia had no corporations and is then communist by that (rather logical) definition.

>>542

>other movements didn't advocate for imperialistic policies

Spazio vitale?

>>641

No. He was a socially conservative authoritarian who appealed to Russian patriotism. The real question is are tankies crypto-Fascists?

>>95

And why would you sacrifice the integrity of the United States so you can appease the Blacks? Are you really willing to give up land, resources and infrastructure to a people who will most likely ruin it? The idea that ethnic groups could encounter one another without some sort of relationship of dominance and hegemony being established is not realistic and giving Blacks an ethnostate will ultimately result in a future war.

why is fascism better than monarchy? Transitions of power in fascism seem unstable

t. monarchist

>>704

I really only have a problem with the concept of heritable monarchies. If I had a say in choosing who would lead my country I would undoubtedly decide that the best and brightest of my country should be summoned to lead. Hereditary monarchy doesn't run on this meritocratic principle. If one king is extremely intelligent and competent in his leadership abilities, what guarantee is there that he will pass these qualities onto his son? Furthermore, I want equality of opportunity for all citizens, and a principle of hereditary descent in the leadership of the country would run contrary to this. All of this said, I would not be against an electoral monarchy, where the ruler will rule for life as long as long as they are of sound mind, etc. I can't foresee this being very much like a monarchy in aesthetics though, it would be closer to there being a president for life. How this monarch would be elected and by who, I do not know. I've had people tell me that hereditary monarchies are better because of shit like "muh symbol of the nation", but it never really wins me over.

>>705

The only reasons I prefer hereditary monarchy over fascism are that a ruler can train his successor well for a long time. He can die peacefully knowing that he didn't waste time training someone who wouldn't be a ruler. Stability of transition of power is the only thing keeping me from fascism. I like the idea of a true meritrocacy and the equality inherent in fascism. For as long as the leader is alive, a fascist government will be extremely stable and the people prosperous. My main question is: how are stable transitions of power ensured in fascism?

is religion a Jewish trick?

>>744

idk

>If one king is extremely intelligent and competent in his leadership abilities, what guarantee is there that he will pass these qualities onto his son?

Genetics. IQ is heritable, but high leadership competence still requires lifetime training,

which only hereditary monarchy can provide, according to history.

>Furthermore, I want equality of opportunity for all citizens

>wishing for equality of opportunity for leadership in a Fascist state

>i-it's not democracy guise!

You're running in circles. You don't want to have commoners vying for political power in an already unstable state driven with an ideology that hasn't lasted for more than one leader's lifetime; a race for power will destabilise the state as competing factions will abuse their power not for the good of the state, but simply to secure power. Just look at any democracies; even in public debates, political candidates can't just stop throwing crap at each other all the time even if all participants actually have made a good point on their own.

>I've had people tell me that hereditary monarchies are better because of shit like "muh symbol of the nation", but it never really wins me over.

It's merely a rhetorical point, but it works. If given the choice, would you have someone fearful or lovable as a leader with absolute power? Why do you think Hitler got into power?

Monarchs do have reason to be loved by the people, as they are linked to lineages of tribe chiefs who have consistent historical records of protecting the interests of the tribes. Unlike chiefdoms, monarchs have their responsibility on an entire nation, not just a single tribe.

>>744

I won't comment on Abrahamic religions, but I can say for sure that Paganism and religions of the East Asians are not Jewish tricks.

>>776

I meant to quote >>705

>>776

>>i-it's not democracy guise!

The reason the system I am talking about has more democratic elements is because I'm less of a fascist and more of a Strasserist. I don't see a completely undemocratic state as being desirable. Of course, I do mean an overturn of Western democracy in the form we have it today (e.g. I'd ban political parties and move to a form of occupational franchise, etc). If you can point out what exactly is wrong with the concept of meritocracy and equality of opportunity for all, I'd love to hear it.

how are you today?

Ok, I'm new with fascism so I have couple of questions. I love liberty in economy and personal liberty(freedom of speech, guns, private property etc.).

How does that work in fascism? In fascism you could not own weapons because of possibility of an civil war, you can not have full freedom of speech because you will be able to criticize the leader. So help me with this.

Also, maybe a dumb question but was Pinochet a fascist?

dwfe

>>890

PART 1/2

>Ok, I'm new with fascism so I have couple of questions. I love liberty in economy and personal liberty(freedom of speech, guns, private property etc.).

Do you mean private property in the sense of personal possessions or means of production and ownership of land? You’ll get different answers depending on who you ask. No one wants to mess with your personal possession, but answers will very in respect to private property. The NSDAP was fine with private property and actually went against the trend in the 1930s and reprivatized a variety of firms ranging from steel, mining, banking, local public utilities, shipyards, ship-lines, railways, etc. Granted, some of these were transferred to party-affiliated organizations, but it still was a form of private ownership. Strasserites, like myself, want to seize the means of production and abolish private ownership in land and natural resources, working within a national framework.

>In fascism you could not own weapons

“Fascism” is too vague here. The fascist movement of what country? As the leader of the British Union of Fascists said in his book “Fascism 100 Questions Asked and Answered:

>>…the German Movement also is known throughout the outside world as Fascist, which is the name commonly used to describe the phenomenon of the modern Movement whether in Britain, Germany or Italy. National Socialism and Fascism in my view are the same Movement, finding difference expressions in different countries in accord with different national and racial characteristics.

So even if one particular fascist movement happened to ban the possession of firearms to all citizens, it would not necessarily hold true elsewhere. Think of the diversity of views on race within some of the fascist movements in history. The Brazilian Integralists were nearly diametrically opposed in their stance on racial ideology of the NSDAP. We can speak of “fascism” in the abstract, a diverse movement with certain defining characteristics, but it will main abstract unless we are talking about a specific movement reflecting specific national conditions. Otto Strasser in his book “Germany Tomorrow” advocates for a system like the Swiss militia concept, quite the opposite of disarmament. I think many will agree with me when I say I am opposed to disarmament. Weapons to the people!

>because of possibility of an civil war

Ideally not, but in reality that might have to be dealt with. Fascism strives to create a truly popular (in the sense of “of the people”) national community, incorporating all elements of the nation within it. That’s what we mean when we say “totalitarian”. Fascism certainly strives for the total state, but that is not a bad thing in and of itself. If a group of people oppose a popular fascist movement it would be crushed and the insurrectionists dealt with.

>>890

Ignore my flag, I don’t know why I had the Gadsen Flag.

PART 2/2

>you can not have full freedom of speech because you will be able to criticize the leader. So help me with this.

I don’t think a cult of personality is a necessary component of fascism. I think it’s a mistake to needlessly glorify a man to god-like proportions. But, I do not see anything wrong with respecting the authority of a strong and proven leader. I really don’t know how speech-laws would be under any given fascist government, but I myself am adverse to needlessly restricting the “right” of free-speech to individuals. It’s not like you can really stop it anyway, especially in this day and age with the Internet. Now the press is a completely different matter. An independent press would still exist in my ideal system,as it does in many other fascist movements I am familiar with, such as Mosley’s. I ‘’would’’ restrict the freedom of the press though. It’s freedom to commit libel, be the mouthpiece of big capitalists and drag the nation through the mud at every chance it gets. That would end.

>Also, maybe a dumb question but was Pinochet a fascist?

I don’t know anything about Pinochet besides meme images so I’ll leave this for someone more qualified

I hope I did an okay job with my (lengthy) post. If you have any further questions or would like for me to try to clarify, I’d be happy to

Just how much wood could a woodchuck chuck, assuming, of course, a woodchuck could in fact chuck wood.

And what does the woodchuck hope to accomplish by the chucking of wood? Is this for the good of their fellow woodchucks, or a private enterprise?

Where exactly does woodchucking fit into Gentile's teachings?

What does it even mean to "chuck"? Is it physical? Mental? Spiritual?

Is the toil of the woodchuck to chuck merely a deceptive concept of the jews?

Or do the jews chuck wood, and are keeping the woodchuck from chucking, thus the hypothetical nature of the question?

As third positionists, I feel our volk would be better served having answered this question if we are to move forward.

Does anyone know how to rip audio from audible? I want to post Magicians of the God's and Rise and Fall of the Third Reich

>>1056

You can record your own version of any audio file by using Audacity (a free program) to record audio from your computer's sound system and then save it as an mp3. The only downside is that you have to let the entire audio play while you record.

>>18

I say that when action is taken, be aware of where you are and how/if it can grow there. Some areas will have close to zero potential recruits or sympathizers while others may be more receptive. I don’t call for PR cucking but just strategy in doing this. Vermont and Maine for instance are two pretty similar states. But one just experienced a mob killing by Somalians very very fucking far from where they really belong. Gotta capitalize on the anger. Growth before the inevitable confrontation.

Also in general I’m actually pretty anxious about adopting the name fascist. I know it’s a real term but it’s been butchered to hell and people use it like a swear word in the West. You’d see people who you think were nominally on your side or even close to being swayed made instant enemies when you tell them ‘I’m a fascist.’ It has unamerican connotations whether accurate or not. Like what dilbertman Scott Adams said in this election about how truth itself doesn’t matter to the masses only persuasions do. Even if you called the movement the ‘kill a commie movement’ some astute normalfags might guess who that makes you, but if hating communism is what is accepted then they won’t mind acting like fascists while not being called them. Lead them to us without triggering them I guess. I hope people lose the ingrained fear of certain terms but I’m not holding out for that.

>>1276

>Discussing any kind of fascist leader that isn't Hitler

Also if you discuss any fascist ideologies that aren't natsoc you get called a shill and people screaming NATSOC IS THE ONLY WAY.

With that said, I don't have a problem with real, genuine natsocs and this post isn't meant to attack them. It's meant to attack retards who like to use the label without reading any actual natsoc theory.

>>1346

The issue i have with Natsocs is that they think they have the solution to everything. They think that a system developed in Germany would work fine in a place like the United States.

>>1346

I have a feeling a lot of them are just into it for the edge-factor plus the National Socialist aesthetic. I wonder how many of them have never read Mein Kampf. It’s a shame it’s so long

>>1352

I can’t either, they knew their fashion well.

>>1348

This. There are people who think we should use Mein Kampf as an instruction manual and the Third Reich as a model. While of course there were many good things about the Third Reich and have incorporated bits and parts of Hitler’s thought into my own, I can think of negative things as well. Especially with the US the difference between 1920s/1930s Germany is massive. The US is many times larger, ethnically diverse and pretty different culturally. I don’t think the NatSoc path would work at all. Hell, an honest discussion needs to be had whether American fascists should be pursuing a more Integralist-like route or not, I think

>>1358

We need to develop "American" Fascism.

>>1359

My name was OP this whole time? Ugh.

>>544

That's what George Lincoln Rockwell advocated as well. Frankly it makes the most sense.

It boils down to one of two things

1. They stay on the reservations

2. They self-deport, and we incentivize this process

It would behoove any fascist movement to look into reservations for ethnic groups, i.e. Native Americans and learn from mistakes there. I do genuinely feel for Native Americans on Reservations. With more guidance as opposed to a more open way of organizing society they could prosper and leave both of our peoples well and better off.

>>1400

>feelz for dirty injuns

Anon, you do realize that the injuns forced onto the reserverations, were the ones that were violent rapists, murderers, and thieves, yes? All the decent tribes simply assimilated or were relatively left alone and joined the Union.

>>1414

Right. At the same time. I don't want them to live in squalor. I'd like for any group of people to be prosperous in their own right without interfering with my nation. I will confess that my opinion on the matter is colored by my experiences with them. I'm not blind to how barbaric they were before Manifest Destiny and I wouldn't have that changed.

Are white nationalists welcomed by fascists? I’m getting the feeling that a lot anons here are against the racial elements. If you are, then explain why?

i am new here do threads here even die ? i have seen some that have been active for almost a week

>>1481

I have it set to have something like fifteen pages of threads. I don't think we've even got more than ten at this point.

>>1485

ah i see thank you

Thinking about becoming a libertarian or an cap.

So how many brain cells do i have to lose to accomplish this? How do i get permanent brain damage?

Is there any know way of developing autism or aspergers?

>>1507

uh, what?

>>1529

taxation is literally the same has slavery

jesus its working already,thanks.

What is "iron guard"?, is this a fascist movement?

>>1655

yes it is Romanian fascism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Guard

>>1655

Read "For My Legionaries". It was a religious fascist group lead by the great Corneliu Zelea Codreanu. There should be a copy in the literature thread

>>1532

No problem anon!

>>1693

>>1701

Thanks

>>1771

Probably because they typically believe in something retarded like horseshoe theory and think both extremes are the same.

>hurr stop thinking about collectives bro! Start thinking about individuals! You both want a degree of authority and big gubmint, evil!

>>1771

Because to many of them, any government with social programs is socialism/communism.

>>525

Nope. Before Hitler made Mussolini his bitch Italian fascism wasn't racist or antisemitic. I consider my personal beliefs to be a synthesis of various political ideologies, with a little bit of fascism thrown in. It's possible to be super liberal on social issues while supporting fascist economics.

>>1804

You first, /pol/tard.

>>1820

Many are disillusioned with Christianity due to the current cucked nature of the church. They mistake the current state of the church with how it originally was "i partially blame Varg" I'm not a Christian myself but i understand that earlier Christianity was definitely part of the European spirit, and i wish my fellow fascists who are Christians the best of luck in fixing the church alongside our broken society.

>>1824

>>1829

It really blackpills the fuck out of me, dedicating so many years to a cause only to end up hated. Hated by meta cult lemmings, hated by Christian's in the church and now hated by the only thing giving me drive. Its isolating. Do you think theres any future for Christians inside fascism?

>>1832

outside of the ultra-orthodox legionnaire movement I honestly don't think so, unless you follow the "positive christianity" thing that the nsdap cooked up

>>1811

>Mussolini didn't just appeal to racists whenever he felt like it

>Mussolini meant biological race rather than a cultural entity that assimilated other groups

>linking Atomwaffen unironically

Please kill yourself.

>>1843

>outright states that race has no biological basis

>g-guys he was talking about biological race, not culture

>despite Mussolini stating that Italians' ability to assimilate other ethnic groups is part of why they were so strong

>>1850

Mussolini couldn't use race as a uniting factor because of the disparity between North Italy and South Italy, as well as the colonies in Africa. It was easy for natsocs to focus on the racial aspect more because there was no disparity in Germany (unless you want to count Bavarians as swarthy Germans) and they didn't have any colonies left. What Mussolini said in public doesn't reflect what he actually thinks, the same thing with Hitler.

>>1832

I think you're inflating the number of anons that hate christians. I lean heavily towards paganism but I wouldn't think to drive away christian comrades because of pettiness like that. The problem comes in when christians try to constantly proselytize people away from their native faith and traditions, but chances are if you're fascist you wouldn't approve of that anyway I hope

I've noticed my views are a mix of Falange and Carlist thought but I'm ancestrally Scots-Irish. is there a flag that even fits me?

>>1919

probably BUF

>>1879

>i-it's just propaganda!

Yeah, no. Calling bullshit.

>>1935

So how do you justify the Italian racial laws? did Hitler force Mussolini to be racist? was your hero so weak and ineffectual that he was just a Nazi stooge at the end? that's absolutely hilarious, especially considering people like to meme that Mussolini hated Germans.

>>1921

yeah but weren't they Corporatist not Syndicalist

>>1948

Mussolini sucked up to Hitler, simple as THAT. The racial laws were unpopular at the time and opposed by such people as Italo Balbo.

Fascism has no need for racism or antisemitism or other conspiracy theorist nonsense. All that is necessary is a national rebirth. Such a revolution could assimilate minorities into the nation. Take your ramblings about niggers and kikes elsewhere.

what is national syndicalism if it uses a market socialist economy?

>>484

no doubt. wait until they hear about Kai Murros

>>2098

>da joos

Neck yourself you retarded stormfag

>>2191

>da joos

Nice refutation. While I don't think Jews are a hivemind or are omnipotent, the JQ is absolutely a real thing.

>>2202

>>2225

Lmao, citing antisemites isn't proof, you fucking retard. There is no "Jewish question." Most of the Jews of Europe were assimilated before World War II. Shitler uprooted the Jews that had been assimilated and wrecked everything. German Jews fought in equal numbers to ethnic Germans for the German Empire in World War I. You are fools and buffoons.

>>2227

No

>>2227

>citing antisemites isn't proof, you fucking retard

I'll translate this for you

<stop citing people on your side of the argument!!1!

Of fucking course me and other people will cite antisemites when making antisemitic arguments

>There is no Jewish question

I laughed at this. The JQ is still very much a thing, though not in the exact form that it was in in the early 20th century. Also before you strawman me to death, there is no cabal of Jewish overlords ruling the world so sorry you can't use that on me :^)

>>2227

Literally everything you just said is completely wrong. Also nice job on only mentioning "muh ebil Hitler" i doubt you even know who the other people i posted are.

You're in the wrong place bucko, here are some boards that might be more to your liking.

https://8ch.net/pol/index.html

https://8ch.net/leftypol/index.html

https://8ch.net/soyboys/catalog.html

>>2234

I kinda hope he stays so we can watch him autistically screech for a while.

>>2379

He is giving free funs (guns) to the people, that already makes him 10/10 on my book.

>t. /k/ aficionado.

>>2379

I like him a lot.

Hey anon, why aren't you registered on fascistforge.org yet?

>>51

>Doesnt know what to do with negroeswhat is a caste system?you could devide into aristocracy, bourguise, workers and slaves/negroesYou do understand that they are basicly less developed "humans".

>>51

(sorry for the odd format, I hope this will be better)

>Doesnt know what to do with negroes

what is a caste system?

you could devide into aristocracy, bourguise, workers and slaves/negroes

You do understand that they are basicly less developed "humans".

What are your thoughts on videogames?

>>2815

Nothing wrong with them if played in moderation

>>2815

This: >>2817

>>2820

I don't know why or how /pol/ has degenerated so much, but it's part of the reason why this board exists now. As long as someone isn't pouring their entire life into staring at a screen, it's fine on my watch. I watch an episode or two of anime every night before I go to bed, but I don't make it my life like otaku degenerates or people who go "I'M A GAYMER".

>>2821

Cool then.

>>2820

really it's the US elections that brought in all of these no fun allowed spergs and boomers to /pol/, but as those other anons said, there's nothing wrong with sticking in good ol' earthbound or chrono trigger into your snes or watching fist of the north star or jojo once in a while

In your opinion, has fascism ever seen a positive implementation?

>>2839

given that franco's regime lasted about 40 years or so I'd say yes

>>2839

Franco gave us a huge industry boost and free healthcare.

t. Spaniard.

>>2873

I don't know about Itoi's political beliefs/ventures but Mother 3 felt more like anti-American consumerism, a lot of Japs feel that way about ZOG

Not really related but I'll ask anyway What's this board's view on TRS/Peinovich

>>177

that reminds some German bitch called me "white trash" which disingenuous because often times you get really bright people in bad situations (like myself, living on the skids with a high verbal IQ)

>>3049

Degenerate, fat LARPing kike

>>2838

Exactly even if I'm a U.S. citizen, pol did get pretty toxic after awhile

>>1832

I modified my beliefs to fit a more Ungern influenced Marcionism after awhile.

>>3102

>Toxic.

Don't use that word, you sound like a fag whenever you use it. Just say that /pol/ got pozzed.

>>3516

When it comes to economics, there isn't a clear consensus, some fascists are more socialists than others, others are more capitalistic than others. You have to remember that fascism is more of a philosophy and a way of life more than just a economic theory.

You should check this video to know more:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=LDTkA7vDZiM&t=5s&bpctr=1530936427

Is it true that /soyboys/ was created and is populated mostly by /fascist/s?

>>10

why is there no flag for argie fascists

>>3884

furthermore, if Ustase gets a flag, Chetniks do too.

>>3335

sure thing. I don't like using it but I think I posted that, don't remember.

Who is the actual "Far Right"?

So given that we have to explain to outsiders that Fascism is a Third Position ideology, therefore not Far Left or Far Right, which political ideology should be considered as such inside of the political spectrum?

From my perspective it should be Anarcho-Capitalism. Here is what could convince the masses:

>It diametrically opposes the Far Left (Socialists/Communists and Anarcho-Communists)

>The concept of Physical Removal as explained by Hans Hermann Hoppe in "Democracy: The God that failed"

>Disdain towards the poor in the late stages of (((Murray Rothbard's))) career

>Fetishism towards Pinochet's Regime in Chile by it's followers

>Unapologetic about discrimination when inside private property

>It embraces inequality among people

Pointing to AnCaps (at least from my point of view) would be beneficial for us, since redirecting the attention towards a different group would allow us to operate in a more relaxed manner meanwhile the hordes occupy themselves with their new toy. It is also pretty convenient given the already generalized discontent with Capitalism among certain younger people.

Once again, this is just my personal vision as a former Libertarian, feel free to propose other options, expand on what is already exposed and discuss any errors.

>>4019

This might be worthy of its own thread tbh

>>3898

and russian fascism would deserve one

>>4156

also their view of the irish in general

>>4019

>It embraces inequality among people

Isn't that also part of fascism?

>>4285

>Excuse me, while I was looking for the Codex Fascismo in interest of buying it, I saw that there was multiple parts/volumes. I saw parts 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in three volumes readily available online, but it makes me wonder if there is a part 1 of Codex Fascismo? It's something I might be missing because I can't any indication from H.R Morgan that there is a part 1 anywhere at all. Morgan seems elusive to me as he doesn't have an online presence

I own all three volumes. As far as I know there are only three books available. I was pretty disappointed with Morgan’s work tbh. Lots of spelling errors in his books and especially in the green volume (can’t remember the name) lots of his “translations” (which he seemed to have done himself without training the in the languages) are very clunky and hard to understand, some stuff is literally translated where it sounds wrong in English, etc. I kinda regretted spending so much on all three volumes honestly.

>>4285

I think the terms "right" and "left", are pretty much useless because people are always gonna strive for something that they think is true not giving a shit if it's right or left, for example you have libertarians (right wing) but that advocate for open borders (left wing).

>>4286

Do you recommend an alternative? Should I just get parts 2 and 3?

>>4287

Agreed.

>>4068

of course. btw, how do I contact the BO?

>>4338

>>>/fascist/1

Unironically being a facist is the most cringeworthy political position possible. Infinitely worse than even anarcho-primitivism. My question to you is this: How often do you cuddle your pillow like the girlfriend you wish the state would provide for you?

>>4472

nah I just use your mother and then throw her in the dumpster after dosing her. works every time.

I don't know much about Italian Fascism at all. Would anyone be willing to explain the main differences between it and National Socialism?

>>4583

Others may be able to give you a more in depth answer, but definitely give pdf related a read for some information by the so-called “philosopher of fascism” himself, if you haven’t

>>>/fascist/58

>>4585

Thank you. I will read it. I asked this question mainly because someone asked me about it the other day and I really didn't know enough about it to answer the question. I know that Hitler was inspired by Mussolini and Italian Fascism to a certain degree, but also that the two ended up having somewhat negative opinions of one another. I also know that before WWII Mussolini tried to ally with the British and the French to contain Germany but that it fell appart with the Italian invasion of Abyssinia.

I am also curious about how much of Italian Fascism is Mussolini and how much is from others. From my admittedly non-Italian perspective Mussolini comes across as something of a buffoon, although this is surely partially due to Allied propaganda.

Which Mein Kampf English translation is the least jew infected?

>>4719

Stalag is the best but honestly even the most commonly available version in the US (translated by the kike Manheim) is basically the same as the Stalag. Stalag is much easier to read, imo.

>2018

>not learning German to read Hitler’s original words

>>4729

>What about past degeneracy in ones life before becoming a Fascist? Or what if said past degeneracy becomes public through tabloids once one becomes involved with a fascist movement?

How bad was what you did? Was it on film or is there proof that you did it? I've done tons of stupid and weird shit but there's nothing obviously linking anything to me or provable

>>4735

>and my face shows in some of them

>a hot girl who had a fem-dom fetish who took pictures of it

Do you think any of them kept the photos? Honestly you shouldn't go into politics without anticipating that every obscure thing thing you've ever done in life will be dug up and thrown at you, especially if you get any recognition in the media. Would those photos coming out be career destroying? It depends how easily embarrassed you are and how willing you are to brush it off and not let it bother you. Just be glad you were doing nothing super fucked up (by normalfag standards). I'd be more worried with the femdom thing. Was your face in that? I guess I'd say if you have the balls to go into politics, be ready and expect it. Don't be a hypocrite only to get exposed

>>4758

>My only hope would be that none of these people had kept any of the material over the years or deleted it because some of their partners found it.

This is the most likely situation, honestly. And whether you decide to go in or not will have to be your choice. Personally speaking I’ve done worse stuff than what you’re describing degeneracy-wise but luckily I’d always made a concious decision to refrain from showing my face. But hey, we all make dumb decisions when we’re teens. If I had a time machine I’d change nearly everything I’ve done in my life since I turned 14 or so. I’m not going to let my past drag me down though, even though there’s still a possibility of it one day surfacing if I do go into politics. All this said, if it did ever happen to me I’d claim the images are fake and photoshopped. With stuff like deepfakes existing nowadays you can cast a lot more doubt on these images.

>>4758

Anon, this might sound weird, but you should have been a gimp. That way, people wouldn't recognise your face because of the mask. Ironically, getting deeper would have helped you in the future. Really makes you think.

What is fascism?

>>5143

Cultured Thug is one of my favorite Youtubers. He was probably the guy who made me snap out of my edgy /pol/ LARP phase and begin to take fascism seriously and really dive into the reading. I like how he's so knowledgeable and how this truly shows in his Discord AMAs. I also appreciate how down to Earth he is and open to questions / disagreements. Marshall Ironsides isn't bad but I don't like him nearly as much. His videos are kinda corny (at least imo) and I can never forget the fact that he is an unironic Freemason. I did like his and Thug's Fascist Maxims podcast though, I hope they get back together again soon

>>5149

I was beginning to wonder if they were ever going to do another Maxims vid

I agree with you on both of them, I got into Cultured thug after I watched his discussion with Stefan, and showed me a brand new world with literature.

Ironside's book though, it's a passionate read, really dives into the marxist and the fash

>>5154

What's his book called? I thought I heard he was writing one a long time go, I didn't know it had came out

How would using a trip code be received on this board?

>>5654

Nothing wrong with a good beard. I personally don't like facial hair on myself, but don't let the hipsters and soyboys ruin them for you

>>5658

Thanks friend

Does anyone know a website that sells all kinds of flags ? i want to collect all the fascist/third positionist flags i know the NBU sells British fascist flags but that is all they sell

God i fucking hate Ben Shapiro,that guy is such a dirty little weazel.

Literally everybody from left to right has good reasons to hate him,the way he talks about the poor like they are some drag on society,the way he has no problems shilling for israel and government spending on his neo con bullshit but healthcare to him is basicallt slavery.

>>5805

Just a little jew full of contradictions

Anyone has that picture comparing real National Socialism to Siege"culture"?

>>5805

I recently had a friend of mine casually drop the fact that he listens to Shapiro while on breaks. Lost a bit for respect for him there

Is anyone worried that we're so deep into leftism and so free about Marxist discussion that there might be /leftypol/ infiltration? And what will become of this board in the future if things remain as is? Will we ever turn our backs on fascism? Oh, and one last question. Is the environment here too hostile to National Socialists?

>>5857

>>5866

Kek i know,because being "forced to pay" for healthcare is abuse but nobody should have the option to refuse to pay billions of dollars in taxes for israel

>>5919

>Is anyone worried that we're so deep into leftism and so free about Marxist discussion that there might be /leftypol/ infiltration? And what will become of this board in the future if things remain as is?

Not just Lefty pol but also the Siege Fags and Atomwaffen.I am guessing decline.

> Oh, and one last question. Is the environment here too hostile to National Socialists?

No,they can come here and argue with any of us anytime,people only are sometimes hostile because they are usually horrible posters and are the quickest ones to jump into insults and ad hominems.

>>5919

>Is the environment here too hostile to National Socialists?

I don’t think NatSocs are the predominate force here, but everytime someone has been asked to explain their hostility to NatSocs they are almost always referring to /pol/ retards who know nothing about the ideology they profess. Hell, the reading thread is reading NatSoc literature by Gottfried Feder right now

Stupid question but Sargon of Akkad Paul Josef Watson and count dankula should i keep them or just unsubscribe from them they are libertarians but they do give good news on the reality that is going on in Europe and the world

>>6004

Unsubscribe them. Find people better like the Iconoclast.

Is there any relation with IronMarch and this /board/?

>>6061

Like officially? Nope, but there have been a few IronMarch threads

What happened to a board? Did it get hacked or nothing?

>>6357

>>>/3rdpol/1

Once you get your ideal fascist government, how do you ensure that it does not become corrupt and bureaucratic? And if it does, how do you fix that outside of a violent revolution which would invariably cost lives and destroy the economy?

>>6417

Failure of execution of duties would mean death, short of extremely extenuating circumstances. Same way the English become kings of the sea, essentially, admirals who failed their given missions were executed on return, hence why "The captain goes down with the ship" exists.

>>5632

Nietzsche writes about it in Genealogy of Morals and The Anti-Christ.

Why is defending figures like Pol Pot a sore subject for the entire political spectrum?

Also why are Turks bullied by both the left and right when the female-heavy Kurds are supported so much considering women aren't really fit for the military except as snipers or pilots?

>>6700

It was most likely our BO after he turned into a Marxist.

>>6730

Why do you keep peddling this?

Is distributism fascist?

>>6950

Because it's true. Our original BO turned into a Marxist and purposely destroyed the board, there was evidence of it where he posted on /leftpol/ talking about how he had become a Marxist. After he destroyed the board one of our moderators, a guy named Egor started a new board called /3rdpol/ which was our bunker for a while, than someone else claimed ownership of this board like 3 weeks later (our current BO) and /fascist/ was reborn.

Don't believe me? Go to /3rdpol/ and look at the threads for yourself newfriend. I say this as someone who's been on this board when it was only like a couple hundred posts strong and a former moderator here.

>>7019

>>6950

Also, why do you think the word "rebirth" is posted above every thread? It's because the new BO took the board after the old crypto-Marxist BO destroyed the board and didn't sign in for 2 weeks allowing someone else to save it. This place didn't just come out of nowhere, it has a very rich history behind it.

>>7023

Get out of here pedo faggot.

Would wearing pins or anything be a good idea nowadays?

What about purchasing fascist literature and other items?

>>7019

I see now. I didn't stay on /3rdpol/ very long because I thought things were completely dead and only left after I found out the original BO deleted /3rdpos/ for dividing the community. It's a shame really, he gave us a fun alternative to /pol/ just to be swayed by internationalism. Hardly new to this board, my first post was this >>39

>>7037

>>7037

I think it is because he implements a lot of neoliberal policies and collaborates with leftist parties too much. It could also be that his crackdown on drug crime is possibly ineffective. Although I am not entirely sure.

>>7026

Fair enough.

>>7037

Like most modern fascists, they're purity spiralers.

Honestly, I think this is a flaw of many modern fascists. I used to be a big purity spiraler until I watched a cultured thug video one day where he explained that too much purity spiriling gets us nowhere and just leads to intellectualism which we as fascists are supposed to be opposed to.

>>7055

purity spiraling is an effective defense against big tentism, which had the alt right ever bother ed practicing would have kept faggots and trannies out that they now have in and prevented them from becoming a directionless democratic blob.

>>7055

You're kinda right but fascists still shouldn't cuck out in their core principles and if they are going to, it needs to be worth the price.

I see that the board is back. Who's the new BO? Or does he prefer to stay in complete anonimity?

>>7203

He appears to prefer staying anonymous he barley posts i think he is more bothered about keeping this place in order which is obviously a good thing

>>7217

That's fine. As much as i liked Egor and i hope that he's still here with us , i feel that a big reason for the failure of his board was his explicit and constant intervention on the board. That gives off a wrong impression on many people.

>>7230

dissolution of all private property, I think

just wanted to let everyone know this is the last time I'm using this tripcode its pissing people off on other boards unless some anon knows to how set one just for this board and maaaaaaaaaaybe leftpol.

I am concerned we have had a peak number of 80 active isp's but the maximum posts per hour i have witnessed are 4 why do we have so many observers and barley any people that post ? if we want to keep this board alive we will have to keep making fresh and good threads but that does not seem to be happening

I was seeking help for myself by trying to have sex with animals but people are restricting me from doing it. If I am such a nuisance to you people when I'm not having sex, I can't help but feel like youre trying to harm yourselves. You did this to yourselves. You like to harm yourselves I know you could take a step further and step off a tall bridge. You are working so hard for it all you need is the courage to take that final step you are almost there.

Where's this spam coming from?

This is the last time i am asking because if you do not respond to this one it is probably a good indication that you will never respond but can you please pin these 2 threads

>>6653

>>6654

They are vital to our cause /sig/ will teach people how to prepare themselves for when the time comes and my real life organisation thread will help us find places to organise all around the world so that we will be ready to strike so please for our cause's sake pin them

>>7350

How long do you intend to spam shitposts all over the board sir ? until you get bored of it ? or until the BO bans you ?

>>7356

Move to Canada your problem will be solved

I'm new to board so I haven't read all the threads on here, nor on /3rdpol/. I was just wondering: why does this place seems less focused or "redpilled" as it were on race? I realise that fascism was not just about race but I've seen some people on /3rdpol/ imply that Europe being overrun by non-natives wouldn't be a problem as long as it's governed by Fascist rule which seems very similar to the civic nationalist argument of "they can replace us as long as they adapt to our culture". And I've seen similar stances on the situation in the US where apparently the nigger criminals who have been destroying the country for decades should live alongside the white population.

Again, I realise that Fascism was not just about racial purity and that it was mainly National Socialism that focused on this concept but I believe that this is mainly because Fascists like the Italians and British didn't have to worry about their race dying as they didn't allow millions of migrants from other parts of the world into their country every year like is currently the case. So shouldn't Fascists of today adapt their ideology to this modern-day problem rather than go with the very defeatist choice of "well, they didn't focus on race so neither should we"?

>>7429

It's no coincidence fascism ascended in racially compromised countries, due to centuries of Arab occupation; Italy, Spain, Portugal. You can't really be an Italian nationalist as well as a racial purist.

Fascism is governed by the thirst for power, whereas national socialism is oriented towards order. It's why national socialism is superior. Don't @ me.

>>7433

Scicily was the only part of Italy that was under Arab rule and Northern-Italians are heavily intermixed with Germanic ethnic groups.

>>7429

We do, look at some of the older threads. We're not denying race should play a big role and we certainly aren't saying it's ok to mix up. The only exception to this would be the Brazilians but they were already so mixed that it didn't even become a focal point for them to latch on to.

>>7429

>why does this place seems less focused or "redpilled" as it were on race?

Because that's common knowledge? we don't need like 12 threads about it like in /pol/.

You have to understand that fascism is more a view of life than just economics and politics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McqXbRp92sI

I don't know why the link didn't want to embed .

Anyways fascism adapts itself uniquely to each country, I've always argued that national socialism is just german fascism.

>mainly because Fascists like the Italians and British didn't have to worry about their race dying as they didn't allow millions of migrants from other parts of the world into their country every year like is currently the case

True, despite that Jose Antonio (Founder of the Falange) didn't consider race to be a big factor but, I can't really imagine him to be a champion for multiculturalism nowadays if he was still alive.

>>7348

I take it my threads are not going to be pinned oh well if you really do think they are not worth anyone's time then so be it it is your board after all

>>7429

Very few people here think race isn't an issue or that immigrants shouldn't be removed. With that said, the reason we're here and not on /pol/ is because we want to delve deeper into theory instead of shitposting about race 24/7.

>>7475

God you're a fag.

>>7475

literally what the fuck...

What is the correct economic policy for a fascist nation?

>>7594

Their are a variety of them for fascists to choose from there is corporatism national syndicalism distributism national socialism and it's branches such as strasserism and others that i do not know the same of and this might be a controversial one but national Bolshevism

>>7616

"there"

>>7695

Argentine here. Pinochet and Videla were not fascists by any means. At least from what I know. They were alligned with the jews, Kissinger, etc.

>>7700

I know that neither are fascist. I am just asking how you feel about them in general.

>>7444

>The only exception to this would be the Brazilians but they were already so mixed

That's complete bullshit, pre-WWII white Brazilians were direct descendants of European immigrants and South-America as a whole was a popular place to both immigrate to and go on vacation to for Europeans only for non-white immigrants to shit their countries all up later on.

>>7447

>Because that's common knowledge? we don't need like 12 threads about it like in /pol/.

Well, my point was that I saw serveral anons on here (of course, I can't speak for an entire board but I saw enough of it to bring it up) defended non-racial fascist policies in majority white countries.

>>7469

>shitposting about race

You realise that there have been lots of scientific theories regarding race and the origins/qualities of specific ones? You seem to be making a conclusion that because "/pol/ is interested in the subject of race" + "/pol/ is full of shitposting" that any sort of discussion on race on this site would just lead to shitposting. Which I disagree with, the only reason why /pol/ is what it is, is because of lax moderation and because it's the most active board of the site thus it attracts a lot of newfags who don't really care about putting any sort of effort into their posts.

>>7915

>newfags who don't really care about putting any sort of effort into their posts.

This is what I am worried about if this board ever makes it to the top we will get countless newcomers that will fuck up the board it is almost like real life with the mass imagination to Europe we need to become more strict if we reach that stage it will be the only way to keep quality posts the majority

Are there any active forums like what Iron March was?

I am missing the place, and I am sick of the general 4chan /pol/ Trump worship line that people are taking as their stance.

I know of FascistForge and IronVolk, but those look deserted.

I am also not really into the Siege worship that IM got into in the last few years.

Does anyone have good materials on cultural Marxism? and Marxist infiltration of academia?

>>7915

Anon, even the white Brazilians had mystery meat ancestry. Whether Brazil had white immigrants or not wouldn't have mattered, the natives were non-white.

>>10

Just got to be BO of /national socialism/,still thinking what I am going to do with it

Anyway heil Hitler

>>5805

oh good now I have two reasons to hate him.

>>5654

I have one atm

>>8259

The Americas, Africa are all good.

Middle East is okay.

Asia is terrible and I think many asians would have a hearted attack just looking at that.

Russian's and Slavs are their own thing/people, only mainland Europe needs to be actually united,the Russian's and Slavs can do their own thing and maintain good relations with us.

>>8356

The terrorism by the side of the commie was way worst,higher body counts, successful terrorist acts with plenty of victims and even kidnapped and killed a former PM.

Italy was literally lucky that things managed to come to an end at some point, dangerous times and it wasn't that unlikely for them to go into a Marxist state had things gone differently

I'm not the Italian guy Btw,but you did

Say anons.

I know Discord is kinda Jewish, is there any alternative? Is there a fascist IRC server?

>>8411

Does ICQ still exist?

>>7992

People on FascistForge have been more active lately, and there’s more users now. I made an account the other day.

>>7992

I miss Ironmarch too. It was the one and only namenigger forum I could ever stomach, the rest of my time was spent on image boards. Surprisingly, they managed to keep the normal ego that comes with nameniggery in complete check, at least from what I could tell.

Gathering Sons of Liberty.

Those who have lost purpose due to a life of disinformation.

Only serious applicants need apply.

The main purpose is fellowship, education, and connection with our roots.

>>10

how can you establish which sexual practices are degenerate or not without being arbitrary or using the bible (of course by not using the bible I don't mean start doing gay shit or sucking a pussy after fucking/cumming in it, I mean things like sucking the pussy as foreplay, footfaggotry, legs etc..)

>>8623

Use common sense, you know as everyone else does what is normal and what is deviant.

Would anyone know of any books that talk about the origin of the Jewish race as we know it today? I'm not too big on history, always preferred to engage in science and physical knowledge a lot more, but I'm wondering when and how exactly did the 12 tribes transform from a bunch of nomads to a specific race with distinct features (that in some cases resemble arabs, such as the hook nose).

Thanks in advance

What are your thoughts on Albert Einstein?

Also what happened to Egor ? I have not seen him in weeks

>>1919

The Spanish Arrows and Anvil, why would you want a return to a Monarchy, the current line brought Spain nothing but ruin save Alfonso who was the only Spanish patriot in the Bourbon line

>>9117

well I'm an odd character. Sorelians differ between each other in philosophy but similar in tactics.

>>9249

Why not have all 3 ?

What do you do when one gets demoralized?

It has disturbed me to know people think it's manly to marry a whore.

>>9249

What's a soul without a body? What's a body without clothing?

Who here /chilean/? What do you think of the Socialpatriotic Movement?

>>9305

Here

> What do you think of the Socialpatriotic Movement?

They are not doing a bad job in all honestly, I wish they answer my email in all honestly.

Also check the translation thread.

https://8ch.net/fascist/res/491.html

>>9249

Just another attempt to one up other fascists same as always. The natsocs always do this with every other fascist movement but this is the first time I've seen someone advocate legionarism on the same basis

>>9363

The infighting really needs to stop we will only achieve our goals by working together in all honesty

>>9451

It was just a question, I want to generate discussion. Using the cage homes in Hong Kong isn't an appropriate example for market failure due to the housing market being screwed over by policy. The government owns all of the land in Hong Kong and due to this, Hong Kong has very little amount of space that can be dedicated to housing.

>>9450

Hmm, I guess so but I have yet to see some thinker make a case for it (crhis cantwell doesn't count), most of if not all fascist thinkers of old tried to find alternatives to Capitalism and Socialism.

>>9451

> You're on the wrong board, scum

Come on, don't be so agressive he's just asking.

>>9453

wait is that 3d pic for real, wtf?

>>9459

IMO Fascism promotes both collective and individual thought

Collective in sense it believes in cooperation between the different elements of society from the poor to the rich,punishing the rich if they are greedy or abusive,and punishing the poor if they decide to act like leeches

Individual as it gives it's people the desire to self-improve in their own way to achieve their

goals

>>9463

I am not a capitalist nor am i a "true" socialist,i simply believe that fascism is a combination of the best elements of both these sides and more willing to change it's economic policies to better suit it's people depending in situation they find themselves in

>>9464

It feels that anons are just scapegoating all problems of this board onto natsocs,but i agree that some of natsocs here are retards

>>9465

Sounds like you want a Nationalist Social Democracy. Go join your local Nationalist AntiFa branch.

>>9467

I didn't defend democracy and i dind't defend capitalism,i defended a combination of the individual and the collective and you jumped to the conclusion that i support all forms of private property,that i somehow support a privatized liberal democracy,and that everything should be done by private enterprise.

Not everything is black and white when it comes to ideology,so stop arguing in ill faith

>>9472

You answered the wrong anon m8,i think you meant to answer >>9468

>>9476

dem. happas are the true master race, right after italians.

What the fuck is your problem, Gaddafi poster? What's with the hostility, the Capitalist isn't the one being an asshole.

Thought exercise.

There's a white man who does wonders for the fascist state. Single handed he changed the direction things were going and brought a great victory. Killed hundreds of enemies, lived the ideals to the letter, absolutely perfect in every way. On one of his adventures into Africa on safari he meets an infertile negro. He falls madly in love with her but knows his love is forbidden in his home nation. He has more work to do at home and it will help improve things without a doubt but he now has to pick between two things he loves deeply.

What do you do in this scenario?

What compromises would you be willing to make if you were in charge of his fate?

>>8259

Canada and america annexed but

not mexico.

japan and china ever

south sudan and sudan ever

iran and pakistan gud

russia and any one else?

SARGON IS COOPTING STAR SHIP TROOPERS FOR HIS LIBERALISTISCISM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVpYvV0O7uI

The absolute state of Sarcuck. Someone needs to refute his points and turn this around…

>>9543

Why do you care what some fat mixed race cuckold thinks? He hasn't been relevant since gamergate but you're viral marketing him.

>>9545

That was not my intention but you're right.

Is it worth trying to filibuster hate speech laws by mass reporting things that cannot be proven or disproved? A man driving by said a hate speech term at me and I'm offended type of thing. Just overwhelm the system until every report is just thrown out?

>>9651

Whites reporting hate speech tend to get ignored. It's more viable if you can report anonymously, though, especially if you're mass reporting one minority group insulting another.

https://www.youtube.com/user/falangeespanola

What does anyone think of this channel? I don't know Spanish, but I kept my eye on them.

>>9676

That was my idea not for whites to report it as that's worthless.

BO the posts on here are getting worse and worse everyday please do something about the /pol/acks

>>9745

Try out other fascist boards anon,theres plenty.

>>9745

Maybe /leftypol/ would suit you more. All they dois whine about /pol/

https://youtu.be/nwyevHwUlKQ

As of now 42% of Germany's youth are descended from migrants and it just keeps growing

We are running out of time guys

>>9761

>>9777

I really hate you newfags who have infested this board like roaches.

>>9954

Then leave.

>>9987

I was here first. You leave. You're like immigrants coming in and shitting the place up then whining and wondering why people don't like you.

I know Italian fascism incorporated some aspects of hegellian philosophy, including the mysticism. I've read Schopenhauer and Plato in the past, but I no longer believe in an universal Will/Pure Act/The One. Is this a required belief in order to adhere to fascism? I have almost always being an atheist, what fascinates me about fascism are the values, the Spartan ideal, etc…

>>10104

Whoops this is not a thread this is a post

>>10104

>>10105

Oh well as Bob Ross always said there are no mistakes just happy little accidents

>>10

Any economical models of fascism?

>>2227

Didn't most jews livein compact areas until "Refrom Judaism" came ?

>>10104

Newfag question:

Why is this board dying ?

>>10279

Because it was getting flooded with /pol/acks but thankfully I think that has died down now

>>10280

Well, I am /pol/tard myself.

What exactly did we do?

Destroyed your natural environment ?

>>10292

Sort of yes I am not saying all of /pol/ is bad but when they started coming decent discussions turned into people calling each other niggers and Jews and just genuine childish shitposting I am glad they are now gone and if you are one of the few good ones then you are welcome to stay

>>10293

Thanks, so when are we going to discuss economical side of our policies ?

>>10372

I am sure there was already a thread about that somewhere but if not then be the first to make one

>>10373

Nobody is paying attention on it.

I guess I'll have to make another one on this weekends.