2c89d9 No.36937
So what's the difference between a woman's sex drive and a man's sex drive?
d9ca48 No.36953
The natures. Men want to fuck a lot of women once or at most few times each while women want to fuck one or a few men a lot.
b209ef No.36976
One is front and other is all wheel.
1e7082 No.37042
One is powered by wind and the other is powered by sunlight
614c72 No.37104
>>36953>Men want to fuck a lot of women That's bullshit. Getting with many women is considered "cool" and nothing else, as is stealing mars bars and hacking the FBI database! When removed from this, as seem on anonymous imageboards, all men are monogamous and as sensitive as women.
1aaffe No.37112
women tend to want sex less, though when they do have it, they enjoy it more
cd975c No.37119
1befa9 No.37121
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Once his visual eyeballs lock onto a female, the libido is fast and powerful from the start, fast and powerful to the end, with a massive finish.
1befa9 No.37124
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
She could be with a 10/10 guy and have the libido fully on cruise for hours. But then he'll do or say something, her mind will be calmly saying "this is the guy that's gonna fuck you", and then all of a sudden V-Tec will kick in.
Hope this helped OP.
d9ca48 No.37180
>>37104No it's not. Maybe we fight our nature because we really like one girl but we want to fuck just about every decent looking girl we see.
f6e91f No.37230
>>37104I've actually always kinda felt this way.
822e41 No.37238
>>37121My sides, under rated post
a13c79 No.37243
>>37124>and then all of a sudden V-Tec will kick inAnd then you're flipped 3 times on the side of the freeway with no working cellphone and the next gas station 12 miles away.
Metaphorically of course.
95d734 No.37267
>>37104THIS.
We are conditioned by pop-culture and bro-logic to think that having sex with a lot of women is the ultimate life goal. Everyone wants to be James Bond. In reality all it does is burn a lot of bridges and becomes expensive, both financially and emotionally. I have a friend who did this. It is awkward. Then men who refuse to mature come up with this "We're all cavemen. Polygamy is the natural way." psuedo-scientific bullshit to avoid having to confront the truth. Once a man gets away from that teenaged bachelor mindset, monogamy makes perfect sense.
Even if multiple female sexual partners IS natural instinct, so what? My natural instinct is to kill whomever makes me angry, but we call that murder and it is illegal. Instincts are flawed and have no place in civilization. This is why we invented things like rule of law and chivalry.
With monogamy I can have sex and a deep emotional companionship with a woman who knows me and knows what I like, basically any time it seems convenient. I can focus more energy into my job and hobbies instead of having to constantly meet and seduce new women. Getting to know new women is a headache. I am speaking from personal experience. Monogamy is very pragmatic and convenient.
I like monogamy. Also, pornography helps.
In before "beta male".
474027 No.37271
>>37104I just get sick of being around the same girl for more than a few months
It's probably me though
80bd49 No.37289
>>37286
You okay there girl?
You sound like you have some issues to work out.
1befa9 No.37293
>>37243>And then you're flipped 3 times on the side of the freeway with no working cellphone and the next gas station 12 miles away.Absolutely accurate for female libido, I've been smitten with guys so bad that a car crash would have been preferable.
d9ca48 No.37417
>by pop culture
no. In terms of wanting to fuck, not relationships, not love, not eskimo kisses, not anything else – we are interested to fuck anyone we find attractive.
It's not about bragging, it's not about fitting in, you jerk off to a different girl every other day.
You walk around in public and see acute girl you would fuck in a heartbeat, if she would let you, every day.
This is not the same mentality as most women have. This is what we are. We repress our urges because we care for the girl we're with atm but once that care wanes we're more and more convincing ourselves to cheat and go after other girls
95d734 No.37505
>>37417Eh. This might have do do with being in the Southern States, but when I see another "hot" woman in public(which is extremely rare, most women in public here being middle-aged), a stranger, all I see is a construct of annoyances. I see a boringly pleasant facade like the face of a McMansion covering a collection of bothersome new pop-culture preferences and an arrogant full of herself personality.
I see through the make-up and hair, and find a walking potential headache toting a smart phone who expects me to interface with her social media hivemind.
That is one of the things that keeps me with my spouse anyway.
Also, sex with someone I know and love is already awkward enough. I cannot imagine it with a stranger without a large dosage of alcohol or drugs.
da4962 No.37558
>>37505Your spouse is sure lucky to have a gem like you, lel.
>>37104Yeah, I agree with this. Nearly all the men I know want and prefer committed relationships. Most people grow out of hookup culture by mid 20s if they were ever really into it in the first place.
5f094c No.37583
Milliliters upon milliliters of testosterone.
5f094c No.37584
>>37104It's advantageous to have sex with as many females as possible. Increases reproductive success.
Sexual strategy of females are the exact opposite of that because she bears the burden of pregnancy. That makes her selective.
However, women's conditions for sex have never been lower. Makes having multiple partners viable.
e37d17 No.42307
>>37104i only want a cutie pie gf to cuddle every night. =(
2aefff No.42342
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>37584>Biotruther detectedWoman can have sex with lots of men, but only one guy's sperm will actually fertilize her egg. And no it's not random. Lots of factors will determine which sperm will actually get in the egg, including whether she orgasms (greatly improves chance of impregnation bc of 'upsuck'), and of course whether she's ovulating. So it's actually in her interest for her to have sex with lots of men, rely on her internal processes to select the best sperm (she'll be attracted to different men when she's ovulating than when she's not, me with better genes, but the men she fucks when she's not ovulating might be better providers or treat her better, or be better with kids etc.), and then let all those men that the child theirs so that they'll all contribute to child care, or even if they know it's not there, she can keep having sex with him so he'll stick around and contribute to taking care of her and her children. It's also in her genes' interest to get pregnant every chance she gets, to have as many children as possible with as many partners as possible to increase genetic diversity.
a4c33e No.42354
>>37104>as seen on anonymous imageboardsSample bias. Anonymous imageboards are disproportionately populated by male virgins who are or will remain virgins well into adulthood. That means these men have distorted and abnormal sexualities which polite society rightly condemns. The distorted worldview of the virginal male even infects nonvirgin males if they spend enough time amongst the virgins.
6eeb4c No.42375
>>37104Please note there is a difference between wanting a harem, and wanting multiple partners
a8784d No.42379
>>42342>and then let all those men that the child theirs so that they'll all contribute to child careWhy would they contribute to child care when the child might not be theirs? As you said:
>she'll be attracted to different men when she's ovulating than when she's not, me with better genes, but the men she fucks when she's not ovulating might be better providers or treat her better, or be better with kids etcYou want men with "better genes" to ultimately impregnate her, and "better providers" to pay for it.
You're just yet another feminist, living the fantasy.
And learn how to explain your thoughts clearly. Your post was very annoying to read and make sense of.
2aefff No.42381
>>42379>Why would they contribute to child care when the child might not be theirs?Either because they
think the child is theirs, or because they enjoy being with/having sex with the woman and taking care of her and the child is part of the deal.
a8784d No.42383
>>42381>Either because they think the child is theirsWhy would they offer to take care of it if they are not
sure?
>because they enjoy being with/having sex with the woman and taking care of her and the child is part of the dealAt least the man is getting something out of the deal this time.
6eeb4c No.42384
>>42381>Raising a child being secondary to sexchrist woman
a8784d No.42385
>>42384Why should anyone but the father care about it? Get the guy who actually impregnated the woman to raise it.
6eeb4c No.42387
>>42385I meant that it's heinous to suggest that that's an acceptable thing to do, at least in my opinion, as raising a child not because you want to, or feel you have to, but so you can have sex, is a ridiculous thing to do to the child, unless you do a really good job.
a8784d No.42389
>>42387Blame:
1. The guy who impregnated her and left (smart motherfucker).
2. The dumb slut who got herself pregnant without securing a way to provide for her child and now must have sex with some beta bucks in order to have anything.
Guy is actually Red Pill as fuck, but the truth is that those guys are very bad for society. Women allow them to thrive, so it's stupid not to take advantage of them.
6eeb4c No.42391
>>42389or have an abortion
a8784d No.42392
>>42391That's simply not a viable route for a lot of people.
6eeb4c No.42393
>>42392Coat hangers are always a fair option :^)
I guess shit can always happen even when you've got fewer options. Good point. a8784d No.42395
>>42393An absurdly dangerous option that end with the death of the mother.
It's not just the means, though. Some people are morally opposed to it and won't do it.
2aefff No.42505
>>42383>Why would they offer to take care of it if they are not sure?They could genuinely believe the child is theirs. What if he doesn't know about the other men she's slept with? That's a good strategy for the woman, get the best genes to make the baby, and then get the best provider to raise it.
>Get the guy who actually impregnated the woman to raise it.What if that guy would do a shitty job at raising the child? Better to select the genes for the child and the provider for the child separately. Get the best of both worlds.
>as raising a child not because you want to, or feel you have to, but so you can have sex, is a ridiculous thing to do to the child, unless you do a really good job.He wouldn't be raising the child just for the sex, but because he enjoys being with the woman, and the child. Sex might be a part of it.
>>42389It sounds like the hero in this situation is the man who (knowingly or not) chooses to support and raise the child that isn't his. You can call him a fool or a beta, but he is doing god's work, acting selflessly, although he might genuinely enjoy raising the kid and living with the woman. Even if his personal genes aren't being passed down, he is dramatically improving his species' ability to survive and thrive.
714854 No.42509
>>42505>That's a good strategy for the woman, get the best genes to make the baby, and then get the best provider to raise it.>Get the best of both worlds.That strategy destroys the male's strategy. It requires that he abandons his own interests.
1. He did not reproduce.
2. He's committing resources.
3. To a low-value woman.
4. Who cuckolded him.
Naturally, it's what feminism is trying to enable. Fulfillment of the female biological imperative.
>he is doing god's work, acting selflessly, although he might genuinely enjoy raising the kid and living with the woman. Even if his personal genes aren't being passed down, he is dramatically improving his species' ability to survive and thriveWhat endless rationalization of some worthless woman's actions. As if his lack of self-respect is a valid reason to respect him.
2aefff No.42512
>>42509>He did not reproduce.Is that what the meaning of life is in your opinion?
>He's committing resources.To somebody he loves, presumably, and these days she could be committing as many if not more resources. He's there because the woman enjoys being with him, and because she thinks he'll raise the child well.
>To a low-value woman.Why is she low value? She's valuable to the man she lives with.
>Who cuckolded him.Who said they weren't fucking? Also have you ever thought about
why cuckolding is even a thing?
>What endless rationalization of some worthless woman's actions.Do you deny that our species is better off because of selfless people who work in the interest of others before themselves? Why is it such a bad deal for this guy? He gets to actually live with the woman while the alpha gene-factory dude got to bang for a few minutes. He gets to raise a child with strong genes, and instill his values and ideas in him/her. Cannot he claim this to be his child? Genes and ideas aren't that dissimilar; they're both just information. He's perpetuating his legacy through ideas, through the way his child thinks, which in my opinion is at least as important as perpetuating your genes.
>As if his lack of self-respect is a valid reason to respect him.>Only selfish people deserve respect. ddf20d No.42553
>>37104Not really.
My entire life was basically "fuck and forget".
If a woman actually tingles my interest beyond her fuckability, she's allowed to stay on my friendlist.
In my defence though, most women I slept with, preferred it this way.
5c99eb No.42556
>>37104This is what beta virgin neckbeards actually believe
Men literally have a load in their balls that builds up. Cumming is like taking a shit for men, it simply must be done. It's a basic biological compulsion
Not to say you have no choice but to cum, there are guys who think not cumming harnesses their chi and other bullshit
5c2fdb No.42730
>>37104Yes and no. Any good looking girl I see I automatically think about wanting to rail her. I dont do it on purpose, it just happens. That being said, id rather be in a monogamous serious relationship with a girl who loved me/I loved than deep dicking a bunch of random girls.
even when I am in a serious relationship with a girl I love, ill still look at other attractive women though. Thats human nature, and their is no way around that. That doesnt mean you cant control yourself from cheating on your SO though.Their is a time and place for both. When you are single and horny, fuck as many girls as you want. When you find a girl you "zing" with, try your best to make it work with that girl.
9af32f No.42732
Where is this polyshit comming from?
Godness of the sun empower in her all mighty purity please dont let this americans cross the border to mexico.
I dont wanna see a feminism infection in my country.
6960ce No.42776
>>42512>Is that what the meaning of life is in your opinion?Reproducing means one woman has considered him a fit enough partner. It has direct implications on his worth as a man. The more fit the woman herself is, the better.
>She's valuable to the man she lives with.Yeah, she's valuable to a duped guy who knows no better. Thinks the kid is his own and that his woman is faithful. Of course he values her.
>Who said they weren't fucking?Do you know what cuckolding means
>Do you deny that our species is better off because of selfless people who work in the interest of others before themselves?The only thing that's better of here is the woman.
>Why is it such a bad deal for this guy?He's raising the child of a better man.
>He gets to actually live with the woman So what?
>Cannot he claim this to be his child?No.
>Genes and ideas aren't that dissimilar; they're both just information.They're different kinds of legacy.
>which in my opinion is at least as important as perpetuating your genesThen why are you downplaying the genes part?
>>Only selfish people deserve respect.Only selfish person here is you. Men gotta defend themselves from your machinations, lest they get duped.
2aefff No.42835
>>42776>Reproducing means one woman has considered him a fit enough partner. It has direct implications on his worth as a man.A certain kind of worth, maybe. Certainly not the only kind. Was Issac Newton a worthless person because he never had sex? Obviously not.
>Yeah, she's valuable to a duped guy who knows no better.So you admit value is subjective, then?
>Do you know what cuckolding meansIsn't cuckolding when the wife has sex with some studly man? But isn't it implied that most of the time she's having sex with her actual husband?
>The only thing that's better of here is the woman.How do you know the 'beta' isn't enjoying his life where he gets to raise children with superior genes? Also for the survival of the species, ideally you'd have the best genes get her pregnant, and the best caretaker raise the children.
>So what?Because it's pleasant to live with female company and intimacy.
>NoSo what do you make of adoption?
>They're different kinds of legacy.>Then why are you downplaying the genes part?Because if I was trying to perpetuate ideas, I'd want to do it through humans with the best possible genes, even if that means those genes aren't mine.
>Only selfish person here is you. Men gotta defend themselves from your machinations, lest they get duped.I'm a dude, brah.
84a9bb No.42910
>>42829>wanting a monogamous relationship>in line with SJ fuckeryThose guys just want to get cucked
a13c79 No.42948
>>42835So you're a guy with a cuckolding fetish? Or just an alpha who doesn't give a shit about anyone else?
d6dce2 No.42960
107e73 No.42971
>>42835>Was Issac Newton a worthless person because he never had sex? Obviously not.He may bring plenty of value to society, science and human knowledge as a whole, but none of that necessarily makes him a fit man.
>So you admit value is subjective, then?Who ever said otherwise?
>Isn't cuckolding when the wife has sex with some studly man?Cuckolding is being betrayed by an adulterous wife. Forming a monogamous relationship based upon commitment and loyalty, upholding your side of the deal while she breaks it.
What makes it truly pathetic is how the man (and you) accepts it and rationalizes such betrayal away. You therefore condone it. Such excuses can be seen in your next sentence:
>But isn't it implied that most of the time she's having sex with her actual husband?As if somehow negates anything.
The truth is she's having sex with an inferior man almost out of necessity – she actively sought an encounter with a better man in order for him to father superior children with her. Possibly, the only reason she even maintains such contact with the inferior man is because he has the resources to "properly" raise the child. The fact those same resources are also used to take good care of her is probably a big factor as well.
>How do you know the 'beta' isn't enjoying his life where he gets to raise children with superior genes?He's not even allowed to have an opinion. He doesn't know the facts. He was played by his cuckolding wife.
A sucker.
>Also for the survival of the species, ideally you'd have the best genes get her pregnant, and the best caretaker raise the children.Indeed, the species could sure do without weak men like him and you. Men who don't even recognize the value of their own genetic code don't deserve to reproduce.
The species are not his concern. As a successful man, he's fit. He's successfully adapted to his environment. If he's not able to see his own value, he won't see the point of having his own children. That's the weakness that scummy adulterous women exploit. That's what enables the manipulation of these fit yet ironically weak men.
>Because it's pleasant to live with female company and intimacy.A relationship whose foundation is lies, deception and cuckolding and forever stained with the sentiment of "settling for the inferior man because he is convenient for the child".
If any man puts up with that, he has no self-respect – and therefore doesn't deserve any respect.
>So what do you make of adoption?Something completely different, done within a entirely different context and that stems from and generates distinct types of relationships between the people involved.
It is something the couple does voluntarily and with complete knowledge of what they are getting into – informed consent. They do it for various reasons, such as inability to have a child under their own power. They both know that the child is not theirs, but they want to raise it and pass their own personal values forward. It certainly is a form of legacy, and a respectable one at that since it is not built upon deception like cuckolding is.
That you even compare the two reveals the precise level of your mental confusion and lack of clarity regarding the interpersonal relationships at play here.
>Because if I was trying to perpetuate ideas, I'd want to do it through humans with the best possible genes, even if that means those genes aren't mine.Good thing that your ideas are not the only good thing you have and want to perpetuate, correct? Or do you genuinely think your genes are so shit you don't deserve to reproduce anyway because it would be "bad for the species" ? It's like some kind of biological version of socialism.
Your ideas certainly aren't good either – they're the ideas of a weak, rationalizing man. You think such a man raising a child is good for the species? I can only laugh.
>I'm a dude, brah.That's sad to hear.
>>42948>Or just an alpha who doesn't give a shit about anyone else?Whatever in his posts gave you that idea?
3f6179 No.42979
>all this butthurt in this thread
It's like you don't know shit about both men and women.
The sex drives of women and men are pretty much the same. But in this group the sex drives differ. There are men like women who want to have one single partner for the rest of their lives. And there are men and also women who don't want to have a relationship but want to fuck a lot.
Only because you have one specific kind of sex drive, it doesn't mean that every other man/woman is like you, and it doesn't mean that every person of the other sex is the same!
Tl;dr: don't be ignorant, know what you want and find a partner who wants the same.
2aefff No.43011
>>42971>but none of that necessarily makes him a fit man.K. He seemed to have a fulfilling life, and he had a positive impact on others. That's all I want out of life, I don't really care about my genetic legacy. I'll be dead anyway.
>What makes it truly pathetic is how the man (and you) accepts it and rationalizes such betrayal away.How is it betrayal if both parties agreed they would be polyamorous before hand?
>The truth is she's having sex with an inferior manI thought you agreed value was subjective?
>He's not even allowed to have an opinion.What if he knew what was going on and was OK with it? What if he wants to raise children with superior genes?
>Indeed, the species could sure do without weak men like him and you.Who will raise the children without us?
>The species are not his concern.Then he's a selfish fool.
>He's successfully adapted to his environment.I'm more interested in changing the environment than adapting to it. That is the uniquely human ability.
>That's what enables the manipulation of these fit yet ironically weak men.I think many men genuinely enjoy living with a woman and raising children with good genes.
>It's like some kind of biological version of socialism.Well I am a commie, indeed.
107e73 No.43020
>>43011>Well I am a commie, indeed.Welp.
2aefff No.43025
>>43020And you're a Nazi /pol/hack who likes to misinterpret Nietzsche amiright?
3ff688 No.43126
Men want to fuck more, women enjoy it more.
Ta-da.
bfa505 No.43181
96f814 No.43219
>>42342Upsuck is bunk.
But you're right that biotruthing is idiotic too. If you someone really believes that to be valuable truth, they'd go to a sperm bank at any opportunity to spread as far and wide.
bfa505 No.43309
>>43219Not every male can donate to a sperm bank. It isn't without risks, either.
"Going to a sperm bank" also removes all the implications present when you're directly selected by a woman. Somehow, a woman choosing a man's sperm from a middleman doesn't quite give the man the validation he wants.
Also, if he values his own seed, he won't give it away freely. He wants to mate with the best woman he can possibly get.
411ec1 No.43437
>>37505WHAT A LUCKY GIRLNigger, you should love your wife. That's why I married mine.
That, and she calls me daddy.
411ec1 No.43438
>>42342But who was /pol/?
1afba8 No.43831
>>43309Why would he value his sperm?
He can just make new sperm in half a day without doing anything.
2b6dc7 No.43835
>>36937women dont ejaculate
this changes everything : ejaculation produces addiction and compulsion
some women are addicted and compulsive but many can go without sex without minding it because of this lack of ejac and lack of orgasm as well, as most women never experience real orgasm, only the shallow clitoridian one
e4328e No.44706
>>43835They can squirt, how does that not count?
db762a No.44709
>>36937The difference is us men will break the law and hurt people in order to get laid.
Women dont need too.
I think you all should take a step back and really start respecting this.
b54203 No.44724
>>44709I'm a girl and I partly agree with some of the ideas behind that image, but it's still expressed in the most trollish and strawman way possible.
tl;dr you're discrediting your own point and turning women to feminism and against men.
d21619 No.44726
Women need more time to be turned on, women are far more socially conscious and require more status aka (the male being socially approved by other. Jealousy is the greatest tool against females for men. A women will completely disregard a man until another woman is interested din him.
d21619 No.44729
>>37267I think its more that guys really have to approach a lot of girls to get any, so they just harden up due to rejection and get that kind of attitude.
d21619 No.44755
>>43219because people aren't directly attracted to good sperm but to characteristics of the male that may indicate he has good sperm
81cc24 No.44765
>>36937MtF tranny here, gonna try to give a proper answer:
As a guy, the sex drive was simply an annoying need, random boners, shitty orgasms that made me feel dead inside (I may be biased because gender dysphoria, which is a mental/neurological disorder, don't let tumblr tell you otherwise)
After a while on hormones, my sex drive is really low comparatively, but it does kinda work with context, I'm pretty sure my testosterone is low as fuck, and my estrogen is in the low female range currently though, I need to increase my estrogen dose.
Anyway: I only really get aroused either by foreplay like making out, sometimes cuddling and stuff, or I guess I can still masturbate to porn, although my tastes shifted heavily back to more vanilla stuff, otherwise, without any context I don't really get horny at all.
I'm bi and used to prefer guys, but ever since I got on hormones, my preference has been shifting towards grills, I wouldn't really be able to say why.
Orgasms are definately much better, but I generally feel less desire for sex, and more for just affection and stuff.
396ab5 No.44767
396ab5 No.44769
>>44765Oooo I can empathise with this
I am on HRT as of almost a year or so.
Okay so I was only ever interested males for most of my life. I have always liked making out a lot, lots of cuddling too, just getting really intimate and hot. I have always liked that kind of thing quite particularly, whilst also liking less close body contact stuff too like um oral whilst on the floor and taking it from behind whilst on my knees. Well I've never changed much and the main difference thats happened quite recently is like the more intimate close contact stuff is even more enjoyable than before and other stuff is even less enjoyable. So kind of like you. Aswell as this, I started to like girls too! There's something really really exciting and enjoyable about getting really intimate and close contact with girls now. I… I suspect that well, I don't really want it to be the case because of how I've ALWAYS been disinterested in girls before and it conflicts with my circumstances, but I think my newfound interest in girls might be a particular preference, like I seem to enjoy it the most in some ways. I'm not sure. It's probably just exciting and will become more neutral with my other interests eventually… I think.
Oh also, I do feel like it's because of hormone levels maybe? But it didn't happen as a direct result, because it would have probably happened sooner, but it happened after being arguably isolated over any possible curiosities over girls because I was only ever paying attention to my BF and curiosities did happen just a while back.
a7a948 No.44771
I'm a guy, early-fifties, and have probably slept with around 20 women in my life, one or two only once and a few for several decades.
Male and female sex drive has a lot to do with the mind/personality in my experience, but it does vary in strength a lot from person to person.
I've had girlfriends with an incredibly high sex drive - the most impressive wanted sex at least twice a day - a minimum of 5 orgasms at night, and at least 3 in the morning or she felt neglected. I've also encountered a couple of women who were pretty-much asexual who I didn't stick around with for long enough to determine whether they could be 'fixed,' as it were.
With a lot of women it's a confidence/trust thing and sometimes feelings of embarrassment or shame. The girlfriend I mentioned thought there was something wrong with her for liking sex so much, but once I made her realise she could have as much sex as she wanted and that I absolutely adored her sexuality she stopped worrying and just asked for what she wanted. In fact, her sexuality was magnificent - a beautiful force of nature as sublime as anything that nature has produced. Once I got to know her I wanted to kill the guys who had made her feel bad about herself.
Apart from shame, a lot of women fuck up sex for themselves by using it instrumentally, i.e. to get stuff. Sex needs to be enjoyed and pursued purely for its own sake otherwise it becomes tainted. If a woman thinks she'd owed something for sex she's not doing it right because if she's doing it right she wouldn't feel like she's owed anything. The only woman who are owed something for sex are whores, but the rest of womenkind must do it for its own sake or they are thinking in a fucked-up way, and fucked-up thinking leads to fucked-up sex. To be good at sex takes heart, mind and body work and requires 100% dedication to the thing itself. Then the rewards can be fabulous. Sex that isn't given entirely freely and for its own sake is worthless.
The other thing I've noticed is that the sex drive of women generally increases with age, whereas it reduces in men. I think it increases in women because they get to know themselves better as they get older and generally have fewer stupid ideas in their heads. Older women are usually a lot better in bed as well because there is nothing more fun than a woman who wants to enjoy herself and knows how.
The best aphrodisiac is happiness in my experience. When I'm happy I'm horny all the time, but when I'm not happy I'm barely interested in sex, so my sex drive varies a lot depending on my state of mind. My guess would be that physiology counts for 10% and 90% is heart and mind. Most young people are too stupid to work this out, and, sadly, some people never do.
The question of who gets most pleasure from sex - men or women was settled a long time ago. As I'm sure everyone knows, Zeus and his wife Hera once had a flaming row over this matter, with Zeus claiming that women enjoy it more, and Hera claiming that men do. They agreed to consult the priest Tiresias because he had been born a man but had been transformed into a woman for seven years of his life. Tiresias settled the argument, saying that the pleasure for men was only one tenth part the pleasure enjoyed by women, which so enraged Hera she struck him blind.
This corresponds with my own experience because all of the girlfriends I've had who weren't fucked-up in some way have wanted more sex than me.
Incidentally, sex also gets better for guys as they get older, mostly because it gets less urgent. That's my experience anyway.
f97381 No.44777
>>37104As a man who try's his best to fuck every female he can get his hand son. (Cis,Trans, whateverthenewtermis, as long as its cute) this is NOT bullshit, sure fullchan is going to have some guys that watch to much anime and what nothing more then that single perfect big eyed girl that they think will make there life better.
But, in the real world, yes, men want sex more then women. Next question op?
f97381 No.44782
>>44709>for a lot of ugly women rape may be the only compliment they will ever get. unfortunately nobody ask how traumatic this is for the rapist.kek
f97381 No.44783
>>44765Whats strange… All MtF's I have been with, they are always "Just as horny as a guy" or "have no interest in sex at all"
d492bc No.44791
>>44780
We're going to need the source.
8db02d No.45024
>>43831Men make themselves valuable – that is their purpose and mission in life. When they do, they become fit. That's when his gametes become valuable – his children are sought after.
The owner of good, fit genes does him or herself a disservice by selecting low quality mates. That's what a desperate loser would do.
8db02d No.45028
>>43437>you should love your wife>that's why I married mineWhat an idiot.
>>43835Maybe some men just suck at giving them orgasms. Maybe that's what makes them low-value sexual partners. Makes sense to me.
>>44724It's wise to rise beyond belonging to any kind of group like "feminism" or "men's rights". We must put as much distance between them and us as possible.
The waves of baseless groupthink taboo thinking like the ones picture will only get more and more ridiculous over time. They get progressively more desperate in their wars and it's wise decision not to engage them – better to simply reap whatever valuable information you can find and use it to change your thinking and life.
a006d2 No.45124
>>37104Delusional. Simply delusional.
Either a good troll or a less than 18 person or mentality.
Basing facts on things you saw on an imageboard, anonymous at that is just… eeeeeeeugh. Get away from me.
You are the un-'cool'.
9067c0 No.48575
>>37104Not for me. I barely even masturbate to the same girl twice.
d39854 No.48583
>>42505I know I'm replying to an old post but this is the stupidest thing I've heard.
>That's a good strategy for the woman, get the best genes to make the baby, and then get the best provider to raise it.But the child doesn't get the genes to be a good provider. What is essentially being done is breeding out all the good fathers in favor of good fuckers. If the male caretaker doesn't reproduce, than in a few generations there will be no male caretakers, leaving only the mother to care for the child.
af6225 No.48586
>>48583Lol people taking all this evpsych shit at face value is always good for lulz. don't be a dooch. Ever wonder why actual evolutionary psychologists aren't massive faggots and distance themselves from MRA types?
The sad part is this is so ingrained in popular culture, I can't throw a rock at a comments section without reading "people are hardwired to love Macbooks" or some other fucking dribble. It's a huge magnet for both psuedointellectual bloggers and the "I fucking love science" club.
d39854 No.48589
>>48586What the fuck are you even talking about?
Are you implying that genetics don't effect behavior?
What does the MRA have to do with any of this?
I'm not even sure your comment is addressed at me because it doesn't address anything I've said.
2aefff No.48613
>>48583You will always have weaker men to be good caretakers, but you want your strongest men to be as strong as possible so that they can fight to defend the population. A population whose women don't prefer stronger men will eventually be taken over by a population with women who did.
50771e No.48615
>>37180Speak for yourself.
2e2bba No.48619
>>44771Dear treasured Gii-san:
>physiology counts for 10% and 90% is heart and mindCan't physiology also affect the heart and mind? After all, aren't the heart and mind physical?
In my experience, my diet has a very large influence on how I feel, and also how my mind thinks.
d39854 No.48620
>>48613> A population whose women don't prefer stronger men will eventually be taken over by a population with women who did.I doubt that. I bet those children will develop behavior issues due to never having a father who truly loves them, but don't let me keep you from reaching your dream of holding some kind of breeding experiment on some remote island in order to create the ubermensch.
2aefff No.48623
>>48620>behavior issuesFor most of human history, 'behavior issues' like being violent have been a benefit to the population.
112789 No.48655
Well me personally, i don't find a girl attractive unless shes reasonably smart and/or funny.
I think it stems from me growing up in one of those expensive private schools around models and actresses. I kind of started to just disregard girls looks more and more, the pretty ones are all just fucking peanuts, by which i mean uninteresting. All i really care about now is the personality, looks are still a factor though i suppose.
I would call myself a demi-sexual, but that's hipster and special snowflake as fuck so i don't identify like that.
f5c3ea No.48855
>>48586Nobody is saying anything about MRA kid. Address the points being discussed or refrain from shitposting.
f5c3ea No.48858
>>48623Most people today are not psychologically prepared to commit violence. Not even /k/ gun nut types. Deliberate violence is the realm of criminals and the military, professionals at being violent, and both groups face serious psychological damage as a result. It is mostly present in subcultures entirely separate from our own, which cause problems for us when our paths intersect.
The fact is women tend to select for these types of men. They are viewed as attractive and powerful. They are largely selecting sociopaths – people who can quickly put themselves in a special state of mind that lets them commit extreme violence upon others, which can include the woman herself. Fucking serial killers get money and love letters
while in prison – some even marry after they get out, sometimes with the woman in question knowing he killed his previous wives.
That shit ain't good for society if you ask me.
7aa869 No.48881
>>37104Agreed strongly. Yeah I mean I wouldn't object to a casual hookup in the absence of a relationship, but being with one girl is my ideal. Amusingly enough, every girl I've been interested in has been into polyamory, so what the fucking fuck? I actually had a 4 year relationship end because of that.
The funny thing is as a guy I'm finding myself becoming more okay with polyamory precisely BECAUSE so many of the girls I meet can't stand the idea of monogamy. The pop culture perception of men as emotionless sex machines is fucktarded. Some guys are like that, but I honestly have met more girls who want to fuck around than guys. Maybe I'm just weird.
6a43a6 No.48896
>>36937Men's sex drives spark themselves, Women's require something to spark them.
d39854 No.48904
>>48858Thanks for putting what I was trying to say more eloquently. It's shameful when a Brazilian can communicate in English better than I can.
335a74 No.48931
I masturbate more than my boyfriend. Fuck as I read OP's post, I was masturbating. I'm typing this with one hand.
5e01ee No.48968
>>37104>When removed from this, as seem on anonymous imageboards, all men are monogamous and as sensitive as women.There's bit of selection bias here. Nearly all of them men here are uber nerd and edgyterians on the political spectrum. They're not representive
591fdc No.48970
>>48931Kind of funny how some women can become insatiable like that, though most cases I've heard of pertained to Canadian girls. I can't just not see a pattern.
182d2f No.48977
783d00 No.49002
>>48970It's the cold, back in the day there was nothing to do on your frontier farm during the frozen months except bang.
d1127b No.49027
>>37505uhg, i know what you mean. I can tell i wont like a woman just by seeing the way she walks and how she sits. I can pick up on all the little things that just scream "no" to me.
e847e9 No.49291
>>37104I see the secret got out.
47d17a No.50213
>>37267While there are libidenous differences between men and women those exist in ranges. And those differences are ruled by the brain
8e4634 No.50797
>>42342> but only one guy's sperm will actually fertilize her eggHah, no
Women absorb and carry living DNA and cells from every male they have sexual intercouse with
In this study they provide a description of male Mc in the female human brain and specific brain regions. The study was originally trying to determine if women who have been pregnant with a son might be more predisposed to certain neurological diseases since these certain diseases occur more frequently in males.
"Collectively with data showing the presence of male DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid [32], our results indicate that fetal DNA and likely cells can cross the human blood-brain barrier (BBB) and reside in the brain. Changes in BBB permeability occur during pregnancy [33] and may therefore provide a unique opportunity for the establishment of Mc in the brain. Also unique to our study are the findings that male Mc in the human female brain is relatively frequent (positive in 63% of subjects) and distributed in multiple brain regions, and is potentially persistent across the human lifespan (the oldest female in whom male DNA was detected in the brain was 94 years)."
Through the study they blindly and politically assume that all male Mc DNA found hosting in the female brain was from a male pregnancy. Funny how even our brightest scientists can live in denial.
BUT, when they autopsied the brains of women who had never even been pregnant they STILL found male DNA prevalent in the female brain.
They did their best to hide the evidence. They buried it in numerous sub studies but I sifted through it all and found the damning statement, the one they tried to avoid. The statement that every single article written about this extremely important study completely censored and left out.
What are they so afraid of??
"CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women."
Its so convenient how they flat out ignore the MOST OBVIOUS source of microchimerism male DNA hosting inside the female body. And the periodicals just deleted it alltogether. The scum bags.
This has very important ramifications for women. Especially promiscuous women who practice unprotected sexual intercourse. Every male you absorb spermatazoa from becomes a living part of you FOR LIFE. The women autopsied in this study were elderly. Some had carried the living male DNA for well over 50 years!
This will certainly piss the feminists off. But it explains so much about women, life, and relationships.
Sperm is alive. It is living cells. When it is injected into you it swims and attaches and burrows into your flesh. If its in your mouth it swims and climbs into your nasal passages, inner ear, and behind your eyes. Then digs in. It enters your blood stream and collects in your brain and spine. Like something out of a scifi movie.
I love how the agenda has convinced young ladies to be promiscuous. They knowingly are sabotaging generations of young women. Of COURSE they are.
The male DNA can also pass into and become part of a fetus from an entirely different male. So if your woman has a long track record, then your kids are likely carrying DNA from her past hookups.
Is this why the ancient Sumerian Gods specifically said to not have premarital sex? Is this why they forbid homosexuality?
We have only begun to understand the power and ramifications of this.
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592#pone.0045592-Lambert1http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/16084184/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegony_%28pregnancy%29Get fuck'd slut
(No, you're wrong. Deal with it) Post last edited at
be5c0c No.51941
>>42354This, polyandrous men and women are often delusional and are usually only proving to virgins that they are cool for being indiscriminate in their choosing of sex partners.
95d6a0 No.54027
>>37104this is kind of true for some men, i personally am pretty big on loyalty, if im with someone, im with them and them alone. also, there comes a point where fucking a different skank every weekend stops looking cool and starts looking kinda sad, same as it does with women. that said, the sensitivity shit is bullshit, i am certainly not a particularly emotional person.
c82f90 No.54401
>So what's the difference between a woman's sex drive and a man's sex drive?
about 50 euro an hour
db9d20 No.54446
Men have a sex drive, women Don't.
Its pretty simple really
61a99f No.54447
ebcdac No.57356
Women's sex drive peak at a higher age than men.
Men's sex drive tend to peak between 17 and 19 while women's tend to peak around the mid 30's.
Teenage boys have a ridiculosly high sex drive, on a slow day, I had to masturbate at least once or twice a day and could easily do it 10 times a day, something I think would kill me at 25.
7325e9 No.57556
>>42505>It sounds like the hero in this situation is the man who (knowingly or not) chooses to support and raise the child that isn't his.HA
>a promiscuous man lays a woman with bad judgment>she gets pregnant>predictably he bails>it is somehow a good thing to support her and the child of these two peopleWhat do you expect of the child? How could it become anything other than another low life, that is another slacker "baby daddy" or another town bicycle? Oh, because the beta provider will raise it to not be those things, right? LOL
>Even if his personal genes aren't being passed down, he is dramatically improving his species' ability to survive and thrive.He is literally doing the exact opposite, you fucktard. His "selfless" attitude will become more rare since he didn't reproduce, and irresponsible, promiscuous behaviour will increase thanks to the resources he provided to unsustainable people who couldn't provide for themselves.
Selflessness is an illusion. Really, altruistic actions benefit people LIKE YOU and that's how the genes responsible get passed on. People in your family benefit from your altruism so even though you had no children there are ultimately children carrying the same altruistic gene as you.
Scum who doesn't carry the altruism gene(s) must not be helped. Altruism only works in genetically homogenous groups.
47d809 No.57572
>>48977> Ounce of semen is 60 ounces of blood.Nah, that's dumb. The "drain" isn't because of lack of chemicals, it's because of release of neurochemicals during orgasm which cause men to be more sedate (and drowsy). Obviously has an evolutionary basis, along with the high refractory sensitivity, in that it helps keep men from tearing a woman's pussy up to the point of infertility.
Primarily, in nearly all mammalian species the male reproductive strategy is to sire as many offspring as possible. The female reproductive strategy is to select the highest quality mate. This is because male contribution is momentary, while females must carry the young for many months. In her selection, being able to provide for the offspring is considered, thus wealth and power as well as looks are attractive. Meanwhile males are most attracted to indicators of fertility: Youth and beauty. This explains why men tend to keep their attractiveness longer, even into their gray headed (and wealthier) years while (infertile) females quickly lose desirability. It's not fair, it's evolution.
This also illustrates why women seek only the top 10-20% of men, while men find a much wider range to be as attractive. Hence, women typically marry up, while men typically marry down.
A sex drive is geared to the fertility cycle. The male fertility cycle is 3 days, while a females is 21.
Keep in mind that the subconscious and biological engineering of men to the end of producing many offspring need not mean they must be with many females; However, if the female they're with is not interested in procreation (or tricking their bodies into thinking they're trying to make a baby via sex with contraceptives), then the male's subconscious urges will take aim at more receptive female.
This also has the effect that a female is typically constantly seeking a better mate than the one she has, while a male can be content with his partner so long as she's putting out.
Once a female knows a male is interested, she will often "play hard to get" in order to hold out for an even better male; She will frequently compare the "friendzoned" male to her current and prospective mates, knowing that she could have sex with him any time she wanted. The "soft let down" "let's be friends" is not a "friendzone", IMO, as the latter term I use to describe relationships where access to the attention that comes with romance are present but the sex is absent. This is why there is a "game" in romance where men and women hide their feelings. If a male divulges their willingness to breed, the female can subconsciously think, "OK, here's my baseline, I'll try to hold out for a better mate and use this male as a fallback." Many "successful" males (who achieve their breeding strategy) thus remain aloof emotionally while broadcasting their sexually availability in order to give the appearance that the female should "get it while it's hot"; She'll resist placing him "on hold" to avoid risk not having that breeding option.
Female and male sex drives, and breeding strategies are emergent properties from the realities of child bearing and fitness seeking among breeding pairs.
Taking all these considerations into play we begin to see the male and female sex drives for what they are: Sloppy biased organic barbarism, and no match for pure pleasure seeking:
>>>/cyber/13712 47d809 No.57577
>>50797>Women absorb and carry living DNA and cells from every male they have sexual intercouse withYou carry chemicals that you eat, wear and breathe. This does not mean they have an effect on fertilization. Think of it this way: If I stab a knife in your arm, does that mean your offspring will be born with wounded arms? Even if tiny bits of metal may be present in the offspring it does not mean they have arm wounds.
You also carry a hive of bodily bacteria and digestive microbe colonies. Swimming in the sea imparts DNA from phages to you, and may permanently alter your biology for life. Does that mean the Sumarians who forbid premarital sex should have also forbid swimming? Breathing?
My point is: You're exhibiting confirmation bias about sperm, by your logic everything you come into contact with could be classified as something that "swims and attaches and burrows into your flesh. If its in your mouth it swims and climbs into your nasal passages, inner ear, and behind your eyes. Then digs in. It enters your blood stream and collects in your brain and spine. Like something out of a scifi movie." Even a french fry.
Determining if the DNA is active in cellular reproduction would be the first step in showing if it had any effect at all on a living being, let alone its procreation. Bacteria plays a measurable role as it determines digestive properties, and it can be changed simply by sitting near others for long enough duration, let alone kissing and fucking them.
Protip: Male and female DNA is on EVERYTHING. Dust in your home? Yeah, that's YOU, it's your dead skin. When you're sitting in someone's house you breathe it in. By your logic, it would be wise to live in a bubble as we haven't even began to figure out what the ramifications of visiting ones' neighbors house is.
c664ca No.57601
>>44771Someone screencap this for the future generations
>Thank you, based dad 5880a1 No.58173
>>42354This, but being sad virgins they pedestalise women. They see women as almost unattainable so they dream of finally getting 1 and keeping her. This leads the virgins to idealise monogamy, also projecting their insecurities onto their ideal women - that they will be completely monogamous to them.
People who've had a few relationships realise that women aren't some magical thing that's unnatainable - they're just people. People are replaceable and why not have sex with lots.
59b919 No.58177
>>44765
>shitty orgasms that made me feel dead insidei know that feel…
most of the time i cum without feeling an orgasm at all.
i have a pretty high sex drive so i fap a fair bit (once a day roughly), but i feel nothing… it's basically just scratching an itch.
couple that with a bit of psychological impotency and you're getting a picture of my current sex life.
867d9f No.58183
b1606d No.58198
>>42556That's why men masturbate all the time you fucking idiot. It doesn't mean you have to fuck every single girl you see or you'll die.
Nobody has died from not cumming for one month (though you don't get anything by not cumming either), yet I've heard of many people for not eating/shitting for one month. They're not even comparable.
974f78 No.58219
>>58173>People are replaceableSo simple, yet so misunderstood.
3f9b7d No.58232
>>37104This, it's once we've been with them and their nagging that we want to look elsewhere.
5b2f46 No.58616
>>58173Meh, I care more about a connection than sex.
The intimacy and enjoyment from sex is different than that from an emotional bond
7120e5 No.58629
>>37104>Getting with many women is considered "cool" and nothing else>Muh media>Muh social engineeringSocial Marxist detected
Fuck off. I have sex with lots of different women because I want to. I don't do it to be "cool", in fact very few people even know aside from a few friends in my inner circle who started to wonder why I was disappearing every weekend. I do it because for as long as I can remember I've felt the urge to sleep with as many women as possible
>When removed from this, as seem on anonymous imageboards, all men are monogamous and as sensitive as women.Seriously, fuck off. Just because I'm not monogamous doesn't mean I'm not sensitive. The relationship I have with the girls in my life goes way beyond hookups. We chat with each other about our lives, watch movies together, and generally value each other's company. They talk to me about their problems and I help them work things out. I don't just hit it and quit it like you seem to be implying.
259262 No.58725
>>58629>settling down and having children>cultural marxismOh wait, I suppose you must have alot of kids by now. Thank you for contributing to society and not just thinking about 'muh dick'
b1606d No.58731
>>58629> chat with each other about our lives, watch movies together, and generally value each other's companywhat an interesting life you must lead
before you jump in a fit of rage, this has nothing to do with your argument about being promiscuous and i'm simply attacking your personality for being such a bland lifeless faggot with no real passion or hobbies
7120e5 No.58737
>>58725Nigger the fuck are you on about? Are you one of those "sex is only for reproduction" faggots?
>>58731>Implying that the things I chose specifically with regards to the topic about sensitivity is representative of everything that I do with womenHow's autism treating you?
dff204 No.58744
>>37104I would literally fuck around 80% of grills my age given the chance. idk what bitch ass men you're talking to.
be5c0c No.58801
ITT: people inflate their virility