/feedbackv/ - Feedback /v/

>>1253
Uh whoops that was supposed to be a smug anime girl

>>1254
>ignoring the subsequent posts debunking literally everything
Subtle.

>>1293
>Debunking
I was in the thread, you're either crazy or you think people screaming "You're just paranoid!" from about 30 or 40 posts that remained their only post for the entire thread.

>>1296
Toward the end of the thread there was a large amount of proof and counter-arguments brought forward to counter the points made in the OP.

>>1299
The only counter-argument I remember is "the mods are paranoid". You're welcome to go to the archive and find all of that proof you're talking about.

>>1301
>check out archive
>all the tor poster's posts were deleted
>the archive.today archive of the thread at post 752 was deleted
>it's clearly the same thread since I recognize the responses at the top of the thread
LOL.
And this is how I learned that 8archive only archives ~300? posts
Open wide: AAAAAAH~
Here's the archive.today: http://archive.today/ipiZS

>>1302
I'm aware of how to check an archive, I asked you to go and find "a large amount of proof and counter-arguments" seeing as you're the one who's claiming there were any, not me. I was in both threads, I don't need to read that many posts again to entertain you.

>>1305
So you're saying that you're proud of your ability to ignore evidence when it's brought to your attention?
Well alright then, I accept your surrender.

>>1306
So you're saying you read the archive and you couldn't actually find what you were talking about and now you're going to pretend I'm the lazy one? Well alright then, think before you speak next time.

>>1307
Almost as epic as one of those /pol/ holocaust deniers. It's totally different than closing your ears with your hands and going "LALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU" am I right? Yes, no SJW would ever behave identically to you, in fact, you're the anti-SJW and you're on the side of GG, unlike the bad go- guys at vvv.

>>1308
Making these posts is probably taking more effort than just grabbing a few of those hot counter-arguments you swear totally exist. I'm patient. Go find what you were talking about.

>>1310
I have already pointed you to the arguments and you just pretend they don't exist. You seem awfully obsessed with maintaining this pretense that you don't see the arguments made, though, given that you keep responding despite your own admittance that you're here to close yourself in your bubble and pretend you're alone in the universe.

>>1299
>>1302
Anon, I'm interested. As usual with my luck, I've missed both stickies. I've read a bit about all this in several threads and in the archive of the first sticky but I don't think this can give me enough info. But I'm not sure I'm feeling that much better already to read at least 300 something + 750 more posts (8archive and archive.today, respectively) either.
Could you please give me the most important posts that convincingly disprove the allegations? Also if they are from the first sticky which is not archived in its entirety I'd need a screencap at least. Seeing as it is not on archive.today that appears to be the only remaining option.

>>1313
As stated before, read the posts by the tor poster.

>>1315
Wait, how do you know it is only one guy posting from TOR?
Either way:

>the average anon dislikes GG because they bring drama everywhere
Not true. First and foremost because we're here because of GG. The deep-seated corruption back at halfchan was revealed only because of GG.
So it's the average newfag that dislikes GG. As well as a few annoyed ones from the first two major migrations. But they were rather vocal about their vision of fullchan not being only about GG from the start.

>are responsible for flooding 8ch with redditors
The board welcomed and subsequently tolerated plebbitors at some point, true. Don't know how it works now, haven't checked in a while. But I guess there would be no reasons to back down on this decision.

>and because apparently everyone who disagrees with the latest talking points planted by one of the many kikes in your "consumer revolt" is aGGro, GNAA or Ayyteam
>kikes
>"consumer revolt"
So he is not simply annoyed by actions of some anons (which may or may not be the majority) but is outright hostile towards the very basis of the movement. I wonder why he is here in the first place then. Sure, he is probably not aware of the fact even the most skeptical and reserved anons back in September agreed without any real objections GG should always have a significant presence both on /v/ and on fullchan in general until it have fulfilled its purpose. But he must understand that, in its current state, the chan is inseparably tied to GG. It was very much reshaped by the event, much to dismay of some of the real oldfags who did not care about this political bullshit to begin with, I imagine.

And this is just the first post.
Later on he just slides into the now-standard pattern - or a script, something he seems to accuse others of doing, from a cursory glance of the later several posts - of a post-/news/, second wave minimum /pol/ shitposter. The exact kind of behavior which alienated a lot of /v/irgins towards what /pol/ have become as of January tops. The exact kind of behavior that, along with proviging some criticism, does significantly more bring the boards apart.

If I were to step back and try to see the larger picture, to discard all the inconsistencies and red flags, to try and imagine an embittered anon, disillusioned with - or, rather, disappointed in - the GG I would see exactly the same kind of arguments I saw in late November or maybe December. And yet both then and now GG made SJWs and their puppeteers hurt, despite all those claims of them being useless and pointless.

>>1315
Okay, so I got through the forest of what is basically shitposts to >>3197631 and here I see more evidence of him being an embittered "early refugee", to avoid the terminology involving exodoi exodi exodus exoduses.
Then he goes into discussing rules, his dislike of the mods, other boards and so on. There were mentions of the supershitposting alternative /v/ in his first post after a wave of baiting and the like - guess it means he is from there? I suppose it explains why he dislikes GG - it is serious business on his internets, on his /v/, and he just wants to have fun and have total freedom overall. At least he has his board for that.

>>1315
And then he flat out starts indiscriminately shitting on mods (both justifiable accusations and not) while not very subtly shilling for alternative boards. I don't think we're dealing with someone unveiling the truth here. I'm afraid he's just one of the Blue's friends, maybe even the man himself.
And now you're going to tell me I'm Mark posting on a proxy or something, right.
What I am interested in is are you guys full on in league with SJWs, goons or whatever the hell those fucktards are or are you simply being used as pawns by them? I hope it is the latter.

>>1316
>>1317
>>1318
I guess if you invent posts that didn't exist, that means the evidence doesn't exist. Good job I guess.

>>1320
So you have seen the evidence (as presented in No.3197631, No.3197873, No.3197920, No.3198170, No.3198826, and so on and so forth), and decided to pretend it doesn't exist because it hurts your feely feel feels in order to claim victory, without addressing any of the evidence presented and without ever backing up any of the falsified or retouched evidence presented in the thread by Mr. Black. Well congratulations, you got yourself caught. What is the next step in your master plan?

>>1321
I see

3197631
>pastebin containing the mod IRC logs leaked when Blue left the board, which turned out to be Blue completely overblowing the issue over a HEposter being banned for spamming
>reminder that there's a bans page and a board log and that bans were issued in February and March

3197873
>perpetuating the idea that the /vvv/ shilling was a false flag, when the entire point of Mr. White's post was that the people aggressively advertising /vvv/ on /feedbackv/ and also the people claiming that the advertising was a false flag were the same people

3198170
>claims that /svidya/ unfairly bans people who disagree, which isn't under dispute

3198826
>more claims that /vvv/ is getting falseflagged because they dared to make their own board, when no such thing has happened to a /v/ splinter board before
>"billions of splinter boards"; I can recall eight, if we're counting /videogames/ (the text-only option) and /svidya/

Do you feel in charge?

>>1322
Oh whoops, missed one

3197920
>describes a Rugga thread and says it isn't a Rugga thread and shouldn't be banned

If you can find evidence of an actual thread that was deleted just for having an anime image in the OP, we can revisit that one, as it is now that's just a claim, not evidence.

>>1323
>>1322
Whatever helps you sleep at night, mark.
>if I pretend it doesn't exist, then it doesn't exist!

>>1299
There wasn't. There was that dumbass tor browser who was paranoid that the thread was a honeypot so /v/ could mass ban people who were hating on it and there was another tor post about how you need to stop "LISTEN AND BELIEVING MARK! LISTEN AND BELIEVE ME INSTEAD I'M MUCH BETTER EVEN THOUGH I DON'T HAVE ANY PROOF!"

But please, tell me how it was debunked.

>>1321
Why are you so mean? I asked nicely to surprise me and you went and did exactly what I said you would. Have you no imagination at all? You could, at least, try and pretend the screencaps are doctored or something to that effect. Shameful display, anon, shameful.