[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/feedbackv/ - Feedback /v/

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Done

File: 1429043168787.jpg (7.12 KB, 200x193, 200:193, 1414320233445.jpg)

abd842 No.1220

After finding out there's apparently some strife in attempting to divide and conquer boards, and seeing what kind of content is present in this board's catalog (i.e 95% shitposting, shilling, and asshurt), I think it's probably best to consider closing down /feedbackv/ and keep feedback limited to IRC, one on one, emails or tweets. At the moment, this board just looks to be a transparent attempt to cultivate a fake public opinion against /v/'s volunteers, which in reality, nobody who actually browses /v/ has a problem with.


The current status of /feedbackv/, by the way, is the same reason hotweels decided to nuke the old /meta/ board, as the majority of threads were nothing more but trolls and shills petitioning hotweels to change board ownership and meme spam. This was particularly prevalent with the attempt to divide /pol/ and /gg/. There's a similar attempt here now, with shills grasping at what straws they can (ralph retort scenario comes to mind).

I don't particularly like this solution, but I don't think this board holds any intrinsic value in helping the betterment of /v/ as a whole. At least, not in its current form.

I definitely look forward to the enlightened replies in this thread :^)

158394 No.1222

>>1220
Yeah, it's pretty obvious that this board is mostly useless, but consider that Hotwheels didn't actually nuke /meta/, just left it up there and moved to /operate/, banishing any /meta/ shit to where it belongs. /feedbackv/ is what it should be: a containment zone for meta whiners.

cd3c85 No.1223

Don't forget about Meta Mondays too.
What do you mean by IRC? Opening a channel for both mods and anons? I'm afraid that would almost immediately result in a circlejerk.

70cc2c No.1228

>>1223
Our biggest worry for having a "mods+anons chatting about /v/" IRC channel is it becoming two or three namefags kissing mod ass so that they too can do it for free.

For now, I'm putting the most faith in Meta Mondays for getting good feedback.

c39a70 No.1231

you people are the biggest fucking faggots I have ever seen.

afb9ab No.1235

>>1231
This.

35d1f6 No.1237

>>1228

Do you feel in charge?

d3aa43 No.1246

>>1237
Was getting caught part of your plan?

46d785 No.1247

>>1237
Lotta loyalty for a hired gun

35d1f6 No.1248

>>1246
OF COURSHE

>>1247
TELL ME ABOUT MARK. WHY DOES HE EAT THE HOTPOCKETS?

a82743 No.1258

File: 1429085687316.jpg (70.46 KB, 500x500, 1:1, 1428008217951-2.jpg)

Board owner, volunteers, mods, whoever.

Be honest. Most of these threads on here are being made by the same damn shitposters, aren't they?

c415a3 No.1259

>>1258
Out of the 1115 total posts on /feedbackv/, 266, or about a quarter, are made by the suspected seven shills.

082e61 No.1260

>>1259
Jesus, that's depressing.

35d1f6 No.1261

>>1259
I find it absolutely pathetic that you think a secret covert op is here to sway opinions on a dead fucking feedback board.

>mfw Mark was an overly emotional fuckboi who thought everybody was out to get him.

TOP KEK m8, you're pathetic.

a6a07c No.1267

>>1228
>Our biggest worry for having a "mods+anons chatting about /v/" IRC channel is it becoming two or three namefags kissing mod ass so that they too can do it for free
then just ignore them, or make a rule to prevent this shit (just simple "don't ask to be a mod")

46d785 No.1268

>>1261
It makes sense. Most people who come here are people dissatisfied with the moderation. It'd be easier to start there than to try the same thing /v/.

Makes more sense than seven people dedicatedly shitposting the same way on a board that gets almost no traffic.

691f9f No.1269

File: 1429111972669.png (2.54 KB, 250x250, 1:1, r2.png)

>>1259
Seriously people, stop reaching. On /metav/ it was the same fucking thing. You know what it seems like everyone is shilling? Because the only people who visit meta boards are autists that like to complain. It's not a fucking conspiracy, you retards. This is a complaint board. People are going to complain and shill whatever the fuck alternative board they own. It's going to happen every single time. Have you even checked the traffic on 8chan lately? Everyone's fucked off elsewhere, to reddit or 4chan or whatever. All this shill shit is ruining what made 8/v/ good to begin with. Stop letting /pol/ leak into the video game board. Stop letting GG make all of you paranoid assholes.

>durr that's just what a shill would say.

This isn't even an argument. You run a complaints board. People are going to bitch.

>>1268

Have you moderated a chan before? Have you owned a meta board before? It is always going to be the same small group of retards bitching on the meta board. Go back and look at >>>/metav/. One of the chronic shitposters got so obsessed with being an asshole, he asked for a permaban because it was eating away at his mental health.

Some /v/ users just like to watch the world burn. It's not a goddamn conspiracy.

691f9f No.1270

>>1228

Also /v/ had this in the past, and no one ever kissed mod ass. How's a /v/ IRC any different than people kissing Mark's ass on twitter?

691f9f No.1271

>>1269

I haven't been around for months, but I did want to say one final thing. I know it can look like goons or whatever, but never underestimate the power of a sperg with VPNs. There are people who hold grudges and do everything they can to spam the shit out of whatever ticked them off. There are a few people I suspect of being behind this and they were /v/ and /int/ posters. We dealt with them on /metav/ and /v/ in early september last year.

I've just caught up and read the threads and archives of all the accusations of a third party, and there's no real evidence that I can see that suggests it's a large organized group. All the screencaps of threads I have seen have the same exact posting styles and image macros of the spammers from early 8/v/. Sometimes it's as simple as that.

415324 No.1275

>>1271
>I haven't been around for months
Then how can you say "Have you even checked the traffic on 8chan lately"? You don't have any other data to compare the current stats to.
There hasn't been any decline in popularity.

c39a70 No.1277

>>1269
why do you guys suck these mod's dick so much? honest question.

c1bb4a No.1279

File: 1429131677433.png (146.54 KB, 508x496, 127:124, smug face.png)

>>1261
He literally said nothing about a secret covert op in that post.

He merely stated that bout a quarter of all posts on this board are by the same anons shilling for their shit knockoff, leaving the reader to their own conclusions.

It's suspicious that you immediately jump to that conclusion though.

35d1f6 No.1282

>>1279
I, Hens Den, have contacted my superior over at SFTDOV, to bring down the best of the best. His code name is Lost Cause. He will be dealing with you troglodytes promptly.

b39258 No.1289

>>1228
Protip: ignoring every post you don't like is not "getting good feedback", it's literally called stroking your ego.

Likewise, if you actually read the threads on feedbackv for even a second before assuming that anyone who doesn't like you is a troll (where have we heard that before around aGGros? Hmmm, HMMMM? I wonder!) or better yet, deleting productive threads, maybe you wouldn't be hated by literally everyone with common sense.

>ban people for making vidya threads

>oh I know! let's redirect them to a board I never go to, that's sure to help them find out why their vidya thread was deleted and they were banned!

Not only is there a large cache of such unlawful bans the vidyagaems mods put out in the skype logs they leaked, just checking the logs page and checking which posts were deleted in the archive reveals that it's almost always unjustified. At my last count, you were handing out 70% unjustified permanent bans, for example throwing in a permaban for ban evading on someone who had no ban record whatsoever, with post text that does not match anything else in the archive.

Grow the fuck up or fuck off.

b39258 No.1290

>>1270
Have you ever been to the 4chan irc? Top fucking kek. You think you know what a circlejerk is? You've never seen what that channel was.

c1bb4a No.1333

>>1289
Dude, I don't fucking like mark and have called him a faggot a multitude of times and argued t out with white on multiple stickies.

I've been to and looked at most /v/ alternatives and /vvv/ is literally the shittiest one and anyone who DOES say go there is either a troll or a shitposters who is buttmad that they can't post their bait anymore.

>almost always unjustified.

Every time I see this on /feedbackv/ and every time I look it up it's always som low quality shitpost like the "Anti-gog thread!" guy and the "PCcuck race #PCsucks!" guy.

I'm beginning to think people like you want /v/ to just be /b/ but with more people talking about video games rather than which underage girl you want to fuck.



[]
[Return][Go to top][Catalog]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]