1ea2eb No.58287
>swami is bad!
>because she is pedo
Are you guys fucking retarded, SJWs or still believe that pedophiles are bad people?
I know that you jews always try to misinform each other by
-Name calling
-saying random things without a proper source
-using strawmans
But your ignorance is really Pissing me off.
Lets make a crashcourse about pedophiles:
Pedophile simply means "childloving", like hydrophile means "waterloving" or arachnophobe means "spidershating".
And what does child mean? Pedo is especially the range between the ages 6 to 10, while hebe is from 10 to 14.
So calling someone who loves teenager girl "pedophile" is fucking retarded.
Now lets define "love": I think every father or mother loves his/her child. But since we always relate the word "phile" with something sexual, we want to discuss about sexual Attraction to children. There are actually people who get horny to your girls/boys. The getting horny part is pretty normal imo, because it's a fetish after all. It's an attraction, it's more natural than most other fetishes since all other fetishes are about acts or objects but pedophilia is attraction to girls who are able to become wifes to carry babys.
cont.
490f0a No.58290
>>>/suicide/You know what to do.
a950a8 No.58293
Don't try to break it down all scholarly. Pedophile = kiddie diddler. In a modern society that wishes to produce productive, contributing, and well adjusted people, fetishizing children is not in anyone's best interest. There is no high road to taking sexual advantage of people that need adult help just to not die.
3d2d8b No.58294
>still believe that pedophiles are bad people
Someone sounds like a pedophile here. I don't know where you're from, but here it's a pretty fucking major crime.
1ea2eb No.58295
But everyone believes that a pedophile is a fucking child rapist. I don't know why you believe this retarded nonsense, but I will blame the jews again…
A man who rapes a little girl… What exactly is he? You would say pedophile but if you think about it, there are different groups of people.
Someone who rapes a child is more a sadist, someone who expresses his dominance by raping a much weaker person. It's a sadism fetish where you don't love a child because you fucking rape her. Hell, even the child rapists torture those little children because they have an affection for it.
Someone who want to have normal sex with a child is more attracted to the body and outer appereance of a little girl. Those people have indeed a sexual desire for little children, but that's more a fetish. How do you call a gay man? A homosexual. Not a homophile. That's why we call those people pedosexuals: they are sexually attracted to children from the agerange between 6 to 10.
And what is a pedophile? Well, like I said, someone who loves children. And that's mostly liking the traits and perks of little children. Pedophiles just want to hug a child if they see one and be nice to them. It's not sexual attraction.
Someone can be pedophile and pedosexual at the same time, but saying pedophiles are child rapists is just wrong
36dbca No.58296
i'm not even a pedo, too, which is the best part. /baphomet/ is just ass-shattered they can't dox me or bother me.
1ea2eb No.58299
>>58294Are you from soviet russia? Because saying
>you are a pedophile so everything you say is wrongIs pretty fucking cheap and retarded
8aaa3d No.58300
>that feel when you remember 4chan from 2007
>pedobear, Chris Chansen threads, daily CP dumps
>It's all gone, the newfags came and their brainwashing instructs them that pedo = bad
>They never challenge that notion, even to just have a laugh
a950a8 No.58302
>>58295>doesn't care how meanings of words don't stay the same over time.Go ahead and call yourself a pedophile, see how well that goes for you. Also oughtta go use the word "nigger" to describe an ignorant person in a black neighborhood while you're at it.
1ea2eb No.58303
>>58296/bapometh/ can right fuck off, I never cared for those wannabe /b/pol/tards.
You can also fuck off, too, Swami for being an opressive mod who doesn't allow free speech in form of constructive critism.
Everytime when someone says something "bad" about /fem/, you call it "whining about /fem/" or beta male shit, /bapometh/ or give another retarded reason to ban him.
That's fucking crazy, don't ban everyone, /fem/ isn't the perfect board, and you shouldn't Act like a cunt.
But yeah, fuck those /bapometh/ guys and fuck you, too
3687fa No.58305
>>58294> here it's a pretty fucking major crimeThis sort of patriarchal oppression is why I need Feminism.
3d2d8b No.58306
>>58303So make your own /fem/
Honestly banning beta-males .etc is what makes this board good
b05b85 No.58308
when did /fem/ turn into /swami/
no-one's oppressing you pls go
759ae3 No.58311
>>58306If there was no quality control, the board would be completely overrun with shitposters.
1ea2eb No.58321
>>58306>a board is bad>lets make a new board instead of fixing the old one Pic related, it's you
And what do you even understand as a beta male? Why not banning the beta /fem/s too? Aren't they shit, too? Or is this your Fortress of femenism where it's ok if the female equivalent of a shitty male shitposts here?
If you ban tfw no gf threads, then you should also ban tfw no bf threads, because both of them are dumb as fuck.
300f57 No.58325
To be fair it is kind of cited to have more meaning than just child-loving. Misogynist is also cited to have more meaning than female-hating. But the case with both of those is really weird to me, they should just simply mean those things and shouldn't have twisted meaning because of the general manifestation of them.
Also paedophiles to me are okay if they don't actually impose themselves in any sexual way to children. Also lolicon should be legal.
Denouncing Swami being a supposed paedophile is a way to instigate and slander her for people who hate her and want to emphasise a bad image about her.
a950a8 No.58331
>>58329Change =\= improvement
b05b85 No.58332
>>58321>if you ban tfw no gf threads, then you should also ban tfw no bf threadsThere's already a place for >tfw no gf, though, and it's hostile to femanon feels.
>>>/r9k/ 1ea2eb No.58334
>>58332I didn't get banned for that
Just for posting a joke about the rules.
1ea2eb No.58335
>>58331Well, I don't want to change /fem/ but Improve it.
I also never ever said in my posts that I want to change /fem/, so you can take your shitty strawmans elsewhere
b05b85 No.58337
>>58334I don't particularly care why you got banned. It's beside the point. There are already places for beta male feels, and for fascists to talk about combating degeneracy, and for red pill shit. If people want to talk or read about that stuff, they'll go to those places, but some asymmetry in what gets b& and what /fem/ lets fly is perfectly justifiable. A femanon feels thread on /r9k/
will get swarmed by bitter dudes convinced that it is literally impossible for women to feel lonely. Maybe they're right; I don't know and I don't care. The problem is there's demand for both, but without /fem/ there's only space for robot feels.
If you leave robots to do their thing unchecked on /fem/, they'll shit threads up with 500 posts of "pls be my gf i don't care if you're fat i just need someone," or they'll derail them with inane moral judgements, as they do every time femanons make themselves known. No-one wants to read that.
1ea2eb No.58340
>>58337I totally understand what you mean, those are actually the people who shit /fem/ up, but what botters me is that every male person on /fem/ is a potential beta male. And can potentially get banned for posting beta male stuff.
Now I just want to know: is /fem/ a feels board? Like /r9k/? Or can you post whatever you want here without being a total shitposting fag?
Because feels thread are generally shit. It's always the same reposted bullshit. I'm not saying that betamales are welcome here, but that beta shitposting should be properly defined and consequently banned.
bac7a3 No.58346
b05b85 No.58348
>>58340>It's always the same reposted bullshit.Not always. And anyway, unlike /r9k/, the feels here are largely contained to one or two threads. If it were out of control I'd see the merit to cracking down on that sort of posting.
>every male person on /fem/ is a potential beta male…beta shitposting should be properly defined and consequently bannedThat's a decent point. I'd say the folks that need banning are the ones inviting pity parties, fishing for gfs, or being shit disturbers (angry or accusatory political posts wreck threads, I think).
3d2d8b No.58359
>>58335To fix something means it's broken. Fixing it changes it. I like /fem/ in its current "broken" state just fine. So you can suck on it.
ee1391 No.58364
>>58359Well, that's just your opinion, man
If you stop improving yourself/your environment, you will never reach anything. It's like giving up.
3d2d8b No.58368
>>58364If changing means allowing betamales then that's not an improvement
36dbca No.58371
>>58368BTFO
exactly. baphomet go home
>>58364 ee1391 No.58372
>>58368Improving means more equality with less shitposting, whereas shitposting is properly defined and well regulated
ee1391 No.58374
>>58371You didn't understand the purpose of this thread, did you?
Stop banning random people and start banning beta fem fags, too
ee1391 No.58375
>>58368I also never said that we should allow beta makes so you both can, again, fuck off with your strawmen
36dbca No.58378
>>58374this thread was created by a member of /fem/ to laugh at baphomet and the rest of you beta males
go home, you're not welcome here.
f28456 No.58382
>>58378>this thread was created by a member of /fem/ to laugh at baphomet and the rest of you beta malesSomehow I don't believe that at all.
ee1391 No.58385
>>58378But that's fucking wrong, Swami, it's still me and it's a thread to protect my personal rights
>>58382Second
>>58380I hate feels threads. I hate many things actually, but I try to tell everyone to fuck off who shits the place up I like to visit.
36dbca No.58388
>>58386>>58385sorry this thread has now been re-assigned to make fun of baphomet**
ee1391 No.58389
>>58378And why am I not welcome? Because You dumb fucks believe that I'm a beta male for giving some critique? Is this your communistic strategy to opress my freedoms more?
Shit, I don't know if you are jews or retarded but one thing is sure, you should stop being so goddamn ignorant.
ee1391 No.58394
>>58388I thought it would be clear that /bapometh/ and their pics are dumb as fuck and no educated person would ever believe their shit, I don't want to go trough all that all over again.
Also banning people doesn't work on 8chan since it's piss poor easy to evade a ban here. Even I changed my IP
3d2d8b No.58420
>>58389>>58394Post dick to prove your male Privilege. Then we will take your comments under advisement.
63716d No.58421
>>58420I can post my ass if you want
63716d No.58426
>>58424It's an old pic, I posted new ass pics on another thread which probably 404ed
2ccb50 No.58434
>>58426>chum goes to /fem/ of all placesStay here in your little cancer shitposter hole you fucking faggot and never come back to the good website.
bfd789 No.58502
Swami is bad becase she/it won't save the shitposting for home turf.
63716d No.58520
>>58434Why? You are here, too?
63716d No.58531
>>71332
>>71331
It IS my ass! :o
2ccb50 No.58555
>>58520The thread linked me here and then I saw your fucking faggot picture, I actually hope you perish in a fire you miserable little worm. Don't ever come back to the good website ever again.
aa52e6 No.58860