/gamergatehq/ - #GamerGate and #NotYourShield

If Gawker wants to be a r-rated website with the trashiest gossip, it is our duty to ensure the advertisers are not defrauded.

I have no problem with advertisers on Gawker, but they should be in line with the content that they promote, in this case they should be asking adult porn networks for ads.

>>248042

how in god's name would armourall and gumout be advertisers for gawker?

>Netflix

I know a lot of you motherfuckers are Netflix customers, as am I. This should be an easy one. Tell them in no uncertain terms that you don't want to support a company that advertises with Gawker and why and threaten to cancel your service.

The boss can only use LifeUp Omega so many times before it runs out of PP. Just keep emailing advertisers.(That's about as powerful as PK Starstorm.) Focus on Gawker and focus on one at a time. Good luck!

Subway is already under fire for Jared's kiddie love habits. They're weak and PR sensitive right now, so I suggest we give Subway extra attention.

>>248045

good timing you.

I just came to this thread specifically to ask in what way is Netflix advertising. if I were to write to Netflix, what would I say specifically that they were doing? "I saw your add", "you are listed on <insert URL here> as a sponsor of gawker", "you were announced as a sponsor on <insert TV show here>"

I take every effort to stay away from Gawker so I don't see where Netflix's money is going.

Do not get discouraged by more advertisers showing up. What is important is not the number of advertisers, but the cost per impression or click that those advertisers are paying. Gawker could be lowering their advertising rates and making far less money.

Imagine a situation where it normally costs $2 per 1000 impressions for ads. Most people don't want to touch Gawker, but Gawker offers $1 per 1000 impressions for ads, meaning your ad campaign reaches significantly more people. At some people, people draw the line and decide that the potential backfire from advertising on Gawker is worth the lowered cost of advertising.

Keep the pressure on and don't let up. Keeping those prices down for Gawker is key to hurting their profits.

>>248644

>Trendy Entertainment

Dungeon Defenders is the game. Interesting Kotaku cost them money in 2013. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trendy_Entertainment

I do think that steampowered may be an adsense like program, so I don't know how useful it would be to target TE.

Contact Info:

info@trendyent.com

904-535-4544

>>247966

>>248644

acid please add this to the op

Contacted Netflix's support team and got an email address for their PR department (pr@netflix.com) who should be getting back to me with how long their current advertising deal with gawker is. I'm going with "If you renew I'll feel obliged to cancel my membership" but a few more voices expressing similar sentiment would no doubt be welcome.

Hey fa/gg/ots, why are you all ignoring Gawker's international outlets? The ones that have their own separate sets of ads and ad tech vendors?

I suggest emailing the UK and Aussie ad tech vendors next.

>>247966

Somebody should have told Nicky that there is no aggro reset!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtvIYRrgZ04

>>249002

The Australian one at least only licensed the name, but is a completely separate entity otherwise. Of course they also seem to push the narrative, but if you want to go after Gawker, then the Aussies are just a distraction.

Just a thought.

Gawker still has the pics of Lenny Kravitz dick and the Hulk Hogan porn post up, right?

Go to those articles, refresh until you get the advertiser you want to contact's ad, screen shot and email something along the lines of being disgusted they are now apparently a porn company.

Really (politely!) ham up your disgust and offence. Think suburban soccer mom.

I'd bet subway would be especially sensitive.

E. G "First the child porn, now this? Absolutely disgusting, shows what kind of company you are now." etc.

>>252529

We could make a reddit post about it and using sock puppets get it onto the front page, make a youtube vid and inflate the views and then get it onto facebook. Make subway think it's going viral.

I haven't done the whole email activism thing for a while. Would the following suffice?

Hello,

I have sent you this email to inform you that I will, from this point forward, be boycotting all [Company Name] products and services. This is due to the unfortunate relationship you have with [Gawker Site] a member of the Gawker Media network. Gawker recently ran a story disclosing a person's sexual orientation. This individual was not a public figure, and the story did not serve a public interest. The article did nothing but recklessly and cruelly embarrass its subject while casting his and his family's lives into turmoil. I have decided that, after this offense, I cannot support Gawker or anyone who associates with it. Unfortunately, this means that I will be boycotting [Company Name] as long as you continue to run ads on [Gawker Site]. Hopefully, you will consider doing business with more ethical partners in the future.

Thank you for your time,

>>253058

You should throw in a link to the gawker article https://archive.is/C5D2Q. Rest reads fine to me.

There are templates and suggestion you can use on the gitgud if you feel unsure of anything.

https://gitgud.io/gamergate/gamergateop/blob/master/Notices-and-Pastas/Complaint-Letter-Template-Sample-Letters.md

>>253076

Thanks. I appreciate it.

>>252529

>I'd bet subway would be especially sensitive.

THIS

Subway is an easy win right now. After the CP shit with Jared, they don't want to take any risks of a PR disaster.

>>254183

gr8 b8 m8 I r8 8/8

>>254189

lol

Seeing that Subway is probably extra conscious of its PR at the moment due to the Jared incident, shouldn't we focus on them?

>>247966

Doing god's work, OP.

>>254183

GUYS. THIS ONE IS FOR REAL. CHECK IT.

So out of curiosity, where did you hear about us anyway?

>>254929

Shall we bust out the big guns like with Intel where we put "Sponsored by Subway" stamps on Gawker shit they do not want to be associated with?

What are you guys exactly doing? Just ddosing and spaming emails?

>>265844

>DDoS'ing

How about no?

>>265863

This is a shillpost, this anon posted the same thing on /v/'s GG thread.

>>265844

>>265863

>>265867

Stop bumping old ass threads

>>265878

It's an old thread with relevant information, so the bumps really don't matter.

>>265880

where can I get more pics of this IRL Vivian?

>>265913

She posted in the gg has the best drawfag thread there are some of her pics there

>>265880

Heard your mother is a bear.

If what MatPat says is true,which probably isn't (because of scoot cawthon fiasco) then we may get an attack on gaming in general. Not for being sexist and all that crap, but in all the other types. So prepare yourselves for le greatest shizstorm in the history of the internets!

>>281480

whoops whrong board

>>281449

They no longer affiliate with gawker.

>>281482

So it means we had influence on them and got them to pull out?

>>248045

>>248210

The advantage of being spic, not being able to afford the shitty service oneself, and other spics being gullible as fuck. I bet I could badmouth them a little, like, say, tell the mothers of one of my friends that use it that it was involved in some CP scandal, and then from there the word spreads.

Also >>252529

>>281646

Yes, idiot.

>>282792

I'm sorry that was mean

>>252529

I've been telling people to use Gawker's porn in their emails for forever. It may take a lot of people to get them to consider taking away ads for being a terrible place with terrible people, but advertisers run from porn as soon as they spot it.

>>247966

I agree.

Gawker has pro-pedo articles. Using those for an op could make Subway a soft target due to the fall out from Jared Gate.

Why is this not stickied?

>>297940

Fuck off shill.