No.431553
Seen a lot of stuff in the catalog, but figured this might be needed. Post anything Straight that is fappable!
No.431579
>>431553
>straight
>first pic is literally lesbians
wew lad
No.431594
>>431579
Straight in this context means intended for straight viewers.
No.431597
I miss old Wolfynail. His earlier stuff was so good. What the fuck happened?
No.431678
>>431597
Never saw any of his old stuff before. Any examples?
No.432628
gotta keep this thread alive so it can be seen by more people!
No.432631
cmon, people, I know there's more stuff out there!
No.432632
last ones I got for now, hopefully when I check back whenever that is there will be some new stuff in this thread! people ARE in this thread, right?
No.432642
>wants straight
>first post contains gay art
Niiiice.
No.433462
No.433463
>>432642
And thats not gay, thats lesbian. Thats straight as fuck if you ask me
No.433467
>>432642
No girls on the Internet.
No.433488
>>431553
>1st img
>Straight
lol
No.433495
>>433488
Are you doing the same in the straight part of pornhub? Like "Ew, lesbian is not for straight people!" while the majority is straight and male
No.435377
>>431680
You have more of that comic?
No.435383
No.435425
>>433495
how about making an actual statement instead of an ad homined through trying to make him look immature
No.435436
>>435425
Not that guy, but it IS an immature statement. In 99% of circles that post straight port they include lesbians, as the primary consumer of lesbian port is straight people. Arguing anything else is just semantics.
No.436717
Looking for a grey cat, black hair with a vibrator, I've been looking all over for that image but I can't find it, help?
No.436937
Keep the dream alive, SFur!
No.437093
>>436937
That's what we are here for, my man.
No.437095
>>Youre gonna need more details than that, if I had to guess. That sounds pretty generic as of the description you have now
No.437807
Gotta be some lurkers out there
No.437810
I'll come back later and see if anything that isnt from me has shown up, that would be fantastic
No.437835
>>433463
>>433462
>>433495
I'm just confused why a homosexual picture is on a straight thread, let alone being defended by straightfags.
>'in this context means intended for straight viewers'
But there is nothing straight about it, it's a clear image where both individuals are of the same sex. That's homosexual.
If that is not a clear an obvious clue to a person in denial, then I am not too terribly sure what is.
No.437858
>>437835
Jesus christ, man. It has been established, not just in this thread but also in millions of others across the internet, that straight dudes, which I am assuming are the ones that would come to a thread marked "S Fur General", enjoy lesbian porn. This is a thread for straight porn, yes. and I know that this is beating a dead horse because it has indeed already been stated many times, but in this context the lesbian porn is meant for straight viewers. Because, as stated previously, straight guys like seeing lesbian porn. Which is why it is here. Even though it is technically homosexual. Would the pictures of just females with no males not be considered straight in the way you are thinking as well? Because I think we both know that would be ridiculous.
>person in denail
Not sure what there is to be in denial about
No.437920
>>431553
In that third picture, in the seventh panel, it looks like a black man in a gas mask.
I am sorry that is the only thing I have to contribute to this tread.
No.437951
>>437835
For fuck's sake. Straight doesn't refer to the content, it refers to the viewer. Why is that so hard to understand?
A male viewer looking at solo female, f/f, or m/f content is straight. Threads with this content are straight threads.
A male viewer looking at solo male or m/m content is gay. Threads with this content are gay threads.
Female viewers can be discounted as rare enough that the categories do not need to worry about them.
No.437959
>>437858
>Not sure what there is to be in denial about
How about that a straight man finds homosexual acts appealing? You can argue all you want, but justifying why same sex images is appealing to heterosexuals is pretty ridiculous.
No.437965
>>437959
>A man being aroused by two women means he is attracted to men
What is going on inside your head?
No.437967
>>437959
>>437951
It's a complicated issue.
Would herms or whatever combination of genitalia count as straight? No, of course not, don't be a faggot, but there are tits and a vagina there.
Straight means that a straight person would like it but also that there is a distinct vanilla female in there.
No.438038
>>437959
>homosexual acts
>between two women furries
>men like these acts
>means… ???
holy fuck the mental gymnastics are making my head spin.
Damn son..
No.438131
Hey what do you guys get off to moslty? For me its comics and stories (like flexible survival)
http://strawpoll.me/6153480
No.438167
>>437920
He works for the mercenary.
No.438276
I am straight and I don't like giant dicks, cum, or innie vaginas
>>437959
Lesbians are homosexuals
Straight men like females. Two females in the same place doesn't make the boobs and booty disappear, dog.
It's a straight male thread you fucking autist
>but it just said STRAIGHT not STRAIGHT MALE omg shitlords XD
AUTIST.
No.438340
>>437920
No, it doesn't.
Also, what the fuck are you smoking and where can I get some?
No.438397
I think the reason why this thread is here might be getting overlooked, let me try to get us all back on track
No.438705
I'm cursed because I usually can't get off to single images. Where is the context?!
No.438717
>>438705
Who were you trying to reply t
No.438909
give me le guide for drawing le sfur pls
No.438922
>>438705
Fuck, did you never play the Floor is Lava when you were a kid? The hell is wrong with a little imagination.
No.439109
>>438705
gotta say which image you were looking at, i probably have the others
No.439370
keepin this thread going. I've been busy, but ill keep updating it as much as I can. Anymore people got anymore stuff out there, that would be great too. Any lurkers?
No.443085
>>438340
I can see it too. You have no imagination.
No.443100
>>439374
Please tell me you have nicole r34
No.446357
>>432630
>tfw no cute blind girlfriend to get comfy with
No.447262
>>432630
>>432628
Is there more of these two?
No.450855
>>446357
I never knew she was blind.
The things you learn…
No.450879
This thread needs more love
No.450885
>>443100
I do, first one here>>450879
No.450887
No.450935
>>439370
sauce on second pic?
No.464152
>>439370
sauce on second pic?
No.464176
No.466998
>>466845
whoever put this up, thank you
No.467009
>>431553
>girl eating another girl out
>"straight"
No.467012
>>467009
there was literally a massive discussion on this about midway through the thread.
No.467013
No.467221
>>466998
What will a blowjob from a beaked creature be like?
No.468022
>>467013
Not if you are a female viewer…
No.468502
>>467221
In reality it would suck, but not because of the beak. Bird mouths are quite dry, and some species even have a bone in the tongue (parrots mainly IIRC)
Good thing this is all fantasy!
No.468566
>>468022
so if you have a picture of 2 baras 69ing, its "straight" if the person looking at it is female?
No.468618
>"S fur"
>literally the first picture is lesbians
>thread full of solo female
No.468622
won't someone please think of the women that browse /furry/
lesbians and naked women alone do nothing for me
No.469427
>>468622
how is it not obvious that S Fur is supposed to mean "Shit that is appealing to straights"? Obviously straight guys like lesbian and solo stuff, so OF COURSE those will be in a S Fur thread..
No.469428
>>468566
In this context, I think its pretty obvious that the viewer is assumed to be male
No.469625
>>468618
>wants to see dicks
>comes to an sfur thread
No.469639
>>431579
>>467009
>>468618
There are no girls on the internet.
Now let's get some quality non-gay content on this board.
No.469849
>>469749
>>469802
>HAHA LOOK AT ME I'M INSTIGATING XD
No.469881
>>469749
>Wanting girls to be here
Get.
No.470047
>>469639
I like the way you think, anon
No.470049
>>469802
>>469749
Oh, fuck off
No.470640
>>469625
Gay furry porn doesn't do anything for me either, which makes up 99% of /furry/ porn threads.
I wanna see penises inside vaginas. How hard is this to understand?
No.472521
>>470640
not at all hard to understand, anon
No.472714
>>472521
>2nd pic
where's the cock
No.472919
No.472926
>>472919
is the first reply to it fam
No.473612
No.473677
No.473799
>>437858
Actually, I despise lesbian porn. Especially when it's real women. It's fucking awful. Strapons can make it better but their fake moans kill my boner. I'd say traps were cool but they're even more disgusting. Futa or strapon sex in art is the only way I'll enjoy lesbian porn. There needs to be a dick involved otherwise it sucks. No male/male though.
No.481104
No.483752
>>481016
I like it… but theres just something.. off with these 3D models
No.484068
>>469427
See, this is why I call my folders Ffur and Mfur.
Ffur means the focus is on the female.
Mfur means the focus is on the male.
Certain pics can be in both the Mfur and Ffur folders, of course.
No.484073
>>484068
what about things that are exclusively male or female in content?
what about things like herms, dickgirls (tgirls), cboys (tboys)?
No.484104
File: 1454004766182.png (288.87 KB, 920x918, 460:459, 1117854_Delicious_muhammad….png)
No.487504
No.488347
>>481016
>3d furry
>looking good
usually they fall into the uncanny valley but this ones looks really decent, artist?
No.495990
Damn, I started this thread last semester, and it's still around…
I'm so fucking proud.
What a discussion this has raised!
Let's keep it going.
No.496007
is it worth supporting jay naylor on patreon? it's my favorite artist art-wise, but recent stories have just been about cucks, and i have no idea how active everything is anyway..
No.497309
>>492412
4 pictures, 1 cock.
25% score
F
>>493535
4 pictures, 1 cock, 1 dildo.
37.5% score
F
>>495990
4 pictures, 1 cock.
25% score
F
Personal score of 50% for female POV, still an F though
>>496796
3 pictures, 3 cocks, 1 toy, 3 ponies.
0% score
Turbo F
No.497314
>>497309
why does NOBODY in gfur thread ever complain about solo male?
why is a straight thread full of complete and utter faggots?
No.497322
>>497314
Nobody complains in gfur because it's assumed everyone there is gay, people complain in sfur because it's assumed everyone here is male.
No.497323
>>497314
3 pictures, no cock.
0% score
F, didn't even try.
>>497322
Basically this.
No.497324
>>497323
>F, didn't even try
I was hoping it would trigger you.
No.497327
>>497324
Didn't really trigger me, you basically posted nothing.
No.497331
>>497322
please refer to >>437951
>Female viewers can be discounted as rare enough that the categories do not need to worry about them.
there aren't that many females on this board to explain the massive shitposting in this thread
No.497335
>>497331
So which threads do rare occasions like me go to to find primarily straight porn instead of lesbian/gay garbage?
No.497336
>>437951
This is entirely wrong.
No.497395
>>497309
lololol is this like a meme or something
here, I have about 63 dicks in the last picture, making my penis:image ratio 12.6 giving me a 1260% score, ayy lmao
No.497610
>>497395
5 pictures, ~70 cocks.
0% score, didn't show your work.
F
No.497701
>>497395
>>Human
See me after class….
No.497723
>>497335
here's an idea; make your own damn thread, it's not fucking hard.
here, I'll even write the OP for you.
>"straight thread: girl friendly edition"
>"at least one male and one female per picture"
>bump your own thread with content, don't be a faggot
>let other anons contribute
and there you go, you got your own super special thread, just for you.
I swear, this must be an elaborate troll from the fagfags of the board trying to haze us. if it is, their meme game is strong. I can see this shit catching on
it's totally believable too, only a female could be this much of an entitled self-centered faggot
No.497765
>>497723
It's not very entitled and self-centered to tell other people to stop being so entitled and self-centered.
And the problem with making a thread separate from normal sfur threads is it could cause both threads to be half as populated as this one is now, which is already low activity. There's also the problem that threads can't enact 'local rules' like what you suggested, so anyone who just sees "straight" can go in posting tittymonsters with no cock involved and mods wouldn't care.
Also I'm being entirely fair here, if someone were to come into this thread and post gay porn I would use the same scoring system.
e.g.:
4 pictures, 0 vaginas.
0% score.
F
I very much appreciate the advice but I honestly don't think it's going to work anon. Unless I saw some actual support for the idea it's just going to be Thread In Which Only I Post which would be pretty pathetic and downright embarrassing. I'm not going to experiment.
No.497775
>>497765
look, if m/f is what you want, just sack up and make a thread for it.
it's fine. nobody has anything to lose.
we already have a MILF, straight scalie and various other with straight threads with plenty of content. there's no competition at all.
if you make a thread, I'll even contribute, as long as you cut it out with this 'it needs a man to be straight' shit and never bring it up again.
No.497781
>>497775
I can't promise that last part, but it should be easy enough to just delete the thread and start over if it gets shat on.
No.497788
>>497765
>I don't want to create a thread for asinine reasons, better to just shit up the current one
165 words, 0 arguments.
0% score.
F - consider suicide, fag.
No.497905
>>497765
>And the problem with making a thread separate from normal sfur threads is it could cause both threads to be half as populated as this one is now, which is already low activity
This entire thread you have been complaining that you can only get off to pictures with males and that female-only pictures don't belong here. Then someone tells you that instead of coming into an established thread and demanding everyone change to suit your tastes, you should make a new thread. This proposed division would still be exactly the same as what you have been demanding - i.e. m/f in one thread, f/solo and f/f in another - and you complain that the activity would be too low. It's the EXACT same solution you proposed, with the sole exception that the new thread would be for m/f instead of exclusively female, but you reject it.
The suggestion is pointless anyway. It all belongs in sfur, be it m/f, f/f, or f/solo. Your "logic" requires that m/solo wouldn't belong in gfur; if a solo female cannot be considered heterosexual, then a solo male cannot be homosexual. But something tells me the gfur threads wouldn't like it if the m/solo got replaced by f/f, which is, after all, homosexual and thus belongs there.
No.498136
>>497775
I'd be happy to see a thread like that. More content is good. Perhaps cock anon should add some content.
No.499525
>>498136
>>497905
>>497788
>>497781
>>497775
>>497324
>>497765
>>497723
>>497610
>>497395
>>497336
>>497335
>>497331
>>497327
>>497324
>>497323
Holy god in heaven, this is fucking gold.
OP here again. Thank you to all the shitposters who have made this thread fucking hysterical. As a reward to everyone, I'm going to do what I originally came here to do and that is…
No.499546
>>499525
Did you enjoy the images I posted at least?
No.499614
>>497905
I never said m/solo doesn't belong in gfur. That's one thread that solo porn caters to exactly everyone. f/solo would make great content for a lesbian thread, but not a straight thread where the content is supposed to cater to two groups of people.
also the whole "gay = lesbian" argument is dumb semantics shut up lol
No.499646
You never said it, no, but it IS what your logic would require
No.499649
posting straight porn in a straight porn thread
No.499662
>>499614
But that's exactly how you cockfags started the argument: "lesbians are gay, get the fuck out of my straight thread". >>432642
No.499682
>>499649
>eliza's lady parts on show
I'm so fucking tiggered
No.499727
>>499682
He paywalled it too. And his claims of wanting the Eliza nudes to be leaked ring hollow when you consider he started emailing his art to Patrons to get around yiff.party.
I'm just as disappointed at how minimal they are as at them being shown at all. It looks hastily tacked on, which absolutely does not do justice to such a big reveal.
I thought it was a fake until I compared it with a screencap from the stream when he was drawing it, and even then I was sceptical until he indirectly confirmed it was really a leaked version.
No.499786
>>499727
>teases Eliza for years
>it's literally a fucking line
9000 hours in MSPaint
No.499894
>>499662
Nice collectivist argument ya goof.
No.500106
File: 1456357206866.jpg (82.65 KB, 724x786, 362:393, 8091e627903960986f17fea01a….jpg)
>>499662
Don't you guys get bored of this shit? Every single sfur thread the same fucking arguments.
I'm getting really tired of this board and I can't believe I have been browsing it for almost two years now. Too fucking bad all the alternative boards are dead or dying because none of us filthy masochists won't leave this shithole.
No.500126
No.500169
>>500126
>>>/kemono/ could use more posters as well.
No.500248
>>500169
Not everyone here is /kemono/ tho
>>500126
I was gonna post something like that later. Oh well.
>>500106
In all seriousness, see >>500126
If we have our own board that isn't dedicated to 100% porn dumps, we'll have much more to do.
No.500256
>>500248
>Not everyone here is /kemono/ tho
I know, but it would be nice if someone came to visit every once in a while.
No.500259
>>500256
I think the lack of activity comes from the way we divide ourselves. We seem to divide ourselves more on the aesthetic (furry, kemono, x species, y fetish…) rather than by our alignments. That's why I created the board to begin with. To bring us all together under a tailored board that didn't try to blanket everything by being too in general and accepting. It didn't take off as lively as I hoped because I was tight on time and couldn't be there to help pull it along 100% of the time, but I think the time has come for us to consolidate.
No.500419
>>500259
What exactly does that entail? Gotta get specific here if you're more than just talking, anon
No.500422
>>500259
I'm sure paying us a visit every now and then won't be too much of a problem.
No.500433
>>500419
The main idea was for us straights to pack up and leave /furry/ to somewhere else where we didn't make up less than 10% of the threads that we forced ourselves to post only inside of. As you can see in this thread, we aren't a very welcome minority in this board if we have people trying to shit up what little threads we have here.
No.500462
>>500433
>we aren't a very welcome minority in this board if we have people trying to shit up what little threads we have here
Are you suggesting that the people shitting up this board wouldn't also shit up a straight board? It's not the gfur fans that are doing the complaining, it's people with different definitions of straight, which will carry over. Unless you're suggesting it's some kind of false flag by the gays in these threads.
No.500477
gee it sure feels like /b/ here
No.500486
>>500485
>straightfags
>straight fags
>straight fags
>heterosexual homosexuals
>heterosexualhomosexuals
No.500563
No.500565
>>500504
now you have to reupload all this crap again!
:^)
t. puppysky
No.500654
IM JUST GOING TO POST PORN AND NOT BE A FAGGOT, YOU KNOW, IF THATS OKAY WITH EVERYONE.
No.500696
>>500486
You're either reddit or a newfag, neither is acceptable.
Lurk moar; if you are from reddit either stop going there completely or go back and stop using 8chan completely.
Tim to make your choice. Those are your 2 options.
No.500780
>>500462
Back during the halfchan sfur days, we determined it was false flagging by the gays. It still seems to hold the same today. Look at their posts. None of them ever post straight porn to the thread. You can even look at other straight oriented threads as well. Some gays go out of the way to make a scene. When we are left alone, hardly anyone complains about what a straight thread can and can't have.
No.501001
Why even bother doing that shit though? It's not like they HAVE to even come in here
No.501003
File: 1456495645398.jpg (129.86 KB, 1200x911, 1200:911, tumblr_mvv9tj2OM51t02mtdo5….jpg)
>>500654
Who is the artist that did the cute mouse pictures? I cannot tell from the file names.
Keedot pic as payment :D
No.501473
>>501001
Why they do it is beyond me. True, they don't have to do it, but they do it anyways. Apparently, it is too much to ask for them to just leave us alone, so that's why I decided to go make the new board so we could isolate ourselves from the drama.
No.501539
>>501003
I got no idea, anon, I apologize.
Have some other pron as repayment
No.503088
>>500106
I remember >>>/sfur/ being pretty good, but it wound up dying because so many furries are literal faggots.
No.503201
>>503088
my god, the threads there are fucking ancient!
No.503205
>>503088
by the way, you got any more horse girls? 'ppreciate it
No.503223
>>503088
I think >>>/sfur/ may of also died because all people ever did on it was dump porn, got bored because nobody did anything else, then left. I know there is a good number of us to populate a board on our own, we just need more things to do and expand upon. This is one of the main goals of >>>/fukemo/ .Otherwise, we are left with a boring community that only wants to look at pictures.
No.503236
>straight thread
>dicks everywhere
If it's not my dick, it's not straight. Fucking cucks.
No.503243
>>503205
who is the artist on the third pic?
No.503251
>>503236
It's straight if the penis is feminine, though :^)
No.503325
>>503243
i wish i knew, anon.
>>503236
cant believe you got a slight kek out of me you faggot
No.503389
>>503236
It refers to the characters, not the viewer. People who think it honestly refers to the viewer are hopelessly retarded. Imagine if you were a female posting in this thread; would you complain about it being full of females and therefore constitute as "lesbian" because there's no males, because supposedly the thread is aimed at *you*, the viewer, and not the characters? No. your logic is inconsistent. If 2 females fucking is "straight" to a male, why isn't 2 guys fucking considered "straight" to a female? Again, thread orientation original posts are referring to the characters, NOT the viewers; a male fucking a female is straight porn. I can't believe I actually have to type this out for you people.
>If it's not MY dick, it's not straight
Even if this is a shitpost, how autistic can you get? Let's follow your logic:
>If it's not a first person view of me being swallowed, it's not vore
>because a character devouring another character doesn't count because the art isn't about the characters, it's about me
>unless the vore is about me, the viewer, which the art is supposedly directed to, it doesn't count as vore
>therefore, artwork of a character devouring another character is not vore
You are figuratively THIS retarded. This is the logic you arrive at when you honestly believe the art is about the viewer and not the characters.
"Sfur" is being misinterpreted. We should come up with a new categorization for labeling orientations and their allowed content. Something like:
Gfur: Gay furries, male-on-male
Lfur: Lesbian furries, female-on-female
Sfur: Straight furries, male-on-female
Bfur: Bisexual furries, art of a character fucking/being fucked by both sexes. in the case of a threesome/orgy, the character's sex in their placement while fucking is key here: it should be either M-M-F or F-F-M, the one in the middle must be fucking/getting fucked by both sexes, otherwise if you have F-M-F or M-F-M it's not bisexual, because the two characters on the outskirts are having a straight fuck with the opposite sex, while the character in this middle is straight and just fucking/getting fucked by two of the opposite sex at the same time.
No.503643
>>503389
furry is niche enough with it being further segmented into tiny pieces. Besides, agreement on this issue was reached a long time ago in this thread. You are literally repeating words and phrases that have already been said
No.503644
>>503389
and come on, you fell for that bait, HARD
No.503780
>>503236
>>503389
weew! masterfully baited, friend. thanks for keeping the thread bumped.
bumping with more straight content.
but seriously, >>503236 has the right idea. patrician tastes right here
>>503389
except that you're wrong, and you've been proven wrong multiple times across threads.
'Sfur' isn't being misinterpreted by anyone except you.
go ahead and tell Xtube, Pornhub, and literally any other repository of smut there is that their gay and straight categories are wrong and let us know how well the discussion goes for you.
maybe instead of trying to redefine porn categories already firmly established and used for decades, we should give a sub-category to the austistically specific thing you're looking for.
luckily, it's a thing already. it's called female friendly straight porn - the wheelchair access of porn categories for just one of those off-chances a female visits a porn site built by males, for males who just want to see femmy tits and ass and are only mildly tolerant of dicks.
No.504752
>>503780
i like you anon you have the right kind of ideas
No.504852
>>503389
>"Sfur" is being misinterpreted. We should come up with a new categorization for labeling orientations and their allowed content.
No, it's quite simple for anyone who doesn't have a big stick up their ass.
Sfur is f/m, f/f and solo f
Gfur is m/m and solo m
And that's it. If you have something more complicated like a threesome, you just use common sense and go on a case by case basis.
No.505103
Does anyone have the animated version of the first one? It seems to have dissapeared from the internet after that faggot decided to go full hitler on all the pumzie uploads on e621
No.505107
>>504852
f/f is not straight, its lesbian.
I like how you put f/f as straight but didnt label m/m as straight considering female anons.
Nice hypocrisy
>>503780
>I'm not wrong, just look at the opinions of a bunch of irrelevent websites
Come back when you have a decent argument
>muh no female porn browsers
Dumbass. You have been proven wrong time and time again but you feel the need to validate yourself through the approval of a group census of idiots who are also wrong.
No.505119
>>503780
>very few women browse online porn at all
>1 in every 3 porn site visitors is a woman
Yeah ok, whatever you say…
No.506190
>>505119
Sounds like 1 in every 3 porn site visitors is a liar.
No.506235
>>505107
dude, holy fucking shit.
Are you trolling or actually this fucking stupid?
So, pretend I am the internet porn industry.
Would you actually go up to me and tell me that my Xart, xtude, xnxx.com, pornhubs, nudevistas, ect. are all actually putting gay porn on their front pages when they have two women in it? No, they consider that STRAIGHT PORN because they reference the GENERAL MALE VIEWERSHIP OF THEIR WEBSITES. You completely and utterly ignored that particular point of the anon you were responding to, I noticed. Go on, tell every single porn site they have their categories wrong. Christ, man, how the fuck can you be so goddamn dense?
No.506241
>>505107
dude, holy fucking shit.
Are you trolling or actually this fucking stupid?
So, pretend I am the internet porn industry.
Would you actually go up to me and tell me that my Xart, xtude, xnxx.com, pornhubs, nudevistas, ect. are all actually putting gay porn on their front pages when they have two women in it? No, they consider that STRAIGHT PORN because they reference the GENERAL MALE VIEWERSHIP OF THEIR WEBSITES. You completely and utterly ignored that particular point of the anon you were responding to, I noticed. Go on, tell every single porn site they have their categories wrong. Christ, man, how the fuck can you be so goddamn dense? \
No.506244
pissed me off so much i somehow doubleposted
No.508411
>>500491
>>500696
We're already on reddit, guys.
No.508425
>>506235
>>506241
Actually, you are objectively incorrect.
Shut the fuck up and apologize, you stupid piece of shit.
You're worthless and your opinion is worthless.
You're completely wrong. f/f is homosexual.
It's gay porn. It's lesbian porn.
No.508445
File: 1457585028967.png (1.12 MB, 1100x1554, 550:777, 1585477 - Final_Fantasy_XI….png)
No.508530
>>508425
>It's gay porn
Go post f/f in the gfur threads here (or anywhere else for that matter) and tell me how it goes.
No.508722
>>508425
Then, please, go post f/f in a gfur thread. That is literally the argument you are making. And dont try to weasel your way out of this fucking challenge, I want to see a goddamn response to this, otherwise you admit that your argument is based on, at the very least, a fucking double-standard.
No.508744
No.508754
>>508425
>>508722
>>508744
>>508733
close, but not quite there, honey.
we didn't tell you to make your own G-fur thread, you were supposed to post your gay lesbian porn in these pre-existing threads.
>>477914
>>387637
>>386733
No.508760
>>508754
Darn.
Well, I'm not too thick to know when I've lost.
I tried though. Oh how I tried….
No.508768
>>500696
>implying I'm a newfag or a ledditor
Aww, you're making that irrelevant response because you feel uncomfortable about your insecurities!
>"I'm going to find some random person in some random thread on /furry/ and call him a newfag redditor!"
No.508769
No.508771
>>508760
I dunno anon, You classified it as gfur and nobody complained so.. You kinda won I guess?
(I know they asked you to post it into a Gfur thread, but it was obvious they just wanted you to do it so you'd get dogpiled by angry gay males)
No.508772
>>508771
Well, I wasn't gonna go fuck up a gay-male thread with women.
That'd just be rude to someone uninvolved with this whole silly argument.
So I had to do it myself!
No.508774
>>508772
well exactly, that's pretty much what I was saying
No.508778
>>508774
Yeah, but I could.
If I really wanted to, I could, and it'd be valid.
It'd be gay, at least. Although I think I'd need to post butch lesbos, rather than cute girls getting felt up by other cute girls.
No.508780
>>508778
I understand that, but let's be honest with ourselves here…
You'd still probably get dogpiled by angry gay males
No.508781
>>508780
I'm not gay, so that's fine with me.
Yay for not giving a fuck about penis vs vagina.
I just love snuggles and getting naughty with cuties. ~<3
No.509149
>>503644
Man, what I would kill to spend a night with this chubber.