/feedbackv/ - Feedback /v/

calling for alternative /v/ to become >>>/vvv/ say "aye"

>>>/vg/ exist

>>>/vg/ exist

>>812
>>813
>>814
>Not noticing the extra / after svidya

Plus /vvv/ you're making me want to go to your board LESS by spamming it everywhere. If you don't like /v/ then stop posting on /v/ and it's child boards.

>>812
Aye.
Get /vvv/ in here already, hotpocket-kun.

>>812
>>974
Nobody wants to go to your stupid board

>>974
>>812
/vvv/ is just another irrelevant "/v/ should pander to ME!!!" board. Instead of trying to work with /v/ you just create another shit board. There is at least 4 right now that probably serve literally the EXACT same purpose.

But again, this isn't the problem I have with the announcement. It's the fucking extra / after svidya and its triggering my autism.

>>1019
We've tried to work with /v/ time and again. Everytime there's a poll, mark disregards the results outright, or moves the goalposts to do whatever he wants. We can't magically get rid of forfree mods, and mark is the prime forfree on here, deleting legit vidya discussion and keeping pure shitpost threads active 24/7. Also, IDs have shown time and again to hinder discussion while never actually preventing any samefagging from anyone but clueless shills that are obvious without IDs to begin with. Also, dem wordfilters mang. Truly double-speak territory at this point, no hurt feelifeelfeelz allowed. Moreover, whenever someone actually tries to discuss board rules or policies and problems with mods on /feedbackv/ (and /metav/ before that), it's always either utter dismissal with no response whatsoever, or making fun of the discussion without any response whatsoever. Often, mods would say "if you don't like it, make your own board!!1" Well, here we are.

In short, there is absolutely no way for users to do anything about the state of /v/ because the hotpockets are too strong (as a matter of fact, they're now officially at least twice as strong as on 4cuck). /vvv/ does literally the exact opposite of what you're pretending it does, and there is no other board that even legitimately attempt to bring back the /v/ in vidya right now.

>>1035
No you haven't. You've tried spamming what is literally the FOURTH general video games board that I know of.

It's not only unnecessary, it's retarded. Honestly if I were mark I'd be deleting all your redundant posts. You're spamming literally every thread with your board.

Your board is not only redundant but you're annoying as shit spamming it everywhere and there is a reason no one listens to you and openly mocks you almost every time you mention it.

> Everytime there's a poll,
If you mean strawpoll then you're a huge faggot.

>BWaaaaaaah IDs
Holy shit, literally the only people IDs effect are rampant samefaggers.

>Often, mods would say "if you don't like it, make your own board!!1" Well, here we are.
And your board is shit and barely anyone posts in it. despite you spamming it everywhere.

In short, you're autistic and are basically Bui lite.

>>1059
>No you haven't.
[citation needed]. I know what I've done, where's your proof I didn't do what I literally did?
>You've tried spamming what is literally the FOURTH general video games board that I know of.
[citation needed] again. Beside /vidyagaems/, /vvv/ is the only real general vidya board beside /v/. It is also the only one where moderation goals align with 4/v/ circa 2005.
>If you mean strawpoll then you're a huge faggot.
>mark makes a strawpoll
>proceeds to completely ignore the results
>"it's ok because it was strawpoll!!!!1"
Top fucking kek. Get the dick out of your mouth anytime.
>, literally the only people IDs effect are rampant samefaggers.
This has been discussed time and again. The only thing IDs effect is real discussion. Samefags can use proxies or hola. Many times on /metav/ when it belonged to /v/, and even on /feedbackv/, people demonstrated this.
>And your board is shit and barely anyone posts in it.
The board is pretty good despite the low postrate. Know what board was good despite its low postrate? Early 4/v/. Not that it matters because this is completely unrelated to any point made.
>despite you spamming it everywhere.
[citation needed]

In short, you're autistic and are basically new-m00t lite.

>>1061
You will never kill a legacy board m8. Especially /v/. If people migrated to another board, it would be akin to telling 4chan we can't handle a board and letting them win. People's pride means too much here.

No matter how shitty /v/ is, people are going to stay here. Sorry

>>1061
>despite you spamming it everywhere
>[citation needed]
You've shilled it in just about every thread on this board.

>>1062
Nothing wrong with /v/ being the reddit to /vvv/'s 8chan.

>>1063
[citation needed]

>>1065

>>1075
>>1048
>>1049
>>1028
>>812
>>949
>>1039
>>1022
>>1029
>>965
>>945
>>964
>>944
>>953
>>941
Just from the first few rows in the catalog.

>>1078
Did you even read these posts you linked? In all likelihood this is a false flag, probably from mark. You have yet to show that these posts are made by anyone who actually browses /vvv/.

>>1078
THEY ARE FALSE FLAGS

It's the simplest thing in the world. For example, act like a spamming idiot from /pol/, and everyone would say, "well, /pol/ must be a shitty place, let's stay away from there".

Someone's doing it to discredit /vvv/ as much as they can. In that meta thread on /v/, Mark pretty much said that /feedbackv/ was useless since it's becoming a "down with the mods, all hail /vvv/" shitfest

>>1082
>>1089
Christ you guys are paranoid

>>1089
Mark says every 5 seconds that /feedbackv/ (formerly /metav/) is useless because $REASON, and he's never even there anyway. He also voiced his opinion that the board should be removed outright.

>>1094
[citation needed]

>>1061
>Citation needed
>Implying I need a citation when you're literally all over the place making claims about mark
All I need to know is that I've seen your posts about going to /vvv/ in other threads to know that you're a very, VERY bad shill that is not doing your board any favors by acting like a total baby when anyone shows contempt for it.

That's why mark will always be a better board owner than you :^)

>>1094
>>1095
Feedbackv got the console war word filters removed.

>>1096
Cool delusions you've got there, but it's the first time I post on /feedbackv/.

>>1095
See the irc leaks on /metav/ (should be somewhere in http://pastebin.com/SC2yzjfw). Also check the /v/ archive.

>>1097
There is no evidence to suggest that. There's a thread about the filters with not a single reply from any mod and generally favorable response to these filters, and that's it. It's more likely that a /v/ drama thread convinced mark to remove the filters, if anything.

>>1101
>See the irc leaks on /metav/ (should be somewhere in http://pastebin.com/SC2yzjfw). Also check the /v/ archive.
I read the leaks when the /vidyagaems/ split happened and remember no such mention that the board is useless, only that the board has very little activity. Why don't you find the quotes you're citing, since you were the one who brought it up.

mark should link to the ama's we've done

>>1106
You're right, it seems I was confusing mark's and pink's statements. Pink calls metav a containment board and cancer, while mark:
[1/1/2015 3:23:28 AM] Mark: I'm thinking of not even going there anymore
[1/1/2015 3:23:54 AM] Mark: not because feedback isn't important, but because it just became "fuck maku" the board
[1/29/2015 7:11:10 PM] Mark: I do want to ask, should I still check metav?
[1/29/2015 7:11:20 PM] Mark: seems like all they do is shit talk the current moderation

Then again, there's
http://8archive.moe/v/thread/3059345/#q3059345

>>1115
Well he's right, /feedbackv/ is mostly a "dethrone the mods" board. It should still exist, everyone has a right to protest the moderation.

Not that the Meta Monday thread was that productive either, Mark hardly listened to most of the posts.

>>1116
I am almost sure I've seen him refer to /metav/ as useless (and that it should be removed), though, but I can't find the source anymore.

In any case, his insistence on not visiting the board because people hate the shit decisions he makes and the awful moderation he does, despite the fact that, as you mentioned, he ignores most feedback that doesn't agree with him to begin with (also see polls), should be worrisome at the very least.

Curiously, the other mods seem to be a lot more reasonable, despite their also being crap at moderating the board.

In any case, I guess he probably doesn't go out of his way personally to perform the false flags.

>>1082
>>1089
Why would someone false flag using a board with zero activity? It makes no sense.

>>1123
To prevent that board from actually gaining activity. A false flag is never effective when the victim is strong, it's a tactic to be used to nip the target in the bud.

>>1124
But the board wouldn't gain any activity anyway. There's too many video game boards as it is. Why weren't any of the other vidya boards false flagged this much? It still reeks of some person/people shilling the fuck out of it.

>A false flag is never effective when the victim is strong
That's not true at all. /v/ gets false flagged all the time by hackers and shit claiming to be from /v/, normies ALWAYS believe them.

>>1127
>But the board wouldn't gain any activity anyway
Before the board was spammed to hell for 3 days straight, it had decent activity. Adding /vvv/ to the boardlist on /v/ would have further increased exposure. Not having /vvv/ be wordfiltered would have allowed linking to threads of interest on /vvv/ and pointing out in general that it exists, for example in conjunction with people complaining about /v/'s moderation. Because of the falseflagging, there is ground to prevent /v/ from being shown on the boardlist, to wordfilter it, and to otherwise have it slandered whenever it's mentioned genuinely.

>There's too many video game boards as it is.
/videogames/ is a textboard, /vidyagaems/ is dead and handled by former /v/ mods, /svidya/ bans anyone who disagrees with the opinion of any mod (their excuse is that no matter how well-written and relevant the post is, if they don't like it, it's "incoherent". They use this excuse in exactly the same way mark has used "spam" and 4cuck mods have used "post quality" as excuses to ban what they don't like rather than what doesn't respect the rules. /betterv/ is a joke (it's not actually about vidya), /vi/ is dead, has specific rules and is hidden.

The breakdown is as follows:

            type moderation           HP             topic
svidya ib      super-hotpockets high           strict
v          ib      hotpockets           very high  loose
vi         hib    heavy                   ded          loose
vvv      ib      barebone              low          free
vid.ga. tb      ?                           low          loose
v.ya.g. ib       medium?             ded          loose?
btr.v     ib      none?                   zombie   shitposting
v2        ib      heavy?                 ded         fedora
v3        ib      none?                   ded         shitposting

/vvv/ is the only board that matches early 4/v/ in profile. /vi/ barely even tried. /videogames/ is its own niche. The other boards are self-explanatory. The point is, /vvv/ exists because no alternative is /v/ without the hotpockets, they all have some kind of weird twist for unknown reasons or are dead.

> /v/ gets false flagged all the time by hackers and shit
But in that case, it has no effect on /v/. As a result, the false flag was, in fact, ineffective.

>It still reeks of some person/people shilling the fuck out of it.
It's possible, but I think falseflags are more likely. Surely if it was a shill, he would make a thread on /vvv/ and try to convince others to help him, but the only shilling threads are met with negative responses (there are only 2 of them) or explicitly states goals that are the opposite of how the spammer acts.

>>1128
ayy, nice formatting.

>>1128
>/vidyagaems/ is dead and handled by former /v/ mods
Who created it for a barely-moderated version of /v/, which is what you're proposing. You can't say "oh /vidyagaems/ was made by former mods, it's tainted by original sin" when it is the exact same concept as your board

>>1136
That doesn't change the fact that it's dead, and lack of trust is a thing.

>>1101
>Cool delusions you've got ther
/v/ mods confirmed it. /vvv/ is being shilled by it's faggot owner.


Fuck off shill.

>>1200
Yes, good goy, it's not like they're falseflagging or anything. Good good goy.

>>1205
Keep projecting, though.

>>1207
That's all you have to say? I thought a master baiter would have something more rage inducing than that.

I'm actually disappointed.

>>1215

stay mad rulecuck, we will have /v/ in our hands by the end of may.

deus vult

>>1200
>/vvv/ is being shilled by it's faggot owner.

do you have any proof to back that up? keep assumming things, /v/

>>1233
Well the board is so fucking dead as it is literally the single most redundant board on this site I figure most people don't really care. So what's the one person that would actually benefit from it?

The owner.