YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
No.510439
Now that Zootopia made the furry fandom more mainstream. How soon until we see all those articles by Feminists journalists attacking the furry fandom for not being sexists like what happening with Bronies & gamers. I give it until Zootopia 2 until we see you don't need furries to be your core audience articles.
No.510442
>>510439
such femdom
much amaze
wow
No.510449
What a whiny little bitch you turned out to be. Don't you have other problems to complain about? Like finding a job for your broke-still-lives-at-home-cant-get-laid-at-19 ass?
No.510451
>>510449
>19
you are being generous here
No.510455
>>510439
oh fuck off
the fandom has been full of normalfags for years already. feminists wouldn't be 'normalfags ruining the fandom' because that's already been done (well, normalfags coming in - there isn't really a stage you can definitively say 'this is ruined' because it's always been shit.)
that you think 'feminists are coming!' hits me as a pretty solid indicator that you're amusingly unaware of your own normalfaggotry.
if furry was videogames, you'd be the consumer-demographic that drove companies to kill innovation in favour of brown and bloom FPS games, ruining it for those who came before you, then crying when you thought SJWs were coming to do unto you what you did onto me.
No.510456
>>510449
>Can't laid at 19
I'm almost 29. Also I'm just a virgin because I choose to be one cause I am a asexual.
No.510457
I understand your concerns but Zootopia is harmless enough as a movie. If the articles about furries getting gassed didn't bring attention to the fandom then the articles of furries going to see the movie wont.
Though that refugee article…THAT might attract some views.
No.510460
>>510456
>I choose to be one cause I am a asexual.
then your opinion doesent matter, since your genes are doomed, therefore will have no further impact on the world
No.510462
>oh no! feminists will attack our fandom now!
>now
its like you dont even know who PK is
No.510465
>>510460
I have nerve damage from being hit by a drunk driver. You honestly think i should be breeding? I probably can't have sex to begin with anyways.
No.510467
>>510465
>nerve damage changes your genes
kek, thats no fucking excuse
No.510469
>>510442
Doge is retarded, fuck off
>>510439
>Normies ruining the Furry fandom
What, all the scat porn, scam artists, autistic fetishists fucking in public and wearing diapers in conventions didn't do it for ya? NOW it's being ruined? Please.
>>510460
>What is artificial insemination
Asexuals can still get boners and cum; but aside from that saying peoples' opinions don't matter because they're asexual is stupid and illogical.
For sage
No.510470
>>510469
>multiple replies in one post
feeling entitled, aren't we?~
No.510474
>>510473
awwww, and you still care enough to reply! :3c
No.510475
>>510449
>>510451
>>510455
>i'm not a feminist entryist, i'm just anti-anti-feminist ;^)
found the carriers ,':^J
No.510485
>>510483
n-no bully a-anon >//////<
No.510486
>>510467
>>510467
>kek, thats no fucking excuse
How so? I can't even drink icy cold drinks without suffering from horrible back pain from my nerve damage.
No.510487
>>510485
I'm going to post this everyday until you're straight
No.510488
>>510449
seriously how bad at guerilla warfare do you have to be to hear someone worrying about infiltration and have your natural conclusion be to shout from under a foot of brush, "NO COMMIES HERE NOSSIR I BET WHOEVER SAID THAT HAS BRAIN PROBLEMS AND BAD BREATH"
you have no chill
No.510489
>>510456
>asexual
>virgin by "choice"
>back 2 >>>/tumblr/
No.510491
>>510489
everyone should lose their virginity at 14
No.510494
>>510491
>14
They're too old by that point, anon
No.510495
File: 1457913578065.png (1.52 MB, 2233x1375, 203:125, 1d05db83e69303a0705037fb45….png)

>>510487
>gays not welcome
prove it
No.510496
>>510494
exactly. it's young without being pedo
No.510497
>>510495
>knots are cinnamon buns
wat
No.510499
>>510475
i'm not anti-anti-feminist or anti-feminist, i'm anti normalfag.
No.510500
is /furry/ the easiest board to shitpost at?
No.510502
>>510495
Noone likes gays. They're gay. Even other gays hate gays. being gay in 2016 is gay.
You homo.
Gays pls go.
No.510503
File: 1457914169690.jpg (548.14 KB, 1280x711, 1280:711, 3ffb0c24f941964f5d012ab8b9….jpg)

No.510504
File: 1457914215635.jpg (560.1 KB, 1251x742, 1251:742, 2d97dc3c5ff95e4f3b14668818….jpg)

>>510502
So is biscum alright?
No.510505
>>510500
Nah that'd be /n/, there's no moderation and they have literally have DESIGNATED SHITTING STREETS i/n/dian threads.
No.510506
>>510504
Bi is master race
excellent taste in sexuality anon
No.510509
File: 1457914628909.png (694.73 KB, 2100x995, 420:199, 7c7a5622e2dbf85e9ae4cf290a….png)

No.510513
>>510504
As long as you don't act like a girl in wider society And save it for being topped in a maid costume biscum is alright.
No.510514
>>510505
>Someone made /n/ to get back at /pol/
>/n/ becomes a bigger shitposting board than /sp/
At least /n/ not /leftypol/
No.510517
No.510518
>>510517
why not both? a fursuit with a maid outfit over it
No.510520
No.510596
No.510599
No.510605
No.510609
>>510596
>intersectionalism
No.510611
Given what the "furry "fandom"" consists of, I think this can only end in improvements.
No.510612
>>510611
go back to SRS, nerd
No.510747
>>510665
>Zootopia offers a lesson about authority
>are police and local government bad or good?
>Zootopia weighs in and says "well, kind of both"
>some authorities are good, and some are bad
>but the bad eggs are a big problem because of the power they hold
>they're protected by the system
…Can someone explain to me what the hell this person is going on about, because none of that was in the movie I saw??? Like not even remotely.
The villain of the movie wasn't in a position of real power, nor is she even really an authority, her boss was, and the system didn't protect or condone her at all. Also, did this person really just compare black people to lions!?
If anything, this movie was the most anti-feminist movie I've ever seen.
A crazed cunt sees a group of people as "savage" and "untrustworthy" so manufactures a fake controversy and media frenzy to try and get the public against them. The bitch even had the glasses; she was just missing the hoop earrings.
No.510748
>>510747
>The villain of the movie wasn't in a position of real power
Gonna disagree with you there, secretaries/assistants/etc in her position can wield great power (they control access to the person who nominally has power, plus you see the amount of things the mayor leaves to her to do while he plays politics - she has influence over the implementation of policy, even if nominally the mayor is the one to dictate it.)
They're not recognized as such by society, though. (Which is part of WHY they can be so powerful in the first place.)
No.510754
>>510748
>Gonna disagree with you there, secretaries/assistants/etc in her position can wield great power (they control access to the person who nominally has power, plus you see the amount of things the mayor leaves to her to do while he plays politics - she has influence over the implementation of policy, even if nominally the mayor is the one to dictate it.)
Her position had little to do with what she did though? She could have been a chimney sweeper and still pulled this off. She hired some goons to drug random predators, and you don't need political power to assault and drug random citizens; you just do it. What happened after would have likely still happened just to keep society calm, since most of it is hysterical herbivores. She didn't need to be a politician or control anything, that was just a bonus to make sure things go smoothly.
No.510758
>>510449
>still-lives-at-home
As opposed to what? Homeless? In prison? On a boat?
Wherever you live is your home.
No.510800
>>510439
There's actually an "abrasive feminist" clique in the fandom, it's just that they aren't influential because they whine and block people on twitter more than doing good art.
No.510803
>>510439
>implying this board isn't filled with normalfags already
No.510944
can i have a torrent to download zootopia movie?
No.510971
furry is not a hijackable fandom like how other fandoms are
if SJW and feminist try to subvert it, they will end up being the ones who get subverted
we already have all of their gender ridiculousness and people who are crazier than they will ever be, this is like walking into a minefield of fetishes for them
No.510973
>>510502
>"Just act less gay"
They're still encouraging faggotry
No.511204
>>510465
Shit anon, I'm sorry. Drunk drivers are the scum of the Earth, and they should be trialled on attempted murder.
No.511220
>>510971
>lol im immune to HIV watch me gangbang a bunch of dudes
they're gonna start substituting piggy, dumpy furpeople for your idealized animal persons because it's less problematic
No.511263
>>510439
>feminists
I can totally imagine some sort of #furrygate emerging, but it's not like anybody would care about what feminazis say about us. Artists won't start catering to the whims of crazy ever-PMS "wommyns" just because there's a few articles on tumblr or buzzfeed or wherever.
>>510455
>reeee normies
I'd rather hang out with normalfags than with 40 year old macrodiapervore fetishists who are gonna drug you and dismember you in their dungeon at first opportunity.
No.511351
>>510460
>I choose to be one cause I am a asexual.
>sexuality
>chose
No.511352
>>511263
but that's kinda hot
No.511367
>>511263
>fetishists who are gonna drug you and dismember you in their dungeon at first opportunity.
this really misses how harmless most fetish-autists in the fandom are.
the ones most likely to do anything dodgy aren't the scat inflation diaper cock vore fetishists, it's the ones with pretty normal sexualities (except that they'd rape you given the chance, even if they don't fetishise rape) and the pedophiles (which obviously have some crossover with cubfags, but most cubfags are similarly harmless autists who would get their ass kicked if they tried to sexually assault a child.)
basically less chis-chan and more creepy old man.
No.511406
>>511367
Whatever their exact fetishes are, most non-normie furs are sick as fuck and I don't want to be associated with them.
So infusion of casuals is a good thing, both for the quality of experience with the fandom and our public image (I don't want to be considered pedo or scatfag because I like drawn animals).
No.511460
>>511406
>public image
>caring about what normalfags think
>implying your image needs to be protected
>when all you really need to do is hide your powerlevel so they don't find out in the first place
No.511472
>>510455
shitty pixel-art games about having your first lesbian period are not "innovation"
>>511263
>I'd rather eat shit than drink piss
>>511352
barafriend please, you are going to get AIDS at this rate
No.511481
>>511472
>>511472
>shitty pixel-art games about having your first lesbian period are not "innovation"
those came AFTER brown-and-bloom killed innovation, so i don't see how that's relevant.
No.511494
>>510758
With your parents you dense motherfucker.
This entire thread is a fine example of how insecure and ravenously bitchy you all are. If non furs watching this movie and discovering the fandom is your biggest problem, you have MUCH bigger problems.
Disgraceful that of the few furry boards left, 8chans furry is packed full of new age whiners and sensitive post 1990 babies. When 8chan dies, where will you go. You have no where else to turn.
No.511502
>>511460
I want furry subculture as a whole to be treated as something normal (well, quirky, but not any more weird than, say, sci-fi fans or comics conventions).
The situation is the same as with gays, who could have probably stayed in the closet forever, concealing their "power levels", but instead they chose to fight for recognition and tolerance. Albeit many people still think of them as bdsm leather freaks or crossdressing sissies, the stereotypes slowly die out, allowing them to integrate into the general "normie" society without the need to deny and hide a part of who they are.
>>511494
I dunno, I've only recently discovered it. I'm actually not aware of any other English-speaking furry boards besides this and lulz.net (and that place is simply awful).
No.511507
>>511502
>I want furry subculture as a whole to be treated as something normal
>The situation is the same as with gays, who could have probably stayed in the closet forever
Sometimes it's better to stay in the closet, friendo.
No.511554
>>511502
>fight for recognition and tolerance
Recognition and tolerance is earned, it is not a right and you cannot just demand them from anybody.
And screaming at people on the internet and organizing parades most people find wierd is an odd way to fight, unless your goal was to alienate normalfags.
You really want this shit to become like that?
No.511558
No.511592
>this thread goes to shit-throwing "muh SJW society morals" in just 2 replies
No wonder /furbox/ isn't more popular. There are VERY FEW furries that aren't major edgelords. The furry fandom is full of fucking drama. You guys are equally as bad as the Reddit fags.
No.511593
>>510469
damn that's EDGY as fuck
go back to /b/ edgy fag
No.511595
>>510487
>old guy meme
>animal abuse
MODS MODS MODS
he shouldn't be on this board
if anybody else besides him/his "friends" tells me that I'm a SJW/idiot I'll believe it
No.511650
>>511502
>without the need to deny and hide a part of who they are.
you don't "need" to hide being a furfag, there's just no reason to reveal your power level constantly.
someone constantly wearing vulcan ears is just as stupid as someone wearing a tail, if you're doing it in a contextually appropriate way (fan meetup, convention, etc.) it's completely reasonable but don't expect anyone to take you serious if you show up to work like that.
most anti-furry shit is just lazy /b/tards, SA users, and idiots like GameFAQs who were influenced by them. normies don't actually fucking care (except the occasional tumblr post which is something like "furry convention gassed!" anyway and the worst thing you'll get in any sort of earnestness is "hahaha those are funny looking people", not "FURRIES DESERVE TO BE HOLOCAUSTED")
But then I'm of the few that the 'furry' name is too tainted by idiocy to identify with anyway, recognizing some crossover in interests but rejecting anything to do with the community and (in public) the pornography (no, it IS completely reasonable people laugh at your cartoon porn, your porn habits aren't something you should be discussing anyway, it's not "hiding" something when there's no reason to bring it up), so what do I know.
No.511714
>>511592
pic
>>511593
>not knowing /b/ was the birthplace of furfaggotry
>being this much of a newfag
>>511595
>being this much of a beta pussy faggot
there's nothing in /furry/'s rules against posting animal abuse so fuck you and fuck the hotpockets
go back to >>>/tumblr/ and stay there until you grow some balls and stop getting mad at the internet
I'm pretty sure it's just the furbox fag samefagging
No.511731
>>511714
> /b/ was the birthplace of furfaggotry
you are the dumbest nigger to ever chuck a spear and i feel dumber for having watched you do it.
No.511732
>>511650
it's funny how many people take anti-fur shit seriously when it's basically a SA meme
fun fact: the guy who wrote some of the main anti-furry copypastas now writes books about Japanese Jesus UFOs
No.511738
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
映画『ズートピア』 Dream Amiが歌う日本語版主題歌「トライ・エヴリシング」
No.511739
>>511732
Assuming you mean who I think you do, She (geddit?!?) also had a furry account and logs of him in #SAFurs on that account exist.
No.511743
>>511739
hahaha holy shit no way, you actually know who I'm talking about
also, "her" whole anti-loli thing and then getting excommunicated from SA over an MSPaint picture anyway. hilarious.
goddamn it HW fix your fucking site
No.511766
>>511494
>With your parents you dense motherfucker.
Then you should've said that. Why don't people say what they mean?
You're the one equating home with parents here, which makes me suspect you're projecting. Oh, you may not literally live with your parents, but perhaps you rely on them in some ways you're not proud of.
No.511797
>>511554
I actually meant representation in media and public figures coming out. The degeneracy parades are even worse than furcon attendees going on the streets and radiating autism. Homos got more or less accepted in the west thanks to people who showed the world that they are no different from normies in most regards.
>>511650
I'm not saying that attentionwhoring IRL shouldn't be viewed as inappropriate outside of meetups.
It's just if you tell people you're a furfag or if you somehow show that you are one on the net (have something like a cartoon animal avatar on steam or an animal profile name on a forum), the people who know about furries are gonna assume that you're a sex crazed freak.
The meme you talk about has gotten out of control, it's not just halfchan that hates us. I mean, if we have random people poisoning us at conventions, that's some serious hatred.
Also, furries is not just porn habbits, same as being gay is not just bum drilling.
No.511808
>>510439
Dont worry, I'm sure the pozzed up furries will give them the gift :^)
No.511819
>>511592
Nobody cares about your board. Actually, no, I'm being unfair, around 11% of /furry/'s userbase originally cared, and that has now decreased to 3%. If you want people to watch what they say because they fear repercussions, there are plenty of furry sites that already fill that role. Please stop thinking you're so superior to everyone.
>>511797
I'm not the guy you're responding to, but I have enough self-awareness to say that yes, I am a sex-crazed freak. Even without telling anyone about my furshit, I was always more comfortable with and curious about sex than all of my normie friends. Sometimes I'd forget things like warning them that there's brief nudity in the movie I recommended to them, and they'd be shocked and leave the room when it happened. At 20 years old.
For furry to be accepted as mainstream, there has to be a larger percentage of clean work, and most furry content creators have no imagination outside of pornography. You can make SFW with furry characters, but then is there something interesting to this character besides the fact that he's a dog? The reason why Endtown, Lackadaisy Cats, and Dreamkeepers always get recommended for good furry media is the fact that the authors didn't set out to make a furry comic, they set out to make a good comic that happened to contain furry characters. Even Poppy O'Possum showed promise originally. But when Onta tried to make a clean comic, it demonstrated just how boring most of his characters are outside the bedroom. This is a widespread feature of the fandom; when the average furry makes a new character, they focus on physical attributes because sex is the character's primary purpose. Sea Salt is the perfect example. How would Sea Salt react if his father passed away? Judging by his past actions, he would have sex with his corpse.
So no, furry doesn't have to be all about the porn, but the people who produce and consume furry media mostly want porn, and the clean stuff is there as a kinda-boring sideshow. This is again apparent in how clean art has to be of exceptional quality to attract any attention, because with no dicks out, most people don't see any purpose in it.
No.511851
>>511204
>Shit anon, I'm sorry. Drunk drivers are the scum of the Earth, and they should be trialled on attempted murder.
Thank you…
No.511855
>>511797
>>511797
>the people who know about furries are gonna assume that you're a sex crazed freak.
at this stage i would rather sfw anthro fandom be totally disassociated with furries, rather than trying to redeem the identity of 'furry'
have 'furry' be everything sexual and nsfw and make up a new identity for non-furry anthro fans. sure, 90% of the latter would still jack it to furry porn, but if they're not complete idiots they can use different names and maintain plausible deniability.
No.511857
>>511855
Why have separate fandoms? Because you're insecure about what people think about you if you browse a SFW section in a mixed SFW-NSFW site? That's a problem with you being a pussy.
No.511860
>>511819
But, continuing my previous analogy, somehow there's plenty of gay characters in various media that aren't just buttfucking, but doing more or less normal things that all humans do. Sure, we'll probably see them in a romantic relationship with someone of the same sex, and maybe we even see some homoerotic scenes, that's what sets them apart after all. And when you meet gay people, you might know about their relationship status, without getting any details of their bedroom activities.
And the furry fandom itself is based around the general idea of anthro animals and around cartoons/comics/vydia that features them, not around porn of them. There's rule 34 in pretty much every fandom, but that's not what defines it, fans usually just like some fictional universe or a general concept.
>>511857
NSFW itself is not that much of a problem.
It's the fetish stuff that is. You won't see as many perverts of all kinds (especially the more disturbing ones) anywhere else as in furry fandom. With the possible exception of anime fandom.
No.511867
>>511857
>Because you're insecure about what people think about you if you browse a SFW section in a mixed SFW-NSFW site?
Because it helps nobody to mix the two:
NSFW users have to tolerate finding SFW images in their porn searches, especially ones with fetishes like crossdressing which can technically be "sfw"
SFW users are constantly accused about discussing their NSFW hobby where it isn't appropriate.
>>511860
furry is not a sexuality, it's much closer to a fetish (which pretends to be a fandom.)
>There's rule 34 in pretty much every fandom, but that's not what defines it, fans usually just like some fictional universe or a general concept.
except that in furry, the majority of content (if not in absolute terms, then in some way that quantifies popularity alongside raw image numbers) is rule 34, which is what makes it distinct from say - star trek fans, and is the reason people don't get seriously accused of wanting to fuck Klingons just because their avatar is spock.
which is why i would rather see 'furry' considered a distinct thing. sometimes you can't restore something's reputation, especially when half the things they say about it are true.
>NSFW itself is not that much of a problem.
>It's the fetish stuff that is
Protip: to any normal person, all NSFW furry artwork is 'fetish stuff', the best you can hope for is that they recognize it's a distinct fetish from bestiality.
No.511872
>>511867
>porn searches
Galleries like e621 typically have multiple search criteria, so you can do a query like "zootopia rating:safe -crossdressing".
>people don't get seriously accused of wanting to fuck Klingons just because their avatar is spock
This made me laugh.
But I want to get the same treatment, just because I have Nick on my avatar doesn't mean I want to fuck him or whatever.
There's like TONS of slash fiction in some fandoms (Harry Potter, for instance) where literally everyone had read one at some point, and yet people don't think them sick.
>fetish (which pretends to be a fandom.)
But you can like things without being sexually attracted to them, just for the aesthetics of it. And that probably gives rise to fetish, not vice versa.
>all NSFW furry artwork is 'fetish stuff'
Uh, might be, but many "normies" admitted to wanting to fuck Judy after seeing the movie.
No.511873
>>511731
fuck off and lurk moar
>>>/newfag/
No.511875
>>511872
>There's like TONS of slash fiction in some fandoms (Harry Potter, for instance) where literally everyone had read one at some point, and yet people don't think them sick.
because they don't make up the majority of the Harry Potter fandom. (at least partly because Harry Potter is a singular series people can coherently coalesce around , while 'furry' is a vague aesthetic preference.) while they do make up the majority of self-identified furries.
which is why i favour having two different 'fandoms', because you'll never push furry in such a way that pornography isn't the most popular thing amongst those who identify with it. (and many people would, often quite justifiably, resent you trying to do so.)
>Uh, might be, but many "normies" admitted to wanting to fuck Judy after seeing the movie.
normies can have fetishes too, anon.
No.511876
>>511867
>SFW users are constantly accused about discussing their NSFW hobby where it isn't appropriate.
And? As I said, the only reason to care about that is insecurity.
No.511882
>>511876
>the only reason to care about that is insecurity.
false.
if people think that you're talking about your NSFW hobby in an inappropriate place, they're less likely to take you seriously. now on the one hand, i'm secure enough to not care about that, they can think whatever they want about me and it won't hurt my feelings - but on the other hand, there are very real pragmatic disadvantages to having others refuse to take you seriously. your other (unrelated) suggestions for improvement to a site, for example, may be taken less seriously because of the (irrelevant, but still considered) reputation you've got.
i don't care about what you think about me because of my feelings, i care what you think about me because it dictates how likely you are to do what i want (or at least support doing what i want.)
No.511891
>>511592
>furfags having casual banter
>"Y-Y-You guys are e-edgelords!I can't take someone being onlu slight negative!
Go back to FA. Part of me wants to call you Klace or Jasonafex, but at least they were entertaining to make fun of.
No.511943
>>511873
The birthplace of furfaggotry was fantasy and sci-fi, and happened in smaller quantities before the internet. As evidence, I present this pic, done in June of 1982.
Are you really that ignorant of the history of your own hobby?
No.511946
>>511943
I meant on the imageboards you jackass, /b/ was where the original furfags congregated.
>The birthplace of furfaggotry was fantasy and sci-fi
A genre does not qualify as a place, that's like saying the birthplace of guns is physics
No.511953
>>511946
>I meant on the imageboards you jackass
and how the fuck is that relevant to anything? if you're going to pull that shit, the "birthplace" of literally anything except anime that existed before 2004 was probably /b/
No.511969
>>511953
One of the oldest, perhaps the first furry image board, is fchan.
No.512051
>>511953
>The birthplace of furfaggotry is /b/
>Furry is older than /b/, retard. Here's an old-as-fuck picture
>I-I meant imageboards!
I wish there were smug kemono lolis
No.512135
>>512051
>I'm going to pretend I misunderstood him
>That'll show em!
You know you have to be 18 to post here, right?
No.512158
No.512228
>>512051
>smug kemono lolis
No.512321
>>512135
Then why are you posting?
No.512322
>>512135
My misunderstanding was completely genuine. And even though I can't prove it, more than one person misunderstood. I am >>511943, but not >>511731.
Try to imagine yourself as an unbiased 3rd party. Someone posts animal abuse, another person tells him to go back to /b/, the 1st person responds with "/b/ was the birthplace of furfaggotry", and that's it. Wouldn't you assume they meant "/b/ was the first time animal people were sexualized" and not "/b/ was the first imageboard where furfags congregated"? Expressing yourself clearly in writing is an important skill, and reviewing what you've just written and thinking "Would a random person read this and understand what I meant?" is a good strategy to hone that skill.
A genre is a category of art, literature or music. To put it another way, it's category of books, paintings/sculptures, and music sheets, which exist in the real world. Furry was born on the pages of science fiction and fantasy books, where people wrote about animal people. These animal people were then drooled over by sci-fi and fantasy fans, creating modern furfaggotry.
No.512327
>>511406
Can we get an updated version of this image with red lines all the way to Bui? :^)
No.512328
>>512321
You're about 10 years late for that type of reply, friendo
>>512322
If you wanna go THAT way then you could say ancient religions with animal people was the OG furfaggotry
No.512330
>>512328
>reply
It's an actual question. Don't you have homework to be doing?
No.512334
File: 1458183246014.png (1.83 MB, 1362x1350, 227:225, I seriously hope you guys ….png)

>>512330
>Homework
I'm an adult, I'm in college
…and it's spring break
No.512355
>>511808
goodness knows they can't earn it :^) :^)
No.512366
>>512322
what about the letters pages in comic books? like usagi yojimbo?
No.512368
>>512328
>If you wanna go THAT way then
>you could say ancient religions
>with animal people was the OG
>furfaggotry
some people basically say this, and perfectly in earnest
No.512369
>>512366
Sure, that definitely counts.
No.512453
>>510747
Laci Green is a retarded youtube whore.
No.512462
>>511969
Wow, it's still alive. For some reason I thought it was down.
No.512705
>>511714
I am the furbox moderator but I finally grew up and learned that my SJW ways were shit and the world is too stupid to treat other people nice in.
No.512720
>>512705
That's what fascism is for.
We can treat people nicely, but let's just make sure they conform to our worldview first.
People who disagree with us should be driven away, excluded or shot.
No.512724
No.512731
>>512724
Do you know what a fasces is?
It is an old fashioned axe, fashioned from many smaller pieces of wood. Not always an axe, but certainly a bundle of wood. You could also call it a "faggot".
"Faggotism" is an alternative name for "fascism" which means the same thing.
Because there are so many small pieces, the bundle is strong.
Fascism is nothing more than "As groups, we are stronger than isolated individuals."
The existence of different boards even on 8chan is fascism.
We've got /v/ for video game aligned people, /furry/ for furries, /a/ for anime people, and so on.
The only people who oppose fascism are SJWs, because they want to treat everyone the same, no matter if they're the same or different.
Most common people are fascists, just not on the scale of Hitler or Mussolini or those other fucks who went too far.
True fascism shouldn't feel any different than a world where you feel connected to your community, your friends understand you and your enemies respect your boundaries and you respect theirs.
That's all. Please don't be confused as to what fascism is just based on what enemies of fascism have told you. That would be called "being brainwashed" quite literally.
No.512748
>>512731
>fascism iz gud u guiz
>if u dun agree ur a a big meenie SJW!
>/v/ for video game aligned people, /furry/ for furries, /a/ for anime people
Right, and >>>/pol/ for the retarded
Kindly go back
Again fascism is still shit.
No.512754
>>512731
Fascism is a word that has lost all meaning.
It's almost never used to refer to a coherent political ideology, it's just used 75% of the time by idiots as a pejorative, and 25% of the time by idiots who see the other idiots using it as a pejorative and go "They're wrong… FASCISM IS GOOD!" without knowing what fascism is.
To be fair, it didn't help that actual fascists tended to be vague as fuck about what they wanted (as all politicians do) then splinter into a billion groups when their ideology was discredited (for a similar situation see communists, but communism still has some vague defining principles people can agree on while anything from state-communism to libertarianism to the current economic system can be attacked as "fascist".)
No.512756
>>512720
>I got b& for my furbox post
They're just mad that my board turned edgy and are punishing me for changing it.
(USER WAS FOR BANNED FOR THIS POST)
No.512762
>>512731
Oh please, /pol/, nazis, and fascists are just the SJWs of the right
No.512763
>>512756
you spelt "mod privileges" wrong by the way
No.512768
>>512756
>I GOT BANNED FOR THIS POST U GUIZ
Doesn't show up on the log…is this a joke?
https://8ch.net/log.php?page=1&board=furry
No.512790
>>512762
I'm not from /pol/ though.
I've got nothing against jews, gay people, transgender people, or people of other races, or anyone really.
I think beauty can be found in all people, no matter what, and that all lives matter.
With that in place, why is fascism so bad?
I'm not a nazi, just a person who thinks that uniting as people under one banner is beneficial to those who align themselves with that group.
It makes us stronger when we see each other as friends, rather than enemies or whatever the fuck that weird image is supposed to mean.
If all people agree with fascism, then even if we are all a bunch of separated faggots, we've still got our communities and friends to support us.
And as humanity becomes more and more global, for that is the nature of the internet and exploration, we will further unite, until hopefully all of humanity is one, and there is peace and unity.
No need for violence or hate. Only love.
Fascism is love.
No.512795
>>512790
In that case fascism is obsolete because we already have a system of ensuring freedoms, just needs some fixes. Anything contrary to that is an infringement on those freedoms, which is undesirable.
Other than that getting everyone to hold hands and sing kumbaya is a fever dream, all we can do is hope to give people the means of freedom and leave it to do what they want.
Also learn to fucking sage
No.512800
>>512795
Yes, that system is fascism.
Not the most extreme form, but I don't think sane people want an extreme form of nazism or fascism.
Anyways, I would like to hold hands and sing kumbaya. If people actually did this, the world would be a better place. Singing a song together and making everyone part of a community is a powerful, non-violent move that can unite people.
That is the power of fascism. Unity, liberty and justice.
No.512804
>>512790
If you claimed to be a "nationalist" or something instead of a fascist people might take you more seriously.
Fascism (actual fascism) is militaristic and conservative as well as economically controlling, it's not about sitting around and holding hands, the concept of unity is generally embraced only insofar as it empowers the state.
Nationalism, on the other hand, is compatible with a huge number of different ideologies - like Fascism, it's partly been painted with the "all nationalists = nazi" brush, but unlike fascism there are credible examples that this isn't the case (see Scottish and Catalan nationalism, which are generally "You can be from anywhere in the world, if you want to take yourself into our national identity [and implicitly at present, support our independence] then you're welcome to be here"
Nationalism can be used to push for nationality as a unifying identity between peoples without falling into the authoritarian/militaristic parts of fascism, and if you're generally after "mild fascism, without the bad parts" it's about as close as you're going to get.
Though with
>And as humanity becomes more and more global, for that is the nature of the internet and exploration, we will further unite, until hopefully all of humanity is one, and there is peace and unity.
you seem more like an internationalist than a nationalist (although again the two aren't incompatible, you can believe certain peoples are a distinct nation while still believing in cordial relationships with others, and the ability to take on a new nationality)
No.512816
File: 1458260247247.png (1.79 MB, 1280x886, 640:443, a48cac551ff2453ec877d97c48….png)

No.512818
>>512804
I'm happy you mentioned that last point.
I'm not a nationalist, because I view humans and human ideals as transient. Soon humans will be gone, our ideals, laws and nations will be dust, and a new species will live in our place.
Not furries, but likely robots or machine people.
I mean, if moore's law or evolution continues forever, that will be the result.
Plus we've all seen that "Pale Blue Dot" photo. Earth is small and humans are weak.
I say join together under one banner, and let's make the most of our life.
The idea that fascism or nationalism or whatever has to be pro-military is only because humans used to require the military to get things. We had to rob other "tribes" in order to be sure we have enough for ourselves.
But with the advent of advanced technology, farming and construction abilities, we don't need military anymore.
Erm, when I say "anymore", I mean, we should plan for a future without military, even if at this moment, the world is still embroiled in chaos and violence.
Post-scarcity is coming, and I want everyone to enjoy the benefits of it. Not just some people in some countries.
No.512870
>>512818
With oil, coal and gas running out scarcity is far from over. When delivery trucks stop rolling around town that pipe dream will explode all in your face. That period of plenty was because of the oil era allowing for massive automation and replacement of human labor, and that era is ending.
No.512905
>>512731
>"Faggotism" is an alternative name for "fascism" which means the same thing.
/pol/niggers admitting they're all a bunch of faggots lol
No.512907
>>512870
It will end for a moment, but if we can get LFTRs running along with more efficient solar power, and find other alternative sources of materials and energy, such as asteroid mining or other currently "sci-fi" methods of production, we should be fine.
Of course, it looks like we're not on that path currently, rather, we're trying to become more socialist when we should become more libertarian.
Socialism is only good during a time of plenty, when we have enough to share with everyone.
When times get rough, we need libertarian policies, so people are free to innovate, and don't feel like they're being stolen from when times are already tough.
>>512905
I'm not from /pol/. I despise that place, and I won't waste my breath talking about it.
Anyways, there is nothing wrong with being united, even if it uses a word like faggot.
I have nothing against LGBT people and never will, so such a word means nothing if used on me. I would rather a person think I'm black or gay or a jew or a woman than have someone think I'm a liar or a bad person.
No.512909
Isn't the fandom already jammed full of feminists and SJWs that are really ineffectual because the whole economy of the fandom both financially and in terms of attention is mostly just From horny people To individuals drawing pictures of big titty foxes in their bedrooms so there's no real business entities with PR departments to get worried?
No.512910
>>512909
Probably.
Furry is for everyone, and anyone can use furry however they like.
People who try to shackle others and limit their creative expression are oppressive people, and should be shunned without mercy.
No.513001
>>512909
>>512910
But I don't see a lot of feminist furry art on tumblr yet..
No.513055
>>512800
>Yes, that system is fascism.
Uh no, it's democracy.
No.513059
>>512754
>To be fair, it didn't help that actual fascists tended to be vague as fuck about what they wanted
The only official definition of fascism comes from Benito Mussolini, the founder of fascism, in which he outlines three principles of a fascist philosophy.
1."Everything in the state". The Government is supreme and the country is all-encompasing, and all within it must conform to the ruling body, often a dictator.
2."Nothing outside the state". The country must grow and the implied goal of any fascist nation is to rule the world, and have every human submit to the government.
3."Nothing against the state". Any type of questioning the government is not to be tolerated. If you do not see things our way, you are wrong. If you do not agree with the government, you cannot be allowed to live and taint the minds of the rest of the citizens.
>>512790
>>512800
>>512804
>>512818
>>512907
I'm not buying it. Fascism and nationalism are both equally shit.
>>>/pol/
No.513068
>>513059
>Fascism and nationalism are both equally shit
Possibly the dumbest statement I've ever heard.
There's such a thing as 'civic nationalism' which is generally beneficial, there's no such thing as 'civic fascism'
you don't have to be a flag-waving foreigner hating "patriot" to be a nationalist.
No.513288
>>513068
Fuck off. Nationalism can die in a fire.
No.513300
>>513288
You can consider nationalism shit all you like, but to equate it with fascism is idiocy.