/femdom/ - Femdom

Why do you assume them to be contradictory?

They are sort of contradictory in that traditional conservatism means traditional gender roles, the belief that women can't be and shouldn't be dominant in any sense.

I'm far right wing, into fascist and monarchist territory, and I can't see myself being with a girl that isn't dominant. There's also no way I'll even associate with a leftist cunt. I fully believe in traditional gender roles, though I also believe in statistical outliers of both genders that are more suited to the role of the other.

I'd consider biting the bullet and finding a normal tradcon girl, basically role play that I'm a normal guy for the sake of propagating the white race and conservative values, but I don't think I'd be able to hold together something like that. Ideologically, I'd be fine with accepting perpetual unhappiness for the greater good, but realistically I don't think the actual outcome would be worth possibly driving that girl to unhappiness and failing to properly raise our children.

In that case, the solution is as follows. Even though the vast majority of women are unsuited for a dominant role in either life or love and it isn't something that should be encouraged, outliers exist who are truly qualified dominant women with conservative views (in theory). More or less, only those outliers could be considered potential mates. If I never encounter one of them, I'll simply live out my days alone and consider my life the most expendable if others worthy of saving are in danger.

>>3297

Letting a woman sexually dominate you becomes more exciting if you, as is typical for those with mostly right-wing views, think that men should typically be dominant and women submissive. The sexual role-reversal is the whole point, really.

>>3302

I don't give a shit about politics, but thanks to you leftypol shitposters fucking around my fetish board, I feel like joining whatever the farthest right 2016 campaign is.

/pol/acks, which one would that be again?

>>3340

If you are talking about mainstream politics…NONE of them. Every single one of them will do nothing to revert the leftist insanity, either because they are puppets and/or because they are actual leftists. Rand Paul is one option you could go with because his (supposed) libertarian leanings would lead him to a smaller government position, which could mean having degeneracy pushed by the government less simply due to there being less government. However, he also voted to fast track the TPP, which would lead to a lot of terrible things like international corporations having the power to sue countries in closed tribunals run by other corporations.

On the other hand, Bernie Sanders actually presents a paradoxically interesting option. He is a Jew that has touted the 6 million non-sense, but he is also a critic of Israel. His economic policies are entirely socialist, but there seems to be an "America first" nationalistic slant to his stance on jobs, infrastructure and being against guest worker programs. His social issue stance is entirely within the realm of standard liberalism, but at least he isn't pushing SJW style white genocide.

Donald Trump is another strange option. He is against the TPP, gun control and abortion, but he is a firm supporter of Israel. Considering he's more or less an actor, you could say that he is Ronald Reagan 2.0. While he looks to be conservative, it really comes down to how much you want to bet that he isn't controlled opposition or that he won't be completely ineffective at implementing a conservative agenda. Then of course, you have to consider that he is a good goy.

So basically, Bernie Sanders might actually be the closest to fascism at least in terms of economics and it's highly likely that no one is going to actually be socially conservative in any meaningful way.

Honestly, we're never going to get a candidate near the election that is far enough right to even hit centrist without a massive social upheaval happening first. The best thing you can do isn't to touch a ballot, it's to become well versed on the issues and extol the virtues of a conservative lifestyle in both word and deed.

>>3341

>/femdom/ - Politics

>>3298

Why do you think they're not? Or are you >>3302?

>>3375

Anti-feminist might just mean they don't believe women should be given special privileges because they don't need them. Feminism is basically about power without responsibility, the opposite of what anyone would want in a dom/me.

I reconcile it by realising that femdom is a fantasy and it doesn't work in real life. I think it's similar to a woman thinking about rape, on a logical level they can see that the reality is shit, but it doesn't mean it's not hot as fuck to fantasize about.

You will be much happier learning to be dominant and then finding a girl that submits to you.

>>3375

the majority of feminists fantasize about rape sooo..

>>3385

>You will be happier if you rip out or suppress a huge part of your personality.

I don´t think that is, how it works.

>>3374

I think this thread would have gotten a lot better of if it had clarified what it meant by "right wing".

>>3390

I think it's pretty intuitive since it's obviously a kind of "right-wing" that contradicts somehow with being into femdom.

>visit /femdom/

>half the threads are still from woman-hating conservatives

This fucking website I swear.

>>3439

>not being feminist means you hate women

I don't have a rare enough Pepe for your post.

>>3439

>woman-hating conservatives

>studies of women's happiness have found that they report being less happy today than in earlier, more conservative decades as well as that women in 3rd world countries with more conservative societies report higher levels of happiness than Western women in liberal societies

>shitskins, which conservatives would bar from entering society, are more likely to assault and/or rape women

Kill yourself, commie.

>That feel when nationalist libertarian who just wants a dom grill to love me like a fuzzy dogie and fuck me angrily and take control but cannot find ;~;

>>3303

>implying you won't be bend over the knee by a nubian communist general to be her bourgeois sex toy

>screaming about how you're an inferior white boy, undeserving of her beautiful ebony body

>implying you won't love it

>>3384

>women are already superior to me why give them an extra leg up?

Makes sense

>>3297

Wow, I'm the same way dude.

>>3444

Wow you're literally me. Too bad I'm a sub too.

Still, I wouldn't expect a dom girl to share my political views. That's not part of the fetish.

>>3297

>My political views thrive on making women into second class citizens

>A woman being dominant is unknown to me

>The unknown is scary and interesting

This is you right now.

having or not having a fetish has nothing to do with politics for fucks sake

>be very right-wing

>can only get off of femdom

Is this normally how it is? though the comments seem to suggest otherwise

Like how common is it that right-wing guys are into femdom? Because Im like that too, I struggle to fap to anything that doesn't involve a dominate woman …

>>3783

Considering the fact, that the animal part of your brain gives a fuck about your politics: Yeah, i would say, that right wingers who are into femdom, are as common as left wingers.

>>3386

The majority of human beings fantasize about rape soooo…

>>3384

>Feminism is basically about power without responsibility

No but that's how you've come to define it so I guess that's correct to you. Like all words it really depends on the context, but most adults would define feminism as correcting historic discriminatory laws to bring the genders more in line with equality. At least in the half of the world that exists outside of facebook and tumblr.

>>3783

It's because deep down you know all your views are wrong and your life is a lie.

What's the hell does being right leaning or left leaning have to do with your sexual fetishes.

Forgive my ignorance but the two things seem entirely unrelated from my point of view.

>>3816

>seem entirely unrelated

Well they contradict… Femdom relvolves around the idea that the female is in control and is taking care of everything and modern feminism is like the worst possible way that could happen. So Its conflicting to be so actively against the bullshit of feminists and the people who side with them ( the left ?), and yet fap to something thats almost the same then when it comes to its fundamental ideas.

>>3818

> Femdom relvolves around the idea that the female is in control and is taking care of everything and modern feminism is like the worst possible way that could happen.

Femdom requires dommes to handle some responsibility for their subs. It also implies that they find a guy so attractive that they take the initiative to actively do things to him.

Feminism is the complete opposite. Women have no responsibility for anything bad that happens (that is always the fault of the "patriarchy"). Also, at best feminism has nothing to do with guys, and at worst guys are villains who are responsible for everything wrong with the world and to remedy that, they should be reduced to 10% of the population.

The only "feminist" femdom out there is among the most unappealing. Findom, aka give me all your money and go away.

I'm not right wing at all but femdom has almost nothing to do with feminism.