No.394
If a board moderator sees this, I have a few questions which aren't covered by the sticky.
1) Are non-explicit images of dominatrices and confident women (like this one) allowed, or should I go back to /s/?
2) Are straight shota and lolidom images allowed?
3) Do images of human females dominating non-human males count as furry? What about human women dominating non-anthropomorphic animals? (I'm mostly referring to illustrations of fantasy animals, not photographs, in this case.)
Thanks in advance.
I'll be dumping some assorted images in this thread, since every other thread seems to have its own specific theme.
No.395
No.396
No.398
No.399
No.402
I do have quite a lot of medical play…
No.404
No.405
No.407
1. Yes
2. Yes (I thought this was apparent from the /ss/ image I used in the sticky)
3. I will answer this after work holy shit I'm almost late I'm sorry
If anyone else has meta questions, post them in this thread
No.408
>>407Awesome! Thanks for clearing that up.
No.412
No.424
No.425
No.426
No.429
No.439
File: 1411507921067.jpg (158.38 KB, 700x933, 700:933, e694ce6ae7d308edd0981b7d64….jpg)

Question to Board Moderator
Are pictures allowed which only feature male pets/slaves, when the topic of the thread is femdom related?
Pic related
No.440
If anyone has any requests for content you'd like me to dump, let me know.
No.441
No.447
>>440Any more cock milking of any kind would be greatly appreciated mate
No.455
No.456
No.457
No.458
No.459
No.460
No.461
No.462
No.463
No.465
No.466
No.467
No.468
No.469
No.470
No.471
No.473
No.474
No.475
No.476
No.477
No.478
>>439I saw another question similar to this somewhere, about selfies. I changed the rules this morning (well, my morning) I adjusted the rules to include content that implies there is femdom going on too. So yes, you can post things like that. The only thing I'm hesitant about is that I want this board to be about female domination, not male submission. At this point though, I think we'll be okay.
No.480
>>394>>407Okay, now that I actually have time to respond, the reason I added the second rule was basically because that's how things went on 4chan. Personally, I was never bothered by actual furry or MLP porn, what I'm really concerned about is the kind of people those things bring to a community, and I'm not entirely confident I want those kinds of people on this board. Not just people who find anthropomorphized animals attractive (or like to see human on animal action), but, you know, THOSE kinds of people. I think anyone who has browsed 4chan for a significant amount of time knows what I'm talking about.
Am I making any sense? Anyway, for now, just post that stuff into /furry/ if they let you. I think once this board really gets going I'll put up a strawpoll asking if people even give a shit about Rule 2 or not.
No.485
>>480I hear you. Nobody wants the board to be flooded by furries and the drama they bring. I'll post my "questionably furry" pictures here instead:
>>>/furry/6106 No.486
>>478Yes i understand. I will try to make these thrads as "femdomie" as possible.
No.601
No.602
No.604
Over at /cuteboys/ there is a sticky with a link to a zeemap in an attempt to foster rabu between cute boys, what about making a similar thing here? A map for dominant women and those that wish to be taken by them.
No.741
No.1034
Are monster girls allowed or do they count as non-human?
No.1091
>>395Man, in the image with the guy with the white hood, she could at least restrain him.