b2c797 No.394
OK so I'm sure you guys saw hw's main post on /b/ last night complaining about moot making his mods provide identification and sign an NDA. So we have everyone on here listening to Hotwheels say moot's going to doxx whichever mod leaks shit or does something he doesn't like.
Yet I just remembered something this morning. Didn't hotwheels fucking doxx the guy who sent in those pedo complaints from cloudfare? Like what the hell?? He doxxes somebody for re
reporting his site, yet he's all speculating about moot, admin of a completely different site, threatening to doxx whichever mod disagrees with him. How the fuck is that consistent?
Like really, Hotwheels doxxes someone who reported his site JUST BECAUSE he got his info yet thinks it's wrong for moot to doxx his mods for leaking information.
That is hypocrisy in the highest.
decf5a No.397
Where did hotwheels state that he thinks it's wrong for jewt to do so?
d35fb9 No.398
Hotwheels didn't intentionally dox anyone.
He just posted the complaints for proof.
aadb94 No.400
>>394Posting a fake email address doesn't constitute doxxing, retard.
dcd275 No.427
>>394I did not see any information that could be used to compromise their financial, business, or personal accounts, nor did I see any information of their that could put their lives in harm as a direct consequence
Listen, I think Hotwheels is a gullible retard at times, but even I admit that he did not "dox" anyone by making e-mails public
The worst he did was act unprofessional and vindictive by failing to respect the privacy of the people who pissed him off
80e6fa No.442
>>394You have tomorrow off, OP.
Finish your homework for Tuesday and stop thinking you have enough critical thinking skills to make an analogy that isn't constructed of soggy toilet paper.
HW enforced his right to confront his (false) accusers. The concern with moot requiring info is that 4chan is liable for its actions, not its unpaid volunteer staff, making the demands unreasonable and unnecessary.
Just shut the fuck up and let the 3 or 4 adults on 8ch talk.
ba0bca No.484
>>394Moot will dox anyone who goes out of line on his moderator team. He literally has done that so many times at this point.
aec604 No.487
>>484point out an example since I don't remember this happening once during my 18 month stint in the hotpocket mines
dcd275 No.579
>>484Wrong
moot and 4chan staff have never doxxed anyone
That story from RalphRetort a few months back about 4chan doxxing a government worker?
It's a blatant lie
None of it ever happened, but Gamergaters insist that it did because one of their spokespersons said it did
They didn't fact check that story, which is ironic because all Gamergaters claim to do is fact check things
Whoops, looks like they intentionally went against their morals to parade an obvious lie yet again!
726190 No.581
>>579>uses gamer gaters>lumps everyone in the same bag>is a retardchecked for shill cunt
dcd275 No.583
>>581What else am I supposed to call these lel epik raid redditumblr retards that flooded this chan with their bullshit?
And be honest, you believed that government worker dox, didn't you?
You claim you're all about fact-checking, and yet you didn't fact check something as simple as this
726190 No.584
>>583>And be honest, you believed that government worker dox, didn't you?
>assumption
>You claim you're all about fact-checking, and yet you didn't fact check something as simple as this
>makes an entire argument blasting me based on assumptiongo choke on a bag of dicks, faggot
dcd275 No.585
>>584Then do you still believe that there was ever a conspiracy to suppress Gamergate by the 4chan staff?
And not them being tired of you sperglords spamming the report button and new threads?
moot wanted you gone because you were an annoyance, not because he was licking Anita's cunt
XOXO was a tech festival, not a feminazi rally like GG has claimed time and time again
Anita was just one of the many speakers at the conference
519e48 No.612
>>585>XOXO was a tech festival, not a feminazi rally like GG has claimed time and time againReally?
4a49c1 No.615
>>585
>he posts blatant disinfo>for freeI understand what's the point of this board now. It's for moot's lapdogs to try to do damage control. Except you are a little late on that.
dcd275 No.620
>>612>cherrypicks one presentation>out of several delivered throughout the conferenceNice to see Gamergaters still lack logic and critical thinking skills just like Tea Partiers
>>615Whoever this mod/jani is was pointing out the flaws in the info HW and a lot of Gamergaters were duped by
But since it doesn't match with the conspiracy-lined view you have of the world, you'll reject it in favor of more convenient "evidence"
Does that sound familiar?
519e48 No.621
>>620>>cherrypicks one presentation>>out of several delivered throughout the conference>Nice to see Gamergaters still lack logic and critical thinking skills just like Tea PartiersThen tell me WHY this shit was even allow in the conference with your superior "critical thinking."
dcd275 No.622
>>621Anita is an established name in the tech circle
She has credibility and connections, mostly thanks to /v/ and the rest of the internet sperging out over her videos
Her fame and power is almost entirely their fault
519e48 No.623
>>622>Anita is an established name in the tech circleShouldn't she have been talking about feminism not trying to brainwash everyone in the audience.
>She has credibility and connections, mostly thanks to /v/ and the rest of the internet sperging out over her videos>Her fame and power is almost entirely their faultActually /v/ didn't really didn't do anything other that tell her to fuck off. She just cherrypicked comments and said they were "misogynist" and the white knights swarmed to her aid like flies to rotting meat.
And this same thing Wu and Zoe did.
dcd275 No.626
>>623Yes, and who exactly enabled them to cherrypick negative comments?
/v/ and the internet is so predictable that a psychotic white man with gender issues can exploit them
Didn't you ever stop and think that this is EXACTLY the type of response they were betting on?
519e48 No.629
>>626Then you should be blaming the nature of the internet not /v/.
You should be blaming the people's refusal to do research into the validity of such claims not /v/.
Why the fuck are blaming /v/?
125ea7 No.631
>>622>Anita Sarkeesian>established name in the tech cirle>she has credibility and connectionsNice appealing to authority. Now how about some actual logic.
Anita is a hipster welfare queen and became "established" by screaming victim when her fraudulent kickstarter campaign was exposed for what it was. She has claimed in past videos that she's not a fan of video games, but demands that she be an authority for what should be in them.
I'm not a Catholic, but I think all Catholics should wear pretty pink tutus and consume all of their medication through their anuses. And if you disagree with me (or don't fund my Patreon,) you're a fucking racist.
Her videos are not her own works. None of the gameplay videos in her "Feminist vs Tropes" are from her playing the games she's depicting. She blatantly steals character art without the artist's permission, despite making money from it. That's theft.
And you are a retard for falling for it. Lucky, there's an easy solution to kill your retardation.
Go find the bleach. It's probably in the sink in the kitchen or the laundry room. Maybe the bathroom.
Pop the lid off.
Start chugging.
Don't stop until the darkness comes.
519e48 No.632
>>631>Anita is a hipster welfare queen and became "established" by screaming victim when her fraudulent kickstarter campaign was exposed for what it was. Well the two requirements are a pair tits and a victim complex.
dcd275 No.633
>>629Because she made bank off of /v/, Twittertards, and Youtubbies and now you're blaming a conspiracy for her popularity
>>631kek, it's like you're blaming me for making her famous in the first place
I wasn't the one giving her all the attention, sympathy points, and feminist street cred by hurling insults at her
I was doing what everyone else should have been doing: ignoring her
The fact that she's know a reknown, established, and near household name in the games industry is the fault of those who gave her words a semblance of credibility
33a9eb No.634
>>631Here, maybe I can help you out.
You have to run a convention. In order to make it successful, you need people to show up. You've got a good premise, but you need funding.
So, in order to attract as many people as you possibly can, you scour the community for who people want to see. You come across Anita and see just how popular the stupid bitch has become.
You book her.
You book her because she'll put asses in the chairs.
More asses in more chairs = more ticket sales.
More ticket sales = more vendors buying table space.
This isn't about politics. It's about money. Nothing more, nothing less.
XOXO got Anita to speak because XOXO wants to do another one next year and, for that, they're gonna need money.
If XOXO was about principles and ethics and GG transparency, then it would have been 20 neckbeards and a half-asleep Stallman and you would have never known it even existed.
dcd275 No.637
>>634Don't even bother with these paranoid idiots
They're never going to listen to anything unless it conforms to their biased understanding of the world
519e48 No.639
>>637All you've done is make dismissive claims and spout ad hominems. I am trying to understand your position yet you refuse to understand my own. How I can I debate someone like you?
f87fa8 No.643
>>585>Then do you still believe that there was ever a conspiracy to suppress Gamergate by the 4chan staff?yup
that's what it's called when you suppress something
f87fa8 No.645
>>634Maybe moot should have taken the microphone and told her to get fucked when she was smearing his website in front of a large audience.
Instead of coming home with his tail between his legs and banning shit she doesn't like.
What a piece of shit.
f87fa8 No.647
>>620>just like Tea PartiersWhy are all of the 4shit mods obnoxious libtards?
4a49c1 No.649
>>647Because Joot hires directly from tumblr and leddit.
4a49c1 No.655
>>585There wasn't a conspiracy. "Conspiracy" means there is something intentionally being covered up. Moot and his mods were very transparent in censoring the GG threads in every board. It was just censorship, plain and simple. No need to involve any conspiracies on this, it's not relevant. The excuses he gave about doing so were easily he refuted in the exact same moment he posted it.
dcd275 No.661
>>655>presents more tinfoilI've had it with you people
It's like arguing with a brick wall
4a49c1 No.665
f87fa8 No.669
d5328a No.770
>>579Actually people largely just thought it'd be funny if it were true. Bout it. It's kinda like the joke about Moot being a cuck, it was based on him being friendly with some people from Gawker.
There's just little point in respecting people that fuck up the boards they are supposed to be running rather than promoting them.
3438c1 No.774
>>770>implying moot isn't in love with that jewesscarrying the luggage of the girl you like is the ultimate beta move, thinking it will score you nice guy points
plus he flew her out to paris, where she posted a pic on twitter of the romantic dinner he attempted
she probably spent the entire time telling him about the college quarterback she fucked the week before
b2c797 No.776
>>427That's pretty much right. I guess I was going off of the whole conspiracy/tinfoil vibe of this board. It's really crappy that he did that though. Very, very crappy and unprofessional. You're not just any anon when you're the founder and leader of a chan. You just don't do shit like that.
>>442Bruh, if you confront them, you send them an email and ask why they reported you. You hear their complaints and give them a response in private. Whether or not it's legitimate, you hear them out and let them make their point. You don't get back at them by posting their complaint on /b/ and be like "lel faget u wot m8 reporting me I'll have you know I won't act like a decent human and just put your stuff online for other people to ridicule"
b2c797 No.777
>>665>posts anti-Semitic tinfoil (emphasizes his religion)>posts pics made to scare people on chans>expects us to believe itthere's an agenda with this post and I know it. you're acting like it's some sort of jewish conspiracy that the guy is a part of. You also don't know what consultant means either. That means he asks him for advice. he doesn't dictate anything, moot just asks him if it's a good idea or not. that's consulting.
>disclaimer: puts that to act like he believes that we don't know his agendaif it's not relevant, than why did you have to put it there in the first place?
>>774>implying you know ecc996 No.781
>>777>not dictating, just consulting>consultingYou're missing the part where they pay him for his opinions. /THAT'S/ consulting.
If you don't think that means that they value his opinions enough to listen to them, when they are literally trading money (Which businesses don't give out for free, you fucking idiot) then you are literally stupider than a brick wall. At least brick walls don't suffer from such basic misconceptions that it nearly stuns other sentient organisms, you fucking retard nigger shill.
>>778>trying to claim a check >post already been madeWow. Fuck you.
7f2a3d No.782
>>655>Waaaaah why can't I post moot's mum dox without getting banned. It's opressing my freedom of speech,I recognize that set mile away.
f87fa8 No.784
>>782>moot treats san francisco hipsters as familythis explains a lot
4a49c1 No.785
>>782This you mean? It's not an actual dox, since there's no address or phone number involved. Jewt just doesn't want more people to find out he's a legit Kike, since so many people used to joke about that all the time.
3b15cc No.786
1c70ff No.787
>>394
>2015>not knowing what doxxing meansjesus christ
6e09e7 No.793
>>583No, because the Ralph Retort isn't a reliable source of information.
As another anon stated back when it was still /burgers/, it's still yellow journalism. Just yellow journalism that's on our side.
7f2a3d No.798
>>785Legit troll, as no one actually posted a dox.
1046ba No.817
>>785> middle name> middle nameIt's called a maiden name; do they not have this in 4plebs' country or something or was the person who made this twelve
b2c797 No.874
>>781>>7851you're just being a /pol/lack asshole at this point. And yeah, they pay him cash for opinions. I pay my lawyer cash for his opinion, too.
>>781fuck you I still had trips and you still checked them.
f1be28 No.880
>>612Just going to link this to point out the similarities. Note the "Unity" shtick and Appeals to the "Common Person". Change out Emmanuel Goldstein with "Misogyny" and I can very easily see the same process occuring.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vvvPZd6_D8>>620
>one presentationJesus H Christ, you're dense…the evidence is RIGHT in front of you, and you can't even seem to realize that there are at least two different speakers present onstage in that pic at different points. One a male and one a female, but sure, keep telling yourself it's just "one presentation". No need to let truth and facts get in the way of your "misogyny and sexism" angle.
>> gb2leddit 33a9eb No.892
>>785That's about as much moot's mom as this is moot's dad. Just because it fits your narrative doesn't mean it's true.
>an oldfag confirmed itIs not evidence.
Marriage records are public domain and online searchable. The "we can't find the marriage record" is proof that these folks are just making shit up.
Just because someone's last name is Poole doesn't mean they're related to moot.
33a9eb No.893
>>892Oh, and forgot to mention …
>>785That woman lives in Colorado.
/pol/ is always wrong.
7f2a3d No.1057
>>892>>893LOL shills keep the damage control running.
Pic related, it's you, get shrekt
33a9eb No.1075
>>1057>the truth is damage controltop kek, jew
moot's actual real mom lives in New York.
Images of a Jewish woman who lives in Colorado are used to prove moot is a Jew.
A shill is someone who pushes a personal agenda. Proving moot is Jewish by giving incorrect information is pushing a personal agenda.
Fact of the matter is this: Elise Cohen Poole lives in Colorado. Conveniently blurring out that fact in the disinfo image doesn't stop anyone from being able to simply google the name "Elise Cohen Poole" and find out how much of a shill you are.