>>1627
Why everything has to be downgraded to "e-celebs?" Or if I post someone with 5 subscribers it will be fine, but if repost him when he gets a million it won't be because he is too mainstream popular now?
If you cut all your sources of any information, how do you get to learn anything about games? From anons? How would they know? Oh wait, reposting the same sources of information - gaming sites and youtubers. What about an anon? He can talk about the game after release, but can he post any actual gameplay footage or this will be some sort of e-celebing? Especially if he does it on youtube and people start subscribing to him.
Look, it is fine to remove retarded cirlejerk threads like "favourite youtuber" , "youtubers you hate" I have no idea why they are even allowed. But you can't go on an endless braindead boogeyman hunt every time a video is posted about someone reviewing a game. It achieves fucking nothing and it is stupid to begin with. That includes things like EC and Game Theory, though denying people laughing at them can be seen as an issue. And because they are not real reviews, making an webm and damaging the video quality is not an actual problem
At the very least even if youtube reviews suck at games or even have an ego about themselves, they are far more trustworthy than the journalists and you can always just see the game game in question while they suck at it and often they will share some important information. It something.
Just don't tackle the whole thing blindfolded and screaming like a child about OH NO THE VIEWS THE VIEWS YOU ARE EMPOWERING THE JEWS!