/gamergatehq/ - #GamerGate Headquarters

We going to get minutes from the staff roundtable? Is everything sorted out now with that?

>>179666

Minutes will be released to the board, but later on. As far as what we've sorted out?

Oh, yes. The times are a changin;. :3

>>179701

Is there any chance that the full logs from the roundtable will be released? Such a gesture of transparency would do a lot to hinder future division shilling.

>>179762

lol, Never going to happen.

>>179799

You wouldn't have any guarantees that they aren't doctored though, so what's even the point.

If you want transparency make the meeting on a public IRC chatroom and only voice other mods. This way anyone interested can watch the meeting.

But that's never going to happen either.

>>179806

Even so, it would be good to pour over the logs to get a better understanding of their outlooks on the board and moderation. Yes, there is always the possibility that they may be doctored, but unless they decide to fabricate the majority of the conversation and are able to do so convincingly, it should still serve as an insight as to what their perspectives are.

Acid Man already mentioned he would release the logs, calm down

>>179819

Ah, that's good. Do you happen to have a link to where he said that?

>>179826

It's right in this thread: >>179701

Minutes basically means a log of what was proposed, discussed, and decided on during a meeting. Doesn't necessarily mean full IRC logs, though

I'm assuming Acid knew what I meant when I asked.

>>179819

>Acid Man already mentioned he would release the logs

>>179901

>Doesn't necessarily mean full IRC logs

Exactly, which is why anon asked for the full logs instead, which acid at no point agreed to release.

Your previous statement is either retarded or intentionally missleading.

>>179917

Wasn't my previous statement. lrn2ID

>Nope. #GG lives or dies together. If the majority tells me to fuck off and goes to a different board,

Fuck off.

Non-shitty default CSS when?

>>179762

Yes, but not for a while until everything is blown over.

Also I was dumb and didn't realize xchat didn't have logging on by default, so the first 30 mins or so of the meeting is missing (the point I started to wonder and thought to go check it). I WILL give you guys the rest at some point though.

>>180186

Alright, that's fine, as long as we get the logs at some point things will go a lot smoother.

>>180316

It wasn't, only unstickied. It may have fallen off due to being so old and past the bump limit.

https://archive.is/KWaVn

I archived it for you just in case. :3

>>180331

Why was it unstickied then? It's an important thread.

>>180337

Almost everything was unstickied.

New board policies and sticky limits. Individual dig threads will now get temp stickies instead of trying to centralize, and major-long term #OPs will be centralized instead of being spread out.

We're cleaning up everything and cutting permanent stickies to three.

>>181184

Come visit us on /pol/ or one of the offshoots (obv not leftypol).

>>181184

Most of them are friends, are friends of a friend, with each other. How else do you think Wu went from unknown to mainstream hotshot in the blink of an eye?

You don't have to actively fight them everywhere, but when they give you an easy target…

>>181486

That's a pretty naive statement… That isnt how this kind of ideology seeps into gaming and other industries. You cant just focus on the gaming related stuff, you have to push back on all fronts, otherwise you are just wasting your time. All the "happenings" in the world dont mean shit if they still maintain influence in game development and ect, and you can only prevent that by discrediting them more and more.

>>181502

That's what /pol/'s for isn't it?

>>181605

pol is many things. People who started using the hashtag from Baldwin almost immediately took to calling out SJW's as a whole. Maybe not everyone but many did. This is why people like Milo, Cathy, Sommers, and ect initially got involved, because we were talking about subject matters and people they have to deal with all the time.

If it isnt evident that the people coming after the game industry isnt just doing it too the game industry, I dont know how else to convince you. Beyond that, I dont see any point limiting gamergate boards conversation in terms of dealing with these people. Not everyone jumped in on the hashtag for the same reason, no reason to try and force your reason for being in gamergate onto others.

>>181691

May 28.

>>182134

Is 3 days the limit? I seem to recall HWs saying something about IP history only being stored for a finite amount of time back during the Dan Olsen debacle.

How far back can you see a poster's history?

>>182415

No, I've seen IP histories go as far as back to April 20th for some posters.

This is really good stuff thank you for putting this together.

>>179659

why is post edit disabled?

I've been reading this board since the beginning, but its become apparent its fucking dead now. I don't know if it's the stupid mod politics, or the movements dying out, or something else entirely. All I know is every time I come here it's always the same boring topics with no new content. What happened?

Don't believe me? Look at the catalog. Majority of the threads are days and weeks old. Hell even the board list shows the numbers dropping.

I'll probably get called a shill and be banned for this, but whatever.

>>184277

>every time I come here it's always the same boring topics with no new content

so why don't you post new topics or create new content?

>>184279

I've never been involved enough to even post. I've always been watching, enjoying, from the side lines. Why would I start now where there is basically no audience?

>>184277

Just got rid of dramafags and idiots and regulars are enjoying the rise in post quality already, we just got rid of the cancer.

You're either free to stay and actually get gamergate done or maybe you can go to KiA and twitter, you can get your internet points there or something if you prefer others to do your work.

>>184281

i'm just saying, the reason this board seems dead is we probably have too many people content to watch from the sidelines instead of get involved

>>184282

Like I said before, I've never been involved enough to even post, that includes KiA, twitter (I don't even have a twitter, fuck twitter), etc. I couldn't care less about stupid upvotes and e-cred.

My point is that fresh content is at an all time low, to the point where I don't even read this board much any more. I can read a few threads and come back weeks later and they're still there with little new discussion.

I should add that I avoided all the forum politics the last few weeks because I don't pretend to understand any of it, and have no idea who is right or wrong.

>>184289

That's because of the general nature of gamergates less content recently and it's places like KiA and twitter who mull around with their slackavism or their upvotes. You can either bitch about how there's no new content or you can make it yourself.

>>184283

Fair enough, you're not exactly wrong. But like I said; if I didn't post before. it's not any easier now with a quieter community.

It's catch 22 I guess, you need content to make content…

>>184294

And I admit it's not at all. All the noise happens on the loud fronts but HQ really isn't a front so expect it to be quiet, really. This is where organization is done to actually get OC and good info to those louder fronts. /v/ usually gets to work with OC and posts them here too so there's that.

>>184277

>the movements dying out

I've seen more and more people calling GG a movement. We changed our minds about this?

>>184289

>I can read a few threads and come back weeks later and they're still there with little new discussion

Cool story bro

HEY MODS WHY IS POST EDIT DISABLED?

>>184298

movement, consumer revolt, harrasment, hastag,

"bunch of autists", it's irrelevant what you call it. It's a thing. Whether that 'thing' is dying out was my point.

>>184300

well thought out response, bro

>>184347

It's only thread deletion that's disabled. It stops someone dropping a thread for bait reasons and deleting it before the mods come about.

>>184300

We had a brief issue with faggots making hothead posts and then self deleting, making the threads look like they were being censored to anyone too lazy to check the logs (most people)

It'll come back eventually.

>>185150

>>185150

Namefags are shameless attention whores. There is literally no reason to namefag unless you're the fucking board admin responding to help requests.

Same with autistic weeb avatarfagging.

>>185176

I generally agree, but those posts were not against any rules or inciting drama.

>>185150

Val's been unbanned as of about 2 minutes ago. There was a misunderstanding that led to the ban, so it's been lifted.

>>185058

Is mod02 still here?

>>185452

He's been on haitus for over a week, but will be returning.

>>185799

If not liking the moderation of a single boards makes someone take a stand against the entirety of gamergate, the anti side hasn't really gained much.

>>185799

You smell of bait.

Too bad, now fuck off.

gamergate.me is showing offline. There's a cloudflare cache of where it was?

There's no archive for /hq/ like there is for /v/, is there? I see /gamergatehq/ on 8archive but it's really dated and none of the threads are recent.

There are a couple of threads that are 404'ing for me (#182969 and #182435) and I'm not seeing their removal in the mod logs. I don't think they were old enough to be knocked off the catalog (only a few days old) so I'm wondering why they just disappeared.

>>185799

>thanks for nothing

>why didn't you play along with my ruse?

It's your own fault for making such a shitty thread to get your point across. Next time, play it straight.

>>185856

No cuntplaining, boy. I go in with a perfectly neutral post and I get attacked. I get what I want from one person, I thank him and ask if there's more.

How can I say that this board opposes harassment if this is what happens when I try to prove it?

>>185182

Rule #7 is basically no avatarfagging unless you're dumping info from your personal digging.

It hasn't been enforced in a while and we're starting to get a few more autistic faggots posting their waifus or other cartoon characters to try to whore for attention.

Not exactly gamergate material, but this can shed more light on cultural marxism, and how it has been used as an ideological weapon.

http://kontextmaschine.tumblr.com/post/102832530243/countersignal-kontextmaschine-once-implied-that

>>185799

We don't dox or harass people who oppose us (those who do are either trolls or falseflaggers). That doesn't mean we have to fight doxing or harassment.

GG is not an anti-harassment campaign, just as it isn't a harassment campaign. It's a consumer revolt against unethical (primarily games) journalism. Whoever isn't satisfied that we're not what they want us to be can kindly fuck off.

>>185978

An interesting discussion about it here:

http://www.red*dit.com/r/DarkEnlightenment/comments/3898v3/usg_used_cultural_marxism_against_actual_marxism/

>>185799

Gee. That's too bad. Oh well.

Apparently SHG_Nackt was banned? The digger?

>>186921

A permaban for this post:

>>186737

He also contributed these posts to the thread:

>>186675

>>186738

>>186741

>>186743

>7: Avatarfagging is only allowed on posts making a material contribution to a thread. No posting them just for commentary. If you're contributing good shit in a post, you may avatarfag that post.

He seems to be abiding by the rule here?

Mod06 is also responsible for >>185150

A pattern is forming. I know the rules are being strictly enforced, but you're banning people who aren't breaking rules. Ease up.

Also,

>If you're contributing good shit in a post

probably should be expanded on. What constitutes good shit if those posts by Nackt weren't good enough?

>>186949

>>186921

I see now he was unbanned while I wrote that, also by Mod06. Good.

>>186961

We cleared that up. Apologies all around, I didn't make it clear that Rule 7 and related wasn't a "Purge" thing.

Easy confusion since we slapped Trophy and Swami's shit so publicly and half the mods are new guys.

>>187016

Read his posts in this thread, or just click this and scroll down a bit.

https://8ch.net/gamergatehq/res/181955.html#q182484

>>187021

nice job, AM

I guess this is where I should ask:

>For those who want to go more in-depth on the political aspects of #GamerGate, go see our allies on /pol/

So we're having a little discussion on /leftypol/ about this current ordeal and this (along with a few examples of /pol/ circlejerk) came up as a proof that /gamergatehq/ "has clearly taken a political stance". Which, frankly, is a valid point I have no good answer to.

So, how do I respond to that? Or are you actually allied with /pol/ and the left-wing people should just avoid this board altogether?

>>188746

/pol/ is the politics board

they've always been our allies have you ignored the mountains of OC featuring uncle /pol/

just because communists threw a hissy fit and made their own hugbox that doesn't mean /pol/ is right wing only

>>188752

You are not answering my question (which, if it's not clear, is "is /gamergatehq/ right-wing only?").

But you attacking my board of choice is hardly encouraging. We've been your allies too. Question is, are you willing for this to continue? Frankly, I find it hard to defend you after this kind of answer.

>>188755

>is /gamergatehq/ right-wing only?

No.

>>188755

I'm sure as hell not on the "right" side of the fence!

Hell, as far as I can tell, most of us are anti-authoritarian lefties that prioritize freedom enough that we can work with folks we don't fully see eye-to-eye with against a common enemy.

I am under the impression that you're something of a newfag, or at least not in the know, to not be aware of GG's history with /pol/ starting on halfchan.

/pol/ was the final refuge from blanket proto-gg censorship on the old board and that relationship remains functional to date.

I hardly spend any time at all on boards that aren't /b/, /v/, and /hq/ so I don't know what /leftypol/ is about.

-but if it's at all authoritarian it is no ally of mine even if we do share many of the same values otherwise.

>>188758

To clarify my (not the board's) rough political position:

Government is a necessary evil and we should strive to have as little of it as possible while still maintaining just enough of it that the common man has as strong advocate.

Big government is just as big a problem as big business and I'd rather they were at each other's throats than in bed together.

That said, the only politics I'd like to see here is a unified front against dishonest and corrupt agenda pushing within media.

At the moment, that fight puts us at odds with SJWs. This is a pity since I agree with the spirit of what they are after but NONE of their overzealous, blindly immoral actions.

>>188776

The one I read had Acid Man posting in it, and he was constantly being attacked. Even accounting for shills, it was complete insanity. There was very little reasonable discussion, which surprised me. So gamergate threads always get out of hand there?

>>188778

To be fair it was a drama magnet thread, anyone reasonable would be able to think "No discussion, no solution" and just hide the thread. I know it can be a bit demoralizing sometimes to have some posters on /pol/ dislike you guys but don't let anyone unreasonable regardless of their "identity" get you down.

>>188757

>>188758

>>188772

Alright, thanks.

I just rarely visit here (only interesting threads that get linked on /v/, basically), so I find it hard to speak about this board in particular, and we currently have some concern trolling regarding /ggrevolt/ and GG as a whole that I wanted to counter. Needless to say, your answers should be enough.

(But let's face it, 4chan /pol/ and 8ch /pol/ are two different boards. You may complain we split off, but the fact remains and the current /pol/ has a specific ideological leaning at its core, not just by virtue of majority rule.)

(Regarding /leftypol/, we're mostly anarchists, so regardless of how you view our Leninist friends, no worries, we're not going full gulag any time soon.)

>>188786

The best study done on GG's political leanings was made by Allum.

http://gamepolitics.com/2014/12/29/editorial-gamergate-political-attitudes-part-1-movement-right-wing#.VXGL7M9VhBc

gamepolitics.com/2014/12/30/gamergate-political-attitudes-part-two-old-liberals-vs-new-progressives#.VLznqlWJOuY

The leaning is consistently left lib.

>>188772

That image is from 140 people. Far from representative of gamergate dude. The person who put it together did so, specifically to combat the narrative that it was a far right. movement. People need to read up on the images they use.

>>189465

Do you honestly believe that an international movement about truth and ethics would ever have been comprised mostly of American right-wingers? I bet well over half the posters who come here aren't even American at all, let alone right-wing (or /pol/lacks, for that matter).

If /pol/ is feeling a little underrepresented, that shouldn't be surprising: they do not make up the majority of GG, they never have, and they never will. I do not appreciate their SJW-style attempts to co-opt the movement, and frankly they can keep their anti-tranny/kike shit to themselves with the rest of the tinfoil.

>>189665

who cares about pol anymore. Pol turned to shit back in march. Regardless your assumptions about what political side gamergate sits on is your problem. I was just stating what should have been obvious, that imgage isn't accurate of who uses the hashtag.

Nobody at pol thinks gg represents them nor do they try. The far left is always trying to claim it is a left movement against the far left or onyl about ethics.

regardless I think people who post that image and people like you who want to believe that people who use the hashtag are a larger % of X is just hilarious as it shows who has created an identity out of the hashtag.

I'm actually sick of the the whole politics thing period. We have lefties and righties both and injecting partisan politics only serves to break us up rather than letting us simply focus on common goals.

The old guard of game journalism needs to either radically reform or burn. The corrupt-ass indy clique needs to be dragged into the light. The SJW cancer behind both issues needs to be sent into remission.

Everyone that isn't on the extreme social left should be able to agree on those points and work from there.

There are a bunch of old threads being bumped back to the top of the catalog. Whoever's doing it please stop because you're not adding anything of value to those threads and they haven't been posted in for weeks.

>>190894

Mods have been keeping an eye on them.

Make sure you guys are keeping the good active threads bumped on page 1 please.

>>191367

>>191988

While the mods are sorting out this bump-sliding business, here's a temporary "Page 1" with some (genuinely) recently active threads:

>>176167

>>186774

>>187432

>>189527

>>189597

>>191158

>>191352

>>191787

>>191870

Reminder that we now have 8 stickies. I think one or two need to be removed.

>Use the Catalog, retard

Of course, but still we don't want an overabundance of redundant stickies anyway.

I think the Purge thread should be taken down, as that's over and done with. The drama in there can take place in the Off-topic/E-celeb thread. Right now it seems largely redundant.

Also, we have 3 Deepfreeze stickies. We really shouldn't have anymore.

Shouldn't it be a good idea to have monthly charity drives? The world is based around money, how about we donate our own money to causes that are worth it to show the world we are not a bunch of godless rapists?

>>192189

DF could be de-stick and condensed into a single megathread.

>>192275

The PR game is a fool's errand. Better to hold our shekels for priority targets, if anything.

Your money to blow as you will though.

>>193161

>toxic consumer-first ideology

"you have to take it in the ass and love it"

That said, it is a good point that piracy somehow falls outside the realm of ethical concerns. In b4 sheel.

>>193161

>toxic-consumer-first ideology.

WHAT THE FUCK!

SAlt! Thy name is SJWs!

>>193161

>toxic consumer-first ideology

>Stupid fucking customers! Why cant we scam them with fraud Kickstarter campaigns and shitty games in peace?! Why should we give them the chance to complain?! This is so triggering!

>>193161

>Consumers shouldn't have a press they can trust OR refunds

Amazing.

It's true that it sucks for people who don't want to shit up their product with DRM Though.

So is the Steam Refund thing good to go on this board? GG is effectively just pro-consumer advocacy at this point, and I think the stance the journalist cabal and others have taken should be met with weaponised autism.

>>194085

I'm for pro-consumer practices and they are worth discussing here, but to me GG is still about the journos. Pro-consumer issues should be discussed with the gaming community at large. The journo narrative about us has done a lot to limit our reach for other causes.

So when are you ever gonna fix that link to /pol/? Because I'm pretty sure it's not supposed to be http://8ch.net/gamergatehq/res/https//8ch.net/pol

>>194935

Done. I guess Hotwheels changed something in the way the announcement handles board URLs by appending the 8ch.net for you. I had it in the code so it did it twice. All better now.

ITT: Damage Control

>>195707

>expecting anything else

welcome to meta threads anywhere on the internet.

Why is Vivian in OP picture? Thought 8chan and 4chan were different places???

>>195987

hownew.ru

So gamergate fights "10/10 best game ever made-ign" journalism?

Is that what it is?

What has feminism to do with it?

>>197615

No. Gamergate fights the "Hey, lets blacklist this guy together!" and "I'll write a review about a game made by someone I have sex with!" journalism.

Feminism just happens to be the excuse and sometimes the motivation for a lot of these corrupt practices.

>>197622

So it also supports "anything goes" in video games like violence, sexism etc and wants the journalists to remain neutral and the feminists to remain silent.

Is that correct?

>>197639

No. It fights for the freedom of expression and freedom of speech. Those who push for video game bans or censorship are what we're up against. Censorship is the tool of the oppressor.

This time the censorship is not pushed by the usual suspects of radical right wing religious conservatives, but radical feminists. Gamergate consists of various people coming from all over the world and different ideologies to oppose those who push for censorship in games.

Polygon can write whatever useless tripe it wants about why games to them are sexist. But framing developers for things they have not done, or getting caught with other corrupt practices in the meantime is something Gamergate does condemn them on.

Radical sex-negative feminists can keep crying in their tumblrs all they like. But the moment they push for a ban of some video-game or demand some artistic aspect in the game has to be changed, is when Gamergate confronts them. If they want games to be about perfect feministic utopia, then they're free to start developing games themselves. Its a free market and free market thrives on meritocracy.

>>197642

Ok, i got it.

Thanks for spoonfeeding.

>>197706

No problem, this is a FAQ thread after all.

>>197642

you forgot how they are engineering social media and using social pressure to shun what they don't like. Polygon writting stupid sexist claims clickbait is part of an effort to make games "politically correct" and actually end up affecting gaming and freedom of expression. It's way more subtle than trying to enforce censorship, it's sum social shaming style censorship right there yo!

>>198554

Motivations dont matter as much as the methods. If they would play it fair and say make a bunch of obvious propaganda games about it, then its all good. But shady and corrupt practices behind people's backs? Thats bullshit.

Polygon can write whatever dumbass opinion pieces they want, its their right. But the moment they try to pass off something like Wardell being rapist as truth, is where theyre in the wrong, and when we should confront them.

>>197622

>Feminism just happens to be the excuse and sometimes the motivation for a lot of these corrupt practices.

Wat? Everyone that hash been caught in corruption was a feminist, postmodernist, or liberal progressive, every fucking one. SJW's are most definitely the people many of us focus on… Well because it makes sense, you look at SJW's you will always find corruption.

>This time the censorship is not pushed by the usual suspects of radical right wing religious conservatives

There has never been a real push to cnesor by the religious conservative right, specially in video games. Jack Thompson was practically alone. It's almost always been a democrat in the states. You are thinking of Australia maybe for conservatives trying to force that shit. Closest thing conservatives censored, and it was self censorship, was D&D.

Blaming the right wing for something the left has consistently done, to make it seem like the left wing progressives are not so bad, is a pointless.

>>198887

I'm thinking of US, Australia, Germany and my homecountry Finland. In pretty much all of those, majority of those pushing for bans of violent video games have been the ultra-religious conservatives.

Granted theyre not always "right-wing", country specific-wise. For example, our Christian Democrats-party isnt exactly on the "right" side of the political spectrum if you compare it to the US one. And of course the cultural differences, in many ways even our more radical left is more right than many of the right-wing parties of the US (mandatory conscription one good example).

>>195229

Mr. AcidMan, the Hong Kong gathering thread has sank down three times. I know that you are unable to pin the threads because of it being obscure, but WHY are you not using 8archive.moe? I need it to get the thread text to restart the thread. It has not archived anything after Apr25.

Hope you can respond, and allow me to make threads. Thank you.

>>199897

Sorry anon, but we already are using 8rchive. Its been broken and not archiving properly for a while now. Hotwheels is looking at fixing it, but there's nothing I can do from my end.

where do I start

Is the vivian VN project still alive? The one with lewds with gilda, oculas & others.

many comments are either invisible, or half are not appearing in /r/KotakuinAction

what's the explanation for this?

I have nothing to do with the GG movement I am just a curious bystander from plebbit

>>200693

Link him to Deepfreeze.

>>200693

>>200696

Wow I tried to explain it to him that the gaming media are trying to label everyone who likes sexy girls in games as women haters and he says

"just kill those bad games journalism"

I think he gets it

>>200699

What game(s)?

Does anyone have a list of the Game journalist websites that revised their policies regarding ethics?.

Auerbachs latest Twitlonger on Gamergate and journalists bitching about the fact AAA doesnt bother demonizing us:

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1smmqdt

>Which is to say, corporate corruption is *professional*. The journos and their favored devs made such easy targets for Gamergate because their corruption was absurdly inept. The AAAs and mouthpieces like IGN and GameInformer and PCGamer run a professional outfit: sure, it's all a big PR con job, but they aren't going to have journalists reviewing games by people they're publicly friends with (or if called out on it, they'll apologize, add disclosures, blah blah), and they eventually realize to cut out the Doritos nonsense, even if a bit too late. Moreover, they aren't going to be dumb enough to run a bunch of articles on the death of gamers. (That would be the "passions" trumping the "interests.") As far as incompetent corruption goes, the journos were the low-hanging fruit. Investigation into AAA corruption would take boots on the ground that Gamergate doesn't have. The journos made it easy. Indie scenes have always celebrated themselves, but they usually don't make themselves targets to quite this extent.

>So Gamergate has been pretty convenient for the AAAs. Gamergate is doing the dirty work of distracting, annoying, and quieting a chronic irritation for the AAAs, and the AAAs just have to sit back and keep quiet. This drives the journos crazy, but there's not much they can do about it, short of politely griping in articles like Nutt's (or impolitely griping on Twitter). Meanwhile, the AAAs are cutting off Kotaku and Polygon even as gamers stop paying attention to them. The journos' strategy has backfired. There must have been some collective delusion that they thought their influence could actually pull some weight with the AAAs, even with Gamergate as a potential lever. As I've said before, I don't know what they were thinking. They ragequit their audience.

why is sargon popular

he's the michael moore of gamergate

>LOOK at this OUTRAGEOUS and INCONCEIVABLE act of RADICAL [feminism]!!!!1

i get that he's maybe -entertaining- if you already agree with him on everything but this is not the stuff to show to neutrals or normies, and the fact-checking leaves a ton to be desired despite his loud insistence on being totally objective (a word he uses about as correctly as the typical /v/irgin)

>>202293

Yeah. His fact checking is poor and in some of his videos he simply mocks people he doesn't agree with without offering any sort of rebuttal to their points. He antagonizes neutrals and feminarcissists who genuinely believe they're doing the right thing. I think of him as the Big Red of GG.

>>202324

I find most of his videos rather well put together and cited. On the other hand, I could see you point if all you saw were videos where he points out something crazy and says "yeah, that sounds like what a Social Justice Warrior would say" or something along those lines.

He has a ton of videos where he really does provide evidence and reasoning to back-up his statements but some of the newer videos have had a bit more editorialization imo.

Thanks for the pic and ref to Gameranx, I am going to look at these sites, thanks again.

>>202324

>I think of him as the Big Red of GG

Eh, Sargon isn't obnoxious or aggressively ignorant, and will always try to be calm and polite to people. I consider myself a fan, but have to agree that whenever he stops going for the low hanging fruit his arguments leave a lot to be desired.

He also gets salty pretty easily, almost every time he debates he gets jerked around and then makes a video about how he was actually right.

>>179659

> Tight moderation doesn't mean harsh moderation

Most preferable moderation would be harsh- but fair moderation. Rules should be the same for everyone. Those willing to bend the rules and say make a "boycott thread", should first ask about it on e-celeb and make their case, to show they have a good reason for it, -other than yet another attempt at stirring shit.

Not sure if this is the right thread to ask, but I had a thread approximately a couple of days ago that is strangely gone now. It was about a Toronto Star short article about 4 indie devs going to E3. Pic of Agiri in the starting post.

Only remotely controversial thing I can guess about it was one reply in the thread, that seemed to have low reading comprehension implying I somehow automatically hate -all- independent\smaller sized devs and games.

Just curious and strange to why I can't find the thread now, and even though last time of checking it only had 7 replies. It's hard for me to believe it just slid off since I see far older threads still up. Could be just a glitch or honest mistake, I'm just curious about it.

>>207194

We have a spam setting enabled that will prune a thread at page 5 if it doesn't have enough replies. Keeps the board from being nuked by topic spam. It probably got eaten by that.

>>207240

Ok den, I browse using catalog so everything is one page. Aight, thanks for clearing that up.

Hey Acid, is it just me, or has there been a surge in necro posters lately? I'm seeing threads from 2-4 weeks ag, suddenly being popped up on the front page. They've been bumped down a while ago, and now they've been bumped back up with little to no addional content.

What the heck is going on? Is somebody out there trying to bury something here or what?

>>208813

This has been an ongoing problem for a while, and the mods are well aware to it and trying to deal with it.

Honestly, is there anything that can be done by necro posters?

>>209004

There's a page five prune, why not an <x number> page/day/week autosage?

>>209149

Time-based autosage would be the best solution, but is there also the option to reduce the total number of threads the board can hold at once?

I know the point of this board is to be able to hold onto information long-term but frankly given the time it takes for a thread to reach the bottom of the catalog, it becomes long since outdated and there is plenty of time to archive anything relevant.

Having fewer threads total in the entire board would make sense since total board activity is on the decline (no use running from the truth), it would mean that autosaged threads would drop off the catalog more quickly. The downside is that the board is less resistant to spamming but I think it's better for the board to adapt to the current situation rather than wait for a hypothetical.

The other thing is, and I understand that this is going to be asking for a huge amount of work bordering on the impossible or unreasonable, but maybe have mods manually autosage some of the oldest threads every day? Although that's an extreme solution and probably not a good suggestion.

>>206882

Excellent handling of that. We don't want to turn into Wikipedia where they cover up for their friends' mistakes. That road, over a long enough distance, leads to My Lai.

Thank you for your service to the anon formerly known as Mod06. If you have the time, we could use some more diggers. For one thing, we still don't know who most of the people in Ghazi are and whether they have any conflicts of interest or not.

>>209149

All in all its a good thing /revolt/ happened. Its a containment board for the Ayytists, who now shit on this board a whole lot less when they can masturbate each other over there instead.

>>213361

As long as you don't mistake rule changes as the go-to response like you did with the nuke (which, I'll be honest, seems a lot more faggoty in retrospect), I'm fine with either of the first two options. Third option I'm likewise leery about because shilling the board inevitably changes the board composition due to immigration, which can lead to possible changes in how d2d matters are conducted on the board, and those always cause drama when they happen. And nobody likes drama when it's happening to /gghq/.

However, I'd like to float the question of why it's so urgent that we raise our numbers. Most of us who are still here are GG stalwarts who aren't going to back off anytime soon, while most of the regulars have either lost interest or are taking a break (again, remember that many sites lose traffic during the summer due to people changing their schedule for stuff in meatspace), so it would seem to not be a serious problem if we're still being productive and the user loss has mostly leveled off.

Remember, we are never going to be a well-oiled machine. A brainstorming session might do us some good with the new happenings, and it's probably a good idea to refresh the twitter front if people are abandoning it as much as you say, but don't expect miracles to come of either option.

Things are going to be slow during the summer, but that's not necessarily the death knell you fear it to be.

>>213361

I don't think activity is something mods have much power to improve. The whole idea of the purge increasing activity seemed hopelessly optimistic to me at the time, it's ruled more by the number of interested people not spending time on other things and the number of events to discuss.

>Host a #GG strategy round-table meeting in a sticky. Get faggots in and think up new #OP and dig ideas and plan out dates and order of execution.

GG has an abundance of leaderfags and a lack of workers. Productive stuff tends to happen because the person who wants it done actually works on it and makes it happen. New ideas created on command after 10 months aren't likely to be particularly good. It's not new but if anyone wants to do work and doesn't know what to do I'd like to see someone else doing the sort of solid digging that @Boogiepoprobin is doing.

Brainstorming might inspire more people to work on things, but it's perfectly possible for none of the new ideas to be good, and the discussion might not inspire much activity or get anywhere. Doesn't seem harmful so long as people don't bandwagon onto a bad idea or get too dissapointed if it doesn't get anywhere though.

>Run a "return to Twitter" campaign to get anons who abandoned the Twitter front (there's lots) to get back on the horse and spread the message again, so our network doesn't weaken.

No. Frankly twitter is a terrible platform and anyone spending time shouting into the void there reduces the number contributing to a better platform like HQ. Especially when they get burnt out at the stupidity that the platform structurally encourages. Per-person productivity is higher for fullchan than twitter, so encouraging people to spend their time there is the opposite of how to respond to less active people.

>Shill the board in the hashtag and on KiA and other media platforms so people know they can come here for the good stuff?

I don't see a lot of people moving platforms at this stage.

Most of gamergate's energy came from 4chan /v/ and /pol/.

Most of that has dissipated as people lost interest.

Strange it lasted as long as it did, I thought it would be over when the TFYC got funded, rapeape the 4chan mod said 8chan would be dead in a week. People underestimated GG.

>Frankly twitter is a terrible platform and anyone spending time shouting into the void there reduces the number contributing to a better platform like HQ.

Gonna have to disagree with this in the strongest terms. The only people we talk to here are eachother. We took over Twitter in the first place to get #GG's messages out of our hubs and into the normalfag wild. It can't possibly be overstated how important it is to keep control of the one mass media platform we have.

>However, I'd like to float the question of why it's so urgent that we raise our numbers.

Numbers means more experience being shared, more brains and eyes analyzing content and ideas, and more mouths spreading what we come up with. Numbers aren't the end-all-be-all and I don't think we should ever compromise ourselves to get them, but they are at least somewhat important to maintaining our effectiveness.

>I don't think activity is something mods have much power to improve. The whole idea of the purge increasing activity seemed hopelessly optimistic to me at the time

Agreed, but the staff knew that seeing an upswing was a long shot going in. At least we didn't end up like revolt, so we overcame that particular trap with it. It didn't have the hoped improvement in our size, but it did stop the death spiral we'd become caught in, which is a net win.

>>213404

Probably the most succinct analysis. It just doesn't mean we get to stop. :3

>>213404

> as people lost interest.

No one lost interest, they lost their patience with all the bullshit from people like >>213432

It's the truth, hell just go ask anyone who isn't currently active in gg.

You went full ows and full leader, no one wants to be part of a movement that's just circlejerking around leaders, arbitrarily restricting content and actively hounding out those wanting to take action.

I was in gamergate to fight for free speech which solves all of the other issues involved because when people have the right to reply and the place to do it people can't get away with all the other shit. Once gamergate became pro-censorship and started acting like sjws I eventually realised it's just not for me. Your numbers will never recover (gamergate that is ) nor will your quality of discussion. You drove away the people who cared and contributed most either through your own vanity/stupidty or in some cases I suspect wilfully.

At this point I just hope gg dies soon a sfrankly it's an embarrassment to see something I fought so hard for right from the start become not only a joke but the very thing I was fighting against.

Still I'm sure all the idiots responsible will carry on making logical leaps of fantasy to make out like it wasn't their fault though.

>>213439

Ya at the end of the day folks I have to be frank. This anon is right. I have been a regular poster here since the board migration and I have to say,at first I could really appreciate the new direction that was being taken wrt community managment. It really did (initially) improve the quality of discussion and got alot of things back on track that bladee and co had let go sideways.

But that said the risk was that if certain people's egos got to big it would all turn inward, the idiots among us would be the most vocal people, and shit would fall apart. And that seems to be exactly what happened. Shit /v/ is now apparently saying "gg is over after airplay" and shit like that. Its obvious at this point, painfully so what went wrong here.

I think its time we refocus our efforts on things like some of the investigative style stuff /pol/ is known for and covering the many happenings of the descent into madness western society is going to have in the next year or so. Shit, we practically have a responsibility to at least cover this shit, no one else does (at least the entire story that is).

So I think it is time to move on sadly. Don't know what else to say, I can't stay in denial anymore at this point. Seems to me GG ran its course by the time the last board imploded, and it should have ended then.

>>213439

>Still I'm sure all the idiots responsible will carry on making logical leaps of fantasy to make out like it wasn't their fault though.

such as yourself?

>>213459

>Seems to me GG ran its course by the time the last board imploded, and it should have ended then.

GG isn't entirely chan focused though, the basics are still popular on Reddit.

The basics of it continue even without the name but since GG has been given so much media attention the name sticks around.

>>213374

>Remember, we are never going to be a well-oiled machine. A brainstorming session might do us some good with the new happenings, and it's probably a good idea to refresh the twitter front if people are abandoning it as much as you say, but don't expect miracles to come of either option.

This anon get's it.

Gamergate is ten months old. We've had tons of board drama, 2 boards burnings, board split and infighting, etc.

We can point fingers until we're blue but anyone paying attention to gamergate knew this is the natural result, and there really isn't much anyone can do about since this is how internet controversies end.

We keep going until there is no one left.

I just feel like GG doesn't have much to do any more that can't be done more effectively without the banner\tag\label. I don't think it's all over, but I think we've made our point (and should continue to do so), but there was only ever going to be a finite supply of nepotism to talk about\expose before things ran dry and got stale.

Just look at KiA, it's a bunch of clickbait posts, circlejerking around celebs, and angsty internet libertarians 10 months late to the party. Obvs. that's because it's plebbit so that's to be expected. But it's just a joke, it feels like everyone is just clutching at straws, it's just a different type of outrage generator.

>>213522

Agreed, it's become pathetic. Drop the banner now, faggots.

>>213632

He is right though. The overt worship of fags like Milo and Oliver is damaging GG and driving away neutrals. Critics of them are roundly dogpiled.

Like it or not you have leaders now and you chose them yourselves.

Most inactive GG'ers (and there are quite a few of us) have backed off because we can see it turning into a second chanology/ occupy.

>>213640

>Most inactive GG'ers (and there are quite a few of us)

You guys are dead to me.

>>213667

Why? Because we took a step back to assess the situation like sensible people?

Your them and us attitude is exactly the same as the SJW's you fight.

>>213671

>Your them and us attitude is exactly the same as the SJW's you fight.

Are you seriously using this shill shaming tactic?

I dont mind if I'm as bad (or worse) as the SJW's. It's a cultural war and we're in it for the long run. There's no need to fight "correct", there's only need to fight honorable. That means: make sure you will win.

>>213667

Spoken like a true SJW. I guess people are either with you or against you, right ?

>>213674

>cultural war

groan

Actually I'd be more inclined to think this very direction of discussion is the biggest part of the problem.

At what point did "leave our baggage at the door and work together" become "I don't like your decision/thinking so I'm taking my ball and going home"?

We need to get over that and get back to basics, IMO. That sort of attitude was cancer at the start. I'm not trying to dig on you guys, but if you've really been here since the beginning then know exactly what I mean.

>>213783

>At what point did "leave our baggage at the door and work together" become "I don't like your decision/thinking so I'm taking my ball and going home"?

The fucking hypocrisy of that statement is hilarious coming from you. You are the one who purged those you didn't like. You are the one who encouraged if not helped /v/ to raid and witch hunt anyone with a different opinion. Fairly certain you shilled for KIA mods on their reductionist crusade or at least worked heavily with them considering how similar your statements as "leaders" were not to mention within 24 hours of each other. Oh and why don't you suggest going back to basics like boycotts, oh wait you and your lot forced all those guys out too.

Keep just throwing shit out there like it's not your person fault (and every dick who went along with it too) while things continue to fall apart.

Hotwheels was right, hotpockets is what kills boards and things like gamergate and nothing else.

You may hold sway now still but once this is all over people who aren't fucking cretins/useful idiots or outright shills will remember who was responsible and there will be no revisionist history.

>>213522

KiA is doing well, much better than this board.

Part of that is because they're on Reddit and this board is on 8chan, if this was a board on 4chan it would probably be as popular as KiA is.

>>213439

>no one wants to be part of a movement that's just circlejerking around leaders

I agree with this but it happened much earlier on when twitter/irc circlejerkers tried to make themselves the leaders. Their exclusionary behavior decimated Gamergate's numbers but it still evened out, I think Acid fucked up but the pieces had already been broken by circlejerkers before he got involved.

>>213829

KiA is doing great as a general anti-SJW board, but most of the shit on their front page there right now has fuck all to do with GG, and that's pretty much the case all of the time now.

>>213834

Something like 70% is gamergate related.

Whatever it's doing is working.

>>213834

KiA looks like r/politics in its perpetual "Jon Stewart Obliterates Delivery Boy" stage, only with Republicans replaced by SJWs.

This is probably the best you can expect from something built out of reddit.

>>213832

I agree twitter did it all first and a lot worse, but honestly we did better at times without at least on boards without them interfering.

The need for attention and praise, or think yourself above criticism was given a big leg up by the people on twitter though.

>>213834

>anti-SJW board

Hah, you do realise they are attempting to remove all sjw posts and anything not progressive enough. Fucking hat even said that was his goal and he's well on the way to working towards it. Nearly all the goodposters from kia have gone and most are either progressives or accounts a few months old who are also progressives.

Oh and as an irony to their fucking hypocrisy despite claiming to remove "shit posters" all they have left now is pointless fucking talking about twitter. Absolute cancer and intolerant, entitled, millennial fuckwit sjws is pretty much all that's left.

Despite the fact I waned them all this would happen over 8 months ago, pretty much exactly. I have no sympathy for all the other kia members who left or defended the mods though. Fucking cuck faggots just looking for an excuse to feel powerful or better than someone. Classic shill tactics were use all over gamergate and people refuse to see them because of their own goddamn entitlement.

…around January, February there used to be like 3000+ people here, how the hell did you loose all that people?

i can't believe any of the people leaving cuckchan between august/November 2014 ever went back…

>>213875

See I see the complete opposite, I see KiA infested with generic american libertarian types gagging desparate to stick to to "the left" without any clue as to why they're even on the sub in the first place, like most of them know fuck-all about GG and aren't interested in anything related, they just want to whine and cry about feminists.

>>213887

Well I was there from pretty much when it started and it's the millenial/left/sjws in power pushing their way and attacking people instead of debate.

You can get banned for fucking "misgendering" someone, don't tell me the "right" is the one controlling that board…

>>213904

Well yeah I was one of the first 100 subs, so..

You're right that they have some weird rules. But there's definitely a growing disparity between the userbase and the mods.I think very few of the original GG people are left there.

>>213929

Oh and for the record I don't disagree that there are clearly some people pushing an overly right wing agenda. Just that they are very much in the minority and without power. I don't think they are responsible for the fuck the left attitude, I think that's more down to the actions of the left towards gg members.

>>213881

This board didn't even exist then. I think the most GGHQ's ever had is around 1800 and the numbers on /gamergate/ were already declining in January/February away from the peak point you're remembering. From there it's been a steady decline and activity in general seems to be that way everywhere but KIA, who grows with the added benefit of being more anti-SJW and one of the main places to discuss reddit drama. People have mostly settled into their little groups. I don't mind the smaller size as much because it's easier to keep focus and getting co-opted is becoming harder. Just important that we don't lose the ability to have fun.

>>213881

>i can't believe any of the people leaving cuckchan between august/November 2014 ever went back…

They probably went to /v/ or stayed on Twitter.

Maybe some did go back, 8chan boards for a lot of subjects aren't that active.

>>213881

February was when the SVU episode hit, and drove up users and revived the board that was dying.

During December/January /gamergate/ was dyign pretty bad during the holidays.

>>214331

>Are you going to help think up and implement a solution, or just whine and try to pin blame on your enemy of choice?

Nice, straight out of the gentlepersons guide to forum shills on how to evade and blame the other person. I've offered advice plenty of times, no one took it. I don't waste my thought nor breath on fools.

For the record you literally cannot undo the damage you and other like you have caused. You can't make people care again.

>>214331

>We need something to either reel back people who lost interest or to entice new blood to become active with us.

GG just can't sustain the interest, people need new things.

>>214334

That didn't answer the question, although it implies the "whining and blaming" bit is your choice de jure.

If you have a suggestion to get more people involved in a productive capacity this would be a very good time to share it. Pretending to be the all-knowing bystander too good to talk to us plebians for fear of bruising your ego really does fuckall to help the cause.

The cause does matter to you, right?

>>214341

True, but we do have the power to change what we present and the ways we present it. One idea I floated to the mods was to adapt #OP Shills in a Barrel to SJWs in gaming. Pick a couple targets and dig into them for dirty laundry to spread, the way we looked for COIs with the journos. An idea I got in return would be to try throwing #GG's weight into the PCmasterrace effort for the PC game port review system, and then use our involvement as a platform to reach that audience.

I think we have options, we just have to choose carefully what to go with so we don't step on our own dick elsewhere.

>>214344

Free speech and censorship matter to me, gamergate is not about that any more in fact it's guilty of that. You caused this mess by being a hotpocketeer and I personally told you at the time this would happen.

Don't go shifting the blame now like a 6 year old. The solution is to go back in time and not drive everyone away. You can't do that nor can any of the other moderators who did the same.

I'm not whining, I'm directly proportioning blame, you were the one who whined and drove everyone out not me. Fix your own fucking mess, I'm not your parents and your not entitled to my help.

You're all just giving the same bullshit replies you did when people warned you this would happen, it's genuinely sad.

>>213439

>Your numbers will never recover (gamergate that is ) nor will your quality of discussion. You drove away the people who cared and contributed most either through your own vanity/stupidty or in some cases I suspect wilfully.

The irony of these kinds of statements is that they suggest that this great number of extremely important people would be able to do something on their own terms. But of course, no such thing ever happens. The closest thing to a split emerging was /ggrevolt/ and we saw the abundance of worthwhile content produced by THAT.

It's the same song and dance every time: "all the REALLY important people have deserted you. I can't name them because they're anon, but I have suspiciously accurate awareness of their number at the same time. Everyone who mattered and had true and lofty goals is gone, but at the same time these mythical paragons will not do jack fucking shit despite the fact that I declare them to be the true force that ever accomplished anything within GG. You have driven them out because you listened to "leaders", instead of listening to the nonspecific people I vaguely refer to who were not leaders, the difference between them being vague and confusing."

It's the exact same line I got from the Ayytists: "We chose to fight this our own way!" Yeah, ok dude, let us know when you get to that part.

>>214361

Sure.

I still think DevDex is a good idea. You guys have a bugaboo about it but it would be nice if some would join us in the IRC and help us out. We only want to improve the gaming industry here.

Another idea that only I really did and never gained any traction is taking CL's info about IndieCade and the IGF and IndieFund and e-mailing the FTC about it. They're looking into Kickstarters, it's only logical they could also look into this as well. They haven't looked into it at all, I really think there should be a push for this.

Also, I know people have programming skills here. I know people don't like Drybones now but I think StartButton was a good idea, but Based Gamer came out and it's a glorified Bleacher Report for games.

No one bothers talking about making some sort of consumer list for consumers, by consumers, when it comes to games. The closest we ever really get is something like /v/'s recommended games wiki, but I think there needs to be something more comprehensive than that.

But whatever, I'm just a salty shill cuck, right?

>>214351

>People just don't want to take our suggestions and that's fine

>>214230

>it's more the waiting for somebody else to do things. GG does a lot of that.

aaytism is a helluva drug

>>214363

Drybones left, and he created

GitGud

the GGwiki

the 8archive

helped run /gamergate/

and wanted to work on StartButton before his project manager threw a hissy fit and he panicked.

but whatever, those people don't matter right?

asshole.

>>214369

>implying I haven't contributed to DevDex

>>214371

>those people

Plural? I was not aware Drybones was an organization.

Same fucking thing EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. You talk about all these important people who left, but every goddamn cunting time you're asked to say who they are, you run behind Drybones' skirts. Every time the ayytists' apologists yap about how they worked so hard, Drybones is the single solitary guy they can mention. There's sure an assload of bitter, useless cunts claiming everything they say is golden by hiding behind him.

Not to mention that he began to have his vague as-yet-unexplained moaning about GG even before Blade imploded, so I have no idea why you would blame Acid for that.

Yes, Drybones did stuff. But he's one guy. You keep on yapping about great numbers of people, several of which who have done great things and whose departure was somehow directly owed to Acid. Who the fuck are those?

>>214377

you want me to give more examples?

well how about Jim?

>>214367

>No one bothers talking about making some sort of consumer list for consumers, by consumers, when it comes to games.

Here's the idea: why don't YOU talk about it?

All this shit just reads "Man, why aren't you guys doing all these things I'm thinking about?" Where are your posts proposing these things? The OPs? What are you, the Idea Guy?

Go make a fucking thread about the IGF stuff. That's how this shit gets started.

Let's try this again:

>"No one bothers talking about making some sort of consumer list for consumers, by consumers, when it comes to games."

Ok. Where do we start? How would we make one? What would be the advantages? How would it be managed? What's the ultimate purpose?

If these questions wear you down, then perhaps you might get to the core of the issue: the reason you get told you're nebulous and easily swept aside is because you ARE nebulous and easily swept aside. We need more than someone who goes "you should make [thing]" and then fucks off to scratch his balls and whine that the plebeians aren't acquiescing to your genius.

>>214367

I actually didn't mind DevDex at all in principle. The concern with it is keeping a hard line so it doesn't interfere with REBUILD. The shilling and animosity that was coming from where it started also cast suspicion on its intentions. I maintain that its a good idea in principle and I hope it succeeds as a separate initiative from #GG.

>Another idea that only I really did and never gained any traction is taking CL's info about IndieCade and the IGF and IndieFund and e-mailing the FTC about it.

Is there anything actionable in the information? IIRC the only argument against doing that was that we didn't have any hard slam-dunk kind of evidence to pass to them and didn't want to push it just to see it debunked and the IGF off the hook.

>Also, I know people have programming skills here. I know people don't like Drybones now but I think StartButton was a good idea, but Based Gamer came out and it's a glorified Bleacher Report for games.

Drybones is a sad case, but the choices he made were as one-sided as it gets. Even I kept sticking up for him until he went full autist and shut down his infrastructure out of butthurt. I'm still utterly undecided about BG, but I'd agree that more pro-gamer sites ran by #GG allies would be a good initiative to push.

>No one bothers talking about making some sort of consumer list for consumers, by consumers, when it comes to games.

Only tricky part of that is REBUILD. The only way to perma-death the journo network is to make them obsolete by building a direct link between devs and gamers. Its something that SHOULD happen, but not yet IMO. Not until the tide of devs is more publicly with us and stable. When Rebuild has won on its front then we should supplant the journos for dev criticism as well, I think.

>But whatever, I'm just a salty shill cuck, right?

Yes. :^) But your ideas have merit.

Reminder that nobody has ever been booted out of this place just for having differing opinions. Their actions and in some cases overblown presentation of those opinions (to the point of disrupting the whole board) are all we ever busted on. That was something certain parties worked very, very hard to ignore and narrative-craft otherwise. You were an Ayyteam faggot and got the boot for what happened to /gamergate/, but that hatchet is buried. Your opinion is as valuable here as mine or anyone else's, so share it as you like.

>>214382

>Go make a fucking thread about the IGF stuff. That's how this shit gets started.

I did.

Do you want to know what happened?

I got my shit deleted for no fucking reason, and my thread got deleted in the process.

I shilled CameraLady's videos trying to make good, and nobody posted in them.

Thanks for that, by the way.

>Ok. Where do we start?

I'd figure using the /v/rec wiki as a framework and expand outward from there.

>>214381

>well how about Jim?

You can't keep a thread of conversation to save your live can you? Acid drove him off too?

And if you want to whine so much about general ayytism, what are YOU bunch of cunts doing? Because even Jim went off to do his own thing, however I disagreed with him. Meanwhile, the rest of you sad sacks just hover around us doing absolutely jack and hypocritically whining about the things you say we aren't doing.

Do a thing that gets some actual results, then come and whine about how we're somehow not bowing to your genius.

>>214381

I was shitposting on /v/ and compiling advertiser lists when IA left. Try again?

>>214390

I never said you drove him off.

But GG turned him away even though he contributed some stuff.

>>214389

>Do a thing that gets some actual results, then come and whine about how we're somehow not bowing to your genius.

working on it.

http://devdex.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

You can help too, if you like.

How do you check if you're on the blockbot?

>>214331

>I don't think anyone saw a summer slowdown coming.

The narrative has shifted against the corrupt journalists and SJWs in general, theyve been more quiet than usual.

That in turn means less fuel for us, and less fuck-ups by them. We're starving for Happenings and events, basically.

>>215020

the archive for hq only goes to April 26th.

There's a lot of stuff missing from there. Lot of problems with 8archive that can't really be fixed

suffice to say, 8archive is dying.

Hotwheels is gonna make a new archive with the new infinity setup he got going a while back.

All a matter of when it happens

What are the board's thoughts on Furious Mulatto/Blue-Skinned-Devil?

What's the deal with Forbes? Ethical? aGG? The stuff I've glanced over has been conflicting.

>>215096

Depends on the writer really. Erik Kain is neutral, but seems to lean GG more than anything. He was one of the only journo's trying to facilitate discussion early on.

One of their other tech writers was blatantly aGG, but the guys name escapes me. Seemed pretty irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.

>>215539

This post may initially give the impression that I'm calling for GG's end but this is not te case, read it in full before commenting.

I think that the reason why people are losing interest in GG is due to GG supporters not actually needing GG anymore. Think about it for a second. If you support GG you're most likely already aware of all of the corruption that's going on in the gaming press. You know not to trust articles published on Kotaku/Polygon/Gamasutra/Destructoid/whatever. You already know that there's a good chance that the author of the article/review wrote it while having an undisclosed conflict of interest. You don't need the gaming press to reform because you already know that you should ignore it.

The only people who might duped by the gaming press are people who aren't aware of all of its corruption and it's for these people that GG should exist. What we need to focus on are projects like deepfreeze which work on spreading awareness to the issues that are central to GG. Our success is not dependent on how many of us are there, but on how well do we succeed in having our message spread.

I have a general knowledge question. Why is it a conflict of interest if journalist A, say, supports person B on Patreon, then gives him or her positive coverage (without disclosure)? I can understand if journalist A was the one being paid by person B, then there would obviously be an incentive to keep the money coming, but in the first case I don't really get it.

>>215969

I'll let Kotaku reporter Kirk Hamilton answer that question:

https://archive.is/eKyXm#selection-537.1-537.325

>Say you write for Kotaku. You get a private email tip. A friendly indie dev is accused of something awful. You’re the only one who knows. If you befriended/backed/pledged $$ to that person, would you feel comfortable covering a horrible accusation against them? If the answer is “maybe not,” it's probably best to re-assess.

>hat was the thing that left you feeling uncomfortable covering the story? It's usually difficult to say. There probably wasn't any one thing. But it isn't a bad idea to remove things that may contribute to discomfort down the road, especially if it's as easy as pressing a button to cancel a small financial pledge.

>>215990

Makes sense, thanks.

>>216191

A new fire can always rise if game journos try the same shit again, but I highly doubt they would be so incredibly stupid they would try it again.

Gamergate 2.0 is a thing in the future. And by that time Gamergate will be remembered more fondly as people will realize in hindsight the damage this SJW moral panic has wrought.

Take IRL moral panics like Satanic Ritual Abuse for a good measure. Corrupt media also played integral part on that one. It took 10 years for everyone to unanimously agree that the whole thing was a fiasco and a major mistake, and all the press and con-artist "psychiatrists" and book-writers were to be blamed for it.

>>216403

>A new fire can always rise if game journos

Yeah but what we need in order to succeed is not new a new fire to expand our ranks, we just need to energize our current base. According to 8chan's board list we had 654 active users in the last 72 hours. Let's suppose that only ten percent of these people become dedicated diggers. That's about 65 new diggers. @BoogiepopRobin from twitter, who is a great digger, does digging about twice a week with the intention of finding new COIs. If the new diggers in the hypothetical scenario that I'm proposing will follow the same routine, than within about a month or two will be able to have deepfreeze grow significantly, probably even twice or more of its current size.

>>216424

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%25_rule_%28Internet_culture%29

We likely have a lot of lurkers.

On the other hand chan boards don't require signup or registration so the percentages are probably much different for us.

>>215267

David Thier and Paul Tassi

I'm here because passing by halfchan /v/, I saw a thread that died quickly with a

>Press Start to Unlock

pic

Last I heard about GG, it was the Redchanit Law & Order episode, and looking at that OP, this shit has most definitely leveled up.

I just want to know, are there NEW journalist websites? Indie games still could use exposure

>>221941

you missed out on >>>/redchanit/ m8

a few small sites have been made but nichegamer and techraptor are probably the ones that have grown the most (which were created before gamergate)

>>221941

Check http://gitgud.io/gamergate/gamergateop/blob/master/Boycott-and-Support-Lists/Support-List.md

NicheGamer, TechRaptor, GamesNosh, AttackOnGaming, APGNation, LewdGamer are my favorites.

What's the final goal of gamergate?

>>224924

Well, it started out being about corruption and political correctness damaging the hobby/art of gaming, but at this point, it's more about rescuing feminism (and other equality movements) from insane SJWs.

At its heart, GG is really a Progressive movement, which makes it really ironic whenever anti-GGers claim that GG is "right-wing" or "Republican astroturf" or whatever. We're working for a future where people will *actually* be equal, whether they have vaginas or penises, no matter what their skin tone is, whether they like pickup trucks and country music, or having anal sex with members of their own gender. SJWs are working towards a future where all of that stuff *always* matters; we're working towards one where none of it ever matters.

>>224924

Extermination of all sentient life.

Or bringing ethics back to games journalism. Your pick.

>>225163

"I'm an SJW so I'll choose the top one, because a world where we can't use dodgy ethics to enforce narrative is not a world worth having" - What they actually believe.txt

I have a question.

By now it's more than obvious the connections between gaming sites, between gaming sites and mainstream "news" sites, and SJWs that paste everything together. They keep a narrative. Now, why do they always repressent reddit as a homogeneus hate site? Aside of reddit having numerous different communities ("communities"), and keeping everything under the same umbrella is dumb, it also has a quite a group of SJW, which, guess what, have huge control of the site (moderators and admins), for quite a time by now (it became way more noticeable the last year, but in hindsight they had it for a long time).

SJWs have a lot of control of reddit, but SJW media outlets keep calling reddit a hateful place of racism/sexism/homophobia, this does not compute.

>>226407

>SJWs have a lot of control of reddit, but SJW media outlets keep calling reddit a hateful place of racism/sexism/homophobia, this does not compute.

It's to enable further SJW control of Reddit. They want to drum up investors, etc. into removing boards like KiA and The Redpill.

>>179659

http://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm

If we are concerned about our reputation then the following quote from this helpful info link may be of concern.

>5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for 'conspiracy theorists' and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain.Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.

The part about JFK might paint the movement as a mock-able conspiracy group.

Not a huge issue but its worth taking a look at maybe? I'm just a twig what the hell do I know.

>>226696

On further thought this is a stupid topic ignore me I am an idiot.

>>227200

>>227200

We had /pol/, who used to be really good at digging up shit. Too bad they abandoned us after we failed to uphold the principles of Nazism.

>>227200

The board self-destructed twice, and for the past 11 months has always been surrounded with drama on way or another.

Of course faggots were going to abandon it. gamergate boards have proven too unstable because of the nature of this controversy, compared to the likes of KiA which while having some drama has not spilled spaghetti all over the board yet.

>>232240

KIA is a hugbox tho.

The mods have nebulous rules to remove triggering shit.

>>232639

If anything it proves that Kikewheels' libertarian philosophy actually doesn't work in practice. People want stability, and libertarians don't give a shit about that since they are borderline anarchists who are comfortable with complete chaos. KIA may be a hugbox, but they don't have to deal with constant board migration and shills. On Twitter shills are easy to spot and people gravitate towards e-celebs which, despite them being attention whores, are able to instil some form of control since people listen to them.

>>232639

I'm one that migrated most of my GG to KiA, and the main reason was much more simple:

Its a lot faster to see what is going on 'today' there than it is here.

Here you have to filter out the ton of bullshit that goes on whenever there is no happenings.

There is ordered by relevancy.

But whenever there is a happening, I certainly do come here due to the immediacy of content and the more autistic nature of how the information is parsed.

Keep playing your strengths.

>>232639

Too many namefags. Granted that's the point, but still…

I'm actually beginning to lose faith anon.

>>232690

no

The guy that owns KiA isn't even really involved with the community, he just sits back and lets the lower mods handle it.

The lower mods like hatman ask the community for ideas and go with it. hatman even quit and gave the position to someone else.

He didn't burn down the board, he didn't throw the users under a bus, he just acted like a reasonable person.

>>232910

Hatman isn't a reasonable person you dumb faggot.

He treats his community like children and acts like a fascist by imposing nebulous rules that the mods can enforce at will.

>>232690

Don't agree completely but I see where you are coming from.

Twitter relies on e-celebs. KiA, like all subreddits, is more hugbox but it's much harder to shill and keeps it more stable.

Then you have the gamergate boards, which were imageboards with much more free-reign and anarchy. No matter how good or bad the board owners did it all ended the same.

It's not just gamergate boards either. Other boards on 8chan have been destroyed, others have sprung anew. It might just be the nature of this site, especially with a board as controversial as gamergate.

>>232639

I think this is because KiA grew partly out of an existing community in TiA, which already had a curation structure in place. I guess the same could be said for the gg boards and /v/, but it's not as clear as it is on plebbit. The curation on KiA has also been much better than here. The board burnings caused us to lose a lot of people and momentum. I don't think many people think this board will stay going for very long, so I think people are reluctant to engage and become invested in it given what's happened in the past.

KiA has it's own problems though, focusing less on GG and more on other battles over time as they diversify and pick up more people from around plebbit. I don't like a lot of those people and a lot of what they post makes me cringe and not want to be associated with them, so I deleted my plebbit account a while back.

I think video related should be available in a long-term sticky like this one, because it's one of the greatest topics that can be used against GG, and because it can prove to be hugely important for SPJ Airplay, especially when Derek Smart advanced that he'll touch this topic in the panel.

- Why GG should continue to be chaotic, minimally organized as it is, and avoid having formal leaders, formal organization, formal goals, etc.

The thread on Sargon (>>234486) was e-celeb shit that shouldn't have it's own thread (and neither should this MundaneMatt one >>233098) but remember to bumplock threads instead of automatically deleting them.

Heyho

August 28th 2015 is coming up pretty soon, and I had this idea boiling in my head. However I'm not sure if I'm the only one who would want to do something like this, and basically asking if we should create a thread for it.

GG meet ups aren't something new, but considering how important that one year anniversary of the "gamers are dead" articles are to us, I would think that a HUGS global meet up in all major cities around the world would be a great way to celebrate our won battles, prepare for the rest of the war AND to show SJW no, we ARE still not dead. Gamers will not die.

Milos book is being finished soon (I think not sure if it is already out if so my bad) it would be great to end it at such a high octane.

I am not sure how to organise something of this scale, but I would be thrilled to help if GG would actually want to.

So what do you think? Potential? Complete Shit? Should I just kill myself? So should be try to make this happen. I looked through the Web and didn't find anything like this, so I'm sorry if it was already proposed. We have about a month.

>>234698

This is in response to Mod09, by the way. He jumped the gun a bit in my opinion.

>>234728

>meetups

Please no, not a fan at all. They do nothing for gamergate but make it into an identity and a social hangout, make us lose our biggest weapon which is our anonymity, and bring cringey Chanology aspects to it. GamerGate isn't a social movement.

Just hang out as gamers. Our anniversary will likely be just the same as any other day: sending emails, watchdogging over corrupt game journalists, and blowing SJWs the fuck out. Besides, it's likely not possible to organize something at that scale. Just go to the local meetups.

Of course, this is all just my opinion. You can do what you want, you are your own leader after all.

>>234776

I agree, it's e-celeb faggotry, but still shouldn't have been outright deleted. Only bumplocked.

Mod09, imo, is being a bit trigger happy when it comes to deleting things.

>>234776

Well to chime in here.

So there is the archives of his site and then some. Somebody wrote an article about him which is what started all this, not the videos those came later.

I will see if I can find those links and place them here.

Now that being said. I DO THINK the OP of those threads was being retarded.

He wrote them real shitty for one, it basically sounded like a kid screaming:

SEEE

I TOLD U

SEEE GUIZ LOOK

and then there was the fucking red text shitposting

But that all being said I do think this bears looking into. It should be kept here for now.

All this said. Acid: Mod09 is definitely trigger happy, that much is true this is not the first time. Please ask him to try bumplocking things from now on if its not outright shitposting or something. I don't want this board to go the way of a hatman style implosion or some stupid shit like that.

>>234864

Make a halfway decent thread for it that doesn't read like a shill OP and I'll sage it and you all can discuss it in there, same as anything else. That alright?

>>234870

Read my entire post. I was not the OP of that thread and I do think it being deleted was not a bad thing.

>>234878

Oh left this out.

Ps

*That is why I said it should be KEPT HERE

as inside the e celeb thread.

Even if there was any good info, which I reaaalllyyy don't know about even with the links I have seeing being thrown around, its still e celeb stuff.

Lest we turn into an e celeb board (and there is already too much of this gossip bullshit) it belongs in here.

>>179659

>8archive.moe is this a mumble if not then what is it

>>234891

Any Aussies out their please help. We got a major outbreak of SJW media clickbait.

Anyway you can post a reply as a guest to right this wrong.

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-way-people-justify-booing-afl-star-adam-goodes-sounds-just-like-the-excuses-from-gamergates-sexist-taunts-2015-7#respond

>>238947

https://archive.is/hXZ7M

Can someone explain to me what's antiSJW about exposing corruption ?

>>240340

SJW culture is inherently corrupt.

They rely on nepotism, feigned offense, and censorship to promote their ideology while stifling opposing voices.

Love the red pill in her hand. Golden.

>>241084

I never actually noticed the redpill at all,till you pointed it out.

>>243686

Looks tasty Leader.

>>234883

as he said, if you still got the info the other thread had, start your own thread with it, make a decent OP, even ask for auto-sage while you're at it to make crystal clear your intention with the thread.

/gghq/ is a special one of a kind board and i think this board should definitely be using the features of 8chan to its full potential.

That is why i propose a custom css and a dancing Vivian gif to the right

that shill thread saying GG never did anything got baleeted. so reposting my reply here

>>245271

>>245266

you should tell Gawker then, when they announced their brand change while explicitly naming Gamergate and implying GG is the reason they have to fix their image.

ya know, instead of ignoring us like they used to do. them admiting we did 7 figure damage in ad-revenue was prolly to try to get us contended and hoping we'd stop.

also FTC forcing native advertising to be obvious and crediting Gamergate specifically. like it already is in more respectable news sources.

Gamergate is a redpill dispenser, you can see the full effect of it now in ANY news article that is wrong with a comment section. Unless a mod is being trigger happy, most comment section overflow with criticism instead of the blind cocksucking we used to see.

>>179659

We might could ad a few more discussion hubs:

https://voat.co/v/KotakuInAction/comments/171491

>>247651

https://ritetag.com/hashtag-stats/notyourshield

>>247982

I expect it to explode again with this whole 8ch fiasco.

Lately there hasn't been much cause to use it, not many happenings, not many SJW's being outrageous douches to wide swaths of people lately. (I suspect major party bosses are clamping down from the other direction to put an end to the embarrassing bleeding)

>>248003

oh noes, the movement is serving its purpose and the bullshit it targets is disappearing!

The horror of #winning….

We must put things on life support the way the US has its "world police" gig by inventing perpetual conflict.. that's it!

>>248011

>oh noes, the movement is serving its purpose and the bullshit it targets is disappearing!

no

it really isn't.

>>248016

let's see:

>The cancer journos have retreated into their own quarantine spaces and turned off comments because the hordes are pounding at their walls.

>Game devs, comedians, and even political candidates on the campaign trail are actively denoucning "politically correct" or even out-right shitlording

>Sensing danger, leftie parties are turning on their loonies.

>Prominent critics of feminists with pull in think tanks, government, and the press are now aware of and defending gamers from this shit.

>Many social justice tumors on twatter and social media are heavily damaged.

#winning.

>>248023

>The cancer journos have retreated into their own quarantine spaces and turned off comments because the hordes are pounding at their walls.

And almost none of them have actually been fired.

>Game devs, comedians, and even political candidates on the campaign trail are actively denoucning "politically correct" or even out-right shitlording

almost no game devs have done that. The rest haven't spoken out at all because they are fucking cowards. Trump doesn't stand a chance, don't even entertain otherwise.

>Sensing danger, leftie parties are turning on their loonies.

uhhhhh

The Dems love Bernie more than Hillary and he's an actual socialist

wtf

>Prominent critics of feminists with pull in think tanks, government, and the press are now aware of and defending gamers from this shit.

what pull? Seriously? Roosh? Breitbart? Who?

>Many social justice tumors on twatter and social media are heavily damaged.

Twitter and Reddit are dying when people think they should be hubs of free speech.

That's not the way it should go.

>Twitter and Reddit are dying when people think they should be hubs of free speech.

Imagine them getting socjus-cucked and NOT dying.. that would be far worse.

Sometimes the best way to save the internet is to tear it down.

I've danced this dance a couple times before.

Time for web2.0 to die and web 3.0 to begin its buildup.

>>248034

And that's fine

but the alternatives fucking suck.

>>249024

Yog-Sothoth knows the gate. Yog-Sothoth is the gate. Yog-Sothoth is the key and guardian of the gate.

>>250983

You were doing a good enough job telling him he was a false flag. Deleting him would make him post it again faster.

>>250983

What was the falseflag about?

>>251366

Someone was claiming to have caused the bomb threat. He wasn't even falseflagging anyone, he was being an obvious troll.

So I was looking for information on Bioware, EA, and Dragon Age stuff to see what went wrong from Origins to Inquisition.

Gotta say that deepfreeze.it finding some of this information. Got a laugh when I found out gamespot use the entitlement argument with DA2 with a combo of online hate of m'lady.

I will mention that there is consequences for EA and gaming journalist's obsession with calling gamers entitled trolls.

1. The Old Republic was not the WOW killer that gaming journalists promoted it to be, and is now advertising free to play with the rest of the free to play mmos.

2. Noticed EA took a longer time to developed Inquisition as it was not rushed out in less than 2 years like DA2 was.

3. Bioware employees with high ranking position leaving. Both Casey Hudson and Jennifer Helper left Bioware at times that where EA was under the most pressure from consumers from there recent games that had been released and negatively received by many consumers.

4. No release of official sales figures. You get the first week and nothing else. Interesting enough, Inquisition's first week sales are somewhat disappointing when compared to what other games have sold in there first week. The mediocre destiny shoved more units and half the game got cut. In addition, no other official sales numbers have been given other than it's first week.

5. Other notable things. BF4 had a glitchy as all hell release. EA's Origin service on PC had a return policy before steam and even offers prices competitive to such EA did something right?.

TL;DR do not be EA and give your consumers legitimate reasons to be mad.

>>215539

I don't think so, this seems different

>>255873

OK anon, i'm a retard, could you please translate this image into words my little brain can understand?

>>256115

4chan has scripts of google analytics running on it. Basically, google is getting data on 4chan. This anon claims that google blocked us because we do not have those things on 8chan and thus google is getting no benefit out of us.

Now, I personally think its more likely somebody is spamming googles CP takedown requests (however you can do that) than google caring about the little bit of lost info here.

So I haven't been on this board for a while but I'm curious as to what happened with the Sony leaks and if anything popped up regarding them influencing reviews?

Hey, could the board owner please remove the link to /pol/ from the top? A lot of us on /pol/ would prefer people from this board didn't come there.

Thanks.

/pol/ here. Reminder we are not your allies.

>>257902

No. Just two different /pol/acks.

>>257916

/pol/ack here. Saw your threads in /ggrevolt/ and /pol/. Be sure to screencap and tell your friends.

Also bba411

>>257916

That's part of the joke man

>>257916

>>257902

Hahah, that wasn't me. And you actually banned someone over that?

A little bit extreme no? Jesus.

>>257912

>They may catch a lot of crap, much of it undeserved

Well look at you being all magnanimous. Tell you what, go ahead and ban me because I think I'd sooner fucking shoot myself than be your ally.

>>257969

You do realize we can see the thread on /revolt/ where yet another harebrained scheme is launched to try to get Acid to delist /pol/ from our board ring.

You guys should focus your energy on devdex instead of these doomed to fail plans

>>257972

It's not going to work either. The threads got autosaged on /pol/ too. /pol/ mods see what's going on.

>>257912

>>257969

>>258173

ED admin here

Yeah, Sir Wulfington is a pathetic, autistic furfag who recently left the ED forum after (unwillingly) taking part in our long and proud tradition of doxing and trolling faggots off our forum (we have strict "no ban" rules so this is the only option for getting rid of these people)

>>258191

He doesn't happen to be British, does he?

>>258199

gosh I don't remember

I'd have to look up his dox thread and find the post… I don't think so tho

>>258173

You did quite a nice digging and had kept a sharp eye upon that thread. But don't get too obsessed with this

>>258199

gosh I don't remember

I'd have to look up his dox thread and find the post… I don't think so tho

>>179659

heads up mateys, we are now below /n/

We going deeper underground

>>258341

>>258173

> https://archive.is/RTg4u

I don't get why does this profesional furfag disabled his twitter if he's really so addicted to drama.

>>258199

here's the EDF thread where he was finally trolled off ED. You can look though it for the answer if you have the energy for it.

https://forum.encyclopediadramatica.se/threads/sir-wulfington-battle-grounds.21887/

>>258173

Hey Acid, since /spergrevolt/ is so fond of infographics, I put together a little somethin' somethin' for you to get this information out. Figured the irony would be delicious

Enjoy!

http://i.imgur.com/UhBFLug.png?1

>>258727

>Using imgur link on here

Plebbitor please this is a modern website

Anons who hate the new look go to options, choose "theme" from the left and at the bottom CSS wheel choose "Yotsuba B".

>>259373

I like the green and purple theme it ravishes my eyes and seduces my soul

>>260401

Upper right corner, options.

Themes.

Pick whatever you want away from Board-Specific.

Ok mods, why the hell did these posts get deleted?

>>259942

>>259950

>>259953

I was redpilling people about the purge and proving /ggrevolt/ed anons that they are wrong, that there was no censorship, that they are drama queens and all, and you delete that for what reason?

>>260481

https://8ch.net/log.php?board=gamergatehq

They don't even show up on the log. Really I have no idea where they went. We can't hide post deletion.

>>258173

GG attracts an unhealthy amount of lolcows on both sides. Good thing we at least get rid of them quickly.

>>260481

One thread was deleted by Mod09, I believe. He hasn't been in the roundtable in a while and may not have gotten the memo I emailed out to nix the rules for a couple days. Can't say anything about the alleged other two.

No reason to sperg. He's human. If it was a non-shit thread just remake it.

>>260667

this should be the GG song m8

>>261151

Ah come on man, listen to the lyrics!

>For years shunned by society

>Outcasts condemned for our beliefs

>Our legions grew in secrecy

>And now, the time is here

>I see the [gamers] everywhere

>The freedom call is growing near!

>We hold our rebel banners up with pride!

>They're colored crimson (pic related)

>And the [GG] is the sign!

How is that not #GG, 8chan, and gamers in a fucking nutshell?

>>261226

The only part i like is

>Hearts of fire

>Hearts of fire

>BURNING!!! BURNING!!! WITH DESIRE

WHo does Rebel Yell whiskey advertise on?

How useful is http://www.rbutr.com/ in being able to combat misinformation?

>>264041

Seconding this.

>>264041

I was wondering where it went to myself for a bit. So many dead threads got necro'd that >>242404 is buried pretty deep.

Done. I'll leave it stickied for a day and see if I can fix the bump limit on it.

>>179659

https://gitgud.io/gamergate/gamergateop/tree/master/Current-Happenings

???

Am I going fucking insane or does anyone else remember a screencap of a reddit convo of ghazi niggerettes discussing posting [flooding] 8ch with child porn?

I can't fucking find it and I kinda need it.

>>275328

Doesn't ring a bell, but you piqued my interest. Hopefully someone else has heard of that and delivers.