[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / ausneets / flutter / liberty / mde / tingles / vg / vichan ]

/fur/ - Furry

all fur one and one fur all
8chan Cup Knockout Stage - Friday, January 18 at 08:00 p.m. GMT
Winner of the 65rd Attention-Hungry Games
/cure/ - Your obscure board for medical-tan appreciation

December 2018 - 8chan Transparency Report
Comment *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

►►► Get Whitelisted | Rules | Catalog | Log ◄◄◄

| Find & Share | Art | Edit | Literature | Porn |

File: 16e46eae7f0dc0f⋯.jpg (42.76 KB, 500x494, 250:247, oioehkYwE81tya45ro.jpg)


Why is it that god created weird attractions? Like my fucking goodness, I don't want to get slapped in the balls for having a picture of Judy Hopps or Nick Wilde on my phone or something.

My mother would be like "OH! You want to molest a little bunny rabbit girl and fox little boy?!" or something as hurtful as the act of god strucking lighting down onto your mortal soul known as your husky shell in this planet we call earth.


File: e300c0e799996d4⋯.jpg (84.93 KB, 960x960, 1:1, god is real.jpg)




Only children or those with poor memory do not believe in a god. Get a few more years under your belt son



I think Christians derive their deontological ethics (shall nots) from teleology (universe design). Long ago someone thought, "We are designed to have children therefore doing things that diverge from this are bad." Hence, homosexuality and bestiality are wrong, not because of the act, but because they don't produce children. But, I think in some context, they do have purpose. Homosexuality may further social bonding. Bestiality may introduce new genetics into the pool.

I believe in teleoNOMY (the thought that due to complex systems, things only appear to have purpose).

Your attraction to cute animals may be a survival trait among animals. Cute animals are usually cared for by humans. Having a source of free food is great for survival.


File: 9c7b54e53b7b169⋯.jpg (37.01 KB, 480x480, 1:1, no fap retards.jpg)


there is no sky daddy faggot.


File: 2678ddf2400f2fb⋯.png (993.73 KB, 1360x768, 85:48, talktogod.png)


Someone gave me a communicator watch and said I could talk to God with it. What should I say?



"Do you believe in God?"



That's a complicated question, it depends on what you mean, by god.



It is an ontological question. Does existence require creation? If God exists, was God created? If so, who created God?




Yes or no?



It helps no one to be reductive, I believe that, we are here, implies, to some degree, that there are forces larger than us. Now, we can get into the semanticalities of-


Memes aside, I don't really believe in the "found in the bible" version of god, nor any other religion really. They all have something of a similar basis and stricture, that being "worship this god, and by proxy those who lead the church/uphold the word and teachings of this god, or else you'll be killed and/or suffer for all eternity in some specific firey hellscape." Stuff like that was clearly devised in order to obtain power and control over a mass looking for answers.

On the otherhand, however, I also don't really buy the idea that everything just "happened" one day, and all of this just came into being by pure scientific happenstance. So to some degree I do believe there's "forces larger than us" at play.


File: c1cf1474e906366⋯.png (647.41 KB, 1015x573, 1015:573, Brock talks to God.png)


O God the Lord, the strength of my salvation, thou hast covered my head in the day of battle.



I've read, and liked, the notion that the original message was, "the Creator (whatever/whoever you call that) loves you, and you'll have more after this life is through," and the early organized churches realized that modifying it to "the Creator loves you, but you're disconnected for some reason; you can be reconnected, but only if you follow our rules and have us show you the way" could be a vehicle for money and control. They came, they looked at the road, and they built themselves a toll booth on it.


File: dcc57c44ec53fe1⋯.jpg (19.38 KB, 320x320, 1:1, mc gay 1526.jpg)



>[science 40/100] uh, did you try turning it off and on again?

>[speech 10/100] I'm not sure what you're trying to say

>[intimidate] So what if I did, got a problem? toughguy?

>[bluff] (pretend you don't speak english)

>[misdirect] new card, whaddya think?


File: 3faa7a747edd43e⋯.mp4 (1.37 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Spy Kids 2 Gets Existentia….mp4)

>Why is it that god created weird attractions?



>God did it

You created yourself.


Why did God make black people? He obviously knew everyone would hate them, long ago. Was he trying to incarnate or trap evil spirits from another life into an easily-recognizable flesh?


The only thing more funny to me than regular furries with weird kinks are furries with weird kinks and puritanical religions. It's like seeing a closeted senator talking about the ethics of stuff surrounding gays.



post some cub nick and cub judy getting fucked and/or cum inflated if possible



You don’t need a watch. You can just pray bro.

This post was made by the theistic gang



Ummmm, it's actually the influence of Satan? Like, obviously.



Spend two months in a country dominated by Islam. Then come back to the west and bow the fuck down for a follower of a "puritanatal" religion and thank him for not treating furries the way Muslims treat furries.


File: a9a1e71583c389f⋯.png (204.78 KB, 850x400, 17:8, a9a1e71583c389fb4eca735d0c….png)



epic bacon xD



File: 1681e2f5819797a⋯.mp4 (5.36 MB, 480x360, 4:3, Stephen Hawking & Philosop….mp4)


>If all parties agree on the reliability of an authority in the given context it forms a valid inductive argument.

Well, okay, let's look at who Francis Bacon was, and whether he is considered a "reliable authority": https://infogalactic.com/info/Francis_Bacon

>English philosopher and statesman, who served as Attorney General, and as Lord Chancellor of England. His works are credited with developing the scientific method, and remained influential through the scientific revolution.

>Bacon has been called the father of empiricism.


<Empiricism is a theory that states that knowledge comes only or primarily from sensory experience. It is one of several views of epistemology, the study of human knowledge, along with rationalism and skepticism. Empiricism emphasizes the role of empirical evidence in the formation of ideas, over the notion of innate ideas or traditions; empiricists may argue however that traditions (or customs) arise due to relations of previous sense experiences.

<Empiricism in the philosophy of science emphasizes evidence, especially as discovered in experiments. It is a fundamental part of the scientific method that all hypotheses and theories must be tested against observations of the natural world rather than resting solely on a prior reasoning, intuition, or revelation.

<Empiricism, often used by natural scientists, says that "knowledge is based on experience" and that "knowledge is tentative and probabilistic, subject to continued revision and falsification." One of the epistemological tenets is that sensory experience creates knowledge. Empirical research, including experiments and validated measurement tools, guides the scientific method.

>His works argued for the possibility of scientific knowledge based only upon inductive and careful observation of events in nature. Most importantly, he argued this could be achieved by use of a skeptical and methodical approach whereby scientists aim to avoid misleading themselves. While his own practical ideas about such a method, the Baconian method (https://infogalactic.com/info/Baconian_method), did not have a long lasting influence, the general idea of the importance and possibility of a skeptical methodology makes Bacon the father of scientific method. This marked a new turn in the rhetorical and theoretical framework for science, the practical details of which are still central in debates about science and methodology today.

Okay, so Francis Bacon is the one who created the entire scientific process that is used today to determine what we consider to be "factual".

But, then again, the guy died almost 400 years ago. what about more recent figures? Well, there's William James, the first educator to teach psychology in America, and considered to be one of the biggest influences on philosophy.

>The turbulent billows of the fretful surface leave the deep parts of the ocean undisturbed; and to him who has a hold on vaster and more permanent realities, the hourly vicissitudes of his personal destiny seem relatively insignificant things. The really religious person is accordingly unshakable and full of equanimity, and calmly ready for any duty that the day may bring forth.

But, then again, Stephen Hawking said that Philosophy is dead, so no reason to ever use any philosophers as a source. Oh, how about Alexis Carrel, the Nobel Prize winning French doctor who pioneered all of today's vascular suture techniques, the use of antibiotics, and organ transplants.

>Prayer is the most powerful form of energy one can generate. It is a force as real as terrestrial gravity. As a physician, I have seen men, after all other therapy had failed, lifted out of disease and melancholy by the serene effort of prayer. … Prayer like radium is a source of luminous, self-generating energy. … In prayer, human beings seek to augment their finite energy by addressing themselves to the Infinite source of all energy. When we pray, we link ourselves with the inexhaustible motive power that spins the universe. We pray that a part of this power be apportioned to our needs. Even in asking, our human deficiencies are filled and we arise strengthened and repaired. … Whenever we address God in fervent prayer, we change both soul and body for the better. It could not happen that any man or woman could pray for a single moment without some good result.

However, he also believed that cells in the body could divide indefinitely, so I guess that makes him an unreliable source.


File: aa69151bf1d77f0⋯.pdf (7.34 MB, Modern Man In Search Of A ….pdf)



How about someone who actually has done extensive research in the field of psychology and helped hundreds of people with proven methods, such as Carl Jung.

<During the past thirty years, people from all the civilised countries of the earth have consulted me. I have treated many hundreds of patients. Among all my patients in the second half of life-that is to say, over thirty-five-there has not been one whose problem in the last resort was not that of finding a religious outlook on life. It is safe to say that every one of them fell ill because he had lost that which the living religions of every age have given to their followers, and none of them has been really healed who did not regain his religious outlook.

Or, does he not count because he dared to call out Freud for the hack that he was with trying to found some way to explain and justify his mother complex?

I guess, in some ways, there is no "valid sources", so we might as well be quoting complete nobodies, such as the psychologist Henry C. Link: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.264624/page/n5

>My return to religion was not due to the depression, although that trying period served to project certain facets into holder relief. It was not due to old age and approaching senility which often play strange tricks with the mind; ... My return to religion was not due to misfortune or to disappointments with the affairs of life; ... Indeed, there has been nothing sensational or dramatic in my conversion, if I may call it such. There was no great experience, no emotional cataclysm, and no dazzling revelation, which marked the change of which I write. The change was a gradual one, of which I was for a long time unaware. It was due entirely to the routine experiences encountered in the practice of my profession, psychology.


File: f8b3eee7abd1f75⋯.webm (8.12 MB, 480x360, 4:3, Only believing what they ….webm)




However, all these people have talked about is whether religion is important, not if God actually exists. But, isn't that a faulty argument to begin with in the first place? You cannot prove that something doesn't exist:


Therefore, anyone trying to say that "God doesn't exist" has already shot themselves in the foot. However, what one can say is, "Is there evidence showing the existence of a God?" That's the question people should be asking.


File: 0ee5543dd8fe891⋯.gif (3.63 KB, 80x190, 8:19, 25054370_p0 - チードルさん.gif)




Save it for /christian/ or /r/atheism bud.


File: d86f41d2d7c75a1⋯.png (424.99 KB, 2884x4400, 721:1100, Roman Catholicism 1.png)

File: aa8bd0cf108d0ef⋯.png (424.39 KB, 2884x4400, 721:1100, Roman Catholicism 2.png)

File: 9c4f9cd975e8e98⋯.png (427.29 KB, 2884x4400, 721:1100, Roman Catholicism 3.png)

File: 2ba3ca612cc524b⋯.png (417.32 KB, 2884x4400, 721:1100, Roman Catholicism 4.png)



Wasn't that board conquered by the Catholics, and the fags who reside there are even further up their ass than the usual followers (Which isn't really saying much)?





You missed the entire point you nigger, claiming god exists just because some authority says so does not constitue evidence, next time read the fucking links, even if they are from wikipedia.


File: 55732e526ed8450⋯.png (1.06 MB, 1360x768, 85:48, talktogod2.png)


But...I don't...have anything to say. Here, n-now you can talk to God!


just accept your a pedo anon

[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / ausneets / flutter / liberty / mde / tingles / vg / vichan ]