No.496901
>giraffe character
>doesn't have a long neck
No.496909
>lizard character
>has boobs
No.496910
>fish character
>lives out of water
>bird character
>has hands
>snake character
>has arms and legs
>equine character
>has feet not hooves
:^)
No.496913
>>496901
Wow, that happens more often than I thought.
No.496919
>horse character
>doesn't have a horse dick
No.496921
>>496919
>dog dicks on anything that isnt anthro dog
No.496923
File: 1455821564620.jpg (131.43 KB, 905x1280, 181:256, 1433550890.frostibunni_ima….jpg)

>>496921
I'm okay with this.
No.496924
>>496921
>Dog dick
>Human pussy
No.496927
>Non-equine
>Has equine pussy
>Tfw I don't like equine pussy while every other autist on the planet does
Please kill me
No.496928
>>496924
>horse dick
>human pussy
>>496927
sorry about your shit taste
No.496933
>>496928
>Talks about shit taste
>Frogposts
And for the record, I don't MIND horse pussy as long as it stays on a goddamn horse
No.496937
File: 1455822663556.png (218.54 KB, 992x1280, 31:40, 1411697666.mayawhite_mayaw….png)

>>496933
I don't mind horsepussy / dick on everything !
No.496945
>>496937
Filthy fucking degenerate
No.496968
File: 1455826289227.jpg (237.28 KB, 600x1001, 600:1001, 1407036138.cerberus_sweate….jpg)

>Sweatshirts / T-shirts on deer
>Impossible to wear headphones round neck bearing no relation to characters ears
>Taurs - just everything is hopelessly impractical
>Knots on every species
>Human dick on anything TBH
No.496975
File: 1455828059431.jpg (164.15 KB, 1024x1068, 256:267, some_good_clean_fun_by_cat….jpg)

>>496968
>>496968
>Taurs - just everything is hopelessly impractical
Hey, it's not our fault that society is bipedal-biased =3
No.496986
>bird character
>doesn't have cloaca
>mermaid
>legs in a sleeping bag
>pig character
>obese/hyper fat
>slob/literally wallowing in their own shit/hyper scat
>cow character
>giant boobs
>giant boobs and udders
No.496991
>>496968
Convince me that human dick + horse pussy isn't da bestest.
No.496999
>>496913
>Puzzle used to have a long neck and fucked her brother in some admittedly hot comics
>now she has a fucking short necks and bangs just about anybody
Goddamnit.
No.497003
No.497006
>otherwise cute character
>60ft horse cock
don't get me wrong i love 60ft dongs as much as the next guy in certain contexts but sometimes it can be disappointing.
No.497008
File: 1455835122540.png (552.26 KB, 1280x1233, 1280:1233, 1442158046.foxosexual_zehp….png)

>tibetan fox
>has antennas
No.497009
>the character doesn't 100% resemble the animal it is.
No.497012
>>496975
where did taurs even come from
i mean we can blunt anthros down to 'generic trope throughout history and robin hood in particular' but what the fuck modern media has had taurs in anything but a traditional mythological context?
No.497013
>>496921
What started this thing? I remember very little old art with dog dicks on non canines but now I can't go 5 images without seeing it
No.497014
>>497003
also,
>walking on two legs and talking
No.497019
>>497012
Well that's the things, taur characters aren't exactly common and I think they really only took off after that one fandom started, chakrens or something? They were a cat taur race made up entirely of herms, which you can see their lineage show up with most taur characters being herms
No.497027
>>497025
>species: Panther/wolf
>only wolf part is the penis
Why does this make me so angry? I don't understand
No.497041
>>497013
>What started this thing?
almost certainly raw laziness combined with people being more interested in things being vaguely animalistic and unique than accurate.
same as every species being a dog with slightly different ears. (/r/ing the image that shows this, by the way.)
No.497045
>>497012
Someone pondered "Should I make this character more human, or more feral?"
and a voice inside their mind inquired "why not both?"
No.497047
>"hybrid" character fox+something
>Takes one single small trait from one species (like raccoon tail or deer antlers) and is otherwise just a generic fox
No.497092
>>496909
>anthro character
>has boobs
No.497095
>>497045
>This animal's head looks boring.
>I know, let's put half of a human there instead.
No.497099
>Sheep, alpaca or some other thing with a very specific fur texture
>Zero fur detail, just looks like coloured skin.
Why do artists just skip effort on things that matter?
No.497104
>>497024
Otter's are hot and otter dicks are gross, and dog dicks are great, specifically sheathes and knots, but dog dicks on otters are wrong.
Sheathe is fine and never wrong, but I'd rather it just be a human dick inside if it's not on a dog.
No.497110
>Feral dog
>Has human dick
No.497111
>>497047
>giraffe character
>isn't giving me a massage
I know, right?
No.497112
>>496968
>Human dick on anything TBH
>being a zoofag
>being gay
No.497116
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>497104
>dog dicks are great, specifically sheathes and knots
No.497131
>>496909
>>497092
>is not an "anthro character" but a serious attempt at making an alien species
>is based on a lizard/snake/other reptile
>has boobs
>clearly has a mouth incapable of suckling
No.497139
>mouse character
>has a canine muzzle or no muzzle at all
>rat character
>almost always drawn as disgusting sleazeballs
Liking rodents is true suffering.
No.497164
>>496968
>>496975
>Taurs
>No enlarged and/or disfigured-like cranium to allocate enough brain mass to actually work with six limbs
Scientifically-credited and everything, I'm afraid. At best we should expect xenomorph-shaped heads to make that possible!
No.497179
File: 1455855755569.jpg (Spoiler Image, 556.71 KB, 1000x667, 1000:667, otterdong.jpg)

>>497104
I don't see how otter dicks are gross, or at least any grosser than dog dicks.
No.497183
>>497164
Ah yes, because clearly ants require an unusually large brain mass to work six limbs.
No.497184
>>496975
Logic is biased against taurs too though.
The more you try to make them work, the more messy the rocket equation gets.
Remember that thing, right?
More mass (an extra humanoid upper body) that needs to be carried means stronger propulsion to be able to move the whole thing effectively, which means more energy reserves to fuel that movement (larger internal organs for a start), which is yet another extra mass, etc.
And don't even get me started on the digestive tract and redundant organs.
No.497187
>>497164
>Brain mass being the determiner of intelligence
>Not the density/number of neurons
If you are going to spout scientific bullshit at least try to sound right. You'd need a stronger brain than just for the limbs, you would also need it for the extra organs (or lack thereof if you see the dicks that taurs take)
No.497190
>>497139
>mouse character
>has a canine muzzle or no muzzle at all
>Liking rodents is true suffering.
'Struth. I don't get the obsession with canines. Technically, rodents are more closely related to primates than canines are, which makes then MORE anthropormphic than canines. They are our evolutionary cousins. Rodents are seriously underrated.
No.497207
>>497179
Huh. That really wouldn't look half-bad if it was stylized into a smooth texture like dog dicks are already.
No.497210
>>496910
>>497131
I'm very guilty of this.
>>496986
Most birds don't have unique male members though. Cloaca kissing would be boring as fug. Two holes are fun too.
No.497227
>>496968
>>496968
agreed
if you want to take it step further
>Anthro character with full coat of thick fur
>Wearing anything except maybe something small to cover genitals in public
wouldn't you be way too fucking hot
No.497235
>>496975
>4 tits
>preggo
>hate taurs
>mfw
No.497242
>>497210
>Most birds don't have unique male members though.
I like feral anatomy, at least with females. Hens are top tier.
No.497247
>>497210
what if cloaca kissing was awesome tho. Or what if u shared a deeldo.
Then it's p hot. It's a shame poop comes from there, that's not hot.
No.497250
Most of this stuff doesn't really bother me. I prefer characters when they're exaggerated a little and less realistic. They stand out to me more and I find them much more memorable.
Of course, some things like giraffe neck thing bothers the shit outta me.
No.497255
File: 1455864776633.png (700.82 KB, 700x851, 700:851, 9fc1b5e19374582c2493646f69….png)

>>497041
>same as every species being a dog with slightly different ears. (/r/ing the image that shows this, by the way.)
You mean this?
No.497311
>>497183
AFAIK their heads are oval and lengthier in the back exactly because of that.
>>497187
At the hour I was too sleepy and couldn't recall
if that was the reason, but thanks for fact-checking, based anon~
No.497320
>>496901
>>497250
I think it's because if they were humanoid the long neck would not only be impractible, but probably not even physically possible on such a small and upright body.
No.497343
>>497013
Pretty sure that humans with dog dicks fucking each other with some hilariously convoluted mpreg politics is a thing on tumblr. Omegaverse?
No.497345
>>497320
Pretty much, I'd imagine the artists probably tried the long neck and couldn't get it to look right. They seem to generally make them overall tall to compensate. And it's not like they don't have other distinguishing features anyway.
Giraffes are pretty cool, really.
No.497348
>rat character
>looks like a dog with a weird tail
>bear character
>looks like a dog with round ears
>bird character
>feathers look like fur or sometimes even just skin
>bovine/cervine character
>has a horse penis
>human genetailia on ferals
No.497352
>complaining about fictional humanoid/creatures traits
>expecting hyper realism
No.497353
>digitigrade legs
>tail-less anthros
No.497354
File: 1455897174806.png (Spoiler Image, 146.44 KB, 625x626, 625:626, pictureveryrelatedsogoahea….png)

>>497352
>not shitposting about the small stupid erroneous things like the rest of us
>expecting anybody to actually ever be satisfied with anything ever
>trying to be the one guy who preaches the obvious answer because he thinks he is smart/correct
>pic couldn't be ever more related
No.497356
>furry anthro OC donut steel
>has body hair on top of fur
>scalies also having body hair ever
No.497363
>>497354
>>497354
>implying that I'm not shitposting too
No.497365
>>497190
Anything that isn't and canine and maybe a feline gets shafted in some way.
I get the appeal of dogs and cats, but there are so many amazing animals in the world. If furries stopped drooling over knots for 10 seconds, I'm sure they could find an animal they like better than wolves.
No.497390
File: 1455900591727.jpg (309.4 KB, 1240x1754, 620:877, 086a625924610b3cfe332a6aaf….jpg)

EVERYTHING IN THIS FUCKING PICTURE RIGHT HERE
No.497523
>>497012
>where did taurs even come from
Original was probably centaurs; Chakats came from there afterward in the 90's
>>497184
I think you mean the square-cube law
——-
>shark anthros
>furless dogs with ears
No.497555
>>497356
>clearly defined fur on body
>has oily skin shine
No.497567
>"Anthro" character
>Only anthro from the neck up
>The rest of the body looks painted on
No.497580
>>497555 (checked)
>Furry OCs having hair anywhere, especially on the top of their heads
No.497589
>>497580
Only exception to that would be lions and other animals with manes, imo.
No.497693
>obviously furry, even has a sheath
>sex happens
>A FUCKING HUMAN DICK COMES OUT
Why.
No.497721
>>497580
I like it. Sure it makes no sense, but it makes them more human.
No.497742
>bird character (or just about any species in this case)
>has separate wings and arms
I don't get bothered by most things. Most any other design choice, including colors or designs, are certainly questionable at best but still dismissable.
But this, however, strikes a particular nerve in me. Strikes it hard with a quick blow to the head, cracking open the skull and sending a shock wave that resonates throughout every fiber in the body
No.497746
>>497693
Because human dicks in sheathes are hot.
No.497752
>Tuars with dicks in both places the parts they're made of would have dicks
>Also, reptile/amphibian characters with external testicles
No.497784
God forbid people take creative liberties with characters that exist only in fantasy
No.497790
>>497784
They should only take the creative liberties I want them to take.
No.497795
>>497742
Tell me about your opinion on gargoyles then, anon
No.497796
>>497721
Why do they need to be more human? The appeal for most is that they aren't human
No.497864
>elephant character
>has a one inch trunk
>bear character
>thin
No.497941
>>497390
Jesus christ anon.
No.497951
>>497941
Well I could be more exact and say
>lapine without buck teeth, or even ANY teeth for that matter
>nose colored just like the fur around it instead of the skin color, pink in that case as we can see from the inner ears
>blush going to the eyes and inside the mouth, how even
>popularizing your clearly OC Donut Steel reference from a SNK Playmore character while pretending it's all from his own mind
>then do the same thing with a MLP tat because everyone else is doing it
>barbie anatomy
>skin-textured furcoat
>Google-fished background with a few blurring filters
>mismatched genital with species
>horrible art quality in general (lazy to be more specific at this point, just use your eyes already)
>etc. etc. etc.
But I still think think that "EVERYTHING" covers it up
No.497969
>armadillo character
>fully flexible rat tail
>no armour shell at all or just different coloured skin
>ears are a part of the shell
>clothing OVER the shell (???)
>shell on forearms/legs
I can forgive the shell on the arms/legs but damn everything else
No.497981
>>497969
I meant under the shell, woops
No.498076
>>496999
I get the feeling it was because people wanted her to kiss their donut steel and he couldn't figure out how without making the neck look awkward so just went 'fuck it' and gave her a short neck.
No.498099
>>497796
I think it involves, something something science, biology, and being just human enough to be perfectly fuckable.
I like my girls with hair too
No.498118
>>496901
is this in general or something specific?
No.498142
>>497742
Dude griffins lmao
No.498143
>>496901
Oh it's time for the autistic zoophile shitpost thread again I see, I got my sage ready.
>>497354
>Pretending to be retarded
>Ever
No.498268
No.498313
>>497951
His art went to shit after he hopped on the mlp bandwagon. I dont know that I've been able to bear following him anywhere else since, because he STILL draws mlp shit.
He's also an unbearable fucking edgelord
No.498912
>>496919
>Any animal character
>Has a human dick
These are the same kind of people who put ketchup on steak
No.498931
No.498955
>>498931
>Liking something that looks like an animal is weird
Where do you think we are
No.498960
>Bat character
>Wings are attached to the back rather than the digits
I have nothing against Rouge the Bat, oddly enough
No.499008
No.499031
>>498960
It's about design. Rouge pulls it off mostly with the cartoony aesthetic and a kinda devilish/succubus theme. That and everyone's used to it. (that and she's generally portrayed as basically human with an animalish head and wings)
It's in the more… detailed furry designs where aspects like that look weird. Then again, it's hard to win; full on arm-wings are unwieldy at best unless you're going for a full harpy look, while back wings kinda bring up weird angelic/demonic overtones.
Oddly griffins/gryphons and hippogriffs are one case where the six-limb morphology makes sense, but you rarely see it. Same with dragons.
No.499083
>>499031
>that and she's generally portrayed as basically human with an animalish head and wings
No.499093
>>497390
>>497390
>rainbow dash cutie mark
No.499138
>scalie character
>doesn't have gazongas
No.499198
File: 1456174710110.jpg (Spoiler Image, 356.38 KB, 1000x1481, 1000:1481, 1449168088766-0.jpg)

No.499199
>almost impossible to find normal furry art anywhere outside of fat category that isn't just some shitty porn but rather tries to be somewhat normal
Is there no decency left?
>>496968
What, do you think some theoretical furry universe suddenly doesn't have button/zipper-closable shirts? Clearly the faggot that draws those shitty comics imagines things that way just so his shitty fursona can be shirtless all the time with that gay little collar.
>>497104
>>>/zoo/ you filthy cretin.
>>>/suicide/
>>497131
>all these people ITT asshurt about breasts
How dare furry not be entirely for faggots?
>>497227
It's called being civilized. Put some clothes on faggot.
>>497796
Because not every furry is a zoophile like you, degenerate.
>>>/gaschamber/
No.499206
>>499199
people who complain about breasts are dorks tbh
No.499336
>>499199
Wow! You are one angry and opinionated little guy, aren't you?
I get it, you're just another one of those cookie-cutter /pol/ retards that (huge surprise) thinks anyone with tastes or opinions differing from himself should be axed, or gassed, or whatever edgiest verb is fluttering through his mind at the time. Have you ever had a single original thought, or do you just spew insults at random with hope that eventually you'll have the good fortune of stringing together something legible?
I hope you grow out of this stupid shit soon, for your own sake.
No.499353
>>499199
You have to go back
>>>/pol/
No.499399
>>499199
>Implying you wouldn't be thrown in the gas chamber yourself for being a furry
No.499867
>>499093
Well that just takes the cake
Rainbow Dash fags are terrible even among bronies
No.499940
>>499199
THIS POST UNACCEPTABLE COMRADE
OFF TO >>>/gulag/ WITH YOU COMRADE
No.502184
>Human-like/Human-shaped character
>Fur; Claws; Slit-irises; Tails; Fangs; Scales; etc.
Hue.
No.502661
>>497752
>Nagas with stomach dicks
No.502766
>My character
>Doesn't have crippling depression, social anxiety, lingering thoughts of suicide, complete lack of employment history.
No.503010
>artist's gallery is 100% 'SFW'
>still draws shit that makes him hard
Just draw actual porn, you chucklefuck. That General audience advisory doesn't fool anyone.
No.503024
>>497752
>>502661
>Nagas with stomach dicks
>Nagas with stomach vaginas
This shit drives me nuts.
In the most coherent fantasy, taurs have their junk where their animal counterpart would, since that's the part that's lower. Not with nagas though, which leads me to ask: did the original creators of nagas know nothing about snakes, or are the artists who portray them now the ignorant ones? The entire length of a snake is 'the body', they have very small tails, meaning that "tail" nagas are slithering around on should be full of guts every bit as much as a horse taur's lower half.
For a naga to have their junk the same distance from their shoulders as a human, would still qualify as having genitals on their chest.
No.503025
>>503024
The original creators were ancient greeks. They aren't something some furfag invented in the past 20 years like sergals.
No.503087
>>503024
Considering that many ancient peoples called snakes "evil" I don't think anyone wanted to get close enough to find out. Though nagas are divine beings in Hindu myth.
No.503092
>>503024
What if nagas aren't actually snakes, but snake-like humanoids with long tails
What if nagas are alliums
No.503097
>>503024
couldn't she have a snake vagina? you know, like the real animals have?
No.503099
>>503097
The sad thing is that people do give them cloacas, they just put them in the wrong area. Naga porn with correct cloaca placement is pretty rare sadly.
No.503114
>>502766
You must be doing something wrong because mine sure does.
No.503136
>>503114
>>503114
I tried to tone it down so he could go on adventures with his friends while still being relatable as a self-insert.
I failed miserably when I realized how hard it is to strike a balance between realism and practicality in adventuring, plus it's been so long I don't even know how to characterise friends anymore. I can't even tell if anyone I've ever considered a friend was actually my friend, but I don't want to admit defeat and make him friendless.
No.503138
>>499199
I'm so sick of you. It's not anything about /pol/, it's not anything about your tastes, it's the way you always format your posts in every single thread.
You quote about a dozen posts in each thread you reply to. This could be acceptable if you were the OP andd/or replying to a wide conversation, but you're opening conversation with multiple posts. I can't see this being right on any website, much less an imageboard. You're also sure to add an empty line after each quote.In addition, you add multiple links to other boards like >>>/faggot/ and >>>/killyourself/. This would be fine if it wasn't in every post like this.
Finally, it's littered with landmines of things that are politically incorrect. There's literally nothing wrong with having these views, but you purposefully throw them in your post for the sole reason of calling anyone that disagrees with anything you say a "triggered SJW kike cuck degenerate".
TL;DR kys attention whore
No.503193
>>499199
>all these people ITT asshurt about breasts
How dare furry not be entirely for faggots?
yet you would complain and bitch if a male character wasn't anatomically correct get out of here you hypocrite
No.503204
>Shark/cetacean character
>Dorsal fin is on their head and not their back
No.503207
>>499199
If this is bait it's breddy gud
No.503483
>>503099
>Naga porn with correct cloaca placement is pretty rare sadly.
That is sad, because it would be more beneficial to nagas then horses or any other taurs. If you could move your genitals anywhere independent of the rest of your body, suddenly a LOT more crazy stuff is possible.
No.503486
>tanuki character
>normal to small sized balls
It's like you are missing the point entirely.
No.503914
>Shark character
>Has hair and/or ears
No.503926
>>503914
>look up shark and some other tag
>don't mind the hair, it can be pretty
>bear the ears, at least they're still sharks
>click another image
>it's literally just a dog with a shark tailfin
No.503928
>Furry character that isn't a bird
>Has wings
>Has neon colors
I don't know what bothers me more, tacked on wings or just neon colors to make your self look "different"
No.503931
>>503928
Pic related. No neon colors though
>>503926
I want to see what you're talking about.
No.503933
>Hyena characters
>They look and act like dogs
No.503934
>>503931
I try to get all kinds of sharkperson porn, but one day I'd noticed I had no traps, so I went on e6 to find some. There was only 3 pages of "shark girly", and at least one page worth was filled with this kind of shit. Makes me mad as fuck. These ain't sharks. They don't even have cute triangle teeth.
No.503937
>>503934
Holy shit.
You weren't kidding.
No.504100
No.504114
>>503934
Wait, those aren't canines?
No.504138
>>503934
It is physically painful to see what furry artists will call a shark these days.
No.504142
>>497693
Because furries are a mix of animal and human traits.
No.504144
File: 1457028729295.jpg (118.62 KB, 545x640, 109:128, 78a168d7d1d656885072db2058….jpg)

I absolutely hate it when an artist draws a character with human lips when it's anything but a human. I fucking hate anyone who draws this ugly thing.
No.505275
I can't stand it when people keep drawing furries where all males are bald but all the females get all the shiny fabulous hair
Stop it with that, okay
No.505277
>>504144
If it's only the (reasonably sized) bottom lip, I see no problem with it
No.505290
>>504144
fuck the lips, that whole muzzle and headshape is fucked. only recognize the character because of the color.
No.505337
>>504100
That image is probably older than you are.
No.506267
>foot paws as wide as the furry's torso
No.506282
>>496910
The last one is honestly the worst
No.506287
>>504144
I hate it when an artist is not on-model or even somewhere close to it.
I get that there's a wide range of interpretation for something like Animal Crossing but do the 1st image instead of the second
No.506295
>>506287
If you're gonna go off-model then you might as well go all the way with it
No.506487
>>497255
Ironic that picture left the ears out on sharks when almost every shark furry has fucking donkey ears
No.506585
>furry male has a lovingly rendered animal penis, which the artist put all his attention into
>furry woman has a non-detailed line for a vagina, that might as well be a coin slot
>go through unsorted folders
>most straight furry art I've downloaded, from threads that were at death's door, consist of this
>realize I'll end up deleting over 80% of a 10/12 gig furry folder
No.506640
>>497752
Taurs are fucking cringe no matter how they're drawn.
No.506655
File: 1457317861520.png (1.21 MB, 879x1080, 293:360, 438edd09b23e229772e7e26453….png)

>>506585
Well, the majority of artists are not used to looking at a vagina. If any of them had even 1/1000 of the interest Eve Ensler has with them, they'd be masters of the craft.
No.506947
>>506585
now I'm curious. got any good furry pics with detailed vaginas to share with us, anon?
No.507147
File: 1457379091021.jpg (31.48 KB, 490x321, 490:321, if you're looking for crop….jpg)

>heterochromia
Can't believe this hasn't been brought up yet.
No.507574
>>507147
Probably because its relatively common in irl huskies. Fucking shit though most of the time. Bright pink and radioactive green eyes!
No.507577
>>507574
Nevermind that, I actually get salty about head fur somehow being a color that DOESN'T match the rest of the pelt. I used to not care about that as much until I realized that furries just don't even bother using the hair dye excuse.
Or worse, when they try to claim that the mismatching hair is a natural color, because that's totally not dumb.
No.507581
>>507577
Like with most internet problems, blame anime. Or the ever-expanding special snowflake race.
It's most terrible with the rainbow hair/eyes/cock don't match anything else about the character and stand out like a sore thumb. It's clear then there isn't any attempt at a coherent colour scheme or theme, it's literally just a 'PAY ATTENTION TO ME' beacon.
No.507588
>>507577
>>507581
I think you guys are taking the furry fandom too seriously. I think people just like being creative and silly with their characters, instead of taking it super duper scientifically seriously.
No.507591
>>507588
Exactly, anthropomorphic means an animal with human traits and emotions, it doesn't say which traits. So some are more human in some parts, like giraffes without the long neck, furs with a different colour hair, or reptiles with breasts. All are equally just as good.
No.507595
>>507591
Well no.
They aren't exactly equal.
I'd say some animals are more equal than others.
Wouldn't you agree?
No.507597
>>507595
Equally as good, not equal.
No.507599
>>507588
a lot of the time they're just being lazy, though.
shortening a giraffe's neck can be a legitimate style choice, but when you've basically just turned it into a dog with a funny pattern you're being more lazy than creative.
(reptiles with breasts or dogs with rainbow hair is closer to the realm of actual stylistic/creative choice, although generic dog characters are still usually lazy.)
No.507601
>>507599
This is a fair point, but the way people are complaining about these things just sound like because they don't do it how they want it, it's shit.
No.507609
>>507599
Thing is, with how internet original characters work, 'trying to be too special in an overly common way' is the new overused normal.
No.507656
>>496909
>>497131
Jesus Christ fucking this times a million.
If "Gibe iet hooge tibtz X–DD" is the only thing you can think of to make something appear female or feminine then you should probably never draw alien species, reptiles, avians, or anything of the sort.
I would rather have no fucking art than scalie art like fuckin first pic.
Second pic is more reasonable when considering the aspirations of hybridizing human x reptile species.
why the fuck does everyone hate small breasts/wide hips combo. I don't fucking get it.
No.507660
>>497365
It's harder to acquire animals other than dogs for sexual reasons. Why do you think horses became so popular?
No.508004
>>507656
I couldn't even tell the 1st pic was a reptile until you pointed it out. Gross.
>>507660
You'd think people would just use Google or something since this is the internet but I guess people are just that lazy.
No.508063
>>507147
Every time I see it I can always hear James McAvoy saying "It's a very groovy mutation."
No.508090
>>507660
This is why I'm a Gryphon type of individual. WINGLESS to at least make it slightly different.
No.508485
>>504138
>>503937
>>503934
>>503926
>>503914
I like to justify some of them as the sharks/scalies wearing a wig, when they literally just have a head of hair and nothing else mammalian about them.
Fivel sometimes draws her gator girl with hair but no tits, in which case it really just must be a wig.
No.508574
>>508485
>Snekgirl gets jelly at other girls with hair
>Snek buys wig; puts it on her head
>"No, wait, this doesn't look quite right"
>Gives wig a haircut
>Becomes a wigdresser after a few more haircuts on different wigs
I would imagine at least a few scalies doing this.
No.508592
>>508004
Or they could just browse /zoo/, they'll learn a lot about anatomy.
No.508653
>Furry porn game
>Only the dog has a correct dick
>Literally everyone else has a human dick
Christ, talk about boring
No.508756
>>497131
>has boobs
>clearly has a mouth incapable of suckling
I like boobs but I can understand this.
No.509554
>Digitigrade legs
>They stand with their legs straight like invisible high-heels
>Digitigrade proportions don't even exist
>It's humanoid leg proportions
u focken wot m8?
No.509628
>>508574
I like this concept
No.509656
>>509628
Right??? Give that idea to a good writer and it'd be relatable as shit, I just know it.
No.509666
>>497555
Even their OCs don't bathe.
No.509711
>>496901
>picture is one dude fucking another dude
>not tagged with any of the normal "gay" tags like male/male, gay, homosexual, or even penis
>post is multiple days old
>picture literally looks like a hydrocephalic with Down's syndrome puked the contents of its feeding tube on a napkin
>only tags are "tagme" and "plz dony delite" (complete with misspelling and l33t spe4k)
>humongous ripped male with dick the size of the Hindenburg
>successfully fucking a female literally 1/4 or less his size
>females taking objects literally larger in diameter than their torso
>ever
>inb4 bag of holding in an otter's ass
>resolution so large it requires multiple commas
>people think this is acceptable
>especially when it's a scaled-up version of a normally-proportioned image complete with artifacts
>comic
>3/4ths of every panel covered in chat bubbles, literally an illustrated War and Peace
>comic sans plus chinglish/slavlish
No.509714
>>496919
>literally any anthro character that isn't a canid
>has a knot
I've seen pics with cat barbs, horse flares, dog knots, and mustelid bulbs all on one dick.
No.509717
>>496961
I am genuinely curious as to how that cameraman didn't get the SHIT bit out of him.
Also that is a very upset chipmunk(?)
No.509721
>>497019
Don't forget that ~every~ chakat is a beyond-MENSA-tier genius at birth (as well as being polyglottal), phases through their dominant sexuality both physically and mentally, can survive hard vacuum for extended periods of time, is completely immune to the effects of prolonged zero-gravity exposure, can self-impregnate with no genetic consequences, and their society as a whole solved all forms of conflict at the genetic level.
As original-author certified canon.
They are literally the Mary Sue of mary sues.
No.509722
>fictional species
>fictional species
>fictional species
No.509732
>>497348
>bovine character
>has a horse penis
Honestly they're pretty similar
>cervine character
>has a horse penis
That's because a 3 foot long needle dick is hilarious, not sexy
No.509745
>>499199
>post complaining about T-shirts and other shirts that very specifically do not open in the front not working with antlers
>b-but shirts that open in the front would work reeeeee1!!!
Seriously
No.509855
>character from a naturally large-bodied species
>hollywood thin
No.509856
No.509862
>>499336
>>499353
>>499399
>>499940
>>503207
>this anally ravaged
>because someone told zoophiles to fuck off and die
top kek
No.509863
>>503138
>this asshurt
>over people responding
>over talking to more than one person per post
Go back to twitter.
>>>/lol/
>>503193
>implying implications
No.509867
>>503138
>I know exactly who you are
>on an anonymous imageboard
>without IDs
>everyone is the same person :^)
No.509868
>>509862
We want him to leave for being a /pol/tard, not an antizoo shitposter, dumbass. try reading sometime.
No.509872
>>509868
>can't handle political views that aren't yours
>implying you aren't anally ravaged because zoofagswere told to die
No.509940
>nigger character
>isn't chimping
No.509962
there's a difference between posting politics where it belongs and being an insufferable shitposter
but I guess you have no self-awareness about that so fuck off either way butthurt fag.
also learn to sage
No.510238
File: 1457885718697.jpg (Spoiler Image, 1.3 MB, 1237x1013, 1237:1013, 1437886162.danzinwolf_1437….jpg)

>>509714
God this shit bothers me. The only non-canid that has a knot are fossa, but even then they have 2 of them and they're barbed.
No.510258
>>509714
>mustelid bulbs
I thought mustelids had a hook. Could you post an example of this?
No.510268
>>510258
No because I fucked that up
>whatever family raccoons fit in
Those have the bulbs
No.510313
>>510268
Raccoons are procyonids, but along with others in the superfamily musteloidea, they basically have spindly curvy dicks. I'm not sure what sort of "bulb" you're talking about.
No.510346
>>510313
well, shit.
Then I have no idea.
There's an animal out there with a bunch of different small bulbs up the length of it.
No.510454
>>509732
>Honestly they're pretty similar
A bull dick looks nothing like a horse dick
>That's because a 3 foot long needle dick is hilarious, not sexy
You people always exaggerate how thin they are when they really not that thin.
No.510476
>>510454
>people always exaggerate how thin they are when they really not that thin
Pic related.
I know they're not *super* thin, but they are really long and are quite thin for their length.
As a comparison to a human dick, they're similar diameter while being about 4x longer. Scale a deer dick down to a nominal 6" average and they'd be the diameter of a Sharpie.
>a bull dick looks nothing like a horse dick
They look exactly the same with the exception of the flare. They even have the medial ring.
No.510627
>>510346
Huh… I'm hardly an expert on animal dicks, but I've seen many of them, and that doesn't ring a bell at all. Sounds interesting, though.
No.510649
>>499083
Whatever the fuck that is it looks amazing… did not realize anthro bats could look this neat
No.511309
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>510238
>>510258
>>510268
>>510313
>>510346
>>510454
>>510476
>All these people that know what a lot of animal wangs look like
No.511457
>>511309
Knowledge is power :^)
No.511464
>>511457
A good number of those penises are inaccurate you know.
No.511471
>>507588
>>507601
Dumb nigger, it's not about being a smartass, it's about oversaturated colors and horrible color schemes which make your character objectively shit. There are rules to follow for effectively combining colors so your picture isn't physically painful to look at.
>muh creativity
pathetic excuse to say the least.
No.511475
No.511476
>>511471
Shit like sparklewolves always makes me question color theory.
If the idea is that certain colors naturally "fit" better alongside other colors, why do we get people that can call the average paint store incident good looking?
Generally I just write off those people as being some form of "visually tone deaf".
No.511482
>>511475
well the rodent penis is just wrong, they tend to be much shorter. The avian penises don't look like they belong to any of the few birds that do have penises. the feline penis is misshapen and ditto for the pig penis. Considering this however, it is still the most accurate compilation of animal penises by a single artist I have ever seen.
No.511483
>>511476
Either the vast majority of this fandom has shit taste or they're coloblind.
I think the answer is obvious…
No.511485
>>511480
It has less to do with not having complimentary colors as having the colors be completely fucking saturated and also not belonging on any animal that isn't a tropical bird.
You say that red-orange and lime-green are complimentary? Well, now you're going to get someone making an orange-and-green wolf and saying "I used color theory so it's okay!!"
No.511489
>>511485
actually, it's both.
No.511493
>>511480
counterpoint: adhering 100% to the "rules" of color theory can make your shit bland
it's what causes the tumblr "look", where everything's all soft and desaturated so it looks like a tampon commercial
neon has a place, is what i'm trying to say
when you treat stylistic choices as pass-fail engineering problems, your range of acceptable design decisions shrinks and begins to resemble the "content" of everyone else who's read the same books
>but this generates ideal dopamine output curves according to Dongshifter et al.
so does heroin
No.511520
>>511483
Im supposed to be colorblind but I can tell all those color bars apart??
Fuck if I know