is Encyclopedia Dramatica now run by a bunch of Reddit shits? Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 06:35:04 28a73e No. 275357
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Milo_Yiannopoulos
Given how totally 4chan is Reddit owned now, you gotta wonder by the language of the above article how much ED has been compromised by the cancer.
I've always known Milo is just playing the game, but contra the Reddit ops, throwing his weight behind Gamergate was actually a very smart move, and not because it brought him shekels.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 06:38:53 28a73e No. 275359
>>275357
BTW, I just googled "Gamergate" and look what comes up:
"began in August 2014 and concerns sexism in video game culture"
You mean, white girl privilege?
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 06:51:57 803399 No. 275363
>>275357
ED has always been infested with contrarian assholes. The entry on GG (and associated articles) should be just as scathing as any other entry. However, I do agree that there is a bit of unfunny, narrative pushing in the articles. SJWs are incapable of doing offensive humor properly; to do so would require cognitive dissonance so extreme that they would suffer a fatal epidural hematoma.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 07:15:01 4dec3d No. 275367
You fucking moron, OP.
ED is about lulz above all else.
No one is safe.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 07:53:29 e8f976 No. 275372
Are you retarded?
ED doesn't take a side,they will mock and attack anyone with everything they got.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 08:44:08 361e63 No. 275377
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 09:00:22 b7eb86 No. 275381
>>275357
Looks like a standard ED article. No problems there.
>>275359
>wikipedia
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 09:01:09 f749ff No. 275382
>>275357
I'd be more concerned if that article praised him.
And Reddit doesn't own 4chan you stupid fuck. It's worse then that, they've become Goons like you .
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 10:17:57 ca083c No. 275407
Wow, Sargon's there too - https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Sargon_of_Akkad
Like Milo's article, you can tell it's written by a fan who really wants senpai to notice him.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 11:31:25 a54fc3 No. 275418
I don't think Milo should be exempt from criticism at all, he's done lots of dumb shit. BUT.
>ED is about teh epic LULZ they hate everyone EQUALLY XD
You're a fucking moron if you think none of the writers have an agenda. Humor is often used to make a point and it's blatantly obvious the writers for a lot of these articles genuinely dislike whoever they're writing about. Because ED is big you can find all sorts of agendas, from far-left to far-right.
For instance, the thunderf00t article used to complain about how he's a retard because he "refuses to acknowledge the misogyny in the atheist community"; it's gone now, but since that's gone, here's this:
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/GamerGate
>"Many gamergate neckbeards are known for their harassment and threats. For instance, Joshua Goldberg, a kike, was arrested for giving someone instructions on how to bomb a 9/11 memorial. He was a heavy participant in gamergate under the name "moonmetropolis"."
Note how they just mention him as a "GG supporter" and not a guy who dedicated his life to shitposting who played for both sides to fuck with everyone
>"MUH TEH LULZ! TEH EPIC LULZ!!!!!!!!!!"
There is no goddamn joke.
Fuck off with this "teh lulz" bullshit as an excuse for anything.
Also note how the beginning of the article unnaturally switches very unnaturally from from "Gamergate were doing a good thing and the corruption is real but sadly they got too sensitive to make a serious change" to "Gamergate are universally-mocked morons who are fighting against a nonexistent enemy". This was obviously not the result of a single writer trying to subtly satirize doublethink and hypocrisy (unless you really want to see an edgy shitposting version of Wikipedia that anyone can edit as some genius satire despite lacking any editorial standards) but simply two different editors with two different agendas.
Note how the Milo article was only written in February of this year. No one on ED gave a fuck about him before that and it's clear as day that it was done in response to his support of GG. I actually think GG should criticize Milo's non-GG actions more and tone down the "based Milo" stuff but I still think OP has a very good point about using the "epic lulz wiki" for agenda-pushing.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 11:35:13 a54fc3 No. 275419
>>275418
How do I know a lot of these people are serious and promoting their own point of view? Because, common sense aside, I introduced ED to a friend as early as 2005 and she quickly became a regular editor, far moreso than I ever was. She's not a SJW, but she mocked a lot of Deviantart-type people she clearly had an earnest grudge against and that she often talked shit about with me. She got a bunch of her friends to do the same, and eventually a sub-set of ED became composed of disgruntled Deviantart users shitting on others users of the site that they hate, for legit reasons or otherwise.
ED guy 09/21/15 (Mon) 11:40:55 83860d No. 275421
Sup guys, ED admin here.
Virtually everything GG related was written by me and another guy. That includes both the articles about aGG lolcows y'all been jerking it to up until now, and the pro-GG faggot articles y'all are crying about at the moment.
Anyone on this thread who thinks this was written by an SJW or getting butthurt that their precious Milo is being made fun of is a retard. He thought this article was funny and so did Sargon and Ralph about theirs.
This thread is an embarrassment.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 11:47:02 a54fc3 No. 275424
>>275421
>Sup guys, ED admin here.
prove it and if so how do you explain the bizarre writing choices I outlined here >>275418
I assume you could be "Oddguy" but he's hardly the only contributor to those articles
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 11:49:14 1fdb5a No. 275425
What the fuck is this thread OP? You don't know what ED is, you never googled GG before and only now you appear to be outraged by WP's bs GG article. No newfag would be this daring and dumb. This is the perfect description of a troll thread.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 11:50:16 a54fc3 No. 275426
>>275421
>>275424
Oh also for the record I don't give a fuck about ED anymore, I stopped caring ever since it stopped being "make fun of everything using immature humor" and became "4chanpedia" which was a very, very long time ago
I just think this "everything is for teh lulz, no one writes for ED because they legitimately dislike the people they're mocking" bullshit is retarded
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 11:52:30 a54fc3 No. 275428
>>275425
>You don't know what ED is
Do you think that that the people who shat on Zoe Quinn are actually secretly Zoe Quinn fans who were just "making funny jokes about someone they like" and "mocking the people who REALLY hate her, unironically"?
Because that makes absolutely no sense. I've used ED in its very early days and it's usually been pretty easy to tell if someone genuinely hates something or not.
ED guy 09/21/15 (Mon) 11:52:44 83860d No. 275429
>>275424
>>275426
I am.
Check the article's talk page.
I explain it by saying whoever wrote it though it was funny, and now that I see it's making people angry, so do I.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 11:54:08 1fdb5a No. 275431
>>275428
So you're one of those that thinks legit jokes can only be made by those that likes you?
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 12:02:59 a54fc3 No. 275433
>>275429
Okay, I'll have to apologize complaining about the Milo article; some of the shit in that article IS really obvious irony written by a pro-GG person.
>When he claimed transgenderism is a psychiatric disorder, it's obvious he didn't think of how this could further marginalize a group in need of protection.
This is obviously not serious coming from ED. So, yes; the Milo article, as-is, is likely written by pro-GGers. It does not read like SJW shit.
However this section https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Milo_Yiannopoulos#The_original_article only helps prove my point, lol:
>The first version of this article was created by what appears to be an honest-to-god SJW that wrote the entire thing like the most typical tumblr blog post ever, citing such evidence as "Misandry" being underlined by spellcheckers to prove it isn't a real thing (despite the same being true for "Transphobia") and using both terms like "*trans", "Trigger Warning", "White Privilege" and an account that was created solely for the purpose of writing them, that he then promptly abandoned.
But you know what? going from Internet Aristocrat-like whining about GG caring about "muh PR" too much or whatever the hell to and their claims being valid to claims of them "fighting a phantom enemy" is obviously an obvious conflict of opinions between two writers. There is no joke, no satirical exaggeration as in the Milo article, it's just saying what many people say about GG while trying to sound reasonable.
"ED admin" doesn't really mean anything to me because ED has lost its initial sense of fun long, long ago, pretty much when spouting memes became "comedy".
>>275431
What part of my post implies that? I'm just saying that many, many people genuinely hate the people they're shitting on ED and not doing it "ironically". And lo and behold the original Milo article seems to have written by someone who legit hated him and wanted to complain about him being a problematic bigot. The current version exaggerates its complaints far more, therefore actually being categorizable as satire.
ED guy 09/21/15 (Mon) 12:13:27 83860d No. 275436
>>275433
The "original article" was written by someone as a troll. We decided to save it and pretend it was legit because it's just funnier that way.
And if you think the Milo article is obviously written by a pro–GGer then we didn't write it well enough.
Basically your complaint boils down to: "boo-hoo, ED made fun of someone I like! I hate them now! They're a bunch of SJWs!!!"
Just kill yourself, friend.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 12:14:24 a54fc3 No. 275437
>>275429
>>275433
>This all soon backfired when a number of stations actually invited people from the GG side to speak and Brianna got REKT by 8chan's owner "Hotwheels" on live TV.
Surely lines like this aren't written by people who are pro-GG, everything on ED is ironic after all :^)
ED actually would still be good if it WAS still entirely making jokes about things, but now it doesn't know what it wants to be. A place to post satirical writing? A place to earnestly catalog Internet drama? A place to bitch about people you hate and white-knight people you like? It's ALL of those things at the same time and that's why it's a clusterfuck.
Look at the GG article; it can't for the life of it decide what the fuck it wants to be because of the huge amount of people writing for it who all have a different idea of what ED is all about. Some parts of it are sucking the cocks of GG celebs (as seen above), others are trying to tell "the neutral truth" about GG (also seen above), and some are trying to satirize SJWs:
>"As we all obviously know, Gamergate is and has always been nothing but an unconvincing front for a woman-hating harassment campaign. And on their behalf we are now comfortable saying: Take that! You fucking whores!
GamerGate has helped many woman learn their place, which is in the kitchen and not behind a game controller. Booth babes, fake gamer girl and bitches in general have no place in gaming. Be it playing, reviewing or making games. And any slut that doesn't get that will get doxed, harassed, SWATed and raped."
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 12:15:23 f749ff No. 275438
>>275421
If you are who you say you are, know we're not all retards. Some of these fuckups may be shills trying to start shit like they always do, but there are complete fucking idiots amongst us Sarkeesian Effect didn't fund and make itself , please treat them as you would a furry.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 12:23:35 a54fc3 No. 275442
>>275436
see
>>275437
I don't like Milo. I think many of his articles are utterly terrible & Breitbart is generally a bad site; I just happen to appreciate his GG contributions. I also think you & everyone else making the same points are wrong. I've already made this obvious, but I guess I have to hammer it into your epic lulz-filled head harder because you can only grasp people's points by projecting your pre-defined stereotypes over them.
>And if you think the Milo article is obviously written by a pro–GGer then we didn't write it well enough.
That's the thing about ED, none of the writers have any serious satirical writing skill. It was my fault for not actually properly reading the article before passing judgment because the intent is extremely obvious; no one on "SJW" sites like Tumblr actually writes that way. It was fun when it was just "make fun of everything in a dumb-but-funny way" because you don't NEED to be a real writer to make silly-ass jokes about everything for shits and giggles.
Are you going to deny that there are pro-GG writers for ED writing pro-GG things? Do you think the shit about "based Hotwheels" coming off as smarter than Brianna Wu during the Huffington Post talk is "ironically mocking GG" and not someone who genuinely likes Hotwheels? The person who wrote it obviously thinks it's true.
So if there are pro-GG writers for ED making pro-GG points, what makes you think there couldn't possibly be any anti-GG ones making anti-GG points?
ED guy 09/21/15 (Mon) 12:25:11 83860d No. 275443
Alright friends, I gotta go now. My final words on this are:
1. Rest assured that ED has not been taken over by SJWs. Both the articles supporting and attacking GG are written by literally the same people.
2. To anyone who thinks ED's articles should be written exclusively from a GG supportive viewpoint - Your view of what ED should be are so divorced from what it is that your opinion simply doesn't matter. Stop being butthurt and learn to take some criticism.
Bye now.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 12:25:56 d3de96 No. 275445
Can we stop the faggotry now? All this triggering is gay.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 12:32:56 a54fc3 No. 275449
>>275443
>1. Rest assured that ED has not been taken over by SJWs. Both the articles supporting and attacking GG are written by literally the same people.
I highly doubt this is true. And if it somehow is: what makes you think that switching back and forth between earnestly cumming over "based Hotwheels" and criticizing people like Zoe Quinn into pretending to be a SJW satirically one paragraph from the other, sometimes in the same paragraph, makes for good writing? The articles are a clusterfuck because they have no idea what they want to be. Is the article a pro-GG summary of the events? Is it a satire of SJW overreactions? Is it a bunch of unfunny meme-spouting by people with zero creativity? Once again, it is all of those things at the same time, and that is not a good thing.
>Stop being butthurt and learn to take some criticism.
>criticism
But I thought it was all ironic and jokes and not real criticism :^)
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 12:35:32 a54fc3 No. 275450
>>275443
>>275449
Also lol maybe you should accept criticism of your shitty shitposting wiki instead of trying to portray me as a "Milo faggot butthurt that someone made fun of him" despite saying in my initial post that I think Milo should get more criticism.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 12:39:27 a54fc3 No. 275451
>>275449
>>275443
>>275450
>2. To anyone who thinks ED's articles should be written exclusively from a GG supportive viewpoint
This is also a complete and utter strawman.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 12:45:54 5654b8 No. 275454
>>275363
It feels like it was written by a collab between Zoe & Randi as if Milo was our golden idol that we worshipped. Too bad I'm not offended I guess ;^)
Meanwhile, Randi's been on record has having tried to buy her article off ED, and Milo thinks it's funny. Looks like a victory on paper to me!
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 12:53:03 1fdb5a No. 275458
>>275433
>What part of my post implies that? I'm just saying that many, many people genuinely hate the people they're shitting on ED and not doing it "ironically"
So what? The only problem should be there being lies being used to make fun of someone. This I'd agree, but motives?
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 13:09:09 56dd63 No. 275462
Retards ed has made fun of both sides from the beginning. Get a sense of humor.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 13:11:26 a54fc3 No. 275463
>>275458
>So what? The only problem should be there being lies being used to make fun of someone
Which is exactly what "Goldberg is a GGer who was jailed for being a GG harasser" is. That line has no joke, it's literally just made-up bullshit that aGG-types will Either written by someone who genuinely believes it or an idiot who fails at making actual jokes and thinks simply stating misinformation that they layman has no idea is misinformation counts as satire.
I don't really care about Milo being mocked specifically; I support both Milo's coverage of GG and people like Nyberg AND the people criticizing his genuinely shitty actions. I agree 100% with Hoff Sommers, for instance, that his hit-piece on that no-name fat lady who made the tweet about the dead cop was retarded and that he was being a sensationalist faggot by making a big deal out of a random US citizen no one cares about making a shitty leftist-pandering joke out of someone's death. That woman had less followers than me, and I'm a nobody.
I'm mainly just criticizing people like >>275462 who white-knight ED as "doing everything for teh lulz" or people "missing the point" of it, when the site is a clusterfuck of writers with vastly different ideas of what ED "should" be.
There is no singular "point". What ED is "really about" depends on the defense force of each individual article. There was a time when I tried to steer ED's article for Monkey Island towards a more mocking tone despite liking the series because I thought it would be funny to target a "FUCKING. EPIC." internet-approved video game series, but people changed it back with the reasoning of "fuck off this series is awesome". To this day the article is still people jacking off the game with lame "monkey cheese pirate of doom"-type comedy:
>Best fucking game ever and the #1 reason why people who think that pirates fucking own ninjas are totally right
The ED article for Gurren Lagann was also obviously written by a jizzing fan before it became internet-cool to bitch about it outside of the house of turbospergs that is halfchan's /m/.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 13:12:07 a54fc3 No. 275464
>>275463
*that aGG types will absorb as fact
fixed
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 14:24:31 2d4594 No. 275496
>>275357
>Encyclopedia Dramatica is making fun of us! Someone stop them!!
If that's your attitude, you'd fit in better with the anti-Gamers.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 14:57:03 a54fc3 No. 275509
>>275496
Shit like "Goldberg is a GGer who got jailed for harassment" is the shitty part, not the satirical OP article. If anything it would be much more fitting to talk about how the guy was a master troll and fucked with everyone, not pretend that he's just a "GGer".
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 15:16:26 1b6f84 No. 275517
>>275357
ED makes fun of everything, even itself and its own users. Only bad ED articles are unfunny ED articles.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 17:24:48 28a73e No. 275574
>>275496
>>275517
>>275462
>>275445
>>275382
>>275377
>>275372
>2015
>ED is bout teh lulz stooopid
>u gotta love people who attack you, otherwise ur sjw
>being this much of a cuck
most of it is written in the non-ironic mode, which should make any knowledgeable anon suspicious.
you can't see this though because you're a stupidass.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 17:28:52 f749ff No. 275578
>>275574
You really are fucking terrible at this aren't you
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 17:29:09 a54fc3 No. 275579
>>275574
The Milo article is ironic with the "triggering trans people" stuff but the people excusing everything on ED with the "teh lulz" shit are morons.
see >>275509 , I don't see how pretending that Goldberg was a "GG harasser" and not someone with too much time on his hands who fucked with both sides is doing it "for the lulz". It's not even a joke, just straightly-delivered misinformation.
Also, people don't know what "irony" means. Simply saying what you think in a wackyzany exaggerated way with memes is not irony. A LOT of ED people just write their opinions but with memes and fuckwords and hyperbole and as I said earlier I personally know some of them.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 17:29:51 a54fc3 No. 275580
>>275578
Notice how this faggot didn't actually try to explain why that anon is wrong
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 17:33:42 f749ff No. 275582
>>275580
Now you're doing it as well. You're a fucking idiot.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 17:35:19 b7eb86 No. 275583
>>275579
Your anal pain about it is actually pretty lol worthy.
Maybe there is a connection… nah I'm sure the editor was super serious. Carry on.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 17:39:44 a54fc3 No. 275585
>>275583
I guess the parts where they talk about the actual journo corruption that happened and is provable on sites like deepfreeze must be a funny ironic joke too then :^)
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 17:41:17 a54fc3 No. 275586
>>275583
>>275585
But really are you people truly denying that ED has a lot of people who write bad things about people they dislike because they dislike them and want them to look bad? Seriously? Half the articles are just that.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 17:48:54 28a73e No. 275594
>>275586
this
newer-ish articles like the Milo one have a moralizing tone that simply wasn't there before. People are always skewered but a few Gamergate articles I browsed yesterday have this peculiar moralizing bent that reeks of Redditry.
and to the guy who said 4chan is not Reddit run: you're a fucking retard.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 17:53:19 b7eb86 No. 275599
>>275585
>ironic joke
No. Much like every other article (well the ones that are worth reading) the point is to offend idiots and provide lols for everyone else.
I mean be real for a second. Ethics are boring; nobody goes to ED for that shit. It has drama in the URL for fuck sake.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 17:57:32 a54fc3 No. 275604
>>275599
Except that the GG article catalogs a lot of in a pretty straightforward article with the occasional joke to justify it being a GG article:
>"Finally, in a pathetic, last ditch effort to stop this, the correspondents started going on a final, coordinated PR assault between several gaming news websites that together all published about 20 articles on the same day about how the terms "Gamer" and "Gamer Culture" are officially dead. Essentially trying to stop the bleeding by saying gamers can no longer criticize them because gamers as an identity have ceased to exist overnight. But, as happy as we would have been for that to be true, sadly it isn't. Hilariously, they even used non gaming websites that are part of the same news network to post more of these articles to create the false impression that this is the popular opinion shared by multiple people."
Aside from
>"But, as happy as we would have been for that to be true, sadly it isn't."
There is no other joke here. The writer clearly believes this is what actually happened as does most of GG (I do too). It's an almost completely straightforward account of what happened.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 17:58:26 a54fc3 No. 275606
>>275604
*a lot of stuff
*in a pretty straightforward way
I stopped proofreading my posts because I'm starting to feel like it's pointless to try and make a point to ED white knights
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 18:00:17 a54fc3 No. 275609
>>275604
also
>to justify it being an ED article
.i.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 19:07:34 e8318e No. 275646
ITT people who dont realize ED works just like Wikipedia, anyone can edit an article. And there honestly arent enough EDiots around to manage SJW vandalism.
Also, note that many, if not most of the oldfags at ED dont really give a shit if it happens, especially if it ends up triggering people and creating butthurt. Like this thread.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 19:21:16 1b6f84 No. 275651
>>275574
>I'm upset about an ED article
Why not make a tumblr account about it? If the article is shitty then edit it. ED has had a lot of "revenge" articles since the day the site was born. Lot of article writers turned out to be lolcows themselves, see classic examples like LittleCloud's article.
ED's point is to log in drama and mock everything. If one subject suddenly becomes too holy for them to ridicule, then the whole concept flies out the window.
Leader 09/21/15 (Mon) 19:31:19 f9e125 No. 275659
>>275357
>Not sure if shill or really think skinned Milo fanboy/warshiper/husbandofag
If you are really triggered by ED article, ever, better leave internet forever or abandon any eceled who like.
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 12:05:44 ef2bdc No. 283872
>>275357
Not so funny when your own "sacred cows" get pissed on,uh.Maybe that'll help you realize that a bunch of cretins linking to Goatse ad nauseam is probably not the sharpest satire you deluded yourself thinking that ED was all about
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 12:13:21 517451 No. 283873
>>283872
sup necroposter, i know the board is dead but come on
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 13:48:46 a116e6 No. 283899
>>275372
> ED doesn't take a side
I remember when an admin/mod of ED killed himself they did a serious and respectful article about him. No lulz was allowed then.
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 14:54:42 07fe32 No. 283906
>>275574
no I just dont' care and am not easily triggered by mean words.
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 15:23:10 14e40c No. 283911
>>275357
They went soft on him
Plus Milo handled it like a champ he didn't get butthurt and try to wreck it or bitch about it constantly by not doing so he made himself an unattractive target for ED trolls
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 19:17:52 baa954 No. 283994
ED is great, it makes funs of everything, and it became a bigger goldmine of laughs since 3-4 years now and with all the new cowz to milk , it will be even better.
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 19:23:11 a8353c No. 283997
>>275418
>butthurt gooblergobler gets assblasted by the ED article
it did it's job
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 19:50:36 58759a No. 284010
encyclopedia dramatica takes the piss out of everyone and it always has
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 20:20:48 43cb65 No. 284033
>>275357
kek
Calm your tits. It's just words on the internet, faggot.
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 21:12:22 dbe7e4 No. 284046
what the hell is happening in this thread?
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 21:29:50 2026b7 No. 284053
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 21:39:07 64b99e No. 284056
I remember reading the article before and loving it. ed doesn't pull punches, they don't suck up or get caught up in sides
just fucking mock and disrobe the fucking shit out of every person that shows their face on the internet, ever
I love it and fear it (lel aninomos expept us final boss, seriously though all I'm saying is I wouldn't want to be featured)
Leader 10/07/15 (Wed) 22:33:41 8d16fc No. 284072
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/GamerGate
this one's not even an ED article, it's just straight up pandering and propaganda
Leader 10/08/15 (Thu) 03:27:15 4c7e71 No. 284179
>>284033
I'd be less concerned with ED faggotry if it wasn't a more trusted source than fucking Wikipedia.
Leader 10/09/15 (Fri) 04:50:46 987af2 No. 284670
Eds big problem is that it got overrun by furries who would start an article on anyone who critiqued their shitty art.
Leader 10/09/15 (Fri) 05:03:21 987af2 No. 284674
>Jeff Gerstmann not mentioned anywhere in article
typical GG crap, really, and proof that most GGers are teens or 40-something bigots who DO NOT PLAY GAMES.
Leader 10/09/15 (Fri) 05:14:16 423dba No. 284675
>>284674
literally who.
did you get lost on your way to tumblr?
Leader 10/09/15 (Fri) 05:15:04 f572fc No. 284676
>>284674
>neckbeard virgins living in their moms' basements with an army of sockpuppets
1/10 the only thing worse than failtrolling is OLD failtrolling from someone who is so busy posting here that you have no time to play vidjya
Leader 10/09/15 (Fri) 05:35:07 526c99 No. 284680
>>284674
Please take your name dropping without context e-celeb wank outta here.
>GGers
I want to destroy what you cherish.
Leader 10/09/15 (Fri) 05:57:43 7fc1e8 No. 284684
>>284674
go look back at your other shitty thread, where you mentioned him, and that stupid argument about GG not being gamers. Where it's being currently refuted. have a nice day.
Leader 10/10/15 (Sat) 04:00:28 c0c1e9 No. 285026
>Taking ED seriously, ever
>For anything
If we could we wouldn't need deepfreeze, anons
Leader 10/10/15 (Sat) 11:10:06 45191c No. 285101
ED is by trolls, for trolls. It's wonderfully satirical and unabashedly mean.
AKA, it's doing just fine.
Leader 10/10/15 (Sat) 11:15:39 45191c No. 285104
>>275421
Actually, I did the sea-lioning one. Either way, it doesn't matter. People getting butthurt at ED show just how fine it's doing. The goal of any ED article should be to piss off as many people as possible and to be completely misleading. Even better if you can be misleading by repeating the retarded shit that the MSM says to mock them (look at the article on that jackass who shot a reporter live on TV for a good example which is relevant to Gamergate).
As said: ED is doing just fine. Just wish it got more views.
Leader 10/10/15 (Sat) 11:32:02 45191c No. 285106
>>285104
I should add: If it's not misleading, it should be scathing as fuck.
Unless it's about a meme, then it should describe what it is, document it and mock how shitty it is.
Leader 10/10/15 (Sat) 12:14:17 32873f No. 285109
>shitting on ED
>anti-lulz
>Reddit the thread
Leader 10/10/15 (Sat) 13:39:15 ed5056 No. 285140
>>284046
Some unfunny faggot cunts getting mad at other unfunny faggot cunts.
Saging this piece of shit thread.
Leader 10/10/15 (Sat) 16:13:38 b42cf3 No. 285171
File: 1444493618724.png (177.54 KB, 263x229, 263:229, 252d173a5e0d4cc16ddf2391a5….png )
>>275574
ED is about being mean to people. Literally anyone can have an ED article if they've generated enough drama to fill one out. The best part is that between all the cursing and shitflinging they maintain their articles to be as factual as possible, because pointing out the truth is far more devastating than calling someone names.
Leader 10/10/15 (Sat) 19:19:04 6f91b6 No. 285230
>>285109
>actually thinking ED is funny
Leader 10/10/15 (Sat) 21:03:58 803565 No. 285265
>>285026
ED is eminently accurate about bad things, things that make people look bad
the problem is that it's full of lies about good things, making them look bad and therefore indistinguishable from the bad things
Leader 10/10/15 (Sat) 22:29:56 6ab6e3 No. 285295
>>285265
I'd never trust the accuracy of ED, but they're a useful starting point for investigation.
Leader 10/12/15 (Mon) 01:23:40 c0c1e9 No. 286184