[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/feedbackv/ - Feedback /v/

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Done

File: 1427094328914.png (74.96 KB, 285x268, 285:268, 1412322957052.png)

07a9f7 No.583

https://8ch.net/log.php?page=1&board=v

Why are the usernames hidden?

bac6bb No.607

File: 1427154148173.png (19.47 KB, 885x131, 885:131, Untitled.png)

>>583
Just so you can't as easily call modfags out for their bullshit. It's one of those small circlejerk-backing measures.

a703db No.613

>>583
I've had enough drama over the past two weeks, the last thing I need is more drama.

5eea1e No.614

I actually couldn't care less if my name was revealed there, I take responsibility for my every action.
It might be hotwheelz-sama's global setting though

44fd18 No.659

Seriously, is there a reason to keep them hidden? Pls respond, Mark.

b63c2f No.743

I'm still interested

db0a0d No.745

>>614
It's a board setting which means only the Board Owner has access to it. In the setting you get a dropdown list where you can choose how you want your Public action log to be displayed, there are 3 choices:
- None
- Full log of all actions
- Full log of all actions, no usernames

4f1c1d No.759

>>745
I don't see the point in hiding usernames then.

dc00e7 No.764

>>759
"We want you to trust us, but we don't want any single one of us to be held accountable for being fag enablers" is pretty much what it tells me when they hide the usernames.

66d681 No.788

>>764
>we don't want any single one of us to be held accountable for being fag enablers
That's dumb. If someone does something stupid (undeserved ban, etc) then he should be held accountable.

dc00e7 No.794

>>788
I agree. At least /svidya/ doesn't hide the usernames of who does what so I can call for their head in the metathread.

e20bba No.796

>>794
Too bad you're all cockmonglers and think that having an opinion that doesn't agree with mods is called shitposting.

dc00e7 No.797

>>796
I disagree. I see a lot of people post coherent dissenting opinions, and not get banned, the only ones I see that do get banned are the ones who just shit the bed but that goes for popular opinions too.

If you really think that's happening you can always bring it to their metathread were a mod will respond to you and they'll take your feedback unlike this place.

e20bba No.809

>>797
>coherent
And here's the buzzword again. If someone posts a coherent (in the real sense of the word) reply with dissent, it's ding dong bannu and called incoherent. Every single time. You guys can't even tell when a topic is new or not and you end up locking new and interesting topic and redirecting them to off-topic threads, even, shitting up the conversation even more than just with the ridiculous muh feelz-tier bans over benign opinions.

dc00e7 No.840

>>809
Proof or GTFO nigger. Now I know you're straight up lying.

db0d42 No.843

Because then you won't be able to call out specific mods on their blatant faggotry.

You know, Reddit type stuff.

3da271 No.845

File: 1427707854386.png (51.82 KB, 1098x350, 549:175, 1427203216217.png)


e20bba No.848

>>845
Go check the souls threads for additional material.

There is one thing svidya is genuinely praiseworthy for, though, and that's not deleting posts that got people banned.

04592b No.921

File: 1427839478536.png (19.98 KB, 147x147, 1:1, 1422000021493.png)

I made a strawpoll
PLEASE VOTE
http://strawpoll.me/4009850

047b01 No.933

File: 1427915772769.gif (910.8 KB, 500x281, 500:281, 1421065363405.gif)

>>921
>7 to 1
Mark you know what to do

2de568 No.1112

Transparency is bad

16b474 No.1135

>>921
>>933
>82 to 7
>the 7 are very likely the hotpocketers

The people have spoken, Mark.



[]
[Return][Go to top][Catalog]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]