d2f20a No.58992
/b/, /redchanit/, and /baphomet/ want to dox Swami and "level up" on her by tying her up, shaving her head, and putting the video of it online.
Threads:
http://8ch.net/b/res/1750053.htmlhttp://8ch.net/redchanit/res/6054.htmlhttp://8ch.net/baphomet/res/62432.htmlDo you think this is a joke shitpost?
I wonder how Swami would react if this were for real?
b48765 No.58994
>A wild anon appears!
>Swami uses Seduce!
>It's super effective!
a34a5d No.58995
How about this?
She's a grown ass adult who is responsible for her own actions and you don't drag any of us into petty bullshit which has gone on for far too long? You guys slam white knights and yet here you are doing the fucking same.
3960e8 No.58997
>implying you're not OP of all those threads
69d3e6 No.59001
>implying swami wouldn't be the one raping them
dc30bd No.59014
I've never seen a picture of Swami, but I had always imagined her to have a shaved head/punkish hair-style for some reason.
41f8ef No.59019
>>58992One person made these three threads and not a single response agreed with them. And the only reason you'd act like it was serious was if you're the one who made those threads trying to stir shit up. Why you trying to turn board against board OP?
41f8ef No.59020
>>58992>Threads with essentially no responses>All responses against the idea >Threads not linking to eachotherYou found all these threads pretty easy OP, you must brose these boards pretty heavily if you weren't the OP in all of them. But then you'd know /redchanit/ is a joke board
1b4982 No.59035
de7c59 No.59041
Dear Swami:
Canada may not be as good as the US in terms of gun freedoms, but you can still get a gun if you play nice with the bureaucratic procedures. You don't need other anons to come to your rescue to defend you from /baph/, just get a goddamn gun.
Sincerely,
Anon.
379ab6 No.59042
BASED SWAMI
A
S
E
D
S
W
A
M
I
4db3b1 No.59043
>>58992I like how basically all of the responses are variations of "fuck off OP we are not your personal army."
66e9fe No.59046
>>59020OP posted all of these threads, then posted here to stir up shit. Obvious false flag attempt. You can always tell because the phrasing is weirdly violent and hateful, rather than shitty and dismissive (which is way more common.)
640215 No.59048
>>58992Redchanit here, fuck off Swami, for the last time we don't want to level up in your repulsive cunt
66e9fe No.59049
I am here and even though I am not a female, I would like to call everyone's attention to the threat itself: shaving a woman's head.
Speaking as a guy, we generally don't care about hair. That's not a big thing that comes to mind when fucking with someone. That is a very female-driven threat, I don't think any guy would go right for the hair like women do when they fight or prank each other.
Swami confirmed for weird fetish.
96196e No.59055
>>59049>Speaking as a guy, we generally don't care about hair.Not all men Sagefag. Touching my hair is a trigger
372fd8 No.59056
>>59055How about cumming in it?
5f0dd6 No.59061
>>59048you clearly haven't seen her cunt m8
640215 No.59063
>>59061>implying those nudes were real 5f0dd6 No.59065
>>59063STOP RUINING MY FUN ANON
1b4982 No.59078
>>59068I hope that your ID means you speak the truth, great prophet.
d2f20a No.59220
>>59068Swami, is that you? They unfortunately made a lolcow about this. Look.
http://8ch.net/cow/res/57384.htmlI hope this isn't you just seeking attention like how they ar saying.
Love You.
fa471a No.59225
the butthurt anon constantly whining about me should make an article on encylopedia dramatica about me at this point
a241d9 No.59227
>>59225Oh u fucking wish. They know how to deal with GOTIS over there. You'll never get an article. You will never get more attention. Kill yourself.
fa471a No.59228
>>59227they're already giving me sweet, delicious attention here
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Baphomet#Swami_drama.2C_February_2015.2C_ongoingthanks bapho-lolcows, further enabling me.
772f73 No.59230
>>59228Why are you proud of a ED article?
fa471a No.59231
>>59230it's hilarious to me
i hope somebody does make an article on me
7c4126 No.59232
>>59230Probably has to do with her ass burgers
772f73 No.59235
>>59231Swami, can you please just run a decent board and not be an attention whore?
772f73 No.59236
>>59235And isn't this the CSS from girltalk, only in different colours?
d2f20a No.59237
>>59231You're enjoying this huh, aren't you. I hope those nasty anons are not out to get you. Then again, I wonder how you would deal with a pack of anons trying to tie you up and humiliate you on camera like in some TV show episode. I hope you're armed. Are Canadians usually armed? I have a hand gun and huning rifle for just such a scenario.
fa471a No.59238
>>59236i wanted something like beauty but they have too dark colours, and i wanted something like GT, but they have too bright of colours
772f73 No.59239
>>59238Why didn't you just make your own CSS.
Also a colour suggestion. Not pink, this looks like it's for 12 year old girls, maybe a light purple shade.
b00e2a No.59241
>>59237quick reminder:
ignore swami and win
d2f20a No.59242
>>59239I like the pink, but nice idea. Is a border possible, like something like a tanglied vine bearing fruit against a beautiful backround made to look like the white trusses of some beautiful garden structure. Kind of wedding-like, but I just see it as a garden-type structure.
fa471a No.59245
>>59242that can be done, ye
3960e8 No.59250
>>59241>wants people to ignore swami>makes professional looking graph all about swami 1a3b70 No.59255
>Do you think this is a joke shitpost?
Is this a serious question? Are you retarded?
f3d3f6 No.64384
this board gave me cervical cancer
372fd8 No.64390