>>88445
>No I think it's BEEN proven time and time again by the thousands of people who base their diet on it.
>Look at my anecdotal "evidence!"
It's been proven by thousands of people who don't base their diet on that as well. Who would have guessed!
Honestly the rest of your post isn't even coherent and it's clear that you know nothing about nutrition or the human body, at least anything that isn't misinformation.
>>88452
>Don't eat sugar because they tell you not to eat sugar!
Do you even know the science behind what you're recommending?
You don't.
>>88485
>Anyone who wants to lose weight and be healthy in general.
Hello, idiot.
>Not to mention the fruits we have now are massively more sugar and calorie dense per fruit than what would have been available to our ancestors
Nutritional content has been dropping for literally centuries due to poor farming practices, these fruits used to be better then, and they used to be even better before.
Honestly, do you even have an article yet alone a study that analyzes the nutritional content of, say, prehistoric fruit, or neolithic fruit? No?
>Secondly we are not chimps our more recent ancestors had a diet comprised primarily (by caloric contribution) of animal derived protein and fat such as meat and fish.
How long did they do it and who are they, if you may?
Why does eating high fat and animal-protein seem to absolutely devastate the human body then? I mean, that's not how it should be if we evolved to eat that way.
>Smarter than guzzling calorie dense carb laden foods that don't leave you feeling full and satisfied which leads to a cycle of feeling hungry and over consumption.
What exactly is calorie dense about carbs? Meat is one of the most calorie dense foods, as well as high-fat foods or additives like oil.
>Infograph
You do realize insulin sensitivity is directly associated with fat intake, right? The infograph only showed their bullshit vs SAD diet which is high in fat (and often protein), which means 55-60% carbs means likely 20-25% minimum fat. That's not low.
Because it's not low, insulin goes up, causing weight gain.
When you remove carbohydrates virtually completely there is much less insulin producing grams going into the body (protein & carbs) thus you produce less despite having a much lower sensitivity level (meaning you need more insulin per g).
If you read what I posted originally instead of had your blinders over your eyes you would have noticed I blamed insulin too for weight gain. The difference is I actually know the science and don't base my eating habits off an infographic, and thus I know that eating actually low fat will result in low insulin production as fat inhibits glucose from entering cells, thus keeping blood sugar high, blah blah blah, increases insulin and causes diabetes. With low fat you get quick transfers of glucose -> less blood sugar spike -> less insulin produced -> less weight gain. With high fat low carb you simply have a gun to your head if you ever eat carbs, a high risk of all the biggest killers in the western world (heart disease, cardiovascular disease, etc) likely poor performance because of a lack of glycogen storage (so you bonk and are tired), and potentially even a sickness referred to as ketosis.
Don't listen to me though, keep believing your infographic and die off from heart disease in a decade or two, natural selection will eventually overtake your kind.
>>88498
How are people on fit this fucking braindead and brainwashed?
If you can't get it that hormones effect the way your body operates, stores, and uses, then just fucking look at what steroids do. Even on the same calories (and nutrition) a steroid user will make more "gains" and gain more weight in general. This is because those hormones effect how his body operates and at what level of efficiency, as well as increases the effective rebuilding time of muscular tissue, but the fact of the matter is that on the same calories he gains more weight, this shouldn't be the case following calories in calories out, as all the extra calories would have been stored as fat regardless.
For fucks sake, if sugar is so bad for losing weight why do professional athletes (such as cyclists) eat huge amounts of it to perform better and stay lean? Why do they often add fat into their diet to ensure they don't get too thin and unhealthy from training so hard?
It's not complicated if you take your head out of the mainstream's ass, the unhealthy obese doctors ass, and the bodybuilding culture's ass. Once you do that you can truly see how fucking lean people are who eat lots of sugar, how healthy they are, and how good they perform.
Wake the fuck up.
>>88510
Again, hormones, insulin, high fat, high protein, that is weight gaining food and generally a recipe for sickness.
Wake the fuck up.