No.87703
Why are women so weak? I'm not trying to bring anyone down or anything, but it really doesn't make sense to me. I had Sambo yesterday and due to a shortage of people, I had to roll with the only female there. I'm no good at judging weight, but she was probably around 140-150lbs. I'm at 185 currently, but I wasn't even using half my strength with her. The only time she would knock me down is when I got sloppy and even then it was easy getting back on top. I've heard it said that women get to be selective, but in the animal kingdom the opposite is usually true with what would be considered rape being the primary means of reproduction. Do women have any evolutionary advantages, or did they get the shit end of the stick? Sorry for the weird question.
No.87706
They were picking berries while men were hunting mamoths
No.87709
>>87703
Women are naturally weaker than men. This has to do with a lower testosterone production in their bodies. I suppose an advantage over men would be better sexual attraction? I'm not sure myself.
No.87713
For an American you sure are pretty bigoted. There are advantages to being both male and female, personally I wouldn't mind being born a woman but comments like yours are a clear example of the hurdles women have to face everyday. The fact that they carry on with their lives proves just how strong they are.
No.87727
>>87713
I second this tho
>>87703
We just simple work that way, our biology gives the man the tools to hunt and to work, the woman gets the maternal part along with multi-tasking and a bunch of minimalistic shit which is scary if you look up into, also, woman are slightly weaker than man, I bet 40% Weaker, the problem is, most gals lost their shit in the past and they don't use their bodies to do strength feats when it's needed, you can see girls doing 1RM with 2.5~3pl8 probably? most of the time I see 2pl8 or 2.5pl8 but they can get that way if applied Natty in a bunch of videos of recognized gyms on youtube, also, they get to carry more muscles in the lower body, when the man is specialized in upper body strength if I'm not mistaken.
No.87732
>>87703
Because they don't need to be strong, we just need them alive so we can fuck them so we do 85% of all the strength shit while they coast on our power for 50,000 years. Same with inventions and building things
Dependency is the default position for a woman, it takes real fucking effort to drag themselves out of that lifelong cosy pillow fort and take responsibility for their diet and actions, hence so few strong females, coupled with all the other reasons mentioned. Plus if they take it too far they end up looking like man monsters and that's pretty niche as a sexual selling point.
Women just need to be fuckable, strength is a variable.
No.87758
No.87759
>>87713
>>87727
Leftypol pls go
No.87768
>>87713
>facts are pretty bigoted
Sounds about right for leftypol
No.87771
think of it this way OP
the human race had 100 points to distribute when God was in the character creator.
men were given 50 points to distribute and women were given 50 points to distribute.
Distributing the points to make men and women exactly equivalent would have compromised the better parts of both. Womens ability to carry children in pregnancy alone probobly costs 25 points and comes with significant disadvantages like mood swings and chronic pain.
Naturally men have to compensate for womens compromised emotional nature by providing strength. Now strength alone doesnt mean the family/race is safe, you must also temper strength with logic, for logic decides when and how strength must be employed.
No.87783
>>87713
Good grief. You sound like a whimpering milquetoast.
No.87784
>>87713
You have to go back.
No.87788
I've read in my book that a study between musclefibers was conducted and female musclefibers are 30% weaker than male musclefibers
No.87789
>>87713
Cuckvarian? Is that you?
No.87792
/pol/ack here. Just out of curiosity, how redpilled is this board?
No.87794
>>87792
I guess quite a lot. Fascism is the only political doctrine that promotes lifting and individualism.
No.87797
>>87703
It's not only physical strength they lack, it's also the basic ability to exert force outwards. Every girl I've trained with in martial arts has been like this, I don't know how to explain it, it's like instead of throwing a punch they're just moving their fist from point a to point b.
No.87798
>>87713
Lol its this fucking bavarian again, aren't you a vegan too? Tell me cuck, is there a vitamin I can take for me fee fees, is so hard ); i cary dem every day!! I AM STRONG TO< WOMYN ACROSS AMERICA@@@@
No.87801
Women aren't providers, simply put. Their jobs, historically, haven't required a ton of strength. And on the topic of rape, compared to other animals (which rape doesn't really even exist for) Humans don't rape that often.
>>87713
nice b8
No.87809
It's funny, there's a girl I work with who fancies herself a gym rat. She's (supposedly) there daily and lifts weights and is proud of (the appearance of) her arm and leg muscles. But every time she needs some heavy lifting done, do you think she lifts the box herself? lolnope. She calls me on the walkie to come save her. And it's not even heavy shit, the largest thing I ever had to help her with was maybe 70 lbs.
I don't know if she lacks the confidence deep down to even try to move the heavy objects, or if she considers calisthenics with 5lb neon dumbbells "weight lifting" and does not actually have any strength.
To answer OP's question
>Do women have any evolutionary advantages, or did they get the shit end of the stick?
Women got beauty and the ability to create offspring, with the cons being physical weakness and irrational brains that base decisions on emotion.
Men got strength and logic, but also the responsibility that comes with those things, and less attractive bodies. That last one is debatable I know, but no matter how aesthetic you are you'll always get less attention than a beautiful female, even from other females.
Extending these traits to societal roles, (attractive) women can get almost anything they want at no monetary (and minimal time) cost, simply by smiling, being nice to a man, showing off a little skin, etc. And if they're willing to put out, they can climb the social hierarchy just by having sex with the right people. That's a pretty goddamn big advantage, considering sex is also, generally, a good time anyway and sought out for recreational purposes in this age. There's shitloads of women in well-paying jobs they're not qualified for, getting by on favors from their male coworkers to make themselves look competent.
Men have to actually put in effort for things they want. Social status, more money, nice things, no woman is gonna provide these for a man just because he smiled at her. He has to provide them for himself by actually learning, improving his skills, and putting in the work hours. And if he's lucky, he'll have some overhead time and money to spend on a woman with the distant hope of procreating. But because men aren't creatures of beauty like women are, you have to impress potential mates with actions instead of appearance. You have to act confident, do things that make them swoon, fend off other men who are interested in the same woman, more fucking work after you've had a long day of work with some work sprinkled on top. Then if you get her, and keep her, you're expected to take care of her for the rest of her life because you're the strong one, regardless of how independent she thinks she is. Hopefully you get one you love enough that your feelings for her will outweigh the everlasting inconvenience.
Men are the physically strong ones sure, but in a world where more and more jobs that require brute force are being replaced by robotics, and women have "equality" and want to be their own person instead of someone's wife, they really have the upper hand. In the first world, our only remaining advantage is that we can still outsmart them with cold logic, and physically dominate them if our survival comes down to it (crazy bitches with knives).
The shit part of this is that our current situation is completely enabled by men. We could go back to the 40's if enough of us wanted to, we could go back to women being exclusively housewives and seamstresses, with the select few who are truly capable rising to some better position every once in a while. What are women gonna do about it? They can't organize by themselves. They can't run small businesses without mens' help. They can't overpower us physically. But so many men are beta as fuck and prop women up for their "courage" and "strength" for simply existing, that the ones who accept scientific fact are the extreme minority and get shot down for being sexist and misogynistic. And the further irony is that the beta shitheads who support womens' independence are only doing it because they're white knights trying to get some pussy and they think that fucking over all men will somehow grant them immunity because they were on the right side of the conflict?
Intelligence is a curse.
No.87811
>>87703
>Do women have any evolutionary advantages
besides the fact that they decide who gets to reproduce and who doesn't? also why would they need physical strength when they can just control men? you may be strong enough to easily overpower a woman but she can actually get other men to kill you.
throughout human history ~80% of women got to reproduce while this number for men is ~40%. I wouldn't exactly call twice the reproductive success "the shit end of the stick".
No.87831
File: 1456675624653.png (387.03 KB, 1440x2560, 9:16, Screenshot_2016-02-28-08-0….png)
>>87792
The BO had to put this up so I think that answers your question…
No.87839
>>87794
Correction : individualism is a wrong choice of words, what I meant was self betterment.
No.87841
>>87831
The BO is a faggot for that. This is a board about fitness. Irrelevant of peoples political view, the slogan should be about fitness.
As for OP
Have you ever worked a manual labour job? Women dont need to be strong because they get men to lift whatever they cant. When i worked in a warehouse the lift broke for a few days. Everything had to be carried up two flights of stairs. It might be the current year but not one female carried anything that can be considered close to heavy. Women have survived thousands of years the way they are because although it might not seem like it, they are fine the way they are.
No.87856
>>87841
It's because people frequently post /pol/ type shit here. Most of us are /pol/acks. The BO is not though, he might be /leftypol/ or maybe not idk. But I really doubt he's a /pol/ack. He meant that board header to be funny. I for one appreciate the BO willing to put up with /pol/acks on his board because I seriously think he's a /leftypol/ faggot.
No.87867
>>87703
>Do women have any evolutionary advantages
they're hot as fuck and basically can mind control men by being cute and smelling nice
No.87869
No.87881
An excerpt from a conversation I had a while back with my Jewish, Israeli friend
>Jewish bruh:Which automatically results in more children, statistically 😀
>Because women usually cheat with males of higher social status, that is.
>Me:Uhm
>Why do women do so?
>It's a statistical tendency that is culturally independent, holds true for all human societies
>So I would guess it's evolutionary
>Offspring of high-status individuals are more likely to inherit traits that facilitate acquisition of status
>Better dads = better children 😀
>Aha, I see
>Poor wives of kings
>Hehehehehe
>Yup 😀
>Can't find anyone in particular to cheat with 😀
>Maybe stronger kings 😀
>In fact
>They often did 😀
No.87882
>>87881
Shit, I thought I had removed the goddamn Smiley faces
Anyway, sorry
I'm Egypt btw, don't know why the flag got recognized as unknown
No.87883
>>87771
Fucking autismo pepperoni, we're all RPG characters now?
No.87887
>>87882
>>87881
you should kill him immediately, not so much for being jewish, but for using smileys like a goddamn faggot tween.
No.87894
>>87727
Men have stronger lower bodies too, but the difference is not as big as in the upper body.
>>87732
>Plus if they take it too far they end up looking like man monsters and that's pretty niche as a sexual selling point.
What if the alredy manly ones are the ones that get so strong?
>>87771
cringe
>>87794
>facism
>individualistic
smuganimegirl.jpg
>>87839
The betterment of the state, not yours.
No.87897
>>87809
Wall of text is correct tbqhbbq
No.87932
>>87887
Well, we were using Hangouts, the smiley face is basically a large grinning bastard that looks cool
Picture the JewishGentleman.jpg but without hands rubbing orhuge nose, same large ass smile though which seems like that of a trickster
No.87933
>>87932
>JewishGentleman.jpg
No.87940
File: 1456744602081.jpg (17.81 KB, 236x329, 236:329, 90a5f4ef4e9e69370476266882….jpg)
>>87894
>The betterment of the state, not yours.
Betterment of the state, through the betterment of the people composing the state. In a fascist society, people are encouraged to surpass themselves and leave weaknesses behind.
No.87950
I read an article the other day about a biologist who calculated that male peacocks are putting just as much energy into their fancy feathers than fancy peacocks put into producing and breeding their eggs.
So what man are not supposed to put into child-rearing they allocate elsewhere.
Remember that back in the day women were continously pumping out children.
No.87951
>>87950
>fancy peacocks
Peahen* are neither fancy nor are they cocks.
No.87968
>>87940
>wanting a big government
Yuropoors will always be slaves under idiots without freedom.
No.87969
>>87968
>wanting a small and ineffective government
Enjoy getting your shit pushed in by those around you.
No.87971
>>87969
Those who sacrifice Liberty for safety deserve neither, and shall lose both. Funny you say I'll get my shit pushed in when Hitler was an aggro retard that got his nation annexed by commies.
No.87973
Men kidnapped and raped only the beautiful women. No man ever raped a woman that can bench press him.
Children only survived if their mom was sensitive, caring, and knew how to keep the man around.
No.87974
>>87971
>Those who sacrifice Liberty for safety deserve neither, and shall lose both.
Freedom is a buzzword that can be used by anyone to suit whatever agenda they have. To a normal person freedom can mean the ability to own guns (which the NSDAP allowed) meanwhile a kike will claim usury is a right which shouldn't be infringed upon.
>Funny you say I'll get my shit pushed in when Hitler was an aggro retard that got his nation annexed by commies.
When you know an attack is coming, the only logical option is to strike first. Nobody would have predicted that Stalin would use his soldiers like cannon fodder.
No.87975
>>87795
>>87794
>>87800
>im expected to believe a fattie and an anorexic beat hercules
>implying fascist arent the lowest tier
lol get blasted fascist weakling.
No.87976
>>87974
>Freedom is a buzzword
Freedom can be objectively measured. People in the US had more objective freedom than people in the USSR.
>Nobody would have predicted that Stalin would use his soldiers like cannon fodder.
Except for the fact that Russia has been doing that for forever.
Hitler had many chances at peaceful expansion (well expansion without war with the allies). After the Anschluss, after taking land from Czechoslovakia and even after the invasion of Poland if he allowed some time for the allies to cool off. The allies were never on the offensive until D-day and Russia alone could have been handled by Germany. Hitler was a shit leader.
No.87977
>>87976
>Freedom can be objectively measured. People in the US had more objective freedom than people in the USSR.
Cite how fascism infringes upon the freedom of the citizens.
>Hitler had many chances at peaceful expansion (well expansion without war with the allies). After the Anschluss, after taking land from Czechoslovakia and even after the invasion of Poland if he allowed some time for the allies to cool off.
We're talking about a country that was economically humiliated on purpose and militarily occupied. The intention of the allies wasn't to stop Germany from expanding, it was to stop Germany from thriving. It isn't a coincidence that a country that rejected the rothchilds was crushed.
>The allies were never on the offensive until D-day and Russia alone could have been handled by Germany. Hitler was a shit leader.
Then Russia attacks first and you've now cornered yourself in from all sides. Nice tactics m8.
No.87981
>>87977
>Cite how fascism infringes upon the freedom of the citizens.
It may not necessarily infringe upon the rights of citizens but the rights do not belong to the citizens. They are at the will of the ruler.
>We're talking about a country that was economically humiliated on purpose and militarily occupied. The intention of the allies wasn't to stop Germany from expanding, it was to stop Germany from thriving. It isn't a coincidence that a country that rejected the rothchilds was crushed.
Of course it was humiliated, it lost an offensive war. That's how these politics work. As for the Rothschild, perhaps successful people make a successful nation.
>Then Russia attacks first and you've now cornered yourself in from all sides. Nice tactics m8.
No, the allies (France and the UK) were not attacking Germany, in fact after the invasion of Poland the Western Front was sparsely defended, France might have been able to march half way across Germany if it wanted. But the allies weren't actually fighting until France was blitzed.
And Russia didn't have intend to take Germany, he made deals with Germany and played Europe like a fiddle to make territorial gains with little resistance. You make the assumption that Stalin would have invaded and ignore the fact that Hitler WAS surrounded due to his own actions.
No.87984
>>87981
>It may not necessarily infringe upon the rights of citizens but the rights do not belong to the citizens. They are at the will of the ruler.
So you don't have an example.
>Of course it was humiliated, it lost an offensive war. That's how these politics work. As for the Rothschild, perhaps successful people make a successful nation.
I'm talking about the treaty of Versailles which was supposed to be a neutral draw.
>No, the allies (France and the UK) were not attacking Germany, in fact after the invasion of Poland the Western Front was sparsely defended, France might have been able to march half way across Germany if it wanted. But the allies weren't actually fighting until France was blitzed.
He was denied peace proposals multiple times before going on the offensive.
>And Russia didn't have intend to take Germany, he made deals with Germany and played Europe like a fiddle to make territorial gains with little resistance. You make the assumption that Stalin would have invaded and ignore the fact that Hitler WAS surrounded due to his own actions.
What is the main goal of a marxist revolution? Lay off the vodka Vlad.
No.87987
>>87984
>So you don't have an example.
When Nazi Germany restricted virtually every right that Jews held I know, I know, Jews aren't people and deserve no rights. But the point stands, rights can be taken away.
>I'm talking about the treaty of Versailles which was supposed to be a neutral draw.
I'm saying it doesn't matter, Germany got fucked in a war, and that's how the world works.
>He was denied peace proposals multiple times before going on the offensive.
Because they were allied with Poland. The allies were real dicks during WWII, don't get me wrong. But they had no intention of fighting.
>What is the main goal of a marxist revolution? Lay off the vodka Vlad.
Marxist revolution ≠ Stalin. Stalin had his own plans and strategy, and there is little to suggest that it involved invading Germany. Hitler provoked people too much and got into shit he couldn't get out of.
No.87988
>>87987
>When Nazi Germany restricted virtually every right that Jews held I know, I know, Jews aren't people and deserve no rights. But the point stands, rights can be taken away.
Jews aren't German. There's no reason why invaders should expect the same rights.
>Because they were allied with Poland. The allies were real dicks during WWII, don't get me wrong. But they had no intention of fighting.
If they had no intention of fighting they wouldn't have tried so hard to antagonize Hitler.
>Marxist revolution ≠ Stalin. Stalin had his own plans and strategy, and there is little to suggest that it involved invading Germany. Hitler provoked people too much and got into shit he couldn't get out of.
That's like saying Fascism=/=Hitler.
No.87997
>>87988
>Jews aren't German.
What about protestants?
No.87999
>>87988
What of the jews that fought for germany in WW1?
No.88003
>>87999
Thank you for your service, go to Palestine.
No.88006
>>87809
So that's why men kill themselves. I needed reminding, tbh fam.
No.88010
>>88003
This is why literally no one likes Germans.
They are all vicious backstabbing snakes who parasitise off the achievements of superior civilizations.
No.88011
>>87809
She actually wants to get close to you and see your muscles flex, because she likes you.
Why are all decently fit men completely fucking retarded?
No.88019
>>88011
That's a generous assumption.
I've had bitches I know for a fact had no interest in me pull that "Lift everything for me" shit countless times (literally countless, we're talking well over a hundred). In jobs where "Ability to repeatedly lift X lbs over the course of the day" is on THE GODDAMN APPLICATION. Bitches just be lazy, brah.
No.88037
>>88019
Bruv, stop being autistic and show off in front of some ladies.
No.88046
>>87988
>That's like saying Fascism=/=Hitler.
>Implying Mussolini, Salazar and Franco weren't fascist
>Implying they weren't a lot more level-headed than Hitler, even though Mussolini had a big head
>Implying Hitler wasn't a nutjob even among his fellow fascists
No.88054
>>88046
>>88046
>>Implying Hitler wasn't a nutjob even among his fellow fascists
lol you germans are brainfucked by decades of post-war propaganda. it's sad that your nation is committing suicide now as an act of repentance. the jews really fucked you over
No.88055
>>88054
It took you thirty words to say:
>ur wrong
>it's sad that your nation is committing suicide now as an act of repentance.
True. It's sad that everything your nation has to show for itself are mooses and that you're not Burgerland.
No.88059
>>88055
>>88054
Anyway: From a libertarian perspective, Hitler was a cunt. You don't even have to talk about whether his war was justified, whether the jews did subvert Germany, or anything like that. His buttfuckery of constitutional rights and procedural guarantees was worse than that of any other fascist regime, to the best of my knowledge, and just a tad better than that of the contemporary socialist ones.
As for his economic policies, Germany was probably doing a lot better than the socialists because Hitler was openly and proudly economically illiterate and let more competent people handle the economy, and because he was dealing with fucking Germany. We are the fourth-strongest economy in the world under our social market policy, we have been doing pretty well under national socialism, and as far as I'm aware, even under socialism, in the DDR, we were a lot better off than the Russians, the Chinese, the Romanians or any other other socialists, besides the Jugoslavs. Germany had periods where it boasted both the best thinkers AND the buffest lifters in the world, not because some manlet with a dumb beard told us to, but because we are fucking Germans and we get shit done.
No.88075
>>88059
so its certified, the cuckvarian is back
No.88082
>>88075
Since when is Bavaria of all things cucked? Only the East is less cucked, but with all the nazis beating up commies and it being a desolate wasteland, it's kind of a WWII-reenactment. If it's any consolation, I'd choose the neonazis over the Antifa every day. In 2013, the nazis set 11 buildings on fire, the leftists did it with 45 buildings. Look it up.
No.88085
File: 1456861560942.jpg (Spoiler Image, 85.12 KB, 540x642, 90:107, tumblr_ntahp10CRN1u9ealmo1….jpg)
>>88082
since it declared refugee seed as it's new cultural refreshment
they have always been a big disgrace, on a cultural, warfare and ethnical scale
also the first ones to surrender after WW2
und HEIL DEM KÖNIG! mmkay
No.88095
>>87703
I was surprised too when I started in the gym
I was the typical guy that is superskinny and has 0 strength so I decided to start going to the gym
I started with a girl I know that looks more or less normal (in strength, weight…etc) and I lifted WAY more than her.
I was very surprised
No.88097
>>87867
What about the fugly ones?
No looks, no strength ¿no intelligence?
I sincerely feel bad when I see an ugly dumb girl, she has nothing
No.88108
>>88085
>since it declared refugee seed as it's new cultural refreshment
As far as the federal government is concerned, that's already our new national beverage. Poor world we live in.
>>88097
She can have a good character. Not that I have seen a correlation between being ugly and having a good character, except on television.
No.88141
>>87771
What he said.
Human babies are complicated and take a high parental investment. The brains have to develop in the womb and learn outside of it. We can't just shit low-quality babies out and cast them to the wind like rats, lizards, niggers, or insects. Human females have to be more specialized and dedicated to incubating babies, and that precludes great strength or physical prowess.
It's a price worth paying.
No.88144
>>87975
That "fascist" in your pic is a Communist.
/leftypol/ is so retarded. Anyone that lived through communism would rip off the head of anyone that browses that board and shit down their neck for fun.
t. An actual Russian and not a commie larper. Also I support fascism.
P.S. No one in Russia liked communism. The sentiment is shared by all other nations that endured it.
P.P.S. cyka.
No.88145
It's a weird dichotomy between insects and mammals though. Generally the female in the insect world is larger and stronger than the male. The opposite is true for mammals. I wonder why that is.
No.88227
>>88144
Thanks for calling leftypol on their shit russiabro.
Though you're still a fool for wanting fascism.
сука блеад
No.88228
>>87856
Fuck off /pol/, we're not all like you retards. You come in here and think you own the fucking board and post your stupid bullshit threads all the goddamn time. You have your own board to shit up, please go there.
No.89363
>>88144
>No one in Russia liked communism.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_the_Russian_Federation
>It is the second largest political party in the Russian Federation, after United Russia.
i get that it only has 92 seats but it is still the second biggest party
>>87794
You are way too retarded, pandering to a ideology that you don't even understand
For examples on why you are wrong, quotes from Mussolini in "The Doctrines of Fascism":
>"Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the
State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the
State, which stands for the conscience and the universal, will of man as a historic entity"
>"Fascism is therefore opposed to all individualistic abstractions
based on eighteenth century materialism"
>"Fascism sees in the world not only those superficial, material aspects in which man appears as an
individual, standing by himself, self-centered, subject to natural law, which instinctively
urges him toward a life of selfish momentary pleasure; it sees not only the
individual but the nation and the country"
In short, being super aesthetic and full of steroids, HGH and insulin is a materialistic view of the body and not a spiritual one
>>87971
>muh liberty
liberty isn't some magical property that comes with small gubmint, a fascist state can be as free as they want with personal freedom
>"The rights of the State as expressing the real essence of the individual. And if
liberty is to he the attribute of living men and not of abstract dummies invented by
individualistic liberalism, then Fascism stands for liberty, and for the only liberty worth
having, the liberty of the State and of the individual within the State"
Just like other many ideologies, the end to materialism and consumerism is a spiritual goal that everyone should undergo. It's not a restriction of liberty.
No.89418
File: 1457777625440.png (52.64 KB, 701x162, 701:162, Ragnar Redbeard on nazis (….png)
Ya'll niggers need to read Might is Right.
No.89440
>mfw fit turns into pol
Anyways going back on topic women are weak because they have less overall muscle mass, smaller cross sectional area and lower muscle density. They also have weaker bones and psychologically are not predisposed to applying what strength they have.
Still this doesn't mean women are inferior they have the strength they need for their role. Evolution isn't about everything being bigger and stronger in fact being smaller is a distinct advantage because it means you need less resources to maintain yourself.
Men and women are meant to have complimentary abilities not compete with one another, if people remembered this we would have far less whining about equality and everyone would be happier.
No.89446
>>87987
>Because they were allied with Poland. The allies were real dicks during WWII, don't get me wrong. But they had no intention of fighting.
That's a bold statement, the allies wanted to curb the power of the 3.Reich, Hitler had no inital intention of fighting them, he even tried to form an alliance with britain which they declined. The allies problem was the general unwillingness of the general population to go to war at all. The invasion of the sudetenland wouldn't have been a proper cause for war, hence the appeasement policy, and even the support for war against germany after the invasion of poland was limited. They entered the war to stop germany from futher expanding, and maybe even effectivley bordering russia, which is why they didn't declare war on the soviet union aswell. It's true that Hitler acted too bold by invading Poland even though the brits and the poles made a diplomatic resolution very hard, he should have been more patient but it certainly wasn't the cause of WW2. And regarding the "Stalin had no intention of invading Germany" statement, it's probably true, stalin though Hitler would keep the peace and had internal problems to solve which ironically the german attack partialy did for him. But you have to keep in mind that for Hitler the threat of a soviet invasion of Romania and the entire balkan was quite real, and loosing these regions would have resulted in a fatal shortage of oil.
No.89447
>>88011
She doesn't, because I tried to ask her out on multiple occasions and got let down easy, and then when she finally said yes she fucking stood me up.
Women are users.
No.89451
>>89363
>liberty isn't some magical property that comes with small gubmint, a fascist state can be as free as they want with personal freedom
Emphasis on *can*, any big government where one leader has all the power is a huge gamble. Sure Hitler wasn't particularly egregious to the average (and only the average) German citizen, but what of his theoretical successors? What happens if we get a power hungry man like Stalin?
Would you rather have liberty held and granted by one man, or in your own hands?
>>89446
>That's a bold statement, the allies wanted to curb the power of the 3.Reich
Absolutely, Britain and France were worried about the balance of power in Europe and of course didn't want Germany to gain power, especially after it attacked them just 2 decades earlier. This is how conflict works, Hitler wasn't a victim, he just lost the game.
>for Hitler the threat of a soviet invasion of Romania and the entire balkan was quite real, and loosing these regions would have resulted in a fatal shortage of oil.
True, but I believe it was his mistake to take Poland first. He could have attacked Czechoslovakia, Romania and Yugoslavia and left Poland to Russia, after they move to annex Romania, Russia might have annexed Poland all by itself, keeping it's pact with Germany. But Hitler would have to give up some of it's lebensraum. That would leave Hitler free to attack the Soviets alone, or fight the allies with the Soviets.
No.89471
>>89440
Being strong is always better than being weak, fucking relativist.
>muh everyone is equal
Women can do things than men can't, and vice versa. Men are still superior as a group if you consider strength (be it physical or mental) and intelligence as your criterions.
No.89472
>>89451
>Would you rather have liberty held and granted by one man, or in your own hands?
This may work with 1% of the population. Your vulnerability to subversion goes through the roof in a "libertarian" or whatever you call it system.
No.89502
No.89504
>people think Hitler was a fascist
He was a National Socialist, not a fascist. These things aren't interchangeable.
No.89507
>>89472
Wrong. With a state, you just need a few well-placed degenerates and you can eventually bring an entire education-system down.
No.89511
>lower bone density
>lower muscle:fat ratio
>shorter height
>broader body structure
they're only weaker because their body is a balance between physical strength and child bearing, whereas the male body is entirely physical strength. doesn't mean they can't be strong, just means they aren't as strong typically as men.
No.89584
>>89504
What's the difference?
>>89511
They CAN'T be as strong
No.90163
>>87713
>everyday
This is what is triggering everyone bro. This kind of stuff is taboo and would rarely, if ever, occur. This is a anonymous board in which taboo things are discussed due to being anonymous. Regardless, this is the main IQ hurdle that you have to cross in order to be a part of this and you have miserably failed. Therefore, eat a dick and afterward shove it up ur arse you "disney morals" supporting white-knight.
No.90164
>>89440
>mfw fit turns into pol
>Muh people can't have opinions that I don't approve of meme
Just go to 4chan if you want filtered content. It's MUCH more active than this shitty board.
No.90168
No.90171
>>87713
>I personally wouldn't mind being a woman
>implying you aren't
You're not fooling anyone. Do you think pretending to be a man makes your opinion more credible?
No.90190
>>90171
She isn't wrong. Well, she is, but because she's a woman. If she were wrong and still undercover as a man, she might at least be half-right. Fully man, always right.
Note to /leftypol/, don't get excited. You aren't fully men.
No.90195
>>90190
>Note to /leftypol/, don't get excited. You aren't fully men.
No.90270
No.90271
Because no evolutionary pressure has been put on women outside of fringe cases like far-far-northern europe where even the women had to git gud and pitch in or everybody froze to death. For most of mankind 80% of women reproduced while 20% of men did so men have been under roughly four times the pressure to git gud or git extinct. Now that we don't need absolute every breeding vessel, you're right, we should start demanding more of women in terms of strength and intelligence… But unfortunately the very material wealth that would enable us to reject women and survive has largely bred men whom refuse to. That is why in NS society there was just as much pressure put on women to be /fit/, to forge a new, better, race of both genders.
>>88228
>You come in here and think you own the fucking board and post your stupid bullshit threads all the goddamn time.
Yeah, welcome to a masculine-male dominated space that is by very nature right-of-center. You say "we come in here" implying we're from outside and you're from inside like a typical psychological-outgrouping libshit blissfully unaware in your signalling that we are and have always been the core demographic of people who actually lift and constantly better ourselves Further, that is never changing because you fucks don't even lift, you're a conglomerate of the weak and the deformed raging against the better and self-bettering.
Stay mad, cunt and/or cuck.
No.90273
>>90271
I'd like social darwinists a lot more if they weren't collectivists.
>inb4 muh tribe
As far as bloodties and their strength goes: mankind < nation/ethnic group < family.
>inb4 politics on muh /fit/
Y-you started ;_;
>inb4 cuckvarIan
Nope. Libertipalatine or something, although that sounds like shit, admittedly.
No.90274
>>90273
Just to clarify: Family beats nation, nation beats mankind as a whole. Didn't want to accidentally greentext.
No.90275
>>90273
>I'd like social darwinists a lot more if they weren't collectivists.
So go build an internet relay and a computer by yourself to post at us if you're so great, what are you? Liberta-
>Libertipalatine
Oh yeah, no sweat, you'll grow out that fluffy idea once the complete impracticality and lack of reality of it grows on you through life experience.
"N-no what if we just ALL agreed to pick better mates! Everybody can just agree to be strong! And then we can all ask the people on the border to AGREE to not let anybody pass and to enforce it as we pay them to buy guns and ammunition willingly! It's theoretically possible so it's practical and doable! If the jews want to infiltrate our banks we just won't use those banks any more! Plus, it surely won't break down after a single generation of contracts dies even if it was somehow done at all! What's a culture? Can you sell it?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcUZrDX5P7A
I was there too, so I'm not being mean or anything. But I was also a literal teenager who had just emerged from leftist programming at the time… So yeah, libertarianism is kind of the in-between "I don't like what's up with these marxists but traditionalism and social obligation still scares me so can't we all just leave each other alone?: the ideology".
No.90279
>>90275
I already had my period of authoritatian programming, so no, I don't think I'll grow out of libertarianism any time soon. Or later.
No.90298
what a fag, in situations like that you just grope the girl
No.90302
>>90279
>I already had my period of authoritatian programming
>Germany
>authoritarian programming
Like what, Merkleism? Bundesrepublik-Vassalism? Native-German-Replacementism? Neverforgetism? Islam?
What on earth authoritarianism does BRD Germany teach?
No.90303
>>90302
>Neverforgetism?
That actually made me kek a little.
But really, Germany isn't as anti-authoritarian as you seem to think. This starts with the way nazis are treated. Their freedom of speech gets raped on a daily basis, with the explicit permission of our highest courts.
Sure, we do get a whole lot of progressivism stuffed down our throats, and we do learn about the merits of resistance and not following unjust laws, but at the same time, extremism and actually acting on your beliefs in the current society are looked down upon, and democracy is regarded as sacred. You can be against the drug war, sure, but if you actually defend yourself against the police seizing your pot, then you're a criminal and deserve to be punished.
From what I gathered from my talks with Americans, you have a completely different mindset than us Germans. While you totally love democracy, too, each and every one of you also secretly wants to be the hero who saves it from the Russians. Not to mention that you guys are ambitious as fuck, or at least the Americans I talked to were. You have an individualist, libertarian, anti-conformist spirit that Germans are missing. In fact, even the idiots who are totally against the establishment, namely the antifa, are collectivist fucktards over here.
No.90309
>>87727
>you can see girls doing 1RM with 2.5~3pl8 probably? most of the time I see 2pl8 or 2.5pl8
The fuck are you talking about huehue? You regularly see chicks benching 250 lbs? What the fuck kinda shit are they putting in the water down there?
No.90316
File: 1458584195916.png (106.55 KB, 273x302, 273:302, I feel things you people w….png)
>>90309
>tfw no bearmode gf who can bench 250
>a mix of thick high-test and toned /fit/girl
Monday is way too soon to be feeling this sorta stuff, bro.
>>90303
>Sure, we do get a whole lot of progressivism stuffed down our throats, and we do learn about the merits of resistance and not following unjust laws, but at the same time, extremism and actually acting on your beliefs in the current society are looked down upon, and democracy is regarded as sacred. You can be against the drug war, sure, but if you actually defend yourself against the police seizing your pot, then you're a criminal and deserve to be punished.
Sounds like once again you need an outsider who is still blood-germanic to be a "le strong leader" for you and break the (((current system))). Shall I start growing out my mustache? :^)
No.90320
>>90303
>In fact, even the idiots who are totally against the establishment, namely the antifa, are collectivist fucktards over here.
Most of what you said is really sensible, fellow palatinate inhabitant, but the antifa isn't really anti-establishment, they're just delusional as fuck and think that our primarily left leaning goverment, with even our "conservatives" being hardly distinguishable from the social democrats or the greens except not looking like they just escaped a circus freak show, is somehow aiding the nazis and supressing the poltical left. Might be because young leftists tend to be naive delusional idiots who, if they not come to thier senses and take a more moderate position, grow up to be castrated cucks. It's not that I just hate leftists, some of their policies are quite sensible, but things like pic related awakens the daunting premonition that the already delusional generation of the modern left will only be replaced by middle class children who never learned the value of self improvement or self disciplin and simply expect everyone else to accept their flaws and naive delusions.
No.90330
>>90316
>Sounds like once again you need an outsider who is still blood-germanic to be a "le strong leader" for you and break the (((current system))). Shall I start growing out my mustache? :^)
N-no thanks, b-burger.
>>90320
>but the antifa isn't really anti-establishment, they're just delusional as fuck
Fair point, my saxon friend.
>things like pic related awakens the daunting premonition that the already delusional generation of the modern left will only be replaced by middle class children who never learned the value of self improvement or self disciplin and simply expect everyone else to accept their flaws and naive delusions.
This about sums it up. It shouldn't be a surprise, really, considering how hard the left has tried to abolish the concept of personal responsibility. I still love my criminology professor for going out of his way to challenge the leftist notion that we are all nothing more than the products of our environment.
No.90335
>>90330
>N-no thanks, b-burger.
Yeah, I guess you're right, we already tried it that way the last time and it failed us so we should leave in the past…
No mustaches! I'll do it cleanshaven this time!
No.90338
>>90330
>Fair point, my saxon friend.
Not the saxon, I'm from the palatinate aswell.
Also, here's another one, I don't even get what they're trying to say.
No.90340
>>90335
But muh 6 gazillion! ;_;
>>90338
>Not the saxon, I'm from the palatinate aswell.
Oops, my bad.
>Also, here's another one, I don't even get what they're trying to say.
Muh patriarchy is bad, and muh penis should not be seen as a status symbol. They'll still insult the size of your dick at every opportunity, thereby acknowledging that a big dick is indeed a symbol of power, but don't tell them that, it will just confuse them.
No.90375
>>87713
Go home Merkel, you're drunk.
No.90395
>>90316
Hitler was BOHEMIAN, that is one of the most german provinces ever created, it even got it's first german university installed there by the emperor of the holy roman empire himself
>>90338
it's just vulgar bullshit "Against Patriarchy and penisfocusing! leftyouth ['solid]
Degenerates
and I am the Saxon