No.1903
I can't be the only one who thought this movie was a chore to watch. It's 3hours of wall to wall expository dialogue, piss poor pacing, and goofy looking superhero's no one gives two fucks about. The sad thing is, I think this could've been a great movie if Snyder actually would've tried to find a way to work the source material into a more cohesive film rather than faithfully recreating every panel and bit of dialogue from the comic. It just seems like all this time and energy was used to recreate the comic exactly as it is on the screen without trying to see if it was worth it.
No.1914
I was a big fan of the comic, and the film was almost word for word of the comic.
I just enjoyed it as a dumb action movie so I did not mind it that much.
No.1919
>>1914Comics and books aren't digested the same way as movies.
No.2012
>>1903I hated it. Picked all of the wrong parts of the source material to adapt and left the spirit in the dust.
No.2013
File: 1412854495577.jpg (238.09 KB, 1600x1200, 4:3, Watchmen-comic-watchmen-52….jpg)
I think it was not a good adaption of the comic, but a OK movie by itself. I do not think the comic can be adapted in one movie like this.
No.2014
>>2013adding, I think Watchmen is unique from other comics because it is very dependent on being a comic. It is aware of the cliches and structure of an American super hero comic book, but to make a film about a comic book about comic books is too detached.